Journal of Chemistry

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 628253, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/628253

Research Article

A New Spectrophotometric Reagent for Fe(III): 2-(2,3-Dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) Hydrozinecarbothiamide and Its Application in Real Samples

Mahboubeh Saeidi, Reihaneh Aboutalebi, and Ali Darehkordi

Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

Received 19 February 2012; Revised 2 June 2012; Accepted 17 June 2012

Academic Editor: Dimosthenis L. Giokas

Copyright © 2013 Mahboubeh Saeidi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A new reagent 2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide has been synthesized and used for developing a simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of Fe(III) which is based on a 2 : 1 complex formation between Fe(III) and new reagent in aqueous solution. The method is optimized in terms of the pH value, amount of reagent required, ionic strength, and stability of the complex, sensitivity, linearity, and tolerance limits of various foreign ions. The complex is a red-brown chelate, with  nm at pH = 3 ( Lmol⁻¹cm⁻¹). The ionic strength was kept constant at 0.02 by adding appropriate amounts of NaCl solution. The calibration curve is linear in the concentration range from 0.27–33.50 μgmL⁻¹. The effects of foreign ions on the determination of Fe(III) were investigated in order to assess the selectivity of the method. The method was applied in determination of Fe(III) in tap water, cow milk, and human serum.

1. Introduction

Iron is the most important transition element involved in living system, being vital to both plants and animals. Its versatility is unique. It is at the active center of molecules responsible for oxygen transport and electron transport and is found in such diverse metalloenzyme as nitrogenase, various oxidases, hydrogenases, reductases, dehydrogenases, deoxygenases, and dehydrases. Iron is involved in enormous range of function and the whole range of life forms, from bacteria to man [1, 2]. Determination of oxidation state of iron in aquatic system is very important for environmental and biological studies because of the influence of the chemical forms on the bioavailability of iron [3]. Owing to simplicity, cheapness, and rapidity, UV-Visible spectrophotometric methods have been developed for the determination of metal ions. It involves using a number of chromogenic reagents for this purpose. Ferric ion is the most stable state of iron in the solutions; hence the determination of iron is generally demonstrated on Fe(III) contents. In recent years, numerous chromogenic reagents, which are capable to form high stable complexes with Fe(III) ion, have been widely used for the determination of iron contents in numerous complicated matrices [4].

There are many spectrophotometric methods for the determination of iron [5]. Several techniques, such as spectrophotometry [6–9], atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [3, 7, 10–12], inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) [13, 14], ICP-mass spectrometry (MS) [15–17], cathodic or anodic stripping voltammetry [18, 19], chromatography [20, 21], cloud point extraction (CPE) [22–26], and spectroscopic sensors [27], have been reported for the determination of Fe.

In this study, 2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide is a new ligand used for spectrophotometric determination of Fe(III) ion. The procedure was applied to the determination of iron in tap water, cow milk, and human serum.

2. Experimental

Absorbance was measured and absorption spectra were recorded using a Cary 100 model Varian UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Australia) equipped with a quartz cell of 10 mm path length. pH measurement was made with 827 pH lab Metrohm pH meter (Switzerland). IR spectra were obtained on a Matson 1000, FT-IR spectrometer (USA). Peaks are reported in wave numbers (cm⁻¹). All NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker model DRX-500 AVANCE (¹H : 500 MHz) (¹³C : 125 MHz) (Germany). Chemical shift is reported in parts per million (ppm) from tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard in DMSO-d₆ as a solvent.

All chemicals used were of analytical reagent grade (Merck). All solutions were prepared with deionized water. The stock standard Fe(III) solution was prepared by dissolving 0.6757 g of FeCl₃6H₂O in 1 10⁻³ M HCl and diluting to 250 mL. A 1 10⁻² M stock complexing agent solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1871 g ligand in 1 10⁻³ M HCl and diluting to 100 mL. The working solution was obtained by diluting the stock Fe(III) and ligand solution in 1 10⁻³ M HCl. The ionic strength was kept constant at 0.02 by adding appropriate amounts of NaCl solution (0.5 M). All the glassware used was washed with aqueous HCl (1 : 1) and then thoroughly rinsed with tap, distilled, and finally deionised water.

3. Preparation of Ligand

A solution of 3,4-Dihydroxy cyclo but -3 ene -1,2 dione (6.37 g, 48.97 mmoL) was added in small portions to a solution of thiosemicarbazide (4.46 g, 48.97 mmoL) in water (45 mL) and 12 M hydrochloric acid (4.18 mL) in ethanol (40 mL). The solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours. The resulting white precipitate was filtered, washed with cold water, and dried under vacuum at 70°C for 5 hours to give 9.05 g, 91% yield of 2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide as a white solid, White powder (Figure 1). FT-IR (KBr) max (cm⁻¹): 3210–3370 (N–H, NH2), 1780, (C=O), 1666 (C=N). ¹H-NMR (DMSO d6, 500 MHz); δ (ppm): 14.89 (2H, OH), 8.75 (2H, NH2), 7.63 (1H, NH). ¹³C-NMR (DMSO d₆, 125.77 MHz); δ (ppm): 190.89 (C=O), 179.50 (C=S), 162.43, 159.67, 156.21 (C=C, C=N).

Figure 1: Proposed structure of the ligand (2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide). (z)-2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrazinecarbothioamide.

3.1. Spectrophotometric Determination of Fe(III) Ions

For the determination of Fe(III), transfer aliquots of the standard or sample solution  (pH = 3) containing 0.002–0.335 mg of iron to a 10 mL volumetric flask,  add 4 mL of 10⁻³ M reagent solution and 0.4 mL of 0.5 M of NaCl. Dilute to the mark with 10⁻³ M HCl, Mix, and measure the absorbance at 465 nm.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Absorption Spectra

The absorption spectra of Fe(III), ligand and Fe(III)-ligand complex were recorded (Figure 2 curves a, b, and c, respectively). The absorption maximum of the ligand is at 236 nm and that of complex is at 465 nm indicating the formation of a complex between the ligand and Fe(III). The molar absorptivity of the complex calculated from the absorbance data was found to be 1.95 10³ Lmol⁻¹cm⁻¹ at 465 nm.

Figure 2: Visible absorption spectra of the Fe(III) (a), ligand (b), Fe(III)-ligand complex (c).

4.2. The Effect of pH

The effect of pH on the determination of Fe(III) in aqueous medium was investigated spectrophotometrically. For this purpose, the absorbances were measured in the range of 10⁻¹–10⁻⁶ M HCl at 465 nm. The results obtained are shown in Figure 3. As it is clearly seen, the amount of Fe(III) can be determined quantitatively in the 10⁻³ M HCl at pH ~ 3.

Figure 3: Effect of pH on the formation of Fe(III)-ligand complex.

4.3. Effect of Ionic Strength

The effect of ionic strength was examined by establishing various concentrations of NaCl in the range of 0–0.1 M in the sample solutions. It was observed that ionic strength at 0.02 gave the most satisfactory results as evident by having obtained the maximum absorbance at 465 nm (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Effect of ion strength on the formation of Fe(III)-ligand complex.

4.4. Effect of Reagent Concentration

The effect of ligand concentration on the complex formation was examined in the range of 0.5–6 × 10⁻⁴ M using the solutions in which the concentrations of Fe(III) were fixed on 1 × 10⁻⁴ M. As shown in Figure 5, the absorbance measurements established that the requested ligand concentration to complete the complex formation should be 4 × 10⁻⁴ M.

Figure 5: The effect of ligand concentration on the complex formation.

4.5. Nature and Stability of the Complex

The stoichiometric ratio of Fe(III) and ligand in the complex was determined using the Job’s method of continuous variation. Solutions of Fe(III) and ligand of the same concentration (10⁻⁴ M) were prepared and then mixed in the volume ratio from 1 : 9 to 9 : 1. The Job curve of this system at HCl concentration of 10⁻³ M and I = 0.02 is shown in Figure 6. The maximum at M : L = 0.33 indicates that the formation of the complex is in the metal: ligand ratio of 2 : 1. The color of Fe(III) complex was instantaneous, and the intensity remained constant for at least 48 h.

Figure 6: Determination of the stoichiometry of Fe(III)-ligand complex by the Job method of continuous variations: = = 10⁻⁴ M; pH = 3; = 0.02.

The composition of the complex was also determined by applying the mole ratio method. A series of solutions were prepared with a constant concentration of FeCl₃6H₂O (10⁻⁴ M) and variable 2-(2,3-dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide concentrations (0.1 × 10⁻⁴–5 × 10⁻⁴ M). It can be seen (Figure 7) that the metal: ligand ratio in the complex is 2 : 1, which agrees with result obtained by the Job’s method.

Figure 7: Determination of the stoichiometry of Fe(III)-ligand complex by the mole ratio method: = 10⁻⁴ M, = (0.1 10⁻⁴–5 10⁻⁴) M; pH = 3; = 0.02.

4.6. Beer’s Law and Sensitivity

Table 1 compares the analytical characteristics of the proposed with those of previously published spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Fe(III). A calibration graph for the determination of Fe(III) was prepared under optimum experimental conditions (Ionic strength = 0.02 and 4 × 10⁻⁴ M ligand in 10⁻³ M HCl) (Figure 8). Beer’s law is obeyed within a wide range of 0.27–33.50 μgmL−1 of Fe(III) at 465 nm (Table 2). The calibration graph can be represented by a linear regression equation:   . Here, y is the absorbance and x the concentration of Fe(III) in μgmL⁻¹. The molar absorptivity is 1.95 10³ LmoL⁻¹cm⁻¹ and the Sandell’s sensitivity calculated on the basis of total Fe(III) present is 0.114 μgcm⁻².

Table 1: Analytical characteristics of the proposed method and comparison with some other spectrophotometric methods.

Reagent
Condition pH
LDR

(μg·mL⁻¹)
LOD

(μg·mL⁻¹)

(nm)
Reference

2-(2,3-Dihydroxy-4-oxocyclobut-2-enylidene) hydrozinecarbothiamide
3, HCl
0.27–33.50
0.08
465
This work

Morin
—
0.4–15
0.36
412
[28]

2,6-Dihydroxy benzoic acid
3, Formic acid/sodium formate
3.24–97.2
0.4
560
[4]

2-Ethanolimino-2-pentylidino-4-one
3.5, HNO₃
2–17
Not reported
440
[29]

thiocyanate and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide
3-4 HNO₃
0–6
Not reported
474
[30]

2-Carboethoxy-1,3-indandione
1.5–3.5, HCl
0.27–27.92
0.04
500
[31]

Table 2: Conditions for the spectrophotometric determination of Fe(III).

Wavelength of maximum absorbance (nm)
465

Limit of detection (LOD) (μg·mL⁻¹)
0.08

Limit of quantification (LOQ) (μg·mL⁻¹)
0.26

LOD/LOQ
0.3

Linear range (μg·mL⁻¹)
0.27–33.50

Molar absorptivity (L·mol⁻¹·cm⁻¹)
1.95 × 10³

Optimized pH
~3

Calibration graph slope
0.035

Intercept
0.008

Correlation coefficient ()
0.995

Relative standard deviation (%)
0.8–1.2%

was determined for Fe(III) in the range of 0.3–30 μg·mL⁻¹.

Figure 8: Calibration curve for Fe(III), = 4 10⁻⁴ M; pH = 3; = 0.02.

4.7. Precision

The precision of the method was checked by taking 10 replicate measurements on solutions each containing 0.3–30 μg·mL⁻¹ of Fe(III). The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the results of the determination of Fe(III) was in the range of 0.8–1.2%. Detection limit estimated from the standard deviation (SD) of the blank and calibration sensitivity (slope of calibration line), (LOD = 3 SD/sensitivity [32]) amounted to 0.08 μg·mL⁻¹ of Fe(III) (Table 1). Limit of quantification (LOQ) is 0.26 μg·mL⁻¹ of Fe(III), and the LOD/LOQ ratio is 0.3.

4.8. Effect of Diverse Ions

The interference effect of cations and anions on the determination of iron ( = 10⁻⁴ M) and the tolerance limits of the interfering ions are given in Table 3.

Table 3: Effect of diverse ions on the determination of Fe(III).

Ion added
Tolerance level cion/cFe(III)

Hg⁺², Ag⁺¹
100

Mg⁺², Co⁺²
50

Ni⁺², Zn⁺², Cu⁺², Fe⁺², ,
10

5. Applications

The proposed method was applied for the determination of Fe(III) in real samples such as tap water, cow milk, and human serum.

Tap water samples were obtained from Rafsanjan City. To determine Fe(III), 10 mL of water sample was spiked with solution of 10⁻³ M Fe(III) and was analyzed by the analytical procedure.

To 10 mL of cow milk, few drops of concentrated nitric acid were added, and the sample was centrifuged for few minutes. Then the supernatant solution was taken, its pH was adjusted to ~3, and the resulting solution was spiked. The solution was then analyzed according to the given procedure.

To 1 mL of human serum added 5 mL of 30 wt% trichloroacetic acid to precipitate protein. The mixture was centrifuged to remove protein. Supernatant liquid was transferred to a fresh test tube and then pH was adjusted to ~3 and the resulting solution was spiked. The solution was then analyzed according to the given procedure. The obtained results are given in Table 4.

Table 4: Determination of Fe(III) in tap water, cow milk, and human serum.

Sample
Fe(III) (μg·mL⁻¹)
Recovery (%)

Added
Found

Tap water
10.45
9.81 ± 0. 7
93.87

Cow milk (1.5% fat)
8.1
7.56 ± 0. 4
93.33

Cow milk (2.5% fat)
8.10
7.29 ± 0. 6
97.40

Human serum
13.50
12.13 ± 0. 7
89.85

6. Conclusions

The proposed method is simple, rapid, and selective. The performance of the method described here allows the determination of iron(III) in tap water, cow milk, and human serum. The stoichiometry of complex was determined (2 : 1 for Fe(III): ligand). This method provides an appropriate selectivity for easy determination of 0.27–33.50 μgmL⁻¹ Fe(III) ions. The ligand used in this study has advantage over other ligands currently utilized for photometric Fe(III) determination and there was no interference from Fe(II) at the detection of Fe(III) at concentration ratio = 10. As a result, this ligand can be used in speciation analysis.

References

F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1988.

N. N. Greenwood and A. Earnshaw, Chemistry of the Elements, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989.

F. Shakerian, S. Dadfarnia, and A. M. Haji Shabani, “Separation, preconcentration and measurement of inorganic iron species by cloud point extraction and flow injection flame atomic absorption spectrometry,” Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 594–601, 2009.

M. S. Hosseini and S. Madarshahian, “Investigation of charge transfer complex formation between Fe(III) and 2,6-Dihydroxy benzoic acid and its applications for spectrophotometric determination of iron in aqueous media,” E-Journal of Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 985–992, 2009.

P. K. Tarafder and R. Thakur, “Surfactant-mediated extraction of iron and its spectrophotometric determination in rocks, minerals, soils, stream sediments and water samples,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2005.

Y. Huang, D. Yuan, J. Ma, M. Zhang, and G. Chen, “Rapid speciation of trace iron in rainwater by reverse flow injection analysis coupled to a long path length liquid waveguide capillary cell and spectrophotometric detection,” Microchimica Acta, vol. 166, no. 3-4, pp. 221–228, 2009.

M. Noroozifar, M. Khorasani-Motlagh, and R. Akbari, “Pneumatic flow injection analysis-tandem spectrometer system for iron speciation,” Analytical Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 141–144, 2006.

A. S. Amin and A. A. Gouda, “Utility of solid-phase spectrophotometry for determination of dissolved iron(II) and iron(III) using 2,3-dichloro-6-(3-carboxy-2-hydroxy-1-naphthylazo)quinoxaline,” Talanta, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1241–1245, 2008.

Ö. Inan and Y. Özdemir, “Chemical composition and iron speciation of traditional Turkish fruit juice concentrate (Pekmez),” Journal of Food Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 320–324, 2009.

E. Pehlivan and D. Kara, “Iron speciation by solid phase extraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometry using N,N′-bis-(2-hydroxy-5-bromobenzyl)-2-hydroxy-1,3- diiminopropane,” Microchimica Acta, vol. 158, no. 1-2, pp. 137–144, 2007.

S. Saçmacı and S. Kartal, “Selective extraction, separation and speciation of iron in different samples using 4-acetyl-5-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 623, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2008.

S. L. C. Ferreira, H. S. Ferreira, R. M. de Jesus, J. V. S. Santos, G. C. Brandao, and A. S. Souza, “Development of method for the speciation of inorganic iron in wine samples,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 602, no. 1, pp. 89–93, 2007.

C. Xiong, Z. Jiang, and B. Hu, “Speciation of dissolved Fe(II) and Fe(III) in environmental water samples by micro-column packed with N-benzoyl-N-phenylhydroxylamine loaded on microcrystalline naphthalene and determination by electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 559, no. 1, pp. 113–119, 2006.

L. Xia, Y. Wu, Z. Jiang, S. Li, and B. Hu, “Speciation of Fe(III) and Fe(II) in water samples by liquid–liquid extraction combined with low-temperature electrothermal vaporization (ETV) ICP-AES,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 953–962, 2003.

X. Pu, B. Hu, Z. Jiang, and C. Huang, “Speciation of dissolved iron(II) and iron(III) in environmental water samples by gallic acid-modified nanometer-sized alumina micro-column separation and ICP-MS determination,” Analyst, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 1175–1181, 2005.

B. H. Li and X. P. Yan, “Rapid speciation of iron by on-line coupling of short column capillary electrophoresis and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with the collision cell technique,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 916–922, 2007.

M. Grotti, F. Soggia, F. Ardini, and R. Frache, “Determination of sub-nanomolar levels of iron in sea-water using reaction cell inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after Mg(OH)₂ coprecipitation,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 522–527, 2009.

Ø. Mikkelsen, C. M. G. van den Berg, and K. H. Schrøder, “Determination of labile iron at low nmol L-1 levels in estuarine and coastal waters by anodic stripping voltammetry,” Electroanalysis, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2006.

P. L. Croot and M. Johansson, “Determination of iron speciation by cathodic stripping voltammetry in seawater using the competing ligand 2-(2-thiazolylazo)-p-cresol (TAC),” Electroanalysis, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 565–576, 2000.

S. Roncevic and I. Steffan, “Characterization of hyphenated HPIC/ICP-OES system response for iron speciation in natural waters,” Atomic Spectroscopy, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 125–132, 2004.

S. Ichinoki, S. Fujita, Y. Fujii, and J. Liq, “Selective determination of iron ion in tap water by solvent extraction with 3,4-Dihydro-3-hydroxy- 4-oxo-1,2,3-benzotriazine, followed by reversed phase HPLC,” Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 281–292, 2009.

M. Ghaedi, A. Shokrollahi, K. Niknam, and M. Soylak, “Cloud point extraction of copper, zinc, iron and nickel in biological and environmental samples by flame atomic absorption spectrometry,” Separation Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 773–786, 2009.

D. L. Giokas, E. K. Paleologos, and M. I. Karayannis, “Speciation of Fe(II) and Fe(III) by the modified ferrozine method, FIA-spectrophotometry, and flame AAS after cloud-point extraction,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 373, no. 4-5, pp. 237–243, 2002.

G. A. Kandhro, T. G. Kazi, J. A. Baig, H. I. Sirajuddin Afridi, A. Q. Shah, and H. R. Sheikh, “Zinc and iron determination in serum and urine samples of thyroid patients using cloud point extraction,” Journal of AOAC International, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 1589–1594, 2010.

P. Liang, H. Sang, and Z. Sun, “Cloud point extraction and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry determination of manganese(II) and iron(III) in water samples,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 304, no. 2, pp. 486–490, 2006.

F. Hayati and G. Derya, “Cloud point extraction for speciation of iron in beer samples by spectrophotometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 209–213, 2012.

A. Abbaspour, M. A. Mehrgardi, A. Noori, M. A. Kamyabi, A. Khalafi-Nezhad, and M. N. S. Rad, “Speciation of iron(II), iron(III) and full-range pH monitoring using paptode: a simple colorimetric method as an appropriate alternative for optodes,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 857–865, 2006.

M. Balcerzak, A. Tyburska, and E. Oewiêcicka-Fûchsel, “Selective determination of Fe(III) in Fe(II) samples by UV-spectrophotometry with the aid of quercetin and morin,” Acta Pharmaceutica, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 327–334, 2008.

A. S. Orabi, A. E. Marghany, M. A. Shaker, and A. E. Ali, “Spectrophotometric determination of Fe(III), Cu(II) and UO₂(II) ions by a new analytical reagent derived from condensation of monoethanolamine and acetyl acetone,” Bulletin of the Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia, vol. 24, pp. 11–19, 2005.

P. K. Tarafder and R. Thakur, “Surfactant-mediated extraction of iron and its spectrophotometric determination in rocks, minerals, soils, stream sediments and water samples,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 2005.

A. A. Magda, “Preconcentration extractive separation, speciation and spectrometric determination of iron(III) in environmental samples,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 199–209, 2003.

D. A. Skoog, D. M. West, and F. J. Holler, Fundamental of Analytical Chemistry, Brooks/Cole, New York, NY, USA, 8th edition, 2004.