International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 7278531, 16 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7278531

Research Article

Robust Consensus Control for Linear Discrete-Time Swarm Systems with Parameter Uncertainties and Time-Varying Delays

Xiao Jia, Laihong Hu, Fujun Feng, and Jun Xu

Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi’an 710025, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Fujun Feng; f_fjun@163.com

Received 19 November 2018; Accepted 27 June 2019; Published 24 July 2019

Academic Editor: Paolo Gasbarri

Copyright © 2019 Xiao Jia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Robust consensus control problems of linear swarm systems with parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays are investigated. In this literature, a linear consensus protocol for high-order discrete-time swarm systems is proposed. Firstly, the robust consensus control problem of discrete-time swarm systems is transformed into a robust control problem of a set of independent uncertain systems. Secondly, sufficient linear matrix inequality conditions for robust consensus analysis of discrete-time swarm systems are given by the stability theory, and a performance level is determined meanwhile. Thirdly, the convergence result is derived as a final consensus value of swarm systems. Finally, numerical examples are presented to demonstrate theoretical results.

1. Introduction

As a hot topic of swarm systems, distributed cooperative control for swarm systems has gained an increasing attention from many communities because of its wide applications in various areas including rendezvous [1–3], filtering [4–6], formation control [7–9], synchronization of power-driven machine [10–12], and other areas [13–16]. It should be also pointed out that some relevant novel nearest results in aerospace have been reported in [17–19]. Furthermore, as an essential research aspect of distributed cooperative control for swarm systems, the consensus problem, which is referred to an agreement on some common values by all agents, has received extensive research in recent years [20–22].

According to the difference of the system dynamics, the research objective of the consensus problem for swarm systems can be classified into three types: first-order swarm systems, second-order swarm systems, and high-order swarm systems. For first-order swarm systems, the consensus problem with input and communication delays was studied by the frequency analysis in [23]. The consensus of second-order agents with multiple time-varying delays was investigated based on the graph theory in [24]. In combination with realistic applications, high-order swarm systems are more valuable and general than low-order swarm systems due to the practicality and complexity of the former. Some significant theoretical achievements about the consensus of continuous-time high-order swarm systems have been discovered in [25]. However, digital signals are processed rather than analog signals under engineering background, so discrete-time swarm systems should be paid more attention. The distributed output feedback consensus problem of general linear model discrete-time swarm systems with fixed topology was presented in [26, 27]. Based upon the leader-following model, the consensus problem of discrete-time swarm systems with directed graphs and external disturbances was investigated in [28]. Furthermore, the consensus problem of discrete-time swarm systems with switching topologies based on the matrix inequality theory was presented in [29–31].

As the industrial technology continues to develop, the research on the control theory becomes more mature. Due to operating state changes, external disturbances and model errors of swarm systems in the real world, robust consensus control problems of swarm systems were wildly explored by researchers, as shown in [32–34]. Robust consensus control problems of first-order swarm systems with external disturbances and model uncertainties were presented in [32]. The second-order robust consensus control problem of swarm systems with measurement noises and asymmetric delays was studied in [33]. Distributed and consensus control problems of high-order linear swarm systems with dependent noise were investigated in [34]. However, due to the general existence of parameter uncertainties and time delays of swarm systems in practical application, it is more meaningful and important to take these constraints into consideration in the theoretical analysis of robust consensus control problems of high-order linear discrete-time swarm systems, which can been deemed as inadequately available in current literature.

As is well known, precise dynamics models of swarm systems can be hardly established in practice, and many kinds of faults in systems can also contribute to uncertainties of the dynamics model. Besides, components of systems will be out of order or aged with the increase of working hours. Therefore, researches on the robust consensus problem of high-order linear discrete-time swarm systems with parameter uncertainties are very valuable and significant. Moreover, time delays cannot be avoided in nature and they take place so commonly in biological, physical, and electrical systems. The acquisition of parameters becomes more difficult when time delays exist in systems. If time delays are ignored when the consensus problem of swarm systems with parameter uncertainties is discussed, the stability of the system is hard to be guaranteed. Motivated by the above analysis, for high-order linear discrete-time swarm systems with parameter uncertainties to achieve consensus by the robust control method, time delays are necessary to be considered and the problem remains the most open as we know.

This paper studies robust control consensus problems of high-order linear discrete-time swarm systems with parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays, and the innovations of this paper are threefold: (i) a sufficient linear matrix inequality (LMI) condition such that swarm systems can achieve the robust consensus subject to parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays is derived; (ii) a performance index of swarm systems is obtained; and (iii) the final consensus value of swarm systems is developed. Compared with the previous work on the robust consensus of high-order swarm systems, the novelties of this literature are also threefold. Firstly, only the robust consensus of high-order linear swarm systems was investigated in [35–39], where the performance index was not obtained. However, in order to show the performance of the robust consensus of high-order linear discrete-time swarm systems, the performance index, which is necessary and important, was involved in this paper. Secondly, the final consensus value was obtained by LMI theory in this paper, which could better show the advantages of the proposed consensus protocol, but most existing works for the robust consensus of high-order linear swarm systems subject to parameter uncertainties and time delays, including [35–38], did not consider this useful point. Thirdly, to better correspond with the practical application, influences of time delays on the robust consensus of swarm systems were sufficiently considered in this paper, which did not appear in [37–39].

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 states several important conclusions of the graph theory and the problem description in which the robust consensus protocol is proposed. Section 4 shows a sufficient LMI condition that can guarantee the robust consensus of swarm systems and a final consensus value of swarm systems. The effectiveness of theoretical results is illustrated via simulation examples in Section 5. Finally, Section 5 draws the conclusion.

Notations. A matrix can be defined to be positive if each entry of the matrix is positive. A square matrix can be known as Schur stable if each eigenvalue of the matrix lies in the open unit disk . denotes the diagonal matrix, where are diagonal entries. refers to the expectation. The symbol represents the Kronecker product. The transpose of a matrix is denoted as . stands for the identity matrix with appropriate dimension. Let be the vector of ones with all components 1.

2. Preliminaries and Problem Description

2.1. Graph Theory

In general, exchanges of information among agents in swarm systems can be shown as a directed graph , where denotes the node set, represents the edge set, and refers to the weighted adjacency matrix with the element if while if . Define the node index of graph as a finite index set . Let stand for the set of all neighbours of node , where the information flows from node to node . Let subset of the nodes in graph be a cluster. Suppose that represents the neighbour set of a cluster . It can be defined that the in-degree matrix of node is , and the out-degree matrix of node is . Note that a diagonal matrix can be provided to describe the degree matrix of digraph , which is defined as follows:

The definition of the Laplacian matrix in connection with digraph can be shown in matrix form as .

2.2. Problem Description

Consider a linear swarm system composed of homogeneous agents marked as , in which the th agent’s dynamics can be expressed as a state update equation

where indicates the state vector; and , respectively, represent the input matrix and the external disturbance; , , , and are the given constant matrices; is the control output; and stand for uncertainties in the system matrix and input channel, respectively, such that

where denotes a positive constant matrix and refers to an unknown matrix function which meets constraints as follows:

The parameter uncertainties and are considered permissible when equations (3) and (4) hold meanwhile.

Remark 1. When there is the external disturbance in system (2), external disturbance belongs to signal shown in [33, 40], which satisfies , that is, the energy of the external disturbance in system (2) is bounded on any finite interval. In this case, the robust control problem can be analysed in an appropriate and meaningful way.

To achieve consensus for linear swarm system (2), the following control protocols are adopted:

where , is a constant gain matrix with appropriate dimensions, and denotes time-varying delays of swarm systems. Then, to show the consensus analysis and design for swarm system (2), the definition is presented as follows:

Definition 1. For the given gain matrix and any given bounded initial states, swarm system (2) with consensus protocol (5) are assured to arrive consensus if there exists a vector-valued depending on the initial states such that , where denotes the final consensus value.
Let , , and , and we can write swarm system (2) with equation (5) into a compact form as follows:

where and is an initial value at .

The suboptimal robust consensus control problem of system (6) is stated to find a distributed protocol (5) such that

(i)with , system (6) is asymptotically stable for all acceptable uncertain matrices (ii)with interpreted as deterministic signal, the transfer function from to of system (6), which is denoted by , satisfies for all acceptable uncertain matrices and a given allowable scalar , where , is the norm of , defined by

In order to make an in-depth analysis for the robust consensus control problem of system (6), we presume henceforth that the communication graph is connected and give the following lemma about the graph theory.

Lemma 1 (see [41]). For the Laplacian matrix associated with an undirected graph , the following description holds: (i) 0 is an eigenvalue of , and its corresponding eigenvector is , and (ii) 0 is a simple eigenvalue of , and all the other eigenvalues are positive and real if is connected.

Assume that denotes eigenvalues of matrix of an undirected graph . Moreover, , which satisfies , is related to its corresponding eigenvector . Thus, an orthogonal matrix can be found in the form

such that .

Theorem 1. For a given , system (6) is asymptotically stable and , if and only if the following systems are simultaneously and asymptotically stable and all of the norms of their transfer function matrices are less than :

where and .

Proof. Let be the eigenvalues of matrix for an undirected topology , where with the corresponding eigenvector , and . An orthogonal matrix can be found in the form

such that . Assume that

Then, system (6) can be rewritten in terms of as

Furthermore, reformulate the disturbance variable and the performance variable via

Subsequently, substituting (12) and (13) into (11) gives

In fact, system (14) consists of individual systems in (6). Denote by and the transfer function matrices of system (14) and (6), respectively. Afterwards, we can deduce from equations (6), (12), (13), and (14) that

which implies that

Therefore, the proof of Theorem 1 is completed.

In addition, it is worth mentioning that, let

By Lemma 1, we can convert system (14) into subsystems as follows:

Obviously, swarm system (6) can achieve consensus if subsystem (19) is asymptotically stable. Note that subsystem (18) determines the final consensus value of swarm system (6), and the details of it will be discussed below.

Remark 2. By Theorem 1, the distributed consensus control problem of swarm system (6) is transformed into the robust control problems of subsystems (8), so that a set of independent systems which have the same dimensions as a single agent in (2) is obtained. Therefore, the computational complexity is decreased evidently and the stability theory of swarm systems can be used. The essential tools producing this result by right of the state space decomposition approach.

3. Main Results

In this section, the robust stability and existence conditions of the consensus control problem for swarm system (2) with protocol (5) is provided by using a basis-dependent Lyapunov function and the LMI approach. Above all, we should introduce the following two lemmas.

Lemma 2 (Jensen inequality [42]). For any constant matrix , , and , positive integers and satisfying , an inequality holds as follows:

Lemma 3. Suppose that equal positive integer time-varying delays exist in whole communication network of swarm system (2). Meanwhile, the undirected graph is fixed and connected. Then, by use of control protocol (5), the robust consensus of swarm system (2) with -norm consensus performance bound can be achieved globally asymptotically if we can prove that, there are a feedback matrix with suitable dimensions and four positive-definite matrices , , , and with dimensions satisfying

where

Proof. For purpose of consensus analysis, we construct a Lyapunov function as follows:

where

for .
Then, we can define the derivative of as

From the solution of (8), can be rewritten as follows:

can be reformulated as

can be rewritten as

can be reformulated as

can be rewritten as

Furthermore, the term can be shown that

At the same time, according to Lemma 2, the following inequality holds:

Let . Then, it follows from (8) and (25)–(32) that

if system (8) is asymptotically stable. This implies that the robust consensus of swarm system (2) with -norm consensus performance bound can be achieved globally asymptotically by the use of control protocol (5) if matrix inequality (21) holds.
Therefore, the conclusion of Lemma 3 is drawn.

Remark 3. In Lemma 3, for making sure that system (8) can achieve robust consensus with a performance index , a sufficient condition is obtained. Nevertheless, it is not difficult to find that (21) is a nonlinear matrix inequality (NMI) and therein lies parameter uncertainties.
To cope with the uncertain matrices and the nonlinear terms of (21), the following two lemmas are given.

Lemma 4 (see [43]). For given matrices , , and of appropriate dimensions where is symmetric, a matrix inequality holds as follows:

for all subject to , if and only if there exists a scalar such that

Lemma 5 (Schur complement [44]). The linear matrix inequality

where , , and are dependent on , is the identical meaning as anyone of the following two descriptions:

(1), (2),

Theorem 2. Consider swarm system (2) with a fixed, undirected, and connected communication topology. The robust consensus of swarm system (2) with -norm consensus performance bound can be achieved globally asymptotically by use of control protocol (5) if we can find two scaling factors and , a feedback matrix with suitable dimensions and six positive-definite matrices , , , , , and with dimensions which are a settlement of the minimization problem as follows:

subject to

where and . It can also be said if the minimization problem (37)–(40) has an available settlement , , , , , , and , the robust consensus of swarm system (2) with -norm consensus performance bound can be achieved globally asymptotically by the use of control protocol (5).

Proof. Inequality (21) can be expressed as

According to Lemma 5, one can obtain that inequality (41) can be rewritten as follows:

By replacing and , inequality (42) is equivalently written as follows:

In virtue of Lemma 4 and Lemma 5, inequality (43) comes into existence for all acceptable uncertain matrices if and only if we can prove that there are two scaling factors and satisfying

By the Cone Complementarity Linearization (CCL) algorithm in [45], we set and . Then, the optimization problem (37)–(40) can be reasonably settled by transforming the nonlinear matrix inequality (NMI) (21).
Thus, the proof of Theorem 2 is completed.

Remark 4. According to Theorem 2, notice that the optimization problem (40)–(45) transformed from the NMI (21) can be reasonably solved based upon Algorithm 1. Hereafter, the linear swarm system (2) with the control protocol (5) achieves robust consensus.

Step 1: Seek out a set of available values of , , , and for LMI (38)–(40), if there does not exist, then exit. Set .

Step 2: Set , , , and and seek out , , , and which are a settlement for the LMI problem subject to LMI (38)–(40).

Step 3: If , then exit. Otherwise, set and switch to Step 2.

Algorithm 1: A possible way to the optimization problem (37)–(40).

It should be pointed out that the final outcome of first “exit” in Step 1 is that available initial values of , , , and cannot be obtained. In this case, we set and repeat Step 1. As long as the available values are obtained, we switch to Step 2. Then, second “exit” in Step 3 means that suitable values of , , , and are obtained.

Theorem 3. With interpreted as deterministic signal, when swarm system (6) achieves robust consensus with parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays, the final consensus value satisfies

where can be the following form:

for .

Proof. In the following, we consider two cases for the proof.
Case 1. ().
In this case, system (18) can be equivalently written as follows:

Assume that and , then from (10), we can uniquely decompose into . Considering the mentioned above, we can also conclude that if the robust consensus of system (6) is achieved, the subsystem (19) should be Schur stable, which implies that the response of system (19) due to complies with . Therefore, the final consensus value depends totally on . Since , we have , and because , then we can obtain , that is to say

Likewise, let and , then by (12), can be uniquely decomposed as . If system (6) achieves the robust consensus, the response of system (19) due to also should comply with . Since , we have , and because , then we can obtain , that is

Hence, we have

Case 2. ().
In this case, we also define and . Similarly, we can have and . By (18), we can obtain

Thus, the final consensus value complies with .
The conclusion of Theorem 3 is obtained.

Remark 5. With interpreted as deterministic signal, the final consensus value of system (6) is presented by Theorem 3. In the case, the final consensus value has two divisions, one is , which is associated with the system matrix , the neighbouring feedback matrix , and the initial state ; and the other is , which is related to the external disturbance . This implies that the external disturbance has an effect on the final consensus value, which is also related to the system matrix , the neighbouring feedback matrix , and the initial state . The result is different from that of the swarm system without external disturbances and parameter uncertainties, which is discussed in [29]. In the case, we get a linear recursion formula (51) for , which is the limit of the final consensus value as . This implies that the final consensus value is associated with the states , , and the external disturbance when .

4. Results and Discussion

In this section, we firstly use a simulation example to validate the effectiveness of the theoretical results, and then apply the control protocol (5) to achieve state consensus for a swarm system which consists of 8 agents. The dynamics of these agents are represented by (2), and relevant system matrices is given as follows:

where , , and are uncertain parameters satisfying , , and , respectively. Then, swarm system (2) can be reformulated as

We analyze the robust consensus among the above 8 agents with an undirected topology as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Communication topology .

Assume that the initial state of each agent is randomly given as , , , , , , , and and set , , , and . The dynamics of each agent is combined with protocol (5). Let and suppose that the exogenous disturbance inputs are selected as . By Theorem 2, we can get that

The simulation results are produced from Figures 2–4. The state trajectories of swarm system (2) are shown. In addition, the final consensus value deduced from Theorem 3 is marked with the red asterisk.

Figure 2: State 1 trajectories of swarm system (2).

Figure 3: State 2 trajectories of swarm system (2).

Figure 4: State 3 trajectories of swarm system (2).

In view of Figures 2–4, we can see easily that the state trajectories of swarm system (2) can be asymptotically convergent to the common value , associated with . From Definition 1, we can also find clearly that the robust consensus of swarm system (2) with control protocol (5) is achieved. Therefore, the effectiveness of the theoretical results is demonstrated.

5. Conclusions

Robust consensus control problems of linear high-order discrete-time swarm systems with parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays were investigated. A robust consensus control protocol was proposed while the impact of time-varying delays is involved. LMI conditions for robust consensus analysis were given, and a final consensus value was obtained from the derivation process. If swarm systems satisfy the sufficient LMI conditions, then we can ensure that swarm systems with parameter uncertainties and time-varying delays could achieve robust consensus, and the convergence result could be determined as a final consensus value. Finally, the effectiveness of the theoretical results was verified by relevant simulation examples. Further studies will focus on the impact of switching topologies and directed graphs on the consensus problem of linear discrete-time swarm systems.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation under grant #61763040 and grant #61867005. The authors would like to express my faithful gratitude to all those who helped me during the writing of this paper. We gratefully acknowledge the help of our supervisors, Mister Xiaogang Yang and Mister Jianxiang Xi, who have offered us patient instruction in the academic studies.

References

H. Li, J. Peng, X. Zhang, and Z. Huang, “Flocking of mobile agents using a new interaction model: a cyber-physical perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 2665–2675, 2017.

N. Cai, M. He, Q. Wu, and M. J. Khan, “On almost controllability of dynamical complex networks with noises,” Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, In press.

J. Gao, X. Xu, N. Ding, and E. Li, “Flocking motion of multi-agent system by dynamic pinning control,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 714–722, 2017.

B. Açıkmeşe, M. Mandić, and J. L. Speyer, “Decentralized observers with consensus filters for distributed discrete-time linear systems,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1037–1052, 2014.

G. Cui, Q. Ma, B. Zhang, F. L. Lewis, and S. Xu, “Distributed consensus tracking for non-linear multi-agent systems with input saturation: a command filtered backstepping approach,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 509–516, 2016.

C. L. Liu, L. Shan, Y. Y. Chen, and Y. Zhang, “Average-consensus filter of first-order multi-agent systems with disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1763–1767, 2018.

H. Liu, T. Ma, F. L. Lewis, and Y. Wan, “Robust formation control for multiple quadrotors with nonlinearities and disturbances,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, pp. 1–10, 2018.

X. Dong, Y. Zhou, Z. Ren, and Y. Zhong, “Time-varying formation tracking for second-order multi-agent systems subjected to switching topologies with application to quadrotor formation flying,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5014–5024, 2017.

Y. Qi, S. Zhou, Y. Kang, and S. Yan, “Formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles with directed and switching topologies,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 7657452, 8 pages, 2016.

N. Monshizadeh, H. L. Trentelman, and M. K. Camlibel, “Uniform synchronization in multi-agent systems with switching topologies,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1888–1901, 2016.

C. D. Cruz-Ancona, R. Martínez-Guerra, and C. A. Pérez-Pinacho, “Generalized multi-synchronization: a leader-following consensus problem of multi-agent systems,” Neurocomputing, vol. 233, pp. 52–60, 2017.

J. Xi, C. Wang, H. Liu, and Z. Wang, “Dynamic output feedback guaranteed-cost synchronization for multiagent networks with given cost budgets,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 28923–28935, 2018.

Z. Y. Tan, N. Cai, J. Zhou, and S. G. Zhang, “On performance of peer review for academic journals: analysis based on distributed parallel system,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, no. 99, pp. 19024–19032, 2019.

X. Liu and Z. Ji, “Controllability of multiagent systems based on path and cycle graphs,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 296–309, 2018.

Z. Ji and H. Yu, “A new perspective to graphical characterization of multi-agent controllability,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1471–1483, 2017.

H. Ma, X. Jia, N. Cai, and J. Xi, “Adaptive guaranteed-performance consensus control for multiagent systems with an adjustable convergence speed,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2019, Article ID 5190301, 9 pages, 2019.

M. Sabatini, G. B. Palmerini, and P. Gasbarri, “Control laws for defective swarming systems,” Advances in Astronautical Sciences, vol. 153, pp. 749–768, 2015.

K. Chen, S. Zhao, and N. Lv, “Network monitoring information collection in the SDN-enabled airborne tactical network,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 1940842, 20 pages, 2018.

M. Carpentiero, L. Gugliermetti, M. Sabatini, and G. B. Palmerini, “A swarm of wheeled and aerial robots for environmental monitoring,” in 2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC), pp. 90–95, Calabria, Italy, May 2017.

S. Wang and J. Huang, “Adaptive leader-following consensus for multiple Euler–Lagrange systems with an uncertain leader system,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 2188–2196, 2019.

X. Deng, X. Sun, R. Liu, and S. Liu, “Consensus control of time-varying delayed multiagent systems with high-order iterative learning control,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2018, Article ID 4865745, 12 pages, 2018.

J. Xi, Z. Fan, H. Liu, and T. Zheng, “Guaranteed-cost consensus for multiagent networks with Lipschitz nonlinear dynamics and switching topologies,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2841–2852, 2018.

Y. P. Tian and C. L. Liu, “Consensus of multi-agent systems with diverse input and communication delays,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2122–2128, 2008.

W. Zhu and D. Cheng, “Leader-following consensus of second-order agents with multiple time-varying delays,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1994–1999, 2010.

J. Xi, M. He, H. Liu, and J. Zheng, “Admissible output consensualization control for singular multi-agent systems with time delays,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 4074–4090, 2016.

H. Zhao, J. H. Park, Y. Zhang, and H. Shen, “Distributed output feedback consensus of discrete-time multi-agent systems,” Neurocomputing, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 86–91, 2014.

X. Liu, C. Du, P. Lu, and D. Yang, “Distributed event-triggered feedback consensus control with state-dependent threshold for general linear multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 2589–2609, 2017.

Y. Lv, Z. Li, Z. Duan, and G. Feng, “Novel distributed robust adaptive consensus protocols for linear multi-agent systems with directed graphs and external disturbances,” International Journal of Control, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 137–147, 2017.

L. Cheng, H. Wang, Z. G. Hou, and M. Tan, “Reaching a consensus in networks of high-order integral agents under switching directed topologies,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1966–1981, 2016.

G. Zhang, J. Xu, J. Zeng, J. Xi, and W. Tang, “Consensus of high-order discrete-time linear networked multi-agent systems with switching topology and time delays,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1182–1194, 2017.

J. Xi, C. Wang, H. Liu, and L. Wang, “Completely distributed guaranteed-performance consensualization for high-order multiagent systems with switching topologies,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1338–1348, 2019.

P. Lin, Y. Jia, and L. Li, “Distributed robust consensus control in directed networks of agents with time-delay,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 643–653, 2008.

W. Huang, W. Zheng, and L. Mo, “Distributed robust H∞ composite-rotating consensus of second-order multi-agent systems,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 13, no. 7, 2017.

L. Sheng, Z. Wang, and L. Zou, “Output-feedback H₂/H∞ consensus control for stochastic time-varying multi-agent systems with (x,u,v)-dependent noises,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 107, pp. 58–67, 2017.

Y. Liu and Y. Jia, “Robust H∞ consensus control of uncertain multi-agent systems with time delays,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1086–1094, 2011.

Z. X. Li and H. B. Ji, “Robust delay-dependent H∞ consensus control for multi-agent systems with input delays,” Acta Automatica Sinica, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2556–2562, 2014.

X. Wang and G. H. Yang, “Distributed reliable H∞ consensus control for a class of multi-agent systems under switching networks: a topology-based average dwell time approach,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 2767–2787, 2016.

H. Rezaee and F. Abdollahi, “Decentralized H∞ consensus protocol for a class of high-order multiagent systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 26, no. 15, pp. 3330–3343, 2016.

D. Zhang, Z. Xu, Q. G. Wang, and Y. B. Zhao, “Leader-follower H∞ consensus of linear multi-agent systems with aperiodic sampling and switching connected topologies,” ISA Transactions, vol. 68, pp. 150–159, 2017.

G. E. Dullerud and F. Paganini, A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach, vol. 36, Springer, Berlin, 2013.

J. A. Fax and R. M. Murray, “Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1465–1476, 2004.

M. Wu, Y. He, J. H. She, and G. P. Liu, “Delay-dependent criteria for robust stability of time-varying delay systems,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1435–1439, 2004.

L. XIE, “Output feedback H∞ control of systems with parameter uncertainty,” International Journal of Control, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 741–750, 1996.

E. E. Yaz, “Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 2473-2474, 1998.

L. El Ghaoui, F. Oustry, and M. AitRami, “A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1171–1176, 1997.