International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4371064, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4371064

Research Article

Structural Study of Europium Doped Gadolinium Polyphosphates LiGd(PO₃)₄ and Its Effect on Their Spectroscopic, Thermal, Magnetic, and Optical Properties

Saoussen Hammami,¹ Nassira Chniba Boudjada,² and Adel Megriche¹

¹Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR11ES18 Unité de recherche de Chimie Minérale Appliquée. Campus Universitaire Farhat Hached, 2092 Manar 1. Tunis, Tunisia
²Institut Néel, BP 166, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

Correspondence should be addressed to Saoussen Hammami; sosanehammami@gmail.com

Received 13 December 2017; Accepted 29 March 2018; Published 19 June 2018

Academic Editor: Adil Denizli

Copyright © 2018 Saoussen Hammami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Alkali metal-rare earth polyphosphates (PO₃)₄ (LGP:Eu³⁺) (where x= 0, 0.02 and 0.04) were synthesized by solid-state reaction. The Rietveld refinement showed the following cell parameters: I 2/a space group, a=9.635 Å, b=7.035 Å, c=13.191 Å, β=90.082°, V= 894.214Å3, and Z=4. The similarity between =4.21% and =4.31% indicated that the realized refinement is reliable. The crystal structure consists of infinite zig-zag chains of tetrahedra, linked by bridging oxygen. The acyclic structure of polyphosphates is confirmed by infrared and Raman (IR) spectroscopies. A good thermal stability up to 940°C and paramagnetic behavior of these compounds were also proved by thermal analyses and magnetic susceptibility measurements, respectively. Excitation spectra revealed the charge transfer phenomenon between and Eu³⁺ (CTB), the energy transfer from Gd³⁺ to Eu³⁺, and the intrinsic 4f-4f transitions of Eu³⁺ where the electronic transitions were also identified. Moreover, LGP:Eu³⁺ can emit intense reddish orange light under excitation at 394 nm. The strongest tow at 578 and 601 nm can be attributed to the transitions from excited state ⁵D₀ to ground states ⁷F₁ and ⁷F₂, respectively.

1. Introduction

Condensed alkali metal-rare earth polyphosphates, with the general formula (PO₃)₄ (where = are alkali metal and = are rare earth ions), have been extensively investigated thanks to their structural diversity [1–4] and their interesting magnetic [5], optic [6], and electric [7] proprieties. These polyphosphates are generally stable in normal conditions of temperature and humidity [8], which makes them useful for industrial applications. For example, Yamada et al. have used the LiNd(PO₃)₄ polyphosphate as a solid-state laser material [9, 10]. However, Z. Mua et al. have used LiEu(PO₃)₄ compound for white light-emitting diodes [11]. They are also used as promising scintillation material such as the Ce³⁺ doped MGd(PO₃)₄ compound [12].

In order to enhance the optical properties of polyphosphates, researches were oriented to doping them with metal-rare earths. In recent years, a great interest was accorded to europium earth-rare due to its outstanding photoluminescence feature [13–19]. In fact, the presence of well-defined energy levels in europium allows the emission of monochromatic and coherent radiations in solid laser.

The Gd–Eu couple is well known for its efficient conversion of the absorbed high-energy photons into two visible ones [20–24]. This phenomenon may be followed by a sequence of two steps of energies transfer. The first step is the transition → of Gd³⁺, involving the ⁵D₀→⁷F₁ transition of the Eu³⁺ ion. The one red photon related to the    → transition is created. In the second step, the energy of Gd³⁺ is related to → ⁸S transition which is transported over the Gd³⁺ sublattice and then transferred to another Eu³⁺ ion. This phenomenon leads to emission (J = 0, 1, 2, or 3) [25].

This work describes the synthesis of (PO₃)₄ polyphosphate, doped with different low percentages of europium (2 and 4%). The structural study of all obtained compounds is carried out with XRD diffraction. The infrared and Raman spectroscopies and magnetic and thermal analyses were recorded at room temperature. Moreover, the optical study through excitation and emission of Eu³⁺ ions spectra was also undertaken.

2. Experimental

The condensed phosphates (PO₃)₄ (where x= 0, 0.02 and 0.04) were synthesized by solid-state reaction (methods of Hammami et al. 2017) [26]. A mixture of the reagents, Li₂CO₃, Gd₂O₃, Eu₂O₃, and NH₄H₂PO₄, was prepared with the molar ratio (2.1:1:8) of Li:Gd:P, respectively. First, the raw materials were grounding in an agate mortar for one hour at least to homogenize the solid phase and improve the interatomic diffusion. Second, the mixture was introduced into the oven and submitted to the following thermal program. The first level was at 430°C to eliminate H₂O, NH₃, and CO₂, the second one was at 730°C to get (PO₃)₄ pure phase. Then, the obtained products were cooled with the rate of 2°C/min to ensure a better crystallinity. Finally, the synthesized polyphosphates were washed with boiling water and nitric acid solution (1mol/L) to eliminate the residual raw materials from the final product.

The proposed chemical reaction for polyphosphate synthesis is

Samples were characterized using an INEL XRG 3000 (D5000T) diffractometer with monochromatic Cu radiation. The diffraction pattern was recorded under 300K over the angular range 10-90° (2). The luminescence spectra were performed under ambient atmosphere via Xenius (the fluorescence Genius) spectrophotometer, at 591nm and 394nm for excitation and emission, respectively. The infrared spectra were recorded in the range of 250–1500 cm with a Thermo Scientific Nicolet N10 MX using sample dispersed in KBr pellets. Raman analysis was carried out at room temperature, with 514.5 nm radiation from an argon ion laser as the excitation beam. A microscope allowed a selection of high optical quality regions in the crystalline sample. Thermal stability of Eu³⁺ doped LGP was measured with differential thermal analysis SETARAM TAG 16 operating from room temperature up to 1000°C with heating rate of 5°C min⁻¹. Magnetic measurements were carried out using Quantum Design MPMSXL magnetometer with detection SQUID (at institute NEEL France).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Rietveld Refinement Data Analyses

The Rietveld refinement of X-ray diffraction patterns of synthesized LiGd(PO₃)₄ samples is shown in Figure 1. The graph presents the experimental and the calculated data as well as the difference between them. As it is shown, the presence of only single phase was checked by Rietveld fitting quality through the reliability R factors: , , profile , and weighted profile , which should be less than 10%. The final R factors, atomic coordinates, site occupancy, thermal displacement parameters, and their estimated standard deviations in parentheses for LGP are shown in Table 1. Interatomic bond distances and angles are given in Table 2. The new lattice parameters, derived from the Rietveld refinement, are a=9.635 Å, b= 7.035 Å, c= 13.191 Å, and β= 90.082° and with monoclinic space group I 2/a.

Table 1: Refined structure parameters from powder X-ray Rietveld analysis for LiGd(PO₃)₄ in space group I 2/a.

Atom
Wyck
x
y
z
B
Occ

Gd
4e
0.75000
0.2982(3)
0.00000
1.35(8)
0.50

Li
4e
0.75000
0.79603(4)
0.00000
1.88(16)
0.50

P1
8f
0.48189(3)
0.06204(4)
0.143135(20)
1.88(16)
1.00

P2
8f
0.54601(3)
0.66399(4)
0.15354(2)
1.88(16)
1.00

OL12
8f
0.5665(6)
0.87995(6)
0.1598(14)
2.7(2)
1.00

OL21
8f
0.4057(4)
0.0815(16)
0.2447(3)
2.7(2)
1.00

OE21
8f
0.6520(11)
0.59342(6)
0.0754(8)
2.7(2)
1.00

OE11
8f
0.5743(13)
0.2282(14)
0.1098(11)
2.7(2)
1.00

OE22
8f
0.3953(6)
0.626(2)
0.1220(12)
2.7(2)
1.00

OE12
8f
0.3696(12)
0.0106(3)
0.0652(10)
2.7(2)
1.00

= 1.237
= 1.598
= 1.134
= 4.301
χ²= 2

Table 2: Atomic distances(Å) and angles in LiGd(PO₃)₄ with standard deviations in parentheses.

Tetrahedra
aroundP1

P1-OL12
1.534(4)
OL12 -OL21
2.381(12)
OL12—P1—OE11
111.61(38)

P1-OL21
1.535(4)
OL12 -OE21
2.446(11)
OL12—P1—OL21
101.76(23)

P1-OE11
1.534(11)
OL12 -OL21
2.463(14)
OL12—P1—OE12
105.86(29)

P1-OE12
1.535(12)
OL12 -OE11
2.538(11)
OL21—P1—OE11
117.46(53)

OL12 -OE22
2.482(12)
OL21—P1—OE12
105.55(40)

OL12 -OE12
2.448(15)
OE12—P1—OE11
113.37(47)

Tetrahedra
around P2

P2 -OL12
1.5343(13)
OE22 -OL12
2.482(12)
OE22—P2—OE21
113.09(39)

P2 -OL21
1.534(6)
OE22 -OL21
2.619(12)
OE22—P2—OL12
108.04(41)

P2 -OE21
1.535(10)
OE22 -OE21
2.560
OE22—P2—OL21
117.27(36)

P2 -OE22
1.533(7)
OL21 -OL12
2.381(12)
OE21—P2—OL12
105.66(4)

OL21 -OL12
2.440(11)
OE21—P2—OL21
105.25(16)

OE21 -OE22
2.560(13)
OL12—P2—OL21
106.79(38)

Polyhedra
around Gd
Tetrahedra  
around Li

Gd -OE21
2.489(6)
Li -OE21

Gd -Gd
5.592(2)

Gd -OE21
2.489(6)
Li -OE21

Li -Gd
3.533(2)

Gd -OE11
2.283(13)
Li -OE12

Li -Li
5.068(0)

Gd -OE11
2.283(13)
Li -OE12

P1 - P2
2.8710(4)

Gd-OE22
2.197(13)

P2 -P1
2.7897(4)

Gd-OE22
2.197(13)

Gd -P1
6.256(2)

Gd-OE12
2.605(7)

Gd -OE12
2.605(7)

Symmetry  
code
i: x,1+y,z
ii:x,1+y,z  
iii:1.5-x,1+y,-z

iv:2-x,1-y,-z  
v:2-x,2-y,-z
vi:1-x,0.5+y,0.5-z

Figure 1: The Rietveld analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns for LiGd(PO₃)₄.

The LGP structure can be simply described as three-dimensional framework of GdO₈ polyhedra linked to (PO₄)3– rings by Gd-O-P bridges. This framework delimits interesting tunnels with Li⁺ ions which are bonded to four oxygen atoms (LiO₄). Each LiO₄ tetrahedron shares all four O atoms with two LaO₈ polyhedra and four different PO₄ tetrahedra. A view of this structure projected along the b axis is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The structural arrangement of the LiGd(PO₃)₄ viewed in the (0 1 0) plane.

3.2. X-Ray Powder Diffraction

X-ray diffraction patterns of (PO₃)₄ (where x= 0, 0.02 and 0.04) are shown in Figure 3. The obtained crystalline phases are isotypes of the mother-phase LiGd(PO₃)₄ [27]. Mainly, it is shown that XR diffraction peaks of studied solids, with different percentages of europium, are described in a cell with a super space group I 2/a instead of C 2/c usually used in crystallographic data of the old LGP. The same XRD pattern is obtained for almost of synthesized compounds, even at high Eu³⁺ concentrations. However, a shift of the diffraction peaks to the lower 2 is observed. This shift can be explained by Bragg’s theory “= sin” (where is the X-ray wavelength (Cu =1.5406Å), is diffraction angle, and d is interplanar distance of corresponding diffraction peaks). Therefore, is constant; it can be concluded that this shift is due to the increase of interplanar distance “d”. Considering the characteristics of Gd and Eu (ionic radius of Gd⁺³: 1.05 Å, Eu⁺³: 1.07 Å and atomic volume Gd: 19.9 cm³/mol, Eu: 28.9 cm³/mol), this phenomenon can be attributed to the distortion of the tetrahedra of polyphosphates upon europium insertion [28].

Figure 3: XRD patterns of (PO₃)₄ ( x=0, 0.02 and 0.04).

The crystallite size of obtained polyphosphates is calculated using Sherrer’s equation below [29] and values are summarized in Table 3. Results show that the range of calculated crystallite size is between 42.49 and 42.79 nm, which prove that the synthesized compounds are nanometric.

where is the X-ray wavelength (Cu =1.5406Å), is the Bragg diffraction angle, and βe is the full width at half -maximum (FWHM) in radian of the main peak of each XRD pattern.

Table 3: The size of the crystallite according to percentage of europium.

Percentages (%)
FWHM
Position(2)
D(nm)

0
0.189
20.630
42.49

2
0.189
20.628
42.79

4
0.189
20.621
42.79

3.3. Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy Investigations

3.3.1. Infrared

Figure 4 shows the IR spectra of all studied compounds. The comparison of spectra (Figure 4) and those obtained in previous works in literature for condensed polyphosphates [30, 31] proves that positions of infrared absorption bands are characteristic of phosphates with chain structures.

Figure 4: IR spectra of (PO₃)₄ ( x=0, 0.02 and 0.04).

IR bands attribution is carried out based on groups and P-O-P bridges vibrations [32, 33]. The IR absorption spectra show the presence of two bands around 1249 cm which are assigned to the asymmetric stretching vibration () of O-P-O. The weak band observed between 1071 and 1136 cm is attributed to the symmetric stretching vibration of O-P-O. The large and intense band around 944 cm is assigned to the asymmetric vibration of P-O-P. We can also attribute the few bands at 689-818 cm to the symmetric vibration (P-O-P). At low frequencies region, below 600 cm, it is very difficult to distinguish the symmetric and antisymmetric bending modes of the (O-P-O) and (P-O-P) groups. The frequencies of the corresponding bands are given in Table 4.

Table 4: Attributions of main IR bands () of (PO₃)₄ samples.

Assignment
x=0
x=0.02
x= 0.04

OPO
1257
1241
1250

1137
1127
1149

OPO
1089
1089
109

POP
1014
1014
1014

944
944
947

POP
689
689
689

736
736
736

761
758
761

818
818
818

POP
437-
437
437

POP
456
456
457

519
519
521

586
585
585

The major difference between the IR spectra of cyclic polyphosphate and polyphosphate is the absence of vibration bands between 750 and 1000 cm. In this range, IR spectroscopy confirms the structure as long as polyphosphates chains.

3.3.2. Raman

The Raman spectra of (PO₃)₄ (where x= 0, 0.02 and 0.04) at room temperature are shown in Figure 5. These spectra show the presence of many bands; the first intense band at 1178 cm and the second at 700 cm are assigned to antisymmetric stretching vibration mode (O-P-O) and symmetric stretching vibrations mode (P-O-P), respectively. The (P-O-P) asymmetric and (O-P-O) symmetric stretching vibration modes, respectively, appear in the 1000-1100 cm and 1212-1296 cm ranges. The bands under 599 cm are attributed to the symmetric and the asymmetric bending vibrations ( and ) of (O-P-O)⁻ and (P-O-P). The intense symmetric stretching vibrations bands around 700 and 1178 cm are characteristic of phosphoric anions [34].

Figure 5: Raman spectra of LiGd(PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04) at 300 K.

Distinguishing characteristic cyclotetraphosphates and polyphosphates compounds exit also in the Raman spectrum. The symmetric stretching vibration of the P-O-P ( (P-O-P)) has a single band at 700 cm. This is the strongest of all the Raman vibration bands. That is because of the monoclinic symmetry of LGP doped Eu and the different positions of the lanthanide and alkali ions. The results of Raman spectroscopy can identify the structure of alkali metal lanthanide polyphosphates.

3.4. DTA (Differential Thermal Analysis)

The thermal stability of lithium polyphosphate is investigated using DTA. The curves of the Eu: LiGd(PO₃)₄ crystal are given in Figure 6. It is clearly observed that the curves present the same shape (evolution). Indeed, a single sharp endothermic peak is observed between 900 and 1000°C for all samples, which exhibits the characteristics of a first-order phase transition. This signal can be attributed to the decomposition of polyphosphates to GdPO₄. The stability of lithium gadolinium polyphosphates can be explained by heavily distorted of PO₄ tetrahedra as are the GdO₈ polyhedra. We thus conclude that all compounds are stable at high temperatures and it is monophasic.

Figure 6: DTA of (PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04).

3.5. Magnetic Study

The magnetic susceptibility and inverse magnetic susceptibility versus temperature of LiGd(PO₃)₄, LiGd0.98Eu0.02(PO₃)₄, and LiGd0.96Eu0.04(PO₃)₄ are shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9, respectively. The only other reported type of rare earth polyphosphate structures are those of LGP: Eu³⁺; and these were chosen because Gd³⁺ has an effective magnetic moment and the electrons.

Figure 7: The magnetic susceptibility () and inverse magnetic susceptibility () measurements as a function of temperature of LiGd(PO₃)₄.

Figure 8: The magnetic susceptibility () and inverse magnetic susceptibility () measurements as a function temperature of LiGd0.98Eu0.02(PO₃)₄.

Figure 9: The magnetic susceptibility () and inverse magnetic susceptibility () measurements as a function temperature of LiGd0.96Eu0.04(PO₃)₄.

These curves prove that all three rare earth polyphosphate compounds exhibit a paramagnetic response. The nondoped LGP is the most paramagnetic one; this is explained by their structural stability. Indeed, the addition of europium in the host disturbs samples in crystallinity. The response for LGP obeys Curie’s Law very well; this is consistent with the (⁸S7/2) ground state of Gd³⁺, which has no orbital angular momentum and so is unaffected by crystal field effects. Fitting, the temperature dependence of the inverse of susceptibility χ⁻¹ in high temperatures is given by the formula [35]

where is the Weiss temperature and C is the Curie constant given by

where N is the number of carriers of magnetic moment, μ₀ is the vacuum permeability, is the Boltzmann constant, is the Bohr magnetron, and is effective moment of carriers. Samples’ structure consists of one magnetic species (i), possessing each a magnetic moment (i); the magnetic susceptibility is given by the relation:

Generally, the magnetic moment is determined by

where is the Lande factor and J is the total angular moment. The theoretical effective paramagnetic moment for the samples can be calculated by

Curves of χ⁻¹ versus temperature allow deducing values, which are summarized in Table 5. We can notice that the values of decrease with the decrease of Gd percentage in the system, due to the important magnetic moment of Gd³⁺ ions (7.94). The comparison between the theoretical and the experimental effective moment values shows that the former are higher than the latter. This result can be associated with the increase of disorder in the matrix (LGP). On the other side, when the temperature increases to more than 75K, it induces a thermal agitation and causes magnetic moments disorientation of atoms in Eu doped LGP polyphosphates. Consequently, a decrease of paramagnetism is clearly observed (Figure 10).

Table 5: Values of C, (), and () for the (PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04) compounds.

x=0
x=0.02
x=0.04

C (μB.KT⁻¹)
5.26
5
2.86

(μB)
7.94
7.86
7.78

(μB)
6.50
6.32
4.65

Figure 10: Magnetic measurements of (PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04).

3.6. Luminescence Properties

3.6.1. Excitation

Excitation spectra of LiGd(PO₃)₄, doped with europium (2, 4%) (Figure 11), are measured at 300K under emission with = 591 nm. Figure 11 shows broad band from 254 to 271 nm. These bands are assigned to the charge transfer bands (CTB), resulting from the transfer of an electron from the orbital 2p⁶ of the ligand O²⁻ to the empty state of the configuration [Xe]4f⁶ of the Eu³⁺ ion (Eu³⁺- transition). The maximum of the CTB is located at 245 nm. The differences between broadening and positions of the maxima intensities of the CTB in polyphosphate indicate their dependence on the host lattices [36]. This is due to the strong binding of the oxygen ligands in the polyphosphate compound [37].

Figure 11: Excitation spectra with =591 nm of (PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04) at 300 K.

At low frequencies, several groups of narrow bands in the spectral region 271-310 nm are clearly observed and assigned to ⁸S7/2→⁶HJ, ⁸S7/2→, ⁸S7/2→, ⁸S7/2→, and ⁸S7/2→transitions of the Gd³⁺ ion. LiYF₄:Gd³⁺ crystal is used as reference to identify excitation bands, which describe the basis of the detailed energy level scheme proposed for the trivalent gadolinium [38]. The presence of band in the range between 271 and 310 nm indicates the presence of energy transfer between the two rare earths, which occurs from Gd³⁺ to Eu³⁺ in the matrix. However, there is no CTB of Eu³⁺– or energy transfer band Gd³⁺-Eu³⁺ above 310 nm. Excitation spectra within the wavelength range of 310–550 nm, show only the intrinsic transitions 4f-4f from the ground state ⁷F₀ to different excited levels (⁵D, or ⁵L) of Eu³⁺ ion. These transitions are assigned as follows: ⁷F₀→ at 316 nm, ⁷F₀→⁵D₄ at 362 nm, ⁷F₀→⁵G₂, ⁵L₇ at 382 nm, 7F₀→⁵L₆ at 393 nm, 7F₀→⁵D₃ at 417 nm, ⁷F₀→⁵D₂ at 464 nm,and ⁷F₀→⁵D₁ at 502 nm. All these assignments and wavelengths are given in Table 6. Most of the excitation bands are broadened and some of them overlap together to form a strong band, particularly the band between 369 and 409 nm with FWHM of about 18 nm.

Table 6: Excitation lines attribution of Eu³⁺ doped LiGd(PO₃)₄.

Wavelength (nm)
Attribution

287
⁷F₀→⁵I₆

294
⁷F₀→⁵F₄

297
⁷F₀→⁵F₂

6318
⁷F₀→⁵H₆

321
⁷F₀→⁵H₄

328
⁷F₀→⁵H₇

363
⁷F₀→⁵D₄

376
⁷F₁→⁵D₄

373-390
⁷F₀→

394
⁷F₀→⁵L₆

405
⁷F₁→⁵L₆

416
⁷F₀→⁵D₃

464
⁷F₀→⁵D₂

526
⁷F₀→⁵D₁

The perfect match of this excitation band with the emission wavelength of NUV In GaN-based LED chips makes these phosphors conveniently useful in white LEDs [39]. Figure 11 shows that the band intensities increase with europium concentration. However, they maintain the same shape and position.

3.6.2. Emission

The emission spectra of condensed phosphates are recorded at ambient temperature (300K) and in the range of 500-750 nm after excitation with = 394 nm (Figure 12). These spectra present the same shapes, with bands intensity proportional to Eu³⁺ active ion concentration. However, we notice that the undoped LiGd(PO₃)₄ polyphosphate does not emit light. The observed emission bands are attributed to the following transitions: ⁵D₀→ (where J = 0,1,2,3 or 4) of Eu³⁺ ion in the matrix LiGd(PO₃)₄ [40, 41].

Figure 12: Emission spectra with =394 nm of (PO₃)₄ (x=0, 0.02 and 0.04) at 300 K.

Figure 12 proves the presence of five bands in the emission spectra where the most intense ones are those situated at 578-600 nm (⁵D₀→⁷F₁) and 604-634 nm (⁵D₀→⁷F₂). The other emission bands are observed at 554 nm (⁵D₀→⁷F₀), 660 nm (⁵D₀→⁷F₃), and 686-706 nm (⁵D₀→⁷F₄). The corresponding assignments and wavelengths of these emissions are given in Table 7. The relative intensities of the most intense transitions ⁵D₀ →⁷F₀, ⁷F₁, ⁷F₂  ⁷F₃ and ⁷F₄ are strongly influenced by the nature of the host and the crystalline environment [42]. Therefore, the dominance of magnetic dipole (MD) transition ⁵D₀→⁷F₁ of Eu³⁺ means that Eu³⁺ occupies a site in the crystal lattice with inversion symmetry. However, in the case of absence of symmetry inversion in the site of Eu³⁺, the main emission would be the electric dipole (ED) transition ⁵D₀→⁷F₂ [43]. The synthesized polyphosphates showed that orange emission transition (⁵D₀→⁷F₁) is slightly dominated. This indicates that Eu³⁺ occupies a site in the crystal lattice with symmetry inversion.

Table 7: Emission attribution of Eu³⁺ doped LiGd(PO₃)₄.

Transitions
Wavelengths (nm)

⁵D₀→⁷F₀
554

⁵D₀→⁷F₁
578-601

⁵D₀→⁷F₂
604-634

⁵D₀→⁷F₃
660

⁵D₀→⁷F₄
686-706

4. Conclusion

Polyphosphates of rare earth and alkali metal LGP:Eu³⁺ were successfully synthesized by solid-state reaction at 730°C. XRD patterns proved that the obtained samples crystallize in a monoclinic single phase with space group I 2/a and following cell parameters a= 9.635(3) Å, b= 7.035(3) Å, c= 13.191(3) Å, β= 90.082°, V= 894.214 Å³, and Z= 4. The synthesized polyphosphates showed a good thermal stability until 940°C. Spectroscopic analyses by IR and Raman spectra confirmed the acyclic zig-zag chain of (PO₄)3– in LGP structure, involving GdO₈ dodecahedra and LiO₄ polyhedra. The magnetic susceptibility carried out on single crystals revealed that the title compounds were paramagnetic between 5 and 300 K. An increase in excitation and emission bands intensities was observed with the increase of europium concentration. The presence of band in the range between 271 and 310 nm in excitation spectra proved the energy transfer process from Gd³⁺ to Eu³⁺. The dominance of ⁵D₀→⁷F₁ transition in the emission spectra confirms that Eu³⁺ occupies a site in the crystal lattice with symmetry inversion. The change in transition bands intensity proves that LGP phosphates affect europium environment.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

L. Campayo, F. Audubert, and D. Bernache-Assollant, “Synthesis study of alkaline-bearing rare earth phosphates with rhabdophane structure,” Solid State Ionics, vol. 176, no. 35-36, pp. 2663–2669, 2005.

J. Zhu, H. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Guan, and X. Xiao, “Structure determination, electronic and optical properties of rubidium holmium polyphosphate RbHo(PO₃)₄,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1030, pp. 204–208, 2012.

S. Yang and Z. Chen, “The Study on Aging and Degradation Mechanism of Ammonium Polyphosphate in Artificial Accelerated Aging,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 211, pp. 906–910, 2018.

M. El Masloumi, I. Imaz, J. P. Chaminade et al., “Synthesis, crystal structure and vibrational spectra characterization of MILa(PO₃)₄ (MI = Na, Ag),” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 178, pp. 3581–3588, 2005.

J. M. Cole, M. R. Lees, J. A. K. Howard, R. J. Newport, G. A. Saunders, and E. Schönherr, “Crystal Structures and Magnetic Properties of Rare-Earth Ultraphosphates, RP₅O₁₄ (R=La, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd),” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 150, pp. 377–382, 2000.

J. J. Gavaldà, I. Parreu, R. Solé, X. Solans, F. Díaz, and M. Aguiló, “Growth and Structural Characterization of Rb₃Yb₂(PO₄)₃: A New Material for Laser and Nonlinear Optical Applications,” J. Chemistry of Materials, vol. 17, no. 26, pp. 6746–6754, 2005.

M. Ferid and K. Horchani-Naifer, “Structure and ionic conductivity of NaCeP₂O₇,” Journal of Solid State Ionics, vol. 176, pp. 1949–1953, 2005.

K. Jaouadi, N. Zouari, T. Mhiri, and M. Pierrot, “Synthesis and crystal structure of sodium–bismuth polyphosphate NaBi(PO₃)₄,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 273, no. 3-4, pp. 638–645, 2005.

M. Amria, N. Zouaria, T. Mhiri, A. Daoud, and P. Gravereau, “Crystal structure and conductivity investigation of KDyP₄O₁₂: a new potassium dysprosium cyclotetraphosphate,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 782, pp. 16–23, 2006.

D. P. Minh, A. R. Sane, N. Semlal, P. Sharrock, and A. Nzihou, “Alkali polyphosphates as new potential materials for thermal energy storage,” Journal of Solar Energy, vol. 157, pp. 277–283, 2017.

Z. Mua, Y. Hub, L. Chen et al., “A reddish orange stoichiometric phosphor LiEu(PO₃)₄ for white light-emitting diodes,” Journal of Ceramics International, vol. 40, pp. 2575–2579, 2014.

J. Zhong, H. Liang, Q. Su, J. Zhou, I. V. Khodyuk, and P. Dorenbos, “Radioluminescence properties of Ce³⁺-activated MGd(PO₃)₄ (M = Li, Na, K, Cs),” Optical Materials, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 378–381, 2009.

J. Gu, J. Zhong, H. Liang, J. Zhang, and Q. Su, “Competitive absorption of Eu³⁺ and Tb³⁺codoped in NaGd(PO₃)₄ phosphors,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 592, pp. 261–264, 2014.

B. Han, H. Liang, H. Ni et al., “Intense red light emission of Eu³⁺-doped LiGd(PO₃)₄ for mercury-free lamps and plasma display panels application,” J. of Optics Express, vol. 17, pp. 7138–7144, 2009.

T. Shalapska, G. Stryganyuk, P. Demchenko, A. Voloshinovskii, and P. Dorenbos, “Luminescence properties of Ce³⁺-doped LiGdP₄O₁₂ upon vacuum-ultraviolet and x-ray excitation,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 21, no. 44, Article ID 445901, 2009.

B. Han, H. Liang, Y. Huang, Y. Tao, and Q. Su, “Vacuum Ultraviolet−Visible Spectroscopic Properties of Tb³⁺ in Li(Y, Gd)(PO₃)₄: Tunable Emission, Quantum Cutting, and Energy Transfer,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. C114, no. 14, pp. 6770–6777, 2010.

R. Shi, G. Liu, H. Liang, Y. Huang, Y. Tao, and J. Zhang, “Consequences of ET and MMCT on Luminescence of Ce³⁺, Eu³⁺, and Tb³⁺-doped LiYSiO₄,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 15, pp. 7777–7786, 2016.

A. Krasnikov, T. Shalapska, G. Stryganyuk, A. Voloshinovskii, and S. Zazubovich, “Photoluminescence and energy transfer in Eu³⁺-doped alkali gadolinium phosphates,” Physica Status Solidi (b) – Basic Solid State Physics, vol. 250, no. 7, pp. 1418–1425, 2013.

J. Zhong, H. Liang, Q. Su, and J. Zhou, “Luminescence properties of NaGd(PO₃)₄:Eu³⁺ and energy transfer from Gd³⁺ to Eu³⁺,” Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, vol. 98, pp. 139–147, 2010.

W. Xu, J.-G. Dai, Z. Ding, and Y. Wang, “Polyphosphate-modified calcium aluminate cement under normal and elevated temperatures: Phase evolution, microstructure, and mechanical properties,” Ceramics International, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 15525–15536, 2017.

B. Liu, Y. Chen, C. Shi, H. Tang, and Y. Tao, “Visible quantum cutting in BaF₂: Gd, Eu downconversion,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 101, no. 1-2, pp. 155–159, 2003.

H. Kondo, T. Hirai, and S. Hashimoto, “Dynamical behavior of quantum cutting in alkali gadolinium fluoride phosphors,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 108, no. 1-4, pp. 59–63, 2004.

N. Kodama and Y. Watanabe, “Visible quantum cutting through downconversion in Eu³⁺-doped KGd₃F₁₀ and KGd₂F₇ crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 4141–4143, 2004.

P. Ghosh, S. Tang, and A.-V. Mudring, “Efficient quantum cutting in hexagonal NaGdF₄:Eu³⁺nanorods,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 24, pp. 8640–8644, 2011.

J. Legendziewicz, M. Guzik, and J. Cybińska, “VUV spectroscopy of double phosphates doped with rare earth ions,” Optical Materials, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 567–574, 2009.

S. Hammami, S. Sebai, D. Jegouso, V. Reita, N. C. Boudjada, and A. Megriche, “Magnetic and Photon Cascade Emission of Gd³⁺ of NaGd(PO₃)₄ Monocrystal Under Appropriate Synthesis Conditions,” Journal of Physical Chemistry & J Biophysics, vol. 7, pp. 2161–0398, 2017.

H. Ettis, H. Naïli, and T. Mhiri, “The crystal structure, thermal behaviour and ionic conductivity of a novel lithium gadolinium polyphosphate LiGd(PO₃)₄,” Journal of Solid State Chemistry, vol. 179, no. 10, pp. 3107–3113, 2006.

R. Shannon, “Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides,” Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography, vol. 32, pp. 751–767, 1976.

T. Gholami and M. Salavati-Niasari, “Green facile thermal decomposition synthesis, characterization and electrochemical hydrogen storage characteristics of ZnAl₂O₄nanostructure,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 27, pp. 17167–17177, 2017.

S. Sebai, S. Hammami, A. Megriche, D. Zambon, and R. Mahiou, “Synthesis, structural characterization and VUV excited luminescence properties of LixNa(1-x)Sm(PO₃)₄ polyphosphates,” Optical Materials, vol. 62, pp. 578–583, 2016.

T. Sun, Y. Zhang, P. Shan et al., “Growth, structure, thermal properties and spectroscopic characteristics of Nd³⁺- doped KGdP₄O₁₂ crystal,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 6, Article ID e100922, 2014.

W. Rekik, H. Naïli, T. Mhiri, and T. Bataille, “[NH₃(CH₂)₂NH₃][Co(SO₄)₂(H₂O)₄]: Chemical preparation, crystal structure, thermal decomposition and magnetic properties,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2709–2718, 2008.

J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Zhang et al., “Polymorphism of BaTeMo₂O₉: a new polar polymorph and the phase transformation,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3752–3761, 2011.

K. Jaouadi, H. Naili, N. Zouari, T. Mhiri, and A. Daoud, “Synthesis and crystal structure of a new form of potassium–bismuth polyphosphate KBi(PO₃)₄,” Alloys Compds, vol. 354, no. 30, p. 104, 2003.

D. Petrov, B. Angelov, and V. Lovchinov, “Magnetic and XPS studies of lithium lanthanide tetraphosphates LiLnP₄O₁₂ (Ln=Nd, Gd, Er),” Journal of Rare Earths, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 485–489, 2013.

S. Hachani, B. Moine, A. El-akrmi, and M. Férid, “Luminescent properties of some ortho- and pentaphosphates doped with Gd³⁺–Eu³⁺: Potential phosphors for vacuum ultraviolet excitation,” Optical Materials, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 678–684, 2009.

M. Ferhi, K. Horchani-Naifer, and M. Férid, “Spectroscopic properties of Eu³⁺-doped KLa(PO₃)₄ and LiLa(PO₃)₄ powders,” Optical Materials, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2011.

R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, A. Meijerink, R. J. Lamminmäki, and J. Hölsä, “Vacuum-ultraviolet spectroscopy and quantum cutting for Gd³⁺ in LiYF₄,” Physical Review B, vol. 56, no. 21, pp. 13841–13848, 1997.

M. Abdelhedi, K. Horchani-Naifer, M. Dammak, and M. Ferid, “Structural and spectroscopic properties of pure and doped LiCe(PO₃)₄,” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 70, pp. 303–308, 2015.

E. E. S. Teotonio, H. F. Brito, M. C. F. C. Felinto, L. C. Thompson, V. G. Young, and O. L. Malta, “Preparation, crystal structure and optical spectroscopy of the rare earth complexes (RE³⁺=Sm, Eu, Gd and Tb) with 2-thiopheneacetate anion,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 751, no. 1-3, pp. 85–94, 2005.

A. Mbarek, “Synthesis, structural and optical properties of Eu³⁺-doped ALnP₂O₇ (A = Cs, Rb, Tl; Ln = Y, Lu, Tm) pyrophosphates phosphors for solid-state lighting,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 1138, pp. 149–154, 2017.

D. C. Tuan, R. Olazcuaga, F. Guillen, A. Garcia, B. Moine, and C. Fouassier, “Luminescent properties of Eu³⁺-doped yttrium or gadolinium phosphates,” J. of Physics, vol. 123, pp. 259–263, 2005.

M. Gaft, G. Panczer, R. Reisfeld, I. Shinno, B. Champagnon, and G. Boulon, “Laser-induced Eu³⁺ luminescence in zircon ZrSiO₄,” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 87, pp. 1032–1035, 2000.