ISRN Astronomy and AstrophysicsVolume 2011 (2011), Article ID 523617, 5 pagesdoi:10.5402/2011/523617

Research Article

An Old Universe in K-Essence Cosmology

Rong-Jia Yang,¹ Shuang Nan Zhang,² Bohai Chen,¹ and Jing-Zhao Qi¹

¹College of Physical Science and Technology, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China²Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 918-3, Beijing 100039, China

Received 21 November 2011; Accepted 27 December 2011

Academic Editor: P. Marziani

Copyright © 2011 Rong-Jia Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Models in which the Lagrangian contains only a kinetic factor and does not depend explicitly on the field itself in k-essence cosmology are considered. In the case of a constant potential, we obtain an exact analytic solution of k-essence, , under a simple hypothesis, , but without any assumption about the form of . In purely kinetic k-essence model, the acceleration can only be induced after the matter-dominated epoch; the Universe is about Gyr old now and about 3.1 Gyr old at which is consistent with the fact of quasar observation, while this observation contradicts with the prediction of ΛCDM model, and the year where a transition from deceleration to acceleration expansion is about from 18.43 Gyr to 25.2 Gyr after the beginning of the Universe. These results may offer clues to test observationally the k-essence scenario in the future.

1. Introduction

According to several different kinds of astrophysical studies including supernova (SN) Ia [1, 2], large-scale structure [3], and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) [4], the present Universe energy content seems to consist of approximately 4% baryons, 26% dark matter, and a little amount of radiation. The remaining around 70% of its energy, with a positive energy density but a negative pressure, is homogeneously distributed in the universe and is causing the accelerated expansion of the Universe. The simplest candidate of dark energy is the vacuum energy (or the cosmological constant ) [5]. This scenario is in general agreement with various data but suffers from two very difficult problems: first, why the vacuum energy is so much smaller than its expected natural value (the cosmological constant problem) [6]; second, why the matter and dark energy densities are of precisely the same order of magnitude today (the coincidence problem). Recently, it was shown that CDM model may also suffer from age problem [7].

It is thus natural to pursue alternative possibilities to explain the mystery of dark energy, such as quintessence [8], phantom [9, 10], -essence [11], tachyon [12–14], DGP [15], and spatial Ricci scalar dark energy model [16]. K-essence, a simple approach toward constructing a model for an accelerated expansion of the Universe, is to work with the idea that the unknown dark energy component is due to a minimally coupled scalar field with noncanonical kinetic energy [17]. A feature of k-essence models is that the negative pressure results from the nonlinear kinetic energy of the scalar field. Secondly, because of the dynamical attractor behavior, cosmic evolution is insensitive to initial conditions in k-essence theories. Thirdly, k-essence changes its speed of evolution in dynamic response to changes in the background EoS.

K-essence scenario has received much attention, it was originally proposed as a model for inflation [18] and then as a model for dark energy [17]. The stability of k-essence was studied in [19]. Dynamics of k-essence were discussed in [20]. Conditions for stable tracker solutions for k-essence in a general cosmological background were derived in [21]. Slow-roll conditions for thawing k-essence were obtained in [22]. The geometrical diagnostic for purely kinetic k-essence dark energy was discussed in [23]. In several cases, k-essence cannot be observationally distinguished from quintessence [24]. Models of k-essence unified dark matter were discussed in [25–27]. Theoretical and observational Constraints on k-essence dark energy models were discussed in [14, 28, 29]. A model-independent method to reconstruct the Lagrangian of the k-essence field by the parameterized Hubble parameter was studied in detail in [30]. With assumptions on the EoS of k-essence as functions of the scale factor , the forms of the Lagrangians were discussed in [31]. With some assumptions on the EoS of k-essence as functions of the kinetic energy , the evolution of purely kinetic k-essence is investigated in [32]. Ermakov invariant of k-essence and its observational probes for the early universe are discussed in [33].

In this paper, we will reconsider in k-essence cosmology the simplest k-essence models put forward by Scherrer [25] in which the Lagrangian contains only a kinetic factor and does not depend explicitly on the field itself. Sticking with a constant k-field potential, we obtain a general equation of state of k-essence under a simple hypothesis. This equation of state indicates that the acceleration expansion of the Universe can only be induced after the matter-dominated epoch in a very old Universe of about Gyr old, and the year where a transition from deceleration to acceleration expansion is about from 18.4 Gyr to 25.2 Gyr after the beginning of the Universe.

2. K-Essence Cosmology

As a candidate of dark energy, k-essence is defined as a scalar field with nonlinear kinetic terms which appears generically in the effective action in string and supergravity theories; its action minimally coupled with gravity generically may be expressed as [17, 18, 34, 35]

where , and we take throughout this paper. The Lagrangian depends on the specific-particle theory model. In this paper, we consider only factorial Lagrangian of the form

and is a function of the kinetic energy . The name of the model suggests that the field should be driven only by its kinetic energy. For this to be strictly true, one should impose . Using the perfect fluid analogy, the energy density is given by

where . The corresponding equation of state parameter, , is just

The effective sound speed is given by

with . This definition comes from the equation describing the evolution of linear perturbations in a k-essence dominated Universe [34], and therefore is relevant when studying the stability of the theory.

From the conservation equation in a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) spacetime, one finds the equation for the k-field [35]:

If at some , the sound speed must diverge, then the equation is singular and reduces to first-order equation which gives a constraint on the potential which must have the form: [36]. As discussed in [37], this case may violates the causality.

In (2), a variety of functional forms for and have been investigated [11, 35]. Note that the sound speed, , and the state parameter, , do not depend explicitly on in any case. Without losing generality, we take the to be a constant which was extensively discussed in [14, 25, 28–32, 36]; in other words, we consider a purely kinetic model in which

From (6), we get a new equation for :

In [36] (see also [25, 29]), a theoretical constraint on purely kinetic k-essence was obtained

where is a constant of integration. This Equation can be rewritten as [29]

where is a constant of integration.

Like in [25], we take k-essence as unified dark matter. Then in a flat homogeneous FRW space-time, one of Einstein field equations can be written as

Inserting (9) or (10) into (11), we can have

where is a constant. This is an exact analytic solution for generic forms of . Assuming [38] and (during one certain epoch (see dust dominated era), and can be seen as a constant), we obtain

here , is the present value of the scale factor, and is a constant. Comparing (13) with (12), we get . From (9), we can have

where is a constant. For or , the right side of (14) is zero, meaning that is a constant which is just zero (because ); these cases are not considered anymore in the rest of this paper. Integrating (14), we get the equation of state, :

where is a constant. Inserting (15) into (3), (4), (5), we get, respectively,

Consequently, we obtain a set of equations of purely kinetic k-essence without any assumption for the form of . To keep at any time, we must require that if , then , or, if , then . As explained above, we also require that . An interesting feature of our result is that the sound speed, , and the state parameter, , are exactly equal, whose values only depend on the parameter . For any value of , one may always have , which means that purely kinetic k-essence does not violate the strong energy condition.

Obviously, for , the energy density runs to zero, but the pressure does not, so the equation of state and the sound speed diverge. This case can be considered as an unphysical state and does not violate causality [39]. The way to stop running into these divergences is if relativistic dynamics intervenes to stop the field from running to [40].

For (), one can have and , which are the characteristics of the matter-dominated epoch. In this case-purely kinetic k-essence evolves asymptotically like a dark matter component. Another interesting result in this case is that the sound speed is near zero (). This property can suppress the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect at large angular scales [41].

When , k-essence is characterized by negative pressure which means that Cosmic acceleration can only be induced after the matter-dominated epoch in our model. This transition of k-essence from positive to negative pressure is automatically triggered by dynamics.

Figure 1 shows the evolution of the equation of state parameter of k-essence as a function of redshift in purely kinetic k-essence cosmology and the evolution of the equation of state parameter of standard CDM cosmology as a function of redshift . Taking the present (zero redshift) value of the equation of state parameter of dark energy without a priori assumption of a flat Universe, [42], and the normalized density for matter [43], we obtain for purely kinetic k-essence cosmology, while for standard CDM cosmology; this difference can be tested to distinguish purely kinetic k-essence cosmology from standard CDM cosmology. In this case, one may find ; this makes a definite prediction to the local expansion rate of our Universe and thus may be tested observationally. Any model which agrees with the SN Ia observations and has entered an accelerating phase in the recent epoch will have this feature [38]. Taking   [44], one can easily obtain the age of the Universe which is about Gyr in purely kinetic k-essence cosmology; this result does not conflict with the stellar age bound:  11-12 Gyr.

Figure 1: The evolution of the equation of state as a function of redshift in purely kinetic k-essence cosmology and the evolution of the equation of state of standard CDM cosmology as a function of redshift . Labels “a” and “b” mark the range of redshifts of transition from deceleration to acceleration of the expansion of the Universe.

As the equation of state of k-essence takes the value of , the Universe is just under a transition from deceleration to acceleration of expansion, which is constrained at redshift [45] or [46], that is, about from 18.4 Gyr (corresponding to point a) to 25.2 Gyr (corresponding to point b) after the beginning of the Universe in purely kinetic k-essence cosmology

From the observation of the very old quasar APM the Universe is more than 2.1 Gyr old [47] at , which contradicts the age ( Gyr) predicted by standard CDM cosmology [7]. In fact, the age of the quasar APM is still in debate, which is dependent on the Fe/O abundance ratio. The age of this quasar was initially estimated to be around 2-3 Gyr [48] and reevaluated to be 2.1 Gyr by using a chemodynamical model for the evolution of spheroids [47]. The age of 2.1 Gyr is set by the condition that Fe/O abundance ratio of the model reaches 3.3, which is the best-fitting value obtained in [49] (for detail see [7]). Of course, new and more reliable determination of the age of APM are also needed. We mention in passing that when Dunlop et al. paper first came out, the 3.5 Gyr age of 53W091 at was a significant problem for a non- cosmology [50]; however, soon thereafter papers came out that did spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting of its Keck spectrum that allowed new age estimates of around 1.8 Gyr [51, 52]. In addition, as discussed in [7], to understand the age problem better, we must be taking into account more recent observations on the value of the Hubble constant and more recent results on iron nucleosynthesis.

As seen in Figure 1, the equal-age line for 2.1 Gyr requires that . Since physically must be true, therefore the age of the Universe at must be significantly older than 2.1 Gyr, in agreement with data. In fact, the equal-age line for 2.1 Gyr crosses at , implying that astrophysical objects at the same age as the quasar APM may be found up to , since at such high redshift the Universe should be dominated by dusk-like matter, that is, . This prediction may also be tested with high redshift observations of galaxies and quasars in the future.

We note, however, that after the dark-energy-dominated epoch, k-essence must be characterized by imaginary sound speed, this seems somewhat unreasonable. However, is not a sufficient condition for a theory to be stable [53]. When the generation of shear in the fluid is taken into account, the perturbation growth for can be stabilized [54]. This issue is worthy of further studying.

3. Conclusions and Discussions

To summarize, an equation of state of purely kinetic k-essence is obtained under a simple hypothesis but without any assumptions about the form of in k-essence cosmology. This equation indicates that cosmic acceleration can only be induced after the dark-matter-dominated epoch. Because of dynamical reasons, there does not exist an epoch completely filled up by dark matter in purely kinetic k-essence cosmology. In this model of k-essence, the age of the Universe is about 33.5 Gyr now, the epoch when a transition from deceleration to acceleration expansion happened is about 18.4 to 25.2 Gyr after the beginning of the Universe, the Universe is much older than 2.1 Gyr at , and very old astrophysical objects with ages of around 2.1 Gyr exist up to redshift of 5.3. These results can be tested observationally in the future.

Acknowledgments

This study is supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. 11147028, Hebei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant no. A2011201147, and Research Fund for Doctoral Programs of Hebei University under Grant no. 2009-155.

References

A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis et al., “Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 1009–1038, 1998.

S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber et al., “Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 high-redshift Supernovae,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 517, no. 2, pp. 565–586, 1999.

M. Tegmark, M. A. Strauss, M. R. Blanton et al., “Cosmological parameters from SDSS and WMAP,” Physical Review D, vol. 69, no. 10, Article ID 103501, 2004.

D. N. Spergel, L. Verde, H. V. Peiris et al., “First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: determination of cosmological parameters,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 175–194, 2003.

S. Weinberger, “The cosmological constant problem,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1989.

V. Sahni and A. Starobinsky, “The case for a postive cosmological λ-term,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 373–443, 2000.

R. J. Yang and S. N. Zhang, “The age problem in the ΛCDM model,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 407, no. 3, pp. 1835–1841, 2010.

B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, “Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field,” Physical Review D, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 3406–3427, 1988.

R. R. Caldwell, “A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state,” Physics Letters, Section B, vol. 545, no. 1-2, pp. 23–29, 2002.

S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 2, Article ID 023509, 2003.

C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 21, pp. 4438–4441, 2000.

T. Padmanabhan, “Accelerated expansion of the universe driven by tachyonic matter,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 021301, 2002.

Z. Keresztes, L. Á. Gergely, V. Gorini, U. Moschella, and A. Y. Kamenshchik, “Tachyon cosmology, supernovae data, and the big brake singularity,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 8, Article ID 083504, 2009.

R. J. Yang, S. N. Zhang, and Y. Liu, “Constraints on the generalized tachyon field models from latest observational data,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2008, no. 1, article 017, 2008.

G. Dvali, G. Gabadadze, and M. Porrati, “4D gravity on a brane in 5D Minkowski space,” Physics Letters, Section B, vol. 485, no. 1–3, pp. 208–214, 2000.

R. -J. Yang, Z. -H. Zhu, and F. Wu, “Spatial Ricci scalar dark energy model,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 317–329, 2011.

C. Armendariz-Picon, V. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late-time cosmic acceleration,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 21, pp. 4438–4441, 2000.

C. Armendáriz-Picón, T. Damour, and V. Mukhanov, “k-inflation,” Physics Letters, Section B, vol. 458, no. 2-3, pp. 209–218, 1999.

L. R. Abramo and N. Pinto-Neto, “Stability of phantom k-essence theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 6, Article ID 063522, pp. 1–4, 2006.

A. D. Rendall, “Dynamics of k-essence,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1557–1569, 2006.

R. Das, T. W. Kephart, and R. J. Scherrer, “Tracking quintessence and k-essence in a general cosmological background,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 10, Article ID 103515, 2006.

T. Chiba, S. Dutta, and R. J. Scherrer, “Slow-roll k-essence,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 4, Article ID 043517, 2009.

X. T. Gao and R. J. Yang, “Geometrical diagnostic for purely kinetic k-essence dark energy,” Physics Letters, Section B, vol. 687, no. 2-3, pp. 99–102, 2010.

M. Malquarti, E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and M. Trodden, “A new view of k-essence,” Physical Review D, vol. 67, no. 12, Article ID 123503, 2003.

R. J. Scherrer, “Purely kinetic k essence as unified dark matter,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 1, Article ID 011301, 4 pages, 2004.

D. Bertacca, S. Matarrese, and M. Pietroni, “Unified dark matter in scalar field cosmologies,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 22, no. 38, pp. 2893–2907, 2007.

N. Bose and A. S. Majumdar, “K-essence model of inflation, dark matter, and dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 10, Article ID 103517, 2009.

R. J. Yang and X. T. Gao, “Observational constraints on purely kinetic k-essence dark energy models,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 26, no. 8, article 089501, 2009.

D. Zhang, “A natural topology for fuzzy numbers,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 264, no. 2, pp. 344–353, 2001.

A. A. Sen, “Reconstructing k-essence,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, no. 3, pp. 177–187, 2006.

R. de Putter and E. V. Linder, “Kinetic k-essence and quintessence,” Astroparticle Physics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 263–272, 2007.

R. J. Yang, J. Z. Qi, and B. Z. Yang, “Restrictions on purely kinetic k-essence,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 28, no. 10, Article ID 109502, 2011.

D. Gangopadhyay and S. Mukherjee, “On a cosmological invariant as an observational probe in the early universe,” Gravitation and Cosmology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 349–354, 2011.

J. Garriga and V. F. Mukhanov, “Perturbations in k-inflation,” Physics Letters, Section B, vol. 458, no. 2-3, pp. 219–225, 1999.

T. Chiba, “Tracking k-essence,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 063514, 2002.

L. P. Chimento and R. Lazkoz, “Atypical k-essence cosmologies,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 023505-1–023505-7, 2005.

C. Bonvin, C. Caprini, and R. Durrer, “No-Go theorem for k-essence dark energy,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 97, no. 8, Article ID 081303, 2006.

T. Padmanabhan and T. R. Choudhury, “Can the clustered dark matter and the smooth dark energy arise from the same scalar field?” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 8, Article ID 081301, pp. 813011–813014, 2002.

S. Hannestad, “Constraints on the sound speed of dark energy,” Physical Review D, vol. 71, no. 10, Article ID 103519, 9 pages, 2005.

L. R. Abramo and N. Pinto-Neto, “Stability of phantom k-essence theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 6, Article ID 063522, pp. 1–4, 2006.

R. Dave, R. R. Caldwell, and P. J. Steinhardt, “Sensitivity of the cosmic microwave background anisotropy to initial conditions in quintessence cosmology,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 023516, 2002.

D. N. Spergel, R. Bean, O. Doré et al., “Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: implications for cosmology,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 377–408, 2007.

T. R. Choudhury and T. Padmanabhan, “Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: a critical comparison of three data sets,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 429, no. 3, pp. 807–818, 2005.

W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, B. K. Gibson et al., “Final results from the Hubble Space Telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 553, no. 1, pp. 47–72, 2001.

A. G. Riess, L. G. Sirolger, J. Tonry et al., “Type Ia supernova discoveries at z > 1 from the hubble space telescope: evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 607, no. 2, pp. 665–687, 2004.

C. Firmani, G. Ghisellini, G. Ghirlanda, and V. Avila-Reese, “A new method optimized to use gamma-ray bursts as cosmic rulers,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 360, no. 1, pp. L1–L5, 2005.

A. C. S. Friaça, J. S. Alcaniz, and J. A. S. Lima, “An old quasar in a young dark energy-dominated universe?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 362, no. 4, pp. 1295–1300, 2005.

S. Komossa and G. Hasinger, “The X-ray evolving universe: (ionized) absorption and dust, from nearby Seyfert galaxies to high-redshift quasars,” in XEUS Studying the Evolution of the Universe, G. Hasinger, Th. Baller, and A. N. Parmar, Eds., p. 281, MPE, Garching, Germany, 2003, MPE Report.

G. Hasinger, N. Schartel, and S. Komossa, “Discovery of an ionized Fe K edge in the z = 3.91 broad absorption line quasar APM 08279 + 5255 with XMM-Newton,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 573, no. 2, pp. L77–L80, 2002.

J. Dunlop, J. Peacock, H. Spinrad et al., “A 3.5-Gyr-old galaxy at redshift 1.55,” Nature, vol. 381, no. 6583, pp. 581–584, 1996.

S. Yi, T. M. Brown, S. Heap et al., “On the age estimation of LBDS 53W091,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 533, no. 2, pp. 670–681, 2000.

A. G. Bruzual and C. G. Magris, “A revised age for the z = 1.55 galaxy LBDS 53W091,” in Cosmological Parameters and the Evolution of the Universe, K. Sato, Ed., Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 183, p. 152, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1999.

S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, “Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?” Physical Review D, vol. 68, no. 2, Article ID 023509, 2003.

T. Koivisto and D. F. Mota, “Dark energy anisotropic stress and large scale structure formation,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, no. 8, Article ID 083502, pp. 1–12, 2006.