Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 9538435, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9538435

Research Article

Chemometric-Assisted Spectrophotometric Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Ciprofloxacin and Doxycycline Hyclate in Pharmaceutical Formulations

Tadele Eticha, Getu Kahsay, Fitsum Asefa, Teklebrhan Hailu, Hailekiros Gebretsadik, Tesfamichael Gebretsadikan, and Boovizhikannan Thangabalan

School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Tadele Eticha; td.eticha@gmail.com

Received 18 October 2018; Revised 25 November 2018; Accepted 4 December 2018; Published 18 December 2018

Academic Editor: Antonio Ruiz Medina

Copyright © 2018 Tadele Eticha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Two chemometrics methods—principal component regression and partial least squares—were developed for simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in pharmaceutical dosage forms without any pretreatment. The UV spectra of both drugs were recorded at concentrations within their linear ranges between 200 and 400 nm with the intervals λ = 2 nm at 100 wavelengths in distilled water. Beer’s law was obeyed for both drugs in the concentration ranges of 1–10 μg/mL for ciprofloxacin and 5–25 μg/mL for doxycycline hyclate. Two sets of standard mixtures, 25 as a calibration set and 9 as a validation set, were prepared. The calibration models were evaluated by cross-validation and external validation over synthetic mixtures. The optimized models were successfully applied for chemometric analysis of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in synthetic and pharmaceutical mixtures with satisfactory accuracy (recovery values from 97.50% to 101.87%) and precision (RSD < 2%).

1. Introduction

Ciprofloxacin (CIP), chemically 1-cyclopropyl-6-fluoro-4-oxo-7-(piperazin-1-yl)-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid, belongs to the class of the fluoroquinolone antibiotics [1]. It is used to treat bacterial infections such as gastrointestinal, Intra-abdominal, skin, respiratory tract, urinary tract, and bone and joint infections, among others [2]. Doxycycline (DOX), chemically (4S,4aR,5S,5aR,6R,12aS)-4-(Dimethylamino)-3,5,10,12,12a-pentahydroxy-6-methyl-1,11-dioxo-1,4,4a,5,5a,6,11,12a-octahydrotetracene-2-carboxamide, is an antibiotic which belongs to the group of tetracyclines [1]. It is used to treat pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic prostatitis, sinusitis, acne, and rickettsial infections in addition to the general indications for all members of the tetracycline antibiotics group [2].

Both ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate are official in the British and United States Pharmacopoeia, and their official method of assay is high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [1, 3]. Several analytical methods such as spectrophotometry [4, 5], fluorimetry [6], ultra-performance liquid chromatographic [7], HPLC [8], high-performance thin-layer chromatography [9], high-performance capillary electrophoresis [10], and capillary electrophoresis [11] have been reported for the determination of ciprofloxacin while spectrophotometry [12, 13] and HPLC [14, 15] are for the determination of doxycycline hyclate alone or in combination with other medicines.

In recent years, the application of chemometrics, particularly multivariate calibration methods, is playing a crucial role in the multicomponent analysis of pharmaceutical mixtures [16]. Multivariate calibration methods such as PCR and PLS applied to spectral data are being increasingly used for instrumental methods without separation techniques [17, 18]. Multivariate calibration of PCR and PLS have been applied for simultaneous UV-Vis spectrophotometric determination of ciprofloxacin and ornidazole [19], ciprofloxacin and tinidazole [20], ambroxol and doxycycline [21], and β-lactam antibiotic binary mixtures [22] in pharmaceutical formulations.

The purpose of this study was to introduce alternative analytical procedures based on the chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous determination of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in laboratory-prepared synthetic and pharmaceutical mixtures. Using an apparatus at a time for the simultaneous determination of both drugs using water as a solvent is a great benefit for developing nations because of the efficient use of the instrument and cheap solvent. Therefore, these analytical methods might be helpful specifically in developing countries where resource is limited.

2. Experimental

2.1. Apparatus and Software

Spectrophotometric measurements were performed on a double-beam UV-VIS spectrometer (PG Instruments, Lutterworth, England), equipped with 1 cm matched quartz cells, connected to a computer loaded with UV-Win PC software. All absorption spectra were saved and subsequently exported UV-Win software to Microsoft Excel program for statistical manipulation. Minitab 7.1 version software was employed to determine concentrations of combinations for calibration and validation sets while Unscrambler® X 10.5 version was used for PCR and PLS model development and data analysis.

2.2. Reagents and Samples

Pharmaceutical grade ciprofloxacin and doxycycline were obtained from Addis Pharmaceutical Factory (Adigrat, Ethiopia). Distilled water was used throughout the work. Commercial samples, ciprofloxacin tablets labeled to contain 500 mg (Serviflox, Sandoz and Zindolin, Remedica) and doxycycline hyclate labeled to contain 100 mg capsules (Doxicad, Cadila), and tablets (Remycin, Remedica), were purchased from the local pharmacies in Mekelle, Ethiopia.

2.3. One-Component Calibration

This was examined in the concentration range of 1–10 μg/mL for ciprofloxacin and 5–25 μg/mL for doxycycline hyclate. Absorbance values were recorded at λmax of each drug (272 nm for CIP and 275 nm for DOX) against distilled water as blank. Linear dynamic range for each drug was studied by least square linear regression of concentration and the corresponding absorbance.

2.4. Preparation of Stock and Working Standard Solutions

Accurately weighed and transferred (10 mg) either of the standard drugs into 100 mL volumetric flask was dissolved in about 80 mL of distilled water and diluted to volume with the same solution. Suitable aliquots of the stock solutions were diluted with the solvent to obtain the appropriate working standard solutions according to the linear calibration range for each drug.

2.5. Construction of Calibration and Validation Sets

The calibration and validation mixtures were prepared by combining working standard solutions of CIP and DOX in different ratios in their concentration linearity ranges. The concentrations of mixtures were determined by general factorial design (2 factors at 5 level of each factor) for calibration set and (2 factors at 3 level of each factor) for validation set. A total set of 25 and 9 calibration (Table 1) and validation (Table 2) mixtures were independently prepared, respectively. The absorption spectra of all mixtures were recorded over the range 200–400 nm with 2 nm interval.

Table 1: Composition of calibration set.

Mix. no.
CIP (μg/mL)
DOX (μg/mL)

1
1
15

2
2
7

3
4
9

4
1
7

5
2
5

6
4
5

7
6
5

8
6
12

9
8
7

10
4
15

11
8
5

12
4
12

13
4
7

14
1
12

15
8
15

16
6
15

17
1
5

18
8
12

19
2
9

20
1
9

21
2
15

22
2
12

23
6
9

24
8
9

25
6
7

Table 2: Composition of validation set and predicted results obtained in synthetic mixtures by PCR and PLS methods.

CIP
DOX
PCR
PLS

CIP
DOX
CIP
DOX

Actual conc. (μg/mL)
Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery
Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery
Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery
Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery

5
13
4.99
99.72
12.96
99.69
4.99
99.73
12.96
99.66

7
10
7.04
100.60
10.00
100.00
7.04
100.61
10.01
100.05

5
7
5.09
101.75
7.00
100.00
5.09
101.76
7.00
100.00

7
7
7.18
102.60
7.09
101.29
7.18
102.61
7.09
101.30

7
13
7.03
100.50
13.23
101.77
7.04
100.52
13.23
101.79

5
10
4.95
98.95
9.90
99.00
4.95
98.96
9.90
99.00

3
7
2.72
90.52
6.68
95.43
2.72
90.55
6.68
95.40

3
13
2.88
95.98
12.70
97.69
2.88
96.00
12.70
97.66

3
10
2.79
92.88
9.65
96.50
2.79
92.89
9.65
96.49

R²
0.998
0.994
0.998
0.994

Intercept
0.376
0.210
0.379
0.210

Slope
0.932
0.988
0.931
0.988

RMSECV
0.278
0.794
0.283
0.824

RMSEP
0.142
0.219
0.143
0.208

R², correlation coefficient; RMSECV, root-mean-square error of cross-validation; RMSEP, root-mean-square error of prediction.

2.6. Analysis of the Marketed Formulations

Twenty tablets or capsules were accurately weighed and finely powdered. Tablet or capsule powder equivalent to ciprofloxacin (100 mg) and doxycycline hyclate (150 mg) were accurately weighed and transferred into 100 mL volumetric flask, and 50 mL of distilled water was added. The solution was well shaken and ultrasonicated for 15 min. Then, the solution was filtrated in a 100 mL volumetric flask through a Whatman filter paper # 42 filter paper. The residue was washed three times with 10 mL water, and the volume was completed to 100 mL with water. Suitable aliquots of the stock solutions were mixed and diluted with the solvent to obtain the appropriate working sample solution for UV measurements at the specified range.

Synthetic mixture was used for the combination of working standard solutions while pharmaceutical mixture referred to the combination of sample solutions throughout this work.

2.7. Accuracy Study

The accuracy of the method was performed at three levels 80, 100, and 120% of the working concentration of sample. Calculated amounts of standard solution of CIP and DOX were spiked into sample solution, and the resulting solutions were scanned in the range of 200–400 nm. The accuracy of the method was evaluated as the percent recovery of the added amounts of the standard to the previously analyzed sample. The developed method was validated according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Multivariate Calibration Analysis

The UV absorption spectra of ciprofloxacin, doxycycline hyclate, and their mixture are given in Figure 1. The calibration and prediction sets were designed in 25 and 9 laboratory-made mixtures (Tables 1 and 2) as described in Section 2.5. The absorbance spectra which showed a significant overlap were recorded between 200 and 400 nm in the intervals as Δλ = 2 nm at 100 wavelengths. Multivariate calibrations such as PCR and PLS are therefore required for such analysis due to presence of interference.

Figure 1: UV absorption spectra of ciprofloxacin, doxycycline hyclate, and the mixture.

A number of laboratory synthetic mixtures (Table 2) were subjected to the PCR and PLS analysis to prove the suitability of the calibration model for determination of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in the pharmaceutical sample solutions. The model was built with the help of the Unscrambler software. The findings were satisfactory as the concentrations of each drug predicted by the model are close to the actual concentrations.

The predictive abilities of the models were evaluated by root-mean-square error of cross-validation (RMSECV), root-mean-square error of prediction (RMSEP), and correlation coefficient (r²) (Table 2). With cross-validation, the same calibration set samples were used for both model estimation and testing. Leave-one-out cross-validation, leaving out one sample at a time, was employed to validate the PCR and PLS models in model development. The models were also validated by prediction of the concentration of analytes in separate validation set which was not used in the model development (Table 2). The RMSEP generated from validation set is the estimated prediction error that accurately reflects all sources of variability in the calibration method. To validate the model, both RMSECV and RMSEP must be as low as possible for a model [23]. Reasonable correlation coefficient was obtained for each drug in the validation set samples by PCR- and PLS-optimized models, demonstrating good predictive abilities of the models.

3.2. Accuracy

The reliability and validity of the proposed method were examined by the standard addition technique at 80%, 100%, and 120% of the test concentration. The mixtures were analyzed, and the percent recoveries ranged from 97.50% to 101.87% (Table 3). These findings confirmed that the excipients in pharmaceutical products do not interfere with the determination of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate.

Table 3: Accuracy data of CIP and DOX by PCR and PLS models ().

Mix.
Component
Level (%)
Amount taken (μg/mL)
PCR
PLS

Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery
% RSD
Predicted (μg/mL)
% recovery
% RSD

Mix. 1
CIP tablet
80
3.2
3.12
97.50
0.524
3.13
97.81
0.662

100
4
3.91
97.75
0.869
3.90
97.50
0.794

120
4.8
4.83
100.63
0.979
4.82
100.42
1.021

DOX capsule
80
8
17.71
98.39
0.790
17.71
98.39
0.783

100
10
20.23
101.15
0.941
20.24
101.20
0.933

120
12
21.73
98.77
0.834
21.74
98.82
0.829

Mix. 2
CIP tablet
80
3.2
3.26
101.87
1.261
3.24
101.25
1.112

100
4
3.93
98.25
0.634
3.92
98.00
0.751

120
4.8
4.79
99.79
0.740
4.78
99.58
0.641

DOX tablet
80
8
17.82
99.00
1.111
17.83
99.06
1.101

100
10
20.19
100.95
0.799
20.2
101.00
0.791

120
12
21.77
98.95
0.372
21.79
99.05
0.368

Precision of the developed method was examined as intra- and interday precisions. Six determinations of the drug solution were performed for three consecutive days for the evaluation of intermediate precision. The percent relative standard deviations of both precisions were <2%, revealing the good precision of the method.

3.3. Analysis of Real Samples

The proposed methods were applied for the assay of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in laboratory prepared mixtures of their pharmaceutical preparations. The assay results are shown in Table 4. The findings were found to be in a good agreement with the concentration taken for the formulations. This revealed that the matrices and/or excipients did not interfere with the quantifications.

Table 4: Assay results of CIP and DOX in laboratory-prepared commercial mixtures by developed PCR and PLS methods ().

Mix.
Dosage form
Component
Actual conc. (μg/mL)
PCR
PLS

Predicted (μg/mL ± SD)
% recovery
Predicted (μg/mL ± SD)
% recovery

Mix. 1
Tablet
CIP
8
7.94 ± 0.064
99.19
7.94 ± 0.065
99.25

Capsule
DOX
12
12.13 ± 0.548
101.08
12.13 ± 0.560
101.08

Mix 2
Tablet
CIP
8
7.90 ± 0.039
98.75
7.91 ± 0.041
98.81

Tablet
DOX
12
11.74 ± 0.974
97.79
11.74 ± 0.041
97.79

The developed techniques are much easier than HPLC methods stipulated in pharmacopeias [1, 3] and other existing analytical methods [7, 8, 14, 15]. The methods employed distilled water as a solvent, and the procedures do not involve any sample pretreatment.

4. Conclusion

The developed UV spectrophotometric methods in combination with PCR and PLS can be used for the simultaneous determination of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline hyclate in laboratory-prepared binary mixtures of their either pure powder forms or pharmaceutical preparations. The proposed techniques do not need any sample pretreatment, and they are rapid, precise, and accurate. Therefore, these methods could be suitable for quality-control laboratories especially in developing nations, where resource is limited.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tewodros Asmare and Birhan Gebru for their technical support in the laboratory.

References

British Pharmacopoeia Commission, British Pharmacopoeia, Renouf Publishing Company Limited, London, UK, 2013.

B. G. Wells, J. T. DiPiro, T. L. Schwinghammer, and C. W. Hamilton, Pharmacotherapy Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York City, NY, USA, 6th edition, 2006.

United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, United States Pharmacopeia, United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, Rockville, MD, USA, 2007.

A. C. Igboasoiyi, E. E. Attih, S. I. Ofoefule, E. D. Umoh, and O. C. Udoh, “Spectrophotometric determination of ciprofloxacin using charge-transfer complexation technique,” International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 177–182, 2014.

R. S. Nijhu, Y. M. Jhanker, and K. B. Sutradhar, “Development of an assay method for simultaneous determination of ciprofloxacin and naproxen by UV spectrophotometric method,” Stamford Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 84–90, 2011.

C. J. Zhou, N. Liu, and Y. E. Guo, “Fluometric determination of the content of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride ointments,” Yauwu Fenxi Zazhi, vol. 18, pp. 200-201, 1998.

G. J. Chavan, S. R. Charya, I. N. Baris, S. D. Patil, and S. B. Patil, “Development and validated RP-UPLC method for simultaneous estimation of ciprofloxacin HCl, doxycycline and phenazopyridine HCl in bulk and tablet dosage form,” American Journal of PharmTech Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2249–3387, 2013.

N. M. Kassab, K. A. Singh, E. R. M. KedorHackmam, and M. I. R. M. Santoro, “Quantitative determination of ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in pharmaceutical preparations by high performance liquid chromatography,” Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 507–513, 2005.

J. Krzek, U. Hubicka, and J. Szczepańiczyk, “High performance thin-layer chromatography with densitometry for the determination of ciprofloxacin and impurities in drugs,” Journal of AOAC International, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1530–1536, 2005.

C. Yin and Y. T. Wu, “Determination of four quinolones by high performance capillary electrophoresis,” Yauwu Fenxi Zazhi, vol. 17, pp. 371–373, 1997.

K. D. Altria and Y. L. Chanter, “Validation of capillary electrophoresis method for the determination of quinolone antibiotic and its related impurities,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 652, no. 2, pp. 459–463, 1993.

P. J. Ramesh, K. Basavaiah, M. R. Divya, N. Rajendraprasad, and K. B. Vinay, “Titrimetric and spectrophotometric determination of doxycycline hyclate using bromate-bromide, methyl orange and indigo carmine,” Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quartely, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2010.

K. K. Chakravarthy, V. Darak, M. D. Arshad, and S. A. Bharath, “Development and validation of simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of doxycycline and tinidazole in tablet dosage forms,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 85–90, 2011.

U. A. Deokate, R. B. Nawale, and M. S. Salvi, “Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of doxycycline hyclate and tinidazole in bulk and tablet dosage forms,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 7666–7671, 2013.

S. M. Snezana, Z. M. Gordana, D. Kostic, D. Naskovic-Djokic, B. Arsic, and I. Rasic, “A rapid and reliable determination of doxycycline hyclate by HPLC with UV detection in pharmaceutical samples,” Journal of Serbian Chemical Society, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 665–671, 2008.

M. De Luca, F. Oliverio, G. Ioele, and G. Ragno, “Multivariate calibration techniques applied to derivative spectroscopy data for the analysis of pharmaceutical mixtures,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2009.

A. Rohman, “Application of FTIR spectroscopy for quality control in pharmaceutical products: a review,” Indonesian Journal of Pharmacy, vol. 23, pp. 1–8, 2012.

A. El-Gindy, S. Emara, and A. Mostafa, “Application and validation of chemometrics-assisted spectrophotometry and liquid chromatography for the simultaneous determination of six-component pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 421–430, 2006.

S. V. Gandhi, D. Abhilash, Waghmare, Y. S. Nandwani, and A. S. Mutha, “Chemometrics-assisted UV spectrophotometric method for determination of ciprofloxacin and ornidazole in pharmaceutical formulation,” ARC Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2017.

S. V. Gandhi and D. M. Patil, “Validation and application of chemometrics–assisted UV spectrophotometric method for determination of ciprofloxacin and tinidazole in pharmaceutical formulation,” International Journal of Universal Pharmacy and Bio Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 236–245, 2017.

G. M. Hadad, A. El-Gindy, and W. M. M. Mahmoud, “HPLC and chemometrics-assisted UV-spectroscopy methods for the simultaneous determination of ambroxol and doxycycline in capsule,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 655–663, 2008.

A. E. I. Mohamed, H. Salem, and E. Maher, “Chemometrics-assisted spectrophotometric determination of certain β-lactam antibiotics combinations,” Thai Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 31, pp. 9–27, 2007.

P. Gemperline, Practical Guide to Chemometrics, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.