Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and GynecologyVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 727248, 4 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/727248

Research Article

In Vitro Anti-Candida Activity of Lidocaine and Nitroglycerin: Alone and Combined

Ana Palmeira-de-Oliveira,¹ Ana Rita Ramos,¹ Carlos Gaspar,¹ Rita Palmeira-de-Oliveira,¹ Paula Gouveia,1,2 and José Martinez-de-Oliveira1,3

¹Health Sciences Research Center (CICS), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, Covilhã, Portugal²Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Hospital Center Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal³Women and Child Health Department, Hospital Center Cova da Beira, Covilhã, Portugal

Received 9 February 2012; Accepted 19 March 2012

Academic Editor: Secondo Guaschino

Copyright © 2012 Ana Palmeira-de-Oliveira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The aim of this work was to study the anti-Candida activity of lidocaine and nitroglycerin alone and in combination. Ten Candida strains were included, corresponding to 1 collection type strain (ATCC 10231) and 9 clinical isolates: 4 C. albicans, 2 C. glabrata, 1 C. tropicalis, 1 C. krusei, and 1 C. parapsilosis. The CLSI reference M27-A3 micromethod was used to determine the anti-Candida activity of the drugs alone; minimal inhibitory and lethal concentrations were determined. The classic checkboard technique was used to determine the activity of combined drugs. Lidocaine fungicidal effect was dosedependent. Nitroglycerin exhibited a higher effect. The drugs combination resulted in a reduction of the inhibitory concentration, corresponding to an additive effect. In conclusion, both drugs exhibited an interesting anti-Candida activity. The combination of lidocaine with nitroglycerin was shown to have an additive effect against Candida spp., predicting the interest to include, in the future, these drugs in a new delivery system for the treatment of mucocutaneous candidosis.

1. Introduction

Candida spp. are microorganisms frequently found in the human oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and vagina [1–4]. Among mucocutaneous infections, vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) is the second most frequent vaginal infection, after vaginal bacteriosis and is one of the most common clinical diseases caused by Candida spp. It affects 70–75% of women at least once in their lifetime while 40–50% of them will experience a recurrence; 5–8% of adult women develop recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC), defined as four or more episodes within a year [3–7]. The main goal of VVC treatment is the control and immediate relief of its signs and symptoms, related to vulvovaginal inflammation, as quickly as possible and the mycological cure to be confirmed some days later; recurrence prevention is also pursued [8]. VVC is usually treated very effectively with azoles, which are present in the most prescribed therapeutic regimens, unless a suspected or confirmed azole-resistant Candida strain is involved. On the other hand, most gynecologists believe that the control of RVVC requires both systemic and local therapy, also involving new antifungal drugs and strategies [3, 9, 10]. Despite RVVC being considered a Candida infection that is more dependent on the host characteristics, therapeutics approaches available and able to allow a remission of the symptoms between episodes are antifungal drugs used for a long period of time [8, 9, 11]. Some authors consider that new therapeutic strategies must be considered for RVVC control [3, 9, 10]. In addition to the limited number of available antifungal drugs, the restrictions to its use stress the need for the development and validation of new therapeutic strategies exhibiting distinct mechanisms of action and/or evasion of resistance [12–15].

Lidocaine is used as anesthetic, and its anti-Candida activity has been previously reported as a fungicidal drug exhibiting a dose-dependent effect and related with a primary lesion of the cytoplasmic membrane [12]. Also its ability to inhibit Candida albicans germ tube formation was reported [16]. Nitroglycerin has been used to treat haemorrhoidal symptoms under an ointment pharmaceutical formulation, commercially available as Rectogesic [17]. An association of lidocaine with isosorbide-di-nitrate has also been proposed for the treatment of anorectal problems [18] on behalf of the expected benefits of combining their individual properties, namely, anaesthetic and blood supply promoter.

As in VVC, irritation leads to excoriations and fissuring [19]. We investigated the in vitro anti-Candida activity of lidocaine and nitroglycerin, both alone and in combination, in view of its possible future inclusion in a pharmaceutical formulation for the treatment of mucocutaneous candidosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Drugs

Pure and analytic grade compounds were used to prepare the tested solutions used in this work. A 6% lidocaine solution was prepared by solubilization of lidocaine cloridrate (Sigma-Aldrich, Portugal) in sterile water. Stock solution of 1% glycerol trinitrate (Merck, Germany) was used to prepare the work solution, meaning 0.5% nitroglycerin in RPMI 1640 culture medium (Biochrom AG, Berlin). Serial concentrations of the products were obtained by geometric dilution in RPMI.

2.2. Yeast Strains

A total of 10 Candida strains were used, including 5 C. albicans, 2 C. glabrata, 1 C. tropicalis, 1 C. krusei,and 1 C. parapsilosis. With exception of the type strains C. albicans ATCC 10231 from the American Type Culture Collection, all the other strains tested were isolates from patients with RVVC and showed variable degree of resistance to fluconazole (Table 1). Such isolates had been characterized to species level using API ID 32 (BioMérieux, Vercieux, France), and its susceptibility pattern to classic antifungals (fluconazole and amphotericin B) was determined according to the CLSI M27-A3 micromethod. The strains were kept frozen in Brain-Heart Broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) with 5% glycerol at −70°C until testing. After thawing, the strains were subcultured twice on Sabouraud agar (Difco) to assure optimal growth (37°C/24 h).

Table 1: Candida spp. origin and susceptible profile to classic antifungals, namely, fluconazole and amphotericin B. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICS) are presented in μg/mL.

Species
Origin
Fluconazol MIC (μg/mL)
Amphotericin B MIC (μg/mL)

C. albicans ATCC 10231
Collection
1
0.5

C. albicans AP440
Vaginal
0.25
0.25

C. albicans AP416
Vaginal
<0.125
1

C. albicans AP437
Vaginal
2
0.5

C. albicans AP439
Vaginal
0.5
1

C. glabrata AP426
Vaginal
32
0.25

C. glabrata AP425
Vaginal
32
0.25

C. krusei AP3
Vaginal
>64
0.5

C. tropicalis AP407
Vaginal
2
1

C. parapsilosis AP11
Vaginal
1
0.5

2.3. Anti-Candida Activity

The lidocaine and nitroglycerin anti-Candida activity was assessed according to the CLSI reference M27-A3 micromethod protocol [20]. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were read visually after 48 h of incubation at 37°C. For each tested concentration, yeast growth was compared with the positive control (growth control). Only the total growth inhibition was considered as MIC. All determinations were performed in duplicate, and only concordant results from three independent experiments were considered.

The modified protocol proposed by Canton et al. [21] was used to determine minimal lethal concentrations (MLCS).

2.4. Anti-Candida Activity of Lidocaine Plus Nitroglycerin

The classical checkerboard methodology, as described by Vitale et al. [22], was used to determine the MIC resulting from the products association. One C. albicans ATCC 10231 was included. Briefly, a two-dimensional microplate with 50 μl of each product was prepared; microplates were incubated during 24 h at 37 °C.

MIC for products association was calculated from three independent experiences with concordant results. To evaluate the compound interactions, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was calculated as follows: (MIC of Drug A in combination/MIC of Drug A alone) + (MIC of Drug B in combination/MIC of Drug B alone). The interpretation of the FICI corresponds to a synergic effect for values ≤0.5: additive effect when >0.5 but <4.0 and antagonism when ≥4.0 [22].

3. Results and Discussion

Lidocaine and nitroglycerin exhibited antifungal activity upon Candida spp. MIC varied from 10 mg/mL to 30 mg/mL for lidocaine and from 0.15 mg/mL to 0.30 mg/mL for nitroglycerin (Table 2). The antifungal susceptibility pattern of the selected strains to classical antifungals, namely, fluconazole and amphotericin B, was unrelated to the tested compounds activity, predicting distinct mechanisms of action.

Table 2: Candida spp. susceptibility to nitroglycerin and lidocaine. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal lethal concentration (MLC) are presented in mg/mL.

Species
Nitroglycerin
Lidocaine

MIC
MLC
MIC
MLC

C. albicans ATCC 10231
0.15
0.15
10.0
15.0

C. albicans MC440
0.15
0.15
15.0
20.0

C. albicans MC416
0.15
0.15
15.0
20.0

C. albicans MC437
0.15
0.15
15.0
20.0

C. albicans MC439
0.15
0.15
15.0
20.0

C. glabrata MC426
0.30
0.30
20.0
30.0

C. glabrata MC425
0.30
0.625
20.0
30.0

C. krusei OL103
0.30
1.25
10.0
20.0

C. tropicalis MC407
0.30
0.30
20.0
30.0

C. parapsilosis AP11
0.30
0.30
15.0
25.0

Lidocaine fungicidal effect was confirmed for concentrations corresponding to at least double MIC, varying from 15 mg/mL to 30 mg/ml, showing a dose-dependent effect. C. krusei and C. albicans ATCC10231 were the most susceptible strains to lidocaine (MIC 10 mg/mL). Other C. albicans exhibited an increased MIC, 15 mg/mL, similar to C. parapsilosis. On the other hand, C. glabrata and C. tropicalis were the less susceptible, having their growth inhibited by lidocaine at 20 mg/mL. Our results are in accordance with other authors that confirm the higher C. albicans susceptibility to this drug [12]. However, some MIC and MLC differences were noticed (onefold dilution). This is probably related to the fact that those authors choose the macromethod from the same protocol that we used for the micromethod.

Regarding nitroglycerin, the effect was fungicidal at concentrations able to inhibit Candida growth, being MIC and MLC coincident. C. albicans was the most susceptible species tested (0.15 mg/mL). Other species exhibited higher MIC values (0.30 mg/mL), coincident with MLC for C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata AP 426: lower to MLC for C. glabrata AP 425 (0.6 mg/mL) and C. krusei (1.25 mg/ml).

The possible antifungal advantage of the two products association was studied by the checkerboard procedure upon C. albicans. A reduction effect was evident for both MIC products (lidocaine alone—7,5 mg/mL, lidocaine in combination—5 mg/mL; nitroglycerin alone—0,15 mg/mL, nitroglycerin in combination—0,075 mg/mL) expressed by the resulting FICI value (1.17) that corresponds to an additive effect (>0.5 and <4.0).

The possible pH variation with the addition of both solutions to culture medium was limited by the tampon effect of the RPMI medium. Additionally, the pH value at the drugs most concentrated conditions was measured and confirmed to be between 6.9 and 7.1, guarantying no pH influence on the results.

4. Conclusions

In this study we tested the anti-Candida activity of lidocaine and nitroglycerin alone and in combination in view of their use as topical treatment of acute VVC. Nitroglycerin’s vasodilator effect may promote healing while at the same time the anesthetic effect of lidocaine may relief pain, burning, and pruritus. Our results show that adding to the well-known therapeutic effects of these two individual drugs an anti-Candida activity may also be relevant. The combination of lidocaine with nitroglycerin showed to have an additive effect against Candida spp.

In the future, the development of a new delivery system including both lidocaine and nitroglycerin at concentrations higher than MIC values here reported and that allow compounds to produce local effect limiting possible systemic absorption, stands up as an interesting approach for VVC topical treatment. These in vitro studies showing their significant antifungal activity must now be followed by in vivo studies in animal models, to evidence the efficacy of this cheap and believed to be safe new strategy.

References

J. M. de Oliveira, A. S. Cruz, A. F. Fonseca et al., “Prevalence of Candida albicans in vaginal fluid of asymptomatic Portuguese women,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 41–42, 1993.

P. A. Mårdh, N. Novikova, and E. Stukalova, “Colonisation of extragenital sites by Candida in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candiosis,” International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 934–937, 2003.

P. A. Mårdh, A. G. Rodrigues, M. Genç, N. Novikova, J. Martinez-De-Oliveira, and S. Guaschino, “Facts and myths on recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis—a review on epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy,” International Journal of STD and AIDS, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 522–539, 2002.

J. D. Sobel, “Vulvovaginal candidosis,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9577, pp. 1961–1971, 2007.

R. Hurley and J. De Louvois, “Candida vaginitis,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 55, no. 647, pp. 645–647, 1979.

B. Foxman, J. V. Marsh, B. Gillespie, and J. D. Sobel, “Frequency and response to vaginal symptoms among white and African American women: results of a random digit dialing survey,” Journal of Women's Health, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1167–1174, 1998.

J. Ferrer, “Vaginal candidosis: epidemiological and etiological factors,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 71, supplement 1, pp. S21–S27, 2000.

W. Mendling and C. Seebacher, “Guideline for vulvovaginal candidiasis. 6 November 2002 status. Professional Society of Infections and Infection Immunology of the German Society of gynecology and obstetrics and German Language Mycologic Society e.V,” Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 149–152, 2004.

G. G. Donders, G. Bellen, and W. Mendling, “Management of recurrent vulvo-vaginal candidosis as a chronic illness,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 306–321, 2010.

D. Ray, R. Goswami, U. Banerjee et al., “Prevalence of Candida glabrata and its response to boric acid vaginal suppositories in comparison with oral fluconazole in patients with diabetes and vulvovaginal candidiasis,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 312–317, 2007.

J. D. Sobel, P. S. Kapernick, M. Zervos et al., “Treatment of complicated Candida vaginitis: comparison of single and sequential doses of fluconazole,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 363–369, 2001.

C. Pina-Vaz, A. G. Rodrigues, F. Sansonetty, J. Martinez-De-Oliveira, A. F. Fonseca, and P. A. Mardh, “Antifungal activity of local anesthetics against Candida species,” Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 124–137, 2000.

A. Pauli, “Anticandidal low molecular compounds from higher plants with special reference to compounds from essential oils,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 223–268, 2006.

A. Palmeira-de-Oliveira, M. P. Ribeiro, R. Palmeira-de-Oliveira, et al., “Anti-Candida activity of a chitosan hydrogel: mechanism of action and cytotoxicity profile,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 322–327, 2010.

V. M. Barodka, E. Acheampong, G. Powell et al., “Antimicrobial effects of liquid anesthetic isoflurane on Candida albicans,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 4, p. 46, 2006.

A. Rodrigues, C. Pina Vaz, A. F. Fonseca, J. M. de Oliveira, and H. Barros, “In vitro effect of local anesthetics on Candida albicans germ tube formation,” Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 193–197, 1994.

J. J. Tjandra, J. J. Y. Tan, J. F. Lim, C. Murray-Green, M. L. Kennedy, and D. Z. Lubowski, “Rectogesic (glyceryl trinitrate 0.2%) ointment relieves symptoms of haemorrhoids associated with high resting anal canal pressures,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 457–463, 2007.

M. Yakoot and M. A. Salaam, “Study of efficacy and safety of a new local cream ("healer") in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. A prospective, randomized, single-blind, comparative study,” Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 179–182, 2009.

F. C. Odds, Candidosis of the Genitalia. Candida and Candidosis. A Review and Bibliography, Bailliere Tindall, London, UK, 1988.

CLSI, “Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard-third edition,” CLSI document M27-A3, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pa, USA, 2008.

E. Canton, J. Peman, A. Viudes, G. Quindos, M. Gobernado, and A. Espinel-Ingroff, “Minimum fungicidal concentrations of amphotericin B for bloodstream Candida species,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 203–206, 2003.

S. C. Vitale, J. Afeltra, and E. Dannaoui, “Antifungal combinations,” in Antifungal Agents: Methods and Protocols, E. J. Ernst and P. D. Rogers, Eds., p. 118, Humana Press, Memphis, Tenn, USA, 2005.