International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 905981, 13 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/905981

Research Article

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Achiral Indole-Substituted Titanocene Dichloride Derivatives

Anthony Deally, Frauke Hackenberg, Grainne Lally, and Matthias Tacke

Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology (CSCB), UCD School of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Received 19 December 2011; Revised 15 March 2012; Accepted 15 March 2012

Academic Editor: Hussein El-Subbagh

Copyright © 2012 Anthony Deally et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Six new titanocene compounds have been isolated and characterised. These compounds were synthesised from their fulvene precursors using Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) followed by transmetallation with titanium tetrachloride to yield the corresponding titanocene dichloride derivatives. These complexes are bis-[((1-methyl-3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-2-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5a), bis-[((5-methoxy-1-methyl,3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-2-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5b), bis-[((1-methyl,3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-4-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5c), bis-[((5-bromo-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5d), bis-[((5-chloro-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5e), and bis-[((5-fluoro-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5f). All six titanocenes 5a–5f were tested for their cytotoxicity through MTT-based in vitro tests on CAKI-1 cell lines using DMSO and Soluphor P as solubilising agents in order to determine their IC₅₀ values. Titanocenes 5a–5f were found to have IC₅₀ values of 10 (±2), 21 (±3), 29 (±4), 140 (±6), and 450 (±10) μM when tested using DMSO.

1. Introduction

Titanium-based reagents have been investigated for their use as anticancer agents for more than a decade and have been shown to have significant potential against solid tumours. In fact, budotitane ([cis-diethoxybis(1-phenylbutane-1,3-dionato)titanium (IV)]) which was designed by following cisplatin models was the first nonplatinum drug to enter clinical trials in 1993 [1]. Following on from this work was the use of titanocene dichloride as an anticancer compound in the clinic. Pioneering work by Köpf and Köpf-Maier cannot be overlooked as it was them who first identified the antitumor potential of metallocene dihalides [2]. The compound looked very promising during its preclinical evaluation; studies showed that an Ehrlich ascites cure of 100% and Colon 38 adenocarcinoma inhibition was better than that of cisplatin [3]. However, the use of titanocene dichloride as a single agent in the clinic was not sufficiently promising to warrant further studies, and titanocene dichloride has been discontinued from further clinical trials [4, 5]. One of the main downfalls of titanocene dichloride being used in the clinic was the uncertainty regarding the composition of the biologically active titanium species responsible for the antitumor activity. The hydrolysis products of titanocene dichloride at physiological pH have hampered identification of the active species responsible for antitumour activity [6].

Over the past decade, there has been an effort to prevent cross-resistance and increase the cytotoxicity of titanocene dichloride. This can be done using two distinct approaches, by either replacing the substituent at the cyclopentadienyl (Cp) ring or by anion exchange of the chlorines [7, 8]. The more investigated of these two routes is the replacement of the Cp rings with more elaborately substituted analogues. Gao et al. have synthesised steroidal-functionalised titanocene dichloride derivatives which could target hormone-dependant cancers such as prostate and breast cancer [9]. Recently, an effort was made by Zagermann et al. to synthesise titanocenes containing targeting substituents so as to increase selective uptake into cancer cells, and therefore reducing toxicity [10]. Titanocenes containing peptide mimics were synthesised; however, incorporation of the tumour-targeting oligopeptide enkephalin proved difficult under the conditions used. Nevertheless, it has been shown that it is principally possible to attach peptides to the titanocene, which may pave the way to tumour specific targeted titanocenes [10]. Allen et al. overcame the solubility issues of titanocene dichloride by incorporation of alkyl ammonium salts to the Cp ring to produce water soluble derivatives of titanocene dichloride [11]. These compounds were shown to have significantly better activity and stability than their nonfunctionalized counterpart titanocene dichloride and gave a potent cytotoxic effect on cisplatin-resistant ovarian A2780 tumor cell lines. Titanocenes which have varying alkyl ammonium chains have also been reported, this study showed that titanocenes could have nanomolar activity when substituted with diethylaminomethyl pendant chains [12].

We recently reported the use of indoles for the synthesis of both chiral and achiral titanocenes [13, 14]. Chiral titanocenes were shown to have lower activity when compared to their achiral counterparts; however, the IC₅₀ values for these compounds may not be a true reflection of their cytotoxic activity as the chiral mixtures could not be separated. Following on from this work we decided to focus our attention on achiral titanocenes as these proved to be more active than their chiral counterparts. Substitution of the indole with a dimethylamino methyl arm and subsequent protonation of the amine with HCl gave the hydrochloride salt bis[(1-methyl-3-dimethylaminomethyl)indol-2-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride 1b. This compound was tested on the renal cell carcinoma cell line CAKI-1 to give an IC₅₀ value of 13 μM when tested without any solubilising agent, and 0.71 μM when tested with the solubilising agent soluphor P [15]. Also investigated by our group was varying the position of substitution of the indole to the Cp ring [16]. This study confirmed that substitution of the indole at position 4 warranted further investigation along with that of position 2.

Herein, we report the synthesis and cytotoxicity of novel achiral indole-substituted titanocene dichloride derivatives, which explore subtle structural changes to 1b.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis

5-Fluoro-1H-indole, 5-chloro-1H-indole, 5-bromo-1H-indole, 4-bromo-1H-indole, and 5-methoxy-1H-indole were available commercially and used as received. The methylation of indoles was achieved by N-alkylation with NaH and methyliodide [17]. Introduction of an aldehyde group into indoles 3a–3c (Figure 2) was achieved using n-BuLi followed by a DMF quench and subsequent workup in aq HCl [18]. As discussed earlier, we wished to incorporate the diethylaminomethyl moieties of benzyl-substituted titanocenes previously reported onto the indole, and this was done using the Mannich reaction [19]. Incorporation of the aldehyde group to position 3 of the indole was carried out using the Vilsmeier-Haack reaction with phosphorous oxychloride and DMF followed by a basic workup [20].

The synthesis of fulvenes 4a–4f (Figure 3) from aldehydes 3a–3f is based on a modified version of the Stone and Little method [21]. The aldehyde was reacted with freshly cracked cyclopentadiene in the presence of pyrrolidine as a base catalyst to yield the desired product in yields of 56–83%.

The exocyclic double bond in the fulvenes has increased polarity due to the inductive effects of its respective indole group. This allows for selective hydride insertion at this double bond and not at the diene component of the fulvenes. Hydride insertion was achieved using LiBEt₃H (Superhydride) in diethyl ether to obtain the correspondingly functionalised lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate. With the exception of 5f, these intermediates were then captured on a Schlenk glass frit, dried in vacuo, and redissolved in THF. Two equivalents of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate were then transmetallated with one equivalent of TiCl₄, resulting in the formation of one equivalent of the appropriately substituted titanocenes 5a–5f (Figure 4, Scheme 1) in yields of 30–85% and the byproduct lithium chloride, which was removed using celite. Repositioning of the Cp from position 2 of the indole to position 4 gave titanocenes in much higher yields (30% versus 85%) and higher purity. Titanocenes 5a–5c were then treated with 2 equivalents of HCl in DCM/diethyl ether to produce the water soluble dihydrochloride salt of their diethylaminomethyl functionalised parent.

Scheme 1: General reaction scheme for the synthesis of the fulvene precursors, and conversion to the corresponding indole-substituted titanocenes.

2.2. Cytotoxicity Studies

The cytotoxic effects of titanocenes 5a–5f were determined using in vitro cultured human renal cell carcinoma CAKI-1 cells. The cell line was obtained from the ATCC (American Tissue Cell Culture Collection) (HTB-47) in 2001 and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium containing 10% (v/v) FBS (foetal bovine serum), 1% (v/v) penicillin streptomycin, and 1% (v/v) L-glutamine. Cytotoxicities of the various titanocenes were determined using MTT-based assays.

This series described comprises of a range of titanocenes which vary greatly in their cytotoxicity. As can be seen in Table 1, Compounds 5a–5c have moderate to high activity on the CAKI-1 cell line (Figures 5–7) whereas compounds 5d–5f had little to no activity at all (Figure 8). This is very surprising as the introduction of halogens and in particular fluorine to medicinal compound classes has been shown to lead to an enhancement of the pharmaceutical properties in comparison to the parent compound in many cases [22]. In fact, it would be expected that the fluorine-substituted titanocene would be more cytotoxic than its bromine-substituted counterpart; however, this is not the case. A trend can be seen through substitution at position 5 of the indole ring, with more electron withdrawing groups having lower activity. This is more evident when compared with 1c (Figure 1), where an electron donating methoxy-substituent is present at position 5 of the indole. This has an effect on increasing the activity of the parent indole two-fold to give an IC₅₀ value of 11 μM, whereas incorporation of electron withdrawing groups renders the compound inactive (depicted in Figure 8).

Table 1: Cytotoxicities of titanocenes 5a–5f on CAKI-1 cells using DMSO-, medium-, and soluphor P-based formulations.

Compound
IC50 [μM]

(DMSO)
IC50 [μM]

(pure medium)
IC50 [μM]

(soluphor P)

5a
10 (±2)
38 (±3)
20 (±2)

5b
21 (±3)
75 (±5)
27 (±3)

5c
29 (±4)
13 (±2)
23 (±1)

5d
140 (±6)
Not measured
Not measured

5e
450 (±10)
Not measured
Not measured

5f
>500
Not measured
Not measured

Figure 1: Structures of titanocene dichloride and previously synthesised indole-substituted titanocenes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: The structures of aldehydes 3a–3c and the precursors to fulvenes 4a–4c.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 3: The structures of fulvenes 4a–4f.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 4: The structures of titanocenes 5a–5f.

Figure 5: Cytotoxicity studies of titanocenes 5a–5c against CAKI-1 cells using DMSO as cosolvent.

Figure 6: Cytotoxicity studies of titanocenes 5a–5c against CAKI-1 cells using soluphor P as cosolvent.

Figure 7: Cytotoxicity studies of titanocenes 5a–5c against CAKI-1 cells without a cosolvent.

Figure 8: Cytotoxicity studies of titanocenes 5d–5f against CAKI-1 cells using DMSO as co-solvent.

As can be seen in Figure 4, we decided to incorporate the substitution pattern of the diethylaminomethyl-substituted titanocene 1d with indole at position 3 to give titanocenes 5a and 5c as well as integrating this with the substitution pattern of 1b to give compound 5b. All three titanocenes were transformed to their hydrochloride salts to give them better solubility in biological medium. The compounds were tested with and without DMSO, which had a drastic effect on titanocene 5b from 27 μM (DMSO, Figure 5) to 75 μM (no DMSO, Figure 7). The same trend can be seen for compound 5a which is also bound to the Cp ring at position 2 of the indole ring. The opposite can be seen for compound 5c which is bound to the Cp ring at position 4 of the indole. In this titanocene, the addition of DMSO decreases the activity of the compound.

With the exception of compounds 5d–5f (which showed low activity), the titanocenes were further tested using the solubilising agent soluphor P (2-pyrrolidone) on the CAKI-1 cell line (Figure 6). Soluphor P is a low-molecular-weight cyclic amide which is water-miscible and liquid at room temperature with solubilising properties. The toxicity of soluphor P is attractively low; its oral LD50 in rats is 5000 mg/kg. In one study, it was concluded that it is a better co-solvent than commonly used pharmaceutical cosolvents such as propylene glycol or glycerine [23]. Compound 1a was tested on the CAKI-1 cell line using soluphor P as the solubilising agent, the result of which was a ten-fold increase in cytotoxicity from 8.2 μM to 0.71 μM when tested with DMSO.

Not surprisingly, the compounds had the same trend, when soluphor P was used as the solubilising agent. Evident in Figures 5 and 6, it can be seen that titanocenes 5a and 5b gained in potency when tested with soluphor P and DMSO, whereas compound 5c suffered a slight loss in activity when tested on the CAKI-1 cell line with these solubilising agents. However, it is more beneficial for the compound to be tested in the clinic without the need for a solubilising agent, and for this reason compound 5c is more advantageous for use in the clinic.

3. Conclusion and Outlook

Six new titanocenes, all similar in structure to previous compounds which exhibit promising cytotoxic activities, have been synthesised and characterised. The six compounds have been assessed for their cytotoxicities against the human kidney cancer cell line CAKI-1. Three of these compounds have been tested with DMSO, and three other compounds have been tested with DMSO, soluphor P, and without DMSO. The compounds display a range of activity, from inactive titanocenes substituted with electron withdrawing groups to compounds which have medium cytotoxicity (29 μM) when tested using DMSO and higher activity (14 μM) when tested with no solubilising agent. This is of course a huge advantage for use in the clinic. The incorporation of the indol-4-yl group onto the Cp ring has a profound effect on the activity of the titanocene. Both the parent compounds (N-((4-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylmethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine and titanocene dichloride) have much lower IC50 values when tested on their own with the indole component having no activity at all on the CAKI-1 cell line, whereas combining the two gives a 140 fold increase in activity to 14 μM. It can be envisaged that this bioconjugate is helping to deliver the active species of the molecule to the cancer cell. However as with all anticancer agents the effect of the compound in vitro can be remarkably different than those in vivo, and for this reason we hope to test compound 5c (referred to as Titanocene T from this paper on) in mice with xenografted CAKI-1 tumours in the near future.

4. Experimental

4.1. General Conditions

Titanium tetrachloride (1.0 M solution in toluene), Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H, 1.0 M solution in THF), and all chemicals were obtained commercially from Aldrich Chemical Co. and used without any further purification. 1H-indole-4-carbaldehyde, 1H-indole-5-carbaldehyde and 6-bromo-1H-indole were purchased from Apollo Scientific and used as received. Solvents were dried in a Grubbs apparatus and collected under an atmosphere of nitrogen prior to use. All spectroscopic data of titanocenes 5a–5c are of the hydrochloride salts of the parent compound. Manipulations of air and moisture sensitive compounds were done using standard Schlenk techniques, under a nitrogen atmosphere. NMR spectra were measured on a Varian 300, 400, or 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm and are referenced to TMS. IR spectra were recorded on a Varian 3100 FT-IR Excalibur Series employing a KBr disk. UV-Vis spectra were recorded on a Cary 50 Scan UV-Visible Spectrophotometer, (λ in nm; ε in dm³ mol−1 cm⁻¹). The formulations were sonicated using a VWR Ultrasonic Cleaner (45 kHz). MS data was collected on a quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Quattro Micro, Micromass/Water’s Corp., USA) and prepared as solutions of tetrahydrofuran (THF). CHN analysis was carried out with an Exeter-CE-440 elemental analyser, and Cl was determined by mercurimetric titrations.

4.2. MTT-Based Assay (MTT = 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium Bromide)

Preliminary in-vitro cell tests were performed on CAKI-1 cells to compare the cytotoxicity of the compounds presented in this work. The cell line was obtained from the ATCC (American Tissue Cell Culture Collection) (HTB-47) in 2001 and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium containing 10% (v/v) FBS (foetal bovine serum), 1% (v/v) penicillin streptomycin, and 1% (v/v) L-glutamine. The cytotoxicities of titanocenes 5a–5f were determined by an MTT-based assay [24].

Specifically, cells were seeded in 96-well plates containing 200 μL of medium and were incubated at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide for 24 h to allow for exponential growth. The compounds used for testing were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (70 μL DMSO) and diluted with medium to obtain stock solutions of 5 × 10−4 M in concentration. In the case of formulations using soluphor P, the compounds were dissolved in 50 μL soluphor P and sonicated at room temperature for 5 min. The cells were then treated with varying concentrations of the compounds and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. At that time, the solutions were removed from the wells, the cells were washed with PBS (phosphate buffer solution), and fresh medium was added to the wells. Following a recovery period of 24 h incubation at 37°C, individual wells were treated with 200 μL of a solution of MTT in medium (5 mg MTT per 11 mL medium). The cells were incubated for 3 h at 37°C. The medium was then removed, and the purple formazan crystals were dissolved in 200 μL DMSO per well. Absorbance was then measured at 540 nm by a Wallac-Victor (Multilabel HTS Counter) plate reader or a SpectraMax 190 Microplate Reader. Cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the absorbance recorded for control wells. The values used for the dose response curves of Figures 5, 6, 7, and 8 represent the values obtained from four consistent MTT-based assays for each compound tested, and Titanocene Y (IC₅₀ = 30 (±2) μM) was used as a positive control in each test.

4.3. Synthesis

1-Methyl-3-diethylaminomethylindole was prepared as per the literature in 80% yield and verified via ¹H NMR [25].

¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.71 (d,  , 1H), 7.28 (d,  , 1H), 7.24–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.06 (m, 1H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 3.78 (s, 2H), 3.76 (s, 3H), 2.56 (q,  , 5H), 1.09 (t,   , 7H).

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3a)

A solution of n-BuLi (5.0 mL, 12.5 mmol, and 2.5 M) was added to a Schlenk flask containing 1-methyl-3-diethylaminomethylindole (2a) (2.70 g, 12.5 mmol) dissolved in 30 mL THF at −78°C. The solution was warmed to 30°C and stirred at this temperature for 1 h, followed by an additional hour at room temperature. Then DMF (1.9 mL; 25 mmol) was added at −30°C and the reaction was allowed to come to room temperature over 24 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of 30 mL saturated ammonium chloride solution. This was extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2 × 50 mL) and brine (2 × 50 mL). The DCM was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and the solvent removed at reduced pressure to give a brown oil which was purified by column chromatography (silica) with DCM/pentane as the eluent to yield a brown oil in 85% yield (2.60 g; 10.6 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    10.38 (s, 1H, CHO), 7.88 (d,  Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t,   Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d,   Hz, 1H), 7.15 (t,   Hz, 1H), 4.07 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 3.99 (s, 2H, CH₂), 2.55 (q,   Hz, 4H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.06 (t,   Hz, 6H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    183.62 (CHO), 139.71, 132.48, 127.93, 127.11, 122.25, 120.51, 118.18, 110.34, 47.09 (CH₂), 47.00 (NCH₂CH₃), 31.98 (CH₃), 12.03 (NCH₂CH₃).

ES-MS: m/z 172 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3052, 2966, 2933, 2871, 2807, 1684, 1812, 1525, 1469, 1380, 1201, 1166, 1118, 1060, 883, 742.

N-((2-(Cyclopenta-2, 4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4a)

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3a) (2.5 g, 10 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (0.85 mL; 10 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (0.84 mL; 10 mmol), and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 20 h, acetic acid (1 mL) was added to the reaction, and the product was extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2 × 50 mL) and brine (2 × 50 mL). The DCM was dried over sodium sulphate, and the solvent removed at reduced pressure to give a red oil, which was purified by column chromatography (silica) with DCM as the eluent to yield a red oil in 83% yield. (2.51 g; 8.56 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.89 (t,  , 1H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.12 (t,  , 1H), 6.60 (d,  , 1H), 6.53 (d,  , 1H), 6.37 (d,  , 1H), 6.27 (d,  , 1H), 3.72 (s, 1H), 3.70 (s, 3H), 2.46 (q,  , 4H), 1.03–0.94 (m, 6H).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    139.50, 134.50, 132.26, 131.63, 128.44, 127.78, 126.89, 126.07, 125.65, 123.15, 122.04, 120.95, 120.29, 110.12, 48.12, 46.80, 31.77, 11.84.

   [nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 262 (13200), 388 (9500).

ES-MS: m/z 220 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2940, 2856, 2808, 2756, 1634, 1611, 1545, 1456, 1419, 1340, 1315, 1255, 1202, 1044, 1075, 1009, 889, 771, 761.

Dihydrochloride Derivative of bis-[((1-methyl-3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-2-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] titanium (IV) dichloride (5a)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (8.6 mL, 8.6 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10⁻² mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. N-((2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4a) (2.5 g; 8.6 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a yellow precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to white. The precipitate was filtered on to a frit. The white precipitate was dried briefly under reduced pressure and was transferred to a Schlenk flask under nitrogen. The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale yellow solution. Titanium tetrachloride (1.0 mL; 1.0 mmol) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark red solution. The dark red titanium solution was stirred for 16 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield an orange solid in 30% yield (1.00 g; 1.42 mmol). A portion of this solid (0.10 g; 0.14 mmol) was then dissolved in DCM (10 mL), an ethereal solution of hydrogen chloride (0.14 mL; 2 M) was added and a precipitate immediately formed. Diethyl ether (30 mL) was then added. After 15 min stirring, the solid was filtered to give a brown powder in 90% yield (0.10 g; 0.13 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO)    10.30 (s, 2H, NHCH₂CH₃), 7.77 (d,   Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d,   Hz, 2H), 7.17 (t,   Hz, 2H), 7.11 (t,   Hz, 2H), 6.77 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 6.45 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 4.47 (s, 4H,), 4.46 (s, 4H), 3.63 (s, 6H, NCH₃), 3.09 (s, 8H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.29 (t,  , 12H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO)    141.03, 136.98, 132.98, 127.90, 125.20 (C₅H₄), 122.09, 120.45, 119.03, 116.46 (C₅H₄), 110.37, 101.19, 46.90, 46.21 (NCH₂CH₃), 30.76 (NCH₃), 26.47, 9.18 (NCH₂CH₃).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3401, 2979, 2763, 1828, 1631, 1471, 1403, 1361, 1033, 894, 804, 746.

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 219 nm (ε 76,240), λ 282 nm (ε 23,666), λ 292 nm (ε 22,800), λ 400 nm (weak).

Microanalysis calculated for C₄₂H₅₈Cl₄N₄Ti (778.23 g/mol): Calcd. C, 62.38%; H, 7.23%; N, 6.93%; Found C, 62.56%; H, 7.98%; N, 6.41%.

5-Methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde was prepared as per published procedure in 62% yield and verified by ¹H NMR [26].

¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃)    9.84 (s, 1H), 7.27 (dd,  , 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (s, 1H), 7.12–7.07 (m, 2H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s, 3H).

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3b)

5-Methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (2b) (2.00 g, 10.5 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid (40 mL), diethylamine (2.2 mL; 21 mmol) was added, and the solution was cooled to 30°C. Formaldehyde (2.3 mL, 21 mmol, and 30% in H₂O) was added, and the solution was allowed to stand for 2 h. The mixture was then added to an ice/NaOH (100 mL; 9 M) solution and stirred vigorously for 10 min until a yellow precipitate formed. This was filtered, washed with water, and suction-dried to give a yellow solid in 72% yield (2.1 g; 7.7 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    10.31 (s, 1H, CHO), 7.24 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd,  , 2.5, 1H), 4.05 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.95 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.87 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 2.55 (q,  , 4H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.06 (t,  , 6H NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    183.05, 154.31, 135.25, 132.54, 127.00, 126.75, 118.85, 111.11, 101.68, 55.66 (CH₂), 47.03, 46.75 (NCH₂CH₃), 31.87(NCH₃), 11.91(NCH₂CH₃).

ES-MS: m/z 202 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2964, 2831, 1660, 1523, 1490, 1461, 1384, 1238, 1168, 1043, 883, 802, 754.

N-((2-(Cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4b)

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3b) (1.5 g; 5.5 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (0.46 mL; 5.5 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (0.45 mL; 5.5 mmol), and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 16 h, acetic acid (1 mL) was added the reaction, and the product was extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2 × 50 mL) and brine (2 × 50 mL). The DCM was dried over sodium sulphate, and the solvent removed at reduced pressure to give a red oil which was purified by column chromatography (silica) with DCM as the eluent to yield a red oil in 60% yield. (1.05 g; 3.26 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.39 (d,  , 1H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 7.27–7.26 (m,  , 1H), 6.95 (d,  , 1H), 6.61 (s, 1H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 6.37 (d,  , 1H), 6.27 (d,  , 1H), 4.05 (s, 2H), 3.95 (s, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 2.47 (q,  , 7H), 1.01 (t,  , 9H).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    146.77, 134.42, 131.47, 130.91, 128.74, 126.10, 125.68, 122.25, 118.85, 114.79, 113.75, 111.11, 110.17, 102.37, 55.82, 48.34, 46.61, 32.01, 11.91.

ES-MS: m/z 250 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

[nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 270 (14100), 390 (9800).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2933, 2852, 2809, 2762, 1624, 1600, 1553, 1449, 1419, 1340, 1315, 1255, 1202, 1075, 1044, 1075, 1009, 889, 771, 761.

Dihydrochloride Derivative of bis-[((5-methoxy-1-methyl,3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-2-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] Titanium (IV) Dichloride (5b)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (5.0 mL, 5.0 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10−2 mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. N-((2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-5-methoxy-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4b) (1.60 g; 5.00 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a yellow precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to white. The precipitate was filtered on to a frit. The white precipitate was dried briefly under reduced pressure and was transferred to a Schlenk flask under nitrogen. The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale yellow solution. Titanium tetrachloride (0.85 mL; 0.85 mmol) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark red solution. The dark red titanium solution was stirred for 8 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a brown solid in 79% yield (1.51 g; 1.97 mmol). A portion of this solid (0.10 g; 0.13 mmol) was then dissolved in DCM (10 mL), and an ethereal solution of hydrogen chloride (0.14 mL; 2 M) was added, and a precipitate immediately formed. Diethyl ether (30 mL) was then added. After 15 min stirring, the solid was filtered to give a brown powder in 90% yield (0.10 g; 0.13 mmol).

¹H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO)    10.13 (s, 2H, NH), 7.41 (m, 4H), 6.89 (s, 2H), 6.43 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 6.35 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 4.44 (s, 4H), 4.16 (s, 4H), 3.88 (s, 6H, OCH₃), 3.68 (s, 6H, NCH₃), 3.16 (s, 8H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.32 (d,  , 12H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (75 MHz, DMSO)    154.49, 148.64, 146.08, 141.85, 132.50 (C₅H₄), 132.04 (C₅H₄), 128.02, 111.45, 110.86, 101.48, 100.24, 56.04, 45.89, 43.49, 30.47 (NCH₃), 26.57 (C₅H₄CH₂), 9.05 (NCH₂CH₃).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3491, 2981, 2362, 1828, 1621, 1486, 1234, 1162, 1037, 890, 835, 687.

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 223 nm (ε 83,450), λ 295 nm (ε 28,400), λ 400 nm (weak).

Microanalysis calculated for C₄₄H₆₂Cl₄N₄O₂Ti (838.59 g/mol): C, 60.84%; H, 7.19%; N, 6.45%; found C, 60.12%; H, 7.42%; N, 6.34%.

N-((4-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (2c)

4-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-indole (1.52 g, 7.15 mmol) was dissolved in acetic acid (40 mL), dimethylamine (1.5 mL; 14.3 mmol) was added, and the solution was cooled to 30°C. Formaldehyde (1.8 mL, 14.3 mmol, and 30% in H₂O) was added, and the solution was allowed to stand for 2 h. The mixture was then added to an ice/NaOH (100 mL; 9 M) solution and stirred vigorously for 10 min until a yellow precipitate formed. This was filtered, washed with water, and suction-dried to give a yellow solid in 81% yield (1.71 g; 5.78 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.24 (d,  , 1H), 7.21 (d,  , 1H), 7.12 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.00 (t,  , 1H, H-6), 4.08 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.73 (s, 3H, NCH₃), 2.67 (q,  , 4H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.08 (t,  , 6H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    138.36, 129.57 (C-2), 128.29, 126.04, 123.45, 121.95 (C-6), 114.27, 108.42, 49.15 (CH₂), 46.70 (NCH₂CH₃), 32.91 (NCH₃), 11.76 (NCH₂CH₃).

ES-MS: m/z 222 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2966, 2929, 2869, 2807, 2360, 1658, 1550, 1454, 1415, 1313, 1195, 1066, 838, 765.

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole-4-carbaldehyde (3c)

A solution of n-BuLi (2.3 mL, 5.8 mmol, and 2.5 M) was added to a Schlenk flask containing N-((4-bromo-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (2c) (1.7 g; 5.8 mmol) dissolved in 30 mL THF at −78°C. The solution was warmed to 30°C and stirred at this temperature for 1 h, followed by an additional hour at room temperature. Then DMF (0.9 mL; 12 mmol) was added at −30°C, and the reaction was allowed to come to room temperature over 24 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of 30 mL saturated ammonium chloride solution. This was extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2 × 50 mL) and brine (2 × 50 mL). The DCM was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and the solvent removed at reduced pressure to give a brown oil. This was purified by acidic extraction to give a brown oil in 85% yield (1.41 g; 5.77 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    10.80 (s, 1H, CHO), 7.79 (d,  , 1H), 7.52 (d,  , 1H), 7.30 (t,  , 1H, H-6), 7.15 (s, 1H, H-2), 3.82 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.81 (d, 3H, NCH₃), 2.56 (q,  , 4H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.00 (t,  , 6H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    194.95 (CHO), 138.93, 131.67 (C-2), 130.27, 127.40, 121.03 (C-6), 120.19, 114.77, 113.25, 51.31(CH₂), 45.85 (NCH₂CH₃), 32.86 (NCH₃), 11.08 (NCH₂CH₃).

ES-MS: m/z 172 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2967, 2933, 2804, 1671, 1608, 1550, 1456, 1402, 1317, 1199, 1054, 929, 765.

N-((4-(Cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4c)

3-((Diethylamino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole-4-carbaldehyde (3c) (0.80 g; 3.3 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (0.27 mL; 3.3 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (0.27 mL; 3.3 mmol), and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 2 h, acetic acid (1 mL) was added the reaction, and the product was extracted with DCM (2 × 50 mL). The organic layers were combined and washed with H₂O (2 × 50 mL) and brine (2 × 50 mL). The DCM was dried over sodium sulphate, and the solvent removed at reduced pressure to give a red oil in 82% yield, which could be used without further purification. (0.80 g; 2.72 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    8.61 (s, 1H), 7.30 (dt,  , 6.6, 3H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 6.69 (d,  , 1H), 6.66–6.60 (m, 1H), 6.55 (d,  , 1H), 6.44 (d,  , 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.70–2.56 (m, 4H), 1.05 (t,  , 6H).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    144.77, 140.42, 136.47, 133.11, 129.74, 129.10, 128.78 126.58, 125.27, 122.84, 120.89, 120.56, 112.65, 109.31, 55.81 (CH₂), 46.62 (NCH₂CH₃), 32.21 (NCH₃), 11.93 (NCH₂CH₃).

ES-MS: m/z 220 [M–NCH₂CH₃]⁺.

[nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 280 (14500), 370 (8900).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2933, 2852, 2809, 2762, 1624, 1600, 1553, 1449, 1419, 1340, 1315, 1255, 1202, 1075, 1044, 1075, 1009, 889, 771, 761.

Dihydrochloride Derivative of bis-[((1-Methyl,3-diethylaminomethyl)indol-4-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] Titanium (IV) Dichloride (5c)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (3.6 mL, 3.6 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10−2 mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. N-((4-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)-N-ethylethanamine (4c) (1.06 g; 3.60 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a yellow precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to white. The precipitate was filtered on to a frit. The white precipitate was dried briefly under reduced pressure and was transferred to a Schlenk flask under nitrogen. The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale yellow solution. Titanium tetrachloride (0.45 mL; 0.45 mmol) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark red solution. The dark red titanium solution was stirred for 8 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a brown solid in 85% yield (1.08 g; 1.52 mmol). A portion of this solid (0.10 g; 0.14 mmol) was then dissolved in DCM (10 mL), and an ethereal solution of hydrogen chloride (0.14 mL; 2 M) was added, and a precipitate immediately formed. Diethyl ether (30 mL) was then added. After 15 min stirring, the solid was filtered to give a brown powder in 85% yield (0.090 g; 0.11 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, D₂O)    7.34 (s, 2H, H-2), 7.27 (d,  , 2H), 6.98 (t,  , 2H, H-6), 6.47 (d,  , 2H), 6.01 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 5.92 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 4.00 (s, 4H), 3.95 (s, 4H, CH₂), 3.66 (s, 6H, NCH₃), 3.09–2.90 (m,  , 8H, NCH₂CH₃), 1.11–0.99 (m, 12H, NCH₂CH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, D₂O)    137.71, 137.54, 133.57 (C-2), 129.53, 124.73, 122.48 (C-6), 122.19, 118.24 (C₅H₄), 115.81 (C₅H₄), 109.68, 101.46, 49.24 (CH₂), 46.10 (NCH₂CH₃), 33.27 (C₅H₄CH₂), 32.57 (NCH₃), 8.01 (NCH₂CH₃).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3401, 2975, 2942, 2682, 2653, 2360, 1625, 1542, 1452, 1421, 1265, 1211, 985, 838, 752.

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 225 nm (ε 78,400), λ 290 nm (ε 27,500), λ 300 nm (ε 21,100), λ 400 nm (weak).

Micro analysis calculated for C₄₂H₅₈Cl₄N₄Ti (778.23 g/mol): Calcd. C, 62.38%; H, 7.23%; N, 6.93%; Found C, 61.96%; H, 7.47%; N, 6.75%.

5-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde was prepared as per literature in 90% yield and verified via ¹H NMR [27].

¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃)    9.9 (s, 1H), 8.46 (s, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.44 (dd,  , 1H) 7.22 (d,   1H) d 3.86 (3H, s).

5-Bromo-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4d)

5-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3d) (2.0 g; 8.4 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (0.71 mL; 8.4 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (0.68 mL; 8.4 mmol), and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 16 h an orange solid precipitated, this was filtered to give a 60% yield. (1.31 g; 4.54 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.93 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.54 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.40–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.34 (s, 1H, C₅H₄CH), 7.20 (d,  , 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H, C₅H₄), 6.67–6.58 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 6.46 (s, 1H,), 6.42–6.34 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 3.84 (s, 3H, NCH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    141.07, 135.67, 133.67 (C₅H₄), 132.22(C-2), 129.77 (C₅H₄CH), 129.06, 128.85 (C₅H₄), 126.91 (C₅H₄), 125.75, 121.71 (C-4), 121.68, 119.26 (C₅H₄), 114.57, 112.85, 111.21, 33.51 (NCH₃).

[nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 275 (13000), 380 (9800).

ES-MS: m/z 207 [M–Br + H]⁻.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2923, 1612, 11527, 1454, 1390, 1338, 1292, 1240, 1078, 900.

Bis-[((5-bromo-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] Titanium (IV) Dichloride (5d)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (2.8 mL, 2.8 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10−2 mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. 5-Bromo-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4d) (0.80 g; 2.8 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a light green precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to yellow. The precipitate was filtered on to a frit. The precipitate was dried briefly under reduced pressure and was transferred to a Schlenk flask under nitrogen. The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale green solution. Titanium tetrachloride (1.1 mL, 1.1 mmol, and 1 M) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark brown solution. The solution was stirred for 8 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a dark green solid, which was washed with ether (50 mL) followed by pentane (50 mL) to give a green solid in 58% yield (0.56 g; 0.81 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.62 (s, 2H, H-4), 7.32–7.25 (m, 2H, H-6), 7.21–7.09 (m, 2H, H-7), 6.88 (s, 2H, H-2), 6.37–6.22 (m, 8H, C₅H₄), 4.15 (s, 4H, CH₂), 3.71 (s, 6H, NCH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    137.72, 135.67, 129.32, 128.91 (C-2), 124.53 (C-6), 122.09 (C₅H₄), 121.53 (C-4), 116.02 (C₅H₄), 112.46, 111.95, 110.89 (C-7), 33.01 (NCH₃), 26.43 (CH₂).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3114, 3012, 2925, 1475, 1435, 1375, 1214, 1045, 754.

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 219 nm (ε 80,100), λ 300 nm (ε 27,600), λ 410 nm (ε 4000).

Microanalysis calculated for C₃₀H₂₆Cl₂N₂Br₂Ti (693.12 g/mol): Calcd. C, 51.99%; H, 3.78%; N, 3.94%; Found C, 52.48%; H, 3.89%; N, 3.84%.

5-Chloro-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde was prepared as per the literature in 90% yield and verified via ¹H NMR [28].

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    9.93 (s, 1H), 8.28 (d,  , 1H), 7.65 (s, 1H), 7.32–7.18 (m, 2H), 3.85 (d,  , 3H).

5-Chloro-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4e)

5-Chloro-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3e) (2.60 g; 13.5 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (1.1 mL; 13.5 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (1.1 mL; 13.5 mmol) and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 16 h an orange solid precipitated, this was filtered to give a 56% yield. (1.81 g; 7.51 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.78 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.57 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.35 (s, 1H, C₅H₄CH), 7.30–7.21 (m, 2H), 6.79–6.69 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 6.69–6.60 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 6.50–6.43 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 6.43–6.34 (m, 1H, C₅H₄), 3.85 (s, 3H, NCH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    140.92, 135.38, 133.64 (C₅H₄), 132.43 (C-2), 129.19 (C₅H₄CH), 128.81, 127.04 (C₅H₄), 126.90 (C₅H₄), 123.18 (C-4), 119.26 (C₅H₄), 118.61, 112.89, 110.82, 109.98, 33.57 (NCH₃).

[nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 276 (12000), 370 (9000).

ES-MS: m/z 207 [M–Cl + H]⁻.

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3018, 2400, 1616, 1529, 1475, 1438, 1357, 1340, 1214, 1081, 902, 769.

Bis-[((5-chloro-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] Titanium (IV) Dichloride (5e)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (7.5 mL, 7.5 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10−2 mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. 5-Chloro-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4e) (1.80 g, 7.50 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a light green precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to yellow. The precipitate was filtered on to a frit. The precipitate was dried briefly under reduced pressure and was transferred to a Schlenk flask under nitrogen. The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale green solution. Titanium tetrachloride (2.4 mL, 2.4 mmol, and 1 M) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark brown solution. The solution was stirred for 8 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a dark green solid, which was washed with ether (50 mL) followed by pentane (50 mL) to give a green solid in 84% yield (1.88 g; 3.12 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.46 (s, 2H, H-4), 7.22–7.13 (m, 4H), 6.90 (s, 2H, H-2), 6.36–6.22 (m, 8H, C₅H₄), 4.15 (s, 4H, CH₂), 3.71 (s, 6H, NCH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    137.71, 135.41, 128.98 (C-2), 128.63, 124.90, 122.06 (C-6), 121.97 (C₅H₄), 118.43 (C-4), 115.94 (C₅H₄), 112.00, 110.40 (C-7), 32.90 (NCH₃), 26.42 (CH₂).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 3351, 3110, 2922, 1610, 1481, 1423, 1375, 1286, 1240, 1141, 1078, 1049, 833.

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 219 nm (ε 82,100), λ 310 nm (ε 26,100), λ 410 nm (ε 4500).

Microanalysis calculated for C₃₀H₂₆Cl₄N₂Ti (604.21 g/mol): Calcd. C, 59.63%; H, 4.34%; N, 4.64%; Found C, 58.12%; H, 4.40%; N, 4.24%.

5-Fluoro-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde was prepared as per the literature in 90% yield and verified via ¹H NMR [29].

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    9.95 (s, 1H), 7.97 (dd,  , 2.5, 1H), 7.68 (s, 1H), 7.29–7.19 (m, 1H), 7.08 (td,  , 2.5, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H).

5-Fluoro-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4f)

5-Fluoro-1-methyl-1H-indole-2-carbaldehyde (3f) (2.0 g; 8.4 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (70 mL). Freshly cracked cyclopentadiene (0.71 mL; 8.4 mmol) was added to the solution followed by pyrrolidine (0.68 mL; 8.4 mmol), and the colour gradually changed from yellow to red. After 16 h an orange solid precipitated, this was filtered to give a 60% yield (1.31 g; 4.54 mmol).

¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.59 (s, 1H, (C₅H₄CH)), 7.45 (d,  , 1H), 7.35 (s, 1H), 7.22–7.26 (m, 1H), 7.04 (t,  , 1H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 6.40 (s, 1H), 3.86 (s, 3H).

¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃)    161.03–159.62 (C-5), 133.46 (C₅H₄), 132.84 (C₅H₄CH), 130.42, 129.50, 128.63 (C₅H₄), 127.74, 127.63, 126.87 (C₅H₄), 119.26 (C₅H₄), 111.42–111.07, 110.64–110.51, 109.99, 104.41–104.09 (C-7), 33.62.

¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃)    −122.50 (td,  , 4.2, 1F).

ES-MS: m/z 207 [M–F + H]⁻.

[nm], (ε) [L mol−1 cm⁻¹], CHCl₃: 262 (15400), 390 (1100).

IR (KBr disk, cm⁻¹): 2933, 2852, 2809, 2762, 1624, 1600, 1553, 1449, 1419, 1340, 1315, 1255, 1202, 1075, 1044, 1075, 1009, 889, 771, 761.

Bis-[((5-fluoro-1-methyl)indol-3-yl)methylcyclopentadienyl] Titanium (IV) Dichloride (5f)

Super Hydride (LiBEt₃H) (12.0 mL, 12.0 mmol, and 1 M) in THF was concentrated by removal of the solvent by heating it to 60°C under reduced pressure of 10−2 mbar for 40 min and then to 90°C for 20 min in a Schlenk flask. 5-fluoro-2-(cyclopenta-2,4-dienylidenemethyl)-1-methyl-1H-indole (4f) (2.70 g; 12.0 mmol) was added to a Schlenk flask and dissolved in dry diethyl ether (100 mL) to give a red solution. The red fulvene solution was transferred to the Super Hydride solution via cannula. The solution was left to stir for 16 h, in which time a sticky dark green precipitate of the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate formed, and the solution had changed its colour from red to yellow. The solution was removed using a syringe and the intermediate was washed with ether (30 mL). The lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate was dissolved in dry THF (50 mL) to give a pale green solution. Titanium tetrachloride (2.4 mL, 2.4 mmol, and 1 M) was added to the lithium cyclopentadienide intermediate solution to give a dark green solution. The solution was stirred for 8 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced pressure. The remaining residue was extracted with DCM (100 mL) and filtered through celite to remove the remaining LiCl. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield a dark green solid which was washed with ether (50 mL) followed by pentane (50 mL) to give a green solid in 55% yield (1.90 g; 3.31 mmol).

¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃)    7.22–7.09 (m, 4H), 7.00–6.87 (m, 4H), 6.33 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 6.28 (s, 4H, C₅H₄), 4.14 (s, 4H, CH₂), 3.71 (s, 6H, NCH₃).

¹³C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl₃)    158.80–156.47 (C-5), 137.72, 133.66, 129.22, 128.21, 122.14 (C₅H₄), 115.94 (C₅H₄), 112.30–112.25, 110.17–110.05, 109.96–109.90, 103.98–103.75, 32.95 (NCH₃), 26.55 (CH₂).

¹⁹F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl₃)     (−125.09)–(−125.19) (m, 1F).

UV-Vis (CH₂Cl₂): λ 225 nm (ε 85,200), λ 310 nm (ε 26,100), λ 410 nm (ε 4000).

Microanalysis calculated for C₃₀H₂₆Cl₂N₂F₂Ti (571.31 g/mol): Calcd. C, 63.07%; H, 4.59%; N, 4.9%; Found C, 63.15%; H, 4.05%; N, 3.97%.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Higher Education Authority (HEA), the Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology (CSCB), and the UCD School of Chemistry and Chemical Biology for funding.

References

B. K. Keppler, C. Friesen, H. Vongerichten, and E. Vogel, “Budotitane, a new tumor-inhibiting titanium compound in preclinical and clinical development,” in Metal Complexes in Cancer Chemotherapy, B. K. Keppler, Ed., pp. 297–323, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993.

H. Köpf and P. Köpf-Maier, “Titanocene dichloride—the first metallocene with cancerostatic activity,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 477–478, 1979.

P. Kopf-Maier and H. Kopf, “Tumor inhibition by titanocene complexes. Activity against B16 melanoma and colon 38 carcinoma,” Arzneimittel-Forschung/Drug Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 532–534, 1987.

N. Kröger, U. R. Kleeberg, K. Mross, L. Edler, G. Saß, and D. K. Hossfeld, “Phase II clinical trial of titanocene dichloride in patients with metastatic breast cancer,” Onkologie, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2000.

G. Lümmen, H. Sperling, H. Luboldt, T. Otto, and H. Rübben, “Phase II trial of titanocene dichloride in advanced renal-cell carcinoma,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 415–417, 1998.

M. M. Harding, M. Prodigalidad, and M. J. Lynch, “Organometallic anticancer agents. 2. Aqueous chemistry and interaction of niobocene dichloride with nucleic acid constituents and amino acids,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 39, no. 25, pp. 5012–5016, 1996.

O. R. Allen, A. L. Gott, J. A. Hartley, J. M. Hartley, R. J. Knox, and P. C. McGowan, “Functionalised cyclopentadienyl titanium compounds as potential anticancer drugs,” Dalton Transactions, no. 43, pp. 5082–5090, 2007.

R. Meyer, S. Brink, C. E. J. Van Rensburg, G. K. Jooné, H. Görls, and S. Lotz, “Synthesis, characterization and antitumor properties of titanocene derivatives with thiophene containing ligands,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 690, no. 1, pp. 117–125, 2005.

L. M. Gao, J. L. Vera, J. Matta, and E. Meléndez, “Synthesis and cytotoxicity studies of steroid-functionalized titanocenes as potential anticancer drugs: sex steroids as potential vectors for titanocenes,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 851–859, 2010.

J. Zagermann, A. Deally, N. Metzler-Nolte, H. Müller-Bunz, D. Wallis, and M. Tacke, “Towards peptide-substituted titanocene anticancer drugs,” Polyhedron, vol. 30, pp. 2387–2390, 2011.

O. R. Allen, L. Croll, A. L. Gott, R. J. Knox, and P. C. McGowan, “Functionalized cyclopentadienyl titanium organometallic compounds as new antitumor drugs,” Organometallics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 288–292, 2004.

J. Claffey, H. Müller-Bunz, and M. Tacke, “Benzyl-substituted titanocene dichloride anticancer drugs: from lead to hit,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 695, no. 18, pp. 2105–2117, 2010.

C. Pampillón, J. Claffey, M. Hogan, K. Strohfeldt, and M. Tacke, “Synthesis and cytotoxicity studies of new dimethylamino-functionalised and indolyl-substituted titanocene anti-cancer drugs,” Transition Metal Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 434–441, 2007.

M. Hogan, B. Gleeson, and M. Tacke, “Synthesis and preliminary cytotoxicity studies of achiral indolyl-substituted titanocenes,” Organometallics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1032–1040, 2010.

M. Hogan, B. Gleeson, and M. Tacke, “The cytotoxicity of titanocene y against caki-1 cells: an in vitro formulation study,” Letters in Drug Design and Discovery, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 310–317, 2010.

A. Deally, B. Gleeson, H. Müller-Bunz, S. Patil, D. F. O'Shea, and M. Tacke, “Novel achiral indole-substituted titanocenes: synthesis and preliminary cytotoxicity studies,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 696, no. 5, pp. 1072–1083, 2011.

X. Luan, L. Wu, E. Drinkel, R. Mariz, M. Gatti, and R. Dorta, “Highly chemo- and enantioselective synthesis of 3-Allyl-3-aryl oxindoles via the direct palladium-catalyzed α-arylation of amides,” Organic Letters, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1912–1915, 2010.

M. P. Moyer, J. F. Shiurba, and H. Rapoport, “Metal-halogen exchange of bromoindoles. A route to substituted indoles,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 26, pp. 5106–5110, 1986.

H. R. Snyder and E. L. Eliel, “An alkylation with the methiodide of 1-methyl-3-dimethylaminomethylindole (1-methylgramine),” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1703–1705, 1948.

A. Vilsmeier and A. Haack, “The effect of phosphorus on halogen-alkyl formanilide. A new method for the preparation of secondary and tertiary p-alkylamino-benzaldehydes,” Chemische Berichte, vol. 60, pp. 119–122, 1927.

K. J. Stone and R. D. Little, “An exceptionally simple and efficient method for the preparation of a wide variety of fulvenes,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1849–1853, 1984.

J. P. Bégué and D. Bonnet-Delpon, “Recent advances (1995–2005) in fluorinated pharmaceuticals based on natural products,” Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 127, no. 8, pp. 992–1012, 2006.

P. Jain and S. H. Yalkowsky, “Solubilization of poorly soluble compounds using 2-pyrrolidone,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 342, no. 1-2, pp. 1–5, 2007.

T. Mosmann, “Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 55–63, 1983.

J. T. Li, S. F. Sun, and M. X. Sun, “Improved synthesis of 3-(dialkylaminomethyl)-indole in acetic acid aqueous solution under ultrasound irradiation,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 42–44, 2011.

D. L. Comins and M. O. Killpack, “Lithiation of heterocycles directed by α-amino alkoxides,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 104–109, 1987.

M. Chakrabarty, R. Basak, Y. Harigaya, and H. Takayanagi, “Reaction of 3/2-formylindoles with TOSMIC: formation of indolyloxazoles and stable indolyl primary enamines,” Tetrahedron, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1793–1801, 2005.

D. Carbonnelle, M. Lardic, A. Dassonville et al., “Synthetic N-pyridinyl(methyl)-indol-3-ylpropanamides as new potential immunosuppressive agents,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 686–693, 2007.

R. Tripathy, A. Ghose, J. Singh et al., “1,2,3-Thiadiazole substituted pyrazolones as potent KDR/VEGFR-2 kinase inhibitors,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1793–1798, 2007.