An average linear finite difference scheme for the numerical solution of the initial-boundary value problem of Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation is proposed. The existence, uniqueness, and conservation for energy of the difference solution are proved by the discrete energy norm method. It is shown that the finite difference scheme is 2nd-order convergent and unconditionally stable. Numerical experiments verify that the theoretical results are right and the numerical method is efficient and reliable.
1. Introduction
KdV equation has been used in very wide applications and undergone research which can be used to describe wave propagation and spread interaction as follows [1–4]:
(1)ut+uux+uxxx=0.
In the study of the dynamics of dense discrete systems, the case of wave-wave and wave-wall interactions cannot be described using the well-known KdV equation. To overcome this shortcoming of the KdV equation, Rosenau [5, 6] proposed the so-called Rosenau equation:
(2)ut+ux+uux+uxxxxt=0.
The existence and the uniqueness of the solution for (2) were proved by Park [7]. But it is difficult to find the analytical solution for (2). Since then, much work has been done on the numerical method for (2) ([8–13] and also the references therein). On the other hand, for the further consideration of the nonlinear wave, the viscous term uxxx needs to be included [14]:
(3)ut+ux+uxxx+uxxxxt+uux=0.
This equation is usually called the Rosenau-KdV equation. Zuo [14] discussed the solitary wave solutions and periodic solutions for Rosenau-KdV equation. In [15], a conservative linear finite difference scheme for the numerical solution for an initial-boundary value problem of Rosenau-KdV equation is considered. In this paper, we consider the following Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation:
(4)ut+ux+uxxx+uxxxxt+(up)x=0,
where p≥2 is an integer. When p=2, (4) is called usual Rosenau-KdV (3).
In [16, 17], authors discussed the solitary solutions for the Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation with usual solitary ansatz method. The authors also gave the two invariants for the Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation. In particular, in [17], the authors not only studied the two types of soliton solution, one is solitary wave solution and the other is singular soliton. Furthermore, they also used the perturbation theory and the semivariation principle to study the perturbed Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation analytically. In [18], only ansatz method was applied to obtain the topological soliton solution or the shock solution of this equation. Three methods, ansatz method, G′/G-expansion method, and the exp-function method, were applied to extract a few more solutions to this equation in [19].
As we all know, most of the time, we need to think of the numerical solution of nonlinear evolution equations. Many scholars in this field have a good work. In [20], the authors simulate the numerical solution of the Klein-Gordon equation by using the spectral method where rational Chebyshev functions are used as basic functions. In [21], the authors study the numerical solution of the two-dimensional Sine-Gordon equation (SGE) using a split-step Chebyshev Spectral Method. In [22], the authors develop a Galerkin spectral technique for computing localized solutions of equation with Sixth-Order Generalized Boussinesq Equation (6GBE). In [15], the authors propose a conservative three-level linear finite difference scheme with second-order convergent for the numerical solution of the initial-boundary value problem of Rosenau-KdV equation.
But the numerical method of the initial-boundary value problem of Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation has not been studied till now. In this paper, we propose an average three-level linear finite difference scheme for (4) with the boundary conditions
(5)u(Xl,t)=u(Xr,t)=0,ux(Xl,t)=ux(Xr,t)=0,uxx(Xl,t)=uxx(Xr,t)=0,t∈[0,T],
and initial condition
(6)u(x,0)=u0(x).
The initial-boundary value problem (3)–(5) possesses the following conservative properties [16, 17]:
(7)M(t)=∫XlXrudx=∫XlXru0dx=M(0),(8)E(t)=∫XlXr(u2+uxx2)dx=∥u∥L22+∥uxx∥L22=E(0).
When Xl≪0, Xr≫0, the initial-boundary value problem (4)–(6) and the Cauchy problem (4) are consistent, so the boundary conditions (5) are reasonable.
Compared to the implicit C-N nonlinear scheme, the scheme in this paper is linear and it can reduce computing cost. We will prove existence, uniqueness, and stability of the numerical solution. The studies show that the convergence of the scheme is 2nd-order rate. The most important point is that the scheme is conservative for energy.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we propose a three-level average implicit linear finite difference scheme for Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation and discuss the discrete conservative properties for energy. In Section 3, we prove that the scheme is uniquely solvable. In Section 4, we prove that the finite difference scheme is 2nd-order convergent and unconditionally stable. In Section 5, we give some numerical simulation to verify our theoretical analysis. Finally, in Section 6, we get our conclusion.
2. Difference Scheme and Some Properties of Its Solution
In this section, we first give some notation which will be used in this paper and propose an average linear difference scheme for the problem of (4)–(6).
As usual, denote xj=Xl+jh, tn=nτ, 0≤j≤J, 0≤n≤N, where h=(Xr-Xl)/J and let τ be the uniform, the spatial, and the temporal step size, respectively. Let ujn≈u(jh,nτ), Zh0={u=(uj)∣u-1=u0=uJ=uJ+1=0,-1≤j≤J+1}. Throughout this paper, we will denote C as a generic constant independent of h and τ that varies in the context.
We define the difference operators, inner product, and norms that will be used in this paper as follows:
(9)(ujn)x=uj+1n-ujnh,(ujn)x¯=ujn-uj-1nh,(ujn)x^=uj+1n-uj-1n2h,(ujn)t=ujn+1-ujnτ,(ujn)t^=ujn+1-ujn-12τ,(ujn)xx¯=uj+1n-2ujn+uj-1nh2,u-jn=ujn+1+ujn-12,ujn+(1/2)=ujn+1+ujn2,〈un,vn〉=h∑j=1J-1ujnvjn,∥un∥2=〈un,un〉,∥un∥∞=max0≤j≤J-1|ujn|.
Since (up)x=(p/(p+1))[up-1ux+(up)x], the following finite difference scheme for the problem (4)–(6) is considered:
(10)(ujn)t^+(u-jn)x^+(u-jn)xx¯x^+(ujn)xxx¯x¯t^+pp+1{(ujn)p-1(u-jn)x^+[(ujn)p-1u-jn]x^}=0,(11)uj0=u0(xj),1≤j≤J-1,(12)u0n=uJn=0,(u0n)x^=(uJn)x^=0,(u0n)xx¯=(uJn)x¯x=0.
Lemma 1 (see [23]).
For any two mesh functions, u,v∈Zh0, one has
(13)〈vx,u〉=-〈v,ux-〉,〈ux^,v〉=-〈u,vx^〉,〈u,vxx¯〉=-〈ux,vx〉.
Then we have
(14)〈u,uxx¯〉=-〈ux,ux〉=-∥ux∥2.
Furthermore, if (u0n)xx¯=(uJn)xx¯=0, then
(15)〈u,uxxx¯x¯〉=∥uxx∥2.
Lemma 2.
Suppose that u∈H02[Xl,Xr]; then the solution of the initial-boundary value problem (4)–(6) satisfies
(16)∥u∥L2≤C,∥ux∥L2≤C,∥u∥∞≤C.
Proof.
It follows from the conservative law (8) that we get
(17)∥u∥L2≤C,∥uxx∥L2≤C.
Using part integration method, Hölder inequality, and Schwartz inequality, we get
(18)∥ux∥L22=∫XlXruxuxdx=uux|XlXr-∫XrXruuxxdx=-∫XlXruuxxdx≤∥u∥L2∥uxx∥L2≤12(∥u∥L22+∥uxx∥L22).
Hence, ∥ux∥L2≤C. According to Sobolev’s inequality, we have ∥u∥∞≤C.
Theorem 3.
Supposing u0∈H02[Xl,Xr], then the scheme (10)–(12) is conservative for discrete energy; that is,
(19)En=12(∥un+1∥2+∥un∥2)+12(∥uxxn+1∥2+∥uxxn∥2)=En-1=⋯=E0.
Proof.
Computing the inner product of (10) with 2u-n (i.e., un+1+un-1), we have
(20)h∑j=1J-1{12τ(ujn+1-ujn-1)·2u-jn+((u-jn)x^·2u-jn)+((u-jn)xx-x^·2u-jn)+12τ((ujn+1)xxx-x--(ujn-1)xxx-x-)·2u-jn12τ+(Pj·2u-jn)}=0,
where
(21)Pj=pp+1{(ujn)p-1·(u-jn)x^+[(u-jn)p-1·(u-jn)]x^}.
By the definition of (ujn)t^, it follows from the first term of (20) that
(22)h∑j=1J-1(12τ(ujn+1-ujn-1)·2u-jn)=12τ(∥un+1∥2-∥un-1∥2).
By the definition of ux^, (14), and Lemma 1, it follows from the second and the third term of (20) that
(23)∑j=1J-1((u-jn)x+(u-jn)x¯)·u-jn=∑j=1J-1(u-jn)x·u-jn+∑j=1J-1(u-jn)x¯·u-jn=0,∑j=1J-1(u-jn)xx-x^·2u-jn=0.
According to the boundary condition (12) and (14) of Lemma 1, it follows from the forth term that
(24)h∑j=1J-112τ((ujn+1)xxx-x--(ujn-1)xxx-x-)·2u-jn=12τ(∥uxxn+1∥2-∥uxxn-1∥2).
According to (13) and (14), we have
(25)〈P,2u-n〉=2php+1∑j=1J-1[(ujn)p-1·(u-jn)x^+[(ujn)p-1u-jn]x^]·u-jn=pp+1∑j=1J-1[(ujn)p-1·(u-j+1n-u-j-1n)+(uj+1n)p-1u-j+1n-(uj-1n)p-1u-j-1n]u-jn=pp+1∑j=1J-1[(ujn)p-1u-j+1nu-jn-(uj+1n)p-1u-j+1nu-jn]-pp+1∑j=1J-1[(uj-1n)p-1u-jnu-j-1n-(ujn)p-1u-jnu-j-1n]=0.
Substituting (22)–(25) into (20), we have
(26)(∥un+1∥2-∥un-1∥2)+(∥uxxn+1∥2-∥uxxn-1∥2)=0.
By the definition of En, (19) holds. It implies that the difference scheme is conservative for energy.
In order to prove the boundedness of the numerical solution, we introduce the following lemma [23].
Lemma 4 (Discrete Sobolev’s inequality).
There exist two constants C1 and C2 such that
(27)∥un∥∞≤C1∥un∥+C2∥uxn∥.
Theorem 5.
Suppose u0∈H02[Xl,Xr]; then the solution un of (10)–(12) satisfies ∥un∥≤C, ∥uxn∥≤C, which yield ∥un∥∞≤C(n=1,2,…,N).
Proof.
It follows from (19) that
(28)∥un∥≤C,∥uxxn∥≤C.
By Lemma 1 and Schwartz inequality, we get
(29)∥uxn∥2≤∥un∥∥uxxn∥≤12(∥un∥+∥uxxn∥)≤C.
According to Lemma 4, we have ∥un∥∞≤C(n=1,2,…,N).
3. SolvabilityTheorem 6.
There exists un∈Zh0(1≤n≤N) which satisfies the difference scheme (10)–(12).
Proof.
By mathematical induction, it is obvious that u0 is uniquely determined by the initial condition (11). We can choose a second-order method to compute u1 (such as C-N scheme [10, 15]). It implies that u0,u1 are uniquely determined. Now assuming u0,u1,…,un are uniquely solvable, consider un+1 in (10) which satisfies
(30)12τujn+1+(ujn+1)x^+(ujn+1)xx-x^+12τ(ujn+1)xxx¯x¯+p2(p+1){(ujn)p-1(ujn+1)x^+[(ujn)p-1ujn+1]x^}=0.
Computing the inner product of (30) with un+1, by (23) and (24), we obtain
(31)12τ∥un+1∥2+12τ∥uxxn+1∥2+〈Φ(un,un+1),un+1〉=0,
where Φ(un,un+1)=(p/2(p+1)){(un)p-1(un+1)x^+[(un)p-1un+1]x^},
(32)〈Φ(un,un+1),un+1〉=ph2(p+1)∑j=1J-1{(ujn)p-1(ujn+1)x^+[(ujn)p-1ujn+1]x^}ujn+1=p4(p+1)∑j=1J-1{(ujn)p-1(uj+1n+1-uj-1n+1)+[(uj+1n)p-1uj+1n+1-(uj-1n)p-1uj-1n+1]}ujn+1=0.
It follows from (31) that
(33)12τ∥un+1∥2+12τ∥uxxn+1∥2=0.
That is, there uniquely exists trivial solution satisfying (30). Therefore, ujn+1 in (10) is uniquely solvable.
This completes the proof of Theorem 6.
4. The Convergence and Stability of the Scheme
As usual, in order to prove the convergence and stability of the average linear difference scheme, we need to introduce the Discrete Gronwall inequality [23].
Lemma 7.
Suppose w(k), ρ(k) are nonnegative mesh functions and ρ(k) is nondecreasing. If C>0 and
(34)w(k)≤ρ(k)+Cτ∑l=0k-1w(l),∀k,
then
(35)w(k)≤ρ(k)eCτk,∀k.
Now, we discuss the convergence of the scheme (10)–(12); let vjn=v(xj,tn) be the analytical solution of problem (3)–(5); then the truncation error of the scheme (10)–(12) is
(36)Rjn=(vjn)t^+(vjn)x^+(vjn)xx-x^+(vjn)xxx¯x¯t^+p1+p{(vjn)p-1(v-jn)x^+[(vjn)p-1(v-jn)]x^}.
Using Taylor expansion, we know that Rjn=O(τ2+h2) holds if τ,h→0.
Theorem 8.
Supposing u0∈H02[Xl,Xr], u(x,t)∈C5,3, then the solution un of the scheme (10)–(12) converges to the solution of problem (3)–(5) and the rate of convergence is Rjn=O(τ2+h2) by the ∥·∥∞ norm.
Proof.
Subtracting (10) from (36) and letting ejn=vjn-ujn, we have
(37)Rjn=(ejn)t^+(e-jn)x^+(e-jn)xx-x^+(ejn)xxx¯x¯t^+p1+p{(vjn)p-1(v-jn)x^+[(vjn)p-1v-jn]x^}-p1+p{(ujn)p-1(u-jn)x^+[(ujn)p-1u-jn]x^}.
Computing the inner product of (37) with 2e-n and using
(38)〈(e-n)x^,2e-n〉=0,〈(e-n)xx-x^,2e-n〉=0.
Similar to (22) and (24), we get
(39)〈Rn,2e-n〉=12τ(∥en+1∥2-∥en-1∥2)+γ2τ(∥exxn+1∥2-∥exxn-1∥2)+〈Q1+Q2,2e-n〉,
where
(40)Q1=p1+p[(vn)p-1(vn)x^-(un)p-1(u-n)x^],Q2=p1+p{[(vn)p-1v-n]x^-[(un)p-1u-n]x^}.
Therefore, we get
(41)(∥en+1∥2-∥en-1∥2)+(∥exxn+1∥2-∥exxn-1∥2)=2τ〈rn,2e-n〉-2τ〈Q1+Q2,2e-n〉.
According to Lemma 2, Theorem 5, and Schwartz inequality, we have
(42)-〈Q1,2e-n〉=-2p1+ph∑j=0J-1[(vjn)p-1(v-jn)x^-(ujn)p-1(u-jn)x^]e-jn=-2p1+ph∑j=0J-1(vjn)p-1(e-jn)x^e-jn+-2p1+ph∑j=0J-1[(vjn)p-1-(ujn)p-1](u-jn)x^e-jn=-2p1+ph∑j=0J-1(vjn)p-1(e-jn)x^e-jn+-2p1+ph∑j=0J-1[ejn∑k=0p-2(vjn)p-2-k(ujn)k](u-jn)x^e-jn≤Ch∑j=0J-1|(e-jn)x^|·|e-jn|+Ch∑j=0J-1|(ejn)||(e-jn)|≤C[∥e-xn∥2+∥en∥2+∥e-n∥2]≤C[∥exn+1∥2+∥exn-1∥2+∥en+1∥2+∥en∥2+∥en-1∥2].
Similarly,
(43)-〈Q2,2e-n〉≤C[∥exn+1∥2+∥exn-1∥2+∥en+1∥2+∥en∥2+∥en-1∥2].
Furthermore,
(44)〈Rn,2e-n〉=〈Rn,en+1+en-1〉≤∥Rn∥2+12[∥en+1∥2+∥en-1∥2].
Substituting (42)–(44) into (41), we get
(45)(∥en+1∥2-∥en-1∥2)+(∥exxn+1∥2-∥exxn-1∥2)≤Cτ[∥exn+1∥2+∥exn∥2+∥exn-1∥2+∥en+1∥2+∥en∥2+∥en-1∥2]+2τ∥Rn∥2.
Similar to the proof of (29)
(46)∥exn∥2≤∥en∥∥exxn∥≤12(∥en∥+∥exxn∥)≤C.
It follows from (45) that
(47)[(∥en+1∥2+∥en∥2)+γ(∥exxn+1∥2+∥exxn∥2)]-[(∥en∥2+∥en-1∥2)+γ(∥exxn∥2+∥exxn-1∥2)]≤Cτ[∥en+1∥2+∥en∥2+∥en-1∥2+∥exxn+1∥2+∥exxn∥2+∥exxn-1∥2∥en∥2]+2τ∥Rn∥2.
Let Bn=∥en∥2+∥en+1∥2+∥exxn∥2+∥exxn+1∥2; it follows from (47) that
(48)(1-Cτ)(Bn+1-Bn)≤2CτBn+2τ∥Rn∥2.
If τ is sufficiently small which satisfies 1-Cτ>0, we get
(49)Bn+1-Bn≤CτBn+Cτ∥Rn∥2.
Summing up (49) from 0 to n-1, we get
(50)Bn≤B0+Cτ∑l=0n-1Bn+Cτ∑l=0n-1∥Rl∥2.
Choose a second-order method to compute u1 (such as C-N scheme) and notice that
(51)τ∑l=0n-1∥Rl∥2≤nτmax0≤l≤n-1∥Rl∥2≤T·O(τ2+h2)2.
From the discrete initial conditions, we know that e0=0; then we have
(52)B0=O(τ2+h2)2.
Therefore,
(53)Bn≤O(τ2+h2)2+Cτ∑l=0n-1Bl.
According to Lemma 7, we get
(54)Bn≤O(τ2+h2)2.
It implies
(55)∥en∥≤O(τ2+h2),∥exxn∥≤O(τ2+h2).
It follows from (29) that
(56)∥exn∥≤O(τ2+h2).
By Lemma 4, we have
(57)∥en∥∞≤O(τ2+h2).
This completes the proof of Theorem 8.
In order to prove the stability of the difference scheme, we import the initial-boundary problem
(58)ut+ux+uxxx+uxxxxt+(up)x=ω(x,t),hhhu(Xl,t)=u(Xr,t)=0,hiux(Xl,t)=ux(Xr,t)=0,uxx(Xl,t)=uxx(Xr,t)=0,hhhhhhhhhhhhhit∈[0,T],u(x,0)=u0(x)+ψ(x),x∈[Xl,Xr],
where ω(x,t),ψ(x) are smooth enough.
We propose the difference scheme of the problem (58)
(59)(Ujn)t^+(U-jn)x^+(U-jn)xx¯x^+(Ujn)xxx¯x¯t^+p1+p{(Ujn)p-1(U-jn)x^+[(Ujn)p-1U-jn]x^}+(ωjn)=0,Uj0=U0(xj)+ψj,0≤j≤J-1,U0n=UJn=0,(U0n)x^=(UJn)x^=0,(U0n)xx¯=(UJn)x¯x=0,
where ωjn=ω(xj,tn),ψj=ψ(xj).
Similar to the proof of Theorem 8, we can prove the stability Theorem 9.
Theorem 9.
Supposing {ujn} is the solution of the scheme (10)–(12) and {Ujn} is the solution of the scheme (59), denote εjn=Ujn-ujn. If the mesh steps h,τ are small enough, we can get the stability result
(60)∥εn∥+∥εxxn∥≤C(∥ψ∥2+τ∑l=0n-1∥ωl∥2).
5. Numerical Validation
In this section, we conduct some numerical experiments to verify theoretical results obtained in the previous sections. We take Xl=-60, Xr=90 and consider the two cases p=3,5, respectively.
According to [16, 17], when p=3, the soliton solution is as follows:
(61)u(x,t)=14-15+341×sech214-5+412[x-110(5+41)t],
and the initial condition is
(62)u(x,0)=14-15+341sech214-5+412x.
When p=5, the soliton solution is
(63)u(x,t)=415(-5+34)4×sech13-5+34[x-110(5+34)t],
and initial condition is
(64)u(x,0)=415(-5+34)4sech13-5+34x.
Since the three-level implicit finite difference scheme cannot start by itself, we need to select other two-level schemes (such as the C-N Scheme) to get u1. Then, reusing initial value u0, we apply the average implicit linear three-level difference scheme (10)–(12) for the problem (4)–(6) to work out u2,u3,…. Iterative method is not required for the linear scheme, so it saves computing time.
First of all, we simulate the wave graph of the numerical solution to the average linear implicit scheme (10)–(12). The wave graph comparison of numerical solution u(xj,tn) between different time step and space step at various times is given in Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 for p=3 and p=5. The figures show that the height of the wave graph at different time is almost identical. It implies that the energy is conservative.
Wave graph of u(x,t) at various times when p=3 and τ=h=0.25.
Wave graph of u(x,t) at various times when p=3 and τ=h=0.0625.
Wave graph of u(x,t) at various times when p=5 and τ=h=0.25.
Wave graph of u(x,t) at various times when p=5 and τ=h=0.03125.
Secondly, we conduct numerical simulations in different time step and space step for p=3 and p=5, respectively, when time is 40 s. We list some results in Tables 1 and 2 for p=3 and p=5, respectively. All results show that the numerical solution is 2nd-order convergent and unconditionally stable. Meanwhile, we also list the conservative invariants En at different time in Tables 3 and 4 for p=3 and p=5. These results testify that the studied scheme is conservative for energy.
The errors estimated in the sense of L∞ for p=3 at T=40.
h
τ
∥eN∥∞
∥eN(h,τ)∥∞/∥e2N(h/2,τ/2)∥∞
0.25
0.25
1.34986e-002
—
0.125
0.125
3.42489e-003
3.94134
0.0625
0.0625
8.59570e-004
3.98441
0.03125
0.03125
2.15150e-004
3.99521
The errors estimated in the sense of L∞ for p=5 at T=40.
h
τ
∥eN∥∞
∥eN(h,τ)∥∞/∥e2N(h/2,τ/2)∥∞
0.25
0.25
1.79985e-002
—
0.125
0.125
4.56804e-003
3.94009
0.0625
0.0625
1.14689e-003
3.98299
0.03125
0.03125
2.87085e-004
3.99494
The energy of different time in different time step and space step for p=3.
(h, τ)
T=10 s
T=20 s
T=30 s
T=40 s
(0.25, 0.25)
1.682528993311382
1.682528993311723
1.682528993311437
1.682528993311429
(0.125, 0.125)
1.682543082559648
1.682543082567992
1.682543082564207
1.682543082565549
(0.0625, 0.0625)
1.682546611032036
1.682546611133070
1.682546611138651
1.682546611129625
(0.03125, 0.03125)
1.682547494622366
1.682547493895496
1.682547493110830
1.682547493646520
The energy of different time in different time step and space step for p=5.
(h, τ)
T=10 s
T=20 s
T=30 s
T=40 s
(0.25, 0.25)
3.110674902410195
3.110674902410293
3.110674902409525
3.110674902410005
(0.125, 0.125)
3.110702938793859
3.110702938807032
3.110702938804688
3.110702938809395
(0.0625, 0.0625)
3.110709964290841
3.110709964308914
3.110709964158443
3.110709964168867
(0.03125, 0.03125)
3.110711721444649
3.110711720432934
3.110711717170060
3.110711718996421
6. Conclusions
In brief, we first proposed an average linear implicit scheme for the Generalized Rosenau-KdV equation, which has a wide range of applications in various areas of scientific researches. The solvability, convergence, energy conservation, and stability with O(τ2+h2) of the discrete solutions were analyzed in detail. Numerical simulations were carried out to testify that the theoretical analyses are right and our scheme is accurate and reliable.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
CuiY.MaoD. K.Numerical method satisfying the first two conservation laws for the Korteweg-de Vries equation2007227137639910.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.031MR2361527ZBL1131.65073ZhuS.ZhaoJ.The alternating segment explicit-implicit scheme for the dispersive equation200114665766210.1016/S0893-9659(01)80022-7MR1836066ZBL0996.65083BahadırA. R.Exponential finite-difference method applied to Korteweg-de Vries equation for small times2005160367568210.1016/j.amc.2003.11.025MR2111671ZBL1062.65087ÖzerS.KutluayS.An analytical-numerical method for solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation2005164378979710.1016/j.amc.2004.06.011MR2135019ZBL1070.65077RosenauP.A quasi-continuous description of a nonlinear transmission line19863482782910.1088/0031-8949/34/6B/020RosenauP.Dynamics of dense discrete systems19887910281042ParkM. A.On the Rosenau equation199092145152MR1084695ZBL0723.35071ChungS. K.HaS. N.Finite element Galerkin solutions for the Rosenau equation1994541-2395610.1080/00036819408840267MR1382206ZBL0830.65097OmraniK.AbidiF.AchouriT.KhiariN.A new conservative finite difference scheme for the Rosenau equation20082011-2354310.1016/j.amc.2007.11.039MR2432579ZBL1156.65078ChungS. K.Finite difference approximate solutions for the Rosenau equation1998691-214915610.1080/00036819808840652MR1708193ZBL0904.65093ChungS. K.PaniA. K.Numerical methods for the Rosenau equation2001773-435136910.1080/00036810108840914MR1975741ZBL1021.65048ManickamS. A. V.PaniA. K.ChungS. K.A second-order splitting combined with orthogonal cubic spline collocation method for the Rosenau equation199814669571610.1002/(SICI)1098-2426(199811)14:6<695::AID-NUM1>3.3.CO;2-FMR1653330ZBL0930.65111KimY. D.LeeH. Y.The convergence of finite element Galerkin solution for the Roseneau equation199851171180MR1600314ZBL0977.65080ZuoJ. M.Solitons and periodic solutions for the Rosenau-KdV and Rosenau-Kawahara equations2009215283584010.1016/j.amc.2009.06.011MR2561541ZBL1175.65124HuJ.XuY.HuB.Conservative linear difference scheme for Rosenau-KdV equation20132013710.1155/2013/423718423718MR3046943ZBL06171635EsfahaniA.Solitary wave solutions for generalized Rosenau-KdV equation201155339639810.1088/0253-6102/55/3/04MR2884092ZBL1264.35192RazborovaP.TrikiH.BiswasA.Perturbation of dispersive shallow water waves2013631710.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.01.014
EbadiG.MojaverA.TrikiH.YildirimA.BiswasA.Topological solitons and other solutions of the Rosenau-KdV equation with power law nonlinearity2013581-2314MR3040472SahaA.Topological 1-soliton solutions for the generalized Rosenau-KdV equation2012211923ChowdhuryA.BiswasA.Singular solitons and numerical analysis of Φ-four equation20126article 4210.1186/2251-7456-6-42MR3036949SuarezP.JohnsonS.BiswasA.Chebyshev split-step scheme for the sine-Gordon equation in 2+1 dimensions20131416975MR3033797ChristouM. A.TodorovM. D.Christov-galerkin expansion for localized solutions in model equations with higher order dispersionProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Applications of Mathematics in Engineering and EconomicsJune 2007CP94691982-s2.0-3684909541610.1063/1.2806043ZhouY. L.1991Beijing, ChinaInternational Academic PublishersMR1133399