ISRN Analytical ChemistryVolume 2013 (2013), Article ID 342794, 9 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/342794

Research Article

Stability-Indicating Validated Novel RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Methylparaben, Ketoconazole, and Mometasone Furoate in Topical Pharmaceutical Dosage Formulation

Chinmoy Roy1,2 and Jitamanyu Chakrabarty²

¹Analytical Research and Development, Integrated Product Development, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Bachupally, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 500090, India²Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology, West Bengal, Durgapur 713209, India

Received 3 June 2013; Accepted 7 July 2013

Academic Editors: T. Macko, M. Özgür, and I. Zhukov

Copyright © 2013 Chinmoy Roy and Jitamanyu Chakrabarty. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A simple, specific, precise, and accurate RP-HPLC method has been developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of Methylparaben (MP), Ketoconazole (KT), and Mometasone Furoate (MF) topical pharmaceutical dosage formulation. The separation was achieved by Waters X Terra C18 column using mobile phase consisting of buffer (triethyl amine in water, pH adjusted to 6.5 with glacial acetic acid)-acetonitrile (40 : 60, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and detection at 250 nm. The method showed linearity with correlation coefficient <0.9999 over the range of 0.12–15.2 μg/mL, 0.67–149.4 μg/mL, and 0.42–7.6 μg/mL for MP, KT, and MF, respectively. The mean recoveries were found to be in the range of 99.9–101.1% for all the components. The method was validated as per the ICH guidelines for linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, accuracy, precision, robustness and solution stability. Stability indicating capability of the developed method was established by analyzing forced degradation of samples in which spectral purity of MP, KT, and MF along with separation of degradation products from analytes peak was achieved. The method can be successfully applied for routine analysis of quantitative determination of MP, KT, and MF in pharmaceutical dosage form.

1. Introduction

Mometasone Furoate (MF), (11β, 16α)-9, 21-dichloro-11-hydroxy-16-methyl-3, 20-dioxopregna-1, 4-dien-17-yl 2-furoate (Figure 1(a)) is a topical corticosteroid; it has anti-inflammatory, antipruritic, and vasoonstrictive properties. Mometasone inhibits the action of allergic reactions, eczema, and psoriasis that cause inflammation, redness, and swelling [1, 2]. Ketoconazole (KT), an imidazole derivative, chemically 1-[4-(4-{[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-(1H-imidazol-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methoxy}phenyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethan-1-one (Figure 1(b)) is an antifungal agent with topical and systemic action and can be incorporated into several pharmaceutical forms. As for example a ketoconazole shampoo is effective against seborrhoeic dermatitis as well as Pityriasis versicolor [3–7]. KT and MF in combined dosage form are used in the treatment of mild to moderate inflamed cutaneous mycoses with antimycotic activity.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: Chemical structure of (a) Mometasone Furoate, (b) Ketoconazole, and (c) Methylparaben.

The preservative system is an important part of semisolid formulations in preventing the deterioration of formulations from microbial contamination. Methylparaben (MP) (Figure 1(c)) and its salts are most commonly used as preservatives for many years. To establish their effectiveness throughout the shelf life of the product, the actual concentrations of preservatives must be determined, as also required by regulatory agencies [8].

The finished product release specifications should include an identification test and a content determination test with acceptance criteria and limits for each antimicrobial preservative present in the formulation [9]. The finished product self-life specification should also include an identification test and limits for the antimicrobial preservatives present [10].

A detailed literature survey for Mometasone Furoate, Ketoconazole, and Methylparaben revealed that determination of individual compound or combination with other drugs has been reported by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [1, 2, 4, 9, 11–33], polarographic techniques [34], liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) [35–38], electrophoresis [39, 40], subcritical-fluid chromatography (SFC) [41], spectrophotometric techniques [42–44], and high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) [45]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method reported for the simultaneous estimation of Mometasone furoate, Ketoconazole, and Methylparabenin topical pharmaceutical dosage formulation.

The drug product stability guideline Q1A (R2) issued by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) [46] suggests that stress studies should be carried out on a drug to establish its inherent stability characteristics, leading to identification of degradation products and, hence, supporting the suitability of the proposed analytical procedures. It also requires that analytical procedures for testing the stability of samples should be stability indicating and should be fully validated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

MF and KT sample working standards were provided by Dr. Reddy’s Lab, India. HPLC grade acetonitrile, triethylamine, and glacial acetic acid were used of Rankem, India. 0.22  μm nylon membrane, 0.22  μm PVDF syringe filter, and 0.22  μm Nylon syringe filter were used of Millipore, India. Water for HPLC was generated using Milli-Q Plus water purification system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA).

2.2. Chromatographic Parameters and Equipments

All chromatographic experiments were performed on Waters Alliance HPLC system (Waters, Empower 2 software, USA), photo stability chamber (Sanyo, Leicestershire, UK), dry air oven (Cintex, Mumbai, India), XS205 dual range balance (Mettler Toledo), and cintex digital water bath were used for specificity study. All chromatographic experiments were performed in the isocratic mode. Separation was achieved on Waters X-Terra (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column as stationary phase by using mixture of buffer (0.2% v/v triethyl amine in water, pH adjusted to 6.5 with glacial acetic acid) : acetonitrile (40 : 60, v/v) as mobile phase. Other parameters such as run time 6.0 minutes, 1.5 mL/min as flow rate, injection volume of 10 μL, and column temperature of 50°C were finalized during development. MP, KT, and MF were detected at 250 nm. Mixture of acetonitrile : water, 80 : 20, v/v was used as diluent.

The stress-degraded samples and the solution stability samples were analyzed using a photo diode array (PDA) detector covering the range of 200–400 nm.

2.3. Procedure

2.3.1. Standard Solution Preparation

The stock solutions of MP (100  μg/mL), KT (1000  μg/mL), and MF (100  μg/mL) were prepared by dissolving an appropriate amount of analyte in diluent separately. Working standard solution was prepared by mixing above stock solutions of MP, KT, and MF with final concentration of 10  μg/mL, 100  μg/mL, and 5  μg/mL respectively.

2.3.2. Sample Preparation

An accurately weighed 0.5 g sample (equivalent to 10 mg of KT, 0.5 mg of MF) was taken into 100 mL volumetric flask. About 70 mL mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20, v/v) was added to this volumetric flask and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 15 min. with intermittent shaking, diluted to the volume with acetonitrile. and mixed well. A portion of solution was filtered through 0.22 μm Nylon syringe filter.

2.3.3. Placebo Preparation

An accurately weighed 0.5 g placebo sample was taken into 100 mL volumetric flask. About 70 mL mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20,v/v) was added to this and sonicated for 15 min with intermittent shaking, diluted to the volume with acetonitrile, and mixed well. A portion of solution was filtered through 0.22 μm Nylon syringe filter.

2.4. Procedure for Method Validation

The method was validated for linearity, precision, accuracy solution stability, filter compatibility, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), specificity-forced degradation studies, and robustness as per ICH guidelines.

2.4.1. System Suitability

To ensure that HPLC testing system was suitable for the intended application, the system suitability was assessed by five replicate analyses of system suitability solution (standard solution) and chromatographic parameters were evaluated. The acceptance criteria were not more than 2.0% for the RSD of the peak areas and tailing factor of the analyte peaks. The acceptance criteria were not less than 3000 for the plate count of the MP, KT and MF peaks.

2.4.2. Specificity-Forced Degradation Studies

The forced degradation studies were executed to demonstrate whether the analytical method was stability indicating and could unequivocally assess the analyte in the presence of impurities and degradation products. Combined lotion of MP, MF, and KT was stressed under thermolytic, photolytic, acid hydrolytic, base hydrolytic, and oxidative stress conditions to result in partial degradation of the drugs. All stress decomposition studies were performed at an initial drug concentration of 10, 100, and 5 μg/mL for MP, KT, and MF, respectively.

(1) Thermal Stressed Sample. For thermal stress testing, the lotion sample was placed in convection oven and exposed to heat at 75°C for 6 h.

(2) Photolytic Light Stressed Sample. For photo stress testing, the lotion sample was placed in photolytic chamber and expose to UV and visible light (1.2 million lux hours and 200 wh/m²).

(3) Acid Degradation Sample. For acid hydrolysis, solution was prepared by dispersing and dissolving lotion sample into 15 mL mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20, %v/v). Acid hydrolysis was performed by adding 1 mL of 5 N HCl and mixture was kept at 70°C on water bath for 30 minutes. The solution was neutralized with 1 mL of 5 N NaOH and further proceeded as per sample preparation.

(4) Base Degradation Sample. For base hydrolysis, solution was prepared by dispersing and dissolving lotion sample into 15 mL mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20, %v/v). Base hydrolysis was performed by adding 1 mL of 0.05 N NaOH and mixture was kept at room temperature for 15 minutes. The solution was neutralized with 1 mL of 0.05 N HCl and proceeded further as per sample preparation.

(5) Peroxide Oxidation Sample. For oxidation study, solution was prepared by dispersing and dissolving lotion sample into 15 mL mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20, %v/v). Oxidative study was performed by adding 1 mL of 30% v/v hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and the mixture was kept at room temperature for 45 minutes. It was processed further as per sample preparation.

2.4.3. Precision

The precision of the developed method was assessed by performing repeatability and intermediate precision (interday) at an initial drug concentration of 10, 100, and 5 μg/mL for MP, KT, and MF, respectively, in one day. %RSD was calculated to determine repeatability of precision. These studies were also repeated on different days to determine interday precision.

2.4.4. Accuracy

To confirm the method’s accuracy, recovery experiments were checked by standard addition method. The recovery experiments were performed in triplicate at 50, 100, and 150% concentration levels of the amount of the analytes in in-house mixture of lotion excipients (placebo).

2.4.5. Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantification

The standard solutions of MP, KT, and MF for the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were prepared by diluting them in mixture of acetonitrile and water (80 : 20, %v/v) sequentially. The LOD and LOQ were determined by analyzing signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for each compound involving a series of diluted solutions until the S/N ratio yield 3 for LOD and 10 for LOQ, respectively.

2.4.6. Linearity

Six levels of calibration standard solutions were prepared from the stock solutions at concentration range 0.12–15.2 μg/mL for MP, 0.67–149.4 μg/mL for KT, and 0.42–7.6 μg/mL for MF to encompass the expected concentration in measured samples. Calibration curves were constructed by plotting areas versus concentrations of MP, KT, and MF and then subjected to least-square linear regression analysis.

2.4.7. Robustness

To determine the robustness of the method the experimental conditions were deliberately changed. The flow rate of the mobile phase ( mL/min), column oven temperature (°C), mobile phase buffer pH (), and acetonitrile composition (%) were varied. In each case, the %RSD values were calculated for the obtained peak area. The number of theoretical plates and tailing factors was compared with that obtained under the optimized conditions.

2.4.8. Solution Stability

In order to demonstrate the stability of sample solutions, the solution was tested at intervals of 0, 12, 24 h by its storage at ambient temperature. The stability of solutions was appreciated by comparing assay results of peak area of MP, KT and MF.

2.4.9. Filter Compatibility

Filter compatibility was performed for nylon 0.22 μm syringe filter (Millipore) and PVDF 0.22 μm syringe filter (Millipore). To confirm the filter compatibility in the proposed method, filtration recovery experiment was carried out by sample filtration technique. Sample was filtered through both syringe filters, and percentage assay was determined and compared against centrifuged sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Method Development and Optimization

The prime objective of this study was an RP-HPLC method development for determination of Methylparaben, Ketoconazole, and Mometasone furoate in pharmaceutical dosage form and determination of assay of drug in single run which should be accurate, reproducible, robust, and stability indicating. All degradation products from stress conditions should be well separated from each other and the method should be simple to be effective in analytical research and quality control laboratory for routine use.

3.2. Mobile Phase and Chromatographic Conditions Optimization

Optimization of column selection and mobile phase selection were done simultaneously. An isocratic method was employed using buffer (0.2% v/v triethyl amine in water, pH was adjusted to 6.5 with glacial acetic acid) : acetonitrile (60 : 40 v/v) as mobile phase. X-Terra C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μ) column with flow rate 1.5 mL/min and column temperature 50°C were used in HPLC equipped with photo diode array detector. MF peak fronting was observed and peak eluted too late. To reduce run time and improve MF peak shape, an attempt was made by increasing acetonitrile composition in mobile phase, which then became buffer (0.2% v/v triethyl amine in water, pH 6.5 adjusted with glacial acetic acid) : acetonitrile (40 : 60 v/v). Due to early elution of MP peak (1.2 minute), plate count was found to be 1500. To retain the MP peak, an attempt was made by increasing column length X-Terra C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μ). MP, KT, and MF peaks eluted at RT 2.3, 3.0, and 4.6 minutes, respectively. Plate count for MP peak was more than 4000. Resolution between MP, KT was 4.8 and KT, MF was 6.5. Considering solubility of all the component mixture of acetonitrile : water, 80 : 20 %v/v was used as diluent and satisfactory recovery was achieved.

3.3. Analytical Method Validation

After satisfactory development of method, it was subjected to method validation as per ICH guideline [47].

3.3.1. System Suitability

System suitability parameters were measured so as to verify the system, method, and column performance. The % RSD (relative standard deviation) of MP, KT and MF area count of five replicate injections (standard preparation) were 0.27, 0.17, and 0.44, respectively. Low values of % RSD of replicate injections indicate that the system is precise. The tailing factor for MF, EN, and MP peaks was 1.1, 1.0, and 1.0. The efficiency of the column was expressed as the number of theoretical plates. Results of theoretical plates for MF, KT, and MF peaks are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: System suitability results (precision, intermediate precision, and robustness) for MP, KT, and MF.

Parameters
MP
KT
MF

>3000
≤2.0
≤2.0

>3000
≤2.0
≤2.0

>3000
≤2.0
≤2.0

%*
RT

%*
RT

%*
RT

Precision
4190
1.1
0.27
2.301
4270
1.0
0.17
3.095
5472
1.0
0.44
4.665

Interprecision
4452
1.1
0.22
2.306
4268
1.1
0.27
3.101
5476
1.0
0.33
4.674

1.7 mL/min flow rate
3881
1.1
0.29
2.040
3781
1.1
0.14
2.733
5007
1.0
0.83
4.137

1.3 mL/min flow rate
4923
1.1
0.22
2.637
4812
1.1
0.19
3.541
6149
1.0
0.32
5.322

55°C column temp.
4455
1.1
0.24
2.278
4365
1.1
0.31
3.058
5607
1.0
0.25
4.486

45°C column temp.
4514
1.1
0.39
2.341
4199
1.1
0.25
3.135
5580
1.0
0.61
4.844

Mobile phase pH 6.7
4289
1.1
0.29
2.302
4271
1.1
0.07
3.095
5548
1.0
1.01
4.659

Mobile phase pH 6.3
4316
1.1
0.17
2.303
4261
1.1
0.16
3.086
5565
1.0
0.56
4.644

+3.5% Acetonitrile
4422
1.1
0.35
2.271
4170
1.1
0.33
2.940
5480
1.0
1.02
4.282

−3.5% Acetonitrile
4323
1.1
0.59
2.368
4497
1.0
0.17
3.345
5641
1.0
0.69
5.242

: plate count, : tailing factor, : relative standard deviation, RT: retention time, *determined on five values.

3.3.2. Specificity

Specificity is the ability of the method to measure the analyte response in the presence of its potential impurities [47]. Forced degradation studies were performed to demonstrate selectivity and stability indicating capability of the proposed RP-HPLC method. Figure 2 shows that there is no interference at the RT (retention time) of MP, KT and MF in presence of blank and placebo.

Figure 2: Typical overlay chromatogram of blank, placebo, and standards.

Force degradation studies of drug product containing MP, KT, and MF were also performed to evaluate the stability-indicating property and specificity of the proposed method. The solutions of drug product and placebo were exposed to acid hydrolysis, alkali, peroxide oxidation, thermal exposure, and photolytic exposure. KT was found sensitive to acid hydrolysis than MF. During acid hydrolysis process, about 54.1% of KT degraded and one major degradation peak was observed at 2.852 min, 8.1% of MP degraded while no degradation was observed in case of MF. MF was found to be more sensitive to base hydrolysis than KT. During base hydrolysis process, about 11.3% of MF degraded and main degradation peaks were observed at 4.911, 5.164 min, while no degradation was observed in case of KT and MP. During peroxide oxidation process, about 12.4% of KT degraded, but no significant degradation was observed for MP and MF. During photolytic degradation process, about 17.8% of KT degraded and main degradation peak was observed at 2.636 min, while no degradation was observed in case of MF and MP. No significant degradation was observed in case of thermal degradation of sample. Typical chromatograms obtained from assay of stressed lotion sample are shown in Figure 3, acid degradation (a), base degradation (b), peroxide oxidation (c), thermal exposed (d), and photo exposed (e) sample. MF, KT and MP were investigated for spectral purity in the chromatogram of all exposed samples and found spectrally pure. The purity and assay of MP, MF, and KT were unaffected by the presence of its degradation products and thus confirms the stability-indicating power of the developed method. Results from forced degradation study are given in Table 2.

Table 2: Results of forced degradation study for MP, KT, and MF.

Stress conditions
MP
KT
MF

PA
PTH
% Deg.
PA
PTH
% Deg.
PA
PTH
% Deg.

Acidic hydrolysis (5 N HCl, 70°C, 30 mins)
0.319
1.105
8.1
0.126
1.181
54.1
0.655
1.950
ND

Alkaline hydrolysis (0.05 N NaOH, RT, 15 mins)
0.286
1.113
ND
0.173
1.141
ND
1.181
2.057
11.3

Oxidation (30% H₂O₂, RT, 45 min)
0.094
1.127
ND
0.204
1.159
12.4
0.760
2.029
ND

Thermal (At 80°C, 6 h)
0.165
1.179
ND
0.177
1.143
ND
1.286
2.216
ND

UV and visible light exposed
0.286
1.113
4.2
0.173
1.141
17.8%
1.181
2.057
ND

N.D.: no degradation, RT: room temperature, PA: purity angle, PTH: purity threshold.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 3: Typical overlay chromatograms of (a) acid degradation sample and placebo, (b) base degradation sample and placebo, (c) peroxide oxidation sample and placebo, (d) thermal exposed sample and placebo, and (e) photolytic light exposed sample and placebo.

3.3.3. Method Precision

The Precision of assay method was evaluated by carrying out six independent determinations of 10 μg/mL of MP, 100 μg/mL of KT, and 5 μg/mL of MF lotion samples against qualified working standards. The average % assay () of MP, KT, and MF were 100.5%, 99.7% and 100.2%, respectively, with RSD of below 0.8%. Low values of % RSD indicate that the method is precise. Results are presented in Table 3.

Table 3: Method precision, intermediate precision result, LOD, LOQ evaluation, and linearity data for MP, KT, and MF.

Parameter
MP
KT
MF

Precision day-1 ()(% Assay ± SD; % RSD)
100.5 ± 0.48; 0.48
99.7 ± 0.43; 0.43
100.2 ± 0.76; 0.75

Intermediate precision day-2 ()(% Assay ± SD; % RSD)
100.0 ± 0.32; 0.32
100.4 ± 0.17; 0.17
101.3 ± 0.59; 0.58

LOD (g/mL)
0.033
0.204
0.123

LOQ (g/mL)
0.12
0.67
0.42

Linearity range (g/mL)
0.12–15.2
0.67–149.4
0.42–7.6

Correlation coefficient
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999

Intercept ()
1485.841
415.816
−1614.022

Slope ()
72985.066
17217.396
35584.579

Bias at 100% response
−0.202
0.024
−0.914

3.3.4. Intermediate Precision (Reproducibility)

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the reliability of the test results with variations. The reproducibility was checked by analyzing the samples by different analyst using different chromatographic system and column on different day. Results are presented in Table 3.

3.3.5. Accuracy

The accuracy was evaluated applying the proposed method to the analysis of the in-house mixture of cream excipients with known amount of the drug, to obtain solutions at concentrations of 5.05, 10.10, and 15.15 μg/mL for MP; 49.80, 99.60, and 149.40 μg/mL for KT; 2.53, 5.05 and 7.58 μg/mL for MF. The accuracy was assessed from three replicate determinations and calculated as the μg/mL drug recovered from the drug matrix. The means and RSD% obtained from the recovery studies are shown in Table 4 with ranges of 99.9–101.1%, 100.2–101.1%, and 99.9–100.8% for MP, KT, and MF, respectively, demonstrating that the method is accurate within the desired range and also there is no interference due to excipients present in placebo cream sample.

Table 4: Accuracy results for MP, KT, and MF.

Active components
Amount added (g/mL)
Amount recovered (g/mL)
% Recovery#  ± SD; % RSD*

MP
5.05
5.11
101.1 ± 0.17; 0.17

10.10
10.19
100.9 ± 0.63; 0.62

15.15
15.14
99.9 ± 0.12; 0.12

KT
49.8
50.37
101.1 ± 0.05; 0.05

99.6
100.41
100.8 ± 0.25; 0.25

149.4
149.63
100.2 ± 0.13; 0.13

MF
2.53
2.54
100.8 ± 0.62; 0.62

5.05
5.06
99.9 ± 0.36; 0.36

7.58
7.57
99.9 ± 0.48; 0.48

Determined on three values. #Mean of three determinations.

3.3.6. Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ)

The LOD and LOQ were determined at a signal to noise ratio of 3 : 1 and 10 : 1, respectively, by injecting a series of dilute solutions with known concentrations. The limit of detection and limit of quantification values of MP, KT, and MF are reported in Table 3.

3.3.7. Linearity

Linearity was demonstrated from LOQ % to 150% of standard concentration using minimum six calibration levels of test concentration (LOQ-15.2 μg/mL for MP, LOQ-149.4 μg/mL for KT and LOQ-7.6 μg/mL for MF), which gave us a good confidence on analytical method with respect to linear range. The response was found linear for all MP, KT, and MF from LOQ to 150% of standard concentration and correlation coefficient was also found greater than 0.9999. Bias was found within ±1.0. The result of correlation coefficients, Y-intercept of the calibration curve and % bias at 100% response for MP, KT, and MF are presented in Table 3.

3.3.8. Robustness

The robustness as a measure of method capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate, changes in chromatographic conditions was studied by testing influence of small changes in flow rate (±0.2 mL/min), change in column oven temperature (±5°C), mobile phase buffer pH (±0.2), and mobile phase organic composition (±3.5% acetonitrile). No significant effect was observed on system suitability parameters such as theoretical plates, tailing factor, and % RSD of MP, KT, and MF. The results are presented in Table 1 along with system suitability parameters of precision and intermediate precision study.

3.3.9. Stability of Sample Solution

Stability of sample solution was established by storage of sample solution at ambient temperature for 24 h. The assay of MP, KT, and MF was analyzed. It was found that % labeled amounts of MP at 0, 12, and 24 hrs were 99.8, 100.5, and 99.8, respectively; % labeled amounts of KT were 98.9, 99.1, and 98.7, respectively, and % labeled amount of MF were 100.1, 100.8, and 100.1, respectively.

3.3.10. Filter Compatibility

Sample solution did not show any significant change in assay percentage with respect to centrifuged sample. It was found that % labeled amount of MP at centrifuged sample, 0.22 μm PVDF syringe filter, and 0.22 μm Nylon syringe filter were 100.5, 100.2, and 100.7, respectively; KT were 98.6, 98.4, and 98.8, respectively; and MF were 100.0, 99.5, and 100.9, respectively. In the result, difference in % assay was not more than ±1.0, which indicates that both syringe filters have a good compatibility with sample solution.

4. Conclusions

An isocratic RP-HPLC method was successfully developed for the estimation of Methylparaben, Ketoconazole, and Mometasone Furoate in topical pharmaceutical dosage form. The method validation results have proved that the method is selective, precise, accurate, linear, robust, filter compatible and stability indicating. Forced degradation data proved that the method is specific for the analytes and free from the interference of placebo/known impurities/and degradation products. The run time (6.0 min) enables rapid determination of drug. Moreover, it may be applied for determination of Methylparaben, Ketoconazole, and Mometasone Furoate in the study of content uniformity, tube homogeneity, and in-vitro release test profiling of topical dosage forms, where sample load is higher and high throughput is essential for faster delivery of results. The developed method is stability-indicating and can be used for quantifying Methylparaben, Ketoconazole, and Mometasone Furoate in topical pharmaceutical dosage forms and their combinations, that is, MP+MF, MP+KT, MF+KT, and MP+MF+KT.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they do not have a direct financial relation with the commercial identity mentioned in this paper that might lead to a conflict of interests for any of the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank M/s Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. for supporting this work. The authors’ Intellectual Property Management (IPM) department has given this paper an internal publication number as PUB00236-13.

References

K. Srinivasarao, V. Gorule, R. C. Venkata, and K. A. Venkata, “A validated method development for estimation of formoterol fumarate and mometasone furoate in metered dose inhalation form HPLC,” Journal of Analytical Bioanalytical Techniques, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1–4, 2012.

S. Shaikh, M. S. Muneera, O. A. Thusleem, M. Tahir, and A. V. Kondaguli, “A simple RP-HPLC method for the simultaneous quantitation of chlorocresol, mometasone furoate, and fusidic acid in creams,” Journal of Chromatographic Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 178–183, 2009.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketoconazole

I. Staub and A. M. Bergold, “Determination of ketoconazole in shampoo by high performance liquid chromatography,” Acta Farmaceutica Bonaerense, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 387–390, 2004.

R. U. Peter and U. Richarz-Barthauer, “Successful treatment and prophylaxis of scalp seborrhoeic dermatitis and dandruff with 2% ketoconazole shampoo: results of a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 441–445, 1995.

C. Piérard-Franchimont, G. E. Piérard, J. E. Arrese, and P. de Doncker, “Effect of ketoconazole 1% and 2% shampoos on severe dandruff and seborrhoeic dermatitis: clinical, squamometric and mycological assessments,” Dermatology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 2001.

R. Giordani, J. Trebaux, M. Masi, and P. Regli, “Enhanced antifungal activity of ketoconazole by Euphorbia characias latex against Candida albicans,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2001.

J. Boonleang and C. Tanthana, “Simultaneous stability-indicating hplc method for the determination of cisapride, methylparaben and propylparaben in oral suspension,” Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 379–385, 2010.

European Medicines Agency, “Guideline on excipients in the dossier for application for marketing authorisation of a medicinal product,” Doc. Ref. EMEA/CHMP/QWP/396951/ 2006, London, UK, 2006.

ICH Q6A, “Specifications: test procedures and acceptance criteria for new drug substances and new drug products: chemical substances,” in International Conference on Harmonization, 1999.

X. W. Teng, K. Foe, K. F. Brown, D. J. Cutler, and N. M. Davies, “High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of mometasone furoate and its degradation products: application to in vitro degradation studies,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 313–319, 2001.

J. Zhu and C. Coscolluella, “Chromatographic assay of pharmaceutical compounds under column overloading,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 741, no. 1, pp. 55–65, 2000.

J. C. H. Donovan and J. G. DeKoven, “Cross-reactions to desoximetasone and mometasone furoate in a patient with multiple topical corticosteroid allergies,” Dermatitis, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 147–151, 2006.

H. C. Korting, K. Maslen, G. Gross, and C. Willers, “Comparison of activity of different topical corticosteroid creams and ointments using a vasoconstriction assay: superiority of hydrocortisone butyrate over hydrocortisone,” Journal of the German Society of Dermatology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 348–353, 2005.

K. A. Shaikh and A. T. Patil, “Stability-indicating HPLC method for the determination of mometasone furoate, oxymetazoline, phenyl ethanol and benzalkonium chloride in nasal spray solution,” Journal of Trace Analysis in Food and Drugs, vol. 1, pp. 14–21, 2013.

USP 29 NF 24, United States Pharmacopoeia, U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, USA, 2006.

The United States Pharmacopoeia, 32th NF 27, Ketoconazole, United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockwille, MD, USA, pp.2737–2738, 2009

European Pharmacopoeia, Ketoconazole 01/2008:0921 corrected 6.0, European Pharmacopoeia Commission, 6th edition, 2008.

E. R. M. Kedor-Hackmann, M. M. F. Nery, and M. I. R. M. Santoro, “Determination of ketoconazole in pharmaceutical preparations by ultraviolet spectrophotometry and HPLC,” Analytical Letters, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 363–376, 1994.

A. Kumar, P. Srinivas, K. Spandana, N. Rama, and J. VidyaSagar, “Rapid and sensitive HPLC method for the determination of sirolimus with ketoconazole as internal standard and its further applications,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Drug Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 70–73, 2012.

R. K. Jat, S. Sharma, R. C. Chhipa, R. Singh, and I. Alam, “Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for estimation of ketoconazole in bulk drug,” Pharmacophore, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 2012.

V. K. Venishetty, N. Parikh, R. Sistla, F. J. Ahmed, and P. V. Diwan, “Application of validated RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of docetaxel and ketoconazole in solid lipid nanoparticles,” Journal of Chromatographic Science, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2011.

R. A. Mhaske and S. Sahasrabudhe, “Identification of major degradation products of Ketoconazole,” Scientia Pharmaceutica, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 817–836, 2011.

Y. V. Heyden, A. N. M. Nguyet, M. R. Detaevernier, D. L. Massart, and J. Plaizier-Vercammen, “Simultaneous determination of ketoconazole and formaldehyde in a shampoo: liquid chromatography method development and validation,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 958, no. 1-2, pp. 191–201, 2002.

A. N. M. Nguyet, L. Tallieu, J. Plaizier-Vercammen, D. L. Massart, and Y. V. Heyden, “Validation of an HPLC method on short columns to assay ketoconazole and formaldehyde in shampoo,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2003.

E. M. Abdel-Moety, F. I. Khattab, K. M. Kelani, and A. M. AbouAl-Alamein, “Chromatographic determination of clotrimazole, ketoconazole and fluconazole in pharmaceutical formulations,” Farmaco, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 931–938, 2002.

M. V. Vertzoni, C. Reppas, and H. A. Archontaki, “Optimization and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatographic method with UV detection for the determination of ketoconazole in canine plasma,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 839, no. 1-2, pp. 62–67, 2006.

K. H. Yuen and K. K. Peh, “Simple high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of ketoconazole in human plasma,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 715, no. 2, pp. 436–440, 1998.

S. Bajad, R. K. Johri, K. Singh, J. Singh, and K. L. Bedi, “Simple high-performance liquid chromatography method for the simultaneous determination of ketoconazole and piperine in rat plasma and hepatocyte culture,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 949, no. 1-2, pp. 43–47, 2002.

D. A. Hamdy and D. R. Brocks, “A stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of ketoconazole enantiomers in rat plasma,” Biomedical Chromatography, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 542–547, 2008.

P. de Bruijn, D. F. S. Kehrer, J. Verweij, and A. Sparreboom, “Liquid chromatographic determination of ketoconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4-mediated metabolism,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 753, no. 2, pp. 395–400, 2001.

I. Staub, L. Flores, G. Gosmann et al., “Photostability studies of ketoconazole: isolation and structural elucidation of the main photodegradation products,” Latin American Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1100–1106, 2010.

B. Gjorgjeska, “Determination of ketoconazole in tablets by using three different methods,” European Medical, Health and Pharmaceutical Journal, vol. 4, p. 8, 2012.

P. Arranz, A. Arranz, J. M. Moreda, A. Cid, and J. F. Arranz, “Stripping voltammetric and polarographic techniques for the determination of anti-fungal ketoconazole on the mercury electrode,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 589–596, 2003.

Q. Huang, G.-J. Wang, J.-G. Sun, X.-L. Hu, Y.-H. Lu, and Q. Zhang, “Simultaneous determination of docetaxel and ketoconazole in rat plasma by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1009–1018, 2007.

G. Chen, B. N. Pramanik, Y.-H. Liu, and U. A. Mirza, “Applications of LC/MS in structure identifications of small molecules and proteins in drug discovery,” Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 279–287, 2007.

S. Sahasranaman, Y. Tang, D. Biniasz, and G. Hochhaus, “A sensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the quantification of mometasone furoate in human plasma,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 819, no. 1, pp. 175–179, 2005.

Y.-L. Chen, L. Felder, X. Jiang, and W. Naidong, “Determination of ketoconazole in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 774, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2002.

I. Velikinac, O. Čudina, I. Janković, D. Agbaba, and S. Vladimirov, “Comparison of capillary zone electrophoresis and high performance liquid chromatography methods for quantitative determination of ketoconazole in drug formulations,” Farmaco, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 419–424, 2004.

K.-L. Kuo and Y.-Z. Hsieh, “Determination of preservatives in food products by cyclodextrin-modified capillary electrophoresis with multiwavelength detection,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 768, no. 2, pp. 334–341, 1997.

J. L. Bernal, M. J. del Nozal, L. Toribio, M. I. Montequi, and E. M. Nieto, “Separation of ketoconazole enantiomers by chiral subcritical-fluid chromatography,” Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, vol. 43, no. 1–3, pp. 241–250, 2000.

K. Farhadi and R. Maleki, “New spectrophotometric method for the determination of ketoconazole based on the oxidation reactions,” Analytical Sciences, vol. 17, pp. 867–870, 2001.

E. R. M. Kedor-Hackmann, M. I. R. M. Santoro, A. K. Singh, and A. C. Peraro, “First-derivative ultraviolet spectrophotometric and high performance liquid chromatographic determination of ketoconazole in pharmaceutical emulsions,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2006.

M. M. Ayad, M. M. EL-Henawee, H. E. Abdellatef, and H. M. EL Sayed, “Spectrophotometric determination of levonorgestrel, norethisterone acetate, mometasone furoate and fluticasone propionate using 4-amino-antipyrine,” Cairo Bull, vol. 43, no. 3, 2005.

A. Kulkarni, N. Rabindra, and N. Ranjane, “Simultaneous estimation of Nadifloxacin and Mometasone Furoate in topical cream by HPTLC method,” Der Pharma Chemica, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 25–30, 2010.

“Stability testing of new drug substances and products, Q1A (R2),” in International Conference on Harmonization (ICH '03), IFPMA, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003.

ICH, Validation of Analytical Procedure, Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), IFPMA, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.