International Journal of Endocrinology

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 372060, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372060

Clinical Study

Reduced Seminal Concentration of CD45pos Cells after Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Treatment in Selected Patients with Idiopathic Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia

Rosita A. Condorelli,¹ Aldo E. Calogero,¹ Enzo Vicari,¹ Laura Mongioi’,¹ Giovanni Burgio,¹ Rossella Cannarella,¹ Filippo Giacone,¹ Linda Iacoviello,¹ Giuseppe Morgia,² Vincenzo Favilla,² Sebastiano Cimino,² and Sandro La Vignera¹

¹Department of Medical and Pediatric Sciences, Section of Endocrinology, Andrology and Internal Medicine, University of Catania, Policlinico “G. Rodolico”, Building 4, Rm 2C18, Via S. Sofia 78, 95123 Catania, Italy

²Department of Urology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

Received 11 September 2013; Revised 20 November 2013; Accepted 20 November 2013; Published 14 January 2014

Academic Editor: Muhammad Shahab

Copyright © 2014 Rosita A. Condorelli et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The present study evaluated the conventional sperm parameters and the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells (pan-leukocyte marker) of infertile patients with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT). The patients were arbitrarily divided into three groups treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone FSH: α (Group A = 20 patients), recombinant FSH-β (Group B = 20 patients), and highly purified human FSH (Group C = 14 patients). All treated groups achieved a similar improvement of the main sperm parameters (density, progressive motility, and morphology), but only the increase in the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology was significant compared to the baseline in all three examined groups. Moreover, all groups had a significant reduction of the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells and of the percentage of immature germ cells. Before and after the treatment, the concentration of CD45pos cells showed a positive linear correlation with the percentage of immature germ cells and a negative correlation with the percentage of spermatozoa with regular morphology. These results demonstrate that treatment with FSH is effective in patients with idiopathic OAT and that there are no significant differences between the different preparations. The novelty of this study is in the significant reduction of the concentration of CD45pos cells observed after the treatment.

1. Introduction

Follicle-stimulating hormone has an important role in testicular function. In particular, its main biological actions (mediated through a receptor system present on the Sertoli cells) are the following: cellular sperm differentiation, modulation of spermatid morphogenesis, and the maturation of epididymal spermatozoa [1–10].

The biological actions of FSH are more relevant in the clinical condition of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism [5, 11–16] and are more controversial in functional hypogonadism and/or in patients with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) [17–27]. Functional hypogonadism is defined as a clinical condition in which the gonadotropin levels are in the low-normal range but the testosterone level is inadequate (or often in the low-normal range) [28]. Idiopathic OAT means that no etiological factor can be found by common clinical, instrumental, or laboratory methods [29].

The demonstrated biological effects of FSH treatment in male infertile patients are increased spermatogonial population and sperm count, [17–21], increased rate of fertilization, and increased pregnancy rate in programs of assisted fertilization [22–24]. However, several studies show a lack of effects of FSH on sperm parameters [25–27].

The Italian Medicines Agency authorizes the use of preparations of FSH for the treatment of male infertility in males with hypogonadism and in infertile males with low or normal levels of FSH, but not more than 8 mIU/mL in any case.

There are, however, lesser known aspects relating to the possible usefulness of FSH therapy with FSH on unconventional as well as conventional sperm parameters (density, morphology, and motility). For example, FSH therapy could induce modifications that could restore the quality of the inflammatory response of the semen. Under particular conditions, the leukocyte concentration in semen is directly correlated with immature germ cell concentrations and the percentage of abnormal forms [30]. The defects of spermatogenesis represent a potential target of hormonal treatment as well as a potential cause of increased inflammatory response, in particular the response of leukocytes, the main mediators of this phenomenon. Together with their classic antimicrobial action, leukocytes also remove immature germ cells and/or sperm with maturational defects [31–33], suggesting they have a protective role in semen at concentrations of <1 million/mL [34]. However, the complete characterization of the leukocytes requires the identification of the specific populations (polymorphonuclear granulocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes) [35, 36] that reflect more accurately the possible chronicization of the inflammatory process (in particular the increase in lymphocytes). The failure to characterize specific populations of leukocytes may explain the frequent underestimation of the inflammatory process in the semen of patients with idiopathic OAT, because only polymorphonuclear granulocytes are reported in routine practice [37]. Finally in clinical practice, leukospermia and bacteriospermia frequently are not associated [33], and often the clinical andrologist must reduce the negative effects on spermatozoa caused by the mere presence of leukocytes, which are not improved only with anti-inflammatory treatment [38]. From the technical point of view, flow cytometry is able to discriminate (with the use of monoclonal antibodies) the different subpopulations of leukocytes [39, 40].

In this context, the aims of this study were the following.

(a)To evaluate the quality of the conventional sperm parameters (density, morphology, and progressive motility) in infertile patients with idiopathic OAT after treatment with three different preparations of follicle-stimulating hormone: recombinant FSH- and - (Gonal F, Puregon) and highly purified human FSH (Fostimon).(b)To evaluate in these patients the semen concentration of CD45pos cells (a pan-leukocytemarker) before and after hormonal treatment with one of the three different hormonal preparations.

2. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patient clinical, instrumental, and laboratory data obtained from June 2012 to June 2013. All patients enrolled in this study were referred to the Department of Andrology and Endocrinology of Catania University, Italy, for the diagnosis and treatment of male infertility. Overall, the data of 316 patients were analyzed. The men were 18–40 years old, with a mean age of years and a body mass index (BMI) ranging between 18.0 and 27.0 kg/m² (mean BMI,  kg/m²).

2.1. Exclusion Criteria

(1) Primary Scrotal Disease. Varicocele, hydrocele, testicular focal injury/injuries, testicular microlithiasis, inhomogeneous testicular echotexture (ultrasound examination), and abnormal hemodynamic parameters of the testis (altered values of systolic peak velocity and resistance index) via ultrasound examination.

(2) Other Criteria. Genetic disorders (altered karyotype and/or the presence of Y chromosome microdeletions), clinical history of cryptorchidism, varicocelectomy, eversion of the tunica vaginalis, head trauma, endocrine abnormalities (increased gonadotropins, reduced serum total testosterone (<2.8 ng mL⁻¹), hyperprolactinemia, and increased estrogen concentrations), systemic diseases (kidney disease, liver disease, and diabetes mellitus), cigarette smoking, alcohol use, concomitant use of other drugs during the previous 6 months, leukocytospermia (leukocyte concentration in semen > 1 million/mL (detected with the peroxidase test)), male accessory gland inflammatory disease, positive seminal, urine and/or urethral swab cultures, and ultrasound signs of epididymal obstruction.

Applying these exclusion criteria, we analyzed data from 54 patients with an age range of 18–33 years (mean years) and a BMI of 19.0–26.0 kg/m² (mean  kg/m²).

The protocol was approved by the internal Institutional Review Board, and informed written consent was obtained from each participant.

2.2. Scrotal Ultrasound Evaluation

The scrotal ultrasound evaluation was performed in two phases: the first with the patient in a supine position (with the penis resting on the suprapubic region) and the second in an upright position to evaluate reflux along the pampiniform plexus, testicular pain, testicular malposition, and the extent of any fluid collection. The examination was performed with a GX Megas Esaote (Esaote SpA—Genova (Italy)) device, equipped with linear, high-resolution, and high-frequency (7.5 to 14 MHz) probes dedicated to the study of soft body areas, with color Doppler for detecting slow flow and a scanning surface of at least 5 cm. Testicular volume was calculated automatically by the ultrasound machine using the ellipsoid formula (length width thickness 0.52). The testis was considered normal in size when it had a volume between 15 and 25 cm³, low-normal when it had a volume between 10 and 12 cm³, and hypotrophic when it had a volume of less than 10 cm³ [41, 42]. The parenchymal echostructure was considered normal in the presence of thin, densely packed, and homogeneously deployed echoes. The presence of a finely inhomogeneous echopattern and weakly hypo- or hyperechogenic areas was considered indicative of primary testicular disease. During the Doppler evaluation, flow was detected at the level of the spermatic artery and the testicular artery and their branches. The velocity analysis was considered normal in the presence of low resistance, a prolonged systolic phase, flow maintenance during diastole, and a low resistance index (IR: 0.62). Systolic flow speed along the centripetal arteries was considered normal if it was lower than 15 cm/sec and/or between 4 and 12 cm/sec [41–43].

2.3. Hormone Measurements

Hormonal evaluations were performed by electrochemiluminescence with Hitachi-Roche equipment (Cobas 6000, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The reference intervals were as follows: LH = 1.6–9.0 mIU mL⁻¹, FSH = 2.0–12.0 mIU mL⁻¹, 17-estradiol = 8.0–43.0 pg mL⁻¹, total testosterone = 2.8–8.0 ng mL⁻¹, and prolactin = 4.0–15.0 ng mL⁻¹. Blood sampling was performed at 8:00 am, after at least 8 hours of sleep. The determination of serum LH and prolactin was repeated after an interval of 30 minutes.

2.4. Sperm Analysis

Semen samples were collected by masturbation into a sterile container after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence and were transported to the laboratory within 30 minutes after ejaculation. According to the 2010 WHO guidelines, each sample was evaluated for seminal volume, pH, sperm count, progressive motility, morphology, and round cell concentration [37]. For all patients, the sperm analysis was repeated after 4 months, at the end of the hormonal treatment.

2.5. Conventional Measurement of Seminal Leukocytes and Immature Germ Cells

2.5.1. Seminal Leukocytes (Peroxidase Test)

The protocol used was adapted from that of Endtz [44]. The working solution used for the test was obtained by adding 1 L of H₂O₂ to 20 L of a 0.09% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride stock solution (DAB, ISOPAC, Sigma, Milan, Italy) in 40% ethanol. In each assay, 20 L of semen was incubated with 20 L of working solution in an Eppendorf tube for 5 minutes at room temperature. Before setting up the slide, 40 L of PBS was added. Peroxidase-positive cells were marked by yellow-brown-red staining, while peroxidase-negative cells remained colorless. At least 100 round cells were counted using an optical microscope at 400x magnification, and the percentages of peroxidase-positive and -negative cells were evaluated. The total leukocyte count is expressed in millions per milliliter of semen.

2.5.2. Immature Germ Cell Evaluation in Semen

Spermatids were differentiated from leukocytes by a seminal fluid smear stained using the Papanicolaou technique [45]. Spermatids were identified on the basis of the following parameters: coloration, size, core shape and size (approximately 5 M), absence of intracellular peroxidase, and the absence of leukocyte-specific antigen (see Section 2.6). Morphologically, multinucleated spermatids were distinguished from polymorphonuclear leukocytes by the presence of a pink color in contrast to the bluish color of polymorphonuclear leukocytes.

2.6. Cytofluorimetric Assessment

The analysis was conducted with an EPICS XL Flow Cytometer (Coulter Electronics, IL, USA), equipped with an argon laser at 488 nm and three fluorescence detectors: green (FL-1 at 525 nm), orange (FL-2 to 575 nm), and red (FL-3 at 620 nm). For each sample, 100,000 events were measured at a low flow velocity and analyzed using System II, version 3.0.

2.6.1. Flow-Cytometric Analysis of CD45pos Cells

To perform the absolute lymphocyte count, 100 L of each liquefied semen sample was incubated with a mixture containing Syto-16 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain to identify the spermatozoa and exclude debris (final concentration 200 nM) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oregon, USA), 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD, Via-Probe, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) to assess viability, anti-CD45-APC (pan-leukocyte antigen) to recognize white blood cells, and anti-CD16-PE to PMN recognize. The addition of 100 L of Flow-Count Fluorospheres (Beckmann-Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) at 1034 beads/mL allowed us to determine the absolute lymphocyte count by flow cytometry. After incubation in the dark for 20 minutes at room temperature, 1 mL of PBS was added, and the sample was analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). For each test, 100,000 events were acquired. The total number of leukocytes per milliliter was calculated by applying the following formula [39]:

2.7. Different Hormonal Treatments Analyzed

Sperm parameters of three different groups (arbitrarily assigned) before and after the treatment with different preparations of follicle-stimulating hormone were evaluated:

(i)Group A (20 patients) treated with recombinant FSH- (Gonal F; Merck Serono Europe);(ii)Group B ( patients) treated with recombinant FSH- (Puregon; Organon);(iii)Group C (14 patients) treated with highly purified human FSH (Fostimon; IBSA).

All patients were treated for 4 months (according to the period of treatment admitted from the current ministerial note (note 74)), with the following scheme of therapy: 150 units 3 times a week (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday), always injected subcutaneously. No patient received combination therapy with chorionic gonadotropin because no patient had a low concentration of total testosterone (exclusion criteria).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The results are reported as the mean ± SEM and percentage. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. A correlation analysis was conducted by evaluating the Pearson correlation coefficient to assess possible covariance linearity between CD45pos cells and the other examined parameters. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 9.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A value less than 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

3. Result

The three examined groups did not show statistically significant difference at baseline in the evaluated physical parameters (age, body mass index, and testicular volume) or hormonal parameters (FSH, LH, total testosterone, estradiol, and prolactin) (Table 1).

Table 1: Physical and hormonal characteristics at baseline of the three examined groups.

Parameters
Group A

( patients)
Group B

( patients)
Group C

( patients)

Physical parameters

Age (years)
25.0 ± 4.0
23.0 ± 3.0
23.5 ± 2.0

BMI (kg/m²)
23.5 ± 3.0
24.4 ± 2.5
23.6 ± 2.0

Testicular volume (cm³)
16.0 ± 7.0
15.5 ± 8.5
16.2 ± 6.6

Hormonal parameters

FSH (mIU mL⁻¹)
2.6 ± 1.1
2.8 ± 1.8
3.1 ± 4.6

LH (mIU mL⁻¹)
4.5 ± 3.3
5.2 ± 2.7
4.1 ± 2.2

Testosterone (ng mL⁻¹)
6.1 ± 5.1
6.4 ± 4.7
5.9 ± 4.2

Estradiol (pg mL⁻¹)
14.6 ± 12.0
18.4 ± 13.7
16.9 ± 7.8

Prolactin (ng mL⁻¹)
4.6 ± 4.7
8.9 ± 5.7
6.7 ± 4.2

The correlation analysis conducted on all patients before and after the treatment showed the presence of a positive linear correlation between the concentration of CD45pos cells in the semen and the percentage of spermatids and a negative correlation between the concentration of CD45pos cells and the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology (Table 2).

Table 2: Correlation analysis between semen concentrations of CD45pos cells and other sperm and hormonal parameters before and after treatment ( patients).

Parameter
CD45pos cells (before treatment)
CD45pos cells (after treatment)

Semen volume (mL)

Semen pH

Total sperm count (million)

Sperm density (million/mL)

Spermatozoa with normal morphology (%)

Spermatozoa with progressive motility (%)

Immature germ elements (%)

Peroxidase-positive leukocytes (million/mL)

Serum FSH (mIU mL⁻¹)

Serum LH (mIU mL⁻¹)

Serum total testosterone (ng mL⁻¹)

Serum estradiol (pg mL⁻¹)

Serum prolactin (ng mL⁻¹)

The three examined groups did not show statistically significant differences at baseline in the evaluated sperm parameters (density, morphology, progressive motility, percentage of spermatids, leukocyte concentration, and CD45pos cell concentrations) (Table 3).

Table 3: Sperm parameters of the three examined groups before and after the hormonal treatment.

Parameters
Group A

( patients)
Group B

( patients)
Group C

( patients)

Sperm parameters before treatment

Density (mil/mL)
6.6 ± 3.3
8.4 ± 5.7
7.7 ± 4.2

Normal forms (%)
2.2 ± 2.3
2.6 ± 1.3
1.9 ± 1.2

Progressive motility (%)
11.0 ± 6.0
14.0 ± 4.0
10.0 ± 7.0

Spermatids (%)
12.0 ± 6.0
14.0 ± 4.0
11.0 ± 4.0

Leukocytes (mil/mL)
0.4 ± 0.3
0.6 ± 0.3
0.3 ± 0.2

CD45pos cells (mil/mL)
1.8 ± 1.2
1.5 ± 1.4
1.7 ± 1.3

Sperm parameters after treatment

Density (mil/mL)
8.8 ± 4.2
10.8 ± 4.6
9.0 ± 3.0

Normal forms (%)
4.2 ± 2.8*
5.0 ± 1.7*
3.6 ± 1.6*

Progressive motility (%)
14.0 ± 8.0
19.0 ± 3.0
15.0 ± 6.0

Spermatids (%)
4.0 ± 2.0*
5.0 ± 3.0*
3.0 ± 2.0*

Leukocytes (mil/mL)
0.2 ± 0.2
0.4 ± 0.2
0.2 ± 0.3

CD45pos cells (mil/mL)
0.5 ± 0.2*
0.4 ± 0.3*
0.4 ± 0.2*

versus baseline.

After hormonal treatment, we did not detect a statistically significant difference between the examined groups in any of the investigated sperm parameters. However, within each group, the following sperm parameters showed statistically significant differences () compared to the baseline: percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology, percentage of spermatids, and concentration of CD45pos cells (Table 3).

Table 4 shows the percentage distribution of patients according to the different concentrations of CD45pos cells before and after therapy.

Table 4: The percentage distribution of patients according to the different concentrations of CD45pos cells before and after therapy.

CD45pos cells
Group A

( patients)
Group B

( patients)
Group C

( patients)

Before treatment

0.1–0.5 mil/mL
2 (10%)
2 (10%)
1 (7%)

0.5–1.0 mil/mL
3 (15%)
3 (15%)
2 (14%)

1.0–1.5 mil/mL
3 (15%)
5 (25%)
2 (14%)

1.5–2.0 mil/mL
8 (40%)*
7 (35%)*
7 (50%)*

2.0–2.5 mil/mL
2 (10%)
2 (10%)
1 (7%)

2.5–3.0 mil/mL
2 (10%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

After treatment

0.1–0.5 mil/mL
14 (70%)*
15 (75%)*
9 (64%)*

0.5–1.0 mil/mL
2 (10%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

1.0–1.5 mil/mL
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

1.5–2.0 mil/mL
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

2.0–2.5 mil/mL
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

2.5–3.0 mil/mL
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
1 (7%)

versus other concentrations.

Finally, the mean testicular volume in the three examined groups did not change significantly from before to after therapy (Group versus  cm³; Group versus  cm³; Group versus  cm³).

4. Discussion

The results of this study show that a group of selected patients with idiopathic OAT had a significant improvement of the percentage of spermatozoa with regular morphology after pharmacological treatment with FSH for 4 months. The patients treated with different formulations of FSH (recombinant FSH- and - and recombinant purified human FSH) after therapy showed similar improvements of this parameter. In the three examined groups, we observed a significant reduction of the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells and of the percentage of immature germ cells (spermatids) after the pharmacological treatment. The seminal concentration of CD45pos cells before and after treatment showed a positive linear correlation with the percentage of spermatids and a negative correlation with the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology. On the basis of these results, we think further studies should examine the frequency of increased concentration of seminal CD45pos cells in infertile patients with idiopathic OAT because this parameter is not routinely assessed in practice [37].

Other studies have examined the quality of conventional sperm parameters after pharmacological treatment with FSH in patients with idiopathic infertility, with discordant results [46].

In the placebo-controlled study of Kamischke and colleagues [26], 34 patients were treated with 150 IU rh-FSH on alternate days for 3 months, and 33 patients received placebo (30 mg saccharose). After the treatment, they observed a significant increase of testicular volume in patients receiving FSH, but they did not find any significant modification of conventional sperm parameters. Caroppo and colleagues [20] confirmed the increase of testicular volume in patients treated with FSH. Other studies, in accordance with Kamischke and colleagues, observed an absence of significant effects of this treatment on the conventional sperm parameters [22, 27, 47–50].

Significant increases in sperm concentration, motility, and morphology were reported in oligoasthenozoospermic patients receiving high p-FSH (150 IU p-FSH every day for 3 months), but not low p-FSH (150 IU p-FSH on alternate days for 3 months), in another study conducted by Iacono and colleagues [17]. Similarly, Paradisi et al. [51] showed that oligoasthenozoospermic patients benefitted from the administration of a high dosage of rh-FSH (300 IU on alternate days for 4 months). Their results agreed with other studies reporting the ability of this hormone to quantitatively improve spermatogenesis in mammals [52, 53].

Foresta and colleagues found, after 3 months of treatment with hp-FSH (75 IU, on alternate days), increased spermatogonial cell population. The authors subdivided the cohort of patients into responders (normal serum FSH and isolated hypospermatogenesis) and nonresponders (hypospermatogenesis associated with abnormal spermatogenetic maturation) [19, 54]. Two recent studies confirmed that the administration of either rh-FSH (150 IU on alternate days for 3 months) or hp-FSH (150 IU on alternate days for 3 months) significantly improved conventional sperm parameters [55, 56].

To our knowledge, this is the first study that has demonstrated a significant reduction in the concentration of CD45pos cells in the semen of infertile patients with idiopathic OAT. How should this result be interpreted?

Leukocytes are detectable in the male reproductive tract and in the seminal fluid [57]; under physiological conditions, they represent approximately 5% of the round cells in these locations [58]. The three subtypes of leukocytes are present in different quantities in the ejaculate. Particularly, polymorphonuclear granulocytes represent 50–60% of the leukocytes, macrophages represent 20–30%, and T lymphocytes represent approximatively 5% [35, 59]. According to the WHO, a concentration of leukocytes in the ejaculate exceeding 10⁶/mL as assessed by the peroxidase test defines a condition known as leukocytospermia.

The clinical significance of this condition in the pathogenesis of male infertility is still controversial [30, 60, 61]. In fact, leukocytospermia is frequently not associated with a microbiologically provable genitourinary infection [33]. In these cases it has been suggested that white blood cells originate from the epididymis and appear to have favorable effects on semen quality, with an important role in immunosurveillance and in phagocytosis of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa [31, 62, 63] or apoptosis [39].

In the present study, the patients were carefully selected. In particular, the exclusion criteria included the absence of leukocytospermia, the absence of MAGI, and the absence of urogenital infection detected through bacterial culture. The same patients after hormonal treatment showed a significant reduction in the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells and a significant improvement of conventional sperm parameters. Moreover, before the treatment, the seminal concentration of CD45pos cells was correlated with the percentage of spermatids and negatively correlated with the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology.

Most likely, the maintenance of a high concentration of CD45pos cells (there are poor data in the literature concerning the threshold value, but Politch and colleagues in 1993 suggested a threshold value of  WBC/mL [40]) is initially protective for spermatozoa, due to their suggested action of immunosurveillance for the maturational defects of the spermatozoa. However, no clinical studies have demonstrated whether the chronicization of this clinical model maintains these characteristics or is associated with the worsening of the sperm parameters. The results of this study suggest the latter hypothesis, but these data should be confirmed by further studies that evaluate other markers of inflammation and/or oxidative stress in the semen of infertile patients with high concentrations of CD45pos cells.

Theoretically, according to the data provided by transmission electron microscopy, the proportions of the main constituents of the nonsperm cellular components are the following: germinal elements (84%) (anucleate bodies = 43%; spermatids = 22.2%; cellular masses with anucleate organelles and spermatocytes = 18%), leukocytes (13%) (neutrophils = 12%; macrophages = 0.9%; lymphocytes = 0.1%), epithelial cells (2.3%), and Sertoli cells (0.7%) [59].

The prevalence of leukocytospermia in semen of infertile patients is between 10 and 20% [33, 35], while the presence of lymphocytes is detectable up to 20% [57]. Frequently, the concentration of leukocytes detected in the ejaculate is significantly higher with the immunocytological method than the traditional technique [40].

In most cases, chlamydia infections represent the main stimulus for the persistence of the inflammatory process in the urogenital tract [35]. However, bacteriospermia and leukocytospermia are not statistically associated with each other, and the presence of bacteriospermia alone is associated with sperm damage, but the presence of only leukocytes is also associated with deterioration of sperm parameters [33].

Leukocytes, in addition to their antimicrobial role, participate in the response to defects of sperm maturation. In particular, the concentration of CD45pos cells is reduced in semen samples that have defects in the morphology of the head of >50% of spermatozoa [31, 58]. Additionally, fragments of spermatozoa have been detected inside of cells with phagocytic activity [31]. Finally, semen samples with high concentrations of white blood cells contain a higher frequency of sperm with ideal morphology compared with samples with a high number of immature germ cells and a low concentration of leukocytes [63].

5. Limitations of the Study

This study has limitations that may explain some seemingly unfavorable results, such as the nonsignificant increase of sperm density and/or testicular volume after therapy. These limitations include the lack of data concerning the polymorphism of the FSH receptor, a factor known to be associated with different individual responses to therapy; the first evaluation of sperm parameters immediately after the end of therapy; and the lack of a control group. Future studies should examine these factors with a larger number of patients.

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that treatment with FSH has significant positive effects on sperm morphology in patients with idiopathic OAT. The three preparations seem to have similar effects on sperm morphology. The most novel finding is the reduction of CD45pos cells in the semen of infertile males. Future studies should clarify the importance of this diagnostic parameter in patients with idiopathic OAT and the significance of this result, in particular the relationships between CD45pos cells and spermatids and sperm morphology before and after hormonal treatment.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

E. Steinberg, “Hormonal control of mammalian spermiogenesis,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 5, pp. 1–72, 1971.

J. L. Courtens and M. Courot, “Acrosomal and nuclear morphogenesis in ram spermatids: an experimental study of hypophysectomized and testosterone-supplemented animals,” Anatomical Record, vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 1980.

A. M. Matsumoto, A. E. Karpas, C. A. Paulsen, and W. J. Bremner, “Reinitiation of sperm production in gonadotropin-suppressed normal men by administration of follicle-stimulating hormone,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1005–1015, 1983.

A. M. Matsumoto, C. A. Paulsen, and W. J. Bremner, “Stimulation of sperm production by human luteinizing hormone in gonadotropin-suppressed normal men,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 882–887, 1984.

A. M. Matsumoto, A. E. Karpas, and W. J. Bremner, “Chronic human chorionic gonadotropin administration in normal men: evidence that follicle-stimulating hormone is necessary for the maintenance of quantitatively normal spermatogenesis in man,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1184–1192, 1986.

M. M. A. van Alphen, H. J. G. van de Kant, and D. G. de Rooij, “Follicle-stimulating hormone stimulates spermatogenesis in the adult monkey,” Endocrinology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 1449–1455, 1988.

R. M. Sharpe, “Follicle-stimulating hormone and spermatogenesis in the adult male,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 405–407, 1989.

J. S. Tapanainen, K. Aittomäki, J. Min, T. Vaskivuo, and I. T. Huhtaniemi, “Men homozygous for an inactivating mutation of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) receptor gene present variable suppression of spermatogenesis and fertility,” Nature Genetics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 205–206, 1997.

E. Nieschlag, M. Simoni, J. Gromoll, and G. F. Weinbauer, “Role of FSH in the regulation of spermatogenesis: clinical aspects,” Clinical Endocrinology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 1999.

M. Simoni, G. F. Weinbauer, J. Gromoll, and E. Nieschlag, “Role of FSH in male gonadal function,” Annales d'Endocrinologie, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 102–106, 1999.

A. M. Matsumoto, “Hormonal therapy of male hypogonadism,” Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 857–875, 1994.

R. W. Whitcomb and W. F. Crowley Jr., “Clinical review 4: diagnosis and treatment of isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency in men,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 1990.

I. Mastrogiacomo, R. G. Motta, S. Botteon, G. Bonanni, and M. Schiesaro, “Achievement of spermatogenesis and genital tract maturation in hypogonadotropic hypogonadic subjects during long term treatment with gonadotropins or LHRH,” Andrologia, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 285–289, 1991.

European Metrodin HP Study Group, “Efficacy and safety of highly purified urinary folliclestimulating hormone with chorionic gonadotropin for treating men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 70, pp. 256–262, 1998.

A. Isidori, M. Latini, and F. Romanelli, “Treatment of male infertility,” Contraception, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 314–318, 2005.

D. Madhukar and S. Rajender, “Hormonal treatment of male infertility: promise and pitfalls,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 95–112, 2009.

F. Iacono, S. Barra, L. Montano, and T. Lotti, “Contribution of high-dose pure FSH in the treatment of idiopathic male infertility,” Journal d'Urologie, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 81–84, 1996.

G. Arnaldi, G. Balercia, G. Barbatelli, and F. Mantero, “Effects of long-term treatment with human pure follicle-stimulating hormone on semen parameters and sperm-cell ultrastructure in idiopathic oligoteratoasthenozoospermia,” Andrologia, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2000.

C. Foresta, A. Bettella, M. Merico et al., “FSH in the treatment of oligozoospermia,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 161, no. 1-2, pp. 89–97, 2000.

E. Caroppo, C. Niederberger, G. M. Vizziello, and G. D'Amato, “Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone as a pretreatment for idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1398–1403, 2003.

M. Fernández-Arjona, J. Díaz, I. Cortes, J. González, J. M. Rodriguez, and E. Alvarez, “Relationship between gonadotrophin secretion, inhibin B and spermatogenesis in oligozoospermic men treated with highly purified urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (uFSH-HP): a preliminary report,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2003.

A. A. Acosta, E. Khalifa, and S. Oehninger, “Pure human follicle stimulating hormone has a role in the treatment of severe male infertility by assisted reproduction: norfolk's total experience,” Human Reproduction, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1067–1072, 1992.

Z. Ben-Rafael, J. Farhi, D. Feldberg et al., “Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment for men with idiopathic oligoteratoasthenozoospermia before in vitro fertilization: the impact on sperm microstructure and fertilization potential,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2000.

B. Baccetti, P. Piomboni, E. Bruni et al., “Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone on sperm quality and pregnancy rate,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 133–137, 2004.

R. Matorras, C. Pérez, B. Corcóstegui et al., “Treatment of the male with follicle-stimulating hormone in intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa: a randomized study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–28, 1997.

A. Kamischke, H. M. Behre, M. Bergmann, M. Simoni, T. Schäfer, and E. Nieschlag, “Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone for treatment of male idiopathic infertility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 596–603, 1998.

O. Efesoy, S. Çayan, and E. Akbay, “The efficacy of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of various types of male-factor infertility at a single university hospital,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 679–684, 2009.

A. Lenzi, G. Balercia, A. Bellastella et al., “Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 934–938, 2009.

G. Cavallini, “Male idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 143–157, 2006.

J. G. Alvarez, R. K. Sharma, M. Ollero et al., “Increased DNA damage in sperm from leukocytospermic semen samples as determined by the sperm chromatin structure assay,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 319–329, 2002.

M. J. Tomlinson, A. White, C. L. R. Barratt, A. E. Bolton, and I. D. Cooke, “The removal of morphologically abnormal sperm forms by phagocytes: a positive role for seminal leukocytes?” Human Reproduction, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 517–522, 1992.

J. Aitken, C. Krausz, and D. Buckingham, “Relationships between biochemical markers for residual sperm cytoplasm, reactive oxygen species generation, and the presence of leukocytes and precursor germ cells in human sperm suspensions,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 268–279, 1994.

T. Domes, K. C. Lo, E. D. Grober, J. B. M. Mullen, T. Mazzulli, and K. Jarvi, “The incidence and effect of bacteriospermia and elevated seminal leukocytes on semen parameters,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1050–1055, 2012.

V. Barraud-Lange, J.-C. Pont, A. Ziyyat et al., “Seminal leukocytes are good Samaritans for spermatozoa,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1315–1319, 2011.

H. Wolff, “The biologic significance of white blood cells in semen,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1143–1157, 1995.

S. Seshadri, B. Flanagan, G. Vince, and D. J. Lewis-Jones, “Detection of subpopulations of leucocytes in different subgroups of semen sample qualities,” Andrologia, vol. 44, pp. 354–361, 2012.

World Health Organization, WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 5th edition, 2010.

J. E. Lackner, R. Herwig, J. Schmidbauer, G. Schatzl, C. Kratzik, and M. Marberger, “Correlation of leukocytospermia with clinical infection and the positive effect of antiinflammatory treatment on semen quality,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 601–605, 2006.

G. Ricci, G. Presani, S. Guaschino, R. Simeone, and S. Perticarari, “Leukocyte detection in human semen using flow cytometry,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1329–1337, 2000.

J. A. Politch, H. Wolff, J. A. Hill, and D. J. Anderson, “Comparison of methods to enumerate white blood cells in semen,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 372–375, 1993.

H. Sakamoto, T. Yajima, M. Nagata, T. Okumura, K. Suzuki, and Y. Ogawa, “Relationship between testicular size by ultrasonography and testicular function: measurement of testicular length, width, and depth in patients with infertility,” International Journal of Urology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 529–533, 2008.

A. Pilatz, A. Rusz, F. Wagenlehner, W. Weidner, and B. Altinkilic, “Reference values for testicular volume, epididymal head size and peak systolic velocity of the testicular artery in adult males measured by ultrasonography,” Ultraschall in der Medizin, vol. 34, pp. 349–354, 2013.

G.-M. Pinggera, M. Mitterberger, G. Bartsch et al., “Assessment of the intratesticular resistive index by colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements as a predictor of spermatogenesis,” BJU International, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 722–726, 2008.

A. W. Endtz, “A rapid staining method for differentiating granulocytes from “germinal cells” in papanicolaou stained semen,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2–7, 1974.

E. Johanisson, A. Campana, R. Luthi, and A. de Agostini, “Evaluation of 'round cells' in semen analysis: a comparative study,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 404–412, 2000.

D. Valenti, S. La Vignera, R. A. Condorelli et al., “Follicle-stimulating hormone treatment in normogonadotropic infertile men,” Nature Reviews Urology, vol. 10, pp. 55–62, 2013.

A. A. Acosta, S. Oehninger, H. Ertunc, and C. Philput, “Possible role of pure human follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of severe male-factor infertility by assisted reproduction: preliminary report,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1150–1156, 1991.

B. Bartoov, F. Eltes, E. Lunenfeld, D. Har-Even, H. Lederman, and B. Lunenfeld, “Sperm quality of subfertile males before and after treatment with human follicle-stimulating hormone,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 727–734, 1994.

B. Baccetti, E. Strehler, S. Capitani et al., “The effect of follicle stimulating hormone therapy on human sperm structure,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1955–1968, 1997.

H.-J. Glander and J. Kratzschr, “Effects of pure human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (pFSH) on sperm quality correlate with the hypophyseal response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH),” Andrologia, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 1997.

R. Paradisi, P. Busacchi, R. Seracchioli, E. Porcu, and S. Venturoli, “Effects of high doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in the treatment of male factor infertility: results of a pilot study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 728–731, 2006.

G. R. Marshall, D. S. Zorub, and T. M. Plant, “Follicle-stimulating hormone amplifies the population of differentiated spermatogonia in the hypophysectomized testosterone-replaced adult rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta),” Endocrinology, vol. 136, no. 8, pp. 3504–3511, 1995.

P. Y. Liu, L. T. Xirner, D. Rushford et al., “Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (Gonal-F) with urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for induction of spermatogenesis and fertility in gonadotrophin-deficient men,” Human Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1540–1545, 1999.

C. Foresta, A. Bettella, A. Ferlin, A. Garolla, and M. Rossato, “Evidence for a stimulatory role of follicle-stimulating hormone on the spermatogonial population in adult males,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 636–642, 1998.

S. Palomba, A. Falbo, S. Espinola et al., “Effects of highly purified follicle-stimulating hormone on sperm DNA damage in men with male idiopathic subfertility: a pilot study,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 747–752, 2011.

N. Colacurci, M. G. Monti, F. Fornaro et al., “Recombinant human FSH reduces sperm DNA fragmentation in men with idiopathic oligoasthenoteratozoospermia,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 33, pp. 588–593, 2012.

M. I. M. El-Demiry, H. Young, and R. A. Elton, “Leucocytes in the ejaculate from fertile and infertile men,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 715–720, 1986.

W. Eggert-Kruse, A. Bellmann, G. Rohr, W. Tilgen, and B. Runnebaum, “Differentiation of round cells in semen by means of monoclonal antibodies and relationship with male fertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1046–1055, 1992.

D. C. Smith, C. L. R. Barratt, and M. A. Williams, “The characterisation of non-sperm cells in the ejaculates of fertile men using transmission electron microscopy,” Andrologia, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 319–333, 1989.

R. A. Saleh, A. Agarwal, E. Kandirali et al., “Leukocytospermia is associated with increased reactive oxygen species production by human spermatozoa,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1215–1224, 2002.

R. K. Sharma, A. E. Pasqualotto, D. R. Nelson, A. J. Thomas, and A. Agarwal, “Relationship between seminal white blood cell counts and oxidative stress in men treated at an infertility clinic,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 575–583, 2001.

S. Kaleli, F. Öçer, T. Irez, E. Budak, and M. F. Aksu, “Does leukocytospermia associate with poor semen parameters and sperm functions in male infertility? The role of different seminal leukocyte concentrations,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 2000.

A. A. Kiessling, N. Lamparelli, H.-Z. Yin, M. M. Seibel, and R. C. Eyre, “Semen leukocytes: friends or foes?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 196–198, 1995.