Blow-up criteria of smooth solutions for the 3D micropolar fluid equations are investigated. Logarithmically improved blow-up criteria are established in the Morrey-Campanto space.
1. Introduction
This paper concerns the initial value problem for the micropolar fluid equations in ℝ3∂tu-(μ+χ)Δu+u⋅∇u+∇p-χ∇×w=0,∂tw-γΔw-κ∇∇⋅w+2χw+u⋅∇w-χ∇×u=0,∇⋅u=0
with the initial valuet=0:u=u0(x),w=w0(x),
where u(t,x), w(t,x), and p(t,x) stand for the velocity field, microrotation field, and the scalar pressure, respectively. And ν>0 is the Newtonian kinetic viscosity, κ>0 is the dynamics micro-rotation viscosity, and α,β,γ>0 are the angular viscosity (see, i.e., Lukaszewicz [1]).
The micropolar fluid equations were first proposed by Eringen [2]. It is a type of fluids which exhibits the micro-rotational effects and micro-rotational inertia and can be viewed as a non-Newtonian fluid. Physically, it may represent adequately the fluids consisting of bar-like elements. Certain anisotropic fluids, for example, liquid crystals that are made up of dumbbell molecules, are of the same type. For more background, we refer to [1] and references therein. Besides their physical applications, the micropolar fluid equations are also mathematically significant. Fundamental mathematical issues such as the global regularity of their solutions have generated extensive research, and many interesting results have been obtained (see [3–8]). Regularity criterion of weak solutions to (1.1) and (1.2) in terms of the pressure was obtained (see [4]). Gala [5] established a Serrin-type regularity criterion for the weak solutions to (1.1) and (1.2) in Morrey-Campanato space. Wang and Chen [7] established the regularity criteria of weak solutions to (1.1) and (1.2) via the derivative of the velocity in one direction. A new logarithmically improved blow-up criterion of smooth solutions to (1.1) and (1.2) in an appropriate homogeneous Besov space is established by Wang and Yuan [8].
If κ=0 and w=0, then (1.1) reduces to be the Navier-Stokes equations. Besides its physical applications, the Navier-Stokes equations are also mathematically significant. In the last century, Leray [9] and Hopf [10] constructed weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. The solution is called the Leray-Hopf weak solution. Later on, much effort has been devoted to establish the global existence and uniqueness of smooth solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations. Different criteria for regularity of the weak solutions have been proposed and many interesting results are established (see [11–26]). Regularity criteria of weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in Morrey space were obtained in [13, 21].
The main aim of this paper is to establish two logarithmically blow-up criteria of smooth solution to (1.1), (1.2). Our results state as follows.
Theorem 1.1.
Let u0,w0∈Hm(ℝ3)(m≥3) with ∇·u0=0. Assume that (u,w) is a smooth solution to (1.1) and (1.2) on [0, T). If u satisfies
∫0T‖u(t)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)1+ln(e+‖u(t)‖L∞)dt<∞,0<r<1,
then the solution (u,w) can be extended beyond t=T.
We have the following corollary immediately.
Corollary 1.2.
Let u0,w0∈Hm(ℝ3)(m≥3) with ∇·u0=0. Assume that (u,w) is a smooth solution to (1.1) and (1.2) on [0, T). Suppose that T is the maximal existence time, then
∫0T‖u(t)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)1+ln(e+‖u(t)‖L∞)dt=∞,0<r<1.
Theorem 1.3.
Let u0,w0∈Hm(ℝ3)(m≥3) with ∇·u0=0. Assume that (u,w) is a smooth solution to (1.1) and (1.2) on [0, T). If u satisfies
∫0T‖∇u(t)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u(t)‖L∞)dt<∞,0<r<1,
then the solution (u,w) can be extended beyond t=T.
One has the following corollary immediately.
Corollary 1.4.
Let u0,w0∈Hm(ℝ3)(m≥3) with ∇·u0=0. Assume that (u,w) is a smooth solution to (1.1) and (1.2) on [0, T). Suppose that T is the maximal existence time, then
∫0T‖∇u(t)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u(t)‖L∞)dt=∞,0<r<1.
The paper is organized as follows. We first state some important inequalities in Section 2, which play an important role in the proof of our main result. Then, we prove the main result in Section 3 and Section 4, respectively.
2. Preliminaries
Firstly, we recall the definition and some properties of the space that we are going to use. The space plays an important role in studying the regularity of solutions to nonlinear differential equations.
Definition 2.1.
For 1<p≤q≤+∞, the Morrey-Campanato space Ṁp,q is defined by
Ṁp,q={f∈Llocp(R3)∣‖f‖Ṁp,q=supx∈R3supR>0R3/q-3/p‖f‖Lp(B(x,R))<∞},
where B(x,R) denotes the ball of center x with radius R.
It is easy to verify that Ṁp,q is a Banach space under the norm ∥·∥Ṁp,q. Furthermore, it is easy to check the following:
‖f(λ⋅)‖Ṁp,q=λ-3/q‖f‖Ṁp,q,λ>0.
Morrey-Campanato spaces can be seen as a complement to Lp spaces. In fact, for p≤q, one has
Lq=Ṁq,q⊂Ṁp,q.
one has the following comparison between Lorentz spaces and Morrey-Campanato spaces: for p≥2,
L3/r(R3)⊂L3/r,∞(R3)⊂Ṁp,3/r(R3),
where Lp,∞ denotes the usual Lorentz (weak Lp) space.
In the proof of our main result, we need the following lemma which was given in [27].
Lemma 2.2.
For 0≤r<3/2, the space Żr is defined as the space of f(x)∈Lloc2(ℝ3) such that
‖f‖Żr=sup‖g‖Ḃ2,1r≤1‖fg‖L2<∞.
Then f∈Ṁ2,3/r if and only if f∈Żr with equivalence of norms. And the fact that
L2⋂Ḣ1⊂Ḃ2,1r⊂Ḣr,0<r<1,
one has
Ẋr⊂Ṁ2,3/r,
where Ẋr denotes the pointwise multiplier space from Ḣr to L2.
We need the following lemma that is basically established in [28]. For completeness, the proof will be also sketched here.
Lemma 2.3.
For 0<r<1, the inequality
‖f‖Ḃ2,1r≤C‖f‖L21-r‖∇f‖L2r
holds, where C is a positive constant that depends on r.
Proof.
It follows from the definition of Besov spaces that
‖f‖Ḃ2,1r=∑i∈Z2ir‖Δif‖L2≤∑i≤j2ir‖Δif‖L2+∑i>j2i(r-1)2i‖Δif‖L2≤(∑i≤j22ir)1/2(∑i≤j‖Δif‖L22)1/2+(∑i≤j22i(r-1))1/2(∑i>j22i‖Δif‖L22)1/2≤C(2jr‖f‖L2+2j(r-1)‖f‖Ḣ1)=C(2jrA-r+2j(r-1)A1-r)‖f‖L21-r‖f‖Ḣ1r,
where A=(∥f∥Ḣ1)/(∥f∥L2). Choosing j such that 1/2≤2jrA-r≤1, from (2.9) we get
‖f‖Ḃ2,1r≤(1+2j(r-1)A1-r)‖f‖L21-r‖f‖Ḣ1r≤C(1+(12)-1/r)‖f‖L21-r‖∇f‖L2r.
Therefore, we have completed the proof of Lemma 2.3.
The following Lemma comes from [29].
Lemma 2.4.
Assume that 1<p<∞. For f,g∈Wm,p, and 1<q≤∞, 1<r<∞, one has
‖∇α(fg)-f∇αg‖Lp≤C(‖∇f‖Lq1‖∇α-1g‖Lr1+‖g‖Lq2‖∇αf‖Lr2),
where 1≤α≤m and 1/p=1/q1+1/r1=1/q2+1/r2.
In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we need the following interpolation inequalities in three space dimensions.
Lemma 2.5.
In three space dimensions, the following inequalities
‖∇f‖L4≤C‖f‖L21/8‖∇2f‖L27/8‖f‖L4≤C‖f‖L23/4‖∇3f‖L21/4‖∇2f‖L4≤C‖f‖L21/12‖∇3f‖L211/12‖∇2f‖L2≤C‖f‖L21/3‖∇3f‖L22/3
hold.
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1Proof.
Multiplying the first equation of (1.1) by u and integrating with respect to x over ℝ3, using integration by parts, we obtain
12ddt‖u(t)‖L22+(μ+χ)‖∇u(t)‖L22=χ∫R3(∇×w)⋅udx
Similarly, we get
12ddt‖w(t)‖L22+γ‖∇w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖w‖L22=χ∫R3(∇×u)⋅wdx.
Summing up (3.1) and (3.2), we deduce thats
12ddt(‖u(t)‖L22+‖w(t)‖L22)+(μ+χ)‖∇u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖w‖L22=χ∫R3(∇×w)⋅udx+χ∫R3(∇×u)⋅wdx.
Using integration by parts and Cauchy’s inequality, we obtain
χ∫R3(∇×w)⋅udx+χ∫R3(∇×u)⋅wdx≤χ‖∇u‖L22+χ‖w‖L22.
Combining (3.3) and (3.4) yields
12ddt(‖u(t)‖L22+‖w(t)‖L22)+μ‖∇u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇⋅w‖L22+χ‖w‖L22≤0.
Integrating with respect to t, we have
‖u(t)‖L22+‖w(t)‖L22+2∫0t(μ‖∇u(τ)‖L22+γ‖∇w(τ)‖L22)dτ+2κ∫0t‖∇⋅w(τ)‖L22dτ+2χ∫0t‖w(τ)‖L22dτ≤‖u0‖L22+‖w0‖L22.
Taking ∇ to the first equation of (1.1), then multiplying the resulting equation by ∇u and using integration by parts, we obtain
12ddt‖∇u(t)‖L22+(μ+χ)‖∇2u(t)‖L22=-∫R3∇(u⋅∇u)∇udx+χ∫R3∇(∇×w)∇udx.
Similarly, we get
12ddt‖∇w(t)‖L22+γ‖∇2w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇⋅∇w‖L22+2χ‖∇w‖L22=-∫R3∇(u⋅∇w)⋅∇wdx+χ∫R3∇(∇×u)⋅∇wdx.
Combining (3.7) and (3.8) yields
12ddt(‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22)+(μ+χ)‖∇2u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇2w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖∇w‖L22=-∫R3∇(u⋅∇u)∇udx+χ∫R3∇(∇×w)∇udx-∫R3∇(u⋅∇w)∇wdx+χ∫R3∇(∇×u)∇wdx.
Using integration by parts and Cauchy’s inequality, we obtain
χ∫R3∇(∇×w)⋅∇udx+χ∫R3∇(∇×u)⋅∇wdx≤χ‖∇2u‖L22+χ‖∇w‖L22.
Using Hölder’s inequality, (2.8), and Young’s inequality, we obtain
-∫R3∇(u⋅∇u)∇udx≤‖∇u‖L2‖∇u∇u‖L2≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇u‖Ḃ2,1r‖∇u‖L2≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇u‖Ḃ2,1r2-r‖∇2u‖L2r≤μ2‖∇2u(t)‖L22+C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)‖∇u‖L22.
Similarly, we have the following estimate:
-∫R3∇(u⋅∇w)∇wdx≤‖∇w‖L2‖∇u∇w‖L2≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇w‖Ḃ2,1r‖∇w‖L2≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇w‖Ḃ2,1r2-r‖∇2w‖L2r≤γ2‖∇2w(t)‖L22+C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)‖∇w‖L22.
Combining (3.9)-(3.12) yields
ddt(‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22)+μ‖∇2u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇2w‖L22+κ‖∇∇⋅w‖L22+χ‖∇w‖L22≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)(‖∇u‖L22+‖∇w‖L22)≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞)(‖∇u‖L22+‖∇w‖L22)(1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞))≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞)(‖∇u‖L22+‖∇w‖L22)(1+ln(e+‖∇3u‖L2+‖∇3w‖L2)),
where we have used
H2(R3)↪L∞(R3).
For any T0≤t≤T, we set
ϑ(t)=supT0≤τ≤t(‖∇3u(τ)‖L22+‖∇3w(τ)‖L22).
Thus, from (3.13), we have
ddt(‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22)+μ‖∇2u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇2w‖L22+κ‖∇∇⋅w‖L22+χ‖∇w‖L22≤C‖∇u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞)(‖∇u‖L22+‖∇w‖L22)(1+ln(e+ϑ(t))),∀T0≤t<T.
It follows from (3.8) and Gronwall’s inequality that
‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22≤(‖∇u(T0)‖L22+‖∇w(T0)‖L22)exp{C(1+ln(e+ϑ(t)))∫T0t‖∇u(τ)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞)dτ}≤C0exp{Cɛ[1+ln(e+ϑ(t))]}≤C0exp{2Cɛ[ln(e+ϑ(t))]}≤C0(e+ϑ(t))2Cɛ,
provided that
∫T0t‖∇u(τ)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖∇u‖L∞)dτ<ɛ≪1,
where C0=∥∇u(T0)∥L22+∥∇w(T0)∥L22.
Applying ∇m to the first equation of (1.1), then multiplying the resulting equation by ∇mu and using integration by parts, we have
12ddt‖∇mu(t)‖L22+(μ+χ)‖∇m+1u(t)‖L22=-∫R3∇m(u⋅∇u)∇mudx+χ∫R3∇m(∇×w)∇mudx.
Likewise, from the second equation of (1.1), we obtain
12ddt‖∇mw(t)‖L22+γ‖∇m+1w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇m∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖∇mw(t)‖L22=-∫R3∇m(u⋅∇w)∇mwdx+χ∫R3∇m(∇×u)∇mwdx.
Using ∇·u=0 and (3.19) and (3.20), we have
12ddt(‖∇mu(t)‖L22+‖∇mw(t)‖L22)+(μ+χ)‖∇m+1u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇m+1w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇m∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖∇mw(t)‖L22=-∫R3[∇m(u⋅∇u)-u⋅∇∇mu]∇mudx+χ∫R3∇m(∇×w)∇mudx-∫R3[∇m(u⋅∇w)-u⋅∇∇mw]∇mwdx+χ∫R3∇m(∇×u)∇mwdx.
In what follows, for simplicity, we will set m=3.
By Hölder’s inequality, (2.11), (2.12), and Young’s inequality, we obtain
-∫R3[∇3(u⋅∇u)-u⋅∇∇3u]∇3udx≤‖∇3(u⋅∇u)-u⋅∇∇3u‖L2‖∇3u‖L2≤C‖∇u‖L4‖∇3u‖L4‖∇3u‖L2≤C‖∇u‖L23/4‖∇4u‖L21/4‖∇u‖L21/12‖∇4u‖L211/12‖∇u‖L21/3‖∇4u‖L22/3≤C‖∇u‖L27/6‖∇4u‖L211/6≤μ4‖∇4u‖L22+C‖∇u‖L214≤μ4‖∇4u‖L22+C(e+ϑ(t))14Cɛ,-∫R3[∇3(u⋅∇w)-u⋅∇∇3w]∇3wdx≤‖∇3(u⋅∇w)-u⋅∇∇3w‖L2‖∇3w‖L2≤C‖∇u‖L4‖∇3w‖L4‖∇3w‖L2+‖∇w‖L4‖∇3u‖L4‖∇3w‖L2≤C‖∇u‖L23/4‖∇4u‖L21/4‖∇w‖L21/12‖∇4w‖L211/12‖∇w‖L21/3‖∇4w‖L22/3+C‖∇w‖L23/4‖∇4w‖L21/4‖∇u‖L21/12‖∇4u‖L211/12‖∇w‖L21/3‖∇4w‖L22/3≤μ4‖∇4u‖L22+γ2‖∇4w‖L22+C‖∇u‖L29‖∇w‖L25+C‖∇u‖L2‖∇w‖L213≤μ4‖∇4u‖L22+γ2‖∇4w‖L22+C(e+ϑ(t))14Cɛ.
It follows from integration by parts and Cauchy’s inequality that
χ∫R3∇3(∇×w)∇3udx+χ∫R3∇3(∇×u)∇3wdx≤χ‖∇4u(t)‖L22+χ‖∇3w(t)‖L22.
Combining (3.21)-(3.24) yields
12ddt(‖∇mu(t)‖L22+‖∇mw(t)‖L22)+(μ+χ)‖∇m+1u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇m+1w(t)‖L22+κ‖∇m∇⋅w‖L22+2χ‖∇mw(t)‖L22≤C(e+ϑ(t))14Cɛ,∀T0≤t<T.
Taking ɛ small enough yields
ddt(‖∇3u‖L22+‖∇3w‖L22)≤C(e+ϑ(t)),T0≤t<T,
for all T0≤t<T.
Integrating (3.26) with respect to time from T0 to τ, we have
e+‖∇3u(τ)‖L22+‖∇3w(τ)‖L22≤e+‖∇3u(T0)‖L22+‖∇3w(T0)‖L22+C2∫T0τ(e+ϑ(s))ds.
Owing to (3.27), we get
e+ϑ(t)≤e+‖∇3u(T0)‖L22+‖∇3w(T0)‖L22+C2∫T0t(e+ϑ(τ))dτ
For all T0≤t<T, with help of Gronwall inequality and (3.28), we have
e+‖∇3u(t)‖L22+‖∇3w(t)‖L22≤C,
where C depends on ∥∇u(T0)∥L22+∥∇w(T0)∥L22. From (3.29) and (3.5), we know that (u,w)∈L∞(0,T;H3(ℝ3)). Thus, (u,w) can be extended smoothly beyond t=T. We have completed the proof of Theorem 1.1.
4. Proof of Theorem 1.3
We start to estimate every term on the right of (3.9). Using integration by parts, Hölder inequality, (2.8) and Young inequality, we obtain-∫R3∇(u⋅∇u)∇udx≤‖∇2u‖L2‖u∇u‖L2≤C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇u‖Ḃ2,1r‖∇2u‖L2≤C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇u‖Ḃ2,1r1-r‖∇2u‖L21+r≤μ2‖∇2u(t)‖L22+C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)‖∇u‖L22.
Similarly, we have the following estimate-∫R3∇(u⋅∇w)∇wdx≤‖∇2w‖L2‖u∇w‖L2≤C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇w‖Ḃ2,1r‖∇2w‖L2≤C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r‖∇w‖Ḃ2,1r1-r‖∇2w‖L21+r≤γ2‖∇2w(t)‖L22+C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)‖∇w‖L22.
Thus from (3.9), (3.10), (4.1), and (4.2), we obtainddt(‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22)+μ‖∇2u(t)‖L22+γ‖∇2w‖L22+κ‖∇∇⋅w‖L22+χ‖∇w‖L22≤C‖u‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)1+ln(e+‖u‖L∞)(‖∇u‖L22+‖∇w‖L22)(1+ln(e+ϑ(t))),∀T0≤t<T.
It follows from (4.3) and Gronwall’s inequality that‖∇u(t)‖L22+‖∇w(t)‖L22≤(‖∇u(T0)‖L22+‖∇w(T0)‖L22)exp{C(1+ln(e+ϑ(t)))∫T0t‖u(τ)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(1-r)1+ln(e+‖u‖L∞)dτ}≤C0exp{Cɛ[1+ln(e+ϑ(t))]}≤C0exp{2Cɛ[ln(e+ϑ(t))]}≤C0(e+ϑ(t))2Cɛ,
provided that∫T0t‖u(τ)‖Ṁ2,3/r2/(2-r)1+ln(e+‖u‖L∞)dτ<ɛ≪1,
where C0=∥∇u(T0)∥L22+∥∇w(T0)∥L22.
From (4.4), Hm estimate for Theorem 1.3 is same as that for Theorem 1.1. Thus, Theorem 1.3 is proved.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the NNSF of China (Grant no. 11101144) and Research Initiation Project for High-level Talents (201031) of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power.
LukaszewiczG.1999Boston, Mass, USABirkhäuserxvi+253Theory and Applications, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology1711268EringenA. C.Theory of micropolar fluids1966161180204005DongB.-Q.ChenZ.-M.Regularity criteria of weak solutions to the three-dimensional micropolar flows20095010103525-1103525-1310.1063/1.32458622572698DongB.-Q.JiaY.ChenZ.-M.Pressure regularity criteria of the three-dimensional micropolar fluid flows201134559560610.1002/mma.13832814514GalaS.On regularity criteria for the three-dimensional micropolar fluid equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space20111242142215010.1016/j.nonrwa.2010.12.0282801007Ortega-TorresE.Rojas-MedarM.On the regularity for solutions of the micropolar fluid equations200912227372582828WangY.-Z.ChenZ.Regularity criterion for weak solution to the 3D micropolar fluid equations201120111245654710.1155/2011/4565472822400WangY.-Z.YuanH.A logarithmically improved blow-up criterion for smooth solutions to the 3D micropolar fluid equations20121341904191210.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.12.018LerayJ.Sur le mouvement d'un liquide visqueux emplissant l'espace193463118324810.1007/BF025473541555394HopfE.Über die Anfangswertaufgabe für die hydrodynamischen Grundgleichungen195142132310050423ChaeD.On the regularity conditions for the Navier-Stokes and related equations200723137138410.4171/RMI/4982351138ChanC. H.VasseurA.Log improvement of the Prodi-Serrin criteria for Navier-Stokes equations20071421972122437103ChenZ.-M.PriceW. G.Morrey space techniques applied to the interior regularity problem of the Navier-Stokes equations20011461453147210.1088/0951-7715/14/6/3031867087FanJ.OzawaT.Regularity criterion for weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in terms of the gradient of the pressure2008641267810.1155/2008/4126782460836FanJ.JiangS.NakamuraG.ZhouY.Logarithmically improved regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes and MHD equations201113455757110.1007/s00021-010-0039-52847281HeC.New sufficient conditions for regularity of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations20021225355481943979KozonoH.OgawaT.TaniuchiY.The critical Sobolev inequalities in Besov spaces and regularity criterion to some semi-linear evolution equations2002242225127810.1007/s0020901003321980623KozonoH.YatsuN.Extension criterion via two-components of vorticity on strong solutions to the 3D Navier-Stokes equations20042461-2556810.1007/s00209-003-0576-12031444KukavicaI.ZianeM.One component regularity for the Navier-Stokes equations200619245346910.1088/0951-7715/19/2/0122199398KukavicaI.ZianeM.Navier-Stokes equations with regularity in one direction2007486065203-1065203-1010.1063/1.23959192337002KukavicaI.Regularity for the Navier-Stokes equations with a solution in a Morrey space20085762843286010.1512/iumj.2008.57.36282483004SerrinJ.On the interior regularity of weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations196291871950136885ZhangZ.ChenQ.Regularity criterion via two components of vorticity on weak solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations in ℝ32005216247048110.1016/j.jde.2005.06.0012165305ZhouY.GalaS.Logarithmically improved regularity criteria for the Navier-Stokes equations in multiplier spaces2009356249850110.1016/j.jmaa.2009.03.0382524284ZhouY.PokornýM.On a regularity criterion for the Navier-Stokes equations involving gradient of one velocity component20095012123514-1123514-1110.1063/1.32685892582610ZhouY.PokornýM.On the regularity of the solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations via one velocity component20102351097110710.1088/0951-7715/23/5/0042630092Lemarié-RieussetP. G.The Navier-Stokes equations in the critical Morrey-Campanato space200723389793010.4171/RMI/5182414497ZhouY.GalaS.A new regularity criterion for weak solutions to the viscous MHD equations in terms of the vorticity field2010729-103643364810.1016/j.na.2009.12.0452606809KatoT.PonceG.Commutator estimates and the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations198841789190710.1002/cpa.3160410704951744