International Journal of Hypertension
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 6413102, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6413102

Research Article

A Comparison on Prevalence of Hypertension and Related Risk Factors between Island and Rural Residents of Dalian City, China

Baiting Liu,¹ Hainiang Liu,² Rongmei Na,¹ Xiaofei Li,³ Qianxiao Li,⁴ Libo Chen,⁵ Wencheng Tu,⁶ Jiahui Hu,⁷ Dong Cheng,² Yalan Cao,⁸ Zhu Li,⁹ Weiyi Fang,¹⁰ Ning Zhu,¹¹ and Qin Yu¹

¹Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China
²Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian 116022, China
³Linqu County Procuratorate, Weifang 262600, China
⁴Department of Cardiology, Zhejiang Province Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou 310012, China
⁵Department of Cardiology, People’s Hospital of Jilin City, Jilin 132000, China
⁶Department of Cardiology, Jingmen No.1 People Hospital, Jingmen 448000, China
⁷Department of Cardiology, Suihua No.1 Hospital, Suihua 152000, China
⁸Medical College, Zunyi University, Zunyi 563100, China
⁹Department of Cardiology, Zhuanghe Central Hospital, Dalian 116400, China
¹⁰Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China
¹¹Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116023, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Qin Yu; dryuqin060621@sina.com

Received 25 October 2018; Revised 27 March 2019; Accepted 28 April 2019; Published 13 May 2019

Academic Editor: Tomohiro Katsuya

Copyright © 2019 Baiting Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

This study aimed to compare the prevalence of hypertension between the island and rural residents in Dalian, China, and to explore associated risk factors of hypertension in order to provide evidence for the establishment of targeted strategy of hypertension prevention and treatment for island and rural residents. The modified MONICA questionnaire survey was performed on 7764 island and rural residents aged ≥40 years (including 2652 island residents and 5112 rural residents). Our data showed that totally weighted prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in rural residents than in island residents (61.9% vs. 55.2%, P<0.001). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that older age, higher BMI, lower education level, and higher LDL-C and UA levels were independently associated with increased risk of having hypertension both in island and in rural residents. The weighted awareness rate (29.9% vs. 17.3%, P<0.001), treatment rate (51.4% vs. 28.5%, P<0.001), and control rate (36.3% vs. 24.0%, P=0.001) of hypertension were all significantly higher in island residents than those in rural residents. In conclusion, our survey shows that the epidemics of hypertension are extremely high in surveyed residents in island and rural areas of Dalian city, while awareness, treatment, and control rats of hypertension in these residents are much lower than the national level. The scenario is even worse in rural residents as compared with island residents of Dalian, China.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of hypertension is increasing constantly in mainland China in line with the population aging process and rapid economic development over recent decades. Hypertension is remarkably related to increased risk of cardiovascular comorbidities and mortality [1]. Based on a national survey of the prevalence of hypertension in China between 2012 and 2015, 23.2% of the Chinese adult population ≥18 years of age suffered from hypertension [2]. There is a significant difference in prevalence of hypertension in various regions of China due to the impact of complex geographical patterns and economic and cultural diversity. For example, in economically developed regions, the prevalence of hypertension is significantly higher among rural residents than among urban residents (31.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.001), whereas this disparity in the prevalence of hypertension between urban and rural areas disappeared in the northern region (31.6% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.505) [3]. Also, according to the recent data, similar prevalence of hypertension between urban and rural residents in China was reported (23.4% vs. 23.1%, P=0.819) [2]. Therefore, it is of importance to investigate region-related prevalence and related risk factors of hypertension in various regions in order to help formulate and devise local public health strategies and approaches in the prevention and management of hypertension.

In 2012, we conducted an epidemiological survey on prevalence of hypertension on permanent residents living in an island encircled by the Yellow Sea (Zhangzi Island) and residents living on a coast district near the Yellow Sea (Zhuanghe District). Zhangzi Island is one of the islands in the Yellow Sea and 55 km from Zhuanghe District. Most residents on Zhangzi Island live on fishing and fisheries processing. Zhuanghe District lies in the north coast of the Yellow Sea. Most residents in Zhuanghe District live on farming. In present study, we investigated the epidemic features and risk factors of hypertension in the island (Zhangzi Island) and rural (Zhuanghe District) residents; our data might be helpful in the establishment of more effective and targeted prevention and management strategies for residents living in these areas.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

A total of 8347 permanent residents aged ≥18 years in Zhangzi Island and Zhuanghe District took part in this survey. Proportion of participants aged <40 years was 10.8% in the island area and 4.7% in the rural area, respectively. Most of young male residents both in island and in rural areas were absent at the time of survey because they lived outside of their hometown for work. Thus, the majority of participants comprised of female and middle-aged or elderly male residents. Eventually, 2652 island residents (716 male and 1936 female) and 5112 rural residents (1750 male and 3362 female) aged ≥40 years were included in this study for the final analysis.

2.2. Questionnaire Survey

“Survey Questionnaire of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors” derived from amendatory MONICA study was used in this study [4, 5]. The survey staffs received training on data collection before the survey.

2.3. Definitions

Blood pressure was measured as previously described [6]. Briefly, blood pressure was measured twice by trained examiners following a standardized protocol using aneroid sphygmomanometers. Participants sat with both feet on the floor for at least five minutes before the first measurement. The two blood pressure measurements were taken at least two minutes apart. Hypertension is defined according to “The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure” (JNC 7) [7]. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups as follows: Group 1, normotensive participants (i.e., no medical history of hypertension and SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg measured at the survey time); Group 2, hypertensive participants (self-reported hypertension with or without antihypertensive medications use or SBP≥140 mmHg and/or DBP≥90 mmHg measured at the survey time). Weight status was defined by body mass index (BMI) according to the lower cutoff values recommended by WHO experts for Asians, i.e., overweight as BMI ≥ 24 kg/m² and obesity as BMI ≥ 28 kg/m² [8–10]. Participants who were currently smoking cigarettes, bides, or hookah with an average of more than 1 cigarette daily were defined as current daily smokers [11]. Participants who were consuming alcohol within the past 1 year and daily alcohol consumption (alcohol content) ≥25g in men and ≥15g in women were defined as current alcohol drinkers [12]. The highest education level of participants was categorized into 5 levels: illiterate or semiliterate, primary education, secondary education, upper secondary education, and tertiary or higher education.

2.4. Biochemistry Examination

Blood samples were taken from all participants at the time of survey. Laboratory analysis including serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), urea, creatinine, and uric acid (UA) was performed. Hyperuricemia was defined if serum UA >420 μmol/L in men and postmenopausal women and serum UA >360 μmol/L in premenopausal women according to the current recommendations of Chinese experts consensus [13, 14].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median (quartiles). Differences on continuous variables between groups were compared using unpaired two-sample Student’s t-test after normalization if indicated. Nonnormally distributed variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared across groups using a Chi-square test for the overall test and column proportions were compared using z-test. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent risk factors of hypertension in this cohort. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Survey data were weighed based on the Sixth National Population Census of the People’s Republic of China in 2010 [15] to calculate weighted prevalence, awareness rate, treatment rate, and control rate of hypertension. A significance level of 0.05 was used. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS, version 22 for Windows (SPSS).

2.6. Ethical Consideration

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethical Committee of Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University. All the participants signed informed consent.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

Table 1 shows the age and sex distribution data of island and rural residents.

Table 1: The age and sex distribution in residents living in the island and rural areas.

Age (years)
Island
Rural

Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total

N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)
N (%)

40-49
72 (10.1)
513 (26.5)
585 (22.1)
165 (9.4)
720 (21.4)
885 (17.3)

50-59
128 (17.9)
659 (34.0)
787 (29.7)
368 (21.0)
1051 (31.3)
1419 (27.8)

60-69
304 (42.5)
521 (26.9)
825 (31.1)
707 (39.9)
1065 (60.1)
1772 (34.7)

70-79
166 (23.2)
199 (10.3)
365 (13.8)
394 (22.5)
457 (13.6)
851 (16.6)

≥80
46 (6.4)
44 (2.3)
90 (3.4)
116 (6.6)
69 (2.1)
185 (3.6)

Sum
716
1936
2652
1750
3362
5112

3.2. Weighted Prevalence of Hypertension Stratified by Age and Sex

The systolic blood pressures (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) in island and rural residents are shown in Table 2. SBP (144 ± 18 vs. 144 ± 18 mmHg, P>0.05) and DBP (92 ± 9 vs. 92 ± 9 mmHg, P>0.05) were similar between island and rural residents with hypertension.

Table 2: The systolic and diastolic blood pressures in island and rural residents (mmHg).

Island

Rural

Normotensive
Hypertensive
Total
Normotensive
Hypertensive
Total

SBP

DBP

P<0.05 vs. normotensive; † P<0.05 vs. Island. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

Totally weighted prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in rural residents than in island residents (61.9% vs. 55.2%, P<0.001). As shown in Table 3, weighted prevalence of hypertension in island residents was 55.2% (95% CI 53.3-57.0%) and was significantly higher in males than in females (61.2% vs. 48.8%, P<0.001). The prevalence of hypertension in rural residents was 61.9% (95% CI 60.5-63.2%) and was similar between males and females (61.3% vs. 62.6%, P=0.561).

Table 3: Weighted prevalence of hypertension stratified by age and sex [% (95% CI)].

Island

Rural

Males
Females
Total
Males
Females
Total

Age (years)

40-49
59.7 (47.5-71.7)
34.1 (30.0-38.4)
47.7 (44.7-50.7)
52.7 (44.8-60.5)
47.6  (43.9-51.4)
50.6 (48.2-53.0)

50-59
61.7 (52.7-70.2)
53.6 (49.7-57.4)
56.6 (53.5-59.6)
63.0 (57.9-68.0)
64.4 (61.4-67.3)
63.9† (61.6-66.1)

60-69
61.2 (55.5-66.7)
62.8 (58.5-66.9)
61.2 (55.5-66.7)
63.9 (60.3-67.5)
71.4 (68.5-74.1)
63.9† (60.3-67.5)

70-79
60.8 (53.0-68.3)
65.8 (58.8-72.4)
63.6 (58.4-68.5)
72.1 (67.4-76.5)
77.7 (73.6-81.4)
75.1† (72.0-78.0)

80-99
78.3 (63.6-89.1)
72.7 (57.2-85.0)
75.6 (65.4-84.0)
69.8 (60.6-78.0)
76.8 (65.1-86.1)
73.6 (67.7-78.9)

Total
61.2 (58.7-63.7)
48.8 (46.2-51.5)
55.2 (53.3-57.0)
61.3 (59.5-63.0)
62.6 (60.6-64.5)
61.9† (60.5-63.2)

P<0.05 vs. Males; † P<0.05 vs. Island.

As expected, the prevalence of hypertension increased with age in both island and rural groups. The hypertension prevalence was significantly lower in island residents than in rural residents at 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 year age groups, respectively. Hypertension prevalence remained unchanged in various groups of age in male residents, while hypertension prevalence increased continuously after age 50 in female residents living both in island area and in rural area.

3.3. Blood Parameters

As shown in Table 4, serum TC, TG, LDL-C, urea, creatinine, and UA levels were significantly higher and HDL-C was significantly lower in island residents than in rural residents. Serum TC, TG, LDL-C, urea, creatinine, and UA levels were significantly higher in the hypertensive group than in the normotensive group both in island residents and in rural residents. HDL-C was significantly lower in the hypertensive group than in the normotensive group in island residents, while it was similar between groups in rural residents.

Table 4: The blood biochemical parameters in island and rural residents.

Island

Rural

Normotensive
Hypertensive
Total
Normotensive
Hypertensive
Total

TC (mmol/L)

TG (mmol/L)

HDL-C (mmol/L)

LDL-C (mmol/L)

Urea (mmol/L)

CREA (μmol/L)

UA (μmol/L)

P<0.05 vs. Normotensive; †P<0.05 vs. Island. TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CREA: creatinine; UA: uric acid.

3.4. BMI

BMI of island residents was higher in island residents than in rural residents (25.1 ± 3.5 vs. 24.3 ± 3.41, P<0.001). The prevalence of hypertension increased with increasing BMI both in island residents (33.3% in underweight, 44.6% in normal BMI, 55.7% in overweight, and 74.6% in obesity, respectively) and in rural residents (45.7%, 54.2%, 66.4%, and 80.1%, respectively, Table 5).

Table 5: Weighted prevalence of hypertension stratified by BMI in island and rural residents.

Island

Rural
P value

BMI (kg/m²)
Mean ± SD
25.1±3.5
Mean ± SD
24.3 ± 3.4
<0.001

No.
Prevalence of HP
No.
Prevalence of HP
<0.001

    Underweight
13/43
33.3 (20.0-49.0)
60/145
45.7 (37.8-53.7)

    Normal
464/1032
44.6 (41.7-47.6)
1205/2328
54.2 (52.2-56.2)

    Overweight
556/994
55.7 (52.7-58.7)†‡
1245/1908
66.4 (64.2-68.5) †‡

    Obesity
434/581
74.6 (71.0-77.9)†‡§
576/727
80.1 (77.0-83.0) †‡§

    P value

<0.001

<0.001

P<0.05 vs. Island; † P<0.05 vs. underweight; ‡ P<0.05 vs. Normal; § P<0.05 vs. Overweight. BMI: body mass index; HP: hypertension.

3.5. Smoking and Alcohol Drinking

In surveyed island residents, proportions of smoking and alcohol drinking were 13.5% (358/2652) and 12.8% (340/2652), respectively. In surveyed rural residents, proportions of smoking and alcohol drinking were 19.3% (998/5112) and 12.7% (651/5112).

The weighted prevalence of hypertension was similar between no smoking group and smoking group both in island residents (no smoking 55.1% vs. smoking 55.4%, P=0.963) and in rural residents (62.9% vs. 59.4%, P=0.071).

The weighted prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in alcohol drinking group than in no alcohol drinking group in island residents (alcohol drinking 64.7% vs. no alcohol drinking 52.9%, P<0.001), while it remained similar between groups in rural residents (61.4% vs. 63.5%, P=0.187).

3.6. Education Levels

Proportions of illiterate or semiliterate, primary education, lower secondary education, upper secondary education, and tertiary or higher education were 11.7%, 37.8%, 41.9%, 5.7%, and 2.9% in island residents and were 20.3%, 39.2%, 31.2%, 8.1%, and 1.3% in rural residents, respectively.

The prevalence of hypertension decreased with increase in education levels both in island residents (68.5% vs. 64.7% vs. 46.1% vs. 42.4% vs. 39.5%, P<0.001) and in rural residents (70.3% vs. 57.4% vs. 54.1% vs. 57.9% vs. 44.7%, P<0.001). Among residents received upper secondary or higher education, the prevalence of hypertension was significantly lower in the island group than in the rural group (41.4% vs. 56.1%, P=0.001), while it was similar between island and rural residents who received lower secondary or lower education (56.7% vs. 59.1%, P=0.062).

3.7. Awareness Rate, Treatment Rate, and Control Rate of Hypertension

As shown in Table 6, the weighted awareness rate (29.9% vs. 17.3%, P<0.001), treatment rate (51.4% vs. 28.5%, P<0.001), and control rate (36.3% vs. 24.0%, P=0.001) of hypertension were all significantly higher in island residents than those in rural residents.

Table 6: Awareness rate, treatment rate, and control rate of hypertension in island and rural residents.

No.
Island
No.
Rural
P value

(%, 95% CI)
(%, 95% CI)

Awareness rate
805/2649
29.9 (28.2-31.6)
848/5107
17.3 (16.3-18.3)
<0.001

Treatment rate
414/2649
15.4 (14.1-16.7)
246/5107
4.9 (4.4-5.6)
<0.001

    Within awareness group
414/805
51.4 (48.0-54.8)
246/848
28.5 (25.6-31.6)
<0.001

Control rate
147/2649
5.6 (4.8-6.5)
57/5107
1.2 (0.9-1.5)
<0.001

    Within treatment group
147/414
36.3 (31.8-40.9)
57/247
24.0 (19.0-29.7)
0.001

As shown in Table 7, calcium channel blockers were most frequently used both in island and in rural residents (42.1% vs. 22.8%, P<0.001). The survey results showed that most hypertensive patients took mono antihypertensive agent both in island and in rural areas. The proportion of combined antihypertensive medication is significantly higher in island residents than in rural residents (32.4% vs. 19.8%, P<0.001). In addition, 47.1% of island residents and 57.1% of rural residents took other nonstandard medications, mostly the Chinese herb medicine.

Table 7: Hypertensive mono medication status in island and rural residents.

Island
Rural
P value

Diuretic
8.7% (36/413)
19.1% (47/246)
<0.001

Beta-blocker
20.5% (85/414)
10.1% (25/247)
<0.001

CCB
42.1% (174/413)
22.8% (56/246)
<0.001

ACEi
14.8% (61/413)
17.9% (44/246)
0.290

ARB
4.3% (18/414)
1.6% (4/246)
0.060

Others
47.1% (195/414)
57.1% (141/247)
0.013

CCB: calcium channel blockers; ACEi: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blockers.

3.8. Independent Risk Factors of Hypertension in Island and Rural Residents

Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that older age, higher BMI, lower education level, and higher LDL-C and UA levels were independently associated with increased risk of having hypertension both in island and in rural residents (Tables 8 and 9). Female sex remained as independent risk factor of hypertension in island residents.

Table 8: Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors of hypertension in island residents.

Wald
P value
OR
95% CI for OR

Lower
Upper

Age (years)

    40-49
37.480
<0.001
Reference
-
-

    50-59
7.850
0.005
1.333
1.090
1.630

    60-69
15.434
<0.001
1.609
1.269
2.040

    70-79
12.024
0.001
1.687
1.255
2.268

    ≥80
22.161
<0.001
3.302
2.008
5.429

Male vs. female
9.077
0.003
1.353
1.111
1.647

BMI

    Underweight/normal
99.762
<0.001
Reference
-
-

    Overweight
19.956
<0.001
1.517
1.263
1.821

    Obesity
99.388
<0.001
3.299
2.609
4.172

Alcohol drinking
3.302
0.069
1.235
0.984
1.551

Education levels

    Lower secondary or lower vs. upper secondary or higher education
15.667
<0.001
1.805
1.347
2.419

TG (mmol/L)
2.993
0.084
1.104
0.987
1.234

LDL-C (mmol/L)
16.206
<0.001
1.295
1.142
1.469

Urea (mmol/L)
0.406
0.524
1.015
0.969
1.064

UA (umol/L)
25.202
0.001
1.003
1.002
1.004

Constant
103.128
0.001
0.052

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; TG: triglyceride; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; UA: uric acid.

Table 9: Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors of hypertension in rural residents.

Wald
P value
OR
95% CI for OR

Lower
Upper

Age (years)

    40-49
138.232
<0.001
Reference
-
-

    50-59
50.701
<0.001
1.821
1.544
2.147

    60-69
56.344
<0.001
2.186
1.782
2.681

    70-79
77.681
<0.001
3.521
2.662
4.659

    ≥80
29.730
<0.001
3.437
2.205
5.356

Male vs. female
0.084
0.772
1.026
0.864
1.217

BMI

    Underweight/normal
126.283
<0.001
Reference
-
-

    Overweight
67.953
<0.001
1.894
1.627
2.204

    Obesity
94.646
<0.001
3.346
2.623
4.268

Alcohol drinking
0.509
0.476
1.075
0.881
1.313

Education levels

    Lower secondary or lower vs. upper secondary or higher education
0.190
0.663
1.055
0.829
1.343

TG (mmol/L)
13.057
<0.001
1.190
1.083
1.308

LDL-C (mmol/L)
7.730
0.005
1.188
1.052
1.340

Urea (mmol/L)
7.042
0.008
1.062
1.016
1.109

UA (umol/L)
0.617
0.432
1.000
0.999
1.001

Constant
38.604
<0.001
0.200

OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; TG: triglyceride; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; UA; uric acid.

4. Discussion

The major findings of this study included that (1) the prevalence of hypertension adopting JNC 7 guideline was 61.9% in residents of Zhuanghe District (rural area) and it was significantly higher than in residents of Zhangzi Island (island area, 55.2%, P<0.001); (2) older age, higher BMI, lower education level, and higher LDL-C and UA levels were independently associated with increased risk of having hypertension both in island and in rural residents.

4.1. Prevalence and Independent Risk Factors of Hypertension in Surveyed Areas

According to a nationwide survey data from 2012 to 2015, weighted prevalence of hypertension in Chinese adult population aged ≥18 years was 23.2% [2]. Total prevalence of hypertension in Liaoning Province was 28.6% and 30.8% in urban residents and 26.2% in rural residents, respectively [2]. Our survey data showed that the weighted prevalence of hypertension in the island residents aged ≥ 40 years was 61.9% and 55.2% in the rural residents. This prevalence was also higher than nationwide prevalence in community-dwelling adults aged 35-75 years (44.7%) [15]. The awareness rate, treatment rate, and control rate of blood pressure were 46.5%, 41.1%, and 13.8%, respectively, in China. Our survey results showed that the awareness rate, treatment rate, and control rate of hypertension in two surveyed areas are significantly lower than national level. The weighted awareness rate in island residents was 29.9%, and 51.4% of them were receiving antihypertensive medications, and among treated patients, control rate was 36.3%. The awareness rate, treatment rate, and control rate in rural residents were 17.3%, 28.5%, and 24.0%, respectively, and were significantly lower than those in island residents. The following points might relate to the alarming hypertension epidemics both in island and in rural areas reported in this study.

The educational level might be responsible for the high prevalence of hypertension. Educational level in the two areas is under average national level; 91.4% population in island and 93.2% population in rural area are mainly junior middle school level or below [16]. Previous survey found that awareness, treatment, and control rates of hypertension were higher in urban residents compared with rural residents, and low education level was associated with lower rates of awareness, treatment, and control rats of hypertension. The slightly better education level in island residents might, therefore, be responsible for slightly better scenario on the higher awareness, medicine adherence, and control rates of hypertension in island residents as compared to the residents in rural area.

Aging is related to higher prevalence in these two surveyed areas, which is in line with the domestic related conclusions [17]. Besides above factors, higher BMI and higher LDL-C and UA levels are found to be the independent risk factors of hypertension in residents of the surveyed residents, in line with previous reports [18–22].

4.2. Treatment and Medication Status

The most common antihypertensive medications included CCB (nifedipine), beta-blocker, and ACEI in island residents and CCB, diuretic, and ACEI in rural residents. It is difficult for most patients to take mono antihypertensive drug to control the hypertension and reach individualized treatment. It is incompatible with the advocated principle of combining of antihypertensive drugs. The antihypertensive effect is not ideal; the island control rate of hypertension is only 36.3%, even 24.0% in the rural area. The slightly better control rate in island hypertensive residents might relate to the factor that the proportion of combined antihypertensive medication was significantly higher in island residents than in rural residents (32.4% vs. 19.8%, P<0.001). While the general unacceptable low hypertension control rate might be related to the widespread use of nonstandard medications, especially the Chinese herb medicine in surveyed hypertensive residents, we found that 47.1% of island residents and 57.1% of rural residents took nonstandard medications to treat their hypertension, mostly the Chinese herb medicine.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, our survey shows the epidemics of hypertension are extremely high in surveyed residents both in island and in rural areas of Dalian city, while awareness, treatment, and control rates of hypertension in these residents are much lower than the national level. Targeted strategies including health education and standardized hypertension treatment are warranted to reduce the hypertension burden in these areas.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Disclosure

A statement should be made that an earlier version of this manuscript has been presented as poster in Journal of Hypertension, which was only an abstract (doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000549258.06063.fb).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Qin Yu designed this study; Baiting Liu and Hainiang Liu helped in revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript; Rongmei Na, Baiting Liu, and Qianxiao Li took part in the whole investigation; Libo Chen, Wencheng Tu, Jiahui Hu analyzed data; Dong Cheng prepared the figures and Yalan Cao and Zhu Li revised the figures; Prof. Weiyi FANG and Prof. Ning ZHU Supervised the experimental process; and Qin YU drafted the manuscript. Baiting Liu and Hainiang Liu contributed equally to this work.

Funding

This study was supported by Scientific Research Fund from Dalian Science and Technology Bureau (grant number: 2007E21SF203; 2014E14SF149) and Grant to promote Dalian’s medical soft power from Dalian Municipal Government.

References

National Health and Family Planning Commission of People’s Republic of China, “Report on status of nutrition and chronic diseases in China,” Tech. Rep., 2015, http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/201506/6b4c0f873c174ace9f57f11fd4f6f8d9.shtml.

Z. Wang, Z. Chen, L. Zhang et al., “Status of hypertension in China: results from the China hypertension survey, 2012-2015,” Circulation, vol. 137, no. 22, pp. 2344–2356, 2018.

Y. Gao, G. Chen, H. Tian et al., “Prevalence of hypertension in China: a cross-sectional study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65938, 2013.

WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators, “The world health organization monica project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 1988.

S. Bothig, “WHO MONICA project: objectives and design,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 18, suppl. 1, no. 3, pp. S29–S37, 1989.

D. A. Calhoun, J. N. Booth, S. Oparil et al., “Determination of prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidities in a large, population-based cohort,” Hypertension, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 451–458, 2014.

C. Lenfant, A. V. Chobanian, D. W. Jones, and E. J. Roccella, “Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on the prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (JNC 7): resetting the hypertension sails,” Hypertension, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1178-1179, 2003.

C. Chen and F. C. Lu, “The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults,” Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 1–36, 2004.

S. Inoue, P. Zimmet, and S. Committee, “World Health Organization (WHO), Western Pacific Region/International Association for the Study of Obesity (ASO)/International Obesity TaskForce (IOTF). The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment,” in The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment, Health Communications Australia Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2000.

W. He, Q. Li, M. Yang et al., “Lower BMI cutoffs to define overweight and obesity in China,” Obesity, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 684–691, 2015.

A. Molarius, R. W. Parsons, A. J. Dobson et al., “Trends in cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s: findings from the WHO MONICA project,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 206–212, 2001.

World Health Organization, WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual: The WHO STEPwise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance/Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005, http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43376.

R. Liu, C. Han, D. Wu et al., “Prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout in mainland China from 2000 to 2014: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 762820, 12 pages, 2015.

Multidisciplinary Expert Task Force on Hyperuricemia and Related Diseases, “Chinese multidisciplinary expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of hyperuricemiaand related diseases,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 130, no. 20, pp. 2473–2488, 2017.

J. Lu, Y. Lu, X. Wang et al., “Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China: data from 1·7 million adults in a population-based screening study (China PEACE Million Persons Project),” The Lancet, vol. 390, no. 10112, pp. 2549–2558, 2017.

C. K. Chow, K. K. Teo, S. Rangarajan et al., “Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 310, no. 9, pp. 959–968, 2013.

World Health Organization, Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009, http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44203.

W. Johnson, F. T. Shaya, N. Khanna et al., “The Baltimore partnership to educate and achieve control of hypertension (The BPTEACH Trial): a randomized trial of the effect of education on improving blood pressure control in a largely African American population,” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 563–570, 2011.

K. Ferrier, M. Muhlmann, J. Baguet et al., “Intensive cholesterol reduction lowers blood pressure and large artery stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1020–1025, 2002.

L.-F. Cui, H.-J. Shi, S.-L. Wu et al., “Association of serum uric acid and risk of hypertension in adults: a prospective study of Kailuan Corporation cohort,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1103–1110, 2017.

World Heart Federation, Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors, World Heart Federation, 2018, http://www.world-heart-federation.org/cardiovascular-health/cardiovascular-disease-risk-factors/.

T. Liu, C. Zong, G. Liu et al., “Association of 24 hour urinary sodium, potassium and ALDH2rs671, MTHFRrs1801133 polymorphisms with blood pressure in isolated Zhangzi Island population,” International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 174–181, 2015.