Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 1462013, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1462013

Research Article

Selective and Sensitive Detection of Cyanide Based on the Displacement Strategy Using a Water-Soluble Fluorescent Probe

Ming La,1,2 Yuanqiang Hao,³ Zhaoyang Wang,⁴ Guo-Cheng Han,⁵ and Lingbo Qu¹

¹College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
²College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, Henan 467000, China
³Henan Key Laboratory Cultivation Base of Nanobiological Analytical Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shangqiu Normal University, Shangqiu 476000, China
⁴Changjun Middle School of Changsha, Changsha 410002, China
⁵School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China

Received 12 September 2015; Revised 7 December 2015; Accepted 10 December 2015

Academic Editor: Jose Vicente Ros-Lis

Copyright © 2016 Ming La et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A water-soluble fluorescent probe (C-GGH) was used for the highly sensitive and selective detection of cyanide (CN⁻) in aqueous media based on the displacement strategy. Due to the presence of the recognition unit GGH (Gly-Gly-His), the probe C-GGH can coordinate with Cu²⁺ and consequently display ON-OFF type fluorescence response. Furthermore, the in situ formed nonfluorescent C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex can act as an effective OFF-ON type fluorescent probe for sensing CN⁻ anion. Due to the strong binding affinity of CN⁻ to Cu²⁺, CN⁻ can extract Cu²⁺ from C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex, leading to the release of C-GGH and the recovery of fluorescent emission of the system. The probe C-GGH-Cu²⁺ allowed detection of CN⁻ in aqueous solution with a LOD (limit of detection) of 0.017 μmol/L which is much lower than the maximum contaminant level (1.9 μmol/L) for CN⁻ in drinking water set by the WHO (World Health Organization). The probe also displayed excellent specificity for CN⁻ towards other anions, including F⁻, Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, SCN⁻, , , , AcO⁻, , and .

1. Introduction

The development of effective methods for the recognition and sensing of anions has recently received considerable attention due to the importance of these species in biological and industrial processes [1–6]. Among various anions, cyanide (CN⁻) is considered to be one of the most toxic species due to its capability to bind strongly to ferric ions in cytochrome oxidase and reduce the activity of this enzyme [7]. Assimilation of CN⁻ through skin, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract can lead to convulsion, unconsciousness, and eventually death [8]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the maximum permissible level of CN⁻ in drinking water is 1.9 μmol/L [9]. But, on the other hand, cyanide is extremely useful in various industrial processes such as gold mining, electroplating, metallurgy, and production of organic chemicals and polymers [10, 11]. The widespread industrial use of cyanide inevitably causes the accidental release of cyanide into the environment, therefore leading to serious problems. Consequently, it is highly required to exploit effective ways for monitoring the presence of cyanide anion [4, 12].

Various analytical methods and techniques have been developed for the determination of CN⁻, including titrimetry [13], voltammetry [14, 15], chromatography [16, 17], colorimetry [18, 19], and fluorometry [4, 12]. Many of these methods involve strict requirements of the sample handling, such as acidification of the CN⁻ followed by extraction of HCN. Therefore, quick methods that permit selective in situ determination of CN⁻ with high selectivity are highly required for medical point-of-care, industrial, and environmental online monitoring. Fluorometric assays based on optical probes possess innate advantages over other techniques, because of their simplicity of implementation, fast response times, high sensitivity, and excellent selectivity [20, 21]. Among the fluorescent probes, there are mainly four strategies for CN⁻ sensing: (i) coordination to electron-deficient center [15], (ii) nucleophilic addition to the electron-deficient π-system [22, 23], (iii) hydrogen-bonding interaction [24, 25], and (iv) metal-CN⁻ affinity (displacement approach) [26–29]. Among these four approaches, the displacement strategy, where CN⁻ extracts Cu²⁺ from the metal receptor complex to form stable , resulting in a detectable optical signal, has attracted special attention. Cu(II) complexes of fluorescent chromophores are usually nonfluorescent due to the paramagnetic quenching effect. Upon the addition of cyanide, CN⁻ ions react with copper ion in such nonfluorescent copper complex to form very stable species. This results in the recovery of the fluorescence of the chromophore. Thus, a type of turn-on fluorescent CN⁻ probe has been developed based on Cu(II) ensembles. In designing such probe, fluorophores with high quantum yields are required in order to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, a recognition unit with high affinity towards Cu²⁺ should be incorporated to ensure that fluorescence quenching occurs upon addition of Cu²⁺. In the literature, there are few reports on Cu²⁺-ensemble based receptors for the fluorescence turn-on optical detection of CN⁻. However, most of these receptors have the drawbacks of poor selectivity and/or poor water solubility.

In previous work, we reported a fluorescent probe C-GGH by incorporation of a natural tripeptide GGH (Gly-Gly-His) moiety to a coumarin fluorophore. Taking advantage of the natural tripeptide GGH, the probe exhibits excellent biocompatibility and water solubility [30]. Herein, we exploited this probe for the detection of CN⁻ based on a displacement sensing strategy. Due to the specific recognition of Cu²⁺ by GGH, the probe can bind with copper ions to form C-GHH-Cu²⁺ complex, and the paramagnetic Cu²⁺ center has a pronounced quenching effect on the fluorescence of the probe. Then, in the presence of CN⁻, Cu²⁺ can be released from the complex of C-GHH-Cu²⁺, resulting in the luminescence restoration of the probe. The ensemble C-GGH-Cu²⁺ allowed detection of CN⁻ in aqueous solution with high sensitivity and excellent selectivity.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Instrumentation

All chemical reagents and solvents for synthesis were of analytical grade and commercially available and used as received without further purification unless otherwise stated. Deionized water (18 MΩ cm⁻¹) from a water purification system (Simplicity Plus, Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA) was used throughout. C-GGH (coumarin-Gly-Gly-His) was synthesized by following standard solid phase 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) chemistry according to our previously reported procedure [30].

The fluorescence spectra were carried out on a Varian Cary Eclipse spectrofluorimeter. The absorbance spectra were recorded on a Varian UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The excitation wavelength was 420 nm. The excitation and emission slit width were set both at 5 nm. All experiments were conducted at room temperature.

2.2. UV-Vis and Fluorescence Titration Experiments

The detection measurements were conducted as follows. First, the stock solution of the sensor was prepared by dissolving the sensor compound in HEPES buffered aqueous solution (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0) containing 1.0 mmol/L CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide). The stock solution of was prepared by dissolving in HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). Before the measurements, the probe stock solution and the CN⁻ stock solution were diluted with HEPES buffered water (pH 10.0), and then the diluted CN⁻ was added to the diluted probe solution; afterward, the fluorescence spectra were recorded immediately. All spectrum tests were carried out in a HEPES buffered (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0) aqueous solution containing 1 mmol/L CTAB.

2.3. Detection of CN⁻ in Real Sample

To begin with, 10 mL of cyanide-containing gold leach waste solution (taken from a gold mine tailings pond in Hunan, China) was diluted with 90 mL water. And the solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm PTFE filter. Then 4 μL of the above solution was added to 2 mL probe solution. Subsequently, various concentrations of CN⁻ were introduced into the above mixtures and the fluorescent spectra were recorded.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Absorption and Fluorescence Spectroscopy of  C-GGH to Cu²⁺

The interaction of C-GGH with Cu²⁺ was investigated by UV-Vis spectrophotometric titration in HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of C-GGH displayed a strong absorbance band centered at about 430 nm, which is the characteristic absorption profile of 7-diethylaminocoumarin-3-carboxylic acid. Titrations of Cu²⁺ with solutions of C-GGH led to substantial changes in UV-Vis spectra. As shown in Figure 1, upon an increase in the concentration of introduced Cu²⁺ (0-1 equiv. of Cu²⁺), the maximum absorbance intensity gradually decreased and shifted to about 410 nm, indicating the coordination of C-GGH to a paramagnetic Cu²⁺ center. Appearance of an isosbestic point at 405 nm also demonstrates the formation of a well-defined complex between C-GGH and Cu²⁺. The absorbance band was no longer changed noticeably when the concentration of Cu²⁺ increased from 1 to 2 equiv. (Figure 1, inset), suggesting 1 : 1 complexation of the probe with the Cu²⁺ ion.

Figure 1: UV-Vis absorption responses of C-GGH (10 μmol/L) upon the addition of different concentrations of Cu²⁺ (0–2 equiv.) in HEPES buffer aqueous solution (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). Inset: the corresponding changes of absorption intensity of C-GGH at 430 nm in the presence of different concentrations of Cu²⁺.

The fluorescence spectra of C-GGH were obtained by excitation of the fluorophore at 430 nm in HEPES buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0), and a strong emission peak was observed at 478 nm. First, to gain insight into the sensing properties of C-GGH, the emission characteristics were examined in the presence of various metal species. The addition of 2 equiv. of K⁺, Zn²⁺, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, Ca²⁺, Cd²⁺, Na⁺, Li⁺, Ba²⁺, Mn²⁺, Mg²⁺, Al³⁺, Pb²⁺, and Ni²⁺ had no obvious effect on the fluorescence emission of C-GGH (Figure 2(a)). When 1 equiv. of Cu²⁺ was added to the probe solution, dramatic fluorescent quenching was observed, suggesting that probe C-GGH shows a specific response to Cu²⁺ which can be ascribed to the selective coordination of GGH to Cu²⁺ and the chelation-enhanced fluorescence quenching (CHEQ) effect of the paramagnetic Cu²⁺ center.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: (a) Fluorescence responses of C-GGH (1 μmol/L) to different ions (2 equiv. for K⁺, Zn²⁺, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, Ca²⁺, Na⁺, Mn²⁺, Mg²⁺, Al³⁺, and Pb²⁺; 1 equiv for Cu²⁺) in HEPES buffer aqueous solution (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). Fluorescence titration of C-GGH (1 μmol/L) with Cu²⁺ (0–2 equiv.) in HEPES aqueous buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). Inset shows fluorescence changes of C-GGH at 478 nm as a function of the Cu²⁺ concentration.

To quantitatively evaluate the luminescence response of C-GGH towards Cu²⁺, fluorescence titration with Cu²⁺ ions in varying concentrations was conducted. As shown in Figure 3(b), the emission band of C-GGH was gradually quenched upon addition of incremental amounts of Cu²⁺. The dose-dependent luminescence quenching shows a good correlation that can be expressed as × ([Cu²⁺]/μmol/L) (). The LOD (limit of detection) of C-GGH for determination of Cu²⁺ was calculated to be 21 nM (). This value is much lower than the maximum contaminant level (~20 μmol/L) for copper in drinking water set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [31], indicating that the probe C-GGH is sensitive enough to monitor Cu²⁺ for environmental assessment.

Figure 3: Fluorescence intensity of C-GGH at different pH: (a) free C-GGH, (b) C-GGH and Cu²⁺. Concentration of C-GGH is kept constant at 1.0 μmol/L. Concentration of Cu²⁺ is 1.0 μmol/L. Excitation is selected at 430 nm.

To investigate the range of pH in which C-GGH can effectively respond to Cu²⁺, we measured the titration curve of fluorescence intensity versus pH of the aqueous solution (Figure 3, curve a). The free C-GGH exhibited strong fluorescence in the studied pH range of 4–12. The effect of pH on the fluorescence of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ exhibited a quite different feature from that of the free probe C-GGH (Figure 3, curve b). The pronounced difference was observed in the range of pH > 10 in which the fluorescence intensity remained at a very low level. Clearly, the binding of Cu²⁺ caused this quenching. When pH was less than 10, the fluorescence intensity appeared to increase, and at pH 4, it reached the same level as that of the free probe C-GGH. This indicates that the C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex dissociates into free ligand and ion, and thus Cu²⁺ causes no quenching to the fluorescence of C-GGH. The final pH value for this sensing system was set at 10.0.

3.2. Fluorescence Response of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ to CN⁻

Cyanide anion can coordinate with Cu²⁺ to form a highly stable species which has a much lower solubility product constant () compared with that of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ () [30]. Therefore, the in situ formed C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex could be a promising “OFF-ON” type luminescent sensor for the CN⁻ anion based on displacement approach. To investigate the luminescence response of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ towards CN⁻ in 100% aqueous media, a luminescence titration experiment was conducted by introducing different concentrations of CN⁻ into C-GGH-Cu²⁺ (1 μmol/L) in 10 mmol/L HEPES buffer of pH 10.0. As shown in Figure 4, the emission intensity of the probe solution is increased steadily with incremental amounts of CN⁻, and on addition of about 15 equiv. of CN⁻ anion both the intensity and shape of the emission spectrum of C-GGH were completely restored. The dose-dependent luminescence enhancement shows good linearity over a concentration range of 0.2–15.0 μmol/L, which can be expressed as × ([CN⁻]/μmol/L) () (Figure 4(b)). The LOD of C-GGH probe for CN⁻ was calculated to be 0.017 μmol/L which lies well below the limit of 1.9 μmol/L for CN⁻ in drinking water set by WHO, indicating that the probe is sensitive enough for practical applications.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: (a) Fluorescence titration of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ (1.0 μmol/L) with CN⁻ (0–30 equiv., 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, 14.0, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, and 30.0 μmol/L, resp.) in HEPES aqueous buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). (b) Dose-dependent luminescence response of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ (1.0 μmol/L) to CN⁻.

It is well known that the most significant behavior of a chemosensor is the high selectivity towards the analyte. In order to evaluate the selectivity of the proposed sensor for CN⁻, fluorescence responses of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ in the presence of various anions including F⁻, Cl⁻, Br⁻, I⁻, SCN⁻, , , , AcO⁻, , and were measured. All these physiological and environmental important anions induced negligible fluorescence intensity changes (Figure 5(a)). Thus, the in situ generated C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex can behave as a high selective luminescent “OFF-ON” sensor for CN⁻. To explore whether the C-GGH-Cu²⁺ complex could maintain its sensing response to CN⁻ in the presence of various other relevant interferences, competition experiments of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ were conducted. Figure 5(b) shows the luminescence responses of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ to CN⁻ in the presence of various other anions. The results indicated that none of the other anions interfered with CN⁻ detection. All other anions only caused very weak background signal, while upon consequent addition of CN⁻ to each mixture, immediate enhancement in luminescence response was achieved.

(a)

(b)

Figure 5: (a) Fluorescence changes of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ (1.0 μmol/L) in the presence of various anions (15.0 μmol/L) in HEPES aqueous buffer (10 mmol/L, pH 10.0). (b) Fluorescence responses of C-GGH (10 μmol/L) at 478 nm in the presence of different anions (15.0 μmol/L) (low bars), followed by addition of CN⁻ (15.0 μmol/L) (high bars).

3.3. Detection of CN⁻ in Real Sample

To assess the ability of C-GGH-Cu²⁺ for practical application, the probe was applied to monitor CN⁻ in a cyanide-containing gold leach waste solution. The accuracy of the assay was evaluated by spiking a known amount of standard CN⁻ solution and calculating its recovery. The results were summarized in Table 1. The recoveries of different known amounts of CN⁻ added were obtained from 96.0% to 102.0% with satisfactory analytical precision (RSD ≤ 4.3%), which confirmed the feasibility and reliability of the present probe.

Table 1: Analytical results of CN⁻ in a cyanide-containing gold leach waste solution.

Added CN⁻ (μmol/L)
Found (μmol/L)
Recovery (%)
RSD () (%)

0
3.5

2.1

5.0
8.3
96.0
3.8

10.0
13.7
102.0
4.3

15.0
18.7
101.3
2.5

4. Conclusions

In summary, a water-soluble fluorescent probe C-GGH was successfully used for recognition of Cu²⁺ and CN⁻ based on the displacement strategy. The probe C-GGH displayed high selectivity and sensitivity for copper ions in 100% aqueous solution. The in situ formed C-GGH-Cu²⁺ can effectively respond to CN⁻ accompanied by the fluorescence recovery of the probe system. The probe C-GGH-Cu²⁺ allowed detection of CN⁻ in aqueous solution with a LOD of 0.017 μmol/L which is much lower than the maximum contaminant level (1.9 μmol/L) for cyanide in drinking water set by the WHO. And the probe C-GGH-Cu²⁺ exhibited high selectivity for CN⁻ over other common anions. The proposed method was also successfully applied to detect the contents of CN⁻ in a cyanide-containing gold leach waste solution, which implies its great potential for the practical applications.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful for the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. U1404215 and 61301038) for support.

References

J. Du, M. Hu, J. Fan, and X. Peng, “Fluorescent chemodosimeters using ‘mild’ chemical events for the detection of small anions and cations in biological and environmental media,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 4511–4535, 2012.

M. E. Moragues, R. Martínez-Máñez, and F. Sancenón, “Chromogenic and fluorogenic chemosensors and reagents for anions. A comprehensive review of the year 2009,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 2593–2643, 2011.

C. R. Nicoleti, L. G. Nandi, and V. G. Machado, “Chromogenic chemodosimeter for highly selective detection of cyanide in water and blood plasma based on Si-O cleavage in the micellar system,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 362–366, 2015.

F. Wang, L. Wang, X. Chen, and J. Yoon, “Recent progress in the development of fluorometric and colorimetric chemosensors for detection of cyanide ions,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 4312–4324, 2014.

M. Wenzel, J. R. Hiscock, and P. A. Gale, “Anion receptor chemistry: highlights from 2010,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 480–520, 2012.

Y. Yang, Q. Zhao, W. Feng, and F. Li, “Luminescent chemodosimeters for bioimaging,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 192–270, 2013.

J. Hamel, “A review of acute cyanide poisoning with a treatment update,” Critical Care Nurse, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 72–82, 2011.

S. Pramanik, V. Bhalla, and M. Kumar, “Hexaphenylbenzene-based fluorescent aggregates for ratiometric detection of cyanide ions at nanomolar level: set-reset memorized sequential logic device,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 5930–5939, 2014.

C. Giuriati, S. Cavalli, A. Gorni, D. Badocco, and P. Pastore, “Ion chromatographic determination of sulfide and cyanide in real matrices by using pulsed amperometric detection on a silver electrode,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1023, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2004.

J. Lv, Z. Zhang, J. Li, and L. Luo, “A micro-chemiluminescence determination of cyanide in whole blood,” Forensic Science International, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 15–19, 2005.

G. Qian, X. Li, and Z. Y. Wang, “Visible and near-infrared chemosensor for colorimetric and ratiometric detection of cyanide,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 522–530, 2009.

Z. Xu, X. Chen, H. N. Kim, and J. Yoon, “Sensors for the optical detection of cyanide ion,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 127–137, 2010.

T. Suzuki, A. Hioki, and M. Kurahashi, “Development of a method for estimating an accurate equivalence point in nickel titration of cyanide ions,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 476, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 2003.

M. D. F. B. Sousa, O. E. Godinho, and L. M. Aleixo, “An indirect voltammetric approach for the determination of cyanide at a chemically modified electrode,” Electroanalysis, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1095–1097, 1995.

L. D. Chen, X. U. Zou, and P. Bühlmann, “Cyanide-selective electrode based on Zn(II) tetraphenylporphyrin as ionophore,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 84, no. 21, pp. 9192–9198, 2012.

H.-I. Kang and H.-S. Shin, “Derivatization method of free cyanide including cyanogen chloride for the sensitive analysis of cyanide in chlorinated drinking water by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 975–981, 2015.

H. A. Schwertner, S. Valtier, and V. S. Bebarta, “Liquid chromatographic mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) determination of plasma hydroxocobalamin and cyanocobalamin concentrations after hydroxocobalamin antidote treatment for cyanide poisoning,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 905, pp. 10–16, 2012.

Y. Hao, W. Chen, L. Wang et al., “A naphthalimide-based azo colorimetric and ratiometric probe: synthesis and its application in rapid detection of cyanide anions,” Analytical Methods, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 2478–2483, 2014.

B. Aebli, C. Männel-Croisé, and F. Zelder, “Controlling binding dynamics of corrin-based chemosensors for cyanide,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 2516–2520, 2014.

T. N. Al-Sabha and N. M. Al-Karemy, “The use of 7,7′,8,8′-tetracyanoquinodimethane for the spectrophotometric determination of some primary amines application to real water samples,” Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 803767, 8 pages, 2013.

L. Van Tan, T. Quang Hieu, and N. Van Cuong, “Spectrophotometric determination of Cr(III) and Pb(II) using their complexes with 5,11,17,23-tetra[(2-ethyl acetoethoxyphenyl)(azo)phenyl]calix[4]arene,” Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry, vol. 2015, Article ID 860649, 7 pages, 2015.

N. Kumari, S. Jha, and S. Bhattacharya, “A chemodosimetric probe based on a conjugated oxidized bis-indolyl system for selective naked-eye sensing of cyanide ions in water,” Chemistry—An Asian Journal, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 2805–2812, 2013.

J. Jo, A. Olasz, C.-H. Chen, and D. Lee, “Interdigitated hydrogen bonds: electrophile activation for covalent capture and fluorescence turn-on detection of cyanide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 9, pp. 3620–3632, 2013.

P. Anzenbacher Jr., D. S. Tyson, K. Jursíková, and F. N. Castellano, “Luminescence lifetime-based sensor for cyanide and related anions,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 124, no. 22, pp. 6232–6233, 2002.

S. Saha, A. Ghosh, P. Mahato et al., “Specific recognition and sensing of CN⁻ in sodium cyanide solution,” Organic Letters, vol. 12, no. 15, pp. 3406–3409, 2010.

H.-C. Gee, C.-H. Lee, Y.-H. Jeong, and W.-D. Jang, “Highly sensitive and selective cyanide detection via Cu²⁺ complex ligand exchange,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 43, pp. 11963–11965, 2011.

H. S. Jung, J. H. Han, Z. H. Kim, C. Kang, and J. S. Kim, “Coumarin-Cu(II) ensemble-based cyanide sensing chemodosimeter,” Organic Letters, vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 5056–5059, 2011.

S. Das, S. Biswas, S. Mukherjee et al., “A cyanide selective off-on fluorescent chemosensor with in vivo imaging in 100% water: solid probe preferred over in situ generation,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 9656–9659, 2014.

T. G. Jo, Y. J. Na, J. J. Lee, M. M. Lee, S. Y. Lee, and C. Kim, “A multifunctional colorimetric chemosensor for cyanide and copper(II) ions,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 211, pp. 498–506, 2015.

Y. Hao, W. Chen, L. Wang et al., “A retrievable, water-soluble and biocompatible fluorescent probe for recognition of Cu(II) and sulfide based on a peptide receptor,” Talanta, vol. 143, pp. 307–314, 2015.

H. S. Jung, P. S. Kwon, J. W. Lee et al., “Coumarin-derived Cu²⁺-selective fluorescence sensor: synthesis, mechanisms, and applications in living cells,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 2008–2012, 2009.