International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 801638, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/801638

Research Article

A Novel Miniaturized Dual Slant-Polarized UWB Antenna Array with Excellent Pattern Symmetry Property for MIMO Applications

Zhi Zeng,¹ Jianjun Huang,² Zhaohui Song,³ and Qinyu Zhang¹

¹Shenzhen Graduate School, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
²MOBI Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518057, China
³Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Received 30 June 2014; Accepted 4 September 2014

Academic Editor: Wenhua Chen

Copyright © 2015 Zhi Zeng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A novel miniaturized 1 × 10 uniform linear dual slant-polarized UWB antenna array for MIMO base station is presented. The antenna array operates in the frequency band from 1710 to 2690 MHz with a 17.3–18.7 dBi gain in a size of 105 × 1100 × 37 mm. The array element is composed of two single-polarized dipoles evolved from bow-tie antenna with slots on them, which miniaturize the size of the antenna. The 10 array elements are fed through an air dielectric strip-line power splitter. Two parameters, the beam tracking and the beam squint, are presented to quantitatively describe the pattern symmetry property of the antenna. The simulated and measured radiation performances are studied and compared. The results show that the pattern symmetry property of the single antenna element has been improved about 24% compared with the former study, and the antenna array also provides excellent pattern symmetry property.

1. Introduction

Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) is the use of multiple antennas at both the transmitter and the receiver to improve communication performance [1]. MIMO has attracted attention in wireless communications, because it offers significant increases in data throughput and link range without additional bandwidth or increased transmit power [2]. It achieves this goal by spreading the same total transmit power over the antennas to achieve an array gain that improves the spectral efficiency and/or to achieve a diversity gain that improves the link reliability (reduced fading) [3]. Because of these advantages, MIMO is an important part of modern wireless communication standards such as IEEE 802.11n (WI-Fi), 4G, 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE), WiMAX, and HSPA+ [4]. While coding and signal processing are key elements to successful implementation of a MIMO system, the propagation channel and the antenna design represent major parameters that ultimately impact the system performance. As a result, considerable research has been devoted recently to these two areas. For example, assessing the potential of MIMO systems requires a new level of understanding concerning multipath channel characteristics. Furthermore, while we have extensive information concerning the behavior of an antenna in multipath channels [5], recent activity surrounding MIMO communications has exposed new issues related to the impact of antenna properties and the array configuration on the system performance. In [6], a simulation study of the channel capacity of a MIMO antenna system exploiting multiple polarizations was carried out, while in [7] Perez and Ibanez analyzed the capacity of MIMO systems based on dual-polarized antenna array.

In modern mobile telecommunications industry, dual slant-polarized (+45°/−45°) base station antennas are widely used for their good anti-multi-path property. Usually, in a 2G network, a dual slant-polarized base station antenna works in 1T2R mode (1 of the 2 channels for transmitting, both 2 channels for receiving). In 3G or LTE network, both 2 channels of the dual slant-polarized base station antenna might be used to transmit and receive the signal. In this case, highly symmetric radiation patterns are required to the dual slant-polarized base station antenna. However, only a few studies about the radiation pattern symmetry of the antenna were carried out in the past. In [8], Chair et al. studied 4 different types of dual-polarized dielectric resonator antennas and analyzed their radiation pattern symmetry qualitatively. In [9], Gao et al. presented a CPW-fed dual-polarized dielectric resonator antenna with “almost symmetrical” radiation patterns. In [10], Mak and Rowell presented a dual-polarized patch antenna with symmetrical patterns for base station in 1710–2690 MHz, but they did not analyze the pattern symmetry quantitatively either. In [11] Kim et al. proposed a modified dual-polarization horn antenna to improve radiation pattern symmetry and presented a method to evaluate the radiation pattern symmetry. They quantitatively analyzed the radiation pattern symmetry by comparing the normalized radiation pattern level of the E/H-plane at some specified angles including the −10 dB beam width point. The smaller the differences, the better the radiation pattern symmetry. Both the simulated and measured results have shown that the radiation pattern level differences increase as the angle increases within the −10 dB beam width range, so the difference at −10 dB beam width point can be considered as a characteristic to describe the radiation pattern symmetry. In this paper, it is called the beam tracking, which is defined as the maximum level difference between the two orthogonal polarizations normalized radiation patterns at the 10 dB beam width point, as shown in Figure 1. The beam tracking can be expressed as

where is the level of −45° polarization at the 10 dB point on the left, is the level of +45° polarization at the 10 dB point on the left, is the level of −45° polarization at the 10 dB point on the right, and is the level of +45° polarization at the 10 dB point on the right. The smaller the beam tracking is, the better the symmetry of the radiation pattern is. Ideally, the value of beam tracking is expected to be 0, which means that the two patterns coincide completely at the 10 dB point. In [11], the authors supposed that the boresight was the axis of symmetry of the antenna. However, for most antennas, the boresight is not the symmetry axis of the antenna, because the beam is always tilted to one side, more or less. In this case only the amplitude is not enough to describe the radiation pattern symmetry, but also the angular dimension, the beam squint. The beam squint is defined as the ratio of the boresight angle to the 10 dB beam width;

Ideally, the value of beam squint is expected to be 0, which means that the boresight is just the symmetry axis of the antenna. The beam tracking and the beam squint describe the symmetric property of the dual-polarized antenna in the amplitude domain and the angular domain, respectively.

Figure 1: Antenna beam tracking and antenna beam squint.

In this paper, a novel compact 1 × 10 dual slant-polarized antenna array with excellent pattern symmetry property is presented. The proposed antenna array operates in the frequency band from 1710 to 2690 MHz, with a size of 105 × 1300 × 37 mm. The fractional bandwidth of the antenna array is 44.5%, which could be classified as ultra wideband (UWB) antenna according to the definition of UWB antenna by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Telecommunication Union Radio (ITU-R) [12]. The simulations of the proposed antenna are performed using the commercial electromagnetic simulation software HFSS. In the whole range of 10 dB beam width, the worst beam tracking of the array element is 0.40 dB, which has been improved about 24% compared with the result as 0.5398 dB in [11]. And the beam squint values are better than 1%. The antenna array also provides excellent pattern symmetry property. A prototype of the proposed antenna array was fabricated and measured in an anechoic chamber. The experimental measurements concerning the antenna parameters are found to be in good agreement with the numerical results.

2. Antenna Array Structure and Design

2.1. Antenna Array Element

The pattern symmetry property of the antenna array is mainly decided by the properties of the array element, so the design of the array element is quite important. The geometry of the proposed antenna array element is shown in Figure 2. The dual slant-polarized array element is composed of 2 evolved bow-tie antennas on a 105 mm wide reflector, and the total height is 37 mm. The evolutionary process from bow-tie antenna to the proposed array element is shown in Figure 3. The bow-tie antenna is a kind of antenna with two flaring, triangular shaped arms, which is a typical wide band antenna [13]. By adding slot on the arms, the equivalent electrical length of the arms is increased, so as to miniaturize the dimensions of the antenna. The array element has a strictly symmetrical structure, which is expected to obtain good radiation symmetry property. The feeding structure of the array element is shown in Figure 4. By adjusting the shape and the dimensions of the inner conductor, the antenna can be matched to 50 Ω transmission lines in a bandwidth of 1710 MHz–2690 MHz. Besides that, there are some holes in the arms and some raised blocks at the edge of the arms, which are brought in to tune the return loss over the whole frequency band.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: The geometry of the array element: (a) 3D view, (b) top view, (c) and side view.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: The evolution from bow-tie antenna to the proposed array element: (a) bow-tie antenna, (b) bow-tie antenna with slots, (c) bow-tie antenna with slots and holes, and (d) the proposed array element.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: The feeding structure of the dipole: (a) 3D view, (b) the feeding structure for −45°, and (c) the feeding structure for +45°.

2.2. Antenna Array

Based on the array element above, a uniform linear antenna array is designed. The proposed antenna array is composed of 10 elements, and the spacing between the elements was set to 110 mm based on the frequency characteristic. The structure of the antenna array is shown in Figure 5. The antenna array is fed by two 1 to 10 air dielectric strip-line power splitters, which are connected with the 10 elements through several coaxial cables as shown in Figure 6. The air dielectric strip-line has quite low transmission loss, which contributes to the gain of the antenna. The amplitude of each dipole could be conveniently adjusted by adjusting the impedance of the corresponding matching section, and the phase of each dipole could be adjusted by adjusting the corresponding cable length. The dimensions of the antenna array are 105 × 1100 × 37 mm.

Figure 5: The structure of the antenna array.

Figure 6: The feeding structure of the antenna array.

3. Antenna Array Simulation and Measurement

A commercial electromagnetic simulation software HFSS is used to analyze the performance of the proposed antenna element and the antenna array. The weight of the amplitude and the phase of each element were optimized to achieve a low upper side lobe level, which is quite critical for a wireless telecommunication system base station. The antenna array has around 65 degrees beam-width in H-plane, which is quite suitable for base station of mobile communication. The beam tracking and the beam squint of the array element and the antenna array are calculated in E-plane and H-plane. The simulated results of the beam tracking are shown in Table 1. The simulated beam squint results of the array element and the antenna array are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The simulated results show that both the proposed antenna element and the antenna array have quite good pattern symmetry property.

Table 1: The simulated beam tracking computed in H-plane and E-plane.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

Element beam tracking (dB)
Array beam tracking (dB)
Element beam tracking (dB)
Array beam tracking (dB)

1710
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.06

2200
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.07

2690
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.10

Table 2: The simulated beam squint of the array element.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

−45°
+45°
−45°
+45°

1710
0.35%
0.30%
0.38%
0.34%

2200
0.48%
0.53%
0.49%
0.57%

2690
0.53%
0.58%
0.60%
0.58%

Table 3: The simulated beam squint of the antenna array.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

−45°
+45°
−45°
+45°

1710
0.35%
0.32%
0.39%
0.34%

2200
0.50%
0.55%
0.49%
0.58%

2690
0.56%
0.59%
0.61%
0.60%

A prototype of the proposed antenna array was fabricated for measurement. The array elements were made of aluminum for its good processing property and coated with Tin to prevent the surface oxidation. The picture of the proposed antenna array prototype is shown in Figure 7, while the numerical and measurement results concerning the frequency behavior of the parameters of the antenna are reported in Figure 8.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 7: The photo of the proposed antenna array: (a) top view of the array element, (b) side view of the array element, and (c) the proposed antenna array.

(a)

(b)

Figure 8: The simulated and measured parameters of the proposed antenna array: (a) and and (b) .

The measurement of radiation patterns was carried out in an enclosed anechoic chamber. The simulated and the measured radiation patterns in H-plane and E-plane are shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 9: The simulated and measured radiation patterns in H-plane: (a) 1710 MHz −45°, (b) 1710 MHz +45°, (c) 2200 MHz −45°, (d) 22000 MHz +45°, (e) 2690 MHz −45°, and (f) 2690 MHz +45°.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 10: The simulated and measured radiation patterns in E-plane: (a) 1710 MHz −45°, (b) 1710 MHz +45°, (c) 2200 MHz −45°, (d) 22000 MHz +45°, (e) 2690 MHz −45°, and (f) 2690 MHz +45°.

The simulated and the measured gain curves of the proposed antenna array are shown in Figure 11. However, the measured gain data of the antenna is approximately 0.1 dB below the predicted values in the operation frequency band. The reason for this behavior is probably coupling within the cable loss and/or the nonideal power distribution of the power dividers.

Figure 11: The gain of the proposed antenna array.

The beam tracking and the beam squint of the array element and antenna array are measured in E-plane and H-plane; the measured results of the beam tracking are shown in Table 4. The measured beam squint results of the array element and the antenna array are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. The measured array element beam tracking results are better than 0.40 dB, which is about 24% better than the results as 0.5398 dB in [11]. And the measured antenna array beam tracking results are better than 0.41 dB. Besides that, all the measured results of the beam squint are better than 1%. The measured data agree very well with the numerical results and show attractive pattern symmetry characteristics for a MIMO base station.

Table 4: The measured beam tracking computed in H-plane and E-plane.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

Element beam tracking (dB)
Array beam tracking (dB)
Element beam tracking (dB)
Array beam tracking (dB)

1710
0.26
0.26
0.27
0.28

2200
0.36
0.36
0.37
0.37

2690
0.40
0.41
0.40
0.40

Table 5: The measured beam squint of the array element.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

−45°
+45°
−45°
+45°

1710
0.80%
0.74%
0.58%
0.55%

2200
0.65%
0.63%
0.70%
0.67%

2690
0.52%
0.47%
0.56%
0.53%

Table 6: The measured beam squint of the antenna array.

Freq. (MHz)
H-plane
E-plane

−45°
+45°
−45°
+45°

1710
0.82%
0.75%
0.69%
0.54%

2200
0.71%
0.69%
0.72%
0.73%

2690
0.66%
0.51%
0.60%
0.61%

4. Conclusion

In this paper, a novel compact 1 × 10 dual slant-polarized antenna array with excellent pattern symmetry property has been proposed. The antenna array is composed of 10 dual slant-polarized antenna array elements, which evolved from the bow-tie antennas. The antenna array operates in the frequency band 1710–2690 MHz, with a size of  mm only. Two parameters, the beam tracking and the beam squint, that quantitatively describe the pattern symmetry, were presented. The results show that the pattern symmetry property of the single antenna element has been improved about 24% compared with the former study, and the antenna array also provides excellent pattern symmetry property.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to MOBI Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Company for providing the software package of HFSS and antenna test chamber. This work was supported in part by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61032003 and the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant 2009CB320402.

References

J. F. Valenzuela-Valdés, M. A. García-Fernández, A. M. Martínez-González, and D. A. Sánchez-Hernández, “Evaluation of true polarization diversity for MIMO systems,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2746–2755, 2009.

P.-S. Kildal and K. Rosengren, “Correlation and capacity of MIMO systems and mutual coupling, radiation efficiency, and diversity gain of their antennas: simulations and measurements in a reverberation chamber,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 104–112, 2004.

K. S. Min, D. J. Kim, and M. S. Kim, “Multi-channel MIMO antenna design for WiBro/PCS band,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation Society, pp. 1225–1228, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 2007.

M. A. Jensen and J. W. Wallace, “A review of antennas and propagation for MIMO wireless communications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2810–2824, 2004.

J. Lee and N. Jindal, “Symmetrie capacity of MIMO downlink channels,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT '06), pp. 1031–1035, Seattle, Wash, USA, July 2006.

L. Dong, H. Choo, R. W. Heath Jr., and H. Ling, “Simulation of MIMO channel capacity with antenna polarization diversity,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1869–1873, 2005.

J. Pérez, J. Ibáñez, L. Vielva, and I. Santamaría, “Capacity estimation of polarization-diversity MIMO systems in Urban microcellular environments,” in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC '04), vol. 4, pp. 2730–2734, September 2004.

R. Chair, A. A. Kishk, and K. F. Lee, “Comparative study on different feeding techniques for dual polarized dielectric resonator antennas,” in IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 2495–2498, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2006.

Y. Gao, Z. Feng, and L. Zhang, “Compact CPW-fed dielectric resonator antenna with dual polarization,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 544–547, 2011.

A. C. K. Mak and C. Rowell, “A low-cost dual-polarized wideband antenna,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation Society, pp. 1478–1479, Orlando, Fla, USA, July 2013.

J. S. Kim, J. H. Yoon, Y. J. Yoon, W.-S. Lee, and C.-G. Kim, “Design of modified dual mode horn antenna to improve E/H-plane radiation pattern symmetry,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (ISAP '12), pp. 547–550, Nagoys, Japan, November 2012.

F. Gross, Frontiers in Antennas: Next Generation Design & Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2011.

E. A. Soliman, S. Brebels, P. Delmotte, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, and E. Beyne, “Bow-tie slot antenna fed by CPW,” Electronics Letters, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 514–515, 1999.