Journal of Amino AcidsVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 463183, 6 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/463183

Research Article

Crystal Structure of L-Histidinium 2-Nitrobenzoate

Subramanian Natarajan,¹ Kalimuthu Moovendaran,¹ Jeyaperumal Kalyana Sundar,² and Krishnan Ravikumar³

¹Department of Physics, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, India²Department of Physics, Sethu Institute of Technology, Pulloor, Kariapatti 626115, India³Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 007, India

Received 12 December 2011; Accepted 19 January 2012

Academic Editor: Andrei Malkov

Copyright © 2012 Subramanian Natarajan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A new nonlinear optical organic compound, namely, L-histidinium 2-nitrobenzoate (abbreviated as LH2NB (I); ([C₆H₁₀N₃O₂]⁺ [C₇H₄NO₄]⁻)), was synthesized. The molecular structure of LH2NB (I) was elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction technique. The second harmonic generation (SHG) efficiency of this compound is about two times that of the standard potassium dihydrogen phosphate crystals.

1. Introduction

Recently, considerable efforts are being made to design new noncentrosymmetric crystal structures by combining amino acids with various interesting organic and inorganic matrices to produce compounds for nonlinear optical (NLO) applications. A number of L-histidine compounds exhibiting the NLO behaviour, namely, L-histidine acetate [1], L-histidine chloride monohydrate [2], L-histidine tetrafluoroborate [3], L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate [4], L-histidine hydrofluoride dihydrate [5], L-histidine bromide [6], and L-histidinium trichloroacetate [7], were reported earlier. The crystal growth and characterization of L-histidinium trifluoroacetate and L-histidine nitrate were reported from this laboratory [8, 9], recently. In this paper, another new compound possessing the NLO property, namely, L-histidinium 2-nitrobenzoate [LH2NB, (I)] is reported. To our knowledge, (I) is the first reported compound of an amino acid with 2-nitrobenzoic acid. The details regarding the preparation, crystal structure, hydrogen bonding, and SHG efficiency of the title compound are discussed.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Synthesis and Crystallization of LH2NB

The starting compounds, namely, L-histidine (Loba Chemie, 99%) and 2-nitrobenzoic acid (Alfa Aesar, 95%) were used without further purification. L-histidine and 2-nitrobenzoic acid were mixed in the stoichiometric ratio, in 1 : 1 proportions and dissolved in distilled water. The resultant mixture was stirred continuously to obtain a homogeneous solution, filtered and kept undisturbed for crystallization to take place. Good quality single crystals of the title compound were obtained after about a week’s time. The chemical structure of the compound is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: The chemical structure of (I).

2.2. Crystal Structure Determination

Three-dimensional intensity data for a crystal of (I) were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer using graphite-monochromated MoKα radiation (0.71073 Å). The crystal structure was solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97 [10]. Full-matrix least-squares refinement and subsequent Fourier synthesis procedures were performed by using SHELXL-97 [10]. The hydrogen atoms attached to the C atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and refined using a riding model [C–H = 0.93–0.97 Å, Uiso = 1.2 Ueq (parent C atom)]. All the other hydrogen atoms participating in N–H bonding were located from difference Fourier map and restrained to a distance of 0.86 Å. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs (1130) were merged. The absolute configuration of L-histidinium 2-nitrobenzoate was known in advance. Successive refinements based on led to an value of 0.0254. The crystal data, structure solution, and refinement parameters are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: The crystal data, structure solution, and refinement parameters for (I).

Empirical formula
C₁₃H₁₄N₄O₆

Formula weight
322.28

Temperature
294 (2) K

Crystal system, space group
Monoclinic, P2₁

Unit cell dimensions
a = 5.147 (3) Å; b = 7.228 (5) Å c = 18.887 (1) Å; β = 92.72 (1)°

Volume
701.8 (8) Å³

Z, calculated density
2, 1.525 kg/m³

Absorption coefficient
0.123 mm⁻¹

F(000)
336

Crystal size
0.24 × 0.25 × 0.26 mm³

Theta range
2.16° to 24.99°

Limiting indices

Reflections collected/unique
6680/1347 (int) = 0.0176

Completeness to θ = 25°
99.9%

Data/restraints/parameters
1347/6/228

Goodness-of-fit on F ²
1.068

Final R indices I > 2σ (I)
,

R indices (all data)
,

Largest diff. peak and hole
0.166 and −0.141 e·Å⁻³

Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the structure of compound (I) reported in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication no. CCDC 857702. Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1 EZ, UK (fax: +44-(0)1223-336033 or email: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

2.3. Second Harmonic Generation (SHG) Efficiency

A preliminary study of the powder SHG was made with a laser beam of wavelength 1064 nm, using Kurtz and Perry technique [11]. The beam from a Q switched Nd: YAG laser had an energy of 3.9 mJ/pulse, pulse width of 8 ns, and the repetition rate being 10 Hz. The crystals were ground to a uniform particle size of about 125–150 μm and then packed in capillaries of uniform bore and exposed to the laser radiation. A powder of potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KDP), with the same particle size, was used as a reference. The output from the sample was monochromated to collect only the second harmonic ( nm), eliminating the fundamental, and the intensity was measured using a photomultiplier tube. It was found that the SHG conversion efficiency for the compound (I) is about two times that of the standard KDP crystals.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structure Description

The molecular structure of the compound (I) with atom numbering scheme is shown in Figure 2. The asymmetric part of the unit cell contains an L-histidinium cation and a nitrobenzoate anion. The histidine molecule exists as histidinium ion due to the protonation at the N atom of the imidazole ring. The 2-nitrobenzoic acid exists as nitrobenzoate since the proton gets transferred to the amino acid. Selected bond lengths, bond and torsion angles of (I) are listed in Table 2.

Table 2: Selected bond lengths (Å), bond and torsion angles (°) of (I).

C1–O1
1.224(2)
C6–N2
1.316 (3)

C1–O2
1.266 (2)
C6–N3
1.321 (3)

C1–C2
1.530 (2)
C7–O4
1.234 (2)

C2–N1
1.483 (2)
C7–O3
1.253 (2)

C2–C3
1.533 (2)
C7–C8
1.523 (3)

C3–C4
1.485 (3)
C13–N4
1.459 (3)

C4–C5
1.354 (3)
N4–O6
1.221 (3)

C4–N3
1.371 (3)
N4–O5
1.218 (3)

C5–N2
1.370 (3)

O1–C1–O2
126.5 (2)
C9–C8–C13
116.3 (2)

O1–C1–C2
118.0 (2)
C9–C8–C7
116.6 (2)

O2–C1–C2
115.5 (2)
C13–C8–C7
127.0 (2)

N1–C2–C1
110.7 (1)
C8–C9–C10
122.2 (2)

N1–C2–C3
107.8 (1)
C11–C10–C9
119.7 (2)

C1–C2–C3
110.2 (2)
C12–C11–C10
119.7 (2)

C4–C3–C2
112.2 (2)
C11–C12–C13
119.8 (2)

C5–C4–N3
106.3 (2)
C12–C13–C8
122.2 (2)

C5–C4–C3
132.3 (2)
C12–C13–N4
117.7 (2)

N3–C4–C3
121.4 (2)
C8–C13–N4
120.1 (2)

C4–C5–N2
107.3 (2)
C6–N2–C5
108.7 (2)

N2–C6–N3
108.7 (2)
C6–N3–C4
109.1 (2)

O4–C7–O3
126.9 (2)
O5–N4–O6
123.5 (3)

O4–C7–C8
116.9 (2)
O5–N4–C13
17.9 (2)

O3–C7–C8
115.9 (2)
O6–N4–C13
118.6 (2)

O1–C1–C2–N1
39.6 (2)
O4–C7–C8–C9
−75.8 (3)

C1–C2–C3–C4
−71.1 (2)
O3–C7–C8–C9
98.7 (2)

O3–C7–C8–C13
−78.5 (3)
O4–C7–C8–C13
107.0 (2)

C7–C8–C13–N4
−9.6 (3)
C12–C13–N4–O5
170.0 (2)

O1–C1–C2–C3
−79.6 (2)
C8–C13–N4–O5
−6.8 (3)

O2–C1–C2–C3
97.2 (2)
C12–C13–N4–O6
−8.8 (3)

C2–C3–C4–C5
104.4 (2)
C8–C13–N4–O6
174.5 (2)

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: The molecular structure of (I) showing the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level, using ORTEP-3. Hydrogen atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary size.

The amino and carboxylic groups of histidine are twisted by an angle (C1–C2–C3–C4) of −71.12 (2)° (Table 2), while this angle is −179.13(2)° in the structure of L-histidine [12]. This type of rotation is a common feature in histidine-carboxylic acid structures [1, 8, 13–15]. The bond angles in the amino and carboxyl groups are normal as observed in the structure of L-histidine [12]. The plane of the carboxylate group of histidinium is twisted from its normal position [12], which may be due to the presence of the intermolecular N–H⋯O bonds (Figure 3) from the nearby histidinium ions.

Figure 3: The packing diagram of LH2NB viewed down the a-axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

The benzene ring of nitrobenzoate is nearly planar with the r.m.s. deviation being only 0.010 (2) Å. The nitro and carboxylate groups of the nitrobenzoate are twisted with respect to the planar benzene ring, as evident from the values of the torsion angles [16]. The planar six membered and five membered rings in nitrobenzoate and histidinium, respectively, are nearly perpendicular [82.99°] to each other. Excepting O6, all the other oxygen atoms act as acceptors (Figure 3) in the formation of N–H⋯O and C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 3).

Table 3: Hydrogen-bond geometry of (I) (Å, °).

D–H···A
D–H
H⋯A
D⋯A
<(D–H⋯A)

N1–H1N⋯O2i
0.89
1.97
2.847 (2)
166 (2)

N1–H2N⋯O2ii
0.90
1.84
2.738 (2)
174 (2)

N1–H3N⋯O3iii
0.91
2.18
3.020 (2)
154 (2)

N2–H4N⋯O3iv
0.87
1.81
2.685 (3)
174 (3)

N3–H5N⋯O4iii
0.85
1.88
2.712 (3)
164 (3)

N3–H5N⋯O5v
0.85
2.59
3.019 (3)
112 (2)

C5–H5 ⋯O1vi
0.93
2.41
3.052 (2)
126 (2)

C6–H6⋯O5v
0.93
2.36
2.931 (3)
119 (2)

i, , ; ii, , ; iii, , ; iv, , ; v, , ; vi, , .

3.2. Structural Features Responsible for the Origin of SHG in the Compound (I)

The level of SHG response of a material is inherently dependent upon its structural attributes. On a molecular scale, the extent of charge transfer (CT) across the NLO chromophore determines the level of SHG output; the greater the CT, the larger the SHG output. The presence of intermolecular interactions, such as hydrogen bonds, can extend this level of CT into the supramolecular realm, owing to their electrostatic and directed nature, thereby enhancing the SHG response [17, 18]. In LH2NB, the network of N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds running along the a-axis links the cationic histidinium ions (Figure 4(a)). Further, the benzoates are interconnected by N–H⋯O hydrogen bond to the histidinium molecule. The interconnected molecules of LH2NB are stacked as arrays along the a-axis (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) and further stabilized by other N–H⋯O bonds and weak interactions.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: (a) The histidinium is stacked as arrays along the a-axis. (b) The 2-nitrobenzoate is stacked as arrays along the a-axis.

The interplanar distances between the two six membered rings (in 2-nitrobenzoates) and the two five membered rings (in the amino acids) have the values of 3.480 Å and 3.307 Å, respectively, which fall in the category of π-π stacking. Such parallel and close stacking is very favorable for the promotion of CT through the lattice. The large SHG efficiency (about two times that of the standard KDP) of the compound (I) possibly arises due to (i) the large number of hydrogen bonds and (ii) the close stacking of histidinium cations and 2-nitrobenzozte anions, in the structure [19].

4. Conclusions

The crystals of a new NLO material from the amino acid family, namely, L-histidinium 2-nitrobenzoate (LH2NB), were grown using slow evaporation technique. The crystal structure of LH2NB was elucidated using single crystal X-ray diffraction methods. The proton from 2-nitrobenzoic acid is transferred to the L-histidine, forming L-histidinium 2-nitrobenzoate. The SHG efficiency of this material was measured using Kurtz and Perry method and found to be about two times that of the standard KDP crystals. The large number of hydrogen bonds, the π-π stacking of L-histidinium anions and 2-nitrobenzoate cations and the presence of strong electron acceptors and electron donors are, in part, the reasons for the large SHG efficiency possessed by this material.

Acknowledgments

S. Natarajan thanks the CSIR for the funding provided under the Emeritus Scientist Scheme. K. Moovendaran thanks the CSIR for the SRF.

References

J. Madhavan, S. Aruna, A. Anuradha et al., “Growth and characterization of a new nonlinear optical l-histidine acetate single crystals,” Optical Materials, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1211–1216, 2007.

A. B. Ahmed, H. Feki, Y. Abid, H. Boughzala, and C. Minot, “Crystal studies, vibrational spectra and non-linear optical properties of l-histidine chloride monohydrate,” Spectrochimica Acta A, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 293–298, 2010.

M. D. Aggarwal, J. Choi, W. S. Wang et al., “Solution growth of a novel nonlinear optical material: L-histidine tetrafluoroborate,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 179–182, 1999.

J. Madhavan, S. Aruna, P. C. Thomas, M. Vimalan, S. A. Rajasekar, and P. Sagayaraj, “Growth and characterization of L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate single crystals,” Crystal Research and Technology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–64, 2007.

J. Madhavan, S. Aruna, K. Prabha et al., “Growth and characterization of a novel NLO crystal l-histidine hydrofluoride dihydrate (LHHF),” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 409–414, 2006.

A. B. Ahmed, H. Feki, Y. Abid, H. Boughzala, and A. Mlayah, “Structural, vibrational and theoretical studies of l-histidine bromide,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 888, no. 1-3, pp. 180–186, 2008.

S. Gokul Raj, G. Ramesh Kumar, R. Mohan, B. Varghese, and R. Jayavel, “Crystal structure of single crystals of nonlinear optical l-histidinium trichloroacetate,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 825, no. 1–3, pp. 158–164, 2006.

S. A. Martin Britto Dhas, J. Suresh, G. Bhagavannarayana, and S. Natarajan, “Growth and characterization of a new organic non-linear optical (NLO) material: L-histidinium trifluoroacetate,” The Open Crystallography Journal, vol. 1, pp. 46–50, 2008.

S. A. Martin Britto Dhas and S. Natarajan, “Growth and characterization of two new NLO materials from the amino acid family: l-Histidine nitrate and l-Cysteine tartrate monohydrate,” Optics Communications, vol. 281, no. 3, pp. 457–462, 2008.

G. M. Sheldrick, “A short history of SHELX,” Acta Crystallographica Section A, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 112–122, 2008.

S. K. Kurtz and T. T. Perry, “A powder technique for the evaluation of nonlinear optical materials,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 3798–3813, 1968.

M. T. Averbuch- Pouchot, “Crystal structure of l-histidinium phosphite and a structure reinvestigation of the monoclinic form of L-histidine,” Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, vol. 207, pp. 111–120, 1993.

J. V. Pratap, R. Ravishankar, and M. Vijayan, “X-ray studies on crystalline complexes involving amino acids and peptides. XXXV. Invariance and variability in amino acid aggregation in the complexes of maleic acid with L-histidine and L-lysine,” Acta Crystallographica Section B, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 690–696, 2000.

N. T. Saraswathi and M. Vijayan, “X-ray studies on crystalline complexes involving amino acids and peptides. XXXIX. Crystal structures of malonic acid complexes of DL- and L-histidine. Preservation of aggregation pattern on reversal of chirality,” Acta Crystallographica Section B, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 734–739, 2002.

M. M. Prabu, H. G. Nagendra, S. Suresh, and M. Vijayan, “X-ray studies on crystalline complexes involving amino acids and peptides XXXI. Effect of chirality on ionization state, stoichiometry and aggregation in the complexes of oxalic acid with L-and DL-histidine,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 387–392, 1996.

G. Portalone, “A redetermination of 2-nitro-benzoic acid,” Acta Crystallographica Section E, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. o954–o955, 2009.

J. L. Oudar, “Optical nonlinearities of conjugated molecules. Stilbene derivatives and highly polar aromatic compounds,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 446–457, 1977.

J. Zyss and J. L. Oudar, “Relations between microscopic and macroscopic lowest-order optical nonlinearities of molecular crystals with one- or two-dimensional units,” Physical Review A, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2028–2048, 1982.

J. M. Cole, J. A. K. Howard, and G. J. McIntyre, “Influence of hydrogen bonding on the second harmonic generation effect: neutron diffraction study of 4-nitro-4′-methylbenzylidene aniline,” Acta Crystallographica Section B, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 410–414, 2001.