International Journal of Photoenergy

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 186752, 5 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/186752

Research Article

LED Light-Activated Hypocrellin B Induces Mitochondrial Damage of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Yuan Jiang,¹ Albert Wingnang Leung,² Junyan Xiang,¹ and Chuanshan Xu²

¹Department of Photodynamic and Sonodynamic Therapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China

²School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

Received 22 December 2011; Revised 1 May 2012; Accepted 7 May 2012

Academic Editor: Timon Cheng-Yi Liu

Copyright © 2012 Yuan Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objective. Hypocrellin is a natural photosensitizer from a traditional Chinese herb. In the present study, our aim is to investigate the effect of LED light-activated hypocrellin B on mitochondria of ovarian cancer cells. Material and Methods. Ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells were incubated with hypocrellin B at the concentration of 2.5 μM for 5 h and then irradiated by blue light from a novel LED source. Cell survival rate of HO-8910 cells was measured using MTT assay 24 h after photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B. Mitochondrial morphology was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using flow cytometry with JC-1 staining. Results. MTT assay showed that cell survival rate of HO-8910 cells in the photodynamic treatment group has significantly decreased down to % (). Light irradiation alone or hypocrellin B alone showed no significant impact. In our TEM mitochondria of the cells after photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B showed severe damage with swollen mitochondria that had nearly nonexistant cristae. Mitochondrial membrane potential remarkably decreased after photodynamic action of hypocrellin B. Conclusion. The findings demonstrated that photodynamic action of hypocrellin B significantly decreased cell proliferation of ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells, caused severe damage to mitochondrial structure, and induced mitochondrial membrane collapse.

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers threatening the health of women worldwide. Significant advances have been made in therapeutic modalities in the management of ovarian cancer. However, drawbacks exist in some of the commonly used modalities [1, 2]. Therefore, novel and more effective therapeutic strategies are needed for improving the clinical outcomes.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can eradicate the unwanted cells/tissues via the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during photodynamic treatment, in which a photosensitizer is activated by light with an appropriate wavelength [3, 4]. The doubly selective advantages, including photosensitizer selectively retaining in tumor tissue and site-directed light irradiation, make PDT become a promising alternative to combat malignancies. Photosensitizer is a key component affecting the efficacy of photodynamic therapy. Hypocrellin B is a natural product isolated from a traditional Chinese Medicine Hypocrella bambuase [5, 6]. Growing evidence shows that hypocrellin B has significantly photodynamic activity with high quantum yields of singlet oxygen (¹O₂) [7, 8]. Upon light activation hypocrellin B exhibits remarkably photodynamic eradication of cancer cells, virus, and bacteria. Our previous study showed that blue light from a novel LED source in our Lab could activate hypocrellin B, subsequently induced photocytotoxicity of ovarian cancer cells [9]. However, the biological mechanism is still unclear. On considering that mitochondria play an important role in cell growth and death, in the present study we focused on investigating the effect of photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B on mitochondrial morphology and mitochondrial membrane potential of ovarian cancer cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sensitizer

Hypocrellin B was used as a photosensitizer in our present study from Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. A stock solution was made in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 100 mM and kept in the dark at −20°C.

2.2. Cell Culture

Ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells were stored in the Institute of Ultrasound and Medicine Engineering, Chongqing under the approval of the ethics committee of Chongqing Medical University. The cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco), 50 μg/mL penicillin, 50 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10 μg/mL neomycin.

2.3. Photodynamic Treatment

Photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B in HO-8910 cells was the same as described by our previous study [9]. In brief, the cells were incubated with hypocrellin B (2.5 μM) at 37°C for 5 h in the dark. Unbound hypocrellin B was washed away and the cells were exposed for 17 s (except for the dark controls) to blue light emitted from LED source system with the wavelength of 470 nm and the power density of 60 mW/cm². After light irradiation, the cells were then incubated for analysis. All experiments were randomly divided into 4 groups: photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B, hypocrellin B treatment alone, light irradiation alone, and sham irradiation. The cells in the photodynamic treatment group were incubated with hypocrellin B before the exposure to light. The cells in light irradiation alone group were irradiated by light without incubation with hypocrellin B. Those in hypocrellin B treatment alone group were incubated with hypocrellin B without light irradiation. The cells in sham radiation group were treated by neither light irradiation nor hypocrellin B.

2.4. Cell Survival Measurement

To measure cell survival rates of ovarian cancer cells treated by photodynamic action of hypocrellin B, HO-8910 cells ( cells/well) were cultured overnight in 96-well microplates. Hypocrellin B (2.5 μM) was added into cells in each well and incubated for 5 h in the dark. Unbound hypocrellin B was removed and the cells were exposed (except for the dark controls) to blue light from LED system with the wavelength of 470 nm and the energy density of 1 J/cm². After photodynamic action of hypocrellin B the cells were incubated for 20 h at 37°C. After that, 100 μL MTT-containing medium was added into each well (0.5 mg/mL, diluted with medium). After the incubation for 4 h at 37°C, MTT-containing medium was removed and 100 μL DMSO was added into each well. The optical density (OD) was measured using an iEMS Analyzer (Lab-system, Type1401) at the wavelength of 570 nm. The cell survival rate is calculated using the following formula: cell survival rate (%) = OD of the treatment group/OD of the control group ×100%.

2.5. Mitochondrial Morphological Observation

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed to observe mitochondrial morphological changes of ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells. It was carried out 6 hours after hypocrellin B (2.5 μM) had been activated by blue light from LED system with the wavelength of 470 nm and the energy density of 1 J/cm². Fixed cells were postfixed in 2% OsO₄, dehydrated in graded alcohol, and flat-embedded in Epon 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections (100 nm) were prepared, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined under an electron microscopy (H-600; Hitachi, Japan).

2.6. Mitochondrial Membrane Functional Measurement

Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using flow cytometry with JC-1 staining. Briefly, HO-8910 cells were incubated with hypocrellin B (2.5 μM) for 5 h. The cells were then irradiated by blue light from LED source with the energy density of 1 J/cm² and further incubated for 3 h. Finally, the treated cells were washed 3 times in PBS and stained with JC-1 for 20 min at 37°C in the dark. The washed cells were resuspended in PBS and then analyzed using flow cytometry (SE, Becton Dickinson) with the excitation setting at 488 nm, and signals were acquired at the FL-2 channel. At least 10,000 cells per sample were acquired in histograms and data analyzed by CellQuest software.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 for Windows. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance). A value <0.05 was considered significantly difference.

3. Results

3.1. Inhibition of Cell Proliferation

MTT assay showed that cell survival rate of the photodynamic treatment group was %, which was significantly lower than that of the sham group (). Neither hypocrellin B treatment alone nor light irradiation alone had significant effect on cell survival (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Cell survival rate of HO-8910 cells was measured using MTT 24 h after photodynamic action of hypocrellin B.

3.2. Mitochondrial Morphological Changes

Mitochondria which maintained integrity of cell membrane and cristae were observed in ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells after sham irradiation, hypocrellin B treatment alone, and light irradiation treatment alone Figures 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c). After the combined treatment of light irradiation and hypocrellin B, swollen mitochondria were observed and some cells even showed an absence of cristae (Figure 2(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 2: Mitochondrial morphological changes in HO-8910 cells were observed using TEM 6 h after photodynamic action of hypocrellin B (×15,000). (a): Sham irradiation; (b): hypocrellin B treatment alone; (c): light irradiation alone; (d): photodynamic action of hypocrellin B.

3.3. Changes in Mitochondrial Function

Ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells were sensitized with 2.5 μM hypocrellin B and then irradiated by LED light. After JC-1 staining, flow cytometry was used to analyze the changes of mitochondrial membrane potential. Figure 3 showed that the spectral shift of the fluorescence curve to the left, indicating that mitochondrial membrane depolarization occurred in the treated HO-8910 cells.

Figure 3: Mitochondrial membrane potential of HO-8910 cells was measured using flow cytometry with JC-1 staining 6 h after photodynamic action of hypocrellin B. The spectral shift of the fluorescence curve to the left indicates mitochondrial membrane depolarization. A: sham irradiation; B: hypocrellin B treatment alone; C: light irradiation alone; D: photodynamic action of hypocrellin B.

4. Discussion

Hypocrellin B from traditional Chinese herb Hypocrella bambuase has been confirmed as an efficient singlet oxygen generator upon light irradiation [5, 6, 10, 11]. Growing evidences show that light-activated hypocrellin B can markedly kill malignant cells and induce cell apoptosis [8, 9]. Our previous studies observed that hypocrellin B irradiated by blue light from LED source could cause significant damage to ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells [9]. In the present study, MTT assay showed that cell survival rate of HO-8910 cells in the photodynamic treatment group decreased significantly. Hypocrellin B treatment alone or light irradiation alone showed no significant impact. These data demonstrated that photodynamic action of hypocrellin B could decrease cell survival rate of ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells. However, the underlying mechanisms still need to be clarified.

Mitochondria play a central role in the regulation of cell growth and death [12, 13]. Mitochondria affect cellular breathing and energy metabolism directly or indirectly, subsequently decreasing cell proliferation and inducing cell death [14, 15]. In our TEM, we observed mitochondria with well-developed cristae in ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells after sham irradiation, hypocrellin B treatment alone, and light irradiation alone. After photodynamic treatment of hypocrellin B, some mitochondria displayed serious damage and disappearance of cristae. These alterations of mitochondrial structure would directly affect mitochondrial functions. In our present study, flow cytometry analysis with JC-1 staining also found that the spectral shift of the fluorescence curve was to the left, indicating that mitochondrial membrane depolarization occurred in HO-8910 cells treated by photodynamic action of hypocrellin B. The mitochondrial membrane depolarization can induce the release of mitochondrial cytochrome c into cytoplasm to initiate effector caspases such as caspases 3, 6, and 7. These effector Caspases can induce the generation of tBid to cause cell program death [16–18]. These findings suggest that mitochondrial morphological alterations and mitochondrial membrane depolarization are important events in photodynamic action of hypocrellin B on ovarian cancer HO-8910 cells. Hypocrellin B is a very good generator of ROS causing cell damage under light irradiation. It is well known that ROS has a very limited diffuse distance inside the cells; thus, ROS result in intracellular damage often close to the sensitizer localization [19, 20]. Ali and Olivo have reported that hypocrellin B mainly localizes in lysosomes other than mitochondria [21], suggesting that lysosomes are the direct target of photodynamic action of hypocrellin B. Recent studies have observed that there is lysosomal/mitochondrial crosstalk inside the cell [22–25]. The damaged lysosomes can cause lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) and release cathepsins into the cytosol, subsequently inducing the mitochondrial alterations via the bcl-2 family Bid or bax [23–25]. Therefore, hypocrellin B-mediated photodynamic action induced cell death of HO-8910 cells probably through lysosomal-mitochondrial axis.

5. Conclusion

Photodynamic action of hypocrellin B under LED light irradiation significantly decreased cell proliferation and caused damage to mitochondrial morphology and function of ovarian cancer cells, highlighting that mitochondrial damage might be an important event in photodynamic therapy of hypocrellin B on ovarian cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grants from National Nature Science Foundation of China (30973168) and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (2030446). The authors express their sincere thanks to Mr. Eric Chuck Hey Pun, Professor Faqi Li, Professor Shen Chen, Mr. Jianyong Wu, Mr. Dejiang Chao, and Ms. Qinglin Li for their helpful assistance.

References

L. Y. Han, E. Kipps, and S. B. Kaye, “Current treatment and clinical trials in ovarian cancer,” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 521–534, 2010.

L. Hu, C. McArthur, and R. B. Jaffe, “Ovarian cancer stem-like side-population cells are tumourigenic and chemoresistant,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 1276–1283, 2010.

T. J. Dougherty, C. J. Gomer, B. W. Henderson et al., “Photodynamic therapy,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 889–905, 1998.

S. Pachydaki, L. Sobrin, and J. W. Miller, “Photodynamic therapy and combination treatments,” International Ophthalmology Clinics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 95–115, 2007.

J. B. Hudson, J. Zhou, J. Chen, L. Harris, L. Yip, and G. H. Towers, “Hypocrellin, from Hypocrella bambuase, is phototoxic to human immunodeficiency virus,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 253–255, 1994.

D. Zhenjun and J. W. Lown, “Hypocrellins and their use in photosensitization,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 609–616, 1990.

E. P. Estey, K. Brown, Z. Diwu et al., “Hypocrellins as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: a screening evaluation and pharmacokinetic study,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 343–350, 1996.

Z. J. Diwu, R. P. Haugland, J. Liu et al., “Photosensitization by anticancer agents 21: new perylene- and aminonaphthoquinones,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 589–593, 1996.

Y. Jiang, A. W. N. Leung, J. Y. Xiang, and C. S. Xu, “Blue light-activated hypocrellin B damages ovarian cancer cells,” Laser Physics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 300–305, 2012.

S. M. Ali, S. K. Chee, G. Y. Yuen, and M. Olivo, “Hypericin and hypocrellin induced apoptosis in human mucosal carcinoma cells,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2002.

P. Wang, C. S. Xu, J. Xu, X. Wang, and A. W. Leung, “Hypocrellin B enhances ultrasound-induced cell death of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 336–342, 2010.

A. Chalah and R. Khosravi-Far, “The mitochondrial death pathway,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 615, pp. 25–45, 2008.

D. J. Smith, H. Ng, R. M. Kluck, and P. Nagley, “The mitochondrial gateway to cell death,” IUBMB Life, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 383–389, 2008.

Z. Y. Shen, J. Shen, Q. S. Li, C. Y. Chen, J. Y. Chen, and Y. Zeng, “Morphological and functional changes of mitochondria in apoptotic esophageal carcinoma cells induced by arsenic trioxide,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2002.

H. C. Lee, P. H. Yin, C. Y. Lu, C. W. Chi, and Y. H. Wei, “Increase of mitochondria and mitochondrial DNA in response to oxidative stress in human cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 348, no. 2, pp. 425–432, 2000.

Y. Wang, C. M. Che, J. F. Chiu, and Q. Y. He, “Dioscin (saponin)-induced generation of reactive oxygen species through mitochondria dysfunction: a proteomic-based study,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4703–4710, 2007.

P. Wang, C. Xu, X. Xia et al., “Mitochondrial damage in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells induced by ultrasound radiation in the presence of hypocrellin B,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2010.

S. A. Susin, H. K. Lorenzo, N. Zamzami et al., “Molecular characterization of mitochodrial apoptosis-inducing factor,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6718, pp. 441–446, 1999.

J. Morgan and A. R. Oseroff, “Mitochondria-based photodynamic anti-cancer therapy,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 49, no. 1-2, pp. 71–86, 2001.

J. Xu, X. Xia, X. Wang et al., “Sonodynamic action of pyropheophorbide-a methyl ester in liver cancer cells,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1031–1037, 2010.

S. M. Ali and M. Olivo, “Efficacy of hypocrellin pharmacokinetics in phototherapy,” International journal of oncology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1229–1237, 2002.

M. J. Sousa, F. Azevedo, A. Pedras et al., “Vacuole-mitochondrial cross-talk during apoptosis in yeast: a model for understanding lysosome-mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in mammals,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1533–1537, 2011.

M. Ali-Seyed, R. Bhuvaneswari, K. C. Soo, and M. Olivo, “Photolon—photosensitization induces apoptosis via ROS-mediated cross-talk between mitochondria and lysosomes,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 821–831, 2011.

L. Liu, Z. Zhang, and D. Xing, “Cell death via mitochondrial apoptotic pathway due to activation of Bax by lysosomal photodamage,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 53–68, 2011.

G. Yang, S. Wang, L. Zhong et al., “6-Gingerol induces apoptosis through lysosomal-mitochondrial axis in human hepatoma G2 cells,” Phytotherapy Research. In press