Journal of Chemistry

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 837649, 8 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/837649

Research Article

Reduction of Magnetite in the Presence of Activated Carbon Using Mechanical Alloying

Ledwaba Harry Moloto,1,2 Sunnyboy Stanley Manzini,² and Ezekiel Dixon Dikio¹

¹Applied Chemistry and Nanoscience Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Vaal University of Technology, P.O. Box X021, Vanderbijlpark 1900, South Africa

²Material Science Department, Sasol Technology, Sasolburg, South Africa

Received 14 February 2013; Revised 14 April 2013; Accepted 22 April 2013

Academic Editor: Svetlana Ibric

Copyright © 2013 Ledwaba Harry Moloto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The reduction behaviour of magnetite using graphite under ball-milling conditions (using a planetary mono mill, Fritsch Pulverisette 6) has been investigated. The reaction of magnetite and graphite at different milling conditions leads to the formation of Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ species, the former increasing at the expense of Fe₃O₄. Fe₃O₄ completely disappeared after a ball to powder ratio of 50 : 1 and beyond. The Fe²⁺ species were confirmed to be due to FeO using Mössbauer Spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction techniques. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analyses confirm the reduction of magnetite to wüstite.

1. Introduction

Many oxidic iron compounds (iron oxides: oxy-hydroxides and hydroxides) not only play an important role in a variety of disciplines but also serve as model systems of reduction and catalytic reactions [1]. The reduction of these compounds has been investigated for decades. Despite this, the reduction behaviour of the oxides is not fully understood as yet. To date the reduction mechanism is still plagued with uncertainties and conflicting theories, partly due to the complex nature of these oxides and intermediates formed during the reduction [2].

The reduction of iron oxide occurs in steps. For example, during the reduction of hematite (α-Fe₂O₃), magnetite (Fe₃O₄) is first formed followed by nonstoichiometric wüstite (FexO) and lastly metallic iron (α-Fe). The rate of transformation depends on the reduction conditions employed (like the reducing agent used such as H₂, CO or a combination thereof). Further, this reduction is accompanied by changes in the crystal structure as new materials are formed [3].

Direct reduction of iron oxides by solid carbon has also been reported [2]. The carbon source could be coke, graphite, coal, char, deposited carbon, and activated carbon [2, 3]. There is still, however, no conclusive mechanistic investigation as to how such transformation occurs. Mechanical alloying is a well-established method used to induce solid state reactions. For example, it has been shown that different iron carbides species can be formed during the ball milling of α-Fe with activated carbon at various stages of the process [4, 5].

This study reports on the reduction of magnetite using graphite under ball-milling conditions. Magnetite is a naturally occurring iron oxide, which is thermodynamically stable at ambient conditions [6, 7]. Therefore magnetite is well suited for the investigation of the reduction behaviour of iron oxides. The effect of ball to powder ratio (BPR), milling time and speed on the reduction process was investigated. The aim of the study is to gain an understanding of the mechanism of the reduction of magnetite induced by graphite during mechanical alloying.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Method

Magnetite (Sigma-Aldrich, 98.0%) and graphite (C) (Sigma-Aldrich, <20 μm, synthetic) were weighed to obtain a metal oxide to C mole ratio of 1 : 3. The cumulative mass of the mixture was 20.0 g. The mixture was then placed inside a bowl of a high energy planetary mono mill (Fritsch Pulverisette 6) operating at speeds up to 400 rpm. Stainless steel balls were then weighed to get the required ball to powder ratio (BPR) and also placed into the bowl. The BPR ratios of 20 : 1 to 100 : 1 were used. The steel balls used were a mixture of 10 mm and 20 mm in diameter, with most of the space taken up by the smaller balls (10 mm). The speed of the mill was set at 400 rpm and intermittent cooling was achieved by introducing a rest period of 30 minutes for every 30 minutes of milling until the preset milling period of 20 h was attained. This was done to prevent excessive temperature rise during milling. Although the bowl was sealed in an argon atmosphere, the sealing was insufficient to prevent gas exchange such that the introduction of air into the system could not be ruled out. Once the required milling time had elapsed, the system was allowed to cool back to room temperature and the reaction mixture was then collected for further analysis.

2.2. Characterization

The phase composition and morphological features of magnetite and subsequent reactive products were analyzed by Mössbauer Absorption Spectroscopy (MAS), Field Emission Scanning Electron microscopy (FE-SEM), High Resolution Transmission Electron microscopy (HR-TEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray Diffraction Spectroscopy (XRD). The surface morphology (SEM and EDS measurements) were recorded with a JEOL 7500 F field emission scanning electron microscope. The HR-TEM images of the sample were obtained using a CM 200 electron microscope operated at 100 kV. X-ray powder diffraction data acquisition was performed using a Philips X’Pert Pro multi-purpose diffractometer with Fe filtered Co radiation as a primary X-ray beam ( = 1.78897 ). The instrument was operated at a voltage of 40 kV and tube current of 40 mA with a goniometer scanning continuously 2θ values from 5° to 120°. Phase identification was done using the X’Pert High Score Plus software. MAS measurements were performed using a constant acceleration spectrometer equipped with a ⁵⁷Co (Rh) source. Mössbauer measurements were recorded at room temperature over a velocity range of ±12 mm/s. The generated MAS spectra were analyzed by means of a least squares program “Normos” that models the peaks as a combination of quadruple doublets and sextets based on a Lorentzian line-shape profile. The calibration of the velocity scale was done using metallic iron foil (α-Fe). A Zeiss ULTRA 55 FEGSEM Instrument was used for Back scatter electron (BSE) analysis. The instrument has a field emission tungsten hairpin filament with a ZrO reserve, as an electron source. EDS analysis and elemental mapping were performed using a Bruker XFlash SDD detector that is, controlled by Bruker ESPIRIT software.

3. Results and Discussion

Ball milling of Fe₃O₄ and graphite was performed by varying the BPR whilst keeping the milling period and milling speed constant (Table 1). The as-prepared samples of Fe₃O₄ obtained at different milling speeds were collected and analysed to determine the effect of BPR on the morphology and reactive products of the magnetite-graphite mixture. The Mössbauer parameters are presented in Table 2. Figure 1 exhibits the Mössbauer spectrum of commercial magnetite obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, whereas Figure 2 displays the Mössbauer spectra of magnetite-graphite mixture (1 : 3 mole ratio) at different ball to powder ratios (20 : 1 to 100 : 1) and their corresponding X-ray diffractograms are displayed in Figure 3. The spectrum in Figure 1 was fitted with a combination of two sextets with parameters δ = 0.29 mm/s, = 0.01 mm/s, = 49.2 T for the outermost sextet and δ = 0.66 mm/s, = 0.01 mm/s, = 46.0 T for the inner sextet. It has been reported that magnetite presents a ferrimagnetic ordering below the Néel temperature () of = 850 K [8], and thus, the MAS spectrum of Fe₃O₄ at room temperature consists of two sextets, one corresponding to Fe³⁺ on the A site (outer sextet) and the other one to a mixture of Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ on the B site (inner sextet). Magnetite is an inverse spinel; that is, it has 8Fe³⁺ cations in a tetrahedral site (A sublattice) with anions, while 8Fe³⁺ and 8Fe²⁺ cations are in octahedral site (B sublattice) with anions [8, 9]. Hence, the structural formula is Fe³⁺[Fe²⁺Fe³⁺]O₄. In typical spinels, the larger cation, like Fe²⁺ in this example, should have been in the A sublattice. The ratio of Fe cations on A site and B site as well as Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ ratio for a given sample provides an indication of stoichiometry. For the pure magnetite analysed, the Fe (A-site)/Fe (B-site) ratio was found to be 1 : 2, while the Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ ratio was 2 : 1 as expected [10].

Table 1: F₃O₄/C (1 : 3 mole ratio) milling conditions.

BPR
Time (h)
Speed (rpm)

20
15
400

30

50

60

100

40
15
400

450

500

Table 2: MAS parameters of the ball-milled magnetite and graphite mixtures (1 : 3 mole ratio) at different ball to powder ratios (BPR), while rotational speed and milling periods were kept constant at 400 rpm and 20 hours, respectively.

BPR
MAS parameters
■% Content
Phases

#δ/mms⁻¹
#/mms⁻¹
* /T

0
0.29
0.01
49.2
100
Fe₃O₄

0.66
0.01
46.0

20 : 1
0.29
0.01
48.5
90
Fe₃O₄

0.61
−0.01
45.1

0.35
1.42
—
5
Fe³⁺

0.77
1.38
—
5
Fe²⁺

30 : 1
0.29
0.02
48.4
42
Fe₃O₄

0.63
−0.05
45.0

0.27
0.38
—
6
Fe³⁺

0.89
0.96
—
52
Fe²⁺

40 : 1
0.28
0.02
48.4
16
Fe₃O₄

0.68
−0.05
45.0

0.28
0.44
—
11
Fe³⁺

0.89
0.92
—
73
Fe²⁺

50 : 1
0.28
0.44
—
11
Fe³⁺

0.89
0.92
—
89
Fe²⁺

60 : 1
0.28
0.44
—
12
Fe³⁺

0.89
0.92
—
88
Fe²⁺

Error: #±0.02 mms⁻¹, *±0.5 T, ■±1.0%.

Figure 1: Room temperature MAS spectrum of commercial sourced magnetite.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

Figure 2: Room temperature MAS spectra of the ball-milled magnetite and graphite mixtures (1 : 3 mole ratio) at different ball to powder ratios (BPR), while rotational speed and milling periods were kept constant at 400 rpm and 20 hours, respectively.

Figure 3: X-ray diffractograms of the ball-milled magnetite and graphite mixtures (1 : 3 mole ratio) at different ball to powder ratios (BPR), while rotational speed and milling periods were kept constant at 400 rpm and 20 hours, respectively.

The spectrum in Figure 2(a) was obtained when magnetite and graphite mixture was subjected to reactive milling at BPR 20 : 1. The figure shows two pronounced sextets with parameters matching those of magnetite (and its relative content was about 90%) coexisting with two quadrupole doublets: the first is due to Fe³⁺ species with parameters, δ = 0.35 mm/s, = 1.42 mm/s and a relative content of about 5%. The second doublet was due to Fe²⁺ species and had parameters δ = 0.77 mm/s, = 1.38 mm/s, with a relative content of about 5%. XRD data only exhibited intensity peaks for the magnetite phase; hence the doublets observed using MAS could have been due to small crystallites of magnetite that exhibited superparamagnetism at room temperature or due to phases that were XRD amorphous. The former is most likely to have been the case, and the use of low temperature MAS could have given a definitive answer. Superparamagnetism can be observed when fast relaxations of the magnetic moments due to thermal excitation at temperatures below the Curie temperature or Néel temperature (at which materials are supposed to show magnetic behaviours) occur and usually result in materials exhibiting paramagnetic behaviours [11]. The net effect of such phenomenon on the MAS spectrum is a collapse of the magnetically split components (sextets) into paramagnetic doublets or singlets. Note that superparamagnetism could also be observed if isomorphous substitution of iron by other elements takes place [11], and in this investigation, no such cations were present.

The spectrum is obtained at BPR 30 : 1. Figure 2(b) shows two sextets and two quadrupole doublets as well. The sextets had parameters synonymous with magnetite and its relative content was 42%. The relative contents of Fe³⁺ and Fe²⁺ species were 6 and 52%, respectively. The high Fe²⁺ content undeniably signifyies that the magnetite (Fe₃O₄) was reduced to a predominantly Fe²⁺ species. The MAS parameters for the Fe²⁺ species were markedly different to those obtained at BPR 20 : 1, indicating the possibility that a different Fe²⁺ species could have been formed in the process. XRD data (Figure 3) indeed showed the presence of wüstite (FexO, ), a nonstoichiometric iron oxide which has an iron oxidation state of nearly 2 [12]. The marked decrease in the relative content of the magnetite demonstrated that the use of higher BPR could promote the reduction of magnetite. Indeed at a BPR 40 : 1, Figure 2(c), the relative content of magnetite receded further to about 16%, whilst the Fe²⁺ species content increased to about 73%. There was a need to check whether the increased Fe²⁺ content was due to the reduction of magnetite by graphite during the milling process. The milling of magnetite using identical milling conditions as stated previously (BPR 40 : 1) did not yield a product rich in Fe²⁺ content, rather a product that was predominantly Fe³⁺. Hence it could be deduced that carbon was necessary to affect the reduction. The MAS spectra obtained when a BPR of 50 : 1 and beyond (Figures 2(d) and 2(e)) only contained contributions due to the Fe³⁺ and Fe²⁺ species with relative contents of 11 and 89%, respectively, with MAS parameters similar to those obtained for the BPR of 40 : 1. The data thus indicated that no further reduction occurred and that all iron oxide was in the form of wüstite. Note that wüstite with up to 13% of relative content in the form of Fe³⁺ contribution has been recorded [13] and the 11% Fe³⁺ contribution observed in this work is not surprising. XRD probe showed that the magnetite-graphite powder after milling using a BPR beyond 50 : 1 was only composed of wüstite. The fact that no further reduction occurred with increasing BPR beyond 50 : 1 implied that the energy impacted by the balls and bowl on the magnetite-graphite powder was no longer sufficient to reduce the iron oxide any further to form metallic iron and/or iron carbides. In essence, the study showed that by increasing the BPR, whilst keeping the other parameters constant (milling speed and time), magnetite could be selectively reduced to wüstite.

Back scatter electron (BSE) image of ball-milled magnetite is presented in Figure 4. The morphology of the image, Figure 3(a), shows large particle sizes of magnetite and graphite mixture before milling separately in the background. The morphology of the milled mixture, Figure 3(b), shows reduced particle size of magnetite in the mixture as microcrystal.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Back Scatter Electron (BSE) images of pure magnetite at different magnifications (a) (75X) and (b) (200X), (a) morphology of particles before milling and (b) morphology of particle after milling for 20 hrs.

Figure 5 shows the EDS spectrum of a ball-milled magnetite-graphite mixture. Energy dispersive spectroscopy was employed to identify the elements in the mixture after milling. The spectra show the elements, carbon, oxygen, and iron in large quantity as can be observed from the intensity of their peaks. Other elements observed are chlorine, palladium and gold impurities. The intensity of these elements shows their presence in minute quantities.

Figure 5: Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of magnetite and graphite milled for 20 hrs.

Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of ball-milled magnetite and graphite is presented in Figure 6. Figures 6(a)–6(h) show particle size distributions obtained at various BPRs. The high and low magnification images of Fe₃O₄ powder before milling, Figures 6(a) and 6(b), show an agglomeration of fine microcrystals of Fe₃O₄, which were predominantly hexagonal in shape. Ball-milled magnetite-graphite mixtures at BPR ratios of 20 : 1 to 100 : 1 are presented in Figures 6(c)–6(h). A comparison of Figure 6(b) with Figures 6(f)–6(h), shows a much reduced particle size as a result of milling. At BPR 60 : 1 and beyond, Figures 6(g) and 6(h), no noticeable reductions in particle size were observed despite an increase in BPR. This observation collaborated what was noted using MAS that yielded a constant Fe³⁺ and Fe²⁺ contributions that did not vary with BPR beyond 50 : 1. The fact that the milled products were crystalline was confirmed by XRD that detected the presence of crystalline magnetite and/or wüstite phases.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 6: Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images of (a) Fe₃O₄ powder prior to milling at high magnification (50 00K X), (b) Fe₃O₄ powder prior to milling at low magnification (11 00K X), (c) 20 : 1 BPR, (d) 30 : 1 BPR, (e) 40 : 1 BPR, (f) 50 : 1 BPR, (g) 60 : 1 BPR, (h) 100 : 1 BPR.

Transmission electron micrograph of ball-milled magnetite and graphite is presented in Figures 7(a)–7(f). The images show the magnetite completely fractured into fine particles which are crystalline engulfed in amorphous carbon. The fracture points observed on the magnetite particles are probably reaction points where wüstite was formed as a result of the reduction of magnetite with graphite during the milling process [14, 15]. Figures 7(c)–7(f) show significantly reduced particles as a result of the increased BPR.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 7: Low magnification transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of pure magnetite (a and b) at 100 nm magnification, (c) TEM image at BPR 40 : 1, (100 nm) and (d) (20 nm). (e) TEM image at BPR 50 : 1, (100 nm) and (f) (20 nm).

4. Conclusion

Mechanical alloying of magnetite and graphite at various ball to powder ratios have resulted in the transformation of magnetite to wüstite, selectively. No other iron bearing phase was detected other than the two mentioned previously. The reaction of magnetite and graphite at different milling conditions leads to the formation of Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺ species, the former increasing at the expense of Fe₃O₄. Fe₃O₄ completely disappeared after a ball to powder ratio of 50 : 1 and beyond when probed using Mössbauer absorption and X-ray diffraction techniques. The mechanochemistry of the continuous collision between the milling balls induces chemical reaction that resulted in the reduction of magnetite to wüstite. Electron imaging techniques (TEM and SEM) showed continuous reduction of particle size as the BPR was increased. The reduction of magnetite did not continue beyond wüstite suggesting that there was insufficient energy imparted by the balls and bowl to further reduce the iron oxide to metallic iron and/or lead to the formation of carbides.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Faculty of Applied and Computer Science Research and Publications Committee of Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, and the Material Science Department of Sasol, Sasolburg, South Africa.

References

A. P. Radlinski, A. Calka, B. W. Ninham, and W. A. Kaczmarek, “Application of surface active substances in mechanical alloying,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 134, no. C, pp. 1346–1349, 1991.

S. Prakash, “Reduction and sintering of fluxed iron ore pellets-a comprehensive review,” Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, vol. 96, p. 3, 1996.

J. V. Khaki, Y. Kashiwaya, K. Ishii, and H. Suzuki, “Intensive improvement of reduction rate of hematite-graphite mixture by mechanical milling,” ISIJ International, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2002.

V. M. Nadutov, B. N. Mordyuk, G. I. Prokopenko, and I. S. Gavrilenko, “Mössbauer and X-ray studies of Fe-powder mechanically alloyed with C using power ultrasonics,” Ultrasonics, vol. 42, no. 1–9, pp. 47–51, 2004.

R. Nowosielski and W. Pilarczyk, “Structure and properties of Fe-6.67% C alloy obtained by mechanical alloying,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 162-163, pp. 373–378, 2005.

J. M. Grenèche, M. Hervieuc, A. M. Mercier, and N. Randrianantoandro, “Direct phase transformation from hematite to maghemite during high energy ball milling,” Materials Letters, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 150–158, 2001.

J. V. Khaki, M. R. Aboutalebi, and S. Raygan, “The effect of mechanical milling on the carbothermic reduction of hematite,” Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2004.

R. M. Cornell and U. Schwertmann, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2nd edition, 2006.

V. Schünemann and H. Winkler, “Structure and dynamics of biomolecules studied by Mössbauer spectroscopy,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 63, no. 3, article 263, 2000.

G. Belozerski, “Mössbauer effect and studies of surface layers,” Elsevier, New York, NY, USA, 1993.

B. Rodmacq, “Superparamagnetic properties of small iron hydroxide precipitates in ion exchange membranes,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 45, no. 11-12, pp. 1119–1127, 1984.

C. A. McCammon and D. C. Price, “Mössbauer spectra of FexO (x>0.95),” Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 250–254, 1985.

N. N. Greenwood and A. T. Howe, “Mössbauer studies of Fe1−x O. Part I. The defect structure of quenched samples,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, pp. 110–116, 1972.

E. P. Yelsukov, A. L. Ulyanov, and G. A. Dorofeev, “Comparative analysis of mechanisms and kinetics of mechanical alloying in Fe-Al and Fe-Si systems,” Acta Materialia, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 4251–4257, 2004.

D. Chen, J. Cai, J. Fang, and Z. Chen, “Preparation of Al–Mo intermetallic powders by solid–liquid reaction ball milling,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 485, no. 1-2, pp. L9–L11, 2009.