Journal of Applied Mathematics

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 701964, 9 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/701964

Research Article

Novel Simplified Model for Asynchronous Machine with Consideration of Frequency Characteristic

Changchun Cai,1,2,3 Ping Ju,2,4 and Yuqing Jin⁴

¹Changzhou Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic System Integration and Production Equipment Technology, Hohai University, No. 200 Jinling Road, Changzhou City, China

²Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Power Transmission & Distribution Equipment Technology, Hohai University, No. 200 Jinling Road, Changzhou City, China

³College of The Internet of Things Engineering, Hohai University, No. 200 Jinling Road, Changzhou City, China

⁴College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, Hohai University, No. 1 Xikang Road, Nanjing City, China

Received 23 January 2014; Revised 4 May 2014; Accepted 12 May 2014; Published 26 May 2014

Academic Editor: Hongjie Jia

Copyright © 2014 Changchun Cai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The frequency characteristic of electric equipment should be considered in the digital simulation of power systems. The traditional asynchronous machine third-order transient model excludes not only the stator transient but also the frequency characteristics, thus decreasing the application sphere of the model and resulting in a large error under some special conditions. Based on the physical equivalent circuit and Park model for asynchronous machines, this study proposes a novel asynchronous third-order transient machine model with consideration of the frequency characteristic. In the new definitions of variables, the voltages behind the reactance are redefined as the linear equation of flux linkage. In this way, the rotor voltage equation is not associated with the derivative terms of frequency. However, the derivative terms of frequency should not always be ignored in the application of the traditional third-order transient model. Compared with the traditional third-order transient model, the novel simplified third-order transient model with consideration of the frequency characteristic is more accurate without increasing the order and complexity. Simulation results show that the novel third-order transient model for the asynchronous machine is suitable and effective and is more accurate than the widely used traditional simplified third-order transient model under some special conditions with drastic frequency fluctuations.

1. Introduction

Voltage sag is a common phenomenon during power system failure, whereas system frequency remains constant in large-scale power systems. Consequently, traditional power system modeling and simulation are focused on the voltage characteristics of power equipment with less consideration of the frequency characteristic. However, with the high penetration of distributed generation [1, 2], system frequency will fluctuate when a random imbalance between power generation and demand exists. For example, a fault or a sudden change in power loading in a microgrid [3–5] will cause a relatively large frequency fluctuation because the system inertia is small. In addition, in some isolated grids (e.g., XinJiang and Hainan power grids in China), system failures also produce frequency problems [6–9]. Thus, the frequency characteristic of equipment should be considered in power system modeling and simulation.

Asynchronous machines, which contain asynchronous induction motors and induction generators, are important equipment in power systems. Dynamic load comprises induction motors [6–15] and a large number of wind power generators, such as induction generators or doubly fed induction generators (DFIGs) [16–22]. Third-order electromechanical transient model for asynchronous machines is widely used in power system simulation. The traditional form of this model cannot represent the frequency characteristic of asynchronous machines because this simplified model only assumes that the frequency is constant and ignores the first derivative of frequency during derivation. The simulation results are acceptable when using the traditional third-order transient model under the conditions that frequency fluctuates slightly or without consideration of the frequency fluctuation. However, when studying the power grid with high penetration of distributed generation, the use of the traditional third-order transient model will generate significant error in the simulation result in contrast to the field measurement. Load modeling with consideration of the frequency and the voltage is discussed in [8]. The improved measure-based load modeling can reflect the real load dynamic characteristic well. A novel frequency regulation by DFIG-based wind turbines (WTs) used to coordinate inertial control, rotor speed control, and pitch angle control is studied in [23]. The coordinated control enhances frequency regulation capability and damps frequency oscillations. The capability of WTs to participate in the primary frequency control and to offer primary reserve is discussed in [24], in which transient frequency support and permanent frequency response were also investigated.

To represent the voltage and the frequency characteristics of an asynchronous machine during simulation, this paper proposes a novel simplified third-order transient model by redefining the variables and parameters of the traditional model. In this novel simplified third-order model, the definition of transient variable provides a clear physical interpretation. The novel simplified third-order model can accurately represent the frequency characteristic of asynchronous machines. Meanwhile, this variable will not increase the order and complexity of the model. Finally, simulation results verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the novel simplified third-order transient model in power system simulation.

2. Park Model of Asynchronous Machine

Figure 1 shows the circuits applicable to the analysis of an asynchronous machine. The stator circuits comprise three-phase windings , , and distributed 120° apart in space. The rotor circuits contain three distributed windings , , and .

Figure 1: Stator and rotor circuits of an induction motor.

Neglecting saturation, hysteresis, and eddy currents and assuming a purely sinusoidal distribution of flux waves, the machine equations can be written as follows [25].

The stator and rotor voltage equations are given by

where represents voltage, represents current, represents the flux linking the winding denoted by the subscript, is the stator phase resistance, is the rotor phase resistance, and subscripts and are the stator and rotor windings, respectively.

is defined as the angle by which the axis of the phase rotor winding leads the axis of phase stator winding in the direction of rotation, with a constant rotor angular velocity of :

and with a constant slip :

Figure 2 shows that the electrical angular velocity of reference frame and rotating reference frame is in , the axis of winding leads to the axis of winding in the direction of rotation, and axis coincides with the axis of phase stator winding at initial moment .

Figure 2: Convolution vector diagram.

By applying the transformation equation, we obtain the following expressions as regards the transformed components of voltage, flux linkages, and currents [25].

Stator voltage equations:

rotor voltage equations:

The terms and are the transformer voltages, similar to and .

Stator flux linkage equations are as follows:

Rotor flux leakage equations are as follows:

with and , where , , and are stator leakage, rotor leakage, and mutual inductances, respectively.

Eliminating phase voltage and current in terms of components, we obtain

The air-gap torque is obtained by dividing the power transferred across the air gap by the rotor speed in mechanical radians per second:

where subscripts and represent the rotor and stator, respectively.

3. Traditional Simplified Asynchronous Machine Model

With the exclusion of the stator transients,

The following variables and parameters [25] are defined as

Rewriting (7), we obtain

The rotor voltage of the component of (5) may be written as

From the above equation, may be written as

Thus, (13) may be written as

In a similar way, the component of rotor voltage is given by

The term is usually excluded in system simulation in previous studies, and asynchronous machine transient model equations can be rewritten as follows:

Compared with (15) and (16), and are excluded in (17), which indicates that frequency is regarded as a constant in the third-order transient model of the asynchronous machine. However, this assumption will result in errors as frequency changes significantly.

4. Novel Simplified Asynchronous Machine Model

4.1. Variables and Parameters Redefinition

To represent the effect of frequency fluctuation and keep the simplicity of the third-order transient model of asynchronous machine, the variables and parameters should be redefined as follows:

Compared with (11), and have a linear relationship with flux linkage, whereby the angular frequencies , , and are excluded.

4.2. Rotor Voltage Equations

From (12) and (18), the rotor voltage of the component can be written as

where

Thus, (19) may be written as

Based on a similar principle, we can obtain the rotor voltage equation of the component. The asynchronous machine transient model equations may then be rewritten as follows:

does not appear in the process of derivation, which indicates that frequency is not excluded in the novel simplified third-order transient model. With the new definition, and do not include angular frequency , and inductances and are the parameters of the transient model, which can better reflect the physical characteristics of the asynchronous machine in the model.

4.3. Stator Voltage Equations

To reduce equations and make the model suitable for a stability program, we eliminate the rotor currents and express the relationship between stator current and voltage relative to a voltage behind the transient reactance. Thus, from (12) and (6), we obtain

Substituting the above equation for in (4), the stator voltage equation of the component may be rewritten as

Similarly, we can obtain the component of stator voltage equation, whereby the stator voltage equations may be written as

From (13) and (9), the electromagnetic torque equation can be expressed as

4.4. Model Equations under System Reference Frame

The transient model equations should be transformed into public reference frame in system simulation. Figure 2 shows the relationship between reference frame and reference frame with a similar angular velocity in . is the angle by which the axis of leads the axis of in the direction of rotation. The transformation equation is

As a result, the transient model is obtained as follows.

Transient equations:

stator voltage equations:

electromagnetic torque equation:

rotor acceleration equation:

where per unit and is the initial slip of the asynchronous machine. If the asynchronous machine absorbs power, then ; otherwise, if the asynchronous machine produces power.

5. Model Analysis

Asynchronous machines are known to contain asynchronous induction motors and asynchronous generators; the difference between them lies in the acceleration and rotor voltage equations.

5.1. Asynchronous Induction Motor Model

An induction motor is a common asynchronous machine that converts electrical energy into mechanical energy based on the electromagnetic induction principle. The rotor voltage of the induction motor is zero , such that the novel simplified third-order transient model for the induction motor with consideration of the frequency characteristics is shown as follows.

Transient equations:

acceleration equation:

stator voltage equations:

5.2. Asynchronous Generator Model

Asynchronous generators are widely used in wind power generation. Most early wind generators are fixed-speed WT generators, and the induction generator operates at a constant speed. The use of variable speed constant frequency WT generators, such as the DFIG, is the mainstream in newly built wind farms. However, the models of different induction generators are similar, which may be written as follows.

Transient equations:

acceleration equation:

stator voltage equations:

where and are the equivalent rotor voltage with the following conditions: for fixed-speed WT generators the rotor voltage and for variable speed constant frequency WT generators, which can supply rotor voltage through rotor side converter, the rotor voltage .

6. Simulation Analysis

A simplified power grid that contains composite load and wind generator, as shown in Figure 3, is built in Matlab/Simulink to test the performance of the novel simplified asynchronous machine model with consideration of frequency characteristics. Tables 1 and 2 list the parameters of this simulation system. The power grid is an isolated power system with a 300 kW capacity. The load of this power grid comprises static load (ZIP) and asynchronous induction motor, which consume the total power output from the wind generator during normal operation. A synchronous generator is used as a phase converter to maintain system voltage. The capacitors with 75 kvar total capacity are used to supply reactive power.

Table 1: Wind generator parameters.

Para.
Value
Unit
Para.
Value
Unit

0.0092
pu

0.0717
pu

0.0717
pu

4
s

3.5
pu

60
Hz

0.007
pu

300
KVA

Table 2: Induction motor parameters.

Para.
Value
Unit
Para.
Value
Unit

0.016
pu

4
s

0.06
pu

60
Hz

3.5
pu

100
KVA

0.015
pu

10
m/s

0.06
pu

Figure 3: Simulation system.

The responses of the novel simplified third-order transient model of the asynchronous machine (both induction motor and wind generator) under a decrease in wind speed and electrical load fault are studied. During the disturbance, the output power of wind generator is fluctuate, as well as the consume power of motor machine. Power system will recover stability when the disturbance is clear. It cannot come to opposite conclusions with the two models.

6.1. Case A

In the first case, the initial load is assumed to be 200 kW, which increases suddenly to 300 kW in approximately 0.2 s, thereafter returning to 200 kW. Figure 4 shows that the system frequency decreases in response to the sudden increase in load and the derivative of frequency is shown in Figure 5. Subsequently, the system reaches a new stable operating point, and the frequency recovers slowly after an obvious fluctuation.

Figure 4: System frequency.

Figure 5: .

Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9 show a comparison between the output active and reactive power of the traditional simplified third-order transient model, novel simplified third-order transient model, and detailed Park model of induction motor and wind generator. As the load increases, the wind generator produces more active power and absorbs more reactive power. The output power of the novel simplified third-order transient model with consideration of the frequency is shown to be more accurate than that of the traditional simplified third-order transient model and almost matches that of the Park model.

Figure 6: The active power of induction motor.

Figure 7: Reactive power of induction motor.

Figure 8: Active power of wind generator.

Figure 9: Reactive power of wind generator.

Table 3 shows the accumulated errors between the traditional simplified third-order transient model and novel simplified third-order transient model compared with the detailed model (Park model). The error between the novel simplified transient model with consideration of the frequency and the detailed model is shown to be less than that between the traditional simplified transient model and the detailed model.

Table 3: Error analysis of different models.

Machine type
Relative error

Active power
Reactive power

Induction motor

    Traditional simplified model
0.00962
0.020067

    Novel simplified model
0.000134
0.01213

Wind generator

    Traditional simplified model
0.02963
0.0314542

    Novel simplified model
0.02076
0.0306382

6.2. Case B

A wind speed disturbance is used to analyze the effect of frequency in the second case. To highlight the frequency fluctuation as a result of wind speed change, an assumed wind condition is used with a 10 m/s initial wind speed, which drops to 7 m/s and recovers to 10 m/s in 0.2 s, as shown in Figure 10. Figure 14 shows the output power of a WT generator. The figure also shows that the generated wind power decreases in response to the decrease in wind speed and the active power of the induction motor absorbed the decrease with a drop in voltage. Figure 11 shows that the system frequency decreases rapidly because of the unbalanced generation of active power and load and recovers slowly when the wind speed returns to 10 m/s.

Figure 10: Wind speed variable.

Figure 11: System frequency.

Figures 12 to 15 show the comparison between the output active and reactive power of the traditional third-order transient model, novel simplified third-order transient model with consideration of the frequency, and detailed Park model of induction motor and wind generator. In the novel simplified third-order transient model with consideration of the frequency, the output of the induction motor and wind generator can better track the output of the detailed model (Park model). The active power error is less than the reactive power error (see Figures 13 and 15).

Figure 12: Active power of induction motor.

Figure 13: Reactive power of induction motor.

Figure 14: Active power of wind generator.

Figure 15: Reactive power of wind generator.

Table 4 shows that the accumulated error of active power and reactive power between the novel simplified third-order transient model (both induction motor and wind generator) and Park model is less.

Table 4: Error analysis of different models.

Machine type
Relative error

Active power
Reactive power

Induction motor

    Traditional simplified model
0.016065
0.02318

    Novel simplified model
0.003851
0.006983

Wind generator

    Traditional simplified model
0.027847
0.044735

    Novel simplified model
0.009233
0.02119

7. Conclusions

A novel simplified third-order transient model with consideration of the frequency characteristics of an asynchronous machine is proposed in this paper. The new model focuses on the effects of frequency fluctuation on the power system dynamics. In the new definitions of variables, the voltages behind the reactance are redefined as the linear equation of flux linkage. As a result, the rotor voltage equation is not associated with the derivative terms of frequency. The novel transient model is applicable to the simulation of the power system dynamic with a significant change in frequency. Simulation results verify that the novel simplified third-order transient model is effective and can describe more accurately the dynamics of an asynchronous machine in contrast to the traditional simplified third-order transient model.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51137002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (10B101-08), the Open Fund of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Power Transmission & Distribution Equipment Technology (2011JSSPD11), the Open Fund of Changzhou Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic System Integration and Production Equipment Technology and The Science and Technology Foundation of Changzhou (CE20130043).

References

S. A. Khaparde, “Infrastructure for sustainable development using renewable energy technologies in India,” in IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (PES '07), June 2007.

W. El-Khattam, T. S. Sidhu, and R. Seethapathy, “Evaluation of two anti-islanding schemes for a radial distribution system equipped with self-excited induction generator wind turbines,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107–117, 2010.

R. H. Lasseter, “MicroGrids,” in IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, pp. 305–308, January 2002.

A. L. Dimeas and N. D. Hatziargyriou, “Operation of a multiagent system for microgrid control,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1447–1455, 2005.

N. Hatziargyriou, H. Asano, R. Iravani, and C. Marnay, “Microgrids,” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 78–94, 2007.

R. He, J. Ye, D. Ling, and S. Pang, “Impacts of load model parameters on system frequency during the system transients,” Automation of Electric Power Systems, vol. 34, no. 24, pp. 27–30, 2010.

X. Zhang, P. Ju, Q. Chen, et al., “Study and application of load models considering frequency characteristics,” Jorunal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 2010.

R. He, J. Ye, H. Xu, and B. Lang, “Measurement-based load modeling considering frequency characteristics,” Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 165–183, 2011.

J.-C. Wang, H.-D. Chiang, C.-L. Chang, A.-H. Liu, C.-H. Huang, and C.-Y. Huang, “Development of a frequency-dependent composite load model using the measurement approach,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1546–1556, 1994.

L. Pereira, D. Kosterev, P. Mackin, D. Davies, J. Undrill, and W. Zhu, “An interim dynamic induction motor model for stability studies in the WSCC,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1108–1115, 2002.

K.-H. Tseng, W.-S. Kao, and J.-R. Lin, “Load model effects on distance relay settings,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1140–1146, 2003.

P. Ju, E. Handschin, Z. N. Wei, et al., “Sequential parameter estimation of a simplified induction motor model,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 319–324, 1996.

T. Omata and K. Uemura, “Aspects of voltage responses of induction motor loads,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1337–1344, 1998.

M. Jin, H. Renmu, and D. J. Hill, “Load modeling by finding support vectors of load data from field measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 726–735, 2006.

Q. Ai, D. Gu, and C. Chen, “New load modeling approaches based on field tests for fast transient stability calculations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1864–1873, 2006.

D. L. H. Aik, “A general-order system frequency response model incorporating load shedding: analytic modeling and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 709–717, 2006.

G. W. Scott, V. F. Wilreker, and R. K. Shaltens, “Wind turbine generator interaction with diesel generators on an isolated power system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 933–937, 1984.

J. G. Slootweg, S. W. H. De Haan, H. Polinder, and W. L. Kling, “General model for representing variable speed wind turbines in power system dynamics simulations,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 144–151, 2003.

C. Mi, M. Filippa, J. Shen, and N. Natarajan, “Modeling and control of a variable-speed constant-frequency synchronous generator with brushless exciter,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 565–573, 2004.

J. W. Taylor, P. E. McSharry, and R. Buizza, “Wind power density forecasting using ensemble predictions and time series models,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 775–782, 2009.

Z.-S. Zhang, Y.-Z. Sun, J. Lin, and G.-J. Li, “Coordinated frequency regulation by doubly fed induction generator-based wind power plants,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 38–47, 2012.

F. Wu, X.-P. Zhang, K. Godfrey, and P. Ju, “Small signal stability analysis and optimal control of a wind turbine with doubly fed induction generator,” IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 751–760, 2007.

F. Wu, X.-P. Zhang, P. Ju, and M. J. H. Sterling, “Decentralized nonlinear control of wind turbine with doubly fed induction generator,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 613–621, 2008.

I. D. Margaris, S. A. Papathanassiou, N. D. Hatziargyriou, A. D. Hansen, and P. Sorensen, “Frequency control in autonomous power systems with high wind power penetration,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2012.

P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 1993.