Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 7282681, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7282681

Research Article

Spectrum-Effect Relationship between UPLC Fingerprints and Antilung Cancer Effect of Si Jun Zi Tang

Xiaowei Zhou,¹ Ying Li,¹ Mingyu Zhang,¹ Junjie Hao,² Qiong Gu,¹ Haiyang Liu,³ Wei Chen,¹ Yafei Shi,¹ Bin Dong,¹ Yuanyuan Zhang,¹ Chunyu Li,¹ and Guohui Li¹

¹National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
²School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
³Tonghua Institute for Food and Drug Control, Tonghua, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Chunyu Li; chunyu_li@126.com and Guohui Li; tcm_sci@126.com

Received 11 June 2019; Revised 24 July 2019; Accepted 20 August 2019; Published 22 September 2019

Academic Editor: Wen-yi Kang

Copyright © 2019 Xiaowei Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Nowadays, an increasing number of patients are seriously affected by lung cancer. Si Jun Zi Tang (SJZ), a four-herb Chinese medicine formula first described approximately one thousand years ago, is often prescribed for cancer patients as a complementary therapy. But the research on the effective materials for treating cancer using SJZ was rarely reported. To solve this problem, we evaluate the inhibitory effect of 10 samples of SJZ from different origins on PC9 cells. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) along with canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and bioactivity validation were used to investigate the underlying correlation between the chemical ingredients and the antiproliferative effect of SJZ on PC9 cells. The evaluation indicated that 10 batches of SJZ could inhibit proliferation of PC9 cells and there was a notable difference in pharmacological activity between the different SJZ samples. The results of CCA and multivariate statistical analysis indicated that ginsenoside Ro and ginsenoside Rg1 might be active constituents of the antiproliferative effect as determined by spectrum-effect relationships. The results showed that bioassay and spectrum-effect relationships are suitable to associate sample quality with the active ingredient associated with clinical efficacy. And our finding would provide foundation and further understanding of the quality evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine decoction.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. 1.8 million people are diagnosed with lung cancer, and 1.6 million people die from this disease every year [1, 2]. Malignant proliferation of tumor cells is one of the leading causes of death. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) have been used to treat a variety of tumor with the obvious advantages of fewer side effects [3, 4]. Si Jun Zi Tang (SJZ) was first described in the “Prescriptions People’s Welfare Pharmacy” about a thousand years ago and consisted of Panax ginseng C.A.Mey., Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz., Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf., and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. at a proportion of 3 : 3 : 3 : 2. As a representative formula for tonic TCM, SJZ has the effect of replenishing qi and strengthening spleen and is usually used to regulate gastrointestinal function, anti-inflammatory, and enhances immunity [5, 6]. Furthermore, it has been found that SJZ played a crucial role in preventing tumor recurrence and metastasis, improving quality of life, and prolonging the overall survival time, across a range of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and gastric cancer [7–11]. Our previous research has shown that SJZ significantly suppresses Lewis lung cancer (LLC) growth in LLC-bearing mice [12]. However, the chemical composition of SJZ against lung cancer remains unclear, and it is difficult to control the quality linked to the clinical effects.

UPLC fingerprint is a useful tool for identifying authenticity, assessing quality, and distinguishing the ingredients of TCMs [13]. The spectrum-effect relationship that determines the correlations between fingerprint and biological activity is a scientific method for elucidating the pharmacodynamic basis and establishing a method for controlling the quality of TCMs [14–17].

Here, we evaluated the effect of SJZ on PC9 cells by a spectral-effect relationship approach. The IC50 of SJZ on PC9 cells was determined by analyzing ten batches of SJZ from different geographic regions. UPLC was performed to generate fingerprints of SJZ. Furthermore, UPLC and correlation analysis statistical method were used in combination to elucidate the relationship between pharmacological activity and chemical properties of 10 SJZ samples for characterizing their spectrum-effect relationships.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals, Reagents, and Materials

A total of 10 batches of SJZ comprising of Panax ginseng C.A.Mey. (R), Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. (B), Poria cocos (Schw.) Wolf. (F), and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch. (G) were included in the present study. Ten batches of R were purchased from China Medico Technology Co. Ltd. in Tianjin and designated as RS1–RS10. Ten batches of B, F, and G were obtained from various Chinese herbal medicine markets in several provinces of China, such as Heilongjiang, Jilin, Hunan, Shenyang, Guangxi, Beijing, and Sichuan. All the species were identified by Professor Xiao-he Xiao, a taxonomist at the China Military Institute of Chinese Medicine.

Phosphoric acid of HPLC grade was purchased from Beijing Chemical Works (Beijing, China). Acetonitrile of HPLC grade was bought from Fisher Scientific Co. (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Ultrapure distilled water was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q-Plus system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) [18]. The ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Ro, and Rd, liquiritin, ammonium glycyrrhetate, and atractylenolide III were acquired from Chengdu Chroma-Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Chengdu, China).

CCK-8 kit was purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). DMEM high-sugar medium, fetal bovine serum, penicillin, and streptomycin were obtained from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

PC9 cell line was purchased from the Fenghui Biotechnologies Inc. (Hunan, China), and it was authenticated by Hunan TSINGKE Biological Technology Co. Ltd.

2.2. Instruments

Waters Acquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) consisted of a photodiode array (PDA) detector, column compartment, autosampler manager, and a binary solvent delivery pump and was connected to Waters Empower 2 software [18]. Enzyme microplate reader was purchased from BioTek, Winooski, 126 VT, USA.

2.3. Plant Sample Preparation

The plant material of R, B, F, and G was ground into powder using a mill. 2.2 g SJZ powder consisted of R, B, F, and G powder (ratio 3 : 3 : 3 : 2) and were dissolved in 20 mL distilled water. The mixture was vortexed and heated to boil and kept faint boiling for 1 h. The sample was cooled, centrifuged for ten minutes at 3000 rpm, and then concentrated by a rotary evaporator.

2.4. Preparation of Reference Standard Solution

Standard solutions were prepared by adding accurately weighed amounts of ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Ro, and Rd, liquiritin, ammonium glycyrrhetate, and atractylenolide III dissolving with methanol to produce stock solution and stored at 4°C. Stock solutions of all the standards were diluted to the required concentrations and then mixed immediately before analyses. The final concentrations were 84.2 μg/mL (Rg1), 96.8 μg/mL (Re), 105.0 μg/mL (Rb1), 86.4 μg/mL (Rc), 95.0 μg/mL (Ro), 210.0 μg/mL (Rd), 372.0 μg/mL (liquiritin), 398.0 μg/mL (glycyrrhetate), and 30.8 μg/mL (atractylenolide III), respectively.

2.5. UPLC Conditions

All the solutions were filtered through the 0.22 μm microporous membrane before they were injected into the UPLC system. The chromatographic separation was performed using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C₁₈ column (2.1 mm × 100 mm i.d., 1.7 μm particle size) (Water, Milford, MA, USA), operated at 30°C. The mobile phase was a mixture of solvent A (acetonitrile) and solvent B (0.1% formic acid in water). Gradient elution was developed under the following conditions: 0–10 min, 10–19% A; 10–16 min, 19%–21% A; 16–21 min, 21–32% A; 21–26 min, 32%–41% A; 26–30 min, 41–45% A; 30–35 min, 45–48% A; 35–36 min, 48–53% A; 36–40 min, 53–60% A; 40–45 min, 60–70% A; 45–55 min, 70–90% A; 55–60 min, 90–100% A; and 60–62 min, 100–10% A. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.25 mL·min⁻¹. The effluent was monitored at 203 nm, and the sample injection volume was 5.0 μL.

2.6. Cell and Cell Culture

PC9 cells were cultured in the DMEM high-sugar medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 μg/mL) at 37°C under a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.

2.7. Cells Viability Assay

All ten water extracts of SJZ were dissolved in the 1 mL DMEM high-sugar medium. After incubation under 5% CO₂ at 37°C for 24 h, PC9 cells (10⁴ cells per well) were subsequently inoculated onto 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h before onset of treatment. Then, the supernatant was discarded, and cells were treated with SJZ samples over a broad dose range to establish growth curves for 48 h. After that, cells were incubated for an additional 1 h with the CCK-8 reagent (100 μL/mL medium). The absorbance was determined at 450 nm wavelength. The experiments were performed in triplicate. The proliferative inhibition rate was measured using the following formula:

The IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) value was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using Graph-Pad Prism software (San Diego, CA, USA).

2.8. HCA

HCA is a multivariate analysis method that sorts specimens into clusters. This analysis can divide objects into specific clusters by means of maximizing homogeneity within each cluster while also maximizing heterogeneity between cluster [19, 20]. In this study, HCA was used to assess correlations in the UPLC fingerprints of 10 SJZ samples and was performed with Metabo Analyst 3.0 (http://www.metaboanalyst.ca/).

2.9. CCA

CCA is to study the correlation between two continuous variables, extracting the main principal components of them and finding their linear combinations of two sets of variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is used to quantify the degree of colocalization between paired data. In our study, CCA was used to analyze the relevance between the peak area values from the UPLC fingerprints and IC50 from the measurement of inhibition on PC9 cells using SPSS statistics software (SPSS for Windows 17.0, SPSS Inc., USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of SJZ on PC9 Cell Viability

CCK-8 assays were performed to investigate the effects of SJZ on the proliferation of PC9 cells. After treatment for 48 h with different concentrations, all ten batches of SJZ exhibited growth-inhibitory effects against PC9 cells which was dose-dependent (Figures 1(a)–1(j)). Values of IC50, the concentration of the extract required to inhibit cell growth by 50% of the control level, were estimated from the corresponding concentration and growth-inhibition plot. The bioactivities of samples showed various IC50 values for PC9 cells, from 0.48 to 35.95 mg/mL (Figure 1(k)). It seemed that the growth-inhibitory effect of the SJZ1 was strongest as it had the lowest IC50.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

(k)

Figure 1: Inhibitory effects of ten batches of SJZ on PC9 cells. SJZ1-10 (a–j); IC50 of SJZ1-10 on PC9 cells (k).

3.2. Analysis of UPLC Fingerprints

Ten SJZ samples were analyzed by UPLC–UV. The fingerprints of their UV chromatograms are shown in Figure 2. Under optimized conditions, chromatograms were generated for all batches of SJZ (Figure 2(c)) as well as for a mixture of reference substances (Figure 2(a)) and a test sample of SJZ4 (Figure 2(b)). The professional similarities were calculated using the Similarity Evaluation System for Chromatographic Fingerprint of Herbal Medicines (Version 2012.130723). Similarities between the reference fingerprint and each chromatographic profile of the ten batches of SJZ samples were evaluated by calculating the correlation coefficient. There were similar chemical profiles across different batches, and nine common peaks were found between 1 and 30 min time intervals by comparing ultraviolet spectra and UPLC retention times for the ten chromatograms. By comparing with the fingerprints of the reference substances, nine common peaks (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h and i) were identified as liquiritin, ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Ro, and Rd, ammonium glycyrrhetate, and atractylenolide III. And the highest peak in the fingerprints was peak a. As shown in Table 1, some differences were noted among data collected for the common peaks, such that the coefficients of variance (RSD%) for all common peaks were larger than 34.92%, which indicated that the content of chemical constituents was variant in different batches of SJZ from different origins.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: UPLC chromatogram of reference substances (a), test samples (b), and ten batches of SJZ (c). Nine peaks were identified by comparison with standard substances: (a) liquiritin; (b) ginsenoside Rg1, (c) Re, (d) Rb1, (e) Rc, (f) Ro, and (g) Rd; (h) ammonium glycyrrhetate; (i) atractylenolide III.

Table 1: The relative peak area of nine common peaks measured by UPLC.

Sample
Peak area of each compound

a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i

S1
71
2499
548
344
606
839
480
2971
358

S2
683
1421
623
1306
1189
1124
384
3568
391

S3
25039
1769
741
2129
819
664
764
2523
293

S4
11207
809
818
602
792
682
591
2100
604

S5
20198
964
729
818
705
899
757
3657
508

S6
11626
772
638
531
569
507
535
1285
135

S7
30946
740
2396
1085
938
1821
622
2638
239

S8
12341
723
544
391
403
489
666
1262
361

S9
12421
1161
1597
1234
1363
1256
1457
3885
293

S10
13951
577
576
1281
612
392
516
2465
209

RSD%
69.65
52.53
65.53
56.45
36.79
50.13
44.11
34.92
41

RSD = σ/μ  100; RSD is the relative standard deviation; σ is the standard deviation; μ is the average value of peak area.

3.3. Results of Hierarchical Clustering Analysis

A heat map is a graphical representation of data where each colored cell corresponds to an individual value contained in a matrix. Adjacent by HCA, the nine common peaks across ten SJZ samples were visualized by a heat map, and two clusters could be detected from Figure 3. Cluster 1 was composed of S1-S2, and cluster 2 consisted of S3–S10. In the heat map, the deeper color indicates the peak area of the SJZ samples of higher intensity. The results suggested that the content of chemical constituents contained in samples in cluster 1 was higher than that in cluster 2. The differences in the chemical ingredients could be related to the different geographic locations. The results showed that the SJZ samples from different origins had similar chemical fingerprint, and HCA could initially separate the samples at the chemical level.

Figure 3: HCA heat map for ten SJZ samples and nine chemical compounds (right of the map).

3.4. Analysis of the Spectrum-Effect Relationship

CCA was used to study the spectrum-effect relationships between IC50 and area values of nine common peaks. As shown in Figure 4, the correlation coefficients demonstrated that eight peaks, namely, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i, were negatively correlated, while peak a was positively correlated. The value of IC50 which refers to the concentration to inhibit cell growth by 50% of the control level was negatively correlated with antitumor bioactivity of the SJZ sample. The results suggested that these compounds could inhibit the proliferation of PC9 cells. Eight correlated peaks, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, and i, have been identified previously as ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Ro, and Rd, ammonium glycyrrhetate, and atractylenolide III, respectively. Ginsenoside Ro was the most correlated (R = −0.862) to the biological effect, and the bioactivity of ginsenoside Rg1 was the second highest (R = −0.576). Therefore, the above results indicate that ginsenoside Ro and ginsenoside Rg1 are the major antiproliferative constituents.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Analysis of the spectrum-effect relationship: (a) the correlation coefficient between the content of chemical compounds and bioactivity; (b) thermograph of the correlation analysis of all factors. (1) Ginsenoside Re; (2) ginsenoside Ro; (3) ginsenoside Rg1; (4) atractylenolide III; (5) ginsenoside Rc; (6) ginsenoside Rd; (7) ginsenoside Rb1; (8) ammonium glycyrrhetate; (9) liquiritin; (10) IC50. < 0.01.

3.5. Experimental Validation

Eight correlated peaks, ginsenoside Rg1, Re, Rb1, Rc, Ro, and Rd, ammonium glycyrrhetate, and atractylenolide III, were positively correlated with inhibition activity of PC9 cells. To validate the antiproliferation effect of eight constituents, the inhibition on PC9 cells of the eight compounds was determined at the same concentration. As shown in Figure 5, all samples could inhibit the proliferation of PC9 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and the inhibitory effect by ginsenoside Ro was highest than others, and ginsenoside Rg1 was the second highest, which is in accordance with the abovementioned results.

Figure 5: Dose-response curves of eight constituents inhibiting PC9 cell proliferation. (1) Ginsenoside Re; (2) ginsenoside Ro; (3) ginsenoside Rg1; (4) atractylenolide III; (5) ginsenoside Rc; (6) ginsenoside Rd; (7) ginsenoside Rb1; (8) ammonium glycyrrhetate.

4. Discussion

TCM decoction is an oral liquid preparation prepared by decocting several Chinese herbal medicines according to the theory of “Jun-Chen-Zuo-Shi” and appropriate dosage ratio. It has the characteristics of good absorption, quick onset, and flexible composition, which fully embodies the essence of syndrome differentiation and treatment of TCM [21, 22]. Therefore, it is especially important to control the quality of TCM decoction because it directly affects clinical efficacy. However, due to the multitarget and multicomponent characteristics of TCM decoction, it is difficult to control the quality of TCM decoction and it has become a hot topic in the field of decoction research. Recently, many studies have proved that the spectral-effect relationship should be an effective method to control the quality of TCMs because it can connect chromatographic fingerprints with biological activity to explore quality markers related to clinical efficacy [23]. So, to ensure the quality and therapeutic consistency of TCM decoction, this approach may be a promising strategy to control its quality. The experimental results presented here indicate that ginsenoside Ro and ginsenoside Rg1 may be the main active components for inhibiting the proliferation of PC9 cells.

Consistent with this work, it has been reported that ginsenosides Ro and Rg1 could inhibit various types of cancer cells. Ginsenosides Ro could suppress autophagy by inhibiting autophagosome-lysosome fusion to sensitize esophageal cancer cells to 5-Fu-induced cell death [24] and inhibit the metastatic dissemination of colon cancer cells HT29 by suppressing the expression of p-ERK1/2 in HT29 cells [25]. Additionally, ginsenosides Ro is one of the bioactive constituents of ShenMai, which is an adjuvant therapy for cancer by inhibiting human organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATP)1B [26]. Meanwhile, ginsenosides Rg1 could exert cytotoxic activity against human lung cancer cell lines A549, H1264, H1299, and Calu-6 [27] and suppress thyroid cancer proliferation and migration by enhancing the expression of Cx31 [28]. Moreover, ginsenosides Rg1 could sensitize hepatoblastoma cells to DNA-damaging agent, making ginsenosides Rg1 a promising chemotherapeutic agent [29], and it is also expected to become a preventive vaccine adjuvant for lymphoma by activating dendritic cells [30]. Thus, ginsenosides Rg1 and ginsenosides Ro may be used as new markers for quality control of SJZ treating lung cancer in the future.

Our findings suggested that spectrum-effect relationship should be a useful tool to associate the “quality marker” with clinical efficacy of TCM decoction, and it also provided a paradigm for the quality control of other anticancer TCM decoction. However, the two compounds cannot be applied as indicators of the overall quality control of SJZ because antiproliferative effect on PC9 cells is only one of its various clinical effects. Moreover, we mainly focused on compounds with a strong UV signal due to instrument limitations (PDA detector). Ginsenoside Rg3 played an important role in the prevention and treatment of cancer, but due to its low content, it could not be detected in this research [31, 32]. Therefore, further research is needed to determine whether ginsenosides Ro and Rg1 can be used as quality control markers for treating other diseases and whether there are other potential active components against lung cancer in SJZ. Next, to explore more active constituents or metabolites, mass spectrometry analysis will be considered for this research.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (grant no. 2016-I2M-1-001).

References

M. Ostrowski, T. Marjański, and W. Rzyman, “Low-dose computed tomography screening reduces lung cancer mortality,” Advances in Medical Sciences, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 230–236, 2018.

M. Rabbani, J. Kanevsky, K. Kafi, F. Chandelier, and F. J. Giles, “Role of artificial intelligence in the care of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 48, no. 4, Article ID e12901, 2018.

Y.-H. Liao, C.-I. Li, C.-C. Lin, J.-G. Lin, J.-H. Chiang, and T.-C. Li, “Traditional Chinese medicine as adjunctive therapy improves the long-term survival of lung cancer patients,” Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, vol. 143, no. 12, pp. 2425–2435, 2017.

J.-S. Lou, P. Yao, and K. W. K. Tsim, “Cancer treatment by using traditional Chinese medicine: probing active compounds in anti-multidrug resistance during drug therapy,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 38, pp. 5128–5141, 2019.

J. Sun, L. Zhang, Y. He et al., “To unveil the molecular mechanisms of Qi and blood through systems biology-based investigation into Si-Jun-Zi-Tang and Si-Wu-Tang formulae,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID 34328, 2016.

H. Jin, C. Cai, B. Li et al., “Modified Si-Jun-Zi-Tang attenuates airway inflammation in a murine model of chronic asthma by inhibiting teff cells via the mTORC1 pathway,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 10, no. 161, pp. 1–11, 2019.

Z. Guan, J. Wu, C. Wang et al., “Investigation of the preventive effect of Sijunzi decoction on mitomycin C-induced immunotoxicity in rats by ¹H NMR and MS-based untargeted metabolomic analysis,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 210, pp. 179–191, 2018.

H. Xiao and J. Yang, “Immune enhancing effect of modified sijunzi decoction on patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy,” Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 164–167, 2011.

J. Y. Zhou, M. Chen, C. E. Wu, Y. W. Zhuang, Y. G. Chen, and S. L. Liu, “The modified Si-Jun-Zi decoction attenuates colon cancer liver metastasis by increasing macrophage cells,” BMC Complementary & Alternative Medicine, vol. 19, no. 86, pp. 1–8, 2019.

L. Chen, T. Jin, C. Ning, S. Wang, L. Wang, and J. Lin, “Anti-tumor and immune-modulating effect of Jiawei Sijunzi decoction in mice bearing hepatoma H22 tumor,” Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2019.

J. Li, J. Qian, J. G. Jia et al., “Effect of Sijunzi decoction on the proliferation of side population cells of human gastric cancer cell line,” Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 704–709, 2014.

C. Li, M. Niu, R. Wang et al., “The modulatory properties of Si Jun Zi Tang enhancing anticancer of gefitinib by an integrating approach,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 111, pp. 1132–1140, 2019.

Z. Shi, Z. Liu, C. Liu et al., “Spectrum-effect relationships between chemical fingerprints and antibacterial effects of lonicerae japonicae flos and lonicerae flos base on UPLC and microcalorimetry,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1–8, 2016.

M. Shi, Y. Zhang, M. Song, Y. Sun, C. Li, and W. Kang, “Screening the marker components in Psoralea corylifolia L. with the aids of spectrum-effect relationship and component knock-out by UPLC-MS²,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1–18, 2018.

J. Wang, L. Peng, M. Shi, C. Li, Y. Zhang, and W. Kang, “Spectrum effect relationship and component knock-out in Angelica Dahurica radix by high performance liquid chromatography-Q exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 7, p. 1231, 2017.

C. Q. Li, C. Yao, R. Y. Zhu, Y. X. Huang, W. Y. Kang, and J. M. Wang, “Spectrum-effect relationship in antioxidant activity of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus based on DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1670–1677, 2016.

J. m. Wang, C. Yao, C.-c. Lu, C.-q. Li, and W.-y. Kang, “Spectrum-effect relationship of antioxidant activity of wine fried ligustrum lucidum fructus,” Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 51, no. 22, pp. 1907–1912, 2016.

C. Li, C. Tu, Y. Che et al., “Bioassay based screening for the antiplatelet aggregation quality markers of Polygonum multiflorum with UPLC and chemometrics,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 166, pp. 264–272, 2019.

H.-z. Huang, S.-y. Zhao, X.-m. Ke et al., “Study on the stability control strategy of Triphala solution based on the balance of physical stability and chemical stabilities,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 158, pp. 247–256, 2018.

X. Han, H. Jiang, L. Han et al., “A novel quantified bitterness evaluation model for traditional Chinese herbs based on an animal ethology principle,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 209–217, 2018.

H. Luo, Q. Li, A. Flower, G. Lewith, and J. Liu, “Comparison of effectiveness and safety between granules and decoction of Chinese herbal medicine: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 555–567, 2012.

W. Feng, H. Ao, C. Peng, and D. Yan, “Gut microbiota, a new frontier to understand traditional Chinese medicines,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 142, pp. 176–191, 2019.

X. Wu, H. Zhang, S. Fan et al., “Quality markers based on biological activity: a new strategy for the quality control of traditional Chinese medicine,” Phytomedicine, vol. 44, pp. 103–108, 2018.

K. Zheng, Y. Li, S. Wang et al., “Inhibition of autophagosome-lysosome fusion by ginsenoside Ro via the ESR2-NCF1-ROS pathway sensitizes esophageal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil-induced cell death via the CHEK1-mediated DNA damage checkpoint,” Autophagy, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1593–1613, 2016.

Z. Jiang, J. Qian, H. Dong et al., “The traditional Chinese medicine Achyranthes bidentata and our de novo conception of its metastatic chemoprevention: from phytochemistry to pharmacology,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017.

O. E. Olaleye, W. Niu, F.-f. Du et al., “Multiple circulating saponins from intravenous ShenMai inhibit OATP1Bs in vitro: potential joint precipitants of drug interactions,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 833–849, 2019.

J. S. Yu, H.-S. Roh, K.-H. Baek et al., “Bioactivity-guided isolation of ginsenosides from Korean Red Ginseng with cytotoxic activity against human lung adenocarcinoma cells,” Journal of Ginseng Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 562–570, 2018.

L. Xu, S.-W. Chen, X.-Y. Qi, X.-X. Li, and Y.-B. Sun, “Ginsenoside improves papillary thyroid cancer cell malignancies partially through upregulating connexin 31,” The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 313–320, 2018.

N. Zhen, L. Jin, J. Ma et al., “Ginsenoside Rg1 impairs homologous recombination repair by targeting CtBP-interacting protein and sensitizes hepatoblastoma cells to DNA damage,” Anti-Cancer Drugs, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 756–766, 2018.

Y. Huang, Y. Zou, L. Lin, and R. Zheng, “Ginsenoside Rg1 activates dendritic cells and acts as a vaccine adjuvant inducing protective cellular responses against lymphomas,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1168–1177, 2017.

M. Sun, Y. Ye, L. Xiao, X. Duan, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhang, “Anticancer effects of ginsenoside Rg3 (review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 507–518, 2017.

H. Y. Sun, J. H. Lee, Y.-S. Han et al., “Pivotal roles of ginsenoside Rg3 in tumor apoptosis through regulation of reactive oxygen species,” Anticancer Research, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 4647–4654, 2016.