ISRN RheumatologyVolume 2013 (2013), Article ID 907085, 4 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/907085

Clinical Study

Efficacy of Anti-TNF Agents as Adjunctive Therapy for Knee Synovitis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Peripheral Spondyloarthritis

Grigorios T. Sakellariou,¹ Athanasios D. Anastasilakis,² Ilias Bisbinas,³ Anastasios Gketsos,⁴ and Charalampos Berberidis¹

¹Department of Rheumatology, 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece²Department of Endocrinology, 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece³Department of Orthopaedics, 424 General Military Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece⁴Department of Orthopaedics, Bioclinic Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Received 29 April 2013; Accepted 26 May 2013

Academic Editors: M. Harth, H. Ihn, R. Marks, and E. Tchetina

Copyright © 2013 Grigorios T. Sakellariou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors as add-on therapy for knee synovitis that did not respond to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and other standard treatments in patients with peripheral spondyloarthritis (SpA). We retrospectively studied 27 SpA patients, in whom an anti-TNF agent was added for active peripheral arthritis with knee synovitis refractory to DMARDs and treatment with low-dose oral corticosteroids and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids. As response of knee synovitis, were considered the absence of swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of movement in the clinical examination, after 4 months of anti-TNF therapy. In twenty-four (88.9%) of the patients there was response of knee synovitis. No statistical differences in gender (), age (), disease subtype (), and pattern of arthritis () between knee synovitis responders and nonresponders were found. Fourteen patients managed to stop DMARD therapy and six, all of whom were initially on DMARDs combination, to decrease the number of DMARDs to one, maintaining simultaneously the response of knee synovitis. Our results imply a beneficial effect of adjunctive anti-TNF therapy on knee synovitis not responding to DMARDs and other standard treatments in patients with peripheral SpA.

1. Introduction

Diseases that belong to spondyloarthritides (SpA) are frequently manifested as asymmetric peripheral arthritis of the large joints with knee involvement. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are highly effective for the treatment of peripheral arthritis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [1, 2], psoriatic arthritis (PsA) [3], undifferentiated SpA (unSpA) [4], or SpA as a whole independently of the phenotypic disease [5], even in the case of arthritis resistant to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). However, data on the effect of anti-TNF therapy specifically on knee synovitis are limited in peripheral SpA [6]. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents as adjunctive therapy for knee synovitis that did not respond to DMARDs and other standard treatments in patients with peripheral SpA.

2. Patients and Methods

We retrospectively studied patients with SpA according to the European SpA Study Group criteria [7] and peripheral arthritis involving the knee joint, who were monitored every 2–4 months at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the 424 General Military Hospital (Thessaloniki, Greece) between January 2005 and January 2012. Inclusion criterion was the addition of an anti-TNF agent for active peripheral arthritis with knee synovitis unresponsive to DMARDs and standard treatment with low-dose oral corticosteroids (prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day) and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intra-articular (IA) corticosteroids. Exclusion criteria were (i) the use of IA corticosteroids and (ii) the increase of the DMARDs’ dose or the addition of a new DMARD during anti-TNF therapy. Knee synovitis was defined as the presence of at least 2 of the following 3 clinical criteria: swelling, tenderness, or decreased range of movement. As response of knee synovitis the absence of the aforementioned three clinical joint signs after 4 months of anti-TNF therapy were considered. The association of knee synovitis response with gender, age, disease subtype, and pattern of arthritis at anti-TNF initiation excluding interphalangeal joint involvement was also investigated.

Knee synovitis responders and nonresponders were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables and the test or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables. A value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS software for Windows, version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

Twenty-seven patients with peripheral SpA were studied. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Twenty-one patients were on DMARD monotherapy (9 on methotrexate (MTX), eight on leflunomide (LEF), and four on sulfasalazine (SSz)) while the remaining 6 patients were on DMARDs combination treatment (2 patients on MTX + LEF, two on MTX + SSz, one on MTX + cyclosporine A (CysA), and one on MTX + CysA + LEF). Thirteen patients received adalimumab, 8 infliximab, 4 etanercept, and 2 golimumab. In all but three of the patients there was response of knee synovitis to anti-TNF therapy, which sustained for an average observation period of 31.9 months. Furthermore, all knee synovitis responders achieved at least low disease activity (LDA) according to the disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28). Among the 3 patients with unresponsive knee synovitis, tenderness and decreased range of movement were the remaining signs in the two of them, who had psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with knee monoarthritis and achieved LDA. Knee joints of these two patients presented osteoarthritis grade 2 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence radiologic scoring system on X-ray, leading us not to consider treatment modification as appropriate approach, because the residual clinical signs of their knees were attributed to osteoarthritis secondary to joint destruction. In the third patient, who had oligoarticular PsA with remaining knee monoarthritis and achieved moderate disease activity (DAS28 = 3.29), both tenderness and swelling of the knee joint persisted. In this patient, whose knee X-ray was normal, a switch of adalimumab to infliximab was ineffective; finally, radiation synovectomy led to the resolution of knee synovitis. There were no differences in gender (), age (), disease subtype (), and pattern of arthritis () between knee synovitis responders and nonresponders. All patients stopped NSAIDs and oral corticosteroids. Fourteen patients (51.9%) managed to stop DMARD therapy, while the rest 13 patients (48.1%) remained on combination of anti-TNF agent and DMARD in order to maintain both knee synovitis response and disease activity on remission or LDA; however, in 6 of these patients, all initially on DMARDs combination, the number of DMARDs was decreased to one.

Table 1: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied patients.

Parameter
All patients ()
Knee synovitis responders ()
Knee synovitis nonresponders ()

Age (years)
43.3 ± 2.9
43.1 ± 3.2
44.7 ± 1.3

Age at disease onset (years)
36.0 ± 2.6
36.7 ± 2.8
30.7 ± 1.3

Time interval between initiation of DMARDs and anti-TNF agent (months)
11.4 ± 1.1
11.3 ± 1.3
11.9 ± 0.5

Male gender
19 (70.4)
16 (66.6)
3 (100.0)

Disease subtype

    AS
2 (7.4)
2 (8.3)
0 (0.0)

    PsA
17 (63.0)
14 (58.3)
3 (100.0)

    unSpA
8 (29.6)
8 (33.3)
0 (0.0)

HLA-B27*

    Positive
4 (66.6)
4 (66.6)
—

    Negative
2 (33.4)
2 (33.4)
—

Pattern of DMARD therapy before addition of anti-TNF agent

    Monotherapy
21 (77.8)
18 (75.0)
3 (100.0)

    Combination
6 (22.2)
6 (25.0)
0 (0.0)

Pattern of arthritis on anti-TNF initiation

    Monoarthritis
8 (29.6)
6 (25.0)
2 (66.6)

    Oligoarthritis (inflamed joints <4)
19 (70.4)
18 (75.0)
1 (33.4)

Current therapy

    Anti-TNF monotherapy
14 (51.9)
12 (50.0)
2 (66.6)

    Anti-TNF + DMARD
13 (48.1)
12 (50.0)
1 (33.4)

DMARDs: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; TNF: tumour necrosis factor; AS: ankylosing spondylitis; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; unSpA: undifferentiated spondyloarthritis.

*Included only the patients with known HLA-B27 status ().

Values given as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) or (%).

4. Discussion

There is only one study in the literature evaluating the efficacy of anti-TNF agents focusing on knee synovitis [6]. In this prospective study, including 20 patients with peripheral SpA and knee synovitis who received etanercept as monotherapy, a statistically significant decrease in the physician’s assessment of the knee joint (median visual analog score from 53.5 at baseline to <10 at week 12 and thereafter) was observed. Accordingly, clinical synovitis of the knee joint was present in all patients at baseline and decreased to a frequency of 12 (60%) of the 20 knee joints with synovitis at week 12 and 6 (30%) at week 52. In comparison, knee synovitis persisted in approximately 11% of our SpA patients at month 4 following anti-TNF addition. The combination of anti-TNF agent with DMARDs could explain the more favorable results of our study. Indeed, at least in regard to PsA, the superiority of anti-TNF agent plus MTX to MTX alone is well documented in MTX-naïve patients [8] and, according to the Danish registry, concomitant use of DMARD (MTX) is a predictor of clinical response in patients treated with an anti-TNF agent [9]. Furthermore, it has been reported that in PsA patients, early treatment before joint damage resulted in better outcome and polyarticular disease had poorer prognosis than oligoarticular disease [10, 11]. Thus, the addition of an anti-TNF agent shortly after DMARD failure (mean time interval between initiation of DMARDs and anti-TNF agent was 11.4 months, Table 1) and the fact that none of our patients with PsA had polyarticular disease could be additional reasons for the better response of knee synovitis in our study. Notably, the two PsA patients with radiographic damage of the affected knee joint at baseline were nonresponders to anti-TNF therapy. In conclusion, the high percentage of our SpA patients with knee synovitis responsive to anti-TNF agent may be explained by the combination of anti-TNF therapy with DMARDs and the presence of good response predictors in most of them, although in the literature this could be supported only for the PsA patients, who were the majority of the studied patients.

Our study has several limitations. It is a retrospective study with limited number of patients, who had heterogeneity on pattern of DMARD therapy and were treated with different anti-TNF agents and DMARDs. Furthermore, we did not include a control group. However, this is the first study to attempt to evaluate the efficacy of anti-TNF agents as adjunctive therapy for knee synovitis refractory to DMARDs in patients with peripheral SpA. In all patients, knee synovitis had already failed to respond to DMARDs and other standard treatments before the addition of an anti-TNF agent. Thus, it is reasonable to attribute knee synovitis response to anti-TNF therapy itself. The absence of swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of movement on clinical examination, which has been used as outcome in randomized controlled studies [12, 13], was considered as response of knee synovitis in our study. We used the term “response” over “remission” in order to exclude the possibility of mild knee joint inflammation not detectable with clinical examination.

5. Conclusion

Our results imply a sustained beneficial effect of adjunctive anti-TNF therapy on knee synovitis unresponsive to DMARDs and other standard treatments in patients with peripheral SpA. Because of both knee synovitis response and remission or LDA, approximately half of the patients stopped DMARDs and all patients on DMARDs combination decreased the number of them to one. However, large prospective studies are required to confirm our results.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

References

M. Rudwaleit, F. Van den Bosch, M. Kron, S. Kary, and H. Kupper, “Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis and history of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 12, no. 3, article R117, 2010.

J. Braun, I. E. Van Der Horst-Bruinsma, F. Huang et al., “Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, double-blind trial,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1543–1551, 2011.

Z. Ash, C. Gaujoux-Viala, L. Gossec et al., “A systematic literature review of drug therapies for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: current evidence and meta-analysis informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 319–326, 2012.

J. Brandt, A. Khariouzov, J. Listing et al., “Successful short term treatment of patients with severe undifferentiated spondyloarthritis with the anti-tumor necrosis factor-α fusion receptor protein etanercept,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 531–538, 2004.

F. Van Den Bosch, E. Kruithof, D. Baeten et al., “Randomized double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor α (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 755–765, 2002.

E. Kruithof, L. De Rycke, J. Roth et al., “Immunomodulatory effects of etanercept on peripheral joint synovitis in the spondylarthropathies,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3898–3909, 2005.

M. Dougados, S. Van der Linden, R. Juhlin et al., “The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1218–1227, 1991.

A. Baranauskaite, H. Raffayová, N. V. Kungurov et al., “Infliximab plus methotrexate is superior to methotrexate alone in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis in methotrexate-naive patients: The RESPOND Study,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 71, pp. 541–548, 2012.

B. Glintborg, M. Østergaard, L. Dreyer et al., “Treatment response, drug survival, and predictors thereof in 764 patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy: Results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 382–390, 2011.

D. D. Gladman, C. Antoni, P. Mease, D. O. Clegg, and O. Nash, “Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. ii14–ii17, 2005.

S. J. Bond, V. T. Farewell, C. T. Schentag, and D. D. Gladman, “Predictors for radiological damage in psoriatic arthritis: results from a single centre,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 370–376, 2007.

H. Marzo-Ortega, M. J. Green, A.-M. Keenan, R. J. Wakefield, S. Proudman, and P. Emery, “A randomized controlled trial of early intervention with intraarticular corticosteroids followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative treatment in early oligoarthritis,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 154–160, 2007.

M. Green, H. Marzo-Ortega, R. J. Wakefield, et al., “Predictors of outcome in patients with oligoarthritis: results of a protocol of intraarticular corticosteroids to all clinically active joints,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 44, pp. 1177–1183, 2001.