International Journal of Polymer Science

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 893542, 9 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/893542

Research Article

Evaluation of Some Conducting Polymers as Novel Antioxidants for Rubber Vulcanizates

M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar,¹ K. A. Shaffei,² and Nourelhoda Abdelwahab¹

¹Department of Polymers and Pigments, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt

²Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt

Received 2 July 2013; Revised 25 August 2013; Accepted 21 September 2013; Published 9 February 2014

Academic Editor: Ali Akbar Entezami

Copyright © 2014 M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Natural rubber (NR) and styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) formulations containing polyaromatic and polyheterocyclic amine homopolymers and copolymers were prepared. The studied homopolymers named polythiophene (PT), poly(o-phenylene diamine) (Po-PDA) and copolymers named poly(aniline-co-m-toluidine) (PAn-co-mT), poly(aniline-co-o-phenylene diamine) (PAn-co-o-PDA), poly(aniline-co-thiophene) (PAn-co-T), poly(aniline-co-2-amino pyridine) (PAn-co-2APy), and poly(2-amino pyridine-co-o-phenylene diamine) (P2APy-co-o-PDA) have been prepared and characterized. The rheological characteristics and physicomechanical properties of the compounded rubber mixes and vulcanizates were investigated and determined. The effects of the prepared polymers on the ageing characteristics of corresponding vulcanizates were evaluated. It was found that the prepared polymers have shown better antioxidant efficiency than the conventional antioxidants phenyl β naphthyl amine (PβN) and the polymerized-2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (TMQ) industrially used in addition to their safety and ecofriendliness to the environment.

1. Introduction

Natural rubber like any other organic polymer is susceptible to oxidative degradation, which results in loss of physical and mechanical properties. Its oxidation arises from the formation of peroxy-free radicals that can propagate scission reactions of the rubber molecule [1, 2]. Antioxidants, either natural or synthetic, are essential additives to retard this oxidation reaction.

Antioxidants can be classified according to the way by which they interfere with the oxidation of the polymer as follows.

(a) Chain breaking donors (CB-D) are those which are capable of competing with the substrate (RH) for the alkyl peroxy radicals [1]. The hindered phenols and aromatic amines such as substituted p-phenylene diamine [3] are the most important of these antioxidants. Some biological antioxidants such as tocopherols (vitamin E) also act by CB-D mechanism:

(b) Chain breaking acceptors (CB-A) are antioxidants which can compete with oxygen for the alkyl radicals. Quinones [4], nitro compounds, and stable oxyradicals are considered as CB-A antioxidants (1):

(c) Preventive antioxidants decompose hydroperoxides by a process which does not give rise to free radicals or that can stabilize the hydroperoxide. The phosphite esters and a whole family of sulfur-containing compounds are among this set of compounds [1, 5–7] (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Abad et al. [3] used natural antioxidants for radiation vulcanization of natural rubber; among these were cystine, tyrosine, asparagines, phenyl alanine, and alanine.

Kuriakose et al. [7] used rice bran oil as a novel compounding ingredient in sulfur vulcanization of natural rubber.

It is known that serious drawbacks of all antioxidants existing today are volatility and extractability. The decrease in concentration of the antioxidants impairs the resistance to degradation. One method to increase the persistence of the antioxidant in polymer is to use high molecular weight compounds which cannot migrate to the rubber surface and hence cannot be lost by volatilization [8].

Polyanilines are compounds which recently find wide applications. Polyanilines prepared by chemical oxidation processes for application as conducting polymers [9], and efficient corrosion inhibitors for steel protection [10], in addition to their synergistic antioxidant efficiency for NR and SBR vulcanizates as reported in our previous studies [11–13].

The present study aims to prepare and evaluate the previously mentioned homopolymers and copolymers of polyaromatic amines, polyheterocyclic compounds as antioxidants for SBR vulcanizates, and the role of chemical structure on their efficiencies.

2. Experimental

Two homopolymers, polythiophene (PT) and poly(o-phenylene diamine) (Po-PDA), and five copolymers, poly (aniline-co-m-toluidine) (PAn-co-mT), poly (aniline-co-o-phenylene diamine) (PAn-co-o-PDA), poly(aniline-co-thiophene) (PAn-co-T), poly(aniline-co-2amino pyridine) (PAn-co-2APy), and poly (2-amino pyridine-co-o-phenylene diamine) (P2APy-co-o-PD), were synthesized and characterized using spectrophotometric measurements (IR-UV-Vis) and thermal analysis. The methods of preparation and characterization were reported by Abd El-Ghaffar et al. in previous publications [8–13] and can be summarized as follows.

2.1. Preparation of (PT) and (Po-PDA) Homopolymers

0.01 mol of the conducting monomer in 50 mL of the suitable solvent and 0.01 mol of ammonium peroxydisulphate initiator was dissolved in 50 mL distilled water. The initiator solution was dropwised into the monomer solution with continuous stirring for two hours at temperature range 0–5°C.

The precipitated conducting polymer was left for 24 hours, filtered, and washed several times with distilled water, methanol and dried at 50°C under vacuum. The yield ≥90% was characterized, examined for physical properties, and evaluated as antioxidants for NR and SBR vulcanizates.

2.2. Preparation of Various Conducting Copolymers

0.05 mol of aniline in 50 mL methanol and 0.05 mol of m-toluidine in 50 mL methanol were mixed. To this blend of the two conducting monomer solutions was added dropwise with continuous stirring at 0–5°C (0.1 mol, 22.819 gm) of ammonium peroxydisulphate initiator in 50 mL distilled water with continuous stirring for 6 hours and left overnight. The copolymer was filtered off and the precipitate was washed several times with distilled water, methanol, and ethanol; after that the precipitate was subjected for drying under vacuum in an electric oven at 50°C. The precipitate was characterized, examined for physical properties, and evaluated as antioxidant for NR and SBR vulcanizates.

The previous steps were repeated for all previously mentioned copolymers.

The rubber samples used in this investigation were natural rubber (SMR-20) and styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR-1502).

The accelerator was N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulphenamide (CBS), and the activator used in this study was stearic acid and zinc oxide.

Elemental sulfur was used as curing agent.

The mixes were prepared on a two-roll mill. The rheometric properties of the rubber mixes were determined by using Monsanto Oscillating Disc Rheometer [14]. The compounded rubber was vulcanized in a hydraulic press at 152°C. The physicomechanical characteristics were determined according to standard methods [15]. The vulcanizates were subjected to thermal oxidative ageing [16] in an oven at 90°C for different time periods. The ageing data were compared with those of vulcanizates containing the antioxidant phenyl β naphthyl amine (PβN). The equilibrium swelling was carried out in toluene [17] according to ASTM method D471 (2006).

The conducting polymers showing the best antioxidant results for NR and SBR vulcanizates were tested for ageing and subjected to UV for 72 hr using UV lamp (120 w), in comparison with the antioxidants (PβN) and 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline polymer (TMQ) as commercial stabilizers (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of the Prepared Homopolymers and Copolymers on the Properties of Natural Rubber Mixes

The prepared homopolymers and copolymers were incorporated in natural rubber mixes in a suitable dose (1 phr) compared with phenyl-β-naphthyl amine (PβN), the commercial antioxidant which is widely used in rubber industry.

The mixing process was carried out on a laboratory mill according to the usual regime. The rubber formulations are given in Table 1.

Table 1: Rubber formulations containing the prepared homopolymers and copolymers.

Formulation no.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Control (without)

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

PN
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Po-PDA
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—

PT
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—

P(An-co-mT)
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—

P(An-co-T)
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—

P(An-co-o-PDA)
—
—
—
—
—

1

—
—

P(An-co-2APy)
—
—
—
—
—

—
1
—

P(2APy-co-o-PDA)
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
1

Base recipe (phr): NR, 100; stearic acid, 2; zinc oxide, 5; HAF, 30; processing oil, 3; CBS, 1; S, 2.

The rheological characteristics of the mixes were determined using an oscillating disc rheometer at °C and are given in Table 2.

Table 2: Rheometric characteristics and physico-mechanical properties of NR vulcanizates containing the prepared homopolymers and copolymers.

Property
Formulation no.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Rheometric characteristics at 142°C ± 1°C

Minimum torque, , dN·m
1.5
1
1
1
1.5
1
1
1
1.5

Maximum torque, , dN·m
64
66
66
70
68
72
68
67
66

Optimum cure time, , min
18
15
15
12
12
11
13
14
14

Scorch time, , min
8
6.5
5
5
6
5
6.5
4.5
6

Cure rate index, CRT, min⁻¹
10
11.76
10
14.29
16.67
16.67
15.38
11.76
12.5

Physicomechanical properties at the optimum cure time

Stress at yield, , MPa
20.4
22.3
22
25.36
23.23
28.11
23.2
22.52
22.18

Stress at rupture, , MPa
19.3
21.2
21.8
25.11
23.11
27.4
22.05
22.33
21.83

Strain at yield, , %
496
530
525
645
539
650
535
530
530

Strain at rupture, , %
503
540
530
647
541
670
540
533
531

Equilibrium swelling, Q%
325
270
259
225
232
219
243
248
252

: minimum torque; : maximum torque; : cure time to 90% of full torque development.

: cure time; : scorch time to 2 units of torque increase above minimum torque.

CRI: cure rate index: 100/(−).

The physicomechanical properties of the vulcanizates were determined and are also given in Table 2.

From these data, it is clear that the prepared homopolymers and copolymers had an accelerating effect as shown from the decrease in the optimum cure time and the increase in cure rate index. On the other hand, it is obvious from the results of mechanical properties given also in Table 2 and illustrated in Figures 1, 2, and 3 that the prepared homopolymers and copolymers increased stress at yield, stress at rupture, strain at yield, and strain at rupture while decreasing equilibrium swelling which indicates that these polymers can act also as secondary stabilizers.

Figure 1: Retained strain at rupture versus ageing time for NR vulcanizates.

Figure 2: Retained stress at rupture versus ageing time for NR vulcanizates.

Figure 3: Retained equilibrium swelling versus ageing time for NR vulcanizates.

3.2. Effect of the Prepared Homopolymers and Copolymers as Antioxidants in Natural Rubber Mixes

Oxidative ageing of elastomers is a very serious problem; during the ageing process, small amounts of oxygen are absorbed by natural or synthetic rubbers or by their vulcanizates. This causes a considerable change in their physicomechanical properties; consequently, it is necessary to protect rubber articles from oxidative ageing by adding compounds called “antioxidants” to rubber mixes.

The addition of antioxidants to rubber mixes can prolong the service life of the rubber vulcanizates; however, the efficiency of an antioxidant depends on different factors such as the type of rubber, the type of ageing, and the nature of the other rubber ingredients in the mix.

The efficiency of the antioxidants also greatly depends on their chemical structure.

In view of the above, the natural rubber mixes shown in Table 1 were vulcanized at °C for their optimum cure time. The rubber samples were subjected to thermal oxidative ageing in an oven at 90°C ± 1°C for different time periods.

The physicomechanical properties of the aged samples were determined and the retained values of each property were calculated and represented in Figures 2 and 3. From these figures, it is clear that the retained values of tensile strength and elongation at break depend on the ageing time.

From these results, it is obvious that the prepared homopolymers and copolymers are more efficient to protect natural rubber vulcanizates against thermal ageing, practically to higher levels than the widely used antioxidant PBN and to some extent in case of TMQ.

Figure 3 depicts the dependence of the retained values of equilibrium swelling in toluene as a function of ageing time.

From the obtained results the efficiency of the prepared homopolymers and copolymers can be arranged in the following order:

P(An-co-T) > PT > P(An-co-mT) > P(An-co-o-PDA) > P(An-co-2APy) > P(o-PDA-co-2APy) > Po-PDA = PβN > control (without antioxidant).

It is quite evident that poly(aniline-co-thiophene) had the highest efficiency as antioxidant and this is due to a mixed mechanism including the liability of hydrogen in polyaniline moiety which blocks the peroxide radicals in addition to hydroperoxide decomposition in case of the polythiophene moiety. These results are in accordance with the results reported by Drake et al. [18] (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3: Mechanism of polythiophene as an antioxidant (hydroperoxide decomposition reactions in presence of polythiophene).

On the other hand, polythiophene also produces good results due to high conjugation of thiophene ring which attracts the lone pair of electrons of sulfur to a great extent, which causes deficiency of electrons on sulfur atom, so that sulfur atom could capture the growing radicals formed on rubber molecules stopping the oxidation of rubber.

The structures of poly(aniline-co-thiophene) P(An-co-T) and polythiophene (PT) are illustrated in Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

3.3. Effect of the Prepared Homopolymers and Copolymers on the Properties of Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR)

The prepared homopolymers and copolymers were incorporated in SBR mixes and compared with the commercial antioxidant PβN as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: SBR formulations containing the prepared homopolymers and copolymers.

Formulation no.
1′
2′
3′
4′
5′
6′
7′
8′
9′

Control (without)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

PN
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

Po-PDA
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—

PT
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—

P(An-co-mT)
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—

P(An-co-T)
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—

P(An-co-o-PDA)
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—

P(An-co-2APy)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—

P(2APy-co-o-PDA)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1

Base recipe (phr): SBR, 100; stearic acid, 2; zinc oxide, 5; HAF, 30; processing oil, 3; CBS, 1; S, 2.

The rheometer characteristics of the rubber mixes were determined at 152°C ± 1 using Monsanto Oscillating Disc Rheometer 100. The samples were vulcanized at °C for their optimum cure time and their physicomechanical properties were determined.

Table 4 shows the rheometer characteristics as well as the physicomechanical properties of the rubber samples.

Table 4: Rheometric characteristics and physico-mechanical properties of SBR vulcanizates containing the prepared homopolymers and copolymers.

Property
Formulation no.

1′
2′
3′
4′
5′
6′
7′
8′
9′

Rheometric characteristics at °C

Minimum torque, , dN·m
13
12
12
11
11
11
11
11
12

Maximum torque, , dN·m
65
69
65
74
72
79.5
71.5
69
69

Optimum cure time, , min
25
22.5
24
18
18
17
19
21
23

Scorch time, , min
5.5
5.0
6.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.5
5.5
5.5

Cure rate index, CRT, min⁻¹
5.13
5.71
5.56
7.14
7.14
7.14
6.9
6.45
5.71

Physicomechanical properties at the optimum cure time

Stress at yield, , Pa
15.28
17.2
17.58
24.4
22.35
26.12
21.8
19.5
18.86

Stress at rupture, , MPa
15.01
16.34
17.06
23.83
21.4
25.8
20.2
18.47
17.2

Strain at yield, , %
325
368
370
451
430
480
423
410
380

Strain at rupture, , %
338
372
375
460
444
483
420
417
383

Equilibrium swelling, Q%
335
318
283
240
251
234
259
268
275

From the data given in Table 4, it is clearly seen that the prepared homopolymers and copolymers decreased the optimum cure time and increased the cure rate index. This indicates that these compounds had an accelerating effect.

Also, it is clearly noticed that the prepared polymers increased the stress at yield, stress at rupture, strain at yield, and strain at rupture while they decreased the equilibrium swelling.

From these results, the prepared polymers may be used as antioxidants in SBR vulcanizates. This is due to the presence of reactive centers in their chemical structures, in addition to double bonds.

Thus, the evaluation of the prepared homopolymers and copolymers as antioxidants for SBR vulcanizates is very interesting.

3.4. Effect of the Prepared Homopolymers and Copolymers as Antioxidants in Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR) Mixes

From the previous study, it was found that the prepared homopolymers and copolymers proved themselves to be compounds of the highest efficiency as antioxidants in SBR vulcanizates. Thus, it is of great interest to study the effect of these compounds as antioxidants for the synthetic styrene-butadiene rubber.

The rubber samples were vulcanized at their optimum cure time. The vulcanizates were subjected to thermal ageing at 90°C in an electric oven, as previously described, for different periods of time.

The physicomechanical properties of the aged samples were determined and the retained values of each property were calculated.

Figures 4 and 5 represent the dependence of both stress and strain at rupture on the ageing time for rubber samples containing the investigated homopolymers and copolymers.

Figure 4: Retained strain at rupture versus ageing time for SBR vulcanizates.

Figure 5: Retained stress at rupture versus ageing time for SBR vulcanizates.

The obtained results of equilibrium swelling as shown in Figure 6 also ensure the above results.

Figure 6: Retained equilibrium swelling versus ageing time for SBR vulcanizates.

From the previous ageing results of NR and SBR, it is clearly seen that poly(aniline-co-thiophene) and polythiophene can be considered as the most efficient antioxidants in comparison with other prepared homopolymers and copolymers. These two polymers were examined for their antioxidant performance and UV stabilization in comparison with the commercial antioxidants PβN and TMQ. The formulations are given in Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5: NR formulations containing the prepared P(An-co-T) and PT.

Formulation no.
10
11
12
13
14

Control (without)
—
—
—
—
—

PN
—
1
—
—
—

TMQ
—
—
1
—
—

P(An-co-T)
—
—
—
1
—

PT
—
—
—
—
1

Rheometric characteristics at °C

Minimum torque, , dN·m
2
1
1
1
1

Maximum torque, , dN·m
70
69
69.5
70
72

Optimum cure time, , min
13
12
11
12
11

Physicomechanical properties at the optimum cure time

Stress at rupture, , MPa
17.84
18.75
19.8
27.4
25.10

Strain at rupture, , %
765
857
705
670
647

Base recipe (phr): NR, 100; stearic acid, 2; zinc oxide, 5; HAF, 30; processing oil, 3; CBS, 1; S, 2.

Table 6: SBR Formulations containing prepared P(An-co-T) and PT.

Formulation no.
15
16
17
18
19

Control (without)
—
—
—
—
—

PN
—
1
—
—
—

TMQ
—
—
1
—
—

P(An-co-T)
—
—
—
1
—

PT
—
—
—
—
1

Rheometric characteristics at °C

Minimum torque, , dN·m
2
1
1
1
1

Maximum torque, , dN·m
70
69
69.5
70
72

Optimum cure time, , min
13
12
11
12
11

Physicomechanical properties at the optimum cure time

Stress at rupture, , MPa
15.61
15.93
15.97
27.4
25.10

Strain at rupture, , %
624
662
651
670
647

Base recipe (phr): SBR, 100; stearic acid, 2; zinc oxide, 5; HAF, 30; processing oil, 3; CBS, 1; S, 2.

The results of retained stress at rupture and retained strain at rupture for aged NR and SBR vulcanizates are illustrated in Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10, respectively.

Figure 7: Retained stress at rupture versus ageing time for NR vulcanizates.

Figure 8: Retained strain at rupture versus ageing time for NR vulcanizates.

Figure 9: Retained stress at rupture versus ageing time for SBR vulcanizates.

Figure 10: Retained strain at rupture versus ageing time for SBR vulcanizates.

From these results it is clearly seen that the prepared polymers of P(An-co-T) and PT have shown outstanding properties which are more superior than the commercial antioxidants PβN and TMQ. These polymers are safe and environmentally acceptable [8, 10] and characterized with their easy method for preparation.

3.5. Effect of UV Exposure [19] on the Properties of Rubber Vulcanizates Containing P(An-co-T) and PT in Comparison with PβN and TMQ

The rubber vulcanizates of control and those containing 1 phr of the polymers P(An-co-T), PT compared with PβN and TMQ were subjected to UV irradiation for 72 hrs. The mechanical properties of the exposed samples (mainly stress at rupture and strain at rupture) were examined and evaluated and showed better results than PβN and TMQ. The data are given in Table 7.

Table 7: Retained stress and strain at rupture for NR and SBR vulcanizates containing the commercial antioxidants PN, TMQ and prepared polymers of P(An-co-T) and PT after exposure to UV irradiation for 72 hr.

Formulation property
NR vulcanizates
SBR vulcanizates

Control
PN
TMQ
P(An-co-T)
PT
Control
PN
TMQ
P(An-co-T)
PT

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Ret. stress at rupt., % after 72 hr UV exposure
89
98
100
100
100
90
99
93
100
100

Ret. strain at rupt., % after 72 hr UV exposure
90
98
100
100
100
91
99
94
100
100

4. Conclusions

Some conducting polymers include poly(aniline-co-thiophene), poly(aniline-co-2-amino pyridine), poly(2-amino pyridine-co-o-phenylene diamine), and poly(thiophene) were prepared and characterized. The polymers were examined for their antioxidant efficiency and UV protection for NR and SBR vulcanizates compared with the commercial antioxidants PβN and TMQ. The prepared polymers of P(An-co-T) and PT showed high antioxidant performance exceeding the commercial antioxidants, in addition to their safety, environmental acceptance, and easy way of preparation. The data indicated also that the polymers can act as secondary accelerators in addition to their antioxidant efficiency.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

S. Al-Malaika, “Mechanisms of antioxidant action and stabilisation technology—the Aston experience,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 34, no. 1–3, pp. 1–36, 1991.

D. Barnard and P. M. Lewis, “Oxidative aging,” Natural Rubber Science & Technology, pp. 621–675, 1988.

L. V. Abad, L. S. Relleve, C. T. Aranilla, A. K. Aliganga, C. M. San Diego, and A. M. Dela Rosa, “Natural antioxidants for radiation vulcanization of natural rubber latex,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 275–279, 2002.

M. W. Sabaa, T. M. Madkour, and A. A. Yassin, “Polymerization products of p-benzoquinone as bound antioxidants for blends of natural rubber,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 347–359, 1989.

M. Giurginca, J. M. Herdan, L. Cira, G. Vǎleanu, and G. Ivan, “Grafted mercapto-1,3,5-triazinic antioxidants for elastomers,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 53–57, 1992.

H. Meier, P. Dubs, H. Künzi et al., “Some aspects of a new class of sulfur containing phenolic antioxidants,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1995.

A. P. Kuriakose and G. Rajendran, “Rice bran oil as a novel compounding ingredient in sulphur vulcanization of natural rubber,” European Polymer Journal, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 595–602, 1995.

M. N. Ismail, M. S. Ibrahim, and M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar, “Polyaniline as an antioxidant and antirad in SBR vulcanizates,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 337–341, 1998.

M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar, N. A. Mohamed, A. A. Ghoneim, and K. A. Shaffei, “Characterization and electrical properties of some hydrochloric acid-doped aniline and 2-amino-pyridine homopolymers and copolymers,” Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 1327–1338, 2006.

M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar, E. A. M. Youssef, W. M. Darwish, and F. M. Helaly, “A novel series of corrosion inhibitive polymers for steel protection,” Journal of Elastomers and Plastics, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 68–94, 1998.

F. M. Helaly, W. M. Darwich, and M. A. Abd El-Ghaffar, “Effect of some polyaromatic amines on the properties of NR and SBR vulcanizates,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 251–257, 1999.

A. A. Wazzan, M. N. Ismail, and M. A. Abd El Ghaffar, “Evaluation of some polyaromatic amines as antirads and antifatigue agents in SBR vulcanizates,” International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 57–69, 2005.

M. N. Ismail, M. A. Abd El Ghaffar, K. A. Shaffei, and N. A. Mohamed, “Some novel polyamines as antioxidants for SBR vulcanizates,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 377–383, 1999.

ASTM D 2084-76T, “For determination of the rheometer characteristics using a Monsanto Oscillating Disc Rheometer, 100,” 1972

ASTM D 412-66T, “For determination of Physico-mechanical properties using Zwick tensile testing machine. (model 1425),” 1967

ASTM D 573, “For carrying out the ageing of samples in an electric oven,” 1952

ASTM D471, “For determination of swelling in toluene,” 2006

W. O. Drake, J. R. Pauquet, J. Zingg, and H. Zweifel, “Stabilization of polymeric materials state-of-the-art, scope and limitations,” Polymer Preprints, vol. 34, no. 2, p. 174, 1993.

H. Zweifel, Stabilization of Polymeric Materials, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1997.