Woody plant resources continue to disappear in anthropogenic landscapes in Uganda. To slow down further loss of these resources requires the collaboration of farmers in tree planting in agroforestry systems. Tree planting interventions with the collaboration of farmers require a good understanding of tree management practices as well as trees that best satisfy farmers’ needs. We carried out this research to determine (1) the most preferred tree species and reasons why they are preferred, (2) the species conservation statuses, and (3) existing tree management practices and challenges to tree planting. Fourteen priority species valued because they yield edible fruits and timber have been prioritised in this study. Farmers are interested in managing trees but are constrained by many factors, key among which is scarcity of land and financial capital to manage tree planting. Trees are managed in crop fields and around the homestead. From farmers’ reports, the highly valued species are increasing in the landscape. In conclusion, the potential to manage trees in agroforestry systems exists but is hampered by many challenges. Secondly, the liking of trees that supply edible fruits seems to support the welfare maximisation theory which ideally states that rural people manage trees with the aim of having regular access to products that satisfy their household needs and not for income generation.
Woody species (i.e., tree and shrubs) are threatened with local extinction and are disappearing fast, most especially in tropical Africa [
The reasons that lead to loss of trees are chiefly land use change. In most parts of the world including Uganda land cover has been converted from woodlands or forests to create land for crop and livestock agriculture. The underlying cause for most of the land use change and consequently woody cover loss, in Uganda, is human population growth. The rapid human population growth estimated at more than 3% per annum has increased demand for land for cultivation and settlement, as well as woody products. In Uganda people exploit woody resources as fire wood, for timber and poles for construction purposes [
The rapid loss of trees and shrubs threatens livelihoods that are dependent on those resources. Human populations, globally, depend very much on plant resources for their sustenance and economy [
To address the challenge of fast tree cover loss in Uganda will require increases in rates of tree planting. At present Uganda has made important strides in tree planting on lands outside protected areas through interventions for establishment of tree plantations. However, most of these interventions such as the Sawlog Production Growers Scheme (SPGS) have targeted large plantation farmers and have ignored small holder farmers. Successful increase in tree/shrub cover requires the participation of small holder farmers because they own most of the land in Uganda: approximately 70% of all land in Uganda is privately owned by small holder farmers [
To involve farmers, we need to understand their attitudes and perceptions concerning tree management, how they currently manage species, and what challenges hinder tree growing or which opportunities exist for growing trees. Farmers make decisions whether to participate or not in interventions such as tree growing based on considerations of how such interventions maximise their welfare and also fit into their livelihood strategy and available resources [
Additionally, farming systems include a wide variety of agroforestry practices. These tend to vary from place to place in both extent and intensity of management [
Bunya County is found in Mayuge District, Eastern Uganda, at 00°12′N, 33°32′E, and approximately 120 km from Kampala the Capital City of Uganda. The district neighbours other major towns, namely, Iganga and Jinja. This means that there is high demand for tree products.
The district has a tropical climate with a bimodal rainfall pattern with peaks in March–May and October-November; the rainfall ranges between 900 and 1200 mm per annum. The district is endowed with fertile soils and hence has high potential for agriculture. The topography is relatively flat with high ridges and isolated hills, wavy low lands, and open water reserves [
The vegetation of Mayuge has adversely been affected by rapid population growth with its attendant problems of deforestation, environmental degradation, and pollution [
The population of the district is estimated at approximately 473,000 people and the population density at 440 people/km2 [
Field work for this study was carried out between July and September 2012. The study adopted an ethnobotanical approach. We conducted interviews using structured open and close ended questionnaire in face to face interviews with household heads.
Respondents were selected using multistage sampling procedure based on administrative units. In Uganda 5 or 6 villages make a parish, a similar number of parishes make a subcounty, and a similar number of subcounties are collected to make a county. Using random sampling procedure, three subcounties were selected from each county and, from each of these, one parish was randomly selected. Lastly, from each selected parish one village was selected. Thirty households were then selected from each of the three villages to make a total of 90 respondents (44 of these were female).
The interviews were designed to collect information on the most preferred species. Free listing techniques were used, where informants were requested to list ten species that came first to mind. This technique was important because the aim was to focus on the most important species and people tend to mention important species first [
Voucher specimens were collected and taken to Makerere University Herbarium (MHU) where identification and archiving were done. The survey data was summarised into frequencies/percentages using Microsoft Excel 2007. To test for relationships within the data set, frequencies were computed and chi-square tests were carried out on cross tabulations. Preferences were ranked based on frequencies considering the species with higher frequencies to be the most preferred.
A use value was computed for each species using the expression below:
The respondents interviewed in this study were mostly peasant farmers (82%) who earn their livelihood through subsistence farming of food crops that include maize, cassava, sorghum, and sweet potatoes and also cash crops like sugar cane. The respondents are mostly Christians of mixed denominations: Protestants, Catholics, and Pentecostals (Table
Respondents’ sociodemographic details
Attribute | Percentage |
---|---|
|
|
<30 | 26 |
30–49 | 40 |
50–69 | 30 |
>70 | 4 |
|
|
None | 31 |
Primary | 42 |
Secondary | 23 |
Tertiary | 3 |
|
|
Female headed | 23 |
Male headed | 77 |
|
|
Musoga | 59 |
Japadhola | 14 |
Muganda | 6 |
Other tribes | 21 |
|
|
Moslem | 43 |
Protestant | 32 |
Catholic | 20 |
Pentecostal | 4 |
Fourteen tree species are valued by the people of Bunya County. The species have been prioritised based on computed use values and reports by respondents that they are grown by the people of Bunya and that they will continue to grow them in the future and also because the species were mentioned by 30% or more of the respondents (Table
Species | Total use value | Use value by category | Respondents mentioning species (%) | Respondents who have planted species (%) | Respondents planning to plant species (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edible fruit | Timber | Construction poles and wood | Firewood | Income | |||||
|
1.30 | 0.93 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 99 | 72 | 31 |
|
1.23 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 99 | 87 | 31 | |
|
1.03 | 0.01 | 0.57 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 73 | 42 | 15 |
|
1.01 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 86 | 67 | 24 | |
|
1.00 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 67 | 46 | 55 | |
|
0.83 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 33 | 51 | 10 | |
|
0.68 | 0.13 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 50 | 43 | 6 | |
|
0.57 | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 47 | 22 | 3 |
|
0.56 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 30 | 17 | 13 | ||
|
0.50 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 39 | 23 | 43 |
|
0.50 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
|
30 | 53 | 16 | ||
|
0.46 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 44 | 44 | 8 | |||
|
0.37 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 26 | 23 | 1 | ||
|
0.18 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 51 | 11 | 20 |
These priority species are multipurpose that yield products that include edible fruits, timber, construction, and firewood. The most frequently mentioned species were
Some species are known to deliver the following ecosystem services: providing shade for crops (e.g.,
Some tree products are sold to earn incomes; however, only 7% of the respondents sell tree products to get income, and they sell mostly edible fruits. Other products commonly sold and the species that they are gathered from are shown in Table
Species and products sold in the study area. The numbers are frequencies of respondents who say that products from species are sold for money.
Edible fruits | Timber | Fuelwood | Living tree | Seedlings | Charcoal | Seeds | Poles | Round wood | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
27 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
18 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
17 | 1 | |||||||
|
10 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
|
12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||
|
9 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
5 | 1 | 1 |
Females mentioned slightly more species than males; however, there was no statistical association between species and gender (
Overall, woody species according to respondents are declining in abundance mostly because of destructive exploitation to get products like timber or charcoal (80%), from clearing land for agriculture (9%) or pests (9%). The conservation status, specific to prioritised woody species, was determined in Bunya County by asking respondents to list species that are becoming scarce (hard to find) and those that are increasing or becoming abundant. A comparison was made on the perception of whether a species was increasing or declining based on a comparison of the numbers of respondents stating that a species was declining or increasing. And from this the greater of the two frequencies was taken to be the conservation status of the species (Table
Conservation status of tree species.
Species | Scarce | Abundant | Status |
---|---|---|---|
|
14 | 19 | Abundant |
|
12 | 55 | Abundant |
|
10 | 51 | Abundant |
|
10 | 30 | Abundant |
|
8 | 52 | Abundant |
|
2 | 26 | Abundant |
|
4 | 19 | Abundant |
|
9 | 18 | Abundant |
|
1 | 12 | Abundant |
|
1 | 9 | Abundant |
|
1 | 9 | Abundant |
|
67 | 3 | Scarce |
|
34 | 1 | Scarce |
|
10 | 4 | Scarce |
|
9 | 2 | Scarce |
|
5 | Scarce |
Mayuge in the recent past has experienced increased sugar cane growing and this has forced people to convert large tracts of land to this crop. Other factors were pests and diseases, lack of knowledge on how to propagate woody species, and lack of planting materials or the fact that they are not planted or protected by farmers in the area. Abundant species are on the other hand increasing because they are planted or are protected by farmers when found growing naturally. The abundance of woody species was attributed to active husbandry by planting and protection as well on the intrinsic nature of the species in that they propagate easily. This is shown in Table
Reasons to explain increases in species availability in Bunya County. The species in this table are not necessarily the most valued.
Species | Planted | Protected | Propagates easily | Drought resistant | Grows naturally | Matures fast | Pest resistant | Dispersed by birds | Seedlings available |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
16 | 14 | 5 | 1 | |||||
|
29 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
|
17 | 10 | 4 | 1 | |||||
|
23 | 1 | |||||||
|
13 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
|
10 | 4 | 3 | ||||||
|
6 | 3 | 4 | ||||||
|
1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | ||||
|
3 | 4 | 1 | ||||||
|
2 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
|
1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
|
1 | 1 | |||||||
|
1 | 1 | |||||||
|
|||||||||
Total | 131 | 47 | 29 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Farmers in Bunya County are interested in tree planting and are actively involved. All respondents who participated in this study had planted a tree in the last 5 years and were willing to plant more in future. Trees are propagated from seed, seedlings, wildings, and cuttings. Seedlings are prepared by farmers or purchased from nursery gardens managed by farmers (Table
Common tree management practices, planting materials, where trees are maintained, and source of planting materials as reported by respondents.
Tree husbandry practices | Number | Planting materials | Number |
---|---|---|---|
Planting | 28 | Seeds | 38 |
Protection against damage | 26 | Seedlings | 31 |
Pruning | 18 | Wildings | 27 |
Root suckering | 3 | Cuttings | 4 |
|
|||
|
|
||
Crop field | 42 | My land | 97 |
Backyard | 29 | Others (local administration = 2; bought, neighbour) | 4 |
Compound or courtyard | 27 | ||
Hedge | 2 | ||
Along the road | 1 |
The people besides having an intrinsic interest in tree planting also receive encouragement from many different sources, chief among which is the radio, and from other farmers and village or other subnational meetings (Table
Sources of information for tree planting.
Sources of information | Frequency |
---|---|
Radio | 37 |
Seminars1 | 16 |
Other farmers | 16 |
Relatives | 5 |
School | 3 |
Church and mosque | 3 |
Others2 | 4 |
Environmental officers/representatives | 1 |
Busoga Forest Company | 1 |
Television | 1 |
Farmers in Bunya County who did not plant trees were asked to give reasons that hinder them from planting trees and, according to them, the major reasons were pests (termites), drought, lack of land, diseases (that attack mostly coffee and oranges), and lack of seeds and seedlings (Table
Constraints to tree growing.
Constraints | Frequency |
---|---|
Pests, mostly termites and rarely moles ( |
45 |
Drought | 42 |
Lack of land | 19 |
Tree diseases (coffee, oranges, and avocado are mostly affected) | 9 |
Lack of seeds and seedlings | 9 |
Lack of funds to purchase inputs, for example, fertilizers | 8 |
Limited labour | 6 |
Domestic animals | 4 |
Destruction or theft of seedlings | 4 |
Lack of market for tree products | 2 |
Government ban to stop people from cutting their own trees | 1 |
Some trees, for example, Mvule, cannot be intercropped with other crops | 1 |
The 14 species prioritised in this study are valued mostly for their edible fruits, firewood, timber, and construction wood/poles. These benefits justify increased investment in the development of agroforestry systems that will contribute to food security [
Different attributes have made many species easy to maintain in the community. The species that are perceived to be abundant all have fast rates of growth, are easy to propagate, and have high survival rates [
Some tree species are perceived to be declining in abundance: those that are slow growing species and those that are lowly valued by farmers. They are not actively managed by planting. The exceptions are
Two of the key reasons for not planting trees are linked to lack of knowledge on pest and disease management and can be addressed through training on pest and disease management. Other challenges such as lack of funds to purchase inputs, for example, fertilizers, have been recognized by the Ugandan government as a key bottleneck to tree planting and maintenance (NPA, 2010). More to that, sugar cane growing in Mayuge has taken most of the land that would be available for tree growing. These factors reduce the appeal for farmers to maintain tree species in agroforestry systems and will need addressing by the responsible institutions such as NAADS (National Agricultural Advisory Services) or NFA (National Forestry Authority) and others.
The challenge of land scarcity can be addressed by encouraging and incentivising farmers with large pieces of land to plant more trees on their farms. Elsewhere, in Kenya, farmers faced with land scarcity decided to use land borders or hedgerows, where trees least interfere with food crop growing [
Concerning seedlings, community level tree nurseries need to be established for easing access to seedlings of priority tree species. Care must be taken not to give farmers free seedlings as it has been observed that some farmers who receive free seedlings abandon them [
Over and above these factors, and notwithstanding the fact that the trees are presently valued for their subsistence value, increases in tree planting will not happen unless decent markets for tree products are created. The most important stimulus for active tree growing is presence of markets for tree products (ICRAF website). Residents of Bunya County are willing to collaborate with the government and other relevant stakeholders in maintaining priority woody species. This can be possible by providing them with inputs including seeds and seedlings for planting and chemicals for spraying, conservation education, and capital to buy equipment and land. Lack of land was a major hindrance to tree planting and conservation in the areas visited.
Opportunities for cultivating trees within Bunya exist because tree species are valued for their products. In this study we have generated a short list of 14 priority species that implementers can choose from when promoting tree planting. The priority species are valued mostly for their edible fruits, timber, firewood, and poles especially for construction purposes. Interventions to plant trees should focus on the priority species identified here, because these are the ones that farmers are interested in managing. According to Franzel et al. [
Trees are maintained in crop fields and home-gardens as well as in the compound and are propagated from seedlings, wildings, and cuttings. There is little evidence of commercial nursery tree operators. This shows that farmers cannot afford the cost of seedlings.
Many challenges that impact on tree growing have been identified in this study. The most significant in this study is that the market for nonwood tree products is very weak. If markets for tree products remain poor, farmers will not dedicate their best effort to tree planting and maintenance.
Farmers need training and sensitization on better methods of tree planting and management and the role of trees in climate change abatement. There is need to study markets of tree products in this area and other parts of Uganda to understand this value chain with a view to strengthening tree products markets and to provide a decent return on tree investment. There is also need to conduct an ecological study to determine the floristic composition and stocking rate of woody species in Bunya County. This will inform the need to plant trees and also the land use units on the farm where trees can be planted.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
This study was supported by a Rockefeller Foundation funded project (no. 2009CL1323). In a special way, the authors would like to extend their sincere thanks to all the respondents for providing this information and to the local district administration for all the help they provided to the authors. Mr. Samuel Kakungu, the Local Council Chairperson of Buwaaya village, moved with the authors from home to home showing them households they needed to interview.