Phloxine B and bromophenol blue as the sensitizers of dye-sensitized solar cells were investigated via UV-Vis spectra, FT-IR spectra, fluorescence spectra, and current-voltage characteristics. The frontier molecular orbital, vibration analysis, and the first hyperpolarizability were calculated with DFT/6-31G(d). The dipole moment, light harvesting efficiency (LHE), and larger absolute value of driving force of electron injection (ΔGinject) were also discussed. The calculated results were compared with the experimental results of phloxine B and bromophenol blue. It was found that, compared with bromophenol blue, bigger dipole moment of phloxine B results in larger open circuit voltage (Voc) according to the correlation between dipole moment and Voc. At the same time, for configuration of phloxine B, it has higher LHE and ΔGinject, which are helpful to enhance the abilities of absorbing sunlight and electron injection. Therefore, higher LHE and ΔGinject for phloxine B produced a larger value of Jsc.
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities2572014CB31Heilongjiang Provincial Youth Science FoundationQC2013C006National Natural Science Foundation of China1140405511374353China Postdoctoral Science Foundation2016M590270Heilongjiang PostdoctoralLBH-Z15002National Undergraduate Innovative and Entrepreneurial Training Program201610225099Academic Research Training of NEFU for UndergraduateKY20150201. Introduction
With gradually aggravated environmental problem, it is hoped that more energies can be found to replace traditional fossil energy. Solar energy as the clean and renewable source has aroused extensive attention. Since O’Regan and Graetzel [1] developed dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), the photo-to-electric conversion efficiency (η) of this type of solar cells has achieved 7.1–7.9%. Due to their friendliness and low cost of production [2–5], more attention has been paid to investigate the relationship between structure and performance and to design new DSSCs.
The band engineering of the solar cells devices is shown in Figure 1, which indicates the complete energy levels of the different materials used on the DSSCs devices. DSSCs have the characteristics of the following five aspects [6–9]: (1) Dye molecules absorb sunlight energy, and they are excited from ground state to excited state. (2) After the dye molecules are excited, the electrons are injected into the conduction band of semiconductor and moved into the conducting glass. (3) The electrons diffuse into the external circuit. (4) The dye molecules in oxidation state are deoxidized by the electrolyte in reduction. (5) The electrolyte in oxidation state is deoxidized after receiving the electron at the conducting glass, thereby completing a cycle.
Schematic of band edge engineering to electron transfer.
The DSSCs are mainly composed of a nanocrystalline porous semiconductor electrode-absorbed dye, a counter electrode, and an electrolyte containing iodide and triiodide ions [10]. The dye as a sensitizer plays a key factor in absorbing sunlight and conversion solar energy into electric energy. DSSCs mainly are divided into organic dyes and inorganic dyes [11–13]. Inorganic dyes such as N3 and N719 polypyridine complexes [14] have been used as sensitizer in DSSCs. Although DSSCs of inorganic dyes have provided a relatively high efficiency, there are several shortcomings of using inorganic dyes in DSSCs. For example, some inorganic dyes are considered as resources that are limited in amount, which result in more expensive cost in the field of DSSC. By contraries, organic dyes not only are cheaper, but also have been reported to reach efficiency as high as 9.8% [15]. Nevertheless, the conversion efficiency η of organic dyes was still lower than that of inorganic dyes, and it was not suitable for commercial production in comparison with silicon cell [3]. Torchani et al. [16] studied the henna and mallow (Mloukhya) as the sensitizers of DSSCs. The results showed that the filling factor of mallow solar cells is 55%, and η is 0.215%. Zhou et al. [17] studied twenty natural dyes, extracted from natural materials (such as flowers, leaves, fruits, traditional Chinese medicines, and beverages), and the results showed that the open circuit voltage and η of mangosteen pericarp are the highest, which are 0.686 V and 1.17%, respectively. Now several organic dyes have been utilized as sensitizers in DSSCs, such as coumarin [18], porphyrins [19–21], triphenylmethane [22, 23], indoline [24, 25], and cyanine [26, 27].
In recent years, quantum chemistry method has provided a reliable theoretical basis for the rapid screening of high efficiency dye molecules [28–32]. Kumara et al. [33] reported the black tea waste extract (BTE) as a sensitizer for DSSCs in experimental and theoretical studies. The BTE has four theaflavin analogues, and they are calculated via density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). The results showed that theaflavin and theaflavin digallate as sensitizers have well performance among four analogues. Beni and Zarandi [34] analyzed the 3-amino-4-nitrofurazan molecule using functional theory (DFT) and MP2 methods. The geometry of the molecule in the gas phase was optimized and compared with that of the crystal. According to DFT and MP2 methods, they obtain the stable gaseous form. El-Shishtawy et al. [35] studied electronic absorption spectra, ground state geometries, and electronic structures of symmetric and asymmetric squaraine dyes with DFT method, and they found that absorption of squaraine dyes can extend into NIR region by straightforward structural modification, and there are well energy match between dye and TiO2. Sun et al. [36] investigated the optical and electrical properties of two dyes, purpurin and alizarin complexone, as sensitizers by using UV-Vis spectrum, FT-IR spectrum, cyclic voltammetry, I-V characteristics, and DFT calculation, and the results indicated that the side chain has an interesting effect on the optical and electrical properties of sensitizers. Li and coworkers [37] investigated the ground state and excited state properties of polymers BSeTT, QTT, BDT-DTBTBPz (Pz), and BDT-DTBTBQx (Qx) and their derivatives D1, D2, and D3 via DFT and TD-DFT methods, which indicated that the molecule BDT-DTBTBPz and designed molecule (D2) had the best optical and electronic properties among the investigated system. Song et al. [38] reported that electron transfer is a key process of light driven charge separation reaction in organic solar cell.
In this work, phloxine B and bromophenol blue were selected as sensitizers to investigate the optical and electrical properties of DSSCs experimentally, and the UV-Vis spectra, fluorescence spectra, and FT-IR spectra are calculated with density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT). At the same time, the absorption spectra, infrared spectra, and fluorescence spectra of phloxine B and bromophenol blue are analyzed and compared. In addition, the radiative lifetime (τ) and total static first hyperpolarizability of the two dyes are calculated. Combined study of experiment and theory provides deep insight into the relationship between structure and performance for two DSSCS.
2. Methods
UV-Vis spectra were measured with TU-1900 spectrometer (Beijing, China), and the FT-IR spectra were measured with FT-IR 360 spectrometer (Nicolet, Madison, WI, USA). Solar energy conversion efficiency measurements were done with a solar simulation instrument (Pecell-15, Japan), and light intensity was adjusted via a reference standard Si-solar cell at sunlight intensity of 100 mW cm−2. The ground state structures of phloxine B and bromophenol blue were optimized with DFT [39] using B3LYP [40] functional at the 6-31G(d) basis set. Based on the optimized ground state structures, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO), and energy gaps of the two dye molecules were computed, and vibration frequencies were done at the same level. There was no imaginary vibration frequency in the minimum energy structure in the potential energy landscape. Simulation of absorption spectra was done with TD-DFT at the same level. The total static first hyperpolarizability can be written as follows [41]:(1)β=βx2+βy2+βz2.Individual static components in the above equation are calculated from(2)βi=βiii+13∑i≠jβijj+βjij+βjji,where βijk(i,j,k=x,y,z) are tenser components of hyperpolarizability. Due to the Kleinman symmetry, we finally obtain the equation that has been employed:(3)βtot=βxxx+βxyy+βxzz2+βyyy+βyzz+βyxx2+βzzz+βzxx+βzyy21/2.All of the calculations were performed by using Gaussian 09 package [42].
3. Results and Discussion3.1. The Optical Properties of the Dye
The chemical structures of bromophenol blue and phloxine B are shown in Figure 2. The experimental absorption spectra of two dyes in ethanol are presented in Figure 3(a). Absorption spectra of phloxine B showed that the absorption range was 450–600 nm, with maximum absorption peak (λmax) at around 550 nm. Absorption spectra of bromophenol blue were displayed within the range of 300–500 nm, and λmax was 410 nm, and bromophenol blue had no other obvious absorption peaks (see Figure 3(a)).
Chemical structures of bromophenol blue and phloxine B.
(a) Measured UV-Vis absorption spectra of bromophenol blue and phloxine B in experiment. (b) Simulated UV-Vis absorption spectra of bromophenol blue and phloxine B in solvent by using TD-DFT/6-31G(d).
In addition, absorption spectra of bromophenol blue and phloxine B were computed via TD-DFT/6-31G(d) in solvent (see Figure 3(b)), and the data are listed in Table 1. Phloxine B showed the absorption region in 300–700 nm, with a λmax of 472 nm. Bromophenol blue absorption range was 230–330 nm, while λmax was 289 nm. The absorptions in visible and near-UV area were important areas for photovoltaic performance, so there are two important factors (the oscillator strength larger than 0.1 and absorption bands with the wavelength longer than 300 nm). The oscillator strength of the first excited state S1 of phloxine B was 0.7582 (at 472 nm), in which the oscillator strength was the strongest among the six excited states. The maximum absorption in absorption spectra was dominated by HOMO → LUMO transition (contribution is about 0.70069), and the corresponding transition energy was 2.63 eV. Meanwhile, for bromophenol blue, at the first excited state S1, the oscillator strength was 0.0322. The oscillator strength of S1 was the strongest in the states, and this state is composed of HOMO → LUMO electron transition.
Transition energy and oscillator strength of phloxine B and bromophenol blue in solvent were calculated by using TD-DFT/6-31(d) in the solvent.
Dyes
State
E (eV)
Absorption peak λ (nm)
Contribution MO
Strength f
Phloxine B
S1
2.63
472
(0.70069)H → L
0.7582
S2
3.00
413
(0.69801)H − 1 → L
0.0187
S3
3.30
376
(0.49261)H − 4 → L
0.0015
S4
3.32
373
(0.53756)H − 2 → L
0.0039
S5
3.56
349
(0.70249)H → L + 1
0.0243
S6
3.64
340
(0.49354)H → L + 2
0.0079
Bromophenol blue
S1
4.28
289
(0.69468)H → L
0.0322
S2
4.36
284
(0.69221)H − 1 → L
0.0206
S3
4.53
273
(0.69343)H → L + 1
0.0021
S4
4.61
269
(0.52434)H − 1 → L + 1
0.0127
S5
4.62
231
(0.48364)H − 2 → L
0.0148
S6
4.72
263
(0.60405)H − 3 → L
0.0037
For more in-depth understanding of the electronic structure of the two dyes, the isodensity plots of the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) of two dyes were shown in Figure 4. Phloxine B consists of two parts, namely, sodium-2,3,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene and sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate, respectively. The electron density of HOMO was located on the sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group, and that of LUMO was located on conjugated bridge and sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group. From the distribution of the above molecular orbitals of HOMO and LUMO, electron transfer was most likely to occur from sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group unit to conjugated bridge. Electron densities of other MOs were shown in Figure 4, corresponding to the HOMO − 1, HOMO − 2, HOMO − 3, LUMO + 1, LUMO + 2, and LUMO + 3, respectively.
Electron densities of the selected HOMO and LUMO of the two dyes.
Bromophenol blue is composed of three parts, namely, two identical 2,6-dibromophenol groups and pyridine, respectively. The electron density of HOMO was located on two identical 2,6-dibromophenol groups and conjugated bridge, and that of LUMO was located on pyridine and conjugated bridge. As the electron transition is from HOMO to LUMO, it was found that a tiny fraction of MOs for HOMO and LUMO was loaded in conjugated bridge, and more electrons were moved to pyridine. Therefore, excitation should result in electron transfer from two identical 2,6-dibromophenol groups to pyridine. The HOMOs and LUMOs in the dyes indicated that the transitions at maximum absorptions had intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) character, and they played an important role in DSSCs.
3.2. Fourier Transforms Infrared Spectra
Fourier transforms infrared (FT-IR) spectra of phloxine B and bromophenol blue were recorded in the 500–4000 cm−1 range using KBr pellets and calculated at DFT/B3LYP methods with the 6-31G(d) basis set. The experimental FT-IR spectra were shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b), and calculated FT-IR spectra were given in Figures 5(c) and 5(d). For absorption peak vibration of bromophenol blue, the absorption peaks were distributed in ranges of 1000–2000 cm−1 and 3000–4000 cm−1. They were 1398.75, 1472.31, 1634.19, 3440.26 cm−1, and 3851.47 cm−1 (see Figure 5(a)), respectively. Swing vibration of two C-H bonds of 2,6-dibromophenol group for bromophenol blue was observed at 3243.83 cm−1 (see Figure 5(c)). Swing vibration of two O-H bonds of two 2,6-dibromophenol groups was observed at 1389.36 cm−1. Stretching vibration of two C-H bonds of pyridine group was observed at 1452.16 cm−1 and 3652.02 cm−1, respectively. Pyridine group swing vibration was observed at 1632.13 cm−1.
(a) Measured FT-IR spectra of bromophenol blue in experiment. (b) Measured FT-IR spectra of phloxine B in experiment. (c) Simulated IR spectra of bromophenol blue in theory. (d) Simulated IR spectra of phloxine B in theory.
C-H vibrations were studied as follows: C-H swing and stretching vibration in unit 2,6-dibromophenol groups were calculated in the range of 681.42, 868.79–934.34, 974.53, 1085.05–1087.63, 1205.43–1209.30, 1232.40, 1333.11–1338.06, 1388–1445.35, 1519.36–1609.41, and 1641.86–1644.21 cm−1 and at 3234.68–3443.83 cm−1. C-H swing and stretching in pyridine group were calculated in range of 718.94, 765.71–766.86, 842.82–863.99, 944.66, 993.54–999.10, 1057.47, 1108.78–1171.92, and 1452.16–1513.01 cm−1 and at 3192.57–322.58 cm−1, respectively.
For S-O, OH, and ring vibrations, results showed that S-O stretching vibration was observed at 746.58 cm−1, and S=O symmetric stretching was observed at 1171.92 and 1357.69 cm−1 in FT-IR, respectively. OH swing and stretching vibration occurred in the range of 613.14, 1205.43–1209.30, 1295.17–1301.14, 1338.06 1388.22–1445.35, 1519.36–1609.41, and 3651.80–3652.02 cm−1. Benzene rings stretching vibration often occurred in range of 718.94–742.42, 766.86, and 1606.85–1641.80 cm−1. Benzene rings twisting vibration was found to be 765.71 cm−1.
For absorption peak vibration of phloxine B, the main absorption peaks of FT-IR spectra focus on 1000–2000 cm−1. They were 1242.93, 1355.36, 1463.41, 1558.18 cm−1, and 1634.31 cm−1 (see Figure 5(b)), respectively. Swing vibration of sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group was observed at 1453.18 cm−1 and 1548.97 cm−1 (see Figure 5(d)), respectively. Two C-H bonds’ stretching vibrations of sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group were observed at 1228.48 cm−1 and 1356.04 cm−1, respectively. C=O bond stretching vibration of sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group was observed at 1642.66 cm−1.
For C-H, COONa, and O-Na vibrations, it was found that C-H swing and stretching vibration in sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group were assigned in the region of 936.95, 987.30, 1008.72, 1030.88, 1204.51–1511.59, 1545.61, 1617.78, and 1665.48 cm−1, respectively. The COONa symmetric stretching vibration of sodium-2,4,5,7-tetrabromo-6-oxo-xanthen-3-olate group occurred at 910.95 and 1686.27 cm−1, respectively. O-Na stretching vibration was observed at 1593.03 cm−1.
Furthermore, there are three benzene rings in the phloxine B. Benzene ring symmetric stretching vibration was observed in the region of 910.95–987.30, 1030.88, 1388.10, 1453.18, 1532.61, and 1572.03 cm−1 and at 1665.48 cm−1, respectively. Benzene ring asymmetric stretching vibration was calculated in range of 1008.72, 1136.98–1204.51, 1272.62, 1290.53, 1356.04, 1382.82, 1488.37, 1511.59, and 1545.61 cm−1, and in-plane bending vibration was computed at 1211.25 cm−1.
3.3. Photovoltaic Characterization
The following formula is used to calculate the maximum power photo-to-electric conversion efficiency (η) [43]:(4)η=Jsc·Voc·FFP.Here, P was the intensity of the incident light; Jsc, Voc, and FF represent short circuit density, open circuit voltage, and fill factor, respectively.
The FF was defined as the ratio of the maximum power Pmax obtained from the DSSCs and the theoretical maximum power of it [44]. Hence,(5)FF=Im·VmJsc·Voc.Here, Im and Vm were current and voltage related to the maximum power. In the experiment, we used the phloxine B and bromophenol blue as sensitizers, to measure the current-voltage (I-V) under sunlight intensity of 100 mW cm−2. And the results are shown in Figure 6, and measured I-V characteristics of the DSSCs sensitized for the two dyes are listed in Table 2.
Current-voltage characteristics of phloxine B and bromophenol blue.
Voc (V)
Jsc (mA/cm2)
FF
η%
Phloxine B
0.61
1.31
0.65
0.52
Bromophenol blue
0.44
0.17
0.68
0.05
The photocurrent-potential (I-V) characteristics of the DSSCs with TiO2 film electrode sensitized by phloxine B and bromophenol blue.
The DSSCs sensitized with phloxine B showed η of 0.52%, with Voc of 0.61 V, Jsc of 1.31 mA cm−2, and FF of 0.65, while the DSSCs sensitized with bromophenol blue showed η of 0.05%, with Voc of 0.44 V, Jsc of 0.17 mA cm−2, and FF of 0.68. The results showed that photovoltaic performance of phloxine B is greater than that of bromophenol blue. Then Voc of the DSSCs using the phloxine B as sensitizer was more suitable. The photovoltaic performance of the phloxine B was higher than that of bromophenol blue. This improvement in the photovoltaic performance of the DSSCs with phloxine B could be attributed to the absorption spectra of solar radiations (450–600 nm) (see Figure 3(a)) [43]. This result indicated that the range of absorption spectra affected η of DSSCs.
To analyze the difference of two dyes, we performed theoretical calculation to explain the well photoelectric properties (larger Voc and Jsc) of phloxine B. The value of Voc was viewed as the difference between the quasi-Fermi level of semiconductor conduction band edge value and the electrolyte oxygen reductions. Because the electrolyte was typically I−/I3-, the redox electrolyte can be considered constant. The value of Voc has a direct dependence on the shift of the reduction potential of the semiconductor conduction band (ΔECB), and ΔECB is expressed [45]:(6)ΔECB=-qμnormalγε0ε,where γ is adsorbed on the surface concentration and μnormal is the dipole moment component perpendicular to the direction of TiO2 surface (where μnormal was the x-axis direction), ε0 is the gas permittivity, and ε is the dielectric constant of the organic monolayer. Obviously, according to (6), the larger the value of μnormal, the bigger the value of ΔECB. The change of ΔECB has direct influence on Voc. In order to analyze and compare Voc, we calculated μnormal, as shown in Figure 7. μnormal of phloxine B was 19.80 D, and μnormal of bromophenol blue was −1.29 D. μnormal of phloxine B was much larger than that of bromophenol blue. Therefore, the increasing μnormal for phloxine B results in the larger Voc [46, 47].
Dipole moment of phloxine B and bromophenol blue (gray for C, deep red for Br, red for O, green for Cl, blue for N, purple for Na, yellow for S, and white for H).
For the dye sensitizers, the light harvesting efficiency (LHE) and oscillator strength had correlated relationship [48], which is expressed as follows:(7)LHE=1-10-f.Here, f is the oscillator strength. According to Table 1, we found that the first excited state of phloxine B and bromophenol blue corresponds to a dominant position in absorption, and the oscillator strength of phloxine B was larger than that of bromophenol blue. The LHE of phloxine B was 0.8255, and that of bromophenol blue was 0.0714. So the correlated relationship between the oscillator strength and light harvesting efficiency (LHE) implied that the dye with larger oscillator strength made more LHE, and thus phloxine B has well utilities of sunlight.
The sunlight absorption and electron injection were important process in DSSCs, which obviously affect the efficiency of Jsc [49]. Driving force of electron injection (ΔGinject) means that the excited dye provided electron into semiconductor conduction band. Electron injection occurred from the excited state; ΔGinject could be calculated by the following equation [50]:(8)ΔGinject=EOXdye∗-ECBSC,where EOXdye∗ is the oxidation potential of the excited state of the dye, and ECBSC is the reduction potential of the semiconductor conduction band. The reported ECBSC = 4.0 eV [51] for TiO2 was adopted in this work. EOXdye∗ could be calculated as follows [52]:(9)EOXdye∗=EOXdye-λmax.Here EOXdye is the redox potential of the ground state, and λmax was the absorption maximum with ICT character.
The data of phloxine B and bromophenol blue were listed in Table 3. According to the calculation results, ΔGinject of phloxine B (−1.82 eV) was higher than bromophenol blue (−1.49 eV), meaning that ΔGinject of phloxine B was easier than bromophenol blue. ΔGinject was an important influence factor for the electron injection efficiency. At the same time, the LHE showed that phloxine B was stronger than bromophenol blue, as discussed above. Therefore, phloxine B has improved absorption and injection abilities in comparison with bromophenol blue, which cause the larger value of Jsc.
The driving force of electron injection ΔGinject (in eV) for the phloxine B and bromophenol blue in the solvent.
Dye
EOXdye
EOXdye∗
ΔGinject
Phloxine B
5.44
2.83
−1.82
Bromophenol blue
6.63
2.35
−1.49
3.4. Ground and Excited State Properties
To ensure that electrons could be effectively injected into the conduction band of TiO2 (about −4.0 eV) [51], LUMO energy level must be higher than the edge of the conduction band of the TiO2, and HOMO energy level must be below I−/I3- electrolyte (about −4.85 eV) [46]. Energy levels of MOs and energy gaps in solvent were studied by using DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d) method. Energy levels and HOMO-LUMO gap are presented in Figure 8, and the calculated data are listed in Table 4. For phloxine B, the highest occupied MO (HOMO) was −5.44 eV and the lowest unoccupied MO (LUMO) was −2.64 eV. For bromophenol blue, the HOMO was −6.63 eV and the LUMO was −1.77 eV. The band gap of phloxine B was smaller than that of bromophenol blue, meaning there is a red-shifted absorption for phloxine B. From Figure 8, it seems that the LUMOs of phloxine B and bromophenol blue were all higher than the conduction band of TiO2, meaning that the electron injection can occur from excited dyes into TiO2, and the HOMOs of two dyes were lower than I−/I3- (see Figure 8); therefore, two dyes can obtain electron to recovery.
Energy levels of HOMO, LUMO, and energy gaps in solvent (eV).
Phloxine B
Bromophenol blue
H
−5.44
−6.63
L
−2.64
−1.77
Gap
−2.80
−4.86
Energy levels of phloxine B and bromophenol blue in solvent.
Molecular nonlinear optical properties have a close relationship with external electric field. It reflects the characteristics of the intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), which can affect the electron injection efficiency and the light current. The first hyperpolarizability (β) is directly proportional to the difference in the dipole moment (Δμeg) between the ground state and the excited state and the transition dipole moment (μeg), and it is inversely proportional to the transition energy. The first hyperpolarizabilities could be written as follows [53]:(10)β∞Δμegμeg2Eeg2,where Δμeg and μeg are difference in the dipole moment for ground state and excited state and the transition dipole, Eeg, is transition energy. The first hyperpolarizabilities were calculated, as listed in Table 5. The βtot of phloxine B was higher than that of bromophenol blue. Table 1 and Figure 7 support the results of hyperpolarizabilities. Figure 7 showed that the value of μeg for phloxine B is larger than that of bromophenol blue; at the same time, phloxine B has smaller excitation energy, so phloxine B has larger hyperpolarizabilities with obvious ICT.
Hyperpolarizability of phloxine and bromophenol blue.
βxxx
βxxy
βxyy
βyyy
βxxz
βxyz
βyyz
βxzz
βyzz
βzzz
βtot
Phloxine B
1056.816
1811.374
−176.166
−1358.839
303.029
103.036
−151.766
−220.581
194.588
−334.674
942.390
Bromophenol blue
−166.629
263.472
−97.931
430.917
−91.126
−74.537
−118.993
37.162
73.307
−204.705
901.746
3.5. Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Dyes
Radiative lifetime (τ) played an important role in DSSCs, and it could affect charge recombination [54]. τ could be calculated as follows [55]:(11)τ=ac3u22fe2.Here, c is the speed of light, f is the oscillator strength, and e is the fluorescent energy. The experimental spectra of the phloxine B and bromophenol blue are shown in Figure 9, and the calculated fluorescence maxima λ, oscillator strength (f in a.u.), and relative radiative lifetime are listed in Table 6. The maximum absorption peak of phloxine B was 507 nm. The fluorescence energy, oscillator strength, and radiative lifetime were 2.45 eV, 0.6268, and 6.14 × 10−9 s, respectively. The absorption peak of bromophenol blue was 385 nm. The fluorescence energy, oscillator strength, and radiative lifetime were 3.22 eV, 0.0085, and 2.61 × 10−7 s, respectively. The radiative lifetime of bromophenol blue was higher (2.61 × 10−7 s). But phloxine B was propitious to charge recombination [54].
The calculated electron radiative lifetime (τ) for the phloxine B and bromophenol blue in the solvent.
Dye
E (eV)
λ (nm)
Strength f
τ (s)
Phloxine B
2.45
507
0.6268
6.14 × 10−9
Bromophenol blue
3.22
385
0.0085
2.61 × 10−7
Fluorescence spectra of phloxine B and bromophenol blue.
4. Conclusion
The absorption, molecular orbital energies, radiative lifetimes, LHE, and ΔGinject were addressed. The oscillator strength (0.7582), vertical dipole moment (19.80 D), and ΔGinject (−1.82 eV) for phloxine B were higher than those of bromophenol blue. The Jsc, Voc, and η of phloxine B were 0.61 V, 1.31 mA/cm2, and 0.52%, respectively, which were higher than those of bromophenol blue. The results showed that higher dipole moment of phloxine B corresponds to larger Voc. This means that enlarging dipole moment was a possible way to increase Voc of DSSCs. The larger oscillator strength, higher LHE, and larger absolute value of ΔGinject correspond to larger Jsc. This means increasing oscillator strength and LHE and larger absolute value of ΔGinject were a possible way to increase Jsc. A similar trend between theory and experiment was observed. Photovoltaic performance of phloxine B was significantly higher than that of bromophenol blue.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant no. 2572014CB31), the Heilongjiang Provincial Youth Science Foundation (Grant no. QC2013C006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11404055 and 11374353), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M590270), Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Grant (LBH-Z15002), National Undergraduate Innovative and Entrepreneurial Training Program (Grant no. 201610225099), and Academic Research Training of NEFU for Undergraduate (Grant no. KY2015020).
O'ReganB.GraetzelM.A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal titanium dioxide films1991353634673774010.1038/353737a0GrätzelM.Photoelectrochemical cells200141468613383441171354010.1038/351046072-s2.0-003589113811713540WeiD.Dye sensitized solar cells2010113110311132048000310.3390/ijms110311032-s2.0-7795089457220480003NazeeruddinM. K.KleinC.LiskaP.GrätzelM.Synthesis of novel ruthenium sensitizers and their application in dye-sensitized solar cells200524913-141460146710.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.0252-s2.0-23044469901LiB.WangL.KangB.WangP.QiuY.Review of recent progress in solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells200690554957310.1016/j.solmat.2005.04.0392-s2.0-31544476266RobertsonN.Optimizing dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells200645152338234510.1002/anie.2005030832-s2.0-33746271910SasaniA.BaktashA.MirabbaszadehK.KhoshnevisanB.Structural and electronic properties of Mg and Mg-Nb co-doped TiO2 (101) anatase surface201638429830310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.040GledhillS. E.ScottB.GreggB. A.Organic and nano-structured composite photovoltaics: an overview200520123167317910.1557/jmr.2005.04072-s2.0-30444438308MagniM.BiaginiP.ColomboA.DragonettiC.RobertoD.ValoreA.Versatile copper complexes as a convenient springboard for both dyes and redox mediators in dye sensitized solar cells2016322699310.1016/j.ccr.2016.05.008GrätzelM.The advent of mesoscopic injection solar cells200614542944210.1002/pip.7122-s2.0-33746077183MishraA.FischerM. K. R.BüuerleP.Metal-free organic dyes for dye-Sensitized solar cells: from structure: property relationships to design rules200948142474249910.1002/anie.2008047092-s2.0-70349784869NingZ.TianH.Triarylamine: a promising core unit for efficient photovoltaic materials200945375483549510.1039/b908802d2-s2.0-70349270760ZakeeruddinS. M.GrätzelM.Solvent-free ionic liquid electrolytes for mesoscopic dye-sensitized solar cells200919142187220210.1002/adfm.2009003902-s2.0-67651213673ChangH.LoY.-J.Pomegranate leaves and mulberry fruit as natural sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells201084101833183710.1016/j.solener.2010.07.0092-s2.0-77956169941ZhangG.BalaH.ChengY.ShiD.LvX.YuQ.WangP.High efficiency and stable dye-sensitized solar cells with an organic chromophore featuring a binary π-conjugated spacer2009162198220010.1039/b822325d2-s2.0-64549140360TorchaniA.SaadaouiS.GharbiR.FathallahM.Sensitized solar cells based on natural dyes201515330731210.1016/j.cap.2015.01.0032-s2.0-84920705052ZhouH.WuL.GaoY.MaT.Dye-sensitized solar cells using 20 natural dyes as sensitizers20112192-318819410.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.02.0082-s2.0-79954965378WangZ.-S.CuiY.HaraK.Dan-OhY.KasadaC.ShinpoA.A high-light-harvesting-efficiency coumarin dye for stable dye-sensitized solar cells20071981138114110.1002/adma.2006010202-s2.0-34249784386WangC.-L.LanC.-M.HongS.-H.WangY.-F.PanT.-Y.ChangC.-W.KuoH.-H.KuoM.-Y.DiauE. W.-G.LinC.-Y.Enveloping porphyrins for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells2012556933694010.1039/c2ee03308a2-s2.0-84860354803GriffithM. J.SunaharaK.WagnerP.WagnerK.WallaceG. G.OfficerD. L.FurubeA.KatohR.MoriS.MozerA. J.Porphyrins for dye-sensitised solar cells: new insights into efficiency-determining electron transfer steps201248354145416210.1039/c2cc30677h2-s2.0-84859328853CampbellW. M.BurrellA. K.OfficerD. L.JolleyK. W.Porphyrins as light harvesters in the dye-sensitised TiO2 solar cell200424813-141363137910.1016/j.ccr.2004.01.0072-s2.0-4644304103KudoK.YagetaH.KuniyoshiS.TanakaK.Surface pressure variation in triphenylmethane dye adsorbed merocyanine monolayers at the air-water interface19933241775177810.1143/jjap.32.17752-s2.0-0027575892CleinmensenS.JensenJ. C.JensenN. J.MeyerO.OlsenP.WürtzenG.Toxicological studies on malachite green: a triphenylmethane dye1984561434510.1007/bf003163512-s2.0-0021746282LiG.LiangM.WangH.SunZ.WangL.WangZ.XueS.Significant enhancement of open-circuit voltage in indoline-based dye-sensitized solar cells via retarding charge recombination20132591713172210.1021/cm400196w2-s2.0-84877730701HamH. W.KimY. S.Theoretical study of indoline dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells2010518226558656310.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.0482-s2.0-77956056392MaX.HuaJ.WuW.JinY.MengF.ZhanW.TianH.A high-efficiency cyanine dye for dye-sensitized solar cells200864234535010.1016/j.tet.2007.10.0942-s2.0-36448929096TangJ.WuW.HuaJ.LiJ.LiX.TianH.Starburst triphenylamine-based cyanine dye for efficient quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells20092998299010.1039/b906596b2-s2.0-69249229762LiY.PulleritsT.ZhaoM.SunM.Theoretical characterization of the PC60BM:PDDTT model for an organic solar cell201111544218652187310.1021/jp20406962-s2.0-80455129711CeylanÜ.TarıG. Ö.GökceH.AğarE.Spectroscopic (FT-IR and UV-Vis) and theoretical (HF and DFT) investigation of 2-Ethyl-N-[(5-nitrothiophene-2-yl)methylidene]aniline2016111011010.1016/j.molstruc.2016.01.019SasE. B.KurtM.CanM.HorzumN.AtacA.Spectroscopic studies on 9H-carbazole-9-(4-phenyl) boronic acid pinacol ester by DFT method2016111812413810.1016/j.molstruc.2016.03.064Soleimani AmiriS.MakaremS.AhmarH.AshenagarS.Theoretical studies and spectroscopic characterization of novel 4-methyl-5-((5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl)thio)benzene-1,2-diol20161119182410.1016/j.molstruc.2016.04.053Al-SehemiA. G.IrfanA.AsiriA. M.AmmarY. A.Synthesis, characterization and DFT study of methoxybenzylidene containing chromophores for DSSC materials20129123924310.1016/j.saa.2012.01.0162-s2.0-84859074851KumaraN. T. R. N.KoohM. R. R.LimA.PetraM. I.VooN. Y.LimC. M.EkanayakeP.DFT/TDDFT and experimental studies of natural pigments extracted from black tea waste for DSSC application20132013810984310.1155/2013/1098432-s2.0-84885407199BeniA. S.ZarandiM.Application of DFT and MP2 calculations on structural and water-assisted proton transfer in 3-amino-4-nitrofurazan201690237438210.1134/s00360244151300382-s2.0-84954096739El-ShishtawyR. M.ElrobyS. A.AsiriA. M.MullenK.Optical absorption spectra and electronic properties of symmetric and asymmetric squaraine dyes for use in DSSC solar cells: DFT and TD-DFT studies201617448710.3390/ijms17040487SunC. F.LiY. Z.QiD. W.LiH. X.SongP.Optical and electrical properties of purpurin and alizarin complexone as sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells20162788027803910.1007/s10854-016-4799-4LiY. Z.SunC. F.QiD. W.SongP.MaF. C.Effects of different functional groups on the optical and charge transport properties of copolymers for polymer solar cells2016666618096182010.1039/c6ra07647eSongP.LiY.MaF.PulleritsT.SunM.Photoinduced electron transfer in organic solar cells201616273475310.1002/tcr.2015002442-s2.0-84958554680KohnW.ShamL. J.Quantum density oscillations in an inhomogeneous electron gas19651376A1697A170510.1103/physrev.137.a16972-s2.0-36149025273LeeC.YangW.ParrR. G.Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density1988372785789KleinmanD. A.Nonlinear dielectric polarization in optical media196212661977197910.1103/physrev.126.19772-s2.0-33746307948FrischM. J.TrucksG. W.SchlegelH. B.2009Wallingford, Conn, USAGaussian Inc.KushwahaS.BahadurL.Enhancement of power conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells by co-sensitization of Phloxine B and Bromophenol blue dyes on ZnO photoanode201516142643010.1016/j.jlumin.2015.01.0542-s2.0-84923166281LiW.WangJ.ChenJ.BaiF.-Q.ZhangH.-X.Theoretical investigation of triphenylamine-based sensitizers with different π-spacers for DSSC20141181144115110.1016/j.saa.2013.09.0802-s2.0-84886194322LiangM.ChenJ.Arylamine organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells20134283453348810.1039/c3cs35372a2-s2.0-84877742813RühleS.GreenshteinM.ChenS.-G.MersonA.PizemH.SukenikC. S.CahenD.ZabanA.Molecular adjustment of the electronic properties of nanoporous electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells200510940189071891310.1021/jp05141232-s2.0-27144539536NingZ.FuY.TianH.Improvement of dye-sensitized solar cells: what we know and what we need to know2010391170118110.1039/c003841e2-s2.0-77956112581PreatJ.JacqueminD.PerpèteE. A.Towards new efficient dye-sensitised solar cells20103789190410.1039/c000474j2-s2.0-77954128078MarinadoT.HagbergD. P.HedlundM.EdvinssonT.JohanssonE. M. J.BoschlooG.RensmoH.BrinckT.SunL.HagfeldtA.Rhodanine dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: spectroscopy, energy levels and photovoltaic performance200911113314110.1039/b812154k2-s2.0-57449121558PreatJ.MichauxC.JacqueminD.PerpèteE. A.Enhanced efficiency of organic dye-sensitized solar cells: triphenylamine derivatives200911338168211683310.1021/jp904946a2-s2.0-70349866147AsburyJ. B.WangY.-Q.HaoE.GhoshH. N.LianT.Evidences of hot excited state electron injection from sensitizer molecules to TiO2 nanocrystalline thin films2001274-539340610.1163/1568567011042022552-s2.0-0034831038KatohR.FurubeA.YoshiharaT.HaraK.FujihashiG.TakanoS.MurataS.ArakawaH.TachiyaM.Efficiencies of electron injection from excited N3 dye into nanocrystalline semiconductor (ZrO2, TiO2, ZnO, Nb2O5, SnO2, In2O3) Films2004108154818482210.1021/jp031260g2-s2.0-2342501913OlbrechtsG.MuntersT.ClaysK.PersoonsA.KimO.-K.ChoiL.-S.High-frequency demodulation of multi-photon fluorescence in hyper-Rayleigh scattering199912222122410.1016/S0925-3467(99)00060-92-s2.0-0032599654ZhangC.-R.LiuL.ZheJ.-W.JinN.-Z.MaY.YuanL.-H.ZhangM.-L.WuY.-Z.LiuZ.-J.ChenH.-S.The role of the conjugate bridge in electronic structures and related properties of tetrahydroquinoline for dye sensitized solar cells20131435461548110.3390/ijms140354612-s2.0-84875060539Le BahersT.PauportéT.ScalmaniG.AdamoC.CiofiniI.A TD-DFT investigation of ground and excited state properties in indoline dyes used for dye-sensitized solar cells20091147112761128410.1039/b914626a2-s2.0-73149102072