Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 832314, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/832314

Research Article

Bidens pilosa Formulation Improves Blood Homeostasis and β-Cell Function in Men: A Pilot Study

Bun-Yueh Lai,¹ Tzung-Yan Chen,2,3 Shou-Hsien Huang,2,4 Tien-Fen Kuo,² Ting-Hsiang Chang,2,5 Chih-Kang Chiang,⁶ Meng-Ting Yang,² and Cicero Lee-Tian Chang⁷

¹Chun-Yueh Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei 116, Taiwan
²Agricultural Biotechnology Research Center, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 115, Taiwan
³Institute of Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
⁴Graduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
⁵Department of Cancer Biology and Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
⁶Department of Chinese Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien 970, Taiwan
⁷Department of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuo-Kuang Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan

Received 18 August 2014; Accepted 18 September 2014

Academic Editor: Wen-Chin Yang

Copyright © 2015 Bun-Yueh Lai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

B. pilosa has long been purported to have antidiabetes activity, but despite the advancement in phytochemistry and animal models of diabetes, no human clinical trials have been conducted to date. Here, we evaluated the effect of a B. pilosa formulation on fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting serum insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c in diabetic subjects. The B. pilosa formulation reduced the level of FBG and in diabetics but increased fasting serum insulin in healthy subjects. Moreover, combination of B. pilosa formulation with antidiabetic drugs had better glycemic control in diabetics. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) data suggested that the antidiabetic activity of this formulation was via improvement of β-cell function. We also tested the safety of the B. pilosa formulation in healthy subjects and observed no obvious side effects. We conclude that B. pilosa has potential as an antidiabetes treatment.

1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is a global health problem that carries a large economic burden. According to the International Diabetes Foundation 382 million people were diagnosed with diabetes in 2013 and this number is expected to rise to 592 million by 2035 [1]. Current oral antidiabetic drugs have unmet efficacy and undesirable side effects in patients often leading to lethal complications [2]. Therefore, continuing the search for new diabetes treatments is a priority.

Over 1200 plants are purported to have antidiabetic activity [3, 4]. Among them, B. pilosa has long been used as an antidiabetic herb in Asia, America, and Africa [5]. However, no clinical trial has ever evaluated the efficacy and safety of this herb [3, 6]. We and other groups have shown that B. pilosa has hypoglycemic activity in diabetic db/db mice and alloxan-treated mice [7–9]. Three polyynes from B. pilosa were found to have glucose-lowering activity [8, 9]. Among them, cytopiloyne identified from B. pilosa had better glucose-reducing activities in diabetic mice than the other two polyynes [9]. We also demonstrated that B. pilosa and cytopiloyne lowered blood glucose via insulin secretion and islet protection [4]. Further, mechanistic studies showed that cytopiloyne and, probably, B. pilosa exerted antidiabetic action via their regulation of -cell function [4].

Despite some claims of human antidiabetic activity, there have been no modern clinical evaluations of B. pilosa in humans. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a B. pilosa formulation in human diabetic and healthy subjects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Efficacy Pilot Study

Fourteen volunteers whose fasting blood glucose was more than 126 mg/dL and/or whose 2 h postmeal prandial blood glucose was more than 200 mg/dL were diagnosed as diabetics based on the American Diabetes Association criteria. They were grouped into 2 groups. One group, 6 diabetics, only consumed the B. pilosa formulation (probetacell) orally at a dose of 400 mg, ter in die, for 3 to 7 months. The other group, 8 diabetics, took antidiabetic drugs plus the B. pilosa formulation. Their blood samples were collected before and after their treatment. Biochemical parameters of the blood samples from both groups were determined (Table 1) based on the manufacturers’ protocols. Briefly, triglyceride (TRIG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and blood urine nitrogen (BUN) were analyzed with 7600 Clinical Analyzer (Hitachi). Serum insulin was quantified with the ADVIA Centaur ELISA Kits (Siemens). was measured using a DCA 2000 analyzer (Bayer). The B. pilosa formulation (probetacell) is a commercial functional food in Taiwan (Chun-Yueh Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd.) and HPLC was used to control the quality of the formulations (see Sup. Figure 2 in Supplementary Material available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/832314).

Table 1: Selected biochemical parameters of diabetic subjects after administration with B. pilosa formulation for 3 to 7 months.

Parametersa
Age (yr)
Diabetic history (yr)
Treatment time (m)
FBG (mg/dL)b
HbA1c (%)

Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
P valued
Pretreatment
Posttreatment
Decreased ratioc
valued

BP without antidiabetic drugse ()
65.6 ± 10.5
7.0 ± 5.3
5.0 ± 2.0
201.7 ± 83.3
123.3 ± 18.6
0.33 ± 0.20
0.048
9.1 ± 1.7
7.2 ± 0.7
0.19 ± 0.07
0.033

BP with antidiabetic drugsf ()
61.3 ± 11.6
12.4 ± 6.3
3.6 ± 0.9
220 ± 70.9
150 ± 51.3
0.31 ± 0.14
0.040
8.6 ± 0.6
7.7 ± 0.7
0.10 ± 0.05
0.012

All data are presented as mean ± SD.

bFBG: fasting blood glucose.

cDecreased ratio = (value of pretreatment − value of posttreatment)/value of pretreatment.

dData are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation). Student’s -test was used for statistical analysis between pretreatment and posttreatment. The values (<0.05) are considered statistically significant.

eDiabetic patients only consumed BP supplement. The number () of volunteers is indicated.

fDiabetic patients consumed antidiabetic drugs and BP supplement (combination therapy). These antidiabetic drugs included metformin (Glucophage) dominantly and acarbose (Glucobay), glibenclamide (Euglucon), glimepiride (Amaryl), and insulin (NovoMix 30 or NPH human insulin/Humulin).

2.2. Safety Pilot Study

Blood from seven healthy volunteers was collected before and after they took the B. pilosa formulation (probetacell) orally at a daily dose of 400 mg per person, ter in die, for 3 months. The biochemical parameters (Table 2) of the blood samples were analyzed as above.

Table 2: Selected biochemical parameters of healthy volunteers after administration with the B. pilosa formulation for 3 months.

Parametersa
HbA1c (%)
FBG (mg/dL)
PBG (mg/dL)
Fasting insulin (mU/L)
Postprandial insulin (mU/L)
TRIG (mg/dL)
TC (mg/dL)
HDL-c (mg/dL)
LDL-c (mg/dL)
AST (U/L)
ALT (U/L)
BUN (mg/dL)
Creatinine (mg/dL)

Pretreatment 
()
5.4 ± 0.3
87.6 ± 2.3
111.6 ± 25.7
3.4 ± 1.4
12.5 ± 10.2
85.1 ± 36.0
168.4 ± 27.3
55.8 ± 10.6
86.4 ± 21.1
21.1 ± 7
15.7 ± 4.9
13 ± 3.1
0.8 ± 0.1

Posttreatment 
()
5.4 ± 0.3
90 ± 6.2
115.1 ± 31.3
4.9 ± 7.7
23.5 ± 16.4
71.6 ± 24.5
161.1 ± 20.9
53.3 ± 7
86.4 ± 19.5
17 ± 2
13.6 ± 3.6
13.4 ± 2.8
0.8 ± 0.1

valueb
0.86
0.35
0.82
0.62
0.16
0.43
0.58
0.61
1
0.16
0.36
0.8
0.83

Data from seven healthy volunteers are presented as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The number () of volunteers is indicated.

bStudent’s -test is used to compare the parameters before and after the volunteers took the B. pilosa formulation at a daily dose of 400 mg per person, ter in die. No statistical significance is found.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data from three independent experiments or more are presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s -test was used for statistical analysis of the differences between groups. A value () of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. B. pilosa Formulation Improves Type 2 Diabetes via Promotion of -Cell Function

Our group and others previously demonstrated that B. pilosa exerted antidiabetic activity in mouse models, so in this study we verified this effect in humans. First, we evaluated the beneficial effect of the B. pilosa formulation on subjects with type 2 diabetes. We found that those who only took the B. pilosa formulation had fasting blood glucose levels of and , respectively, before and after treatment with the B. pilosa formulation (Table 1). Similarly, the diabetics had levels of and , respectively, before and after the treatment with the B. pilosa formulation (Table 1). The HOMA-IR and HOMA- are commonly used to assess insulin resistance and -cell function, respectively [10]. Treatment with the B. pilosa formulation significantly increased -cell function of the participants as shown by the HOMA- values. In contrast, the treatment did not affect their insulin resistance, as shown by the HOMA-IR values (Sup. Figure 1). Accordingly, the B. pilosa formulation boosted serum insulin level in healthy persons (Table 2). Besides, we tested the combination effect of the B. pilosa formulation. We found that those who only took antidiabetic drugs and the B. pilosa formulation had fasting blood glucose levels of and , respectively, before and after the combination treatment (Table 1). However, the combination use of the B. pilosa formulation seemed better than its single use based on the data on the decreased ratio of fasting blood glucose and (Table 1).

Overall, the data from this study are in good agreement with previous studies in mice [4] that suggested that B. pilosa enhanced insulin secretion and islet preservation via -cell regulation.

3.2. B. pilosa Formulation Had No Obvious Side Effects

Next, we assessed the 90-day safety of the B. pilosa formulation in 7 diabetes-free volunteers. We found that 90-day administration with the B. pilosa formulation showed no obvious adverse effects (Table 2). In addition, heavy metals (As, Pb, Cd, and Hg) and 251 pesticides in the B. pilosa formulation used in the study were determined and their concentrations are below the limit of detection (Figure 1 and Sup. Table 1). The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations recognizes B. pilosa as a staple food [11]. The Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan also allows its use as an ingredient in food for human consumption. Previous studies by our group and others found no toxicity of B. pilosa in mouse models [5, 6] and rats [12]. However, comprehensive scientific study of the safety of B. pilosa has not been conducted. In this work, clinical data suggest that B. pilosa at 400 mg, ter in die, has no noticeable toxicity (Table 2). Large-scale clinical trials on the efficacy and toxicology of B. pilosa in humans are required prior to its further medical use.

Figure 1: Report on the contamination of pesticides and heavy metals in the B. pilosa formulation used in this study. The content of the pesticides and heavy metals in the B. pilosa formulation was determined and certificated by SGS Taiwan Ltd.

In summary, our clinical data demonstrated that the B. pilosa formulation had an antidiabetic action and no obvious side effects in humans. This action involves the regulation of -cells.

Abbreviations

: | Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c
FBG: | Fasting blood glucose
TRIG: | Triglycerides
TC: | Total cholesterol
HDL: | High density lipoprotein
LDL: | Low density lipoprotein
AST: | Aspartate aminotransferase
ALT: | Alanine aminotransferase
BUN: | Blood urine nitrogen.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. W. C. Yang for his constructive suggestions and Ms. Miranda Loney for her paper editing.

References

“IDF diabetes altas,” 2013, http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas

C. L. T. Chang, Y. Lin, A. P. Bartolome, Y. C. Chen, S. C. Chiu, and W. C. Yang, “Herbal therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: chemistry, biology, and potential application of selected plants and compounds,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 378657, 33 pages, 2013.

R. J. Marles and N. R. Farnsworth, “Antidiabetic plants and their active constituents,” Phytomedicine, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 137–189, 1995.

C. L. Chang, H. Y. Liu, T. F. Kuo et al., “Antidiabetic effect and mode of action of cytopiloyne,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 685642, 13 pages, 2013.

W.-C. Yang, “Botanical, pharmacological, phytochemical, and toxicological aspects of the antidiabetic plant Bidens Pilosa L,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 698617, 14 pages, 2014.

A. P. Bartolome, I. M. Villaseñor, and W. C. Yang, “Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae): botanical properties, traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 340215, 51 pages, 2013.

F. J. Alarcon-Aguilar, R. Roman-Ramos, J. L. Flores-Saenz, and F. Aguirre-Garcia, “Investigation on the hypoglycaemic effects of extracts of four Mexican medicinal plants in normal and alloxan-diabetic mice,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 383–386, 2002.

R. P. Ubillas, C. D. Mendez, S. D. Jolad et al., “Antihyperglycemic acetylenic glucosides from Bidens pilosa,” Planta Medica, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 82–83, 2000.

S.-C. Chien, P. H. Young, Y.-J. Hsu et al., “Anti-diabetic properties of three common Bidens pilosa variants in Taiwan,” Phytochemistry, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 1246–1254, 2009.

D. R. Matthews, J. P. Hosker, A. S. Rudenski, B. A. Naylor, D. F. Treacher, and R. C. Turner, “Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man,” Diabetologia, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 412–419, 1985.

P. H. Young, Y. J. Hsu, and C. W. Yang, “Bidens pilosa L. and its medicinal use,” in Recent progress in Medicinal Plants Drug Plant II, A. S. Awaad, V. K. Singh, and J. N. Govil, Eds., Standium Press LLC, 2010.

L. Frida, S. Rakotonirina, A. Rakotonirina, and J.-P. Savineau, “In vivo and in vitro effects of Bidens pilosa L. (asteraceae) leaf aqueous and ethanol extracts on primed-oestrogenized rat uterine muscle,” African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2008.