International Journal of Polymer Science
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 7237236, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7237236

Research Article

Phosphorus Flame Retardants for Polymeric Materials from Gallic Acid and Other Naturally Occurring Multihydroxybenzoic Acids

Bob A. Howell, Kendahl L. Oberdorfer, and Eric A. Ostrander

Center for Applications in Polymer Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859-0001, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Bob A. Howell; bob.a.howell@cmich.edu

Received 24 May 2018; Revised 17 September 2018; Accepted 17 October 2018; Published 24 December 2018

Academic Editor: Jui-Yang Lai

Copyright © 2018 Bob A. Howell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The development of polymer and polymer additives from renewable biosources is becoming increasingly prominent. This reflects increasing concerns about sustainability, environmental quality, and human health. Bioproducts produced in nature are generally inexpensive and benign in the environment. Moreover, degradation of derivatives does not yield toxic products. Gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid) is found widely in nature and has long been touted for its medicinal qualities. 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid is also produced by several plants, most notably buckwheat. Both compounds, as the anilide and methyl ester, respectively, have been converted to a series of phosphorus esters, both phosphonate and phosphate. Esters have been fully characterized using spectroscopic and thermal methods. These compounds display good flame retardancy at low loadings in DGEBA epoxy resin.

1. Introduction

There is an increasing reliance on natural biosources as precursors to polymers and polymer additives [1–11]. This is particularly the case for plasticizers [12–14] and flame retardants [15–17]. These developments are driven by an increasing concern for sustainability, environmental quality, and human health. The release of potentially toxic agents into the environment is increasingly unacceptable. Traditionally, organohalogen compounds, particularly brominated aromatics, have been widely used as effective flame retardants [18]. However, these compounds often migrate from the polymer matrix into which they have been incorporated. Brominated aromatics are stable in the natural environment, tend to bioaccumulate, are increasingly finding their way into the human diet, and may pose health risks [18–22]. To reduce the propensity for migration from the polymer matrix, oligomeric flame retardants containing brominated units have been developed [23, 24]. These materials can function as effective flame retardants both in the presence and in the absence of an antimony oxide promoter. However, they suffer from the perception that halogens are undesirable established by the behavior of lower molecular weight counterparts. These smaller compounds continue to face increasing regulatory pressure and legislative restriction [25–27]. Replacements for these compounds are actively being sought. Phosphorus compounds offer great potential as acceptable flame retardants [28]. In general, phosphorous compounds are less toxic than the materials that they are replacing [29, 30]. Phosphorus flame retardants derived from renewable biomolecules are particularly attractive [17]. Starting materials obtained from natural sources are usually nontoxic and environmentally benign. Costs are independent of fluctuations in petrochemical markets.

Gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid) is widely produced in nature and may be extracted from gallnuts, oak bark, several legumes, grapes, berries, hickory nuts, and walnuts [31, 32]. Gallic acid has long been touted for its medicinal properties. When consumed, it acts as an antioxidant to help prevent potential cardiac dysfunction and the formation of radical oxygen species which disrupt cell membranes [33]. Many pharmaceuticals utilize the anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, and radio-protective nature of gallic acid for the treatment of a variety of diseases [34–36]. As a precursor to flame retardants, it offers three hydroxyl groups which may be subjected to esterification. Because the three hydroxyls occupy adjacent positions on the aromatic nucleus, it is not always possible to generate the corresponding triester, depending on the steric requirements of the groups being introduced. This may be overcome by first converting a gallic ester derivative to triacrylate followed by the Michael addition of phosphite [37]. Alternatively, a polyhydroxy aromatic acid with nonadjacent hydroxyl groups can be used. 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid is a naturally occurring acid found in numerous plants and grains, most notably buckwheat [38–41]. Both gallic acid and 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid have been converted to derivatives, analide and methyl ester, respectively, suitable for use as phosphorus ester precursors. The phosphorus esters generated display good flame-retarding properties in polymeric matrices.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

Common solvents and reagents were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific or the Aldrich Chemical Company. Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was distilled from lithium aluminum hydride prior to use, and methylene chloride from calcium hydride. Gallic acid, 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, carbon tetrachloride, triethylamine, diethylphosphite, and aniline were obtained from the Aldrich Chemical Company. 9,10-Dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO) was from TCI. Diphenyl chlorophosphate was provided by ICL-IP America Inc. The diglycidyl ether of bis-phenol A (DGEBA) was supplied by the Dow Chemical Company.

2.2. Methods and Instrumentation

General methods and instrumentation have been previously described [17, 42, 43]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained using a Varian Mercury 300 MHz or INOVA 500 MHz spectrometer. Tetramethylsilane was used as an internal reference () for proton and carbon spectra, and triphenylphosphate () for phosphorus spectra. Infrared spectra were recorded using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 380 FTIR spectrometer. Thermal transitions were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) using a TA Instruments Q2000 instrument. Thermal stability was assessed by thermogravimetry using a TA Instruments Q500 instrument. Peak heat release rates were determined using a microscale combustion calorimeter (ASTM D7309a) (Fire Testing Technology Ltd. (FTT)). Values reported are the averages of five determinations with a deviation of less than 5%. Limiting oxygen index values were determined using an FTT Oxygen Index unit (ASTM D2863-13). Vertical burn tests were conducted in an FTT test chamber (ASTM D2863-06).

2.3. Test Specimen

Samples for flammability testing were prepared as previously described [42].

2.4. Synthesis

2.4.1. 3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzanilide

Gallic acid chloride was synthesized by the dropwise addition, over a period of 0.25 hr, of 3.16 ml (44.3 mmol) of thionyl chloride to a solution of 5.03 g (29.6 mmol) of gallic acid and three drops of dimethylformamide in 20 ml of anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (THF) maintained near 0°C (external ice bath). Upon completion of the addition, the mixture was stirred near 0°C for an additional 0.25 hr. The progress of the reaction was monitored by periodic removal of aliquots for analysis using infrared spectroscopy. Upon observation of the complete conversion of acid to acid chloride, 10.8 ml (118.0 mmol) of aniline was added dropwise over a period of 0.25 hr to the stirred solution. Upon completion of the addition, the solution was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature. The progress of the reaction was monitored by periodic removal of an aliquot of the mixture for analysis using infrared spectroscopy. The reaction was completed within 12 hr. Anilinium chloride was removed by filtration at reduced pressure. The filtrate was diluted with 200 ml of ethyl acetate and washed, successively, with 50 ml of water, 50 ml of 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid solution, 50 ml of 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, and 50 ml of saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution. The ethyl acetate solution was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure. The residual solid was recrystallized from water to afford 6.37 g (88.1% yield) of 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzanilide as a pale yellow solid: mp 210°C (DSC); ESI-MS, 246 g/mol; IR (cm⁻¹) 3490 (s) N-H, 3533 (s, broad) O-H, 1636 (s) amide C=O, 1593 (s) aromatic nucleus; ¹H-NMR ( DMSO-d₆) 7.26 (m, 7H), 8.78 (s, 1H), 9.14 (s, 2H), 9.87 (s, 1H); ¹³C NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 127.2 (m, aromatic carbon atoms), 166.0 (s, carbonyl carbon atom).

2.4.2. Methyl 3,5-Dihydroxybenzoate

A solution of 10.0 g (64.9 mmol) of 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid in 200 ml of methanol containing (0.35 ml, 0.64 g, 6.49 mmol) concentrated aqueous sulfuric acid solution was stirred at solvent reflux. The progress of the reaction was monitored by periodic removal of an aliquot of the reaction mixture for analysis using infrared spectroscopy (changes in the carbonyl region of the spectrum). The reaction was completed within 10 hr. Excess methanol was removed by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure to provide oil which was dissolved in 450 ml of ethyl acetate. The resulting solution was washed, successively, with two 40 ml portions of saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution and 40 ml of saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution. The solution was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure to afford a fine white solid. This material was dried overnight at 15 torr and 50°C to provide 9.08 g (90.8% yield) of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate: IR (cm⁻¹) 3229 (s, br) phenolic hydroxyl, 3089 (m) Csp2-H, 2952 (m) Csp3-H, 1687 (s) ester C=O, 1600 (s) aromatic nucleus; ¹H NMR (δ, DMSO-d₆) 3.76 (s, 3H, methoxyl protons), 6.41 (t, 1H) and 6.79 (d, 2H) aromatic protons, 9.10 (br, s, 2H, hydroxyl protons); ¹³C (δ, DMSO-d₆) 52.4 (methoxy carbon atom), 107.5, 131.7, 158.9 (aromatic carbon atoms), 166.7 (ester carbonyl carbon atom).

Both the anilide and benzoate ester were converted to the corresponding phosphorus esters using methods previously described [42]. In general, the appropriate phenolic compound was treated with a phosphite in the presence of carbon tetrachloride (Atherton-Todd procedure). For the preparation of the diphenyl phosphate ester, diphenyl chlorophosphate was used as a reagent.

2.4.3. 3,4,5-Tri(diethylphosphato)benzanilide

Into a 500 ml three-necked, round-bottomed flask fitted with a magnetic stirring bar, a dropping funnel, and a Liebig condenser bearing a gas-inlet tube were placed 5.53 g (49.0 mmol) of diethylphosphite, 2.71 g (11.0 mmol) of 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzanilide, 5.98 ml (42.9 mmol) of triethylamine, and 300 ml of ethyl acetate. The solution was stirred near 0°C (external ice bath) as 5.37 ml (55.9 mmol) of carbon tetrachloride was added, dropwise, over a period of five minutes. The progress of the reaction was monitored by periodic removal of an aliquot of the reaction mixture for analysis using infrared spectroscopy. When the spectrum of the mixture no longer contained any phenolic absorption, the mixture was filtered to remove anilinium chloride which had formed. The filtrate was washed, successively, with 50 ml of water, 50 ml of 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid solution, 50 ml of 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, and 50 ml of saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution. The solution was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure to afford 5.86 g (93.1% yield) of the triphosphate as a light tan solid: mp 79°C (DSC); ESI-MS 654 g/mol; IR (cm⁻¹) 3302 (s) N-H, 2988 (s) Csp2-H, 2912 (s) Csp3-H, 1677 (s) amide carbonyl, 1590 (m) aromatic nucleus, 1271 (s) P=O, 1013 (s) P-O-C; ¹H NMR (, CDCl₃) 1.35 (m, 18H, methyl protons), 4.06 (m, 4H, methylene protons), 4.28 (m, 8H, methylene protons), 7.35 (m, 7H, aromatic protons), 8.63 (s, 1H, amide proton); ¹³C NMR (, CDCl₃) 15.1, 64.5, 128.4 (aromatic carbon atoms), 163.9 (carbonyl carbon atoms); ³¹P NMR (, CDCl₃) 6.88, 7.20.

2.4.4. 3,4,5-Tri(dopyloxy)benzanilide

3,4,5-Tri(dopyloxy)benzanilide was prepared in a manner similar to that described above from 5.83 g (27.1 mmol) of 9,10-dihydro-9-oxa-10-phosphaphenathrene-10-oxide (DOPO) and 1.47 g (6.0 mmol) of 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzanilide. The triester, 3,4,5-tri(dopyloxy)benzanilide (4.94 g, 93.2% yield), was obtained as a white solid: mp 187°C (DSC); ESI-MS 890 g/mol; IR (cm⁻¹) 3301 (w) N-H, 3066 (s) Csp2-H, 1670 (s) amide carbonyl, 1596 (s) aromatic nucleus, 1293 (s) P=O, 910 (s) P-O-C; ¹H NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 7.36 (m, 31H), 10.47 (s, 1H); ¹³C NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 129.8 (aromatic carbon atoms), 163.0 (carbonyl carbon atom); ³¹P NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 5.76, 6.63.

2.4.5. Methyl 3,5-Di(diethylphosphato)benzoate

IR (cm⁻¹) 3094 (w) Csp2-H, 2986 (m) Csp3-H, 1728 (s) ester C=O, 1596 (s) aromatic nucleus, 1278 (s) P=O, 1006 (s) P-O-C; ¹H NMR (δ, DMSO-d₆) 1.25 (t, , 12H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 4.17 (q, , 8H), 7.37 (m, 1H) and 7.61 (m, 2H) aromatic protons; ¹³C NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 16.3, 53.2 (ethyl carbon atoms), 117.2, 117.5, 132.8, 151.5 (aromatic carbon atoms), 164.9 (ester carbonyl carbon atom), ³¹P NMR (, DMSO-d₆) −7.47.

2.4.6. Methyl 3,5-Di(diphenylphosphato)benzoate

mp 68°C (DSC); IR (cm⁻¹) 3083 (w) Csp2-H, 2948 (w) Csp3-H, 1724 (s) ester C=O, 1588 (s) aromatic nucleus, 1300 (s) P=O, 1183 (s), 903 (s) P-O-C; ¹H NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 3.85 (s, 3H) 7.24-7.47 (m, 20H, protons of diphenylphosphato groups), 7.54 (m, 1H) and 7.69 (m, 2H) (aromatic protons of trihydroxybenzoate nucleus); ¹³C NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 53.3 (methoxy carbon atom), 117.4, 118.4, 133.4, 150.5 (aromatic carbon atoms of trihydroxybenzoate nucleus), 116-152 (additional peaks for carbon atoms of the diphenylphosphato groups), 164.5 (ester carbonyl carbon atom); ³¹P NMR (δ, DMSO-d₆) −17.6.

2.4.7. Methyl 3,5-Di(dopyloxy)benzoate

mp 145°C (DSC); IR (cm⁻¹) 3061 (w) Csp2-H, 2953 (w) Csp3-H, 1731 (δ) ester C=O, 1594 (s) aromatic nucleus, 1308 (s) P=O, 1195 (s) and 929 (s) P-O-C; ¹H NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 3.81 (s, 3H), 6.90-8.41(m, 20H); ¹³C NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 53.2 (methoxy carbon atom), 116.2-151.1 (aromatic carbon atoms), 164.5 (ester carbonyl carbon atom); ³¹P NMR (, DMSO-d₆) 6.50.

3. Results and Discussion

Gallic acid and other multihydroxybenzoic acids are found widely in nature and represent annually renewable platforms for the generation of phosphorus flame retardants. The multiple hydroxyl groups provide ready sites for the incorporation of relatively high levels of phosphorus. The hydroxyls may be converted to a range of phosphorus esters using the well-known Atherton-Todd procedure [43]. This is illustrated in Scheme 1 for gallic acid. The acid is first converted to the corresponding anilide, and then the hydroxyls are utilized to generate both the tris-DOPO phosphonate and the tris-(diethylphosphate). Both are solids melting at 187°C and 79°C, respectively. The ³¹P NMR spectra of both compounds contain two resonances reflecting two different environments for the phosphorus moieties. The spectrum for the tris-(diethylphosphate) contains peaks at and −7.20 for the esters at C-4 and at C-3 and C-5, respectively. The corresponding peaks for the DOPO phosphonate appear at and 7.06. Both compounds are thermally stable to relatively high temperatures. The degradation onset temperature for the tris-(diethylphosphate) (GA-DEP) is 239°C, and that for the DOPO phosphonate (GA-DOPO) is 316° C. The complete decomposition characteristics are listed in Table 1.

Scheme 1: Synthesis of phosphorus esters of gallic acid.

Table 1: Thermal decomposition of phosphorous esters of gallic acid anilide.

Compound
Temperature of decomposition onset (°C)a
Temperature of maximum decomposition rate (°C)
Decomposition residue (%)b

Nitrogen
Air
Nitrogen
Air
Nitrogen
Air

GA-DEP
239
175
253
205
37
13

GA-DOPO
316
313
373
366
18
7

aExtrapolated onset temperature from the derivative plot of mass loss versus temperature. bPercentage of the initial sample mass.

For the assessment of flame-retarding impact, the esters were incorporated into DGEBA resin at levels sufficient to provide one and two percent phosphorus (7–19% additive). The thermal stability of the blends is reflected in Figure 1. It can be seen that the presence of the phosphorus esters does not significantly lower the thermal stability of the epoxy polymer. Numerical data for the degradation of the phosphorus ester/epoxy blends are collected in Table 2.

Figure 1: Thermal stability of blends of phosphorus esters of gallic acid anilide with DGEBA epoxy.

Table 2: Thermal degradation of blends of phosphorous esters of gallic acid anilide with DGEBA epoxy.

Blend
Level of additive in blend (%)
Level of phosphorous in blend (%)
Decomposition onset temperature (°C)a
Temperature of maximum decomposition rate (°C)
Decomposition residue (%)b

Nitrogen
Air
Nitrogen
Air
Nitrogen
Air

DGEBA epoxy
0
0
390
374
423
408
8
8

GA-DEP-E
7.5
1
342
349
370
371
22
4

GA-DEP-E
15.0
2
327
334
352
354
25
6

GA-DOPO-E
9.6
1
360
372
394
392
16
3

GA-DOPO-E
19.1
2
348
353
381
375
16
3

aExtrapolated onset temperature from the derivative plot of mass/loss versus temperature. bPercentage of the initial sample mass.

Glass transition temperatures for the phosphorus ester blends with epoxy are collected in Table 3. As may be seen, the glass transition temperature for the resin is altered only slightly by the presence of the esters.

Table 3: Glass transition temperatures for blends of phosphorus esters of gallic acid anilide with DGEBA epoxy resin.

Blend
Phosphorous level (%)
Additive by weight (%)
(°C)

DGEBA epoxy
0
0
110

GA-DEP-E
1
7.5
129

2
14.0
148

GA-DOPO-E
1
9.6
145

2
19.1
142

The flammability of the blends was assessed using limiting oxygen index (LOI) measurements, UL 94 vertical burn test, and microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC). Plots for the peak heat release rates for blends of 3,4,5-tri(diethylphosphato)benzanilide in epoxy are displayed in Figure 2, and those for the analogous DOPO ester blends in Figure 3. In both cases, a significant peak heat release rate reduction for the combustion of epoxy is achieved by incorporation of either of the phosphorus esters at a level sufficient to provide one or two percent phosphorus. This is particularly true for the incorporation of 3,4,5-tri(diethylphosphato)benzanilide.

Figure 2: Peak heat release rates for blends of 3,4,5-tri(diethylphosphato)benzanilide with DGEBA epoxy resin.

Figure 3: Peak heat release rates for blends of 3,4,5-tri(dopyloxy)benzanilide with DGEBA epoxy resin.

All the flammability data are collected in Table 4. Most notably, incorporation of two percent 3,4,5-tri(dopyloxy)benzanilide into DGEBA epoxy afforded a material with a 22% peak heat release rate reduction, an LOI value of 27, and a UL 94 rating of V0.

Table 4: Flammability characteristics of blends of phosphorous esters of gallic acid anilide with DGEBA epoxy resin.

Additive
Additive level (%)
Phosphorous level (%)
Peak heat release rate (W/g)
Limiting oxygen index (%)
UL 94 rating

DGEBA epoxy
0
0
692
19.0
NR

GA-DEP-E
7.5
1
491
22.5
NR

GA-DEP-E
14.0
2
411
23.0
NR

GA-DOPO-E
9.6
1
617
23.8
V2

GA-DOPO-E
19.1
2
541
27.0
V0

The preparation of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydorxybenzoate is illustrated in Scheme 2. The progress of the reaction may conveniently be monitored using infrared spectroscopy. The band for hydroxyl absorption (3229 cm⁻¹) in the spectrum of the starting material gradually disappears. The spectra for the phosphorus esters contain prominent absorptions for ester carbonyl (1728, 1724, and 1731 cm⁻¹), aromatic nuclei (1596, 1588, and 1594 cm⁻¹), P=O (1278, 1300, and 1308 cm⁻¹), and P-O-C (1006, 1183, 903, 1185, and 929 cm⁻¹). The proton NMR spectra for the phosphorus esters may be found in Figure 4. All contain distinct absorptions for the aromatic nucleus of the starting material as well as those expected for the ester moieties.

Scheme 2: Synthesis of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate.

Figure 4: ¹H NMR spectra of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate. All the esters display good thermal stability (Table 5). Two esters, the diphenyl phosphate and the DOPO phosphonate, display decomposition onset temperatures above 300°C.

Table 5: Thermal decomposition of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate.

Compound
Temperature of decomposition onset (°C)a
Temperature of maximum decomposition rate (°C)
Decomposition residue (%)b

Nitrogen
Air
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
Air

35DHB-DEP
224
224
272
5
<1

35DHB-DPP
328
303
366
<1
5

35DHB-DOPO
332
319
393
22
<1

aExtrapolated onset temperature from the derivative plot of mass loss versus temperature. bPercentage of the initial sample mass.

For the assessment of the impact of these esters on flammability, blends of these esters at a level to provide one or two percent phosphorus with DGEBA epoxy were prepared. As may be seen from the data presented in Table 6, the incorporation of the esters at these levels does not appreciably alter the glass transition temperature for the polymer. The thermal stability for the blends is reflected in Table 7. The thermal stability of the resin is not much impacted by low loadings of the esters.

Table 6: Glass transition temperatures for blends of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate with DGEBA epoxy resin.

Additive
Additive level (wt%)
Phosphorus level (wt%)
(°C)

None
0
0
109

35DHB-DEP
7.1
1
126

35DHB-DEP
14.2
2
137

35DHB-DPP
10.2
1
119

35DHB-DPP
20.4
2
116

35DHB-DOPO
9.6
1
128

35DHB-DOPO
19.2
2
142

Table 7: Thermal degradation characteristics for blends of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate in DGEBA epoxy resin.

Additive
Additive level (wt%)
Phosphorus level (wt%)
(°C)a
(°C)b
Charc (wt%)

None
0
0
390
423
10

35DHB-DEP
7.1
1
345
373
23

35DHB-DEP
14.2
2
329
355
26

35DHB-DPP
10.2
1
349
375
24

35DHB-DPP
20.4
2
328
356
27

35DHB-DOPO
9.6
1
369
394
15

35DHB-DOPO
19.2
2
354
379
18

aExtrapolated onset temperature from the derivative plot of mass loss versus temperature. bPercentage of the initial sample mass. cNitrogen atmosphere.

The peak heat release rates for blends of the esters with DGEBA epoxy are shown in Figures 5-7. The reduction in peak heat release is most notable for the bis-diethylphosphato ester. For this compound, a loading sufficient to provide 2% phosphorus induces a 50% reduction in the peak heat release rate.

Figure 5: Peak heat release rates for blends of methyl 3,5-di(diethylphosphato)benzoate in DGEBA epoxy.

Figure 6: Peak heat release rates for blends of methyl 3,5-di(diphenylphosphato)benzoate in DGEBA epoxy.

Figure 7: Peak heat release rates for blends of methyl 3,5-di(dopyloxy)benzoate in DGEBA epoxy.

Flammability data for all the blends are collected in Table 8. The most effective compound is the di(dopyloxy) ester. At a loading sufficient to provide 2% phosphorus, combustion of the blend reflects a reduction in the peak heat release rate (678 W/g to 519 W/g), an LOI of 33, and a UL 94 rating of V2.

Table 8: Flammability characteristics for blends of phosphorus esters of methyl 3,5-dihydroxybenzoate with DGEBA epoxy.

Compound
% phosphorus
PHRR (W/g)
THR (kJ/g)
LOI (% O₂)
UL 94 rating
% additive

Epoxy
0%
677.7
29.8
19
NR
0

35DHB-DEP
1%
470.9
25.7
23.6
NR
7.1

2%
348.7
18.9
23.4
NR
14.2

35DHB-DPP
1%
505.4
23.3
24.6
NR
10.2

2%
330.1
20.1
24.6
NR
20.4

35DHB-DOPO
1%
620.3
22.5
30.8
NR
9.6

2%
518.8
22.6
33.3
V2
19.2

For both series of phosphorus esters, their incorporation into DGEBA epoxy resin at levels sufficient to provide one or two percent phosphorus does not significantly impact the properties or thermal stability of the polymer but does impart significant flame retardancy. The DOPO phosphonate is the most effective. This is clear from both LOI and UL 94 measurements. The phosphates promote char formation and strongly lower the peak release rate for the combustion of the polymer. The peak heat release rate reduction for the polymer containing the DOPO phosphonate is much smaller than that for the polymer containing the corresponding phosphates. This is probably reflective of the different modes of action. DOPO derivatives are generally thought to act predominately by liberating species to the gas phase which inhibits flame-propagating reactions [44, 45]. The results from MCC may underestimate the effectiveness of flame retardants that function in the gas phase [46–48]. The action of a phosphorus ester additive is dependent on the level of oxygenation at phosphorus [49–52]. In general, increasing gas phase activity is observed for a decreasing level of oxygenation at phosphorus [48–51]. Compounds with a high level of oxygenation at phosphorus tend to promote char formation in the solid phase. These observations are consistent with those presented here. It would appear that the phosphates function largely in the solid phase while the phosphonates display predominately gas phase activity.

4. Conclusions

Gallic acid and other multihydroxybenzoic acids are found widely in nature and represent a renewable biosource for the generation of effective phosphorus flame retardants. Gallic acid and 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid have been converted to a series of phosphorus esters that display good flame retardancy in DGEBA epoxy resin. Phosphonates have a greater inhibitory effect on the flammability of the resin than do the corresponding phosphates and probably function predominately in the gas phase.

Data Availability

Structural and flammability data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted at Central Michigan University. Diphenyl chlorophosphate was provided by ICL-IP America. Epoxy (DGEBA) was supplied by the Dow Chemical Company.

References

M. A. Hillmyer, “The promise of plastics from plants,” Science, vol. 358, no. 6365, pp. 868–870, 2017.

D. K. Schneiderman and M. A. Hillmyer, “50th anniversary perspective: there is a great future in sustainable polymers,” Macromolecules, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 3733–3749, 2017.

R. Mulhaupt, “Green polymer chemistry and biobased plastics: dreams and reality,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 159–174, 2013.

M. M. Reddy, S. Vivekanandhan, M. Misra, S. K. Bhatia, and A. K. Mohanty, “Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: current status and future opportunities,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 38, no. 10-11, pp. 1653–1689, 2013.

M. Malinconico, P. Cerruti, G. Santagata, and B. Immirzi, “Natural polymers and additives in commodity and specialty applications: a challenge for the chemistry of future,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 124–133, 2014.

J. Kuczynski and D. J. Boday, “Biobased materials for high-end electronics applications,” International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 557–563, 2012.

T. Zhang, B. A. Howell, A. Dumitrascu, S. J. Martin, and P. B. Smith, “Synthesis and characterization of glycerol-adipic acid hyperbranched polyesters,” Polymer, vol. 55, no. 20, pp. 5065–5072, 2014.

T. Zhang, B. A. Howell, and P. B. Smith, “Rational synthesis of hyperbranched polyesters,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1661–1670, 2017.

P. F. H. Harmsen, M. M. Hackmann, and H. L. Bos, “Green building blocks for biobased plastics,” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 306–324, 2014.

A. Pellis, E. Herrero Acero, L. Gardossi, V. Ferrario, and G. M. Guebitz, “Renewable building blocks for sustainable polyesters: new biotechnological routes for greener plastics,” Polymer International, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 861–871, 2016.

T. J. Farmer, J. W. Comerford, A. Pellis, and T. Robert, “Post-polymerization modification of biobased polymers: maximizing the high functionality of polymers derived from biomass,” Polymer International, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 775–789, 2018.

B. A. Howell, Developing Alternative Plasticizers to Overcome Issues of Migration, Toxicity and Flammability, AMI PVC Formulation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2018.

Z. Yu, J. Zhou, J. Zhang, K. Huang, F. Cao, and P. Wei, “Evaluating effects of biobased 2,5-furandicarboxylate esters as plasticizers on the thermal and mechanical properties of poly(vinyl chloride),” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 131, no. 20, article 40938, 2014.

X. Li, X. Nie, J. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Preparation of epoxidized cardanol butyl ether as a novel renewable plasticizer and its application for poly(vinyl chloride),” Polymer International, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 443–449, 2017.

B. A. Howell, K. E. Carter, and H. Dangalle, “Flame retardants based on tartaric acid: a renewable by-product of the wine industry,” in Renewable and Sustainable Polymers, (ACS Symposium Series 1063), Chapter 9, G. F. Payne and P. B. Smith, Eds., pp. 133–152, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., USA, 2011.

B. A. Howell and Y. G. Daniel, “Phosphorus flame retardants from esters of isosorbide and 10-undecanoic acid,” in Green Polymer Chemistry: Biobased Materials and Biocatalysis, Chapter 21, H. N. Cheng, R. A. Gross, and P. B. Smith, Eds., ACS Symposium Series 1192, pp. 339–367, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C, USA, 2015.

Y. G. Daniel and B. A. Howell, “Flame retardant properties of isosorbide bis-phosphorus esters,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 140, pp. 25–31, 2017.

A. Pettigrew, “Halogenated flame retardants,” Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, Volume 10, J. I. Kroschwitz and M. Howe-Grant, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 4th edition, 1993.

M. Alaee and R. J. Wenning, “The significance of brominated flame retardants in the environment: current understanding, issues and challenges,” Chemosphere, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 579–582, 2002.

P. O. Darnerud, “Brominated flame retardants as possible endocrine disrupters,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 152–160, 2008.

J. B. Herbstman, A. Sjödin, M. Kurzon et al., “Prenatal exposure to PBDEs and neurodevelopment,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 712–719, 2010.

S. Shaw, “Halogenated flame retardants: do the fire safety benefits justify the risks?” Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 261–305, 2010.

S. Narayan and M. Moore, “Flame retardants – a new, versatile flame retardant for olefinic and styrenic polymers,” Popular Plastics and Packaging, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 58–60, 2012.

S. Levchik, E. Eden, Y. Hirschsohn, M. Leifer, and A. Ben-Zvi, Antimony Trioxide Free Solutions for Engineering Thermoplastics, AMI Fire Retardants in Plastics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2018.

G. Hess, “Industry drops flame retardant,” Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 88, no. 1, p. 10, 2010.

C. Hogue, “U.S. chemical regulation shifts,” Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 94, no. 27, pp. 18–20, 2016.

C. Hogue, “Two U.S. states ban flame retardants in furniture,” Chemical and Engineering News, vol. 95, no. 41, p. 19, 2017.

M. M. Velencoso, A. Battig, J. C. Markwart, B. Schartel, and F. R. Wurm, “Molecular firefighting-how modern phosphorus chemistry can help solve the challenge of flame retardancy,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 57, no. 33, pp. 10450–10467, 2018.

I. van der Veen and J. de Boer, “Phosphorus flame retardants: properties, production, environmental occurrence, toxicity and analysis,” Chemosphere, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1119–1153, 2012.

C. Hirsch, B. Striegl, S. Mathes et al., “Multiparameter toxicity assessment of novel DOPO-derived organophosphorus flame retardants,” Archives of Toxicology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 407–425, 2017.

M. Vazirian, M. Khanavi, Y. Amarzadeh, and H. Hajimehdipoor, “Quantification of gallic acid in fruits of three medicinal plants,” Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 2, pp. 233–236, 2011.

D. C. Vu, P. H. Vo, M. V. Coggeshall, and C.-H. Lin, “Identification and characterization of phenolic compounds in black walnut kernels,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 17, pp. 4503–4511, 2018.

T.-R. Su, J.-J. Lin, C.-C. Tsai et al., “Inhibition of melanogenesis by gallic acid: possible involvement of the PI3K/Akt, MEK/ERK and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in B16F10 cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 20443–20458, 2013.

S.-H. Kim, C.-D. Jun, K. Suk et al., “Gallic acid inhibits histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in mast cells,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 123–131, 2006.

J. Ma, X.-D. Luo, P. Protiva et al., “Bioactive novel polyphenols from the fruit of Manilkara zapota (sapodilla),” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 983–986, 2003.

C. Yang, X. Xie, H. Tang, X. Dong, X. Zhang, and F. Huang, “Transcriptome analysis reveals GA induced apoptosis in HCT 116 human colon cancer cells through calcium and p53 signal pathways,” RSC Advances, vol. 8, no. 22, pp. 12449–12458, 2018.

J. A. Bahry and B. A. Howell, “Gallic acrylates as a base for the development of nontoxic flame retardants,” in 47th Central Regional Meeting of the American Chemical Society, p. 208, Covington, KY, USA, May, 2016.

K. Dziedzic, D. Górecka, A. Szwengiel et al., “The content of dietary fibre and polyphenols in morphological parts of buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum),” Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2018.

M. Holasova, V. Fiedlerova, H. Smrcinova, M. Orsak, J. Lachman, and S. Vavreinova, “Buckwheat-the source of antioxidant activity in functional foods,” Food Research International, vol. 35, no. 2-3, pp. 207–211, 2002.

P. V. Hung and N. Morita, “Distribution of phenolic compounds in the graded flours milled from whole buckwheat grains and their antioxidant capacities,” Food Chemistry, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 325–331, 2008.

A. Ahmed, N. Khalid, A. Ahmad, N. A. Abbasi, M. S. Z. Latif, and M. A. Randhawa, “Phytochemicals and biofunctional properties of buckwheat: a review,” The Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 152, no. 03, pp. 349–369, 2014.

Y. G. Daniel and B. A. Howell, “Phosphorus flame retardants from isosorbide bis-acrylate,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 156, pp. 14–21, 2018.

Y. G. Daniel and B. A. Howell, “Synthesis and characterization of isosorbide bis-phosphorus esters,” Heteroatom Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 3, article e21369, 2017.

A. Schafer, S. Seibold, W. Lohstroh, O. Walter, and M. Doring, “Synthesis and properties of flame-retardant epoxy resins based on DOPO and one of its analog DPPO,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 685–696, 2007.

S. Liang, P. Hemberger, N. M. Neisius et al., “Elucidating the thermal decomposition of dimethyl methylphosphonate by vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photoionization: pathways to the PO radical, a key species in flame-retardant mechanisms,” Chemistry - A European Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1073–1080, 2015.

R. N. Walters, N. Safronava, and R. E. Lyon, “A microscale combustion calorimeter study of gas phase combustion of polymers,” Combustion and Flame, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 855–863, 2015.

H. Guo, R. E. Lyon, N. Safronava, R. N. Walters, and S. Crowley, “A simplified model on carbon monoxide yield in burning of polymeric solids containing flame retardants,” Fuel, vol. 222, pp. 175–179, 2018.

F. Raffan-Montoya, S. I. Stoliarov, S. Levchik, and E. Eden, “Screening flame retardants using milligram-scale flame calorimetry,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 151, pp. 12–24, 2018.

B. Schartel, B. Perret, B. Dittrich et al., “Flame retardancy of polymers: the role of specific reactions in the condensed phase,” Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 9–35, 2016.

U. Braun, A. I. Balabanovich, B. Schartel et al., “Influence of the oxidation state of phosphorus on the decomposition and fire behaviour of flame-retarded epoxy resin composites,” Polymer, vol. 47, no. 26, pp. 8495–8508, 2006.

R. Sonnier, C. Negrell-Guirao, H. Vahabi, B. Otazaghine, G. David, and J.-M. Lopez-Cuesta, “Relationships between the molecular structure and the flammability of polymers: study of phosphonate functions using microscale combustion calorimeter,” Polymer, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1258–1266, 2012.

A. Lorenzetti, M. Modesti, S. Besco, D. Hrelja, and S. Donadi, “Influence of phosphorus valency on thermal behaviour of flame retarded polyurethane foams,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 1455–1461, 2011.