Journal of Chemistry
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 5285671, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5285671

Research Article

A Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC-UV Method for Determination and Chemical Hydrolysis Study of a Novel Naproxen Prodrug

Mohamed H. M. Hamid1,2 and Tilal Elsaman¹

¹Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Omdurman Islamic University, P.O. Box 2587, 11452 Khartoum, Sudan
²Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, P.O. Box 12810, Khartoum, Sudan

Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamed H. M. Hamid; drholo2@gmail.com

Received 9 April 2017; Revised 7 August 2017; Accepted 17 August 2017; Published 25 October 2017

Academic Editor: Orazio Nicolotti

Copyright © 2017 Mohamed H. M. Hamid and Tilal Elsaman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

A new naproxen amide prodrug was synthesized and spectrally characterized and a simple, precise, and accurate stability-indicating RP-HPLC method was developed and validated for determination and chemical hydrolysis study of the prodrug. Forced degradation studies were conducted as per the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines to establish the stability-indicating power of the method. Separations were performed on a C₁₈ column (150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm p.s.). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer pH 4.0 in the ratio 60 : 40. The flow rate and injection volume were 1.0 mL/min and 15 μL, respectively. The peaks were monitored at 272 nm. The average retention time is 5.136 min. The linearity of the method was investigated in the range of 10–50 μg/mL and was found to be larger than 0.9987. The LOD and LOQ were found to be 1.853 and 5.615 μg/mL, respectively. Results indicated that the degradants are well resolved and separated from the prodrug. Hydrolysis kinetics studies were carried out in buffer solutions (pH 1.2, 5.5 and 7.4) to establish the fate of the prodrug. The half-lives in the respective buffers were 23.5, 262, and 334 hours indicating sufficient stability to attain the goal of oral delivery.

1. Introduction

A prodrug is a modified biologically active compound that will release the active compound in vivo following enzymatic or chemical cleavage. Many drugs have unwanted properties that hinder their clinical use, such as susceptibility to acid hydrolysis in the stomach, causing damage to the stomach itself. There are many approaches to overcome those problems such as coating, different formulations, and different routes of administration. However, chemical derivatization of the drug into a prodrug remains the most common approach [1, 2]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly used agents for the symptomatic relief of fever, minor inflammations, headaches, swelling, sports related pains, and arthritis pain. They are also very helpful in postoperative, menstrual, and dental pains. Individually, they have different characteristics, but all of them share one pharmacological activity in-common, which is their ability to inhibit the cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme family. COX enzymes have many isoforms, but only two are well studied. They are COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is responsible for prostaglandins generation, which have cytoprotective effects on the stomach. COX-2 is mainly activated by inflammation. Therefore, most of the anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic effects of the NSAIDs are attributed to their inhibition of COX-2, while most of their side effects can be related to inhibition of COX-1. Because NSAIDs are almost always used chronically especially by the elderly, their dangerous gastrointestinal (GI), cardiac, and renal side effects constitute a problem hindering their use. The prodrug approach is an effective way to mask the carboxylic acid group of NSAIDs, which is the main culprit in the GI adverse effects [3, 4].

Naproxen is a NSAID of the phenylpropanoic acid class just like ibuprofen. Its GI toxic side effects are intermediate between ibuprofen (low) and indomethacin (high). Its structure is enantiomeric, which is (+)-2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)-propanoic acid (Figure 1) [5]. Naproxen (NP) still has all the side effects of NSAIDs; therefore, naproxen prodrugs were studied. Ester and amide prodrugs are the most studied prodrugs of naproxen. Studies show that they do reduce the GI adverse reactions of naproxen significantly [2, 5–7].

Figure 1: Chemical structure of S-naproxen.

Quite a lot of different naproxen prodrugs were synthesized and reported in the literature [5, 6, 8–15]. However, the naproxen prodrug understudy here (referred to here after as pro-NP, Figure 2) contains and will release glycine in vivo which is not only safe but useful as a nutrient for the body. Furthermore, the intermediate of the synthesis of pro-NP is reported in the literature [16] to possess pharmacological activities. Microwave-assisted transesterification was used here for the first time to synthesize a naproxen prodrug. This reduces the transesterification time significantly and enhances the lipophilicity of the resulting prodrug which is crucial for oral activity.

Figure 2: Chemical structure of pro-NP.

Stability-indicating methods were described in the literature to study the chemical hydrolysis of naproxen prodrugs [12, 13, 15, 17–19]. Most of them employed HPLC with UV detection and C₁₈ columns for its simplicity the same as in the method below. However, Rautio et al. [13] used a fluorescence detector and Sheha et al. [15] used a C₈ column.

In light of the above and in continuation of our interest to synthesize a GI sparing NSAIDs prodrugs [2, 20], a new amide prodrug of naproxen (pro-NP) was synthesized and spectrally characterized and a validated stability-indicating RP-HPLC method was developed for studying the chemical stability of pro-NP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

S-Naproxen and ethyl glycinate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Microwave reactor (CEM, USA) was used in final synthesis step. The reaction was monitored by TLC on precoated silica G plates using UV lamps. Melting point was determined on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus and is uncorrected. Infrared (IR) Spectrum was recorded as KBr disc using the Perkin Elmer FT-IR Spectrum BX apparatus located at the Research Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). NMR spectrum was scanned in DMSO-d6 on a Bruker NMR spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for ¹H and 125.76 MHz for ¹³C at the Research Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). Chemical shifts are expressed in -values (ppm) relative to TMS as an internal standard. Coupling constants () are expressed in Hz. D₂O was added to confirm the exchangeable protons. Mass spectra were measured on Agilent Triple Quadrupole 6410 QQQ LC/MS with ESI (Electrospray ionization) source. The acetonitrile RS used was HPLC grade, was purchased from Carlo Erba Reagents S.A.S. (F-27106 Val-de-Reuil Cedex, France), and was used without further purification. All other reagents used were of analytical grade.

2.2. Synthesis

Pro-NP was synthesized by coupling of S-naproxen with glycine ethyl ester hydrochloride using DCC as coupling agent according to the literature method [2] (Scheme 1). The resulting intermediate was further subjected to microwave-assisted transesterification reaction in propanol using potassium cyanide as catalyst for five minutes. The final product was purified by column chromatography using hexane : ethyl acetate as mobile phase.

Scheme 1: Synthesis of the targeted pro-NP.

2.3. Chromatographic Conditions

The HPLC method was developed on a Shimadzu prominence UFLC system (Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan) that consisted of a UV/Vis detector (SPD-20AV), a degasser (DGU-20A3R), column oven (CTO-20A), and a pump (LC-20AB). The column used was C₁₈ (150 × 4.6 mm internal diameter, 5 μm particle size) at ambient temperature. Isocratic elution was used with the mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer pH 4.0 in the ratio 60 : 40. The flow rate and injection volume were 1.0 mL/min and 15 μL, respectively. The peaks were monitored at the wavelength of 272 nm. The average retention time is 5.136 min.

2.4. Preparation of Standard Stock Solution

A standard stock solution of pro-NP (100 μg/mL) was prepared by dissolving accurately weighed 10 mg of the drug in 100 mL methanol.

2.5. Preparation of Phosphate Buffer pH 4.0

6.80 g of KH₂PO₄ was dissolved in 700 mL of water. Then the pH was adjusted when necessary with 10% v/v H₃PO₄. Water was added to complete to 1000 mL (BP 2013).

2.6. Forced Degradation Stability Studies/Specificity

Forced degradation stability study was conducted as per ICH guidelines Q1A (R2) [21] and Q1B [22], regarding hydrolytic degradation, thermal degradation, photolytic degradation, and oxidative degradation. Results for forced degradation study are shown in Table 2.

2.6.1. Acidic and Alkaline Hydrolytic Degradation Study

For the acid hydrolysis study, 2 mL of the pro-NP stock solution was transferred to a 20 mL volumetric flask and was completed up to the mark with 0.1 N HCl. A blank solution was also prepared. A determination of both solutions was made at zero time and after 24 h. For the base hydrolysis study, 2 mL separately of the pro-NP stock solution was transferred to two 20 mL volumetric flasks and completed up to the mark with 0.1 N and 0.01 N NaOH. Two blank solutions were made. A determination of all four solutions was made at only zero time.

2.6.2. Oxidative Degradation Study

2 mL of the pro-NP stock solution was transferred to a 20 mL volumetric flask and made up to the mark with 3% H₂O₂ and an aliquot was injected into the HPLC at zero time and after 24 h. In another flask, 2 mL of the pro-NP stock solution was made to the mark with 6% H₂O₂ and put in an oven set at 50°C for 2 h and then an aliquot was injected into the HPLC. Blanks were made and analyzed.

2.6.3. Thermal Degradation Study

The solid pro-NP drug was put in an oven set at 70°C and an appropriate amount was taken, dissolved in methanol, and injected into the HPLC after 24 h and another after 48 h.

2.6.4. Photolytic Degradation Study

The solid pro-NP drug was subjected to different lamps that emit visible light, short UV, and long UV. After two days, an appropriate amount was taken, dissolved in methanol, and injected into the HPLC.

2.7. Method Validation

The proposed method was validated as per ICH guidelines [23] with respect to linearity, specificity, accuracy, precision, LOD, LOQ, and robustness.

2.7.1. Specificity (Selectivity)

In addition to forced degradation studies specificity was also confirmed by spiking pro-NP with naproxen (NP), which is a known degradant of pro-NP. 10 mg of naproxen RS (NP) was dissolved in 100 mL of methanol to give 100 μg/mL stock solution of NP. 2 mL of the NP stock solution was mixed with 4 mL of pro-NP stock solution and completed to 20 mL with methanol and an aliquot of the mixture was injected into the HPLC. The resolution () between the two peaks was calculated.

2.7.2. Linearity

The standard solutions for the estimation of linearity were prepared as per Table 1. Standard solutions used in the estimation of linearity (calibration curve) were prepared by suitable dilutions from the pro-NP stock solution to attain solutions of different concentrations. A plot of the peak area versus the concentration of the standard solutions was made (Figure 7). Regression analysis was carried out on the plot. From the regression data, the correlation coefficient (), the slope of the line, the -intercept, and line equation were calculated in Table 3.

Table 1: Preparation of standard solutions for the evaluation of linearity.

Concentration (µg/mL)
Volume pipetted from the stock (mL)
Volume made up to (mL)

10
2
20

15
3
20

20
4
20

25
5
20

30
6
20

50
10
20

Table 2: Results of forced degradation stability studies.

Stress condition
Nature of pro-NP
Number of determinations
Time (hours)
Temperature (°C)
Degradation (%)

Hydrolysis, acidic
Solution
In 0.1 N HCl
24
25
21.5

Hydrolysis, alkali
Solution
In 0.1 N NaOH
0
25
100

In 0.01 N NaOH
0
25
100

Oxidation
Solution
In 3% H₂O₂
24
25
0

In 3% H₂O₂
24
50
0

In 6% H₂O₂
2
50
0

Thermal
Solid
Once
48
70
0

Photolytic
Solid
Once
48
25
0

Table 3: Data from the regression analysis.

Parameter
Pro-NP

Linearity range
10–50 µg/mL

Slope
19173.985

Intercept

Regression coefficient
0.998740

Regression equation

LOQ
5.61457116 µg/mL

LOD
1.852808483 µg/mL

2.7.3. Precision

Precision has been established in three steps: assessment of repeatability, interday precision assessment, and intraday precision assessment.

2.7.4. Robustness

Small but deliberate changes were made to the mobile phase pH, which is 4.0, and the detection wavelength, which is 272 nm. Twelve determinations were made as follows: 3 at 270 nm, 3 at 274 nm, 3 at pH 4.3, and 3 at pH 3.7. The % RSD was calculated for the determinations at the changed parameters with the determinations at the normal parameter.

2.7.5. LOD and LOQ

The LOD and LOQ were calculated from the equations

where is the standard deviation of the responses and is the slope of the calibration curve.

2.8. Determination of the Hydrolysis Reaction Kinetics In Vitro

Chemical hydrolysis was studied at 37°C ± 1°C in pH 1.2 (SGF), pH 5.5 phosphate solution (duodenal pH), and pH 7.4. Each reaction was initiated by taking 3 mL of the stock methanolic solution of pro-NP, to 20 mL volumetric flask, one drop of Tween-80 was added, and the volume completed to the mark with the buffer solution of the intended pH. The solutions were transferred to screw-capped test tubes. Samples were taken at appropriate time intervals spread over eight hours and chromatographed and the residual concentrations were calculated.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Spectral Data for the Intermediate

White powder; yield (76%), m.p. (84–86°C). IR (KBr): /cm⁻¹ 3360 (NH), 1713 (C=O, ester), 1669 (C=O, amide). ¹H NMR: (CDCl₃) 1.23 (t, 3H, = 7.0 Hz, –OCH₂CH₃), 1.64 (d, 3H, J = 7 Hz, –CHCH₃), 3.76–3.79 (q, CHCH₃), 3.94–4.05 (m, 5H, –OCH₃ and NHCH₂), 4.15–4.19 (q, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz, OCH₂), 5.9 (s, 1H, NH, D₂O-exchangeable) 7.14–7.19 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.43 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.72–7.76 (m, 3H, ArH). ¹³C NMR: 14.08 (OCH₂CH₃), 18.4 (CHCH₃), 41.5 (NHCH₂), 46.8 (–CHCH₃), 55.3 (–OCH₃), 61.4 (O–CH₂CH₃), 105.6, 119.18, 126.28, 127.59, 128.99, 129.62, 133.81, 136.02, 157.77 (Ar–C), 169.85 (–C=O amide), 174.44 (–C=O ester). MS-ESI: 315.6 (M⁺).

3.2. Spectral Data for Pro-NP

White powder; yield (90%), m.p. (72–75°C). Microwave condition: T° = 150°C, power = 200 wat, pressure = 247 psi, time = 5 minute. IR (KBr): /cm⁻¹ 3311 (NH), 1730 (C=O, ester), 1640 (C=O, amide). ¹H NMR: (CDCl₃) 0.91 (t, 3H, J = 7.0 Hz, –OCH₂CH₂CH₃), 1.59–1.65 (m, 5H, –CHCH₃ and –CH₂CH₃), 3.76–3.79 (q, 1H, CHCH₃), 3.94–4.05 (m, 7H, –OCH₃, NHCH₂ and –OCH₂), 5.9 (s, 1H, NH, D₂O-exchangeable) 7.14–7.19 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.43 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz, ArH), 7.72–7.76 (m, 3H, ArH). ¹³C NMR: 10.25 (OCH₂CH₂CH₃), 18.4 (CHCH₃), 21.83 (OCH₂CH₂CH₃), 41.48 (CH₂NH–), 46.88 (–CHCH₃), 55.34 (–OCH₃), 67.00 (O–CH₂CH₃), 105.65, 119.19, 126.29, 127.61, 129.00, 129.26, 133.82, 136.00, 157.78 (Ar–C), 169.92 (–C=O amide), 174.42 (–C=O ester). MS-ESI: 330.3 (M + 1). MS-EI: 330.3 (M + 1) (1%), 329.2 (M⁺) (10%), 270 (1%), 242 (1%), 212 (2%), 186 (21%), 185 (100%), 171 (9%), 169 (12%), 155.1 (3%), 152 (8%), 140.9 (11%), 114.9 (7%), 74 (5%), 55.9 (2%).

3.3. Results of Forced Degradation Stability Studies/Specificity

During the forced degradation studies, the peaks of pro-NP were found to be pure and no significant degradation of drug substance was observed in thermal, photolytic, and oxidative conditions (Table 2). During the acidic hydrolysis analysis in 0.1 N HCl and after 24 h, a 21.5% degradation occurred (Figure 3). The guidelines [21, 22] consider that amount of degradation is enough to be representative of all possible acidic hydrolysis degradation. The two possible acidic degradation products are (2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl) propanoyl)glycine ( = 2.4 min) and naproxen ( = 3.6 min) (illustrated in Figure 5). Moreover, during the alkaline hydrolysis analysis in both 0.1 N and 0.01 N NaOH at zero time, complete degradation of the drug substance occurred (Figure 4). This can only be explained by the breakdown of the ester bond in pro-NP and the formation of a soluble sodium salt. Furthermore, alkaline hydrolysis of esters is irreversible.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Chromatograms indicating acid hydrolysis degradation of pro-NP. (a) is the chromatogram of pro-NP in 0.1 N HCl at zero time. (b) is the chromatogram of pro-NP in 0.1 N HCl after 24 h. (c) is the chromatogram of a blank in the same study.

(a)

(b)

Figure 4: Chromatograms showing the complete degradation of pro-NP in (a) 0.1 N NaOH and (b) 0.01 N NaOH.

Figure 5: The degradation pathway of pro-NP.

3.4. Results of Method Validation

3.4.1. Specificity (Selectivity)

NP is an expected degradation product of pro-NP. NP seems to be the peak that elutes the closest to the drug peak; therefore, a mixture of NP : pro-NP in the ratio of 1 : 2 was prepared and injected into the HPLC. Through visual inspection alone, the observer can determine that those two peaks are well resolved; > 1.5 (Figure 6).

Figure 6: A chromatogram indicating the resolution between pro-NP and NP.

Figure 7: Calibration curve.

3.4.2. Linearity

The linearity of the method was determined at six concentration levels. A plot of peak area () against concentration (, μg/mL) was drawn for pro-NP standard solutions with 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 50 μg/mL concentrations. The results revealed an excellent correlation between the peak area and analyte concentration, as evident by the coefficient of determination, , which is greater than 0.9987. The calibration curve and its results are presented in Figure 7 and Table 3, respectively.

3.4.3. Precision

The first step in establishing precision was repeatability. The % RSD of repeatability was 1.266. The % RSD of the intraday precision evaluation was 1.203, while that of interday precision was 1.673. The % RSD values of the repeatability, intraday, and interday studies were all <2, confirming that the method is precise. Calculations of the precision data are presented in Table 4.

Table 4: Data from the precision evaluation.

Experiment number
Peak areas
% RSD

Repeatability
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3

1
482726
483990
494994
483664
1.322806

2
467668
486134
494258
495749
1.051686

3
473884
467312
487120
493997
2.869627

4
480740
468877
491463
486034
2.445337

5
469853
483700
488475
496976
1.373156

6
477899
481472
490697
484151
0.9776

% RSD

1.67

1.266338
1.728179
0.631699
1.250237
1.2

3.4.4. Robustness

In all the deliberately varied chromatographic conditions (mobile phase pH and the detection wavelength), the developed method showed satisfactory resolution (% RSD < 2), illustrating the robustness of the method (Table 6).

3.4.5. Accuracy

The accuracy was accepted based on the results of the linearity, precision, and sensitivity studies. This approach is accepted and justified by the ICH guidelines [23].

3.4.6. System Suitability

System suitability data are calculated in Table 5.

Table 5: System suitability data.

Parameter
Value

Theoretical plates
5822.588

Tailing factor
1.211

Resolution
1.586

Capacity factor
5.039

Table 6: Robustness analysis.

Parameter
Peak areas

pH
Wavelength

Normal (pH 4.0, 272 nm detection)
576794
576794

Change 1 (pH 3.7, 270 nm detection)
597818
588379

596622
585239

598154
602703

Change 2 (pH 4.3, 274 nm detection)
599370
577334

598128
573709

596365
576894

% RSD
1.342097
1.738497

3.5. Results of the Hydrolysis Study

The hydrolysis kinetics studies were carried out in aqueous buffer solutions (pH 1.2, 5.5, and 7.4) to establish the fate of the synthesized pro-NP. Under the experimental conditions, the targeted compound hydrolyzed to release the parent drug (NP) as evident by HPLC analysis. At constant pH and temperature, the reaction exhibited first-order kinetics, since plots of log concentration versus time resulted in straight lines (Figure 8). The rate constants () and the corresponding half-lives () for the prodrug were calculated (Tables 7 and 8). The half-life was calculated using the equation = 0.693/, which derives from the first-order kinetic law. In SGF, more than 20% of pro-NP was hydrolyzed after 8 h. In pH 7.4, only 2% of the drug was hydrolyzed after 8 h. In pH 5.5, the drug was found intact after 8 h, indicating complete absence of hydrolysis at that pH. The pro-NP was found to be stable in all investigated GI fluids with half-lives more than 20 hours which confirm that this prodrug will pass intact through GIT; when reaching the systemic circulation, a reasonable degradation will take place by nonspecific esterases and amidases in the liver to liberate the parent drug NP.

Table 7: The results from the hydrolysis kinetics.

Time (hours)
pH 7.4
SGF
pH 5.5

[]
log [A]
[A]
log [A]
[A]
log [A]

0
14.498
1.161308
15.912
1.201725
15.658
1.194736

0.5
14.223
1.152991
15.601
1.193152
15.586
1.192735

1
14.134
1.150265
15.41
1.187803
15.223
1.1825

2
13.895
1.142859
14.423
1.159056
15.409
1.187774

3
13.872
1.142139
13.975
1.145352
15.542
1.191507

4
13.697
1.136625
13.53
1.131298
15.171
1.181014

5
13.712
1.137101
13.052
1.115677
15.315
1.185117

6
14.099
1.149188
13.04
1.115278
15.367
1.186589

7
13.966
1.145072
12.88
1.109916
15.754
1.197391

8
14.208
1.152533
12.675
1.102948
15.998
1.204066

is for pro-NP.

Table 8: The calculated rate constants and half-lives.

pH
(hour⁻¹)
T1/2 (hours)

1.2
2.951 × 10⁻²
23.479

5.5
2.6 × 10⁻³
262.0067

7.4
2.075 × 10⁻³
333.946

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 8: Hydrolysis of pro-NP in (a) SGF, (b) pH 7.4, and (c) pH 5.5. (d) is of pro-NP in different buffer solutions.

4. Conclusion

The method developed is simple, accurate, precise, specific, and robust. Forced degradation and spiking with degradants showed that the degradants are well resolved and separated from the prodrug. Pro-NP is therefore suitable to attain the goals of oral administration since it is stable during its passage through GIT.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

V. Lohar, S. Singhal, and V. Arora, “Prodrug: approach to better drug delivery,” International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2012.

T. Elsaman, O. A. A. Aldeeb, T. Aboul-Fadl, and E. I. Hamedelneil, “Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological evaluation of certain enzymatically cleavable NSAIDs amide prodrugs,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 70, pp. 144–152, 2017.

A. M. Qandil, “Prodrugs of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), more than meets the eye: A critical review,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 17244–17274, 2012.

P. K. Halen, P. R. Murumkar, R. Giridhar, and M. R. Yadav, “Prodrug designing of NSAIDs,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 124–139, 2009.

S. Kumar, D. K. Tyagi, and A. Gupta, “Synthesis, characterization and pharmcological activity of ester prodrugs of naproxen,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 208–211, 2010.

P. C. Sharma, S. Yadav, R. Pahwa, D. Kaushik, and S. Jain, “Synthesis and evaluation of novel prodrugs of naproxen,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 648–655, 2011.

T. Elsaman and M. M. Ali, “Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) derivatives with anti-cancer activity,” American Journal of Research Communication, vol. 4, no. 4, 2016.

L. F. Wang, H. N. Chiang, and W. B. Chen, “Synthesis and properties of a naproxen polymeric prodrug,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1129–1135, 2002.

V. R. Shanbhag, A. M. Crider, R. Gokhale, A. Harpalani, and R. M. Dick, “Ester and amide prodrugs of ibuprofen and naproxen: Synthesis, anti‐inflammatory activity, and gastrointestinal toxicity,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 1992.

J. Deb, J. Majumder, S. Bhattacharyya, and S. S. Jana, “A novel naproxen derivative capable of displaying anti-cancer and anti-migratory properties against human breast cancer cells,” BMC Cancer, vol. 14, no. 1, article no. 567, 2014.

H. Azizian, Z. Mousavi, H. Faraji et al., “Arylhydrazone derivatives of naproxen as new analgesic and anti-inflammatory agents: Design, synthesis and molecular docking studies,” Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, vol. 67, pp. 127–136, 2016.

M. Thing, Y. Lu, L. Ågårdh et al., “Prolonged naproxen joint residence time after intra-articular injection of lipophilic solutions comprising a naproxen glycolamide ester prodrug in the rat,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 451, no. 1-2, pp. 34–40, 2013.

J. Rautio, T. Nevalainen, H. Taipale et al., “Piperazinylalkyl prodrugs of naproxen improve in vitro skin permeation,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 157–163, 2000.

C. Larsen, “Quantitative determination of dextran-naproxen ester pro-drugs with varying molecular weights and degrees of substitution in biological media by means of high-performance size exclusion chromatography with fluorescence detection,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1173–1181, 1989.

M. Sheha, A. Khedr, and H. Elsherief, “Biological and metabolic study of naproxen-propyphenazone mutual prodrug,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 121–130, 2002.

M. H. Helal, S. Y. Abbas, M. A. Salem, A. A. Farag, and Y. A. Ammar, “Synthesis and characterization of new types of 2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) propionamide derivatives as potential antibacterial and antifungal agents,” Medicinal Chemistry Research, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 5598–5609, 2013.

M. Spadaro, A. Bucolo, C. Ronsisvale, and G. Pappalardo, “Design, synthesis and antiinflammatory activity of novel alfa -tocopherol,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 88–95, 2009.

G. Forte, I. Chiarotto, I. Giannicchi et al., “Characterization of naproxen-polymer conjugates for drug-delivery,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 69–85, 2016.

M. Najlah, S. Freeman, D. Attwood, and A. D'Emanuele, “Synthesis, characterization and stability of dendrimer prodrugs,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 308, no. 1-2, pp. 175–182, 2006.

T. Aboul-Fadl, T. Elsaman, O. A. Al-Deeb, H. A. Ghabbour, C. S. C. Kumar, and H.-K. Fun, “Some new NSAIDs prodrugs: an efficient synthesis, spectral characterization and X-ray crystal structure studies,” Asian Journal of Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 16, pp. 5249–5254, 2014.

ICH, Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Q1A(R2), Int. Conf. Harmon, no. February, 2003.

S. Niazi, Handbook of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Formulations, CRC Press, 2009.

ICH., ICH, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Int. Conf. Harmon, no. November, 1996.