International Journal of MicrobiologyVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 806230, 6 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/806230

Research Article

The Lantibiotic Lacticin 3147 Prevents Systemic Spread of Staphylococcus aureus in a Murine Infection Model

Clare Piper,¹ Pat G. Casey,1,2 Colin Hill,1,2 Paul D. Cotter,2,3 and R. Paul Ross2,3

¹Department of Microbiology, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland²Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre, Cork, Ireland³Food Biosciences Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland

Received 12 August 2011; Accepted 3 October 2011

Academic Editor: John Tagg

Copyright © 2012 Clare Piper et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The objective of this study was to investigate the in vivo activity of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147 against the luminescent Staphylococcus aureus strain Xen 29 using a murine model. Female BALB/c mice (7 weeks old, 17 g) were divided into groups () and infected with the Xen 29 strain via the intraperitoneal route at a dose of  cfu/animal. After 1.5 hr, the animals were treated subcutaneously with doses of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; negative control) or lacticin 3147. Luminescent imaging was carried 3 and 5 hours postinfection. Mice were then sacrificed, and the levels of S. aureus Xen 29 in the liver, spleen, and kidneys were quantified. Notably, photoluminescence and culture-based analysis both revealed that lacticin 3147 successfully controlled the systemic spread of S. aureus in mice thus indicating that lacticin 3147 has potential as a chemotherapeutic agent for in vivo applications.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most significant bacterial pathogens and can cause diseases ranging from minor and surgical site infections [1] to potentially life-threatening endocarditis [2–4] and bacteraemia [5–8]. It is a particular problem in hospitals as a consequence of the emergence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant forms such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), vancomycin intermediate susceptibility S. aureus (VISA), and heterogenous VISA (hVISA). The prevalence of these antibiotic resistant forms means that the discovery of novel chemotherapeutic agents to combat these pathogens is of key importance [9, 10]. The lantibiotics (lanthionine-containing antibiotics [11]) are a group of posttranslationally modified antimicrobial peptides of which nisin and lacticin 3147 are among the most extensively investigated. A number of lantibiotics have been noted to exhibit potent antimicrobial activity against staphylococci of clinical relevance. In agar diffusion assays, the type I lantibiotics epidermin, Pep5, epicidin K7, and epilancin 280 display impressive levels of activity against coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) [12], and it has been suggested that their potential could be exploited to prevent the colonization of medical devices [12]. Nisin has also been shown on several occasions to possess significant anti-Staphylococcus activity. When tested against 20 MRSA strains, one study revealed that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of nisin A ranged between 1.5 and 16 mg/L [13], while a more recent investigation revealed MICs of 0.5–4.1 mg/L [14]. The in vitro activity of other forms of nisin (nisin F, Q, and Z) against MRSA has also recently been highlighted [15]. The in vivo activity of a number of lantibiotics against staphylococci has also been investigated. The effectiveness of the epidermin-like mutacin B-Ny266 was tested on mice infected by intraperitoneal (IP) injection with 3.1 × 10⁷ cfu of S. aureus Smith/mouse. Immediately after injection, mutacin B-Ny266 was administered, also via the IP route, at concentrations of 1–10 mg/kg of mouse and was found to be protective [16]. More recently, it has been established that microbisporicin, in addition to having potent in vitro activity ( μg/mL), effectively controls murine septicemia caused by S. aureus in female CD-1 mice (23–25 g). The mice were infected via the IP route with 1 × 10⁶ cfu of S. aureus Smith 819 ATCC 19636 in 0.5 mls gastric hog mucin. Microbisporicin was then administered intravenously or subcutaneously (SC) 10–15 mins after infection at final concentrations of 10–15 mg/L [17]. The effective dose 50 (ED₅₀) of microbisporicin was found to be 2.1 mg/kg regardless of whether it was administered via IV or SC. ED₅₀ values were determined on the bases of survival of the mice to the seventh day. Higher doses of microbisporicin (≥200 mg/kg) led to the survival of all animals treated and were nontoxic [16]. Nisin F effectively controlled the MRSA strain, S. aureus K, in immunocompromised Wistar rats following the introduction of 4 × 10⁵  S. aureus cells into the nostrils of the rats for 4 consecutive days before treating with 8192 arbitrary units (AU) of nisin F intranasally for the subsequent 4 days [18]. In contrast, however, when 1 x10⁸  S. aureus Xen 36 cells were injected intraperitoneally, the administration of a lower concentration of nisin F (640 AU) after 4 hours succeeded in inhibiting the growth of the pathogen for only 15 minutes after which time the pathogen reemerged [19]. Finally, short- and long-term in vivo studies with mersacidin established that this lantibiotic quite effectively inhibited MRSA introduced intranasally into immunocompromised (hydrocortisone-treated) BALB/C mice [20]. For the short term trial, the mice were infected on days 5, 7, and 9 with 3 × 10²–10⁴ cfu of the S. aureus strain. The mice were then treated intranasally with mersacidin (1.66 mg/kg per treatment) twice a day on days 10, 11, and 12. For the longer trial, the mice were challenged with S. aureus on days 5, 7, 9, 30, 32, and 34 and subsequently treated with mersacidin on days 35, 36, and 37. In both cases the mersacidin treatment successfully inhibited MRSA-induced rhinitis [20]. Notably, a comparison of the in vitro and in vivo activity of mersacidin against a number of MRSA strains indicates that mersacidin more effectively inhibits S. aureus in vivo [21].

Lacticin 3147 is the most extensively investigated of the two peptide lantibiotics. These peptides are active as a consequence of the synergistic activity of two lanthionine-containing peptides [22, 23]. Lacticin 3147 has been found to exhibit potent in vitro activity against a range of pathogenic bacteria including Clostridium difficile, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Propionibacterium acne, penicillin-resistant Pneumococcus, and Streptococcus mutans [14, 24–26] as well as pathogenic mycobacteria such as Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra [27]. Of greatest relevance to this study is the fact that lacticin 3147 possesses anti-Staphylococcus activity. The lantibiotic itself, when incorporated into a teat seal, protects against S. aureus-associated bovine mastitis [28, 29], while use of a lacticin 3147-producing Lactococcus lactis DPC 3251 within a teat dip inhibits S. aureus both in vitro and also in vivo [30]. The in vitro activity of lacticin 3147 against clinical MRSA isolates has also been established with MICs ranging from 1.9 to 15.4 mg/L [14].

Despite lacticin 3147 being one of the most extensively studied lantibiotics, its ability to control a systemic infection caused by S. aureus, or indeed any other pathogen, has not been investigated. Here we address this issue using BALB/c mice infected via the IP route with S. aureus Xen 29, a strain of methicillin sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) that has been genetically modified to express the Photorhabdus luminescens lux genes to facilitate in vivo imaging. The ability of subcutaneously administered lacticin 3147 to control infection was assessed by in vivo imaging and microbiological analysis of the organs of sacrificed animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antimicrobial Activity Assays

The in vitro activity of lacticin 3147 and vancomycin (employed as a positive control) against S. aureus Xen 29 was assessed through MIC determination assays carried out in triplicate as described previously [14] with purified lacticin 3147, prepared via HPLC, again as described previously [14]. Vancomycin was obtained from Sigma Aldrich.

2.2. Inoculum Preparation

S. aureus Xen 29 (derived from the parental pleural isolate S. aureus 12600; Xenogen Corporation, Almeda, CA) possesses a copy of the modified luxABCDE operon of P. luminescens integrated at a single site on the chromosome. S. aureus Xen 29 was cultured overnight in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth aerobically at 37°C from an isolated colony growing on BHI agar containing 200 μg/mL kanamycin. On the day of the trial, the overnight culture was subcultured (1 : 100 dilution) into fresh BHI and grown to log phase (OD600nm of 0.5). This culture was diluted to facilitate the ultimate administration of the culture in the form of a 1 × 10⁶ cfu/100 μL dose in 0.5% hog gastric mucin (Sigma Aldrich).

2.3. Mouse Peritonitis Model

Mice were fed a standard rodent diet ad libitum and all animal studies were approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee. 13 BALB/c female mice (7 weeks old, 15 g ± 2 g in weight) were divided into 3 groups (A, B, C; , 5, and 5, resp.). At T₀ mice in groups A–C received the 1 × 10⁶ cfu dose (100 μL volume) via the IP route in 0.5% gastic hog mucin (Sigma Aldrich). At T1.5 hrs, the mice in group C were administered lacticin 3147 (50.85 mg/kg of Ltnα and 43.8 mg/kg of Ltnβ, corresponding to 30.76 mM lacticin 3147/kg) in a single dose and a second dose at T3hrs (25.425 mg/kg Ltnα and 21.90 mg/kg Ltnβ; 15.382 mM lacticin 3147/kg). Vancomycin (50 mg/kg; 33.6 mM/kg) was administered at T1.5 hrs and at T3hrs to the mice in group B while the mice in group A received PBS (once) as a control. Both antimicrobials and PBS were adminisitered subcutaneously in 100 μL doses. In vivo imaging was carried out at two time points that is, 3 hours and 5 hours postinfection. Mice were anaesthetized for bioluminescent imaging via the inhalation of aerosolized isoflurane mixed with oxygen. The mice were then transferred to the IVIS chamber ventral side up, and luminescence was measured over a 3-to-5 mins exposure time. The imaging system measures the number of photons reaching each detector of the charged-couple device camera, and the IVIS software translates these data into false color images that display regions of intense luminescence with red, moderate luminescence in yellow and green and mild luminescence in blue. The images contained herein are photographic images with an overlay of bioluminescence that uses this computer-generated color scale [31]. The mice were euthanized approximately 6 hours postinfection. Liver, kidneys, and spleen were extracted. These organs were mechanically disrupted and serial dilutions made which were subsequently plated in 100 μL volumes on plates in order to enumerate the staphylococci present in each organ.

2.4. Quantification of Luminescence

Luminescent images were quantified with IVIS imaging software. The total flux (number of photons/s/cm²) was calculated by a user defined area (region of interest) covering the infection site. The flux was averaged across all mice from each respective group. The reduction in luminescence was quantified and represents a comparison with the luminescence from mice administered phosphate-buffered saline control at the same time point.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) of the luminescence at the final time point and bacterial counts for the mice were calculated for all groups. Differences in the bioluminescence and bacterial counts analyzed through a one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Holm-Sidak posttest (Sigma Stat, version 3.5).

3. Results/Discussion

3.1. Assessment of the In Vivo Activity of Lacticin 3147 against S. aureus Xen 29 Using a Murine Peritonitis Model

The ability of subcutaneously injected lacticin 3147 to control a systemic S. aureus infection following the introduction of the pathogen into the murine peritoneal cavity was investigated. This involved in vivo imaging to detect levels of light emitted by the pathogen within mice and through the postmortem microbiological analysis of organs. Negative and positive controls were employed in the form of mice treated with PBS and the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin, respectively. The target strain S. aureus Xen 29 is a methicillin sensitive isolate which has been employed previously to facilitate an investigation of acute in vivo infections [32–36]. Prior to commencement of the study, the in vitro sensitivity of Xen 29 to lacticin 3147 was assessed. The corresponding MIC values were 1.013 mg/L and 19.1 mg/L for vancomycin and lacticin 3147, respectively (Table 1). For in vivo studies, mice received a dose of 1 × 10⁶ cfu and, 1.5 hrs postinfection, were administered lacticin 3147 (50.85 mg/kg of Ltnα and 43.8 mg/kg of Ltnβ), vancomycin (50 mg/kg), or PBS. At T3hrs, the mice were subject to IVIS imaging, and second doses of lacticin 3147 (25.425 mg/kg and 21.90 mg/kg) and vancomycin (50 mg/kg) were administered to the relevant mice. IVIS analysis of the progression of the S. aureus Xen 29 infection showed that the pathogen spreads systemically and eventually also occupies the thoracic cavity in mice injected with PBS 5 hrs (T5hrs) after injection of the pathogen. A significant () reduction in the RLU measurements corresponding to the thoracic region of the lacticin 3147 treated group was evident when compared to that of the PBS (negative) control group (Figure 1) at this time point highlighting the ability of the lantibiotic to prevent systemic spread of the S. aureus Xen 29 infection. In contrast, lacticin 3147 does not significantly reduce RLU values corresponding to the peritoneal cavity relative to the control. It may be that lacticin 3147 is deficient in penetrating the peritoneal cavity (Figure 1). To further ascertain lacticin 3147 efficacy, culture-based analysis of staphylococcal levels in the organs was determined after the mice were sacrificed. This analysis further highlighted the success of lacticin 3147 in controlling systemic infection. Lacticin 3147 treatment resulted in a significant reduction ( in all cases; Figure 1) in pathogen numbers in the liver, spleen, and kidneys of the mice treated relative to the PBS-treated controls (Figure 1).

Table 1: The standard deviation in all cases is 0 reflecting identical triplicate results.

S. aureus Xen 29
MIC (mg/L)

Vancomycin
1.013

Lacticin 3147
19.1

Figure 1: Impact of lacticin 3147 on the systemic spread of S. aureus Xen 29 in mice. Images are of representative mice from each group 3 and 5 hours postinfection. Values (i.e., RLU measurements and cfu/mL of organs) represent averages of data collected at T5hrs, and values refer to the significance of differences between the treated and untreated equivalents at T5hrs as determined by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Holm-Sidak posttest. The imaging system depicts false-color images representative of different levels of total flux. False color imaging represents intense luminescence in red, moderate luminescence in green, and low level luminescence in blue/purple.

As expected, vancomycin brought about a significant reduction in S. aureus levels relative to the PBS-treated controls as determined by both bioimaging and culture-based analysis. Notably, numbers of S. aureus in the spleens of lacticin 3147- and vancomycin-treated mice were statistically indifferent. However, vancomycin treatment more successfully lowered S. aureus numbers in the liver and kidneys. While both lacticin 3147 and vancomycin bind lipid II, [10, 37, 38] differences exist with respect to their mechanism of action. Vancomycin binds to the C-terminal D-Ala-D-Ala motif of the pentapeptide of lipid II [10] whereas, on the basis of similarities between Ltnα and mersacidin, it is proposed that lacticin 3147 binds to the sugar phosphate head group of lipid II [39]. Furthermore, lacticin 3147 is also capable of forming pores in the membranes of target cells [37, 38]. It should be noted that while similar mg/kg doses of lacticin 3147 and vancomycin were employed in this study, our in vitro investigations established that vancomycin is 19 times more potent than lacticin 3147 against Xen29 (MIC values; 1.013 mg/L and 19.1 mg/L of vancomycin and lacticin 3147, resp.). Thus the dose of vancomycin administered in vivo corresponded to 100-fold that of the in vitro MIC whereas lacticin 3147 was administered at a level 8-fold greater than its in vitro MIC. This may explain the enhanced ability of vancomycin with respect to clearance of Xen 29 from the peritoneal cavity. This is the first occasion upon which the impact of lacticin 3147 against a systemic infection has been assessed and thus it is also the first instance of its administration subcutaneously. It may be that lacticin 3147 cannot travel to the peritoneum to eradicate the infection but can prevent the spread of infection throughout the blood stream. As stated previously, mersacidin has successfully been shown to inhibit a systemic MRSA infection in mice when administered via the subcutaneous route [20]. However, mersacidin is a one-component lantibiotic and is also globular which may provide facile delivery through the skin. It, like vancomycin, is quite a small peptide with a molecular weight of 1, 825 Da [40]. Lacticin 3147 consists of 2 peptides with molecular weights of 3305 Da (Ltnα) and 2847 Da (Ltnβ), and it may be that the larger size of the individual peptides or a specific difficulty relating the transport of one of the components to the peritoneal cavity may be an issue. Mutacin B-Ny266 has also been shown to protect against S. aureus in the peritoneum, but this lantibiotic was administered intraperitoneally, and thus transfer to the site of infection was not an issue [16].

3.2. Conclusion

In conclusion, here we have provided evidence that lacticin 3147 could be employed to treat systemic infections. Both culture- and bioluminescence-based analyses reveal that the lantibiotic significantly reduces numbers of the S. aureus Xen29 relative to the negative control by preventing the dissemination of the pathogen. Although these results are more promising than those described when nisin F was employed in a similar manner (19), differences with respect to the strains of S. aureus employed, concentrations of lantibiotic, and other factors mean that a direct comparison of outcomes is not possible. While further investigations are required, over longer periods of time, to more extensively assess the clinical potential of lacticin 3147, it is worth noting that lacticin 3147 possesses many physicochemical properties that favour its in vivo application. These include excellent activity over a broad pH range, especially at physiological pH (pH 7), the absence of cytotoxicity towards eukaryotic cells [41], its broad spectrum of activity at nanomolar concentrations [42], its alternative mode of action [38], and the presence of (methyl)lanthionine bridges that confer structural rigidity to lantibiotics and reduce proteolytic attack [43]. These properties, accompanied by its ability to inhibit a systemic S. aureus infection, make lacticin 3147 a promising candidate for potential applications in human medicine.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Ian Monk for helpful discussions. This research was funded by a Health Research Board (HRB) Ireland Research Project Grant and by the Irish Government under the National Development Plan, through a Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Award to C. Hill, R. Paul Ross, and P. Cotter (06/IN.1/B98).

References

R. P. Rennie, R. N. Jones, and A. H. Mutnick, “Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue infections: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 2000),” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 287–293, 2003.

A. Tuǧcu, Ö. Yildirimtürk, C. Baytaroǧlu et al., “Clinical spectrum, presentation, and risk factors for mortality in infective endocarditis: a review of 68 cases at a tertiary care center in Turkey,” Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2009.

A. Nomura, F. Omata, and K. Furukawa, “Risk factors of mid-term mortality of patients with infective endocarditis,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1355–1360, 2010.

A. M. Valente, R. Jain, M. Scheurer et al., “Frequency of infective endocarditis among infants and children with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia,” Pediatrics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. e15–e19, 2005.

J. M. Boyce, B. Cookson, K. Christiansen et al., “Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 653–663, 2005.

S. E. Cosgrove, G. Sakoulas, E. N. Perencevich, M. J. Schwaber, A. W. Karchmer, and Y. Carmeli, “Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53–59, 2003.

D. Pittet, D. Tarara, and R. P. Wenzel, “Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 271, no. 20, pp. 1598–1601, 1994.

M. J. Richards, J. R. Edwards, D. H. Culver, and R. P. Gaynes, “Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States,” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 510–515, 2000.

L. Cui, A. Iwamoto, J. Q. Lian et al., “Novel mechanism of antibiotic resistance originating in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 428–438, 2006.

K. Hiramatsu, “Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 135–150, 1998.

N. Schnell, K. D. Entian, U. Schneider et al., “Prepeptide sequence of epidermin, a ribosomally synthesized antibiotic with four sulphide-rings,” Nature, vol. 333, no. 6170, pp. 276–278, 1988.

M. B. C. Fontana, M. D. C. Freire De Bastos, and A. Brandelli, “Bacteriocins Pep5 and epidermin inhibit Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to catheters,” Current Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 350–353, 2006.

W. Brumfitt, M. R. J. Salton, and J. M. T. Hamilton-Miller, “Nisin, alone and combined with peptidoglycan-modulating antibiotics: activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 731–734, 2002.

C. Piper, L. A. Draper, P. D. Cotter, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill, “A comparison of the activities of lacticin 3147 and nisin against drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus species,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 546–551, 2009.

C. Piper, C. Hill, P. D. Cotter, and R. P. Ross, “Bioengineering of a Nisin A-producing Lactococcus lactis to create isogenic strains producing the natural variants Nisin F, Q and Z,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 375–382, 2011.

M. Mota-Meira, H. Morency, and M. C. Lavoie, “In vivo activity of mutacin B-Ny266,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 869–871, 2005.

F. Castiglione, A. Lazzarini, L. Carrano et al., “Determining the structure and mode of action of microbisporicin, a potent lantibiotic active against multiresistant pathogens,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 22–31, 2008.

M. De Kwaadsteniet, K. T. Doeschate, and L. M. T. Dicks, “Nisin F in the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 2009.

A. M. Brand, M. de Kwaadsteniet, and L. M. T. Dicks, “The ability of nisin F to control Staphylococcus aureus infection in the peritoneal cavity, as studied in mice,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 645–649, 2010.

D. Kruszewska, H. G. Sahl, G. Bierbaum, U. Pag, S. O. Hynes, and A. Ljungh, “Mersacidin eradicates methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a mouse rhinitis model,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 648–653, 2004.

S. Chatterjee, D. K. Chatterjee, R. H. Jani et al., “Mersacidin, a new antibiotic from bacillus in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 839–845, 1992.

E. M. Lawton, R. P. Ross, C. Hill, and P. D. Cotter, “Two-peptide lantibiotics: a medical perspective,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1236–1247, 2007.

S. Suda, P. D. Cotter, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross, “Lacticin 3147—biosynthesis, molecular analysis, immunity, bioengineering and applications,” Current Protein and Peptide Science. In press

M. C. Rea, E. Clayton, P. M. O'Connor et al., “Antimicrobial activity of lacticin 3147 against clinical Clostridium difficile strains,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 940–946, 2007.

M. Galvin, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross, “Lacticin 3147 displays activity in buffer against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens which appear insensitive in standard plate assays,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 355–358, 1999.

M. C. Rea, A. Dobson, O. O'Sullivan et al., “Effect of broad- and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials on Clostridium difficile and microbial diversity in a model of the distal colon,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, supplement 1, pp. 4639–4644, 2011.

J. Carroll, L. A. Draper, P. M. O'Connor et al., “Comparison of the activities of the lantibiotics nisin and lacticin 3147 against clinically significant mycobacteria,” International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 132–136, 2010.

D. P. Twomey, A. I. Wheelock, J. Flynn, W. J. Meaney, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross, “Protection against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in dairy cows using a bismuth-based teat seal containing the bacteriocin, Lacticin 3147,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 1981–1988, 2000.

M. P. Ryan, W. J. Meaney, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill, “Evaluation of lacticin 3147 and a teat seal containing this bacteriocin for inhibition of mastitis pathogens,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2287–2290, 1998.

K. Klostermann, F. Crispie, J. Flynn, W. J. Meaney, R. Paul Ross, and C. Hill, “Efficacy of a teat dip containing the bacteriocin lacticin 3147 to eliminate Gram-positive pathogens associated with bovine mastitis,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 231–238, 2010.

L. I. Mortin, T. Li, A. D. G. Van Praagh, S. Zhang, X. X. Zhang, and J. D. Alder, “Rapid bactericidal activity of daptomycin against methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis in mice as measured with bioluminescent bacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1787–1794, 2007.

C. H. Contag, P. R. Contag, J. I. Mullins, S. D. Spilman, and D. A. Benaron, “Photonic detection of bacterial pathogens in living hosts,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 593–603, 1995.

C. H. Contag, S. D. Spilman, P. R. Contag et al., “Visualizing gene expression in living mammals using a bioluminescent reporter,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 523–531, 1997.

K. P. Francis, D. Joh, C. Bellinger-Kawahara, M. J. Hawkinson, T. F. Purchio, and P. R. Contag, “Monitoring bioluminescent Staphylococcus aureus infections in living mice using a novel luxABCDE construct,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3594–3600, 2000.

M. J. Hickey, T. M. Arain, R. M. Shawar et al., “Luciferase in vivo expression technology: use of recombinant mycobacterial reporter strains to evaluate antimycobacterial activity in mice,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 400–407, 1996.

H. L. Rocchetta, C. J. Boylan, J. W. Foley et al., “Validation of a noninvasive, real-time imaging technology using bioluminescent Escherichia coli in the neutropenic mouse thigh model of infection,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 129–137, 2001.

E. Breukink, “A lesson in efficient killing from two-component lantibiotics,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 271–273, 2006.

I. Wiedemann, T. Böttiger, R. R. Bonelli et al., “The mode of action of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147—a complex mechanism involving specific interaction of two peptides and the cell wall precursor lipid II,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 285–296, 2006.

H. Brötz, G. Bierbaum, K. Leopold, P. E. Reynolds, and H. G. Sahl, “The lantibiotic mersacidin inhibits peptidoglycan synthesis by targeting lipid II,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 154–160, 1998.

S. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee, S. J. Lad et al., “Mersacidin, a new antibiotic from bacillus fermentation, isolation, purification and chemical characterization,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 832–838, 1992.

M. P. Ryan, O. McAuliffe, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill, “Heterologous expression of lacticin 3147 in Enterococcus faecalis: comparison of biological activity with cytolysin,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 71–77, 2001.

S. M. Morgan, P. M. O'Connor, P. D. Cotter, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill, “Sequential actions of the two component peptides of the lantibiotic lacticin 3147 explain its antimicrobial activity at nanomolar concentrations,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 2606–2611, 2005.

S. Suda, A. Westerbeek, P. M. O'Connor, R. P. Ross, C. Hill, and P. D. Cotter, “Effect of bioengineering lacticin 3147 lanthionine bridges on specific activity and resistance to heat and proteases,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1151–1160, 2010.