Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 9452303, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9452303

Research Article

Experimental Investigation of Coal Dust Wettability Based on Surface Contact Angle

Gang Zhou,1,2,3,4 Han Qiu,1,4 Qi Zhang,1,4 Mao Xu,1,4 Jiayuan Wang,1,4 and Gang Wang1,4

¹State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-Founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
²College of Mining and Safety Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
³Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Gas and Fire Prevention and Control of Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
⁴Key Laboratory of Safety and High-Efficiency Coal Mining of Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China

Received 30 March 2016; Revised 27 June 2016; Accepted 17 July 2016

Academic Editor: Thijs A. Peters

Copyright © 2016 Gang Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Wettability is one of the key chemical properties of coal dust, which is very important to dedusting. In this paper, the theory of liquid wetting solid was presented firstly; then, taking the gas coal of Xinglongzhuang coal mine in China as an example, by determination of critical surface tension of coal piece, it can be concluded that only when the surface tension of surfactant solution is less than 45 mN/m can the coal sample be fully wetted. Due to the effect of particle dispersity, compared with the contact angle of milled coal particle, not all the contact angles of screened coal powder with different sizes have a tendency to increase. Furthermore, by the experiments of coal samples’ specific surface areas and porosities, it can be achieved that the volume of single-point total pore decreases with the gradual decreasing of coal’s porosity, while the ultramicropores’ dispersities and multipoint BET specific surface areas increase. Besides, by a series of contact angle experiments with different surfactants, it can be found that with the increasing of porosity and the decreasing of volume percentage of ultramicropore, the contact angle tends to reduce gradually and the coal dust is much easier to get wetted.

1. Introduction

As an inevitable product during the productive process in coal mine, coal dust has four main hazards as follows: workers who contact with dust for a long time are inclined to get pneumoconiosis. Dust leads to dust explosion when meeting some certain conditions. Dust can make the field visuality much worse, which will bring out other safety accidents. Dust can accelerate the electromechanical equipment’s wear and reduce the reliability of precision instrument. Among the above four hazards, the most serious ones are dust explosion and pneumoconiosis [1, 2]. There were 14 dust explosion accidents that happened in coal mine of China, leading to 483 deaths from the beginning of 2000 to the end of 2015 [3]. From 1950s to now, the number of cumulative reported pneumoconiosis cases of coal mine in China is more than 743 thousand, among which there are more than 282 thousand deaths; more seriously, the reported pneumoconiosis number is as high as 11396 only in 2015 [4]. According to the incomplete statistics, the number of people who died of pneumoconiosis in Chinese coal mine is six times as those who died from other mine disasters or accidents; in addition, the medical expenses on treating pneumoconiosis can reach 8 billion RMB every year in China [5]. Therefore, research on dust prevention is of great importance for coal mine safety production and miners’ physical and mental health.

Nowadays, spraying dedusting is still the most widely used dust-prevention measurement in coal mine, which not only is economic and convenient but also can get good dedusting effects, and in this way the average dust reduction rate can reach about 60%, while there are many factors influencing the spraying dedusting effects, and the main ones include the physical and chemical properties of coal dust, spraying pressure, nozzle type, particle size of droplets, and sprayer arrangement, among where the coal dust wettability is one of the key factors. Therefore, conducting the research on the coal dust wettability is very significant to improve the spraying dedusting effects.

In coal mine dedusting field, studies about the coal dust wettability have been limited to measure the contact angle formed on the surface of suppressed coal powder test piece by distilled water for a long period; this method is somewhat simple and the research achievement is not much. The main research themes are shown as follows: the relations among proximate analysis, element analysis of coal powder, and its wettability [6–9], the influence of coal dust’s surface structures on its wetting properties [10–13], and coal dust wetting dynamic model [14–17]. However, the researches on the following aspects are rare: comparative analysis of wettability between milled coal particle and coal powder with different sizes after screening, study on the relations between porosity characters of coal and its wettability, which is outstanding in the application of coal seam water injection field, and research on the relations between critical surface tension of coal dust and its wettability by contact angle method. Besides, generally the coal dust wettability is poor, so in spraying dedusting process surfactants are usually added to decrease the droplets’ surface tensions to make the dust-prevention effects better [18, 19]. Therefore, it is very necessary to analyze the wetting effect of different surfactants to coal dust.

Classical measuring methods of contact angle can be divided into three kinds: angle method, length method, and gravimetric method. Among them, angle method is easy to implement with high accuracy; thus it is very popular in coal dust wettability characterization [20]. Therefore, as for the weakness of the above research, in this paper, video optical contact angle measuring device has been used to conduct series of experiments on the contact angles formed by different surfactants and coal powder with different porosity characters; meanwhile, the critical surface tension of coal piece, the contact angles formed by different surfactants, and coal powder with different dispersion degrees before and after screening were tested, making the coal dust wetting mechanism improved and promoted.

2. Theoretical Background

2.1. The Concept of Liquid-Solid Interface and Wetting

The broad sense of wettability is the nature appearing during the process in which gas on solid surface is substituted by liquid. Liquid with different properties has different wettabilities for the same solid, while liquid with same property has different wettabilities for different solid.

Similar to the surface molecules of liquid, surface molecules of solid also have unsaturated intermolecular force. Because the solid surface is much more uneven than liquid surface, solid has much surface free enthalpy. Generally, liquid has the surface free enthalpy below 100 mJ/m², while solid surface can be divided into two kinds: surface with free enthalpy below 100 mJ/m² is called the low-energy surface, and those with free enthalpy above 100 mJ/m² or even above 500–5000 mJ/m² are called the high-energy surface. Therefore, the interface phenomenon will happen with the decrease in free enthalpy, as soon as the solid (especially the solid with high-energy surface) contacts with the surrounding mediums.

The solid interface exposed to the air is called the solid surface, which absorbs large amounts of gas. When solid surface contacts with liquid, the adsorption gas will be exhausted; meanwhile the liquid and solid interfaces are formed. In theory, this phenomenon is called wetting.

Assume that the surface tensions of liquid, solid, and the tension of liquid-solid interface are expressed by the forces along the surface and interface (as shown in Figure 1):

Figure 1: Schematic diagram about the wetting of dust particle expressed by surface tension.

The process of wetting of dust particle can be expressed by the well-known Young equation:

where is contact angle, °; is dust/gas interfacial tension, mN/m; is dust/water interfacial tension, mN/m; is water/gas interfacial tension, mN/m.

2.2. Wettability Criterion

Because of the wetting, new liquid-solid interface appears, taking place of the gas-solid interface, accompanied by changes of free enthalpy, which can be used for judging wetting. There are three kinds of wetting, as shown in Figure 2.

(a) Spreading wetting

(b) Impregnation wetting

(c) Adhesion wetting

Figure 2: Wetting types.

The criterions for different wetting types are as follows: spreading wetting: ; impregnation wetting: ; adhesion wetting: . For the mineral dust, the wettability can be classified as the following three types by the value of contact angle [21]: water-wet: ; intermediate-wet: ; gas-wet: .

2.3. The Meaning of Critical Surface Tension

In reality, another criterion judging the wetting ability has been found, namely, which is the critical surface tension of solid. According to the experiments conducted by Zismann and some others, when determining the contact angle of liquid with different surface tensions on smooth and clean solid surface, the cosine of the contact angle has a linear relationship with the surface tension, which is called the Zismann curve. Namely, when the liquid surface tension is greater than of a kind of solid, the liquid cannot fully wet the solid surface; otherwise, the solid surface could be fully wetted [22].

3. Experimental Method

3.1. Collection of the Coal Sample

The coal sample collected in Xinglongzhuang coal mine of Yankuang Group was gas coal. The results of proximate and elemental analysis of the coal sample were shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Proximate analysis and elemental analysis of the coal sample.

Proximate analysis/%
Elemental analysis/%

5.26
7.35
34.72
52.67
81.61
11.16
5.77
1.15
0.31

3.2. Preparation of the Test Piece

Presently, there are two main ways to measure the contact angle on the coal pore surface. The first is to replace the pore surface with polished surface of coal; the second is to use the compressed surface of the shaped coal powder to take place of the pore surface. The brief introduction of the second method is as follows. To get the target coal powder, the coal sample was processed by a jaw crusher and a sealed pulverizer and then grinded with the ball mill for 30 s. Then, the powder was firstly put into the vacuum drying oven to be dried for 2 h under 130°C to remove water. Secondly, 200 mg powder was taken to remain under 30 MPa condition for 2 minutes by using desktop powder tablet compressing machine and the matched ID13 cylindrical tablet mold. When removed out, the circular test piece with polished plane, which had a diameter of 13 mm and a thickness of 2 mm, was achieved.

3.3. Contact Angle and Critical Surface Tension Measurements

The contact angle between surfactant solution and test piece was determined by DSA100 video optical contact angle measuring device. The device has functions such as automatically storing contact angle pictures (videos), automatically analyzing contact angle values, and automatically storing testing results. It not only has the advantages of clear picture, highly accurate testing result, and simple control, but also has additional functions such as measuring the surface tension of liquid solution by hanging drop method, as well as measuring the surface tension of solid using the surface energy method.

( 1) Contact Angle Measurements. The status of distilled water droplets and wetting agents generated on the surface of coal samples has been imaged and analyzed by the optical contact angle meter (DSA100) via the methods of “contact angle using” and “circle fitting.” The contour line of the wetting result is displayed on the image of the drops and all the measurement results of contact angle can be automatically acquired and displayed by the meter. And the measuring error of the instrument is 0.01°.

(2) Critical Surface Tension Measurements. When dropped on a surface of the coal sample, the liquid does not completely spread over but forms a certain angle with the solid. If liquids with different surface tensions are placed on the surface of the pressed specimen of pulverized coal and a DSA100 optical contact angle meter is used to determine the surface tension of droplets and the contact angles, different surface tensions have a linear relationship with the cosine of contact angles. When the line is nudged outwards to a contact angle with the cosine value of 1, the corresponding surface tension is the critical surface tension between the solid and the liquid.

3.4. Determination of Coal Pore Characteristics

To study the relations among the contact angles formed on coal powder test pieces with different porosities, the pore characteristics of the samples from #10301, #1308, and #7301 work face of Xinglongzhuang coal mine were firstly measured, using the SSA-4000 series specific surface area and aperture analyzer based on the principle of low temperature liquid-nitrogen adsorption in the static volumetric method. At low temperature, the adsorption of nitrogen follows physisorption. Mass balance equation and static gas pressure test were used to determine the porosity during the adsorption process [23, 24]. The test is normally conducted at liquid-nitrogen temperature. A given volume of gas was filled in the sample tube via gas line. When the adsorption reached equilibrium, the molar mass of the adsorbed gas was calculated based on pressure drops and thus the adsorption-desorption isotherms were determined [25]. Then, the specific surface area and pore diameter distribution parameters of the samples can be equivalently obtained via relevant theoretical models [26, 27].

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Determination of the Critical Surface Tension of Coal Sample

The critical surface tensions of the compressed test pieces made by coal powder from #10301 work face of Xinglongzhuang coal mine are measured by contact angle measuring device. According to the test results, the critical surface tension of the test piece made by dry coal powder was 44.85 mN/m, but the one made by nondry coal powder was 49.77 mN/m, which was greater than the former. Therefore, only when the surface tension of the surfactant solution was less than 45 mN/m, according to the definition of , could the coal be fully wetted; namely the contact angle would be 0°. On the other hand, for the same solution, the test piece made by nondry coal powder could be more easily wetted totally than that by dry coal powder, which was attributed to the changes of indexes such as moisture, volatiles, and ash before and after drying the coal.

4.2. Comparative Analysis of Contact Angles for Milled and Screened Coal Dust

The coal particle grinded by the ball mill for 30 s was, respectively, classified by the standard test sieve of 70 meshes (aperture of 0.224 mm), 100 meshes (aperture of 0.154 mm), 160 meshes (aperture of 0.094 mm), 200 meshes (aperture of 0.074 mm), and 320 meshes (aperture of 0.045 mm). After being compressed, the test pieces of coal powder with different sizes were obtained. The coal sample was from 10301 work face of Xinglongzhuang coal mine, and the surfactants were, respectively, taken from one of the following four kinds: anionic, cationic, nonionic, or amphoteric. For example, the changing tendency of formed contact angles when the test pieces are wetted by the solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in different mass concentrations is shown in Figure 3. The total test data is shown in Table 2 and Figure 4.

Table 2: Determination results of contact angles on test pieces of coal powder before and after being screened.

Name of surfactants
 Contact angle/°

Concentration/%
Sieving meshes
Coal particle milled for 30 s
 Change rates of the contact angle
 for different meshes/%

70
100
160
200
320
70
100
160
200
320

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/anionic
0.005
43.58
52.87
52.27
54.63
60.40
43.68
−0.1
9.19
8.59
10.95
16.72

0.05
21.35
25.80
25.08
33.76
45.46
28.04
−6.69
−2.24
−2.96
5.72
17.42

0.5
0
0
7.14
7.23
10.77
0
0
0
7.14
7.23
10.77

Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)/cationic
0.005
33.36
52.16
55.47
64.94
61.63
58.97
−25.61
−6.81
−3.5
5.97
2.66

0.05
17.71
19.94
24.44
28.95
37.09
15.74
1.97
4.2
8.7
13.21
21.35

0.5
9.03
16.08
20.16
21.79
21.96
12.28
−3.25
3.8
7.88
9.51
9.68

Cocoanut fatty acid diethanolamide (CFAD)/nonionic
0.005
27.94
21.17
41.54
45.16
50.11
47.40
−19.46
−26.23
−5.86
−2.24
2.71

0.05
25.85
33.97
27.84
44.68
41.08
41.22
−15.37
−7.25
−13.38
3.46
−0.14

0.5
17.82
26.69
27.77
32.76
33.07
22.89
−5.07
3.8
4.88
9.87
10.18

Dodecyl dimethyl betaine (DDB)/amphoteric
0.005
27.72
41.89
60.68
64.09
66.36
49.65
−21.93
−7.76
11.03
14.44
16.71

0.05
26.10
29.50
46.78
51.66
59.14
48.74
−22.64
−19.24
−1.96
2.92
10.4

0.5
7.82
13.73
20.08
15.69
19.40
16.47
−8.65
−2.74
3.61
−0.78
2.93

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Effect of different SDS concentration on contact angle: (a) 0.005%, (b) 0.05%, and (c) 0.5% SDS.

Figure 4: Comparison chart of contact angles among coal pieces with different powder sizes.

According to Table 2 and Figure 4,

(1)compared with contact angles formed by coal particle milled for 30 s, not all contact angles of coal powder screened by different meshes tended to increase. After being screened by 70 and 100 meshes, for coal pieces, their average changing values of contact angles decreased by 10.57° and 4.27°, while the values increased by 2.01°, 6.69°, and 10.12°, respectively, after being screened by 160, 200, and 320 meshes. The main reason was that the average granularity of coal particle milled for 30 s was smaller than 0.15 mm, and both large and small particle sizes have been distributed. However, after being screened by 70 and 100 meshes, the particle size was larger and the maximum size could reach 0.224 mm, while the maximum size of coal powder screened by 160, 200, and 320 meshes could only reach 0.094 mm;(2)the wetting types of all the coal pieces with each particle size are impregnation wetting. With the increase in the number of sieving meshes, the contact angle tended to increase gradually. During the process that the particle size of coal powder decreased from 0.224 mm to 0.074 mm, the average value of contact angle formed by the four reagents increased from 21.52° to 27.82°, 34.10°, 38.78°, and 42.21° gradually;(3)the anionic and cationic surfactants (SDS and CTAB) have better wetting ability than the nonionic and amphoteric surfactants (CFAD and DDB), which is similar with the contact angles formed on natural coal pieces, because the contact angles formed by the two former reagents were 28.45° and 31.76°, respectively, which were smaller than 33.83° and 36.97° formed by the two latter reagents.

4.3. Analysis of the Relationship between Pore Characteristics of Coal and Its Wettability

4.3.1. Determination of Porosities of Different Coal Samples

Figure 5 shows the isotherm diagram of the nitrogen’s absorption and desorption process about the sample from #10301 work face. The summary of experimental data can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3: Summary of experimental data about the porosity of coal sample in #10301, #1308, and #7301 work face.

Experiment items
#10301
#1308
#7301

Multipoint BET specific surface area/(m²g⁻¹)
4.547
5.260
6.368

Specific surface area of BJH accumulative adsorption/(m²g⁻¹)
0.861
0.790
1.882

Specific surface area of BJH accumulative desorption/(m²g⁻¹)
1.841
1.362
2.753

Total pore volume of single-point/(ccg⁻¹)
0.0212
0.0136
0.0096

Total pore volume of BJH accumulative adsorption/(ccg⁻¹)
0.0193
0.0092
0.0087

Total pore volume of BJH accumulative desorption/(ccg⁻¹)
0.0184
0.0087
0.0081

Micropore volume of single-point adsorption/(ccg⁻¹) (radius < 10 Å)
0.0024
0.0027
0.0031

Mean bore radius of single-point/Å
66.6
51.4
45.5

Mean bore radius of BJH adsorption/Å
206.0
221.5
210.1

Mean bore radius of BJH desorption/Å
135.7
122.6
96.4

Most probable aperture of BJH adsorption/Å
72.7
82.9
64.6

Most probable aperture of BJH desorption/Å
19.4
19.0
18.3

Figure 5: Isotherm diagram of the nitrogen’s absorption and desorption process.

According to the experiment [28], coal samples in different mining areas had different porosities, which gradually decreased from #10301 work face to #1308 work face and then to #7301 work face. For example, the total pore volume of single-point, respectively, decreased from 0.0212 cc/g to 0.0136 cc/g and then to 0.0096 cc/g. However, the multipoint BET specific surface area increased from 4.547 m²/g to 5.260 m²/g and then to 6.368 m²/g. In addition, with the decrease in the total pore volume of single-point, the micropore volume of single-point adsorption also increased from 0.0024 cc/g to 0.0027 cc/g and then to 0.0031 cc/g; namely, the dispersity of the ultramicropore decreased with the increase in the porosity.

4.3.2. Determination of Contact Angle of Coal Samples with Different Porosities

The selection of surfactant solution is the same as the reagents in Table 2. Then, the contact angles on the polished coal samples were determined by the contact angle measuring device. Experimental data is shown in Table 4 and Figure 6, and the measuring error of the contact angle is 0.01°.

Table 4: Determination results of contact angles of coal samples with different porosities.

Name of reagents
 Contact angle/°

Concentration/%
Coal samples from different work faces

#10301
#1308
#7301

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/anionic
0.005
16.73
19.43
26.35

0.05
13.76
12.37
17.37

0.5
0
0
0

Cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)/cationic
0.005
12.78
14.34
19.25

0.05
8.48
7.89
9.51

0.5
0
0
0

Cocoanut fatty acid diethanolamide (CFAD)/nonionic
0.005
27.23
30.59
32.27

0.05
17.87
18.65
20.92

0.5
2.01
6.08
6.64

Dodecyl dimethyl betaine (DDB)/amphoteric
0.005
32.03
34.01
37.75

0.05
23.41
25.11
25.81

0.5
3.90
6.18
7.04

Figure 6: Comparison chart of the contact angles between polished coal surface and coal piece surface.

By analyzing data of porosities and contact angles, the relations between them were achieved. The relationships among contact angle and multipoint BET specific surface area, total pore volume of single-point, and micropore volume of single-point adsorption were shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: The relationships among contact angles and different porosity characteristics of different samples.

According to Table 4 and Figures 6 and 7,

(1)for the same kind of reagent with same concentration, there is a big difference in the contact angle formed by coal samples with different porosities. But no matter what kind of surfactant solution is, with the increase in coal porosity and the decrease in volume percentage of the ultramicropore (aperture  nm = 100 Å), the contact angle tends to gradually decrease. The main reason for this phenomenon is that coal’s increasing porosity and decreasing aperture dispersity help improve the surfactant’s capacity to seepage into coal pores, thus increasing wetting effects to coal;(2)anionic and cationic surfactants have better wetting ability to the natural coal surface than nonionic and amphoteric surfactants. When reagents (SDS and CTAB) formed contact angles on natural coal surface, their average values are 10.16° and 7.09°, which are smaller than 15.70° and 19.78° formed by reagents (CFAD and DDB);(3)obviously, the contact angle measured on the polished coal surface is smaller than that on the compressed coal piece surface. For example, for coal samples from #10301 working face, the average values of contact angles of four reagents (SDS, CTAB, CFAD, and DDB), which have three concentrations for each reagent, on polished coal surfaces are smaller than those on coal piece surfaces (coal particle milled for 30 s) by 13.74°, 21.91°, 21.47°, and 18.51° respectively.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, taking the gas coal in Xinglongzhuang coal mine as an example, the wetting characteristics of coal dust with different pore structure and particle size were investigated by contact angle experiments. The results showed that, with the gradual decreasing in the porosity of coal sample, the single-point total pore volume also decreases, while multipoint BET specific surface area increases. Single-point adsorption micropore volume increases with the decrease in single-point total pore volume. While the dispersion degree of ultramicropore decreases with the increase in porosity. With the increase in coal porosity and decrease in volume percentage of the ultramicropore (aperture  nm = 100 Å), the contact angle tends to decrease, and the coal is more easy to get wetted. In view of gas coal dust used in the experiment, only when the surface tension of the surfactant solution was less than 45 mN/m could the coal be fully wetted. And surfactants of anion and cation (SDS and CTAB) have better wetting ability than nonionic and amphoteric one (CFAD and DDB) regardless of compressed or polished coal pieces.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (Grant no. U1261205); National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 51474139); SDUST Research Fund (Grant no. 2014JQJH106); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Special Project (Grant no. 2016T90642); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (Grant no. 2015M570602); Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Gas and Fire Prevention and Control of Ministry of Education (Grant no. 2015KJZX02); Science and Technology Project of Huangdao District, Qingdao (Grant no. 2014-1-30); Qingdao Postdoctoral Applied Research Project (Grant no. 2015194); Open Fund of the Key Laboratory of Safety and High-Efficiency Coal Mining of Ministry of Education (Grant no. JYBSYS2014105); The Key Technology Projects of Chinese State Administration of Work Safety for Preventing Major Safety Production Accidents (Grant no. Shandong-0083-2015AQ).

References

H. Wang, D. Wang, W. Ren, X. Lu, F. Han, and Y. Zhang, “Application of foam to suppress rock dust in a large cross-section rock roadway driven with roadheader,” Advanced Powder Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 257–262, 2013.

H. Wang, D. Wang, Y. Tang, B. Qin, and H. Xin, “Experimental investigation of the performance of a novel foam generator for dust suppression in underground coal mines,” Advanced Powder Technology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1053–1059, 2014.

G. Zhou, W.-M. Cheng, C.-C. Xu, and W. Nie, “Characteristic analysis of ¹³C-NMR for the wettability difference of coal dust with diverse degrees of metamorphism,” Journal of the China Coal Society, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 2849–2855, 2015.

G. Zhou, J. Xue, W.-M. Cheng, W. Nie, and H. Wang, “Effect of stacking structure on the wettability of coal dust based on X-ray diffraction experiment,” Chinese Journal of Engineering, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1535–1541, 2015.

W. Nie, Research on the Airborne Dust Migration Rule and Inhibition Technology in Mechanized Excavation Face, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, 2013.

T. Murata, “Wettability of coal estimated from the contact angle,” Fuel, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 744–746, 1981.

A. Gosiewska, J. Drelich, J. S. Laskowski, and M. Pawlik, “Mineral matter distribution on coal surface and its effect on coal wettability,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 107–116, 2002.

A. Gosiewska, J. Drelich, M. Pawlik, J. Laskowski, and T. Eisele, “Contact angles on heterogeneous coal surface: the effect of mineral matter,” Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, vol. 2, pp. 177–199, 2002.

D. P. Savitskyi, “Impact of the pH on angles of contact of water wettability of brown coal,” Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 155–160, 2015.

R. Ramesh and P. Somasundaran, “Chemical and wettability studies on coal, humic acid and cyclized humic acid,” Fuel, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 533–535, 1989.

Q. Li, B. Lin, S. Zhao, and H. Dai, “Surface physical properties and its effects on the wetting behaviors of respirable coal mine dust,” Powder Technology, vol. 233, pp. 137–145, 2013.

T. Chaturvedi, J. M. Schembre, and A. R. Kovscek, “Spontaneous imbibition and wettability characteristics of Powder River Basin coal,” International Journal of Coal Geology, vol. 77, no. 1-2, pp. 34–42, 2009.

A. Saghafi, H. Javanmard, and K. Pinetown, “Study of coal gas wettability for CO₂ storage and CH₄ recovery,” Geofluids, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 310–325, 2014.

N. Siemons, H. Bruining, H. Castelijns, and K.-H. Wolf, “Pressure dependence of the contact angle in a CO₂–H₂O-coal system,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 297, no. 2, pp. 755–761, 2006.

N. S. Kaveh, E. S. J. Rudolph, K.-H. A. A. Wolf, and S. N. Ashrafizadeh, “Wettability determination by contact angle measurements: hvbB coal-water system with injection of synthetic flue gas and CO₂,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 364, no. 1, pp. 237–247, 2011.

R. Sakurovs and S. Lavrencic, “Contact angles in CO₂-water-coal systems at elevated pressures,” International Journal of Coal Geology, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2011.

N. Shojai Kaveh, K.-H. Wolf, S. N. Ashrafizadeh, and E. S. J. Rudolph, “Effect of coal petrology and pressure on wetting properties of wet coal for CO₂ and flue gas storage,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 11, pp. 91–101, 2012.

F. O. Orumwense, “Estimation of the wettability of coal from contact angles using coagulants and flocculants,” Fuel, vol. 77, no. 9-10, pp. 1107–1111, 1998.

V. A. Arkhipov, D. Y. Paleev, Y. F. Patrakov, and A. S. Usanina, “Coal dust wettability estimation,” Journal of Mining Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 587–594, 2014.

R. Ramesh and P. Somasundaran, “Centrifugal immersion technique for characterizing the wettability of coal particles,” Journal of Colloid And Interface Science, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 291–294, 1990.

W. G. Anderson, “Wettability literature survey—part 2: wettability measurement,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1246–1262, 1986.

F. F. O. Orumwense, “Wettability of coal—a comparative study,” Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 204–211, 2001.

B. Holland, “Determination of both mesopores and macropores in three-dimensional ordered porous materials by nitrogen adsorption,” Journal of Porous Materials, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2003.

S. V. Potapov, A. A. Fomkin, V. A. Sinitsyn, A. V. Shkolin, and A. L. Pulin, “Nitrogen adsorption by microporous adsorbents in the range of high pressures and supercritical temperatures,” Protection of Metals and Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 519–523, 2010.

G. Wang, K. Wang, and T. Ren, “Improved analytic methods for coal surface area and pore size distribution determination using 77 K nitrogen adsorption experiment,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 329–334, 2014.

M. Nezafati, I. Sohn, J. B. Ferguson, J.-S. Park, K. Cho, and C.-S. Kim, “DFT study on the adsorption and absorption behaviors of liquid nitrogen in the Mg nano alloys synthesized from powder metallurgy,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 105, pp. 18–26, 2015.

J. Pan, Q. Niu, K. Wang, X. Shi, and M. Li, “The closed pores of tectonically deformed coal studied by small-angle X-ray scattering and liquid nitrogen adsorption,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 224, pp. 245–252, 2016.

G. Zhou, Research of Theory about Dust Prevention by Water-Cloud and Relevant Techniques for Fully-Mechanized Caving Coal Face, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China, 2009.