International Journal of Zoology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 782641, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/782641

Research Article

The Female Reproductive Cycle of the Bedriaga Plate-Tailed Gecko, Teratoscincus bedriagai (Sauria: Gekkonidae) in Iran

Fatemeh Mojibi and Vida Hojati

Department of Biology, College of Biological Sciences, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan 3671639998, Iran

Received 10 September 2014; Revised 27 October 2014; Accepted 28 October 2014; Published 16 November 2014

Academic Editor: Eugene S. Morton

Copyright © 2014 Fatemeh Mojibi and Vida Hojati. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The Bedriaga Plate-tailed Gecko, Teratoscincus bedriagai Nikolsky, 1900, is distributed in the northern and eastern desert basins of the Central Plateau of Iran, Sistan, and the desert regions of southern Afghanistan. Iranian specimens are believed to be rare in collections. In this study, the reproductive cycle of this species has been investigated through focusing on oogenesis from 5 April to 5 August, 2013. Generally, 15 adult females were collected by hand at midnight from southern parts of Damghan County, situated in Semnan Province of Iran. Ovaries were removed and processed for the purpose of histological and morphometric studies. The results revealed that oocyte growth starts in early April and terminates in late July. Moreover, mating commences in spring, especially at the beginning of May, with oviposition occurring from late May to late July. Approximately, 1 to 2 eggs are laid by females per clutch with the possibility of producing a secondary clutch later in the season. The maximum reproductive activity takes place in May and continues with a decreasing trend in June and more reduction in July and finally ends in August. No significant difference was observed between right and left side of reproductive system. Therefore, oogenesis occurs from April to July, while T. bedriagai follows an oogenic cycle typical for temperate species.

1. Introduction

Lizards show three general types of reproductive cycles: constant, associated, and dissociated [1]. A constant reproductive cycle is exhibited by tropical lizards in which gonads are active almost year-round [2]. Associated and dissociated reproductive cycles are characterized by the presence of a discontinuous mating season. In associated type, gonadal activity increases immediately prior to the mating period in both males and females simultaneously and females have no need to store sperm due to its availability during the reproductive season. This cycle is common in species that live in predictable environments such as in the temperate zones [3], the subtropics [4], and the seasonal tropics [5]. In the dissociated type, gonadal activity is low during the mating period and peaks during the nonmating period and male gonadal activity is shorter than that of females and sperm is stored by the female genital system for some months with fertilization occurring later [6]. A dissociated cycle is typically observed in species that live in temperate zones and have a brief mating season [7].

The Gekkota are an infraorder of reptiles, comprising all geckos and the limbless Pygopodidae. Gekkota are a suborder of Squamata and consist of seven families: [8–12] Gekkonidae, Carphodactylidae, Diplodactylidae, Eublepharidae, Phyllodactylidae, Pygopodidae, and Sphaerodactylidae [8, 10, 11].

The Plate-tailed Gecko or Skink Gecko, Teratoscincus bedriagai Nikolsky, 1900, belongs to the family Gekkonidae. In fact, Teratoscincus has long been a genus that was distinctive in morphological studies [13], and recent molecular work has placed it with the expanded family Sphaerodactylidae rather than the Gekkonidae [8, 10]. T. bedriagai is a nocturnal, insectivorous, and oviparous lizard distributed in the northern and eastern desert basins of the Central Plateau of Iran, Sistan, and the desert regions of southern Afghanistan as far east as Kandahar. Iranian specimens are rare in collections. This species in Iran is distributed in Sistan and Balutchestan, Khorasan, Semnan, Tehran and Yazd Provinces [14]. Since the time when Zarudny collected the types in 1898, the species was not found again until the 1962-63 Street Expedition, when a single specimen was collected near Zabol and Ranck along with the mammal survey of the National Museum of Natural History (Washington), when two specimens were collected by Hermann from the Sistan area in 1962 [15]. Furthermore, 10 specimens were collected by Tuck and Anderson from the Sistan area in 1975 [14]. A description of this species was presented by Anderson [14] which was based on five specimens. Further morphological data in accordance with 50 specimens collected in the Semnan Province of Iran was given by Hojati [16]. Since no data is available on the reproduction of this species, this research has been conducted to characterize the female reproductive cycle of this species in Iran.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

All specimens were collected from Hassan Abad, Saleh Abad, Alian and Yazdan Abad villages located in south of Damghan County, Semnan Province of Iran (54°19′E, 35°55′N). Damghan is located at 1170 m above sea level and north of the Central Kavir Desert (Figure 1). The annual average temperature is 17.2°C. The study area consists of alkaline saline soils comprising clay and sand. The dominant plant species are Tamarix sp., Salsola sp., Alhaji sp., Peganum sp., Atriplex sp., and Astragalus sp.

Figure 1: Map showing the sampling site (Damghan County) in northern Iran.

2.2. Sampling

Since there is an ethic to collect rare reptiles for science in the country, we used the permission of scientific collection from the Department of Environment of Damghan County to collect three adult specimens in each month.

Sampling was conducted periodically every month during the activity period of this species from 5 April to 5 August, 2013. All specimen collections were by hand incorporating a torch at night time (Figure 2). Generally, 15 adult and mature females were captured (three specimens per sampling period). Our observations revealed that females reached sexual maturity at a body length (SVL) of about 55 mm, while we tried to capture specimens which had attained larger SVL to ensure that they were sexually mature adults. Some specimens were kept in terrarium for the purpose of studying the frequency of clutch deposition.

Figure 2: Teratoscincus bedriagai in Hassan Abad, Iran.

2.3. Methods

The specimens were transferred alive to the Zoology Laboratory of Islamic Azad University, Damghan Branch, and measurements of W (weight), SVL (south-vent length), TL (tail length), and HL (head length) were conducted accordingly. Then, they were anaesthetized by chloroform and anatomized. Next, the ROD (right ovary diameter), LOD (left ovary diameter), ROW (right ovary weight), LOW (left ovary weight), RFN (right follicles numbers), LFN (left follicles numbers), MaxRFD (right follicles maximum diameter), MaxLFD (left follicles maximum diameter), MinRFD (right follicles minimum diameter), MinLFD (left follicles minimum diameter), MRFD (right follicles mean diameter), MLFD (left follicles mean diameter), OEL (oviductal egg length), OEWi (oviductal egg width), OEW (oviductal egg weight), and FLD (follicular layer diameter) were measured. Length, width, and diameter were measured through a dial caliper having an accuracy of 0.02 mm. Weight was measured by a scale with an accuracy of 0.001 g. By the time Gonads were removed, they were inspected for metric and meristic characters. The number, weight, diameter (length and width), and volume of immature, growing, and mature follicles and oviductal eggs were investigated in right and left ovaries, separately. After fixing the ovaries in 10% formalin, tissues were dehydrated, cleared in Xylene, infiltrated, and embedded with paraffin. After that, sections were made at 5 to 7 microns, deparaffinized, rehydrated, stained (Hematoxylin and Eosin), and mounted. Last, the sections were studied using a light microscopy at 100x and 400x magnification and also photographs were prepared by a digital camera. Finally, data was analyzed hiring the SPSS 18 software, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s test to compare biometric data among monthly samples ().

3. Results

In this study, the maximum SVL, TL, HL, and HW of samples were 68.62, 37.14, 17.14, and 15.89 mm, respectively. Also, the body length of the smallest mature female was 55 mm.

T. bedriagai speciesin the study area hibernates from early October to late March and early April. Generally, the specimens emerge in early April and begin oogenesis, whereas mating is observed in early May. The ovaries are paired and vesicular and consist of 3 to 8 follicles. Three types of follicles were observed: immature, growing, and mature. The growing follicles were observed in April. There was an immediate increase in ovary size in May and mature follicles were examined from early May to the mid of June. The mean diameter of ovary in April, May, and June was 2.32, 5.09, and 4.11 mm, respectively.

The follicular layer is multilayered and polymorphic (Figure 3). The mean diameter of follicular layer is 54.05 μm. Moreover, the diameter of the nucleus fluctuates from 27.83 to 45.50 μm in immature and growing follicles. The nucleoli are distinguishable from April to June and their numbers vary from 3 to 15 in immature and growing follicles, respectively. There seems to be an increase in the activity of nucleoli after June and, then, they disappear in the nucleus. Finally, mature oocytes enter the oviducts, where fertilization occurs.

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: The growing follicle (a) and follicular layer (b) of Teratoscincus bedriagai on 5 June.

Also, oviductal eggs were observed between 5 May and 5 July (Figure 4). The weight, length, and width of the largest oviductal egg were 0.96 g, 14.50 mm, and 9.20 mm, respectively. Based on our observations, oviposition might take place twice a year. Oviposition occurs from late May to late July and the number of laid eggs varied from 1 to 2 per clutch. In the terrarium, the first two eggs were laid on 23 May (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Teratoscincus bedriagai on 5 May.

White color and an oval shape are the two main features of eggs that were deposited from late May to late July. The egg shells are initially soft, but then they harden after 8–12 hours after deposition.

The weight, SVL, HL, and TL of the smallest hatchling obtained on 5 August were 2.29 g, 36.73 mm, 10.84 mm, and 19.96 mm, respectively. The juveniles were commonly investigated from July to September.

The descriptive statistics of macroscopic and microscopic characters are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Analysis of variance of characters indicates that some characters including mean diameter of left and right ovaries and maximum, minimum, and mean diameter of follicles and follicular layer were significantly different among groups (). The maximum activity of oogenesis takes place in May (Figures 5 and 6).

Table 1: Descriptive statistics of macroscopic characters in T. bedriagai (for abbreviations, see Materials and Methods section).

Characters

Range
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. deviation
Variance

Statistic
Std. error

W (g)
15
5.02
5.99
11.01
7.89
0.445
1.72
2.97

SVL (mm)
15
13.62
55.00
68.62
63.24
1.053
4.08
16.64

TL (mm)
15
14.39
22.75
37.14
31.21
0.94
3.63
13.18

HL (mm)
15
2.78
14.36
17.14
15.53
0.22
0.85
0.72

HW (mm)
15
4.80
11.09
15.89
13.46
0.372
1.44
2.08

ROD (mm)
15
3.20
2.10
5.30
3.85
0.27
1.06
1.13

LOD (mm)
15
3.49
2.10
5.59
3.97
0.26
0.99
0.99

ROW (g)
15
1.19
0.006
1.20
0.32
0.098
0.38
0.14

LOW (g)
15
1.44
0.006
1.45
0.36
0.11
0.42
0.18

OEN
3
0.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

OEL (mm)
3
8.08
6.42
14.50
9.67
2.46
4.27
18.19

OEWi (mm)
3
3.02
6.18
9.20
7.19
1.003
1.74
3.02

OEW (g)
3
0.18
0.78
0.96
0.84
0.04
0.07
0.005

Table 2: Descriptive statistics of microscopic characters in T. bedriagai.

Characters

Range
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. deviation
Variance

Statistic
Std. error

RFN
15
4.00
4.00
8.00
5.67
0.37
1.45
2.09

LFN
15
5.00
3.00
8.00
5.87
0.39
1.51
2.27

(mm)
15
0.80
1.70
2.50
2.09
0.07
0.28
0.08

(mm)
15
0.93
1.75
2.68
2.23
0.08
0.30
0.09

(mm)
15
0.99
0.85
1.84
1.32
0.08
0.32
0.10

(mm)
15
1.30
0.74
2.04
1.35
0.10
0.38
0.14

MRFD (mm)
15
1.80
1.54
3.34
2.32
0.14
0.56
0.31

MLFD (mm)
15
2.76
1.20
3.96
2.36
0.20
0.79
0.62

FLD (µm)
15
29.90
40.60
70.50
54.05
2.68
10.38
107.79

Figure 5: The mean ovary weight of Teratoscincus bedriagai.

Figure 6: The mean ovary diameter of Teratoscincus bedriagai.

In addition, no significant difference is observed in the ovarian characters between the left and right side of the body (paired -test, in all cases).

4. Discussion

The significance of this study is owed to the fact that the results of this study regarding the oogenic cycle of T. bedriagai are being reported for the first time from Iran and west southern Asia. Since oogenesis occurred from April to July, the pattern followed an associated reproductive cycle typical for species from temperate areas.

Regarding the oogenic cycle of T. bedriagai, the three following phases have been reported according to the results of this investigation: (1) inactive phase: with small follicles from August to March, (2) vitellogenic phase: with growing and mature oocytes from early April to mid-May, and (3) oviductal egg phase from late May to mid-July.

There exists an increase in the weight and diameter of the ovaries and oocytes in May and the females tend to be heavier in mid- and late spring as a result of the presence of eggs. A similar clutch size was observed for this species compared to other gekkonid lizards in Iran like Tenuidactylus caspius [17] and Cyrtopodion scabrum [14]. According to the study conducted on the gecko Hemidactylus mabouia, the small cells of the granulosa layer are categorized into three separate cell types: small, intermediate, and the large pyriform cells [18]. A multilayer and polymorphic follicular layer was observed for T. bedriagai similar to other geckos such as Tenuidactylus caspius [17]. The general squamata pattern belonging to oviparous reptiles is similarly reported for the gross morphology, oogenesis, and folliculogenesis of the ovaries of T. bedriagai [18]. Almost 1 to 2 eggs per clutch are laid by this species, where the second egg is usually laid 2 to 7 days after the first one. Besides, the comparative analysis of egg shape for geckos has another advantage: invariant clutches of one or two eggs are laid by the female geckos of all species [19]. Hence, no more than one developing egg in a single ovary is owned by female geckos at a time.

Hardening of the egg shells takes place 8–12 hours after deposition and, therefore, their safety against desiccating environmental conditions and predators will be ensured compared to a soft shell. The following four gekkotan families, namely, Carphodactylidae, Diplodactylidae, Eublepharidae, and Pygopodidae, lay soft-shelled eggs, whereas their close relatives (Gekkonidae) lay hard-shelled eggs [20]. Production of this highly mineralized egg shell is not economical since calcium is a limiting element for most terrestrial organisms, but more elongated eggs are laid by small species within gekkonids compared to larger ones [21]. In this study, more than one egg clutch per year has been reported. Probably, hatching in T. bedriagai similar to other sympatric geckos, Tenuidactylus caspius, occurred after about 45 to 50 days after oviposition in July or early August.

Also, the results highlight an associated type reproductive cycle for T. bedriagai which occurs during the well-defined period in which oocytes were not found in the ovaries throughout the year. A continuous reproductive cycle overall a year with laying two eggs per clutch is observed for the geckos of tropic regions such as Dixonius siamensis [22], Gekko gecko [23], Gekko smithii [24, 25], Cyrtodactylus malayanus, and Cyrtodactylus pubisulcus [26]. Moreover, egg production in common barking gecko, Ptenopus garrulus, is limited to the right ovary in South Africa [27], while both ovaries participate in egg production in T. bedriagai species. The ovarian cycle and egg production are a function of temperature and photoperiod [28, 29]. Still, egg weight turns out to be a function of the female body weight and not her body length [30].

The pelvic limitation hypothesis predicts that lizards producing relatively larger eggs are forced to increase egg length rather than egg width. In geckos, this restriction would mean that lineages with soft-versus-hard eggshells should differ in egg length, but not in egg width relative to body size. Preliminary analysis shows that egg widths relate to SVL more or less equally in all gecko families with similar body shape.

Furthermore, the truly large distinction in scaling of egg size to SVL between gekkonids and eublepharids + diplodactylids + carphodactylids is limited to egg length. These results, thus, strongly support the pelvic limitation hypothesis on gekkonid egg shape. The relation between egg width egg length and SVL is isometric; that is, eggs grow proportionally to SVL, in eublepharids as well as in diplodactylids and carphodactylids sharing the same allometry. Therefore, we can conclude that egg length and consequently whole egg size in gekkonids reflect negative allometry; that is, the miniature gekkonids enlarge eggs by means of relative egg length increments. The oviductal eggs inside female eublepharids, carphodactylids, and diplodactylids are positioned nearly side by side. In contrast, gekkonid lizards with two eggs per clutch place their eggs one in front of the other [20]. The differences in relative egg size and egg position together with the observation that female eublepharids are anorexic several days before parturition whereas those of at least one gekkonid species (Paroedura picta) were observed feeding just several hours before laying suggest that the body cavities of eublepharids, diplodactylids, and carphodactylids before laying are more full. The abdominal volume, which increases in proportion to body size and then constrains relative clutch mass in diplodactylids, carphodactylids, and eublepharids, and the resultant egg size allometry in these groups are then isometric, a trait unique among ectotherms. On the contrary, empty space in the body cavity allows small female gekkonid lizards to enlarge eggs, but the pelvic limitation ensures that this only occurs by means of egg elongation [21].

The relationships between reproductive cycles and climate suggest that reproduction in lizards is affected by environmental variables such as temperature [31], precipitation [32], and photoperiod [33]. Phylogenetic constraints may also play a major role in shaping the reproductive characteristics of lizards [34]. If so, it may be beneficial to study the reproductive cycles of species within a single diverse and wide-ranging lineage.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Department of Environment of Semnan Province for permitting the collection of the specimens and Reza Babaei Savasari for his help with sampling.

References

F. H. Pough, R. M. Andrews, J. E. Cadle, M. L. Crump, A. H. Savitzky, and K. D. Wells, Herpetology, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2001.

T. A. Jenssen and S. C. Nunez, “Male and female reproductive cycles of the Jamaican lizard, Anolis opalinus,” Copeia, vol. 1994, no. 3, pp. 767–780, 1994.

J. A. Diaz, A. L. Alonso-Gomez, and M. J. Delgado, “Seasonal variation of gonadal development, sexual steroids, and lipid reserves in a population of the lizard Psammodromus algirus,” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 28, pp. 199–205, 1994.

W.-S. Huang, “Reproductive cycle of the oviparious lizard Japalura brevipes (Agamidae: Reptilia) in Taiwan, Republic of China,” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 1997.

E. J. Censky, “Mating strategy and reproductive success in the teiid lizard, Ameiva plei,” Behaviour, vol. 132, no. 7-8, pp. 529–557, 1995.

F. Torki, “Spermatogenesis in the agama Trapelus lessonae (Agamidae: Reptilia) in the Central Zagros Mountains, Iran,” Zoology in the Middle East, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2006.

J. H. Van Wyk, “The male reproductive cycle of the lizard, Cordylus giganteus (Sauria: Cordylidae),” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 29, pp. 522–535, 1995.

D. Han, K. Zhou, and A. M. Bauer, “Phylogenetic relationships among gekkotan lizards inferred from C-mos nuclear DNA sequences and a new classification of the Gekkota,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 353–368, 2004.

T. Gamble, A. M. Bauer, E. Greenbaum, and T. R. Jackman, “Out of the blue: a novel, trans-atlantic clade of geckos (Gekkota, Squamata),” Zoologica Scripta, vol. 37, pp. 355–3366, 2008.

T. Gamble, A. M. Bauer, E. Greenbaum, and T. R. Jackman, “Evidence for Gondwanan vicariance in an ancient clade of gecko lizards,” Journal of Biogeography, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 88–104, 2008.

T. Gamble, A. M. Bauer, G. R. Colli, et al., “Coming to America: multiple origins of new world geckos,” Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 231–244, 2011.

T. Gamble, E. Greenbaum, T. R. Jackman, A. P. Russell, and A. M. Bauer, “Repeated origin and loss of adhesive toepads in geckos,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e39429, 2012.

A. G. Kluge, “Cladistic relationships among gekkonid lizards,” Copeia, vol. 1983, pp. 465–475, 1983.

S. C. Anderson, The Lizards of Iran, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, New York, NY, USA, 1999.

R. G. Tuck, “Amphibians and reptiles from Iran in the United State National Museum Collection,” Bulletin of the Maryland Herpetological Society, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 36–48, 1971.

V. Hojati, H. G. Kami, A. Faghiri, and F. Ahmadzadeh, “A morphological study of the Bedriaga Plate-tailed Gecko, Teratoscincus bedriagai Nikolsky, 1900, in Semnan province of Iran (Reptilia : Gekkonidae),” Zoology in the Middle East, vol. 46, pp. 113–115, 2009.

V. Hojati, K. Parivar, E. Rastegar-Pouyani, and A. Shiravi, “The oogenic cycle of the Caspian bent-toed gecko, Cyrtopodion caspium (Squamata: Gekkonidae) in Iran,” Acta Herpetologica, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013.

G. K. Moodley and J. H. van Wyk, “Folliculogenesis and ovarian histology of the oviparous gecko, Hemidactylus mabouia (Sauria: Gekkonidae),” African Journal of Herpetology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 115–135, 2007.

R. Shine and A. E. Greer, “Why are clutch sizes more variable in some species than in others?” Evolution, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1696–1706, 1991.

P. Doughty, “The effects of “fixed” clutch sizes on lizard life-histories: reproduction in the Australian velvet gecko, Oedura lesueurii,” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 266–272, 1997.

L. Kratochvíl and D. Frynta, “Egg shape and size allometry in geckos (Squamata: Gekkota), lizards with contrasting eggshell structure: Why lay spherical eggs?” Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 217–222, 2006.

S. R. Goldberg, “Reproduction in the Siamese leaf-toed gecko, Dixonius siamensis (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Thailand,” The Texas Journal of Science, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 233–238, 2008.

S. McKeown, A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians in the Hawaiian Islands, Diamond Head Publishing, Los Osos, Calif, USA, 1996.

L. J. Vitt, “Reproductive tactics of sympatric gekkonid lizards with a comment on the evolutionary and ecological consequences of invariant clutch size,” Copeia, vol. 3, pp. 773–786, 1986.

S. R. Goldberg, “Reproduction in Smith's green-eyed gecko, Gekko smithii (Squamata: Gekkonidae),” The Texas Journal of Science, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 225–228, 2009.

I. Das, Amphibians and Reptiles of Brunei, Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 2007.

S. R. Goldberg, “Reproductive cycle of the common barking gecko, ptenopus garrulus (squamata: Gekkonidae) from southern Africa,” Texas Journal of Science, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 151–156, 2008.

L. J. Vitt and E. R. Pianka, Lizard Ecology: Historical and Experimental Perspectives, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1994.

W. W. Mayhew, “Photoperiodic response of female fringe-toed lizards,” Science, vol. 134, no. 3496, pp. 2104–2105, 1961.

E. Ramírez-Sandoval, A. Ramírez-Bautista, and L. J. Vitt, “Reproduction in the lizard Phyllodactylus lanei (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Pacific Coast of Mexico,” Copeia, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2006.

K. R. Marion, “Reproductive cues for gonadal development in temperate reptiles: temperature and photoperiod effects on the testicular cycle of the lizard Sceloporus undulatus,” Herpetologica, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 26–39, 1982.

L. J. Guillette Jr. and G. Casas-Andreu, “The reproductive biology of the high elevation Mexican lizard Barisia imbricata,” Herpetologica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 1987.

P. Licht, “Environmental control of annual testicular cycles in the lizard Anolis carolinensis. I. Interaction of light and temperature in the initiation of testicular recrudescence.,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 505–516, 1967.

A. E. Dunham and D. B. Miles, “Patterns of covariation in life history traits of squamate reptiles: the effects of size and phylogeny reconsidered,” American Naturalist, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 231–257, 1985.