Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 7137362, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7137362

Review Article

Traditional Chinese Mind and Body Exercises for Promoting Balance Ability of Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Shihui Chen,¹ Yanjie Zhang,² Yong Tai Wang,³ and Xiao Lei Liu⁴

¹Department of Kinesiology, Texas A&M University Texarkana, TX, USA
²Department of Physical Education, Chinese University of HK, Shenzhen, China
³College of Nursing and Health Science, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA
⁴Department of Traditional Sports, Beijing Sports University, Beijing, China

Received 12 June 2016; Revised 8 October 2016; Accepted 13 October 2016

Academic Editor: Carmen Mannucci

Copyright © 2016 Shihui Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The purpose of this study was to provide a quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of traditional Chinese mind and body exercises in promoting balance ability for old adults. The eligible studies were extensively searched from electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, SportDicus, and Web of Science) until 10 May 2016. Reference lists of relevant publications were screened for future hits. The trials used randomized controlled approaches to compare the effects of traditional Chinese mind and body exercise (TCMBE) on balance ability of old adults that were included. The synthesized results of Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and static balance with 95% confidence intervals were counted under a random-effects model. Ten studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria, and a total of 1,798 participants were involved in this review. The results of the meta-analysis showed that TCMBE had no significant improvement on BBS and TUG, but the BBS and TUG could be obviously improved by prolonging the intervention time. In addition, the results showed that TCMBE could significantly improve the static balance compared to control group. In conclusion, old adults who practiced TCMBE with the time not less than 150 minutes per week for more than 15 weeks could promote the balance ability.

1. Introduction

Today, the issue of aging is a major public concern worldwide. According to recent population census [1], Chinese aged 60 years or older were more than 220 million, about 15% of the total population by the end of 2014. The numbers of old population will continue to grow and reach 437 million by 2051. The similar situation exists in the United States; for example, the numbers of population aged over 65 will reach 85 million by 2050 and will be doubled compared with the number in 2010 [2]. Many aging related studies showed health issues which increase prevalence of chronic diseases, complex medical conditions, and even loss of their independent functions [3–5]. Issue of aging brings serious economic burden to the society, of which the elderly’s health and medical related costs are the major expenditures for them [4, 6]. Participating in exercises and physical activities may have beneficial effects on the aging related chronic diseases and health conditions of elderly people. There is good evidence that appropriate physical exercise can effectively prevent the onset of noncommunicable diseases and can improve the health condition and fitness of elderly people [7]. Previous studies found that exercise therapy as nonpharmacological intervention may have beneficial effects on functional recovery, such as balance, strength, walking gait correction, and fall prevention [8–11].

Traditional Chinese mind and body exercises (TCMBE) include, for example, Tai Chi, Qigong, Baduanjin, or Yijinjing, all developed by ancient Chinese people. TCMBE as an effective, low-cost, and safety exercise approach is widely accepted in elderly people in China and other Asian countries [12–14]. During recent years, many studies reported that motor movements of elderly people were improved by participating in Tai Chi, Qigong, and Baduanjin [10, 15, 16]. Besides, Verhagen et al. [17] and Voukelatos et al. [18] reported that practicing Tai Chi can effectively reduce the falls of elderly people. Wenneberg et al. [19] provided evidence that persons who practice Qigong exercise could significantly improve their balance control abilities. The decline of balance function is the main reason of causing fall for the elderly [13]. Therefore, the TCMBE program may be an appropriate exercise to improve elderly people’s balance ability and reducing the risk of falls.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current research results of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of TCMBE on balance and the risk to fall in the healthy elderly. This study analyzed the effectiveness of TCMBE intervention program compared with control group (non-TCMBE) on balance ability in elderly populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline (PRISMA) was followed throughout this review and research processes. Four databases of literature had been used as data sources for this study from inception until 10 May, 2016 (Medline: 1946-, SportDicus: 1978-, Cinahl: 1992-, and Web of Science: 1900-). The two groups of terms were combined for the systematical search as follows: (1) “traditional Chinese exercise” OR “tai chi” OR “tai chi chuan” OR “taiji” OR “taijiquan” OR “qi gong” OR “chi kung” OR “Baduanjin” OR “Yijinjing”; AND (2) “balance” OR “balance control” OR “fall” OR “falls” OR “slip”. In addition to the database search, a manual search from the reference lists of identified articles and relevant articles was also applied. Further, additional studies were also found from many experts who were in the field of traditional Chinese exercise.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The included studies should meet the following criteria: (1) type of studies: the current research only applied randomized controlled trials; (2) participants: the study participants were healthy humans with age over 60 years; (3) interventions: the subjects of study must be related to a treatment group that only using traditional Chinese exercise and a control group involved in no TCMBE exercises or other treatment (e.g., wellness education, and resistance training). There must be different interventions between treatment group and control group (either passive or positive); (4) outcome measures: the outcomes were related to balance performance, for instance, Berg Balance Score (BBS) and Timed Up and Go Test (TUG); (5) providing adequate information for calculating effect size; (6) the fact that traditional Chinese exercise intervention period was no less than two months (8 weeks).

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

The studies were excluded if (1) there was no randomized assignment to study groups; (2) the trial used the Chinese exercise plus additional treatments (e.g., Tai Chi and stretch training in treatment group); (3) the presence of animal models or unhealthy participants (e.g., diabetic and stroke participants); (4) there is a lack of sufficient information to calculate the effect size; (5) they were questionnaire, case study, abstract, or reviews; and (6) the studies were published in non-English journals.

2.4. Selection of Studies

The literature searches were conducted by two authors. The two reviewers independently screened the potential articles by reading the titles and abstracts and then full-text articles according to the eligible criteria. Disagreements between two reviewers were resolved in discussion. If necessary, the third reviewer was consulted to reach a consensus.

2.5. Data Extraction

The following information from each article was extracted: (1) author and year of publication; (2) characteristic of the participants: sample size, sex, and age; (3) study design; (4) interventions; and (5) standardized mean, standard deviation, or raw data for effect size calculation. There were no disparities of data abstraction.

2.6. Quality Assessment

Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of study using the Jadad scale [20]. This scale has been widely applied in assessing methodological quality in exercise field [21, 22]. The scale includes three items: randomization (0–2 points), blinding (0–2 points), and withdrawals and dropouts (0-1 point). The range scores of Jadad were 0–5. A score higher than 3 points could be considered as high-quality studies.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used for meta-analysis. The -test and the I2-coefficient were used to examine heterogeneity between studies. If there is a statistic significant , it indicates differences of study heterogeneity. And the I2 statistic was used to measure the effect of heterogeneity with low (25%), moderate (50%), and high (75%) respectively [23]. The fixed-effects model was conducted to pool ESs with 95% confidence interval (CI), if the heterogeneity was not found. Otherwise, the random-effects model was adopted. Eventually, the publication bias was examined through using the Egger regression asymmetry test and Begg’s funnel plot.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

Figure 1 shows the flow diagram of the study selection process. A total of 2,184 articles were found in Medline, CINAHL, SportDicus, and Web of Science. After removing duplications, 1169 articles were eliminated, and 1134 articles were further excluded after screening the titles and abstracts. The remaining studies () were reviewed for eligibility through reading the full-texts. Finally, 10 studies (12 trials, two studies included two eligible trails) were included in the present review [12, 16, 24–31].

Figure 1: Flow diagram for selection of studies.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The main characteristics of eligibility studies are summarized in Table 1. All included articles were published between 2003 and 2015, and they aimed to measure the effectiveness of traditional Chinese mind and body exercise on balance or fall prevention among healthy old adults. A total of 1,798 participants were involved in 10 studies. The sample size ranged from 40 to 702 participants. Three types of interventions were used: eight studies (10 trials) used Tai Chi, one study used Tai Chi + Qigong [27], and one study used Baduanjin [16].

Table 1: Characteristics of eligible studies in current meta-analysis.

Author and year
Subjects
Duration
Design
Intervention
Outcome
Key findings

Control
Experiment

Li et al. 2005

Age: 70–92  
Gender: 77M, 179F
24 w
RCT
Stretching
60 minutes, 3 times per week
Tai Chi
60 minutes, 3 times per week
BBS
TUG
The score of BBS and TUG was improved in the Tai Chi group compared to the stretching group

Zhang et al. 2006

Age: ≥60  
Gender: 25M, 24F
8 w
RCT
Continue their current level of physical activity
Tai Chi
60 minutes, 7 times per week
One-leg balance
TCC training group significantly improved in one-leg balance compared to daily activities

Pereira et al. 2008

Age: 60–82  
Gender: 77F
12 w
RCT
Doing their daily activities
Tai Chi
50 minutes, 3 times per week
Unipodal position test
TC had an increase in unipodal position compared to control group

Kim et al. 2009

Age: 65–87  
Gender: 20M, 20F
12 w
RCT
Wellness education
60 minutes, per week
Tai Chi
60 minutes, 3 times per week
Center of pressure
TC had a greater COP compared to wellness education

Logghe et al. 2009

Age: ≥70  
Gender: 78M, 191F
13 w
RCT
Usual care
Tai Chi + Chi Kung
60 minutes, twice per week
BBS
No difference

Taylor-Piliae et al. 2010 Trial 1

Age: 60–84  
Gender: 40M, 92F
24 w
RCT
Attend-control
90 minutes, once per week
Tai Chi
45 minutes, twice per week
Single-leg stance
Tai Chi had greater improvements compared to control group

Taylor-Piliae et al. 2010 Trial 2

Age: 60–84  
Gender: 40M, 92F
24 w
RCT
Western exercise
45 minutes, 3 times per week
Tai Chi
45 minutes, twice per week
Single-leg stance
Tai Chi had greater improvements compared to WE

Nguyen and Kruse 2012

Age: 60–79  
Gender: 48M, 48F
24 w
RCT
Daily activities
Tai Chi
60 minutes, twice per week
TUG
TUG in TC group is significantly improved compared to daily activities

Taylor et al. 2012 Trial 1

Age: ≥65  
Gender: 182M, 502F
20 w
RCT
Low-level exercise
60 minutes, once per week
Tai Chi
60 minutes, once per week
TUG
No difference

Taylor et al. 2012 Trial 2

Age: ≥65  
Gender: 182M, 502F
20 w
RCT
Low-level exercise
60 minutes, once per week
Tai Chi
60 minutes, twice per week
TUG
No difference

Tousignant et al. 2012

Age: ≥65  
Gender: 41M, 111F
15 w
RCT
Physiotherapy intervention
Baduanjin
60 minutes, twice per week
BBS
TUG
No difference

Son et al. 2016

Age: 65–83  
Gender: 50F
12 w
RCT
Otago exercise
60 minutes, twice per week
Tai Chi
60 minutes, twice per week
TUG
OLS
Otago group exhibited a greater improvement in TUG compared to TC group; TC group showed greater improvement in OLS compared to Otago group

Note: TC: Tai Chi; TUG: Timed Up and Go Test; BBS: Berg Balance Score; OLS: One-leg-standing.

3.3. Risk of Bias within Studies

The main risks of bias of the included studies are summarized in Table 2. It indicated that six trials had a high bias risk and six trials had a low bias risk based on the Jadad scale recommendation. All of the studies used the randomized allocation, but three studies reported using appropriate randomization methods, and the rest studies used appropriate double blinding or double blinding. In addition, most trials from these studies explicitly stated the number of withdrawals or the reasons for dropout. Both passive and active control group are included in the selected studies, and the ordinary intervention (not TCMBE) or other treatment (e.g., wellness education, and resistance training) was used for the control group. Eight trials used regular daily exercise [24–26, 28–31] and four trials used the wellness education, regular daily care exercises, and regular physiotherapy intervention [12, 16, 27, 31]. The detailed conditions and activities arranged for the control group are listed in Table 1.

Table 2: Quality assessment of included studies.

Author and year
Randomization
Double blinding
Withdrawals
Appropriate randomization
Appropriate double blinding
Total

Li et al. 2005
1
0
1
1
0
3

Zhang et al. 2006
1
0
1
0
0
2

Pereira et al. 2008
1
0
1
0
0
2

Kim et al. 2009
1
0
0
0
0
1

Logghe et al. 2009
1
1
1
0
1
4

Taylor-Piliae et al. 2010 Trial 1
1
0
1
0
0
2

Taylor-Piliae et al. 2010 Trial 2
1
0
1
0
0
2

Nguyen and Kruse 2012
1
0
1
0
0
2

Taylor et al. 2012 Trial 1
1
0
1
1
1
4

Taylor et al. 2012 Trial 2
1
0
1
1
1
4

Tousignant et al. 2012
1
0
1
0
1
3

Son et al.2016
1
0
1
1
1
4

3.4. Synthesis of Results and Berg Balance Scale

In this meta-analysis the main outcome measures were Berg Balance Scale (BBS); Timed Up and Go Test (TUG); and static balance. Figure 2 shows the forest plot of the meta-analysis. Three trials stated the BBS for old people, and a random-effects model was used due to the high heterogeneity: , , and %. The pooled results indicated that there was no significant improvement on BBS in favor of elderly people practicing the traditional Chinese exercise (TCMBE): ES = 0.164, 95% CI (−0.199, 0.526), , and .

Figure 2: The effect of TCMBE versus control on BBS for the elderly.

3.5. Timed Up and Go Test

There were seven trials in which the TUG was conducted in this meta-analysis. According to estimating the synthesis results, significant heterogeneity was found among the eligible seven trials, , , and %, and then a random-effects model was conducted to calculate the effect size. Figure 3 shows the forest plot of the analysis. The pooled results did not indicate any effect of TCMBE on TUG for the elderly: ES = 0.28, 95% CI (−0.01, 0.57), , and .

Figure 3: The effect of TCMBE versus control on TUG for the elderly.

3.6. Static Balance

Static balance was reported in six trials in this meta-analysis. After calculating the pooled results in Figure 4, it gives a significant heterogeneity: , , and %, so the random-effects model was suited for this analysis. It demonstrated that the static balance ability of the elderly in TCMBE group was significantly improved compared to the control group: ES = 0.70, 95% CI (0.03, 0.35), , and .

Figure 4: The effect of TCMBE versus control on static balance for the elderly.

3.7. Publication Bias

In aspect of TUG and static balance, the nonsignificant results of Egger’s test stated no publication bias with and , respectively. But the two funnel plots were not symmetrical (Figures 5 and 6). The possible reason for unsymmetrical plot may be because of the heterogeneity among the included studies rather than publication bias.

Figure 5: Funnel plot (TUG).

Figure 6: Funnel plot (static balance).

3.8. Subgroup Analysis

Due to the significant heterogeneity in BBS, TUG, and static balance, three subgroup analyses were performed to compare the different intervention period (less than 15 weeks and more than 15 weeks) and different exercise time per week (≤90 minutes, around 120 minutes, and ≥180 minutes). To perform the subgroup analysis, the random-effects model was used. The forest plots of the subgroup analysis were shown in Figures 7–9.

Figure 7: Subgroup meta-analysis: the effect of TCMBE versus control on BBS for elderly TUG.

Figure 8: Subgroup meta-analysis: the effect of TCMBE versus control on TUG for the elderly.

Figure 9: Subgroup meta-analysis: the effect of TCMBE versus control on static balance for the elderly.

Firstly, there was no difference in TCMBE group on BBS compared with control group in intervention period (, ). However, the potential result was longer period (≥15 weeks) and TCMBE had an effect on BBS (ES = 0.32, ). Secondly, it indicated TCMBE group had no effect on TUG compared with control group based on the different duration time (, ). There also was a trend that long period (≥15 weeks) TCMBE play a positive effect on TUG. Finally, no group difference in exercise time per week (, ) was found. But the evidenced result was that if the participants took a longer time (≥150 minutes per week) to participate in TCMBE, they could improve their static balance power.

4. Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of TCMBE intervention compared with control group (non-TCMBE activity) on balance ability and risk to fall for old adults. We found that (1) there was no effect on BBS by using the TCMBE, based on the synthesis ESs of 3 randomized controlled trials; (2) TCMBE intervention did not significantly improve old adults’ TUG though displaying the pooled ESs of seven randomized controlled trials; and (3) there was a significant improvement on static balance power, in particular, if the subjects participate in the TCMBE program for more than 150 minutes per week. These findings seem to be different from the previous meta-analysis [8, 14, 32], in which Tai Chi intervention significantly improved the BBS and TUG compared with control group. The current study includes more eligible trials using the TCMBE interventions and its characteristics are homogenous compared to previous meta-analysis, such that if one study has three different groups, we use the TCMBE group to compare with the other two groups, respectively. Besides, the previous review included the participants with diseases, such as stoke, dementia, and Parkinson’s. Our study used the healthy population without any disease. In addition, the current review firstly evidenced the effect of TCMBE on static balance ability for old adults though meta-analysis.

Because of the high heterogeneity in meta-analysis, we conducted subgroup meta-analysis to investigate the reasons of heterogeneity. The intervention time (≥15 weeks) of participants participating in the TCMBE showed significantly effect on BBS and TUG for old adults ( = 0.001 and = 0.02, resp.). There was significantly improved static balance for old adults if the time they participated in the TCMBE was not less than 150 minutes per week (). Therefore, more senior people are encouraged to take part in the TCMBE program with long practicing time every week in order to achieve the benefits of the TCMBE exercise.

This meta-analysis study has few limitations that may influence the findings; for example, there are 50 percent of trials that are classified as high bias risk based on the Jadad scale. The present review only consists of English publications. The varied TCMBE sessions per week and the different measurement parameters were used in original studies. Moreover, in original studies some participants dropped out the experiment at the end of the trial; the number of participants at the postintervention was used to assess the ESs. This systematic review and meta-analysis did not evaluate the long-term beneficial effects of TCMBE on balance for the elderly after the end of intervention. It is expected that more studies are needed to confirm the findings in the future.

5. Conclusion

In summary, the time old adults participated in the TCMBE program more than 150 minutes per week for more than 15 weeks can promote their balance ability. Therefore, the traditional Chinese mind and body exercise training program can be introduced to the public as an alternative rehabilitation treatment for old adults to promote their balance ability.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

NBC, China Aged Care Industry Report, 2014–2017, 2015, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/china-aged-care-industry-report-2014-2017-300089774.html.

L. A. Jacobsen, M. Kent, M. Lee, and M. Mather, America's aging population, Population Bulletin, 2011, http://www.prb.org/pdf11/aging-in-america.pdf

D. J. Macfarlane, K. L. Chou, and W. K. Cheng, “Effects of Tai Chi on the physical and psychological well-being of Chinese older women,” Original Article, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2004.

X. Z. Lan, The Aging Problem of China, 2007, http://www.bjreview.com.cn/lianghui/txt/2007-03/14/content_59110.htm.

T. M. Dall, P. D. Gallo, R. Chakrabarti, T. West, A. P. Semilla, and M. V. Storm, “An aging population and growing disease burden will require a large and specialized health care workforce by,” Health Affairs, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2013–2020, 2013.

J. Zhang and J. Chaaban, “The economic cost of physical inactivity in China,” Preventive Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 75–78, 2013.

E. G. Lakatta and D. Levy, “Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part II: the aging heart in health: links to heart disease,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 346–354, 2003.

B.-L. Chen, J.-B. Guo, M.-S. Liu et al., “Effect of traditional Chinese exercise on gait and balance for stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0135932, 2015.

P. Scuffham, S. Chaplin, and R. Legood, “Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 740–744, 2003.

M. S. Lee, K. W. Chen, K. M. Sancier, and E. Ernst, “Qigong for cancer treatment: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 717–722, 2007.

T. Zhang, “Chinese stroke rehabilitation guide,” Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 301–318, 2012.

H.-D. Kim, J.-T. Han, and Y.-H. Cho, “The effectiveness of community-based Tai Chi training on balance control during stair descent by older adults,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 317–323, 2009.

P. A. Harmer and F. Li, “Tai Chi and falls prevention in older people,” Medicine and Sport Science, vol. 52, pp. 124–134, 2008.

Y. Zhao and Y. Wang, “Tai Chi as an intervention to reduce falls and improve balance function in the elderly: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Chinese Nursing Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2016.

A. I. Greenspan, S. L. Wolf, M. E. Kelley, and M. O'Grady, “Tai chi and perceived health status in older adults who are transitionally frail: a randomized controlled trial,” Physical Therapy, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 525–535, 2007.

M. Tousignant, H. Corriveau, P.-M. Roy et al., “The effect of supervised Tai Chi intervention compared to a physiotherapy program on fall-related clinical outcomes: a randomized clinical trial,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 196–201, 2012.

A. P. Verhagen, M. Immink, A. van der Meulen, and S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra, “The efficacy of Tai Chi Chuan in older adults: a systematic review,” Family Practice, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2004.

A. Voukelatos, R. G. Cumming, S. R. Lord, and C. Rissel, “A randomized, controlled trial of tai chi for the prevention of falls: the central Sydney tai chi trial,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1185–1191, 2007.

S. Wenneberg, L.-G. Gunnarsson, and G. Ahlström, “Using a novel exercise programme for patients with muscular dystrophy—part II: A Quantitative Study,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 595–602, 2004.

A. R. Jadad, R. A. Moore, D. Carroll et al., “Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?” Controlled Clinical Trials, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1996.

A. R. Aladro-Gonzalvo, M. Machado-Díaz, J. Moncada-Jiménez, J. Hernández-Elizondo, and G. Araya-Vargas, “The effect of Pilates exercises on body composition: a systematic review,” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2012.

M. S. Lee, M. H. Pittler, and E. Ernst, “Tai chi for osteoarthritis: a systematic review,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2008.

J. P. T. Higgins, S. G. Thompson, J. J. Deeks, and D. G. Altman, “Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses,” British Medical Journal, vol. 327, no. 7414, pp. 557–560, 2003.

F. Li, P. Harmer, K. J. Fisher et al., “Tai Chi and fall reductions in older adults: a randomized controlled trial,” Journals of Gerontology—Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 2005.

J.-G. Zhang, K. Ishikawa-Takata, H. Yamazaki, T. Morita, and T. Ohta, “The effects of Tai Chi Chuan on physiological function and fear of falling in the less robust elderly: an intervention study for preventing falls,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 107–116, 2006.

M. M. Pereira, R. J. de Oliveira, M. A. F. Silva, L. H. R. Souza, and L. G. Vianna, “Effects of Tai Chi Chuan on knee extensor muscle strength and balance in elderly women,” Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–126, 2008.

I. H. J. Logghe, P. E. M. Zeeuwe, A. P. Verhagen et al., “Lack of effect of tai chi chuan in preventing falls in elderly people living at home: a randomized clinical trial,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 70–75, 2009.

M. H. Nguyen and A. Kruse, “The effects of Tai Chi training on physical fitness, perceived health, and blood pressure in elderly Vietnamese,” Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 7–16, 2012.

D. Taylor, L. Hale, P. Schluter et al., “Effectiveness of Tai Chi as a community-based falls prevention intervention: a randomized controlled trial,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 841–848, 2012.

N. Son, Y. U. Ryu, H. Jeong, Y. Jang, and H. Kim, “Comparison of 2 different exercise approaches: Tai Chi Versus Otago, in Community-Dwelling Older Women,” Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 51–57, 2016.

R. E. Taylor-Piliae, K. A. Newell, R. Cherin, M. J. Lee, A. C. King, and W. L. Haskell, “Effects of Tai Chi and Western exercise on physical and cognitive functioning in healthy community-dwelling older adults,” Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 261–279, 2010.

Y. Huang and X. Liu, “Improvement of balance control ability and flexibility in the elderly Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) practitioners: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 2014.