Journal of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical PhysicsVolume 2012 (2012), Article ID 683830, 6 pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/683830

Research Article

Uniformly Immobilizing Gold Nanorods on a Glass Substrate

Hadas Weinrib, Amihai Meiri, Hamootal Duadi, and Dror Fixler

Faculty of Engineering and The Institute of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel

Received 10 February 2012; Revised 5 April 2012; Accepted 5 April 2012

Academic Editor: Rachela Popovtzer

Copyright © 2012 Hadas Weinrib et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The goal of this paper is to immobilize gold nanoparticles uniformly on a glass substrate. In order to attach gold-nanorods (GNRs) to an area of a few squared microns surface of glass substrate without preliminary coating of the GNR, 3-(Mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane molecules were used as linker while using different methods. These methods included placing the glass slide and the GNR (1) inside a tube without any motion; (2) inside a shaker; (3) in a fan setup. The fan setup included a tube containing the GNR solution and the glass slide at a vertical position, when the fan blows above the tube, producing turbulations in the liquid. Each method was evaluated according to the density and the homogeneousness of the GNR monolayer on the surface. The uniformity of the monolayer was demonstrated using AFM images of different areas on the slides, and the effectiveness of the protocol was demonstrated by calculating the average density of the GNR on the surface using image processing and analysis software. It was found that while both the shaker and the fan setups improved the monolayer density, the fan setup improved the density by a factor of more than two than the density found using the shaker.

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles play a significant role in an increasing number of researches and variety of applications. Recently, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have gained popularity, and they serve as promising agents due to their favorable optical properties, such as an enhanced absorption cross-section [1] and scattering properties [2], biocompatibility [3], and well-developed bioconjugation protocols [4]. The increment in the number of applications using GNP has led to an ongoing demand for developing new techniques for immobilization of GNP to the substrate surface. Immobilization of GNP to substrates is required due to their applicability in various fields, among them: optical sensing using effects like surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), using nanoparticles as immobilizers for bio-molecules, electron transfer enhancement, and labeling of biomolecules [5, 6].

Immobilization of the particles on the surface can be achieved by using various methods, which may be divided into two groups: physical attachment [7, 8] which is mainly used to obtain a multilayer of particles or a thin film, and chemical attachment [9, 10], which demands plating the substrate with linker molecules and is used to obtain a high-quality monolayer or structure of organized layers. While some of the chemical attachment methods take advantage of the ionic nature of the gold as well as its affinity toward thiol, others require the use of linker molecules [5].

Most of the common methods for chemical attachment between GNP and a substrate use self-assembled monolayers that contain organic groups, especially amine and thiol, while the use of charged polymer as a linker medium serves as an alternative [11].

The principle of using linker molecules is based on the ability of these molecules to self-arrange to what is called a self-assembled monolayer. The linker molecules are in fact bifunctional molecules where one end binds to the substrate, and the other is ready to bind to gold nanoparticles.

Previous studies [12–15] have shown that gold colloids can be self-assembled from solution onto a functionalized glass surface. The self-assembled monolayer is stabilized by attractive electrostatic interactions. Aminopropyltrimethoxy silane (APTMS or APS) has been commonly used to obtain amine-functionalised nonmetal substrate surface for the attachment of gold colloidal nanoparticles [10, 12, 14, 15]. This utilization has been used for a variance of purposes, mainly for application using SPR [12, 14, 15] and SERS effects [10, 13].

Usually, utilization of this method would be successful with gold nanospheres (GNSs) rather than gold nanorods (GNRs) because GNSs are usually produced in a negatively charged citrate medium, while GNR are usually produced using a positively charged CTAB medium [16].

The positive charge of the top amine group of APTMS is a more suitable instrument in attracting the negatively charged GNS. Although one could stripe the solvent and achieve natural GNP [17], other options like negatively charged coupling agents are preferable due to the difficulty in the total removal of all the remnants of the medium. Among these agents, we can state negatively charged polymer [11] or thiol groups.

Using thiol molecules to link GNP to substrates has been extensively studied not only because of their unique physical and chemical properties but also because of their easy preparation and good performance.

S–H head groups are used on noble metal substrates due to the strong affinity of sulfur in these metals (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Chemical attachment between S–H and gold (Au): on the left the original thiol moleculse and on the right the gold particles chemicaly bounded to the thiol molecules.

The sulfur gold interaction is semicovalent and has a strength of approximately 45 kcal/mol. In addition, gold is an inert and biocompatible material that can withstand harsh chemical cleaning treatments. These traits make thiol molecules attractive candidates for a wide range of applications [18–20]. Among these applications are technologies for the biosensor industry [21] and building of nanostructures for fabrication of nanodevices [9].

In most cases, thiol molecules are used as linkers for metal-metal binding, by using dithiol [22–25], or as a GNP coating in order to prevent self-aggregation [24]. However, thiol molecules could be useful for binding metal to other substrates such as glass. Glass-metal binding is accomplished by using molecules with thiol tail groups and head groups, which are substrate-specific. In case of a glass substrate, an optional functional group is silane [26].

Upon working with GNR, a common problem of aggregation arise as GNR tend to self-aggregate in the solution or on the surface causing a disorder in the layer on the surface. The prevalent solution is an additional step of preliminary coating the GNR by dithiols.

To our knowledge, there are no simple routine methods for coating uniformly a relatively wide area with high-quality, densely packed monolayer of GNR without preliminary coating the GNR. In this work, we used thiosilanes as bifunctional molecules in order to attach the GNR to a glass substrate when silane head groups are attached to the glass substrate and the GNR are chemically bound to the thiol tail groups as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Scheme of the attachment between the GNR and the glass substrate by silane head and thiol tail.

In order to simplify the process and avoid preliminary coating of the GNR, we used a shaker or a central processing unit (CPU) fan to prevent self aggregation in the solution and on the substrate and to increase the probability of a single GNR to chemically bound to linker molecules on the glass, what improves the quality of the monolayer.

2. Materials and Methods

GNRs were synthesized using the seed-mediated growth method [21]. Their size, shape, and uniformity were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and the resultant shape was 25 nm 65 nm, with a narrow size distribution (10%) [27] (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

Figure 3: TEM image of gold nanorods and corresponding absorption spectrum.

3-(Mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Cover glass slides (2.2 cm × 1.2 cm) with a diameter of 0.13–0.17 mm were cleaned in a piranha solution (3 : 1 (v/v) H₂SO₄/H₂O₂) that causes vigorous oxidation for 90 min.

A special glass tube was custom produced by us (Figure 4). The tube was composed of a flat part that enables vertical positioning of the slide and a cylindrical part for possible future use of a magnetic stirrer. Vertical positioning of the glass slide is important for obtaining homogeneous binding of the GNR to the slide.

Figure 4: Digital image of the custom-made tube.

After cleaning, the piranha was removed, and the slides were rinsed repeatedly a few times with water. Subsequently, the slides were rinsed repeatedly with ethanol and then incubated in thiosilane solution—an MPTMS 1% ethanol solution for 2.5 hours. The slides were double-rinsed with ethanol and sonicated for 10 min after each rinse. Prior to further modification, the slides were dried at 70°C for 5 minutes. AFM measurements and imaging were carried out using a ICON scanning probe microscope (Bruker AXS, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). All images were obtained using the tapping mode with a single TESP silicon probe (force constant of 20–80 N/m, Bruker, Camarillo, CA, USA). The resonance frequency of this cantilever was approximately 307–375 kHz. The scan angle was maintained at 0 degrees, and the images were captured in the retrace direction with a scan rate of 1.5 Hz (resp. for the scan size was 3000 × 3000 nm). The aspect ratio was 1 : 1, and image resolution was 1024 samples/line. Analysis of the image was done using the NanoScope software.

The data was processed using ImageJ software. ImageJ (image processing and analysis) is a public domain, Java-based image processing program developed at the National Institutes of Health [28].

3. Results and Discussion

Our first goal was to create a monolayer of the GNR.

When rinsing the glass vertically in the GNR solution without any intervention produced no attachment to the glass was seen. In order to improve the results, different manipulations were tried. First, the slides were induced in the GNR colloid for 2 hours in a shaker in order to have maximal contact of the GNR with the surface and try to avoid self-aggregation. Afterwards, the slides were rinsed in ethanol, sonicated for 5 min, and dried at 70°C for 5 minutes. The results can be seen in Figures 7(a)–7(c).

Placing the tube in a shaker improved the attachment of the GNR to the glass, but further improvement was required.

Next, we sought to improve the density, uniformity, and homogeneousness of the monolayer without adding steps of preliminary process such us prior coating of the GNR.

In order to improve the quality of the monolayer, the shaker was replaced by a CPU fan. The fan was placed on top of the tube that contained the slides in the GNR solution. The intensity of the blow was controlled by the power supplier as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: The setup of the system including a CPU fan of top of the tube contains the glass slide inside the GNR solution.

Both methods, shaker and fan, despite their difference, are based on the assumption that the motion of the GNR solution increases the probability of a single GNR to chemically bound to linker molecules on the glass. A scheme of movement of the GNR in the fan setup is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Scheme of dispersion of the GNR in the fan setup.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 7: AFM images of the GNR on the glass slides. (a)–(c) are images of different areas of a slide that was coated using a shaker; (d)–(f) are images of different areas of a slide that was coated using a CPU fan.

In order to compare the density of the monolayer obtained by using the different methods, AFM images were taken. To confirm the uniformity of the monolayer, images from different areas of the slide were taken for every sample.

While the use of a shaker produced a relatively uniform monolayer (see Figures 7(a)–7(c)), the introduction of the fan to the protocol resulted in a denser layers can be seen in Figures 7(d)–7(f).

In order to quantify the improvement in density between the methods we used a Java image processing program called ImageJ. A particle analysis facility was used on the images, which occupied an area of 2 μm × 2 μm on the glass slide. We converted the images into 8-bit images and adjusted the lower threshold to 90, while the upper threshold was kept at 255. This choice of threshold ensured the exclusion of the surface and the binding layer from the count.

The improvement in the quality of the monolayer is clearly demonstrated where the use of the fan increased the particle density significantly to particles per frame (2 μm × 2 μm) in comparison to particles per frame for the shaker.

4. Conclusions

The results reported in this work indicate that using thiosilane molecules combined with utilization of a fan in the setup applies a uniform high-quality monolayer of GNR on a few micron squared area of glass substrate, which is a relatively wide field.

In order to improve the density and the homogeneousness of GNR monolayer and yet avoid preliminary coating of the GNR, two methods were tested. In the first method, the slides were rinsed in the GNR solution and deposited in a shaker. In the second method, the slides were placed in the setup blown with a fan from above. Both methods improved the attachment of the GNR to the glass, but the latter produced significantly better results by increasing the quality of the monolayer. The AFM images clearly demonstrate that the density of the monolayer using the fan is higher than using a shaker. In addition, the monolayer that was obtained was denser than the one that was achieved by Niidome et al. [11] using a negatively charged polymer. Comparison between AFM images of random different areas of the slide indicates the uniformity of the monolayer rather than one image of smaller area.

As was demonstrated, using the fan setup improved the quality of the GNR monolayer on the glass. This suggested that the method enables simplifying the process of attaching GNR to glass substrate. Such a process may serve as a first step towards the development of a novel super resolution method based on GNR attached to an observed object.

References

M. A. El-Sayed, “Some interesting properties of metals confined in time and nanometer space of different shapes,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 257–264, 2001.

P. K. Jain, K. S. Lee, I. H. El-Sayed, and M. A. El-Sayed, “Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, no. 14, pp. 7238–7248, 2006.

E. E. Connor, J. Mwamuka, A. Gole, C. J. Murphy, and M. D. Wyatt, “Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity,” Small, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 325–327, 2005.

S. Kumar, J. Aaron, and K. Sokolov, “Directional conjugation of antibodies to nanoparticles for synthesis of multiplexed optical contrast agents with both delivery and targeting moieties,” Nature Protocols, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 314–320, 2008.

X. Luo, A. Morrin, A. J. Killard, and M. R. Smyth, “Application of nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors and biosensors,” Electroanalysis, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2006.

R. Ankri, A. Meiri, S. I. Lau, M. Motiei, R. Popovtzer, and D. Fixler, “Surface plasmon resonance coupling and diffusion reflection measurements for real-time cancer detection,” Journal of Biophotonics. In press

X. Xu, M. Stevens, and M. B. Cortie, “In situ precipitation of gold nanoparticles onto glass for potential architectural applications,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2259–2266, 2004.

L. Wang, W. Mao, D. Ni, J. Di, Y. Wu, and Y. Tu, “Direct electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles onto indium/tin oxide film coated glass and its application for electrochemical biosensor,” Electrochemistry Communications, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 673–676, 2008.

H. X. He, H. Zhang, Q. G. Li, T. Zhu, S. F. Y. Li, and Z. F. Liu, “Fabrication of designed architectures of Au nanoparticles on solid substrate with printed self-assembled monolayers as templates,” Langmuir, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 3846–3851, 2000.

O. Seitz, M. M. Chehimi, E. Cabet-Deliry et al., “Preparation and characterisation of gold nanoparticle assemblies on silanised glass plates,” Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 218, no. 1–3, pp. 225–239, 2003.

Y. Niidome, H. Takahashi, S. Urakawa, K. Nishioka, and S. Yamada, “Immobilization of gold nanorods on the glass substrate by the electrostatic interactions for localized plasmon sensing,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 454–455, 2004.

N. Nath and A. Chilkoti, “Label-free biosensing by surface plasmon resonance of nanoparticles on glass: optimization of nanoparticle size,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 76, no. 18, pp. 5370–5378, 2004.

E. J. Bjerneld, F. Svedberg, and M. Käll, “Laser induced growth and deposition of noble-metal nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman scattering,” Nano Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 593–596, 2003.

N. Nath and A. Chilkoti, “A colorimetric gold nanoparticle sensor to interrogate biomolecular interactions in real time on a surface,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 504–509, 2002.

T. Okamoto, I. Yamaguchi, and T. Kobayashi, “Local plasmon sensor with gold colloid monolayers deposited upon glass substrates,” Optics Letters, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 372–374, 2000.

J. Pérez-Juste, I. Pastoriza-Santos, L. M. Liz-Marzán, and P. Mulvaney, “Gold nanorods: synthesis, characterization and applications,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 249, no. 17-18, pp. 1870–1901, 2005.

X. Xu, T. H. Gibbons, and M. B. Cortie, “Spectrally-selective gold nanorod coatings for window glass,” Gold Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 156–165, 2006.

G. Schmid, S. Peschel, and T. Sawitowski, “Two-dimensional arrangements of gold clusters and gold colloids on various surfaces,” Zeitschrift fur Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, vol. 623, no. 5, pp. 719–723, 1997.

T. Ohgi, H. Y. Sheng, and H. Nejoh, “Au particle deposition onto self-assembled monolayers of thiol and dithiol molecules,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 130-132, pp. 919–924, 1998.

A. Doron, E. Joselevich, A. Schlittner, and I. Willner, “AFM characterization of the structure of Au-colloid monolayers and their chemical etching,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 340, no. 1, pp. 183–188, 1999.

B. Nikoobakht and M. A. El-Sayed, “Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1957–1962, 2003.

E. Hutter, S. Cha, J. F. Liu et al., “Role of substrate metal in gold nanoparticle enhanced surface plasmon resonance imaging,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2000.

M. D. Musick, C. D. Keating, L. A. Lyon et al., “Metal films prepared by stepwise assembly. 2. Construction and characterization of colloidal Au and Ag multilayers,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2869–2881, 2000.

C. N. R. Rao, G. U. Kulkarni, P. J. Thomas, and P. P. Edwards, “Metal nanoparticles and their assemblies,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 27–35, 2000.

Z. M. Qi, I. Honma, M. Ichihara, and H. Zhou, “Layer-by-layer fabrication and characterization of gold-nanoparticle/ myoglobin nanocomposite films,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 377–386, 2006.

Y. Wang, L. Q. Chen, Y. F. Li, X. J. Zhao, L. Peng, and C. Z. Huang, “A one-pot strategy for biomimetic synthesis and self-assembly of gold nanoparticles,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 30, Article ID 305601, 2010.

R. Ankri, V. Peretz, M. Motiei, R. Popovtzer, and D. Fixler, “A new method for cancer detection based on diffusion reflection measurements of targeted gold nanorods,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 7, pp. 449–455, 2012.

T. J. Collins, “ImageJ for microscopy,” BioTechniques, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2007.