Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a reflexive and strictly convex Banach
space E with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, ℱ={T(h):h≥0} a generalized asymptotically
nonexpansive self-mapping semigroup of K, and f:K→K a fixed contractive mapping
with contractive coefficient β∈(0,1). We prove that the following implicit and modified implicit
viscosity iterative schemes {xn} defined by xn=αnf(xn)+(1−αn)T(tn)xn and xn=αnyn+(1−αn)T(tn)xn,yn=βnf(xn−1)+(1−βn)xn−1 strongly converge to p∈F as n→∞ and p is the unique solution to the following variational
inequality: 〈f(p)−p,j(y−p)〉≤0 for all y∈F.
1. Introduction
Let C be a closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H and T a nonexpansive mapping from C into itself. We denote by F(T) the set of fixed points of T.
Let F(T) be nonempty and u an element of C.
For each t with 0<t<1,
let xt∈C be the unique fixed point of the contraction x↦tu+(1−t)Tx. Browder [1] showed that {xt} defined by xt=tu+(1−t)Txt converges strongly to the element of F(T) which is nearest to u in F(T) as t→0.
In 2004, for a contraction f:C→C and a nonexpansive mapping T:C→C,
Xu [2] proposed the following viscosity approximation method in Banach space:xt=tf(xt)+(1−t)Txt,t∈(0,1),t→0,and Song and Xu [3] studied the
convergence of the following implicit viscosity iterative scheme:xn=αnf(xn)+(1−αn)T(tn)xn,where {αn}⊂(0,1).
On the other hand, for a fixed Lipschitz strongly
pseudocontractive mapping f and a continuous pseudocontractive mapping T,
Song and Chen [4] proposed the following motivated implicit viscosity iterative
scheme:xn=αnyn+(1−αn)Txn,yn=βnf(xn−1)+(1−βn)xn−1.
In this paper, we will still study the implicit
viscosity iterative scheme (1.2) and propose the following iterative scheme:xn=αnyn+(1−αn)T(tn)xn,yn=βnf(xn−1)+(1−βn)xn−1,where {T(h):h≥0} is a generalized asymptotically nonexpansive
self-mappings semigroup and f a fixed contractive mapping with contractive
coefficient β∈(0,1).
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this
paper, we assume that E is a Banach space and K a nonempty closed convex subset of E.
Let E* be a dual space of E, J:E→2E* the normalized duality mapping defined byJ(x)={f∈E*,〈x,f〉=∥x∥⋅∥f∥,∥x∥=∥f∥},where 〈⋅,⋅〉 denotes the generalized duality pairing.
Definition 2.1 (see {[5]}).
A mapping T:E→E is said to be
total asymptotically nonexpansive if there exist nonnegative real sequences {kn(1)} and {kn(2)},n>0,
with kn(1) and kn(2)→0 as n→∞,
and strictly increasing and continuous functions ϕ:R+→R+ with ϕ(0)=0 such that∥Tnx−Tny∥≤∥x−y∥+kn(1)ϕ(∥x−y∥)+kn(2)∀x,y∈K.
Remark 2.2.
If ϕ(λ)=λ,
the total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping coincides with generalized
asymptotically nonexpansive mapping. In addition, for all n∈ℕ,
if kn(2)=0,
then generalized asymptotically nonexpansive mapping coincide with
asymptotically nonexpansive mapping; if kn(1)=0,kn(2)=max{0,pn},
where pn:=supx,y∈K(∥Tnx−Tny∥−∥x−y∥),
then generalized asymptotically nonexpansive mapping coincide with
asymptotically nonexpansive mapping in the intermediate sense; if kn(1)=0 and kn(2)=0,
then we obtain from (2.2) the class of nonexpansive mapping.
Remark 2.3.
In [5], for
the total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping, the authors assume that there
exist M,M*>0 such that ϕ(λ)≤M*λ for all λ≥M,
so for M0=max{ϕ(M),M*}, ϕ(λ)≤M0(1+λ) for all λ≥0,
then the total asymptotically nonexpansive mapping studied by [5] coincides
with generalized asymptotically nonexpansive mapping.
A (one-parameter) generalized asymptotically
nonexpansive semigroup is a family ℱ={T(h):h≥0} of self-mapping of K such that
T(0)x=x for x∈K;
T(s+t)x=T(s)T(t)x for t,s≥0 and x∈K;
limt→0T(t)x=x for x∈K;
for each h≥0,T(h) is generalized asymptotically nonexpansive,
that is,∥T(h)x−T(h)y∥≤(1+kh(1))∥x−y∥+kh(2)∀x,y∈K.
We will denote by F the common fixed point set of ℱ,
that is,F:=Fix(ℱ)={x∈K:T(h)x=x,h≥0}=⋂h≥0Fix(T(h)).
Definition 2.4.
A Banach space E is said to be strictly convex if ∥x+y∥/2<1 for ∥x∥=∥y∥=1 and x≠y.
Definition 2.5.
Let U={x∈E:∥x∥=1},
the norm of E is said to be uniformly Ga^teaux differentiable, if for each y∈U, limt→0((∥x+ty∥−∥x∥)/t) exists uniformly for x∈U.
Definition 2.6.
Let μ be a continuous liner functional on l∞ and let (a0,a1,…)∈l∞.
One writes μn(an) instead of μ((a0,a1,…)). One calls μ a Banach limit when μ satisfies ∥μ∥=μn(1)=1 and μn(an+1)=μn(an) for each (a0,a1,…)∈l∞.
For a Banach limit μ,
one knows that lim¯n→∞an≤μn(an)≤lim¯n→∞an for every a=(a0,a1,…)∈l∞.
So if a=(a0,a1,…)∈l∞,b=(b0,b1,…)∈l∞ and an−bn→0 as n→∞,
one has μn(an)=μn(bn).
Definition 2.7.
Let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach
space E, ℱ={T(h):h≥0} a continuous operator semigroup on K.
Then ℱ is said to be uniformly asymptotically regular
(in short, u.a.r.) on K if for all h≥0 and any bounded subset C of K, limt→∞supx∈C∥T(h)(T(t)x)−T(t)x∥=0.
Lemma 2.8 (see {[6]}).
Let E be a Banach space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, then the normalized
duality mapping J:E→2E* defined by (2.1) is single-valued and
uniformly continuous from the norm topology of E to the weak* topology of E* on each bounded subset of E.
The single-valued normalized duality mapping is
denoted by j.
Lemma 2.9.
Let E be a reflexive and strictly convex Banach
space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, K a nonempty closed convex subset of E.
Suppose that {xn} is a bounded sequence in K, {T(h):h≥0} a continuous generalized asymptotically
nonexpansive semigroup from K into itself such that limn→∞∥xn−T(h)xn∥=0 for all h≥0. Define the setK*={x∈K:μn∥xn−x∥2=miny∈Kμn∥xn−y∥2}.If F≠∅,
then K*∩F≠∅.
Proof.
Set g(y)=μn∥xn−y∥2,
then g(y) is a convex and continuous function, and g(y)→∞ as ∥y∥→∞.
Using [7, Theorem 1.3.11], there exists x∈K such that g(x)=infy∈Kg(y) by the reflexivity of E,
that is, K* is nonempty. Clearly, K* is closed convex by the convexity and
continuity of g(y).
Since limn→∞∥xn−T(h)xn∥=0,limh→∞kh(i)=0(i=1,2), and g(y) is continuous for all z∈K*, we haveg(limh→∞T(h)z)=limh→∞g(T(h)z)=limh→∞μn∥xn−T(h)z∥2≤limh→∞μn∥T(h)xn−T(h)z∥2≤limh→∞μn((1+kh(1))∥xn−z∥+kh(2))2=μn∥xn−z∥2.Hence limh→∞T(h)z∈K*.
Let p∈F.
Since K* is closed convex set, there exists a unique v∈K* such that∥p−v∥=minx∈K*∥p−x∥.
Since p=limh→∞T(h)p and limh→∞T(h)v∈K*,∥p−limh→∞T(h)v∥=∥limh→∞T(h)p−limh→∞T(h)v∥=limh→∞∥T(h)p−T(h)v∥≤limh→∞(1+kh(1))∥p−v∥+kh(2)=∥p−v∥.Therefore, limh→∞T(h)v=v. Since T(s+t)x=T(s)T(t)x for all x∈K,
then we havev=limt→∞T(t)v=limt→∞T(s+t)v=limt→∞T(s)T(t)v=T(s)limt→∞T(t)v=T(s)vfor all s≥0.
Therefore v∈F and the proof is complete.
Lemma 2.10 (see {[8]}).
Let K be a nonempty convex subset of a Banach space E with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, and {xn} a bounded sequence of E.
If z0∈K, thenμn∥xn−z0∥2=miny∈Kμn∥xn−y∥2if and only ifμn〈y−z0,J(xn−z0)〉≤0∀y∈K.
Lemma 2.11 (see {[9]}).
Let {an} be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers
satisfying the following conditions:an+1≤(1−λn)an+bn+cn∀n≥n0,where n0 is some nonnegative integer, λn∈[0,1] with ∑n=1∞λn=∞,limsupn→∞(bn/λn)≤0, and ∑n=1∞cn<∞.
Then an→0 as n→∞.
3. Implicit Iteration SchemeTheorem 3.1.
Let E be a real reflexive and strictly convex
Banach space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, K a nonempty closed convex subset of E, ℱ={T(h):h≥0} a u.a.r generalized asymptotically
nonexpansive semigroup from K into itself with sequences {kh(1)}{kh(2)},h≥0, such that F≠∅,
and f:K→K a fixed contractive mapping with contractive
coefficient β∈(0,1).
If {xn} is given by (1.2), where limn→∞tn=∞,αn∈(0,1),limn→∞αn=0 and limn→∞(ktn(i)/αn)=0(i=1,2), then {xn} converges strongly to some common fixed point p of F such that p is the unique solution in F to variational inequality:〈f(p)−p,j(y−p)〉≤0∀y∈F.
Proof.
For any fixed y∈F,∥xn−y∥2=〈αn(f(xn)−y)+(1−αn)(T(tn)xn−y),j(xn−y)〉=αn〈f(xn)−f(y),j(xn−y)〉+αn〈f(y)−y,j(xn−y)〉+(1−αn)〈T(tn)xn−T(tn)y,j(xn−y)〉≤αnβ∥xn−y∥2+αn〈f(y)−y,j(xn−y)〉+(1−αn)∥xn−y∥[(1+ktn(1))∥xn−y∥+ktn(2)]=(1−αn(1−β)+(1−αn)ktn(1))∥xn−y∥2+αn〈f(y)−y,j(xn−y)〉+(1−αn)ktn(2)∥xn−y∥. Let dn(i)=(ktn(i)/αn)(i=1,2). Since limn→∞(ktn(i)/αn)=0 for all ε∈(0,1−β),
there exists N∈ℕ such that ktn(i)/αn<ε<1−β<(1−β)/(1−αn) for all n≥N.
Furthermore,∥xn−y∥2≤〈f(y)−y,j(xn−y)〉1−β−(1−αn)dn(1)+(1−αn)dn(2)∥xn−y∥1−β−(1−αn)dn(1)for all n≥N.
That is, ∥xn−y∥≤(∥f(y)−y∥+(1−αn)dn(2))/(1−β−(1−αn)dn(1)) for all n≥N.
Thus {xn} is bounded, so are {T(tn)xn} and {f(xn)}.
This imply thatlimn→∞∥xn−T(tn)xn∥=limn→∞αn∥T(tn)xn−f(xn)∥=0.Since {T(h)} is u.a.r and limn→∞tn=∞, then for all h≥0,limn→∞∥T(h)T(tn)xn−T(tn)xn∥≤limn→∞supx∈C∥T(h)T(tn)x−T(tn)x∥=0,where C is any bounded subset of K containing {xn}.
Since {T(h)} is continuous, hence∥xn−T(h)xn∥≤∥xn−T(tn)xn∥+∥T(tn)xn−T(h)(T(tn)xn)∥+∥T(h)(T(tn)xn)−T(h)xn∥→0.That is, for all h≥0,limn→∞∥xn−T(h)xn∥=0. We claim that the set {xn} is sequentially compact. Indeed, define the
setK*={x∈K:μn∥xn−x∥2=miny∈Kμn∥xn−y∥2}.By Lemma 2.9, we can found p∈K*∩F.
Using Lemma 2.10, we get thatμn〈y−p,j(xn−p)〉≤0∀y∈K.It follows from (3.3) that
μn∥xn−p∥2≤μn〈f(p)−p,j(xn−p)〉1−β−(1−αn)dn(1)+μn(1−αn)dn(2)∥xn−p∥1−β−(1−αn)dn(1)→0.Then we have μn∥xn−p∥=0.
Hence, there exists a subsequence {xnk} of {xn} which strongly converges to p∈F as k→∞.
Next we show that p is a solution in F to the variational inequality (3.1). In fact,
for any fixed y∈F,
there exists a constant Q>0 such that ∥xn−y∥≤Q, then∥xn−y∥2=〈αn(f(xn)−y)+(1−αn)(T(tn)xn−y),j(xn−y)〉=αn〈f(xn)−f(p)+p−xn,j(xn−y)〉+αn〈f(p)−p,j(xn−y)〉+αn〈xn−y,j(xn−y)〉+(1−αn)〈T(tn)xn−T(tn)y,j(xn−y)〉≤αn(β+1)∥xn−p∥Q+αn〈f(p)−p,j(xn−y)〉+∥xn−y∥2+(1−αn)ktn(1)Q2+(1−αn)ktn(2)Q.Therefore,〈f(p)−p,j(y−xn)〉≤(β+1)∥xn−p∥Q+(1−αn)dn(1)Q2+(1−αn)dn(2)Q.Taking limit as nk→∞ in two sides of (3.11), by Lemma 2.8 and {xnk}→p as k→∞, we obtain〈f(p)−p,j(y−p)〉≤0∀y∈F.That is, p∈F is a solution of variational inequality (3.1).
Suppose that p,q∈F satisfy (3.1),
we have 〈f(p)−p,j(q−p)〉≤0,〈f(q)−q,j(p−q)〉≤0. Combining (3.13) and (3.14), it
follows that(1−β)∥p−q∥2≤〈(p−q)−f(p)+f(q),j(p−q)〉≤0.Hence p=q,
that is, p∈F is the unique solution of variational
inequality (3.1), so each cluster point of sequence {xn} is equal to p.
Therefore, {xn} converges to p and the proof is complete.
Remark 3.2.
Let E,K,F,f,{αn}, and {tn} be as in Theorem 3.1, ℱ={T(h):h≥0} a u.a.r nonexpansive semigroup from K into itself, then our result coincides with
Theorem 3.2 in [3].
4. Modified Implicit Iteration SchemeTheorem 4.1.
Let E be a real reflexive and strictly convex
Banach space with a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm, K a nonempty closed convex subset of E, ℱ={T(h):h≥0} a u.a.r generalized asymptotically
nonexpansive semigroup from K into itself with sequences {kh(1)}{kh(2)}, h≥0, such that F≠∅,
and f:K→K a fixed contractive mapping with contractive
coefficient β∈(0,1).
If {xn} is given by (1.4), where limn→∞tn=∞, αn,βn∈(0,1], limn→∞αn=0, ∑n=1∞βn=∞,
and ∑n=1∞(ktn(1)/αn)<∞,∑n=1∞(ktn(2)/αn)<∞, then {xn} converges strongly to some common fixed point p of F such that p is the unique solution in F to variational inequality (3.1).
Proof.
For any fixed y∈F,∥xn−y∥=∥αn(yn−y)+(1−αn)(T(tn)xn−y)∥≤(1−αn)∥T(tn)xn−y∥+αn∥yn−y∥≤(1−αn)[(1+ktn(1))∥xn−y∥+ktn(2)]+αn∥yn−y∥.Let dn(i)=(ktn(i)/αn)(i=1,2). Hence,∥xn−y∥≤(1−αn)dn(2)1−(1−αn)dn(1)+∥yn−y∥1−(1−αn)dn(1)≤dn(2)1−dn(1)+βn∥f(xn−1)−y∥+(1−βn)∥xn−1−y∥1−dn(1)≤dn(2)1−dn(1)+βn∥f(xn−1)−f(y)∥1−dn(1)+βn∥f(y)−y∥1−dn(1)+(1−βn)∥xn−1−y∥1−dn(1)≤(1−βn(1−β))(∥xn−1−y∥+dn(2))1−dn(1)+βn(∥f(y)−y∥+dn(2))1−dn(1)≤11−dn(1)max{∥xn−1−y∥+dn(2),∥f(y)−y∥+dn(2)1−β}.By induction, we get
that∥xn−y∥≤11−dn(1)max{∥xn−2−y∥+dn−1(2)1−dn−1(1)+dn(2),∥f(y)−y∥+dn−1(2)(1−dn−1(1))(1−β),∥f(y)−y∥+dn(2)1−β}⋯≤1(1−dn(1))⋯(1−d1(1))×max{∥x1−y∥+∑i=1ndi(2),∥f(y)−y∥+d1(2)1−β,…,∥f(y)−y∥+dn(2)1−β}.Since ∑n=1∞dn(i)<∞(i=1,2), we know from Abel–Dini theorem that there
exists r>0 such that limn→∞(1−dn(1))⋯(1−d1(1))=r.
Thus {xn} is bounded, so are {T(tn)xn}, {f(xn)} and {yn}.
This imply thatlimn→∞∥xn−T(tn)xn∥=limn→∞αn∥yn−T(tn)xn∥=0.Since {T(h):h≥0} is u.a.r. and limn→∞tn=∞ for all h≥0,limn→∞∥T(h)T(tn)xn−T(tn)xn∥≤limn→∞supx∈C∥T(h)T(tn)x−T(tn)x∥=0,where C is any bounded subset of K containing {xn}.
Since T(h) is continuous, hence∥xn−T(h)xn∥≤∥xn−T(tn)xn∥+∥T(tn)xn−T(h)(T(tn)xn)∥+∥T(h)(T(tn)xn)−T(h)xn∥→0.That is, for all h≥0,limn→∞∥xn−T(h)xn∥=0.From Theorem 3.1, there exists
the unique solution p∈F to the variational inequality (3.1). Since p=T(h)p for all h≥0, we have∥xn+1−p∥2=αn+1〈yn+1−p,j(xn+1−p)〉+(1−αn+1)〈T(tn+1)xn+1−p,j(xn+1−p)〉=αn+1〈βn+1f(xn)+(1−βn+1)xn−p,j(xn+1−p)〉+(1−αn+1)〈T(tn+1)xn+1−p,j(xn+1−p)〉≤αn+1βn+1〈f(xn)−f(p),j(xn+1−p)〉+αn+1βn+1〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉+αn+1(1−βn+1)〈xn−p,j(xn+1−p)〉+(1−αn+1)∥xn+1−p∥[(1+ktn+1(1))∥xn+1−p∥+ktn+1(2)]≤αn+1βn+1β2∥xn−p∥2+∥xn+1−p∥22+αn+1(1−βn+1)∥xn−p∥2+∥xn+1−p∥22+(1−αn+1)∥xn+1−p∥2+(1−αn+1)ktn+1(1)∥xn+1−p∥2+(1−αn+1)ktn+1(2)∥xn+1−p∥+αn+1βn+1〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉=αn+12∥xn+1−p∥2+(1−αn+1)∥xn+1−p∥2+αn+12(1+β2βn+1−βn+1)∥xn−p∥2+(1−αn+1)ktn+1(1)∥xn+1−p∥2+(1−αn+1)ktn+1(2)∥xn+1−p∥+αn+1βn+1〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉.Therefore∥xn+1−p∥2≤(1−(1−β2)βn+1)∥xn−p∥2+2βn+1〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉+2(1−αn+1)(dn+1(1)∥xn+1−p∥+dn+1(2))∥xn+1−p∥.That is,∥xn+1−p∥2≤(1−λn)∥xn−p∥2+bn+cn,where λn=(1−β2)βn+1,bn=2βn+1〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉 and cn=2(1−αn+1)(dn+1(1)∥xn+1−p∥+dn+1(2))∥xn+1−p∥. Since ∑n=1∞λn=∞, ∑n=1∞dn(i)<∞(i=1,2),∥xn+1−p∥ is bounded, we have ∑n=1∞cn<∞. So we only need to show that limsupn→∞(bn/λn)≤0, that is,lim¯n→∞〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉≤0.Let zm=amf(zm)+(1−am)T(tm)zm,
where tm and αm satisfy the condition of Theorem 3.1. Then it
follows from Theorem 3.1 that p=limm→∞zm.
Since∥xn+1−zm∥2=(1−αm)〈T(tm)zm−xn+1,j(zm−xn+1)〉+αm〈f(zm)−xn+1,j(zm−xn+1)〉=(1−αm)(〈T(tm)zm−T(tm)xn+1,j(zm−xn+1)〉+〈T(tm)xn+1−xn+1,j(zm−xn+1)〉)+αm〈f(zm)−zm−(f(p)−p),j(zm−xn+1)〉+αm〈f(p)−p,j(zm−xn+1)〉+αm〈zm−xn+1,j(zm−xn+1)〉≤∥xn+1−zm∥2+(1−αm)(ktm(1)Q+ktm(2))Q+(1−αm)∥T(tm)xn+1−xn+1∥Q+αm〈f(p)−p,j(zm−xn+1)〉+αm(1+β)∥zm−p∥Q.Furthermore,〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−zm)〉≤1−αmαm(ktm(1)Q+ktm(2))Q+∥T(tm)xn+1−xn+1∥αmQ+(1+β)∥zm−p∥Q,where Q is a constant such that Q≥∥zm−xn+1∥.
Hence, taking upper limit as n→∞ firstly, and then as m→∞ in (4.13), we havelim¯m→∞lim¯n→∞〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−zm)〉≤0.On the other hand, since p=limm→∞zm and by Lemma 2.8, we have〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−zm)〉→〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉uniformly.Thus given ε>0, there exists N≥1 such that if m>N for all n we have〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉<〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−zm)〉+ε.Hence, taking upper limit as n→∞ firstly, and then as m→∞ in two sides of (4.16), we get thatlim¯n→∞〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−p)〉≤lim¯m→∞lim¯n→∞〈f(p)−p,j(xn+1−zm)〉+ε≤ε.For the arbitrariness of ε,
(4.11) holds. By Lemma 2.11, xn→p and the proof is complete.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (10771173) and Natural Science Foundation
Project of Henan (2008B110012).
BrowderF. E.Convergence of approximants to fixed points of nonexpansive nonlinear mappings in Banach spaces1967241829010.1007/BF00251595MR0206765ZBL0148.13601XuH.-K.Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings2004298127929110.1016/j.jmaa.2004.04.059MR2086546ZBL1061.47060SongY.XuS.Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive semigroup in Banach spaces2008338115216110.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.021MR2386406ZBL1138.47040SongY.ChenR.Convergence theorems of iterative algorithms for continuous pseudocontractive mappings200767248649710.1016/j.na.2006.06.009MR2317183ZBL1126.47054ChidumeC. E.OfoeduE. U.Approximation of common fixed points for finite families of total asymptotically nonexpansive mappings2007333112814110.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.023MR2323481ZBL1127.47051ReichS.On the asymptotic behavior of nonlinear semigroups and the range of accretive operators198179111312610.1016/0022-247X(81)90013-5MR603380ZBL0457.47053TakahashiW.2000Yokohama, JapanYokohamaiv+276MR1864294ZBL0997.47002TakahashiW.UedaY.On Reich's strong convergence theorems for resolvents of accretive operators1984104254655310.1016/0022-247X(84)90019-2MR766150ZBL0599.47084AoyamaK.KimuraY.TakahashiW.ToyodaM.Approximation of common fixed points of a countable family of nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space20076782350236010.1016/j.na.2006.08.032MR2338104ZBL1130.47045