Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 9185935, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9185935

Research Article

Cytotoxic Activity of Extracts from Plants of Central Argentina on Sensitive and Multidrug-Resistant Leukemia Cells: Isolation of an Active Principle from Gaillardia megapotamica

María Laura González,¹ Mariana Belén Joray,¹ Jerónimo Laiolo,¹ María Inés Crespo,¹ Sara María Palacios,¹ Gustavo Miguel Ruiz,² and María Cecilia Carpinella¹

¹Fine Chemical and Natural Products Laboratory, School of Chemistry, IRNASUS-CONICET, Catholic University of Córdoba, Avda. Armada Argentina 3555, X5016DHK Córdoba, Argentina
²Herbarium Marcelino Sayago, School of Agricultural Science, Catholic University of Córdoba, Avda. Armada Argentina 3555, X5016DHK Córdoba, Argentina

Correspondence should be addressed to María Cecilia Carpinella; ceciliacarpinella@ucc.edu.ar

Received 12 October 2017; Revised 20 February 2018; Accepted 26 March 2018; Published 10 May 2018

Academic Editor: Yoshiyuki Kimura

Copyright © 2018 María Laura González et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Plants are a significant reservoir of cytotoxic agents, including compounds with the ability to interfere with multidrug-resistant (MDR) cells. With the aim of finding promising candidates for chemotherapy, 91 native and naturalized plants collected from the central region of Argentina were screened for their cytotoxic effect toward sensitive and MDR P-glycoprotein (P-gp) overexpressing human leukemia cells by means of MTT assays. The ethanol extracts obtained from Aldama tucumanensis, Ambrosia elatior, Baccharis artemisioides, Baccharis coridifolia, Dimerostemma aspilioides, Gaillardia megapotamica, and Vernonanthura nudiflora presented outstanding antiproliferative activity at 50 μg/mL, with inhibitory values from 93 to 100%, when tested on the acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line CCRF-CEM and the resistant derivative CEM-ADR5000, while 70–90% inhibition was observed against the chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell K562 and its corresponding resistant subline, Lucena 1. Subsequent investigation showed these extracts to possess marked cytotoxicity with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.37 to 29.44 μg/mL, with most of them being below 7 μg/mL and with ALL cells, including the drug-resistant phenotype, being the most affected. G. megapotamica extract found to be one of the most effective and bioguided fractionation yielded helenalin (1). The sesquiterpene lactone displayed IC₅₀ values of 0.63, 0.19, 0.74, and 0.16 μg/mL against K562, CCRF-CEM, Lucena 1, and CEM/ADR5000, respectively. These results support the potential of these extracts as a source of compounds for treating sensitive and multidrug-resistant leukemia cells and support compound 1 as a lead for developing effective anticancer agents.

1. Introduction

Leukemia is a malignant disorder with a significant number of deaths annually [1]. According to GLOBOCAN, about 352,000 new cases of leukemia and 265,000 deaths occurred worldwide in 2012 [2].

Despite overall improvement in the outcome of conventional leukemia therapies [3, 4], some patients have poor survival rates [5] or suffer from side effects of the drugs administered [3, 4, 6], and relapse is often observed [7]. In addition, a major problem in the treatment of leukemia is the development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Many cancers, including leukemia, are resistant to a wide array of chemically and functionally unrelated agents, a phenomenon known as multidrug resistance (MDR).

Various mechanisms underlie this type of resistance, the most common being overexpression of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter (ABCB1/MDR1) [8]. This protein, located in the cell membranes, is involved in the traffic of chemotherapeutic drugs outside the cancer cell [6] or in the sequestration of these in cytoplasmic organelles, preventing their therapeutic effect [9]. More than a third of cells from patients with leukemia were positive to P-gp [10]. High levels of this pump were detected in about 50% of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) unresponsive to chemotherapy [11], while 12 and 29% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) showed high and intermediate P-gp expression, respectively [12]. For these reasons, academy and industry still concentrate on finding promising candidates for an effective and safe therapy for leukemia.

A considerable number of plants have been recognized with rich potential as a therapeutic resource, and many of their derived molecules were active on leukemia cells, including resistant phenotypes [6]. Many compounds with medicinal properties have been obtained from flora from Argentina [8, 13–16], but this resource is far from being completely explored.

The present work reports antiproliferative activity on sensitive and P-gp overexpressing leukemia cell lines of a panel of 91 extracts obtained from native and naturalized plants of Central Argentina. One of the most potent extracts, Gaillardia megapotamica, was submitted to bioguided fractionation to further isolate the active principle responsible for its cytotoxicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Extract Preparation

Plants were collected in the hills of Córdoba Province, Argentina, from November to March 2016-2017. Voucher specimens have been deposited in the “Marcelino Sayago” Herbarium of the School of Agricultural Science, Catholic University of Córdoba, and were authenticated by the botanist, G. Ruiz. Plants were selected according to their availability, accessibility, and especially the lack of scientific information about their activity and/or chemical pattern. Crushed, air-dried material (200 g) was extracted by 48 h maceration with 700 mL of 96% ethanol. The yields of each active extract, obtained after exhaustive solvent removal and expressed as percentage weight of air-dried crushed plant material, are shown in Table 2. The phytochemical profiles of the active extracts were obtained by HPLC (see supplementary material (available here)). Extract solutions were prepared immediately prior to testing.

2.2. Chemicals, Equipment, and Reagents

3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and lectin from Phaseolus vulgaris (PHA) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St Louis, MO). Doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX, 99.8%, Synbias Pharma Ltd.) was obtained from Nanox Release Technology (Buenos Aires, Argentina) and was used dissolved in bidistilled water. RPMI-1640 and cell culture reagents Gibco® were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). Sterile plastic material was purchased from Greiner Bio-One (Frickenhausen, Germany). All solvents were HPLC grade. ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR and two-dimensional spectra were recorded with a Bruker AVANCE II 400 spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Ettlingen, Germany) with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as the internal reference. HPLC was performed on a Shimadzu LC-10 AS (Shimadzu Corp., Tokyo, Japan), equipped with a Luna C18, 250 × 4.6 mm reversed-phase column. The mobile phases were ACN/H₂O 30 : 70, ACN/H₂O 10 : 90, and ACN/H₂O 70 : 30 with UV detection at 210 and 280 nm.

2.3. Bioguided Isolation of the Active Principle from Gaillardia megapotamica

The cytotoxic ethanol extract of G. megapotamica (4 g) was initially subjected to vacuum liquid chromatography on silica gel (622 g, 63–200 m, 11.0 Å~24.0 cm; Macherey & Nagel) eluted with a step gradient of hexane/diethyl ether (Et₂O)/methanol (MeOH) to yield 12 fractions, which were combined in 8 groups according to their thin layer chromatography (TLC) profile (F1 to F8). Fractions F1 to F5 and F7 and F8 were not active at the tested concentration (10 μg/mL), while fraction F6, eluted with 100% Et₂O, demonstrated cytotoxic effect at this concentration. Therefore, F6 was further processed by radial preparative chromatography using an isocratic mobile phase of hexane/Et₂O 30 : 70. The fractions obtained were combined in 10 groups in accordance with the TLC analysis (F6-1 to F6-10). From fraction F6-6, a pure compound 1 was obtained by spontaneous crystallization (Rt = 9.65, 98.2% purity, by HPLC). This compound, the remaining F6-6, and the rest of the fractions were further tested for their cytotoxic activity at 10 μg/mL. Only 1 exerted a toxic effect at this concentration. According to ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra (copies of the original spectra are obtainable from the corresponding author), the compound was identified as the sesquiterpene lactone helenalin C₁₅H₁₈O₄ (1; 262) [41] (yield 0.79 g/100 g of dried and crushed plant material, by HPLC) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Chemical structure of helenalin (1).

2.4. Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

The cytotoxicity of plant extracts was tested on acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) CCRF-CEM cells [42] and on CML K562 cells [43] and their MDR P-gp overexpressing variants, CEM/ADR5000 and Lucena 1, respectively [8, 44]. Cell lines were routinely maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Natacor, Córdoba, Argentina), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA), and 100 g/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA) in a 5% CO₂ humidified atmosphere at 37°C.

As previously described, CEM/ADR5000 cells were exposed once a week to doses of DOX, gradually increasing from 1.7 to 8.6 μM. The latter concentration was then used for cell maintenance [44, 45]. Lucena 1 were continuously cultured in the presence of 60 nM DOX in order to maintain P-gp overexpression [8]. Both cell lines were grown in drug-free medium 3-4 days before the experiments. Cells were subcultured twice a week and used before the 20th passage. All experiments were performed with cells in the logarithmic growth phase, with cell viabilities over 90%, determined by trypan blue staining.

2.5. Cell Proliferation Assay

To investigate the cytotoxic potential of the extracts, fractions, and the pure compound, the MTT colorimetric assay was performed [46]. Briefly, 5 × 10⁴ cells, suspended in 100 μL of growth medium, were seeded in 96-well plates containing 100 μL of medium in the presence of each tested extract, fraction, or compound previously dissolved in DMSO (final concentration 1% v/v since no adverse effects on cell growth were observed at this concentration). The extracts were evaluated at a final concentration of 50 μg/mL. Following the primary screening, those extracts with promising activity on all studied cells were tested at serial dilutions ranging from 50 to 0.012 μg/mL. The isolated compound was tested at 0.005–10 μg/mL. After 48 or 72 h for CML or ALL, respectively, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL solution of MTT in sterile PBS was added to each well and further incubated for 4 h. Then, the supernatants were removed and replaced with 100 μL DMSO to solubilize the resulting purple formazan crystals produced from metabolically viable cells. Absorbance was measured with an iMark microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA) at 595 nm. Two wells were used for each sample assayed and three independent experiments were performed.

Untreated and DMSO (1%)-treated cells were used as controls, while DOX (added to reach final concentrations of 0.003 to 40 μg/mL) was used as reference. The percentage of cytotoxic activity was determined by the following formula: cytotoxicity (%) = [1 − (optical density of treated cells-optical density DMSO)/(optical density of control cells-optical density DMSO)] × 100.

Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀), the concentrations of the tested samples required to inhibit 50% cell proliferation, were calculated from the mean values of data from wells. Resistance factors (RF) were calculated by dividing the IC₅₀ of resistant cells by the IC₅₀ of the corresponding sensitive cell line [47].

2.6. Cytotoxicity on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)

The cytotoxicity of the extracts on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was evaluated by MTT assay [46]. PBMC were collected from fresh heparinized blood and separated by density gradient centrifugation (Ficoll®) as described by Rennó et al. [48]. As the current study required samples from healthy human volunteer donors, ethical approval was provided by the Catholic University of Córdoba Research Ethics Board. Signed informed consent was obtained from donors. For the cytotoxicity assay, 1 × 10⁵ PBMC/well was incubated in duplicate in 96-well plates with PHA 10 μg/mL, in the presence of increasing concentrations of the extracts (0.05–50 μg/mL) or 1% DMSO for 48 h. Absorbance (Abs) and percentage of cytotoxicity were determined as described above and the IC₅₀ values were calculated.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± SE. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-tailed unpaired test using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Prism 5.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA), with values ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. IC₅₀s were calculated by GraphPad Prism software, responding to at least five concentrations of each extract at the 95% confidence level with upper and lower confidence limits.

3. Results and Discussion

With the aim of finding new agents capable of interfering with the proliferation of sensitive and MDR leukemia cells, 91 ethanol extracts obtained from different plant species of Central Argentina were primarily assayed at a fixed concentration of 50 μg/mL against a panel of cells consisting of CCRF-CEM and K562 and their respective P-gp overexpressing counterparts, CEM/ADR5000 and Lucena 1. The ethanol extracts obtained from Aldama tucumanensis, Ambrosia elatior, Baccharis artemisioides, Baccharis coridifolia, Dimerostemma aspilioides, Gaillardia megapotamica, and Vernonanthura nudiflora inhibited proliferation by 93–100% in ALL cell lines while 70–90% inhibition was observed in the CML cells (Table 1). As observed, all the active species belong to Asteraceae. This could be due to more than a third of the studied plants being Asteraceae (35%) while the remaining 65% were Amaranthaceae (1%), Apiaceae (1%), Apocynaceae (1%), Aristolochiaceae (1%), Asclepiadaceae (1%), Bignoniaceae (4%), Boraginaceae (1%), Capparaceae (1%), Chenopodiaceae (1%), Dipsacaceae (1%), Euphorbiaceae (2%), Fabaceae (8%), Lamiaceae (8%), Lomariopsidaceae (1%), Loranthaceae (1%), Malvaceae (4%), Meliaceae (1%), Papaveraceae (1%), Poaceae (4%), Polygalaceae (1%), Ranunculaceae (1%), Rhamnaceae (1%), Rosaceae (2%), Rutaceae (1%), Santalaceae (1%), Schizaeaceae (1%), Solanaceae (3%), Verbenaceae (4%), and Zygophyllaceae (1%). Sesquiterpene lactones are characteristic compounds among Asteraceae [49] and many of these exhibit cytotoxic properties [50, 51]. It is interesting that Mandevilla pentlandiana and Microliabum candidum displayed a complete inhibitory effect on the proliferation of both ALL cell lines with moderate activity on CML cell lines (Table 1). Bibliographic information about the traditional uses, biological activity, and chemical constituents of the most active plants is listed in Table 2.

Table 1: Antiproliferative activity of extracts obtained from native and naturalized plants of central Argentina.

Species
Cytotoxicity (%)

CCRF-CEM
CEM/ADR5000
K562
Lucena

Acacia aroma Gillies ex Hook. & Arn
21 ± 6
63 ± 6
0
0

Acacia atramentaria Benth.
23 ± 2
20 ± 3
0
0

Acalypha communis Müll. Arg.
12 ± 1
16 ± 2
14 ± 7
18 ± 6

Acanthostyles buniifolius (Hook. & Arn.) R. M. King & H. Rob.)
100
90 ± 5
52 ± 3
41 ± 4

Achyrocline satureioides (Lam.) DC.
74 ± 1
45 ± 21
0
8 ± 2

Achyrocline tomentosa Rusby
100
78 ± 5
18 ± 8
42 ± 6

Aldama tucumanensis (Hook. & Arn.) E. E. Schill. & Panero
100
95 ± 1
74 ± 5
70 ± 2

Aloysia citriodora Palau
7 ± 2
9 ± 2
0
0

Aloysia gratissima (Gillies & Hook.) Tronc.
67 ± 4
31 ± 5
3 ± 1
0

Ambrosia elatior L.
97 ± 0
95 ± 0
81 ± 0
72 ± 3

Amphilophium carolinae (Lindl.) L. G. Lohmann
0
10 ± 11
14 ± 8
5 ± 5

Anemia tomentosa (Savigny) Sw.
1 ± 2
14 ± 6
0
15 ± 2

Araujia brachystephana (Griseb.) Fontella & Goyder
0
25 ± 6
15 ± 1
6 ± 4

Argemone subfusiformis G. B. Ownbey
0
18 ± 1
2 ± 4
7 ± 4

Aristolochia argentina Griseb.
68 ± 0
100
69 ± 1
57 ± 11

Artemisia annua L.
87 ± 2
74 ± 1
40 ± 2
48 ± 3

Artemisia verlotorum Lamotte
88 ± 3
76 ± 3
16 ± 10
58 ± 3

Astragalus distinens Macloskie
0
29 ± 3
1 ± 1
12 ± 0

Baccharis artemisioides Hook. & Arn.
93 ± 3
100
79 ± 0
78 ± 3

Baccharis coridifolia DC.
100
94 ± 1
77 ± 0
75 ± 1

Baccharis flabellata Hook. & Arn.
100
58 ± 10
27 ± 1
10 ± 4

Baccharis linearifolia (Lam.) Pers.
83 ± 10
53 ± 11
0
21 ± 9

Baccharis salicifolia (Ruiz et Pav.) Pers.
26 ± 2
26 ± 6
8 ± 9
0

Bidens pilosa L.
5 ± 7
0
23 ± 6
0

Cantinoa mutabilis (Rich.) Harley & J. F. B. Pastore
85 ± 6
99 ± 9
21 ± 8
23 ± 2

Capparis amisquea Kuntze
0
9 ± 2
18 ± 4
6 ± 1

Chromolaena hookeriana (Griseb.) R. M. King & H. Rob.
14 ± 13
10 ± 10
0
0

Condalia microphylla Cav.
19 ± 3
0
0
0

Cortaderia speciosa (Nees & Meyen) Stapf
11 ± 12
3 ± 3
0
6 ± 1

Cotoneaster glaucophyllus Franch.
0
0
19 ± 1
10 ± 3

Croton lachnostachyus Baill.
16 ± 8
39 ± 3
36 ± 3
40 ± 4

Cynoglossum amabile Stapf & J. R. Drumm.
0
22 ± 2
16 ± 2
9 ± 1

Dalea elegans Hook. & Arn.
47 ± 8
20 ± 3
3 ± 5
20 ± 6

Dimerostemma aspilioides (Griseb.) M. D. Moraes
96 ± 0
97 ± 1
90 ± 1
85 ± 1

Dipsacus fullonum L.
0
7 ± 2
18 ± 2
14 ± 2

Dolichandra cynanchoides Cham.
0
11 ± 1
0
10 ± 8

Dolichandra unguis-cati (L.) L. G. Lohmann
8 ± 9
16 ± 4
7 ± 4
5 ± 4

Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants
12 ± 12
14 ± 11
0
0

Elaphoglosum lorentzii (Hieron.) H. Christ
40 ± 10
8 ± 3
0
0

Eryngium horridum Malme
0
18 ± 3
10 ± 2
0

Flourensia campestris Griseb.
83 ± 3
71 ± 4
18 ± 6
13 ± 5

Flourensia oolepis S. F. Blake
100
80 ± 3
15 ± 2
8 ± 5

Gaillardia megapotamica (Spreng.) Baker
100
100
80 ± 2
78 ± 3

Gomphrena pulchella Mart.
0
0
0
0

Grindelia pulchella Dunal
77 ± 12
91 ± 4
72 ± 2
82 ± 1

Jarava ichu Ruiz et Pav.
39 ± 2
11 ± 11
3 ± 3
0

Jodina rhombifolia (Hook. & Arn.) Reissek
33 ± 2
30 ± 6
8 ± 3
17 ± 1

Kageneckia lanceolata Ruiz & Pav.
68 ± 11
33 ± 2
6 ± 3
16 ± 3

Lantana grisebachii Seckt
96 ± 18
52 ± 12
27 ± 10
68 ± 1

Lepechinia floribunda (Benth.) Epling
100
84 ± 4
1 ± 5
1 ± 1

Lepechinia meyenii (Walp.) Epling
95 ± 0
92 ± 2
38 ± 13
31 ± 30

Lessingianthus mollissimus (Hook. & Arn.) H. Rob.
6 ± 2
25 ± 2
4 ± 5
0

Ligaria cuneifolia (Ruiz & Pav.) Tiegh.
15 ± 4
38 ± 2
13 ± 2
0

Lippia turbinata Griseb.
0
27 ± 18
15 ± 3
5 ± 7

Lithrea molleoides (Vell.) Engl.
100
52 ± 14
0
0

Lorentzianthus viscidus (Hook. & Arn.) R. M. King & H. Rob.
67 ± 15
18 ± 7
0
0

Mandevilla pentlandiana (A. DC.) Woodson
100
100
71 ± 4
60 ± 5

Marrubium vulgare L.
29 ± 9
40 ± 10
16 ± 7
11 ± 0

Melia azedarach L.
84 ± 1
11 ± 2
38 ± 12
0

Melinis repens (Willd.) Zizka
9 ± 7
14 ± 3
0
2 ± 2

Melissa officinalis L.
0
19 ± 29
0
0

Microliabum candidum (Griseb.) H. Rob.
100
100
72 ± 12
63 ± 14

Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) Epling
16 ± 8
55 ± 2
12 ± 11
6 ± 2

Monnina dictyocarpa Griseb.
30 ± 21
46 ± 14
8 ± 10
0

Ophryosporus charua (Griseb.) Hieron.
47 ± 14
33 ± 3
23 ± 4
36 ± 3

Pascalia glauca Ortega
27 ± 15
35 ± 3
12 ± 1
23 ± 1

Pavonia aurigloba Krapov. & Cristóbal
5 ± 3
15 ± 3
5 ± 1
0

Podranea ricasoliana (Tanfani) Sprague
40 ± 10
6 ± 6
0
26 ± 3

Porlieria microphylla (Baill.) Descole, O’Donell & Lourteig
6 ± 8
0
6 ± 8
0

Prosopis alba Griseb.
0
0
0
0

Prosopis sp.
4 ± 10
0
0
0

Pterocaulon alopecuroides (Lam.) DC
87 ± 3
87 ± 2
0
4 ± 2

Pyrostegia venusta (Ker Gawl.) Miers
10 ± 3
11 ± 1
21 ± 1
0

Ruprechtia apetala Wedd.
22 ± 7
15 ± 15
14 ± 7
1 ± 4

Salvia cuspidata Ruiz & Pav.
100
90 ± 8
14 ± 4
64 ± 0

Schizachyrium condensatum (Kunth) Nees
33 ± 3
34 ± 3
0
0

Senecio madagascariensis Poir.
14 ± 14
23 ± 4
22 ± 2
3 ± 6

Senecio viravira Hieron.
44 ± 26
47 ± 2
6 ± 3
0

Senna aphylla (Cav.) H. S. Irwin et Barneby
1 ± 2
22 ± 1
7 ± 3
10 ± 3

Sida rhombifolia L.
21 ± 5
1 ± 1
39 ± 4
0

Solanum argentinum Bitter & Lillo
53 ± 15
0
14 ± 14
17 ± 1

Solanum palinacanthum Dunal
76 ± 13
12 ± 1
64 ± 3
0

Solanum sisymbriifolium Lam.
81 ± 16
0
48 ± 1
0

Sphaeralcea cordobensis Krapov.
34 ± 11
1 ± 1
0
0

Sphaeralcea cordobensis sp. mutant Krapov.
21 ± 12
4 ± 4
7 ± 2
0

Tagetes minuta L.
26 ± 4
0
0
0

Thalictrum decipiens Boivin
13 ± 8
3 ± 3
0
9 ± 4

Thelesperma megapotamicum (Spreng.) Kuntze
37 ± 9
58 ± 12
0
5 ± 2

Trichocline reptans (Wedd.) Hieron.
10 ± 3
0
0
3 ± 0

Vernonanthura nudiflora (Less.) H. Rob.
100
96 ± 1
89 ± 4
78 ± 1

Wedelia buphtalmiflora Lorentz
5 ± 5
7 ± 5
2 ± 2
24 ± 2

Zanthoxylum coco Hook. f. & Arn.
11 ± 4
11 ± 9
87 ± 1
0

Extracts were tested at 50 μg/mL. Values are expressed as mean ± SE.

Table 2: Native plants from Central Argentina showing antiproliferative activity.

Plant species
Yield (%); voucher: UCCOR
number
Common name
Traditional uses/in vitro reported activities
Reported

Aldama tucumanensis (Asteraceae)
13.6; 186
-
Antirheumatic [17]/NR
Clerod-14-ene-3α,4β,13ε-triol; annuolide A; 17,18-dihydroleptocarpin; acetyl-17,18-dihydroleptocarpin; tomentosin; dihydroniveusin B; roseostachenone; leptocarpin; eupatolide; dihydroniveusin A; niveusin A; oplopanone; scoparone;
12β-ethoxy-ent-kaur-9(ll),16-dien-19-oic acid [18].
Kaurenic acid [19].

Ambrosia elatior  
(Asteraceae)
2.2; 215
altamisa
Contraceptive [20].
Headache; expectorant [21]/Antiprotozoal [22].
Cumanin [22].
4ß,10α-alloaromadendrane; psilostachyin; psilostachyin C; psilostachyin B;
dihydroparthenolide;
hispidulin [23]. Isochlorogenic acid; chlorogenic acid
[24]. 6α-Hydroxyeudesm-4(15)-ene-9β-O-anisate, 1β-hidroxy eudesma-4,11(13)-dien-12-oic acid; damsinic acid; 1β,6α-dihydroxyeudesm- 4(15)-ene [25].

Baccharis artemisioides  
(Asteraceae)
2.8; 142
Romerillo blanco
NR/Inhibition of germination [26].

Verrucarin A; verrucarin J; roridin A; roridin D; roridin E [27].
Bartemidiolide [28].
Deoxybartemidiolide [29].

Baccharis coridifolia  
(Asteraceae)
2.2; 147
Mio-mio
Pesticide [21]/Germination inhibition [26]. Antifeedant [30].
Verrucarin A; verrucarin J; roridin A; roridin D; roridin E; roridin H [27].
Schottenol glucoside [31].

Dimerostemma aspilioides  
(Asteraceae)
5.5; 246

NR/Inhibition of germination [26].
Tomenphantin A [32].

Gaillardia megapotamica var. radiata  (Asteraceae)
13.76; 127
topasaire
Antialopecic, dandruff, seborrhoea [21, 33]. Antineuralgic, against headache [21]/Antifungal [34]. Ant foraging inhibitor [35].
Helenalin; nepetin; luteolin; mexicanin; 2ß-hydroxy-2,3-dihydrohelenalin [36, 37].
Dehydroleucodine [38].

Vernonanthura nudiflora (Asteraceae)
7.2; 129
-
NR/Antifeedant [30]
Vernudiflorid [39]. Glaucolide A; glaucolide B; lupeol; β-amyrin; α-amyrin; germanicol; sitosterol; stigmasterol; genkwanin; velutin; apigenin; (4R, 8S, lOR)-l-oxo-4-hydrox-8-tiglyloxy-13-acetoxygermacra-5E,7(13)-dien-6,12-olide; (4R, 8S, lOR)-1,4-epoxy-8-tiglyloxy-l0-hydroxy-l3-acetoxygermacra-1,5E,7(13)-trien-6,12-olide; (lR,4R. 5R, 8S, lOR)-1,4-epoxy-l-ethoxy-5-hydroxy-8- methacryloxy-13-acetoxygermacra-SE, 7(11)-dien-6,12-olide; (1S, 4R, 5S, 6S, 8S, 10R)-1,4-dihydroxy-5,10,13-triacetoxy 8-tiglyloxy-cadin-7(11)-en-6,12-olide; 8-tiglyloxycadin-7(11)-en-6,12-olide; (1S, 4R, 8S, 10R)-1,4-epoxy 8,10-diacetoxy-l-formyloxy-13-hydroxygermacra-5E,7(11)-dien-6,12-olide  [40].

NR: not reported. compounds described are those reported in organic extracts.

These active extracts were further assessed for their IC₅₀ values in order to determine their level of effectiveness. As observed in Table 3, IC₅₀ ranged from 0.37 to 29.44 μg/mL. All extracts, except A. tucumanensis and A. elatior against CML cell lines, showed a strong cytotoxic effect with IC₅₀ values lower than 20 μg/mL. This value is the threshold established by the National Cancer Institute (USA, NCI) plant screening program for an extract to be considered active following an incubation period of 48 and 72 h [52]. As observed, most of them showed IC₅₀ values lower than 7 μg/mL. The G. megapotamica and D. aspilioides extracts were the most effective among those with less toxic effect on PBMC.

Table 3: Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of most effective extracts.

Species
IC₅₀ (μg/mL) (mean ± SE)

CCRF-CEM
CEM/ADR5000
RF
K562
Lucena 1
RF
PBMC

Aldama tucumanensis
5.39 ± 0.2
17.56 ± 0.5
3.26
20.24 ± 1.2
29.44 ± 5.8
1.45
9.13 ± 1.84

Ambrosia elatior
5.84 ± 1.0
2.73 ± 0.6
0.47
19.16 ± 2.4
21.93 ± 2.9
1.14
4.01 ± 0.67

Baccharis artemisioides
1.15 ± 0.1
0.94 ± 0.2
0.82
1.90 ± 0.3
5.74 ± 0.1
3.02
0.95 ± 0.21

Baccharis coridifolia
0.37 ± 0.0
5.89 ± 0.8
15.92
0.51 ± 0.0
1.08 ± 0.1
2.12
0.08 ± 0.01

Dimerostemma aspilioides
1.60 ± 0.0
1.18 ± 0.3
0.74
6.89 ± 0.5
10.38 ± 1.1
1.51
2.69 ± 0.53

Gaillardia megapotamica
0.70 ± 0.0
1.21 ± 0.00
1.73
2.77 ± 0.0
5.95 ± 0.1
2.15
2.76 ± 0.52

Vernonanthura nudiflora
2.21 ± 0.0
6.38 ± 0.2
2.89
6.41 ± 0.9
10.76 ± 0.7
1.68
13.70 ± 1.06

doxorubicin
0.07 ± 0.000
>4
>571
0.78 ± 0.1
22.99 ± 1.1
29.47
0.39 ± 0.02

Results represent the mean ± SE. Means followed by the same letter in each row were not significantly different (Tukey, ). Statistical comparisons between extracts and doxorubicin were analyzed by one-tailed unpaired test. indicates , indicates , and indicates . Statistical comparisons between leukemia cells with respect to PBMC were analyzed by ANOVA-Tukey’s multiple comparison test. indicates , indicates , and indicates .

The A. elatior extract was highly specific, since it showed outstanding proliferation-inhibiting properties against ALL cells but not against CML cells . The extract obtained from D. aspilioides, although active against all the cell lines, also induced specific cytotoxic activity, being more effective on ALL cell lines than on CML cells . B. artemisioides and B. coridifolia extracts were highly potent, being equally active against almost all the assayed cell lines, with IC₅₀ values from 0.37 to 5.89 μg/mL, and at the same time were the most toxic against PBMC. Most of the extracts showed significantly different cytotoxic effects with respect to DOX, with the same or lower activity in the case of CCRF-CEM and K562, but the same or greater effectiveness in the resistant cells, CEM/ADR5000 and Lucena 1. The latter were >570-fold and 29-fold more resistant to DOX than their parental cell lines, CCRF-CEM and K562, respectively (Table 3).

It is remarkable that extracts from A. elatior and D. aspilioides displayed collateral sensitivity (CS) with CEM/ADR5000 compared to the parental cell line CCRF-CEM (degree of resistance 0.47 and 0.74, resp.) and lack of cross-resistance regarding Lucena 1. Except B. coridifolia, to which both P-gp overexpressing cells showed cross-resistance, the rest of the extracts showed this phenomenon only in one resistant cell. This classification is taken into consideration following Hall et al., [53] who defined RF values ≥ 2 as significant cross-resistance toward a compound, while values lower than 1 indicate a CS agent.

As mentioned, G. megapotamica was identified as one of the most active species. After submitting this plant to bioguided isolation, helenalin (1) was obtained. This sesquiterpene lactone showed outstanding IC₅₀ values against K562 cells and their MDR counterpart Lucena 1 of and  μg/mL, respectively ( and  μM, resp.) while and  μg/mL were obtained against CCRF-CEM and its respective drug-resistant phenotype CEM/ADR5000 ( and  μM, resp.). In coincidence with the results obtained for the complete extract, ALL cells were more sensitive to compound 1 than CML cells.

Although none of these most active species have been subjected to bioguided isolation to obtain their cytotoxic principles, there is some related information regarding toxicity on cancer cells of some of their constituents. Leptocarpin, present in A. tucumanensis, displayed cytotoxic activity against HT-29, PC-3, DU-145, MDA-MB-231, and MCF7 cells, with IC₅₀ values in the range of 0.72 to 2.32 μg/mL, by inducing apoptotic death [54]. The values show that this compound can be considered as active, based on the 4 μg/mL cutoff established by the NCI to identify good cytotoxic compounds [55]. Eupatolide, a germacranolide sesquiterpene lactone also found in this plant, showed potent cytotoxic activity with an IC₅₀ of 0.47 μg/mL against H.Ep.-2 cell line [56]. The flavonoid hispidulin, present in A. elatior, has been tested for cytotoxic activity against Jurkat E6-1, GLC4, and COLO320 cells, showing IC₅₀ ranging from 10.21 to 24.62 μg/mL [57, 58]. Other constituents of this plant, dihydroparthenolide and psilostachyin, were reported as inactive when tested against KB cells [59]; the same as was found for damsinic acid tested against U937, Jurkat and Molt 4 [60], while psilostachyin C showed no effectiveness against HeLa, MCF-7, or A431 cell lines [61] but was slightly effective against BW5147 cells, with an IC₅₀ value of 4.89 μg/mL [62]. Chlorogenic acid showed IC₅₀ values ranging from 1.8–10.7 μg/mL against HepG2, Hep2, HCT116, RD, and MCF7 [63].

All the Argentinian plants of B. coridifolia and most of B. artemisioides studied by Rizzo et al. [27] were positive for the fungal macrocyclic trichothecenes roridins E and H and verrucarins A and J, which showed strong cytotoxic activity with IC₅₀ of 0.0018, 0.0055,0.0012 and 0.0022 μg/mL, respectively against H4TG cells [64]. When tested against Hep-2, verrucarin A showed an IC₅₀ value of 0.002 μg/mL [65] while verrucarins A, J and roridin E were active in the range from 0.0005 to 0.0042 μg/mL against KB and BC1 cells [66]. The compound schottenol glucoside, present in B. coridifolia, demonstrated a toxic effect against KB cells with an IC₅₀ value of 2.7 μg/mL [31]. The germacranolide tomenphantin A, isolated from D. aspilioides, showed moderate activity against KB cells, with an IC₅₀ of 3.0 μg/mL [67].

Some sesquiterpene lactones, among them helenalin and mexicanin, were obtained from G. megapotamica. Helenalin, with a mean cytotoxic activity of 0.10 μg/mL against EN2 cells [68] induced apoptosis in Jurkat T cells [69] and inhibited human telomerase activity [70], among other toxic effects in cancer cells [71]. The activity reported in this work toward the resistant cell lines makes this compound attractive as a starting point for obtaining effective cytotoxics against multidrug-resistant cells. Mexicanin showed outstanding toxic effects with an IC₅₀ of 0.14 μg/mL against EN2 cells [68]. Dehydroleucodine exhibited cytotoxicity against a panel of tumor cells, including eight leukemia cell lines, with IC₅₀ ranging from 1.22 to 4.62 μg/mL [72], and luteolin showed IC₅₀ of 11.70 and 9.30 μg/mL against GLC4 and COLO320 cells, respectively [57]. V. nudiflora contains many inactive compounds, such as genkwanin, with an IC₅₀ against KB and P388 cells of 8.7 and 10 μg/mL, respectively [73] and germanicol, with IC₅₀ 29.5 and 35.6 μg/mL against HCT 116 and A549 cell lines, respectively [74], as well as the effective compound velutin (IC₅₀ = 1.5 μg/mL against KB cells) [73]. In addition, apigenin showed IC₅₀ values from 7.29 to 16.39 μg/mL against Jurkat E6-1, GLC4, and COLO320 cell lines [57, 58]. A mixture of sitosterol and stigmasterol exhibited no cytotoxic effects against P-388 and HT-29 up to a concentration of 50 μg/mL [75].

4. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that compound 1, isolated from G. megapotamica, is a promising cytotoxic with outstanding activity against K562 and CCRF-CEM and their respective MDR counterparts, Lucena 1 and CEM/ADR5000. This identifies this sesquiterpene lactone as an important lead for obtaining therapeutics to act against resistant leukemia cells.

The outstanding antileukemia effect of D. aspilioides and the scant information about its components and the hypersensitivity of resistant CEM/ADR5000 cells toward its extract merit further investigation to obtain potential candidates for improving leukemia chemotherapies, especially against resistant phenotypes.

Abbreviations

ALL: | Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
CML: | Chronic myelogenous leukemia
CS: | Collateral sensitivity
IC₅₀: | Half-maximal inhibitory concentration
MDR: | Multidrug resistance
MTT: | 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide
PBMC: | Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
P-gp: | P-glycoprotein
RF: | Resistance factor.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Roemmers Foundation, the Catholic University of Córdoba, MINCyT Córdoba (PID 2012), CONICET (PIP 2011-2013 and PIP 2014-2016), and FONCyT (PICT 2014-1594). CEM/ADR5000 and Lucena 1 were generous gifts from Dr. T. Efferth (Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany) and from Dr. V. Rumjanek (Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), respectively. The authors thank Joss Heywood for revising the English language. María Laura González, María Inés Crespo, and Jerónimo Laiolo acknowledge receipt of a Scholarship from CONICET. María Cecilia Carpinella, Mariana Belén Joray, and Sara María Palacios are staff members of the National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET).

Supplementary Materials

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fingerprints with UV detection at 210 and 280 nm and UV spectra of Aldama tucumanensis, Ambrosia elatior, Baccharis artemisioides, Baccharis coridifolia, Dimerostemma aspilioides, Gaillardia megapotamica, and Vernonanthura nudiflora extracts are shown. Analytical HPLC profile of the isolated compound, helenalin, with UV detection at 210 nm is also shown. (Supplementary Materials)

References

J.-J. Lin, H.-Y. Hsu, J.-S. Yang et al., “Molecular evidence of anti-leukemia activity of gypenosides on human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells in vitro and in vivo using a HL-60 cells murine xenograft model,” Phytomedicine, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 1075–1085, 2011.

J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. Dikshit et al., “Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. E359–E386, 2014.

S. D. Cramer, P. D. Aplan, and S. K. Durum, “Therapeutic targeting of IL-7Rα signaling pathways in ALL treatment,” Blood, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 473–478, 2016.

J. F. Apperley, “Chronic myeloid leukaemia,” The Lancet, vol. 385, no. 9976, pp. 1447–1459, 2015.

S. S. Fard, M. J. Tehrani, and A. M. Ardekani, “Prostaglandin E2 induces growth inhibition, apoptosis and differentiation in T and B cell-derived acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines (CCRF-CEM and Nalm-6),” Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2012.

R. Senthilkumar, B.-A. Chen, X.-H. Cai, and R. Fu, “Anticancer and multidrug-resistance reversing potential of traditional medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds in leukemia cell lines,” Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 881–894, 2014.

M. S. Topp, P. Kufer, and N. Gökbuget, “Targeted therapy with the T-cell—engaging antibody blinatumomab of chemotherapy-refractory minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients results in high response rate and prolonged leukemia-free survival,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 2493–2498, 2011.

M. L. González, D. Mariano A. Vera, J. Laiolo et al., “Mechanism underlying the reversal of drug resistance in P-glycoprotein-expressing leukemia cells by pinoresinol and the study of a derivative,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, article no. 205, 2017.

P. Ferrao, P. Sincock, S. Cole, and L. Ashman, “Intracellular P-gp contributes to functional drug efflux and resistance in acute myeloid leukaemia,” Leukemia Research, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 395–405, 2001.

G. Szakács, J. K. Paterson, J. A. Ludwig, C. Booth-Genthe, and M. M. Gottesman, “Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 219–234, 2006.

Y. Kuwazuru, A. Yoshimura, S. Hanada et al., “Expression of the multidrug transporter, P-glycoprotein, in chronic myelogenous leukaemia cells in blast crisis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 1990.

M. Filipits, T. Stranzl, G. Pohl et al., “Drug resistance factors in acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative analysis,” Leukemia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 68–76, 2000.

M. B. Joray, M. R. del Rollán, G. M. Ruiz, S. M. Palacios, and M. C. Carpinella, “Antibacterial activity of extracts from plants of central Argentina—isolation of an active principle from Achyrocline satureioides,” Planta Medica, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 95–100, 2011.

M. E. Chiari, M. B. Joray, G. Ruiz, S. M. Palacios, and M. C. Carpinella, “Tyrosinase inhibitory activity of native plants from central Argentina: isolation of an active principle from Lithrea molleoides,” Food Chemistry, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2010.

M. E. Chiari, L. Tosoni, M. B. E. Joray et al., “The inhibitory activity of plants from central Argentina on p-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Isolation and mechanism of inhibition of a flavanone from Flourensia oolepis,” Planta Medica, vol. 81, no. 15, pp. 1382–1391, 2015.

M. B. Joray, F. Villafañez, M. L. González et al., “P53 tumor suppressor is required for efficient execution of the death program following treatment with a cytotoxic limonoid obtained from Melia azedarach,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 109, pp. 888–897, 2017.

G. C. Giberti, “Herbal folk medicine in northwestern Argentina: compositae,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–341, 1983.

K. M. Meragelman, L. A. Espinar, V. E. Sosa, M. L. Uriburu, and J. R. De La Fuente, “Terpenoid constituents of Viguiera tucumanensis,” Phytochemistry, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 499–502, 1996.

C. E. Vaccarini, S. M. Palacios, K. M. Meragelman, and V. E. Sosa, “Antifeedant activity of metabolites from Viguiera tucumanensis,” Natural Product Research (Formerly Natural Product Letters), vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 323–327, 2002.

G. Schmeda-Hirschmann and E. Bordas, “Paraguayan medicinal compositae,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 163–171, 1990.

M. E. Goleniowski, G. A. Bongiovanni, L. Palacio, C. O. Nuñez, and J. J. Cantero, “Medicinal plants from the “Sierra de Comechingones”, Argentina,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 324–341, 2006.

V. P. Sülsen, S. I. Cazorla, F. M. Frank et al., “Natural terpenoids from Ambrosia species are active in vitro and in vivo against human pathogenic trypanosomatids,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e2494, 2013.

G. L. Silva, J. C. Oberti, and W. Herz, “Sesquiterpene lactones and other constituents of argentine Ambrosia species,” Phytochemistry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 859–861, 1992.

E. L. Rice, “Inhibition of nitrogen-fixing and nitrifying bacteria by seed plants IV. The inhibitors produced by Ambrosia elatior and A. psilostachya,” The Southwestern Naturalist, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 248, 1965.

T. Ohmoto, S. Nomura, M. Shimizu, S. Saito, and K. Ikeda, “Studies on the Sesquiterpenes from Ambrosia elatior LINNÉ,” Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 2272–2279, 1987.

S. M. Palacios, S. del Corral, M. C. Carpinella, and G. Ruiz, “Screening for natural inhibitors of germination and seedling growth in native plants from Central Argentina,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 674–677, 2010.

I. Rizzo, E. Varsavky, M. Haidukowski, and H. Frade, “Macrocyclic trichothecenes in Baccharis coridifolia plants and endophytes and Baccharis artemisioides plants,” Toxicon, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 753–757, 1997.

C. E. Tonn, O. S. Giordano, R. Bessalle, F. Frolow, and D. Lavie, “The structure of bartemidiolide, a clerodane-type diterpene from Baccharis artemisioides,” Phytochemistry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 489–491, 1988.

C. E. Tonn, O. S. Giordano, J. D. Martín, and V. S. Martín, “Deoxybartemidiolide, a clerodane-type diterpene from Baccharis artemisioides,” Phytochemistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1537-1538, 1989.

S. Del Corral, G. N. D. Napal, M. Zaragoza, M. C. Carpinella, G. Ruiz, and S. M. Palacios, “Screening for extracts with insect antifeedant properties in native plants from central Argentina,” Bol Latinoamer Caribe Plant Med Aromat, vol. 13, pp. 498–505, 2014.

M. Arisawa, A. D. Kinghorn, G. A. Cordell, C. H. Phoebe, and N. R. Fansworth, “Plant anticancer agents XXXVI. Schottenol glucoside from Baccharis coridifolia and Ipomopsis aggregata,” Planta Medica, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 544-545, 1985.

G. L. Silva, R. R. Gil, V. E. Sosa, and A. R. Suárez, “Structural and conformation analysis of sesquiterpene lactones by proton nuclear magnetic resonance,” Phytochemical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 258–262, 1992.

L. Del Vitto, E. Petenatti, and M. Petenatti, “Recursos herbolarios de San Luis (República Argentina),” 1a Parte: Plantas nativas, pp. 49–66, 1997, Multequina.

L. Svetaz, F. Zuljan, M. Derita et al., “Value of the ethnomedical information for the discovery of plants with antifungal properties. A survey among seven Latin American countries,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 137–158, 2010.

G. N. Diaz Napal, L. M. Buffa, L. C. Nolli et al., “Screening of native plants from central Argentina against the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lundi (Guérin) and its symbiotic fungus,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 76, pp. 275–280, 2015.

E. M. Petenatti, M. J. Pestchanker, L. A. Del Vitto, and E. Guerreiro, “Chemotoxonomy of the Argentinian species of Gaillardia,” Phytochemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1367-1368, 1996.

E. Lozano, P. Barrera, R. Salinas et al., “Sesquiterpene lactones and the diterpene 5-epi-icetexone affect the intracellular and extracellular stages of Trypanosoma cruzi,” Parasitology International, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 628–633, 2012.

V. Jimenez, U. Kemmerling, R. Paredes, J. D. Maya, M. A. Sosa, and N. Galanti, “Natural sesquiterpene lactones induce programmed cell death in Trypanosoma cruzi: a new therapeutic target?” Phytomedicine, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1411–1418, 2014.

C. Y. Looi, B. Moharram, and M. Paydar, “Induction of apoptosis in melanoma A375 cells by a chloroform fraction of Centratherum anthelminticum (L.) seeds involves NF-kappaB, p53 and Bcl-2-controlled mitochondrial signaling pathways,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 166, 2013.

A. Bardón, N. I. Kamiya, C. A. De Ponce De Léon, C. A. N. Catalán, J. G. Díaz, and W. Herz, “Glaucolides and related sesquiterpene lactones from Vernonia nudiflora and Chrysolaena propinqua,” Phytochemistry, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 609–613, 1992.

U. Rychlewska, M. Buděšínský, B. Szczepanska, E. Błoszyk, and M. Holub, “Two Crystalline Forms of Sesquiterpene Lactone Helenalin—X-Ray and NMR Study,” Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 276–299, 1995.

T. Efferth, M. Davey, A. Olbrich, G. Rücker, E. Gebhart, and R. Davey, “Activity of drugs from traditional chinese medicine toward sensitive and MDR1- or MRP1-overexpressing multidrug-resistant human CCRF-CEM leukemia cells,” Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 160–168, 2002.

V. M. Rumjanek, R. S. Vidal, and R. C. Maia, “Multidrug resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia: how much can we learn from MDR-CML cell lines?” Bioscience Reports, vol. 33, no. 6, Article ID e00081, 2013.

A. Kimmig, V. Gekeler, M. Neumann et al., “Susceptibility of multidrug-resistant human leukemia cell lines to human interleukin 2-activated killer-cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 50, no. 21, pp. 6793–6799, 1990.

M. Saeed, H. Khalid, Y. Sugimoto, and T. Efferth, “The lignan, (-)-sesamin reveals cytotoxicity toward cancer cells: pharmacogenomic determination of genes associated with sensitivity or resistance,” Phytomedicine, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 689–696, 2014.

M. B. Joray, L. D. Trucco, M. L. González et al., “Antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of compounds isolated from Flourensia oolepis,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 912484, 11 pages, 2015.

M. E. M. Saeed, H. Abdelgadir, Y. Sugimoto, H. E. Khalid, and T. Efferth, “Cytotoxicity of 35 medicinal plants from Sudan towards sensitive and multidrug-resistant cancer cells,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 174, pp. 644–658, 2015.

M. N. Rennó, G. M. Barbosa, P. Zancan et al., “Crude ethanol extract from babassu (Orbignya speciosa): cytotoxicity on tumoral and non-tumoral cell lines,” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 467–476, 2008.

F. C. Seaman, “Sesquiterpene lactones as taxonomic characters in the asteraceae,” The Botanical Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 121–594, 1982.

D. Chaturvedi, “Sesquiterpene lactones: structural diversity and their biological activities,” in Opportunity, Challanges and Scope of Natural Products in Medicinal Chemistry, pp. 313–334, Research Signpost, Trivandrum, India, 2011.

A. Ghantous, H. Gali-Muhtasib, H. Vuorela, N. A. Saliba, and N. Darwiche, “What made sesquiterpene lactones reach cancer clinical trials?” Drug Discovery Therapy, vol. 15, no. 15-16, pp. 668–678, 2010.

A. S. Sufian, K. Ramasamy, N. Ahmat, Z. A. Zakaria, and M. I. M. Yusof, “Isolation and identification of antibacterial and cytotoxic compounds from the leaves of Muntingia calabura L,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 198–204, 2013.

M. D. Hall, M. D. Handley, and M. M. Gottesman, “Is resistance useless? Multidrug resistance and collateral sensitivity,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 546–556, 2009.

C. Bosio, G. Tomasoni, R. Martínez, A. F. Olea, H. Carrasco, and J. Villena, “Cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of leptocarpin, a plant-derived sesquiterpene lactone, on human cancer cell lines,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 242, pp. 415–421, 2015.

V. Kuete, P. Y. Ango, and S. O. Yeboah, “Cytotoxicity of four Aframomum species (A. arundinaceum, A. alboviolaceum, A. kayserianum and A. polyanthum) towards multi-factorial drug resistant cancer cell lines,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 340, 2014.

K. Lee, H. Furukawa, H. Huang, and E. Huang, “Antitumor agents II: Eupatolide, a new cytotoxic principle from eupatorium formosanum hay,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 629–631, 1972.

H. J. Woerdenbag, I. Merfort, C. M. Passreiter et al., “Cytotoxicity of flavonoids and sesquiterpene lactones from Arnica species against the GLC4 and the COLO 320 cell lines,” Planta Medica, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 434–437, 1994.

K. Plochmann, G. Korte, E. Koutsilieri et al., “Structure-activity relationships of flavonoid-induced cytotoxicity on human leukemia cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 460, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2007.

E. Bianchi, C. C. J. Culvenor, and J. W. Loder, “Psilostachyin, a cytotoxic constituent of Ambrosia artemsisiifolia L,” Australian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1109–1111, 1968.

M. De Leo, M. B. V. Saltos, B. F. N. Puente, N. De Tommasi, and A. Braca, “Sesquiterpenes and diterpenes from Ambrosia arborescens,” Phytochemistry, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 804–809, 2010.

Q.-F. Chen, Z.-P. Liu, and F.-P. Wang, “Natural sesquiterpenoids as cytotoxic anticancer agents,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 1153–1164, 2011.

R. Martino, M. F. Beer, O. Elso, O. Donadel, V. Sülsen, and C. Anesini, “Sesquiterpene lactones from Ambrosia spp. are active against a murine lymphoma cell line by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest,” Toxicology in Vitro, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1529–1536, 2015.

A. Mira and K. Shimizu, “In vitro cytotoxic activities and molecular mechanisms of angelica shikokiana extract and its isolated compounds,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 11, no. 44, p. 564, 2015.

H. K. Abbas, B. B. Johnson, W. T. Shier, H. Tak, B. B. Jarvis, and C. D. Boyette, “Phytotoxicity and mammalian cytotoxicity of macrocyclic trichothecene mycotoxins from Myrothecium verrucaria,” Phytochemistry, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 309–313, 2002.

K. E. von Milczewski, “Toxicity of epoxy trichothecenes in cultured mammalian cells,” Mycotoxin Research, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 69–76, 1987.

M. Isaka, J. Punya, Y. Lertwerawat, M. Tanticharoen, and Y. Thebtaranonth, “Antimalarial activity of macrocyclic trichothecenes isolated from the fungus Myrothecium verrucaria,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 329–331, 1999.

T. Hayashi, T. Nakano, M. Kozuka, D. R. McPhail, A. T. McPhail, and K.-H. Lee, “Antitumor agents. 190.1 Absolute stereochemistry of the cytotoxic germacranolides, tomenphantins A and B, from Elephantopus tomentosus,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 302–304, 1999.

A. C. Beekman, H. J. Woerdenbag, W. Van Uden et al., “Structure-cytotoxicity relationships of some helenanolide-type sesquiterpene lactones,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 252–257, 1997.

V. M. Dirsch, A. M. Vollmar, and H. Stuppner, “Helenalin triggers a CD95 death receptor-independent apoptosis that is not affected by overexpression of Bcl-xL or Bcl-2,” Cancer Research, vol. 61, no. 15, pp. 5817–5823, 2001.

P. R. Huang, Y. M. Yeh, and T. C. V. Wang, “Potent inhibition of human telomerase by helenalin,” Cancer Letters, vol. 227, no. 2, pp. 169–174, 2005.

K. M. Fernandes, C. A. Auld, R. G. Hopkins, and R. F. Morrison, “Helenalin-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of p21(Cip1) inhibits 3T3-L1 preadipocyte proliferation,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 913–921, 2008.

P. E. Ordóñez, K. K. Sharma, L. M. Bystrom et al., “Dehydroleucodine, a sesquiterpene lactone from Gynoxys verrucosa, demonstrates cytotoxic activity against human leukemia cells,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 691–696, 2016.

A. Zahir, A. Jossang, B. Bodo, J. Provost, J.-P. Cosson, and T. Sévenet, “DNA topoisomerase I inhibitors: cytotoxic flavones from Lethedon tannaensis,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 701–703, 1996.

C. Y. Ragasa, D. L. Espineli, and C.-C. Shen, “Cytotoxic triterpene from Barringtonia asiatica,” Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 529–533, 2014.

J.-J. Chen, S.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Duh, I.-S. Chen, T.-C. Wang, and H.-Y. Fang, “A new cytotoxic amide from the stem wood of Hibiscus tiliaceus,” Planta Medica, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 935–938, 2006.