Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2902351, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2902351

Review Article

An Overview of Murine High Fat Diet as a Model for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Ahlke Heydemann1,2

¹The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
²The Center for Cardiovascular Research, Chicago, IL 60612, USA

Received 5 May 2016; Accepted 27 June 2016

Academic Editor: Zhengyuan Xia

Copyright © 2016 Ahlke Heydemann. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide epidemic, which by all predictions will only increase. To help in combating the devastating array of phenotypes associated with T2DM a highly reproducible and human disease-similar mouse model is required for researchers. The current options are genetic manipulations to cause T2DM symptoms or diet induced obesity and T2DM symptoms. These methods to model human T2DM have their benefits and their detractions. As far as modeling the majority of T2DM cases, HFD establishes the proper etiological, pathological, and treatment options. A limitation of HFD is that it requires months of feeding to achieve the full spectrum of T2DM symptoms and no standard protocol has been established. This paper will attempt to rectify the last limitation and argue for a standard group of HFD protocols and standard analysis procedures.

1. Introduction

There are a number of open issues in the HFD mouse modeling of T2DM:

(i)Will these mouse models be useful in preclinical investigations?(ii)What about the differences identified between wild type mouse strains?(iii)Why some protocols do not elicit DCM?(iv)Can the research community agree upon a common HFD feeding protocol? Comparisons between papers, genetic manipulations, and therapies will be much easier and more informative if a specific diet, length of diet, and analysis protocols can be agreed upon.

An updated murine HFD review is urgently required as 223 references for January 2016 were found on PubMed using “high fat diet and mouse” as the search term (too many to read all). The presentation of such a large and highly important body of work is daunting. The body of this review will therefore be focused upon a researcher’s point of view. The goal is that researchers will use this paper to plan their HFD protocols and to create some consistency in future experimental protocols and analysis techniques.

Due to differences in the literature, there are multiple terms that should be defined before moving forward. We will use the following convention: obesity leads to metabolic syndrome which can progress to T2DM [1]. In humans obesity is defined by a body mass index (BMI = weight/height²) of over 30 kg/m². Progression to metabolic syndrome is diagnosed when a patient has 3 of the following 5 pathologies: obesity, hypertension, fasting hyperglycemia, elevated serum triglycerides, and decreased high-density lipoprotein. Metabolic syndrome is often labeled as prediabetes. T2DM is initially defined as a patient who is insulin resistant. After years of the associated hyperinsulinemia the pancreas may falter and the patient will then also suffer from hypoinsulinemia. Type 1 diabetes is a disease of the pancreas itself. The pancreas fails to produce insulin and therefore the patient becomes hyperglycemic, but never hyperinsulinemic.

Mouse models have proven invaluable in acquiring basic knowledge about human diseases. This knowledge progresses to preclinical investigations in these same mouse models. Examples of knowledge and therapies which have progressed from basic knowledge to preclinical trials in mouse models are numerous ([2] and some examples are reviewed in [3–5]). In the obesity and T2DM fields, mouse models have proven invaluable in the basic science of the diseases by identifying the roles of inflammation, insulin resistance, fat content of the diet, pAMPK, exercise, and potential treatments. In addition, and very importantly, what has been learned from the mouse models has faithfully been carried over into the human patients [6]. These physiological similarities between the two species are due to the genetic homology between the two species [7].

One of the largest problems—or perhaps one of the most advantageous aspects—of mouse models for T2DM are the different pathologic responses between mouse strains. These differences are also apparent in many other murine models of human disease. Multiple publications have identified strain specific differences in HFD susceptibility (a few recent examples are [8–13]). The advantageous aspects of these differences lie in the pursuit of mechanisms which cause a mouse strain to be resistant to HFD pathologies and therefore provide avenues to identify targets for future therapies. However, researchers must also be aware of these phenotypic differences when making comparisons with earlier publications which have utilized different mouse strains or even different sources for a mouse strain [13].

In the HFD field there are also disparities regarding the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). Many manuscripts have identified DCM after a relatively short diet intervention [14–17] while other experiments did not identify DCM after an 8-month HFD protocol [18] or 6-month HFD protocol [19]. Some of these disparities are easily identified to lie in specific HFD formulations or specific mouse strains being utilized or even to know which characteristics of DCM are being considered for comparison. However, some of the disparities are not so easily identified and having standardized HFD protocols will aid in identifying where the differences are arising and if they are worth pursuing for increased T2DM mechanistic knowledge. For further insights into DCM the reader is revered to a recent review article [5] concerning DCM in both T1DM and T2DM mouse models.

Of further interest to researchers is that mice subjected to HFD dependably model other human conditions in addition to T2DM. Among these other diseases are those usually related to T2DM but not occurring in all patients or mice. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the progression of this disease to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are common sequela of obesity and T2DM [20]. These conditions are well modeled with murine long-term HFD strategies (reviewed in [21]). HFD has also been utilized to model chronic inflammation, which is an important pathogenic mechanism of T2DM [22] and many other diseases including aging. The HFD-mediated chronic inflammation is marked by increased TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the circulation [23]. Among the additional inflammatory diseases investigated using murine HFD are wound healing [24, 25], prostate disease [26], dysbiosis [27–29], aging [30], and Alzheimer’s [31]. The HFD mice also provide very good models for investigating exercise benefits [32] and muscle regeneration [33]. Researchers have identified that murine HFD successfully models key aspects of peripheral artery disease [34]. HFD has also been shown to decrease skeletal muscle regeneration, likely through inflammation and lipotoxicity in the muscle stem cells known as satellite cells (reviewed in [35]). Furthermore, impaired leptin signaling which occurs in HFD fed mice also decreases satellite cell proliferation [36].

The evolutionary aspects of T2DM and insulin resistance are also highly interesting. Insulin resistance occurs in many tissues, of primary importance in the skeletal muscle, liver, and heart. Using acute insulin challenge protocols described below, individual, specific tissues can be analyzed for their level of insulin resistance. The “thrifty genome” theory posits that slight insulin resistance may have had some advantage when our ancestors (and the ancestors of mice in the wild) underwent times of food scarcity [37]. This transient insulin resistant after a large meal would cause increased calorie storage for the following times of food scarcity. However, now during times of constant food overabundance in many cultures, and for the mice, the transient and slight insulin resistance has become chronic and leads to pathologies. Although recent reports do not support the theory [38–40], there must be an evolutionary reason for the maintenance of loci associated with T2DM. An additional theory presents that insulin resistance can protect the heart from excessive calories [41]. This is a very important idea when considering insulin sensitizing agents as therapy, which, if this theory is valid, would cause further cardiac damage as has been seen with rosiglitazone treatment [41, 42]. In either case, HFD in mice has been a highly effective tool in investigating the phenotypic mechanisms and therapeutic possibilities.

A number of recent publications and reviews have addressed the utility of the mouse model HFD protocol. These reviews have excellent details and I will therefore refer the reader to these details at appropriate sections, instead of being repetitive. Calligaris et al. discuss the cardiac disease phenotype of murine HFD feeding and present an important time course of phenotypic progression [18]. A recent review article presents the use of experimental models for diabetic cardiomyopathy [5]. Islam and Loots very competently present the similarities between the murine HFD model and humans suffering from T2DM [6]. Another review manuscript describes the use of HFD mice to identify factors involved in obesity resistance or sensitivity [43]. A recent review has described various metabolic phenotyping methodologies in detail [44]. In addition, a recent chapter has described the utility of mouse models for T2DM drug discovery [4]. In addition, a thorough discussion of insulin resistance in multiple tissues was recently published [45]. Therefore, these topics will not be presented here in detail.

Additional publications describe genetically engineered T2DM mouse models, which have recently been reviewed [46]. However, due to the many genes identified which cause T2DM—more than 50 genes having been identified by human GWAS studies [47]-none of these murine genetic models can model disease etiology of more than a few patients. Many of these mice faithfully recapitulate some of the T2DM phenotypes and can therefore be useful for preclinical trials and can be used to investigate specific portions of the phenotype. However, they do not model the disease etiology of the majority of patients [46]. Most T2DM humans have become sick due to their diets, not their genetics (CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/faqs.html). Therefore the HFD is the most appropriate disease model [18].

2. Considerations for Designing a High Fat Diet Protocol

There are many important considerations for designing a murine HFD protocol (Table 1). The most important is perhaps the duration of the HFD. Other considerations are the age of the mice and formulation of the HFD. As discussed, which mouse strain to use is also highly important to consider when designing a HFD protocol.

Table 1: Considerations for designing a high fat diet protocol.

Notes
References#

Design

    Length of diet
Adaptive (<1 week)

Acute (<2 weeks)

Chronic (>8 weeks)

    Formulation
Matching Human Western Diet

Accentuate pathology

    Age
Pathologies intensify with age

    Gender
Males are predominantly used to avoid the female cycles

    Strain
Hyperglycemia susceptible: C57Bl/6J (C57Bl/6N healthier than C57Bl/6J after HFD), DBA2/J, BXD66
[12, 13, 48–50]

Hyperglycemia resistant: MRL, Lrg, A/J, BXD77, BALB/cJ

Assessments

    Weights
Whole body and specific tissues: different adipocyte sites, liver, heart

    Weekly blood glucose
Fasting versus fed, time of day

    Echocardiography

    Blood pressure
PV loops versus noninvasive

    Glucose TT
Fasting versus fed, time of day, acute versus long term
[44, 51]

Glucose delivery: oral, IP, or IV

    Insulin TT
Fasting versus fed, time of day, acute versus long term

    Serum collection
Fasting versus fed, time of day

    DEXA
Allows time course of body composition

    NMR
Allows time course of body composition, more reliable than DEXA
[44]

    Histology
Fibrosis, picrosirius red, periodic acid shift, immune infiltrate, adipocyte, skeletal muscle, cardiac cell size

    Fibrosis
TGFβ, pSMAD2/3, αSMA, IL6, IL13, IL33
[48]

Additional phenotypes

    Hyperglycemic clamp
Identifies glucose sensitivity, by measuring serum insulin levels
[44]

    Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
Considerations are time of clamp and how tightly to regulate the glucose infusions
[44, 52, 53]

Determines glucose use

    Tissue specific glucose uptake
Used in conjunction with the above clamp techniques
[44]

Requires an MRI and radioactively labeled energy sources

Much easier in rats

Determines insulin sensitivity in multiple tissues

    Inflammation
Flow cytometry for specific cell types
[48]

Histology can also identify specific cells

Cytokine levels in serum or tissue extracts

    Liver, NAFLD
Aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase

Progression of disease: steatosis > steatohepatitis > cirrhosis > HCC

    Electron micrographs
Analyze mitochondria and lipid storage sites in detail

TT, tolerance test; DEXA, duel-energy X-ray absorptiometry; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IP, intraperitoneal; IV, intravenous; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. #References are given where inappropriate.

We investigated many manuscripts and identified many different durations for diet intervention; the most commonly utilized times are listed in Table 2. Clearly this wide array of times (and diet specifics and age at start) makes interstudy comparisons very difficult. Early during diet intervention (<1 week) we expect an adaptation phase. Such an early adaptation phase was noted in the HFD fed wild type MRL mouse strain after 2 and 3 weeks of HFD [12]. The MRL mice became slightly hyperglycemic at these early weeks, which they fully recovered from by 7 weeks of diet. After a certain HFD length we expect some parameters to have achieved a plateau. Such plateaus are evident for weekly hyperglycemia values and weight gain [12]. However some very important disease parameters will continue to worsen. Examples of continuing pathogenic characteristics are insulin resistance [60], inflammation [48], and cardiac remodeling [18].

Table 2: Common diet durations.

Duration
Key findings
References#

12 weeks
Identified diabetic symptoms in wild type C57BL/6 mice: these were not found in the wild type MRL mice.
[12]

Identified diabetic cardiomyopathy symptoms in wild type C57BL/6 mice: these were not found in the wild type MRL cardiac tissue.
[16]

Identified sulforaphane (an antioxidant) decreases diabetic cardiomyopathy in a HFD plus streptozotocin model.
[54]

16 weeks
In WT C57BL/6 HFD increased LVW by 21%.
In WT C57BL/6 HFD increased liver weight by 86%.
[55]

12-, 16-, and 20-week comparisons
Epididymal AT death peaks at 16 weeks of HFD, compared to 12 and 20 weeks. This is coincident with a peak of AT macrophages. Inguinal AT death was less pronounced at all times tested.
[56]

24 weeks
Identified that a Th1 immune response caused mice to be more susceptible to HFD pathologies.
[48]

8-, 12-, and 16-month comparisons
At 8 months hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and hypercholesterolemia and insulin resistance were found. Cardiac remodeling by echo was also identified. At 16 months the authors also report cardiac metabolic compensations and tissue remodeling in the form of fibrosis and hypertrophy.
[18]

8-, 30-, and 60-week comparisons
NAFLD and HCC established at 30 weeks and significant liver pathology observed at 8 weeks of HFD.
[21, 57]

6 and 16 weeks
Identified liver pathology only at 16 weeks and only in males.
[58]

6 weeks
Increased LV mass and reduced FS.
[59]

AT, adipose tissue; FS, fractional shortening; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LV, left ventricle; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. #References are given where inappropriate.

The earliest HFD effects we found in the literature were after 3 days of diet as an increase of pancreatic β-cell proliferation [60]. These authors also followed a time course through 11 weeks of HFD which revealed important differences between early (1 week) and late (11 weeks) results in intraperitoneal GTT and the dynamics of disease progression. Insulin tolerance also progressively worsened over the time course, while hyperinsulinemia was only apparent at 11 weeks of diet and was not seen at 1 or 5 weeks of diet [60]. This is a great illustration that the length of time of HFD must be carefully considered depending upon which variables one is interested in investigating. Furthermore, the above-mentioned early adaptation phase seen in the MRL mice did not occur in the HFD fed C57Bl/6 mice, again stressing the importance of choosing the correct mouse strain depending upon the desired investigations.

Continuing data is being generated indicating gender differences in response to HFD protocols. For example, male mice are more susceptible to hyperglycemia from HFD [61]. Others have identified adipocyte baseline differences that is in wild type mice fed a normal diet between male and female mice in glucose metabolism [62]. In a highly comprehensive study Morselli et al. identified that due to HFD changes in the C57Bl/6 male hypothalamus the male mice were more susceptible to HFD-mediated chronic inflammation, while the female mice gained as much weight; they did not suffer from the pathogenic inflammation [63]. Similarly, it has been identified that multiple fat deposits in C57Bl/6T female mice and castrated male mice are more insulin sensitive than those from intact male mice [62]. These differences must be taken advantage of to find novel therapeutic targets.

It is well known that age-related chronic inflammation correlates strongly with insulin resistance [64]. As T2DM is still considered a disease of the elderly it is fully appropriate to analyze older mice. However, unless one is contrasting age, comparisons with younger mice must be made with caution.

A great example of the variable responses of different mouse strains to a HFD was recently published [48]. The authors compared the C57Bl/6 mouse strain, containing a typical Th1 leaning immune system, to the BALB/c mouse strain which is a Th2 leaning strain. Liver phenotypes and immune responses were assessed. The authors identified that the C57Bl/6 mice were more susceptible to adiposity, liver inflammation, and liver fibrosis. Alternatively, the BALB/c mice were more susceptible to liver steatosis. Furthermore, slight genetic differences due to genetic drift result in significant differences between mouse substrains [13, 65, 66]. These authors compared C57Bl/6J to C57Bl/6N substrains [13]. These strains were physically separated in 1951 and kept in different facilities since then. As no selection pressure was applied the current genetic differences are purely due to genetic drift. The C57Bl/6J strain has a mutation in nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase [67]. The strains are different in the severity of HFD-induced characteristics; the C57Bl/6N strain has a milder phenotype [13]. Another advanced genetic analysis was conducted on some of the BXD mouse strains (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J intercrosses for 20 plus generations,). These authors identified strains that were susceptible and resistant to hippocampal dysfunction elicited by HFD [49]. The advantage of this strategy is that genome wide association studies and additional genetic analyses will be very informative due to the complex but known sequences [68].

A further caution must be mentioned for the variations in diet compositions particularly important in light of continued data that the type of the fat is critically important to provide protection or pathology [69]. The complete review of diets is beyond the scope of this review; here are a few important points to consider. In the United States there are a few main suppliers of main suppliers of lab diets: Teklad (http://Envigo.com/), LabDiet/Purina (http://labdiet.com/), Research Diets (http://ResearchDiets.com/), and Bio-Serve (http://Bio-serve.com/). Teklad has two main HFD options with 2 modifications for one of them. In addition, Teklad provides many fat additives to custom make diets with specific lipid types. We could find two HFD in the LabDiet web pages. Research Diets sells 8 different HFD formulations. Bio-Serve sells one HFD formulation. Not only are the amount and type of fat important but also the grams of carbohydrate in each formulation are highly important to consider. As mentioned before a true “Western Diet” would have high fat and high carbohydrate.

Diets high in saturated fatty acids are more obesogenic than mono- and polyunsaturated as the saturated fatty acids are inefficiently used for energy production and are therefore more readily stored [70]. Furthermore, long-chain fatty acids (C14:0–C24:0) are more obesogenic than short- and medium-chain because they are transported into the mitochondria less readily and are therefore more likely to be stored [70]. A very interesting study regarding diet composition came from the laboratory of Ezaki. These scientists balanced carbohydrate with different lipid percentages in an isocaloric diet and demonstrated a clear correlation between lipid content and hyperglycemia [71]. As calories from lipid increased and carbohydrate calories decreased to keep total calories constant, the glucose tolerance of the mice deteriorated. Similarly, Maiolo et al. recently published comparisons of a HFD versus high sugar diet versus a diet of high fat and high sugar [72]. The results demonstrate that the combined high fat and sugar diet presented with most severe symptoms, including hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and higher levels of inflammatory mediators and lower levels of regulatory T cells. As we are all trying to improve patient lives the diet that best approximates the true Western Diet (high fat and high sugar) is arguably the best diet to use, unless diet specifics are being investigated.

Many researchers use a straightforward HFD in their protocols, but some utilize additional stressors to model human T2DM. An additional stressor is a low dose streptozotocin injection to boost the disease severity and model a later more progressed stage of disease after hyperinsulinemia when hypoinsulinemia has appeared [54, 73, 74]. The dose of streptozotocin does not cause any phenotypes in chow fed mice and does not always cause DCM in HFD mice. Additionally, to compensate for the additional calories provided by the HFD, some scientists have calorie that matched the amount of HFD given to their mouse cohort [75, 76]. In this way the HFD mice are only allowed to consume the same amount of calories as the CD cohort consumed in the previous 24 hours. These variations provide very useful protocols to investigate different and specific aspects of T2DM.

Although there has been speculation that sucrose with or without fat should also cause T2DM, this has not been found. In humans there is retrospective epidemiological evidence that sucrose is not causative to T2DM [77]. In mice, where the experiment can be conducted with all of the proper controls, sucrose did not alter the progression to T2DM with or without a HFD component [50]. Therefore a straightforward HFD may be the optimum diet to model early T2DM in mice with an additional streptozotocin injection to model the later stages of disease when hypoinsulinemia is also present.

3. Pathogenic Mechanisms

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the murine HFD model are complex diseases with complex and overlapping pathogenic mechanisms (Figure 1). The overlapping nature of these mechanisms clearly causes researchers and clinicians anxiety when thinking about prevention and treatment strategies. For example, many patients with normoglycemia still develop downstream pathologies. Alternatively, some patients with chronically poor glucose control do not develop downstream pathologies. It is therefore clear that once T2DM is present, additional therapeutics beyond glucose control are required. Targets for the additional therapeutics require the consideration of many T2DM and HFD pathogenic mechanisms.

Figure 1: An illustration of the positive feedback nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus and murine high fat diet. Both humans and mice continue around this circle at an increasing level of pathology until they acquire one or more of the irreversible disease outcomes at the bottom of the illustration.

The direct effects of hyperglycemia upon tissues are still being fully elucidated. It appears that endothelial cells are highly sensitive to chronic hyperglycemia most possibly due to their constant proximity to the circulation. Generally it may be that the body’s fuel storage cells (primarily adipose and liver cells) adapt to hyperglycemia through decreasing levels of insulin sensitivity. It may be that what is viewed as the most pathogenic portion of the disease is actually a beneficial adaptation to hyperglycemia [41]. This view is supported through evolutionary history during which humans were subjected to periods of feast or famine and during times of feast the extra calories needed to be stored in glycogen and fat deposits not utilized immediately for ATP production [78]. By temporarily shifting the insulin receptors to resistance the storage pathway would be enhanced. However, now we (humans and mice on a chronic HFD) no longer have the famine times and the resulting chronic hyperglycemia is toxic at many levels.

3.1. Lipotoxicity

At the onset of a HFD the murine adipose tissue adequately expands and stores the excess calories [56]. However, during chronic HFD the adipose tissue can no longer store the excess calories and the excess lipids are deposited into other organs. This can lead to disruption of normal cellular processes and then also to frank lipotoxicity where the excessive lipid molecules damage cellular molecules. Lipotoxicity occurs in multiple tissues post-HFD protocols: heart, skeletal muscle, liver pancreas, and kidneys. The definition of this pathology can be considered an imbalance in lipid uptake and disposal leading to an accumulation of lipid intermediates in nonadipose cells, which causes impaired cellular function. Excessive lipids appear to cause stress responses often leading to apoptosis and replacement of functioning cells with fibroblasts and extracellular matrix.

3.2. Metabolic Inflexibility

It is currently thought that healthy individuals with a varied diet and adequate exercise can adapt to their caloric source, such that eating a few HFD meals in a row will not produce any pathology. However, after chronic HFD mice and individuals become metabolically inflexible [79]. For example, cardiac tissue often responds to HFD by increasing its carbohydrate utilizing proteins to extract as much energy from glucose as possible [16, 18]. However when the diet then switches to a normal diet the heart draws too many calories from glucose causing a pathologic excessive caloric intake [41].

3.3. Inflammation

Inflammation is a central pathogenic mediator in all aspects of T2DM and murine HFD-induced pathologies including the cardiovascular system [80–82]. Low level chronic inflammation is identified in both T2DM and HFD mice [83]. Immune response time courses are also required as it has been shown that continued immune responses are pathogenic in many disease models, including T2DM [84]. As inflammation is also associated with many age-related diseases and conditions it becomes doubly critical in the older population historically affected by T2DM.

Multiple factors within the immune system are implicated in T2DM pathogenesis [22]. Jovicic et al. demonstrated that mice with a Th2 leaning immune response (BALB/c) are spared many of the HFD-induced pathologies, while mice leaning towards a Th1 immune response are susceptible to many HFD pathologies [48]. Infiltrating macrophages are known to be involved in pathogenesis [83].

3.4. Excessive Reactive Oxygen Species

A major contributor to HFD-induced DCM is hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress [85, 86]. Hyperglycemia directly causes ROS production and apoptosis in H9c2 cells [87]. Furthermore, the mitochondrial dysfunction could be partially restored with a pharmaceutically applied antioxidant [88].

3.5. Decreased Autophagy

Extensive recent publications describe decreased autophagy [89, 90] and in particular mitophagy [91] as pathogenic in T2DM and HFD mouse models. Increasing autophagy can alleviate many of the HFD-mediated pathologies [92, 93]. This is clearly an ongoing and interesting research area in the HFD mice.

3.6. Altered Mitochondrial Morphology and Function due to Decreased Insulin Signaling

In diabetic humans hyperglycemia is thought to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and fragmentation, thereby linking hyperglycemia, mitochondrial dysfunction, and temporary insulin resistance characteristics in cardiomyocytes before obvious pathology [94]. There is significant new data that the insulin signaling cascade directly impacts cardiac mitochondrial fission and fusion (reviewed in [95]). This data arises from a number of observations in knock-out mouse models and cultured cardiomyocytes in which disrupted mitochondrial morphology and function precede T2DM [96]. The beneficial effects of metformin on increasing mitochondrial function and volume [97] are also consistent with mitochondrial pathology being pathogenic for T2DM.

4. Pathology Assessments

Common human T2DM and mouse HFD pathologies are as follows:

(i)Weight gain.(ii)Hyperglycemia.(iii)Hyperinsulinemia followed by hypoinsulinemia.(iv)Insulin resistance.(v)Increased fasting leptin levels.(vi)Decreased fasting adiponectin levels.(vii)Inflammation with increases in inflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species.(viii)Fatty lipid droplet accumulation in multiple tissues.(ix)Fibrosis in multiple tissues.(x)Increases in blood pressure, but not always seen in the mouse models.

There are many assays to quantify the extent of these pathologies in the HFD mouse model (Table 1). All of these assays have been described in detail, so I will just highlight some of the important considerations that may be overlooked by busy investigators and direct you to the pertinent references. Based upon my own limited experience many of these assays should be done weekly. We have noticed an adaptation phase in the first few weeks of HFD [12], which we now wish we had analyzed more closely instead of beginning another cohort of animals through the long and costly procedure. Therefore, all of the nonterminal procedures, weight gain, blood glucose, insulin, adiponectin, echocardiography, DEXA, and blood pressure (noninvasive tail cuff), should be conducted weekly. A few intervening dates should also be selected for tissue collection. Terminal assays that should be considered at these intervening dates are liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose deposits for weighing, histology, and immunoblot analysis. Interesting results would include identifying changes in molecules used by the tissues in attempts at adaptation. For example changes in enzymes and molecules controlling glucose and lipid metabolic rates would be of interest to investigate early in the HFD protocol.

A recent chapter from Baribault describes the GTT, ITT, insulin secretion tests, nonesterified free fatty acid quantification, body composition, and terminal harvesting techniques [4]. As this chapter appears in Methods in Molecular Biology and contains protocol details we will not repeat these descriptions here.

Although many of these tests appear straightforward some additional considerations are important. Animal mass can be reported as absolute or relative to CD mice or relative to beginning masses. There are pros and cons to each reporting method. Perhaps the most accurate is comparing the ratio of the animal’s final weight to the animal’s own beginning weight, such that the animal serves as its own control. However, using this method may not be the optimum method to compare between sexes or mouse strains where an absolute change would be optimal.

Another consideration for many of these tests is the time of day performed and if any fasting is required. As mice are nocturnal many of their diurnal cycling hormones and activities would be opposite of those found in humans. Therefore, as with all biological experiments the time of day must be kept consistent. Multiple publications discuss the appropriate length of fasting to achieve the most accurate data for various tests. Fasting is required to minimize variation and therefore minimize the number of animals needed to uncover differences. Fasting is usually used with the basal blood glucose measurements, GTT, ITT, and acute ITT. Fasting overnight is more extreme than fasting in the daylight hours. I have found the discussion given by Dr. Andrikopoulos et al. extremely helpful [51]. These authors empirically identified 6 hours of fasting and 2 g/kg of oral glucose as the most informative assay parameters. The most often used insulin dose is 1 mU/g of Humalog (E. L. Lilly, Indianapolis) for ITT [4, 12].

Another important set of characteristics can be achieved using insulin and glucose clamp experiments. These experiments require additional equipment and are not high-throughput. In brief, for a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, the animals receive a basal insulin delivery (3 mU/min/kg) which is a commonly used dose for rats [98] and the amount of glucose required to keep the blood sugar in a certain range is quantified. These studies quantify insulin sensitivity better because they circumvent the counterregulatory responses associated with ITT. Additionally, a hyperglycemic clamp technique can also be used. Clamp techniques are often used in conjunction with labeled glucose so that individual tissues can be analyzed for glucose uptake.

Various methods can be used to determine the body composition of mice. The most high-throughput method is simply weighing some of the various fat masses and comparing this to the animal’s body mass, both measurements should be determined anyway as part of the harvesting protocol. The next upgrade is to utilize DEXA measurements on all or a consistent portion of the mouse. This technique has the added bonus that it is not a terminal procedure and a time course can be constructed for each animal. The gold standard for body composition is an MRI. This also benefits from being amenable to establish a time course, although it is the furthest from high-throughput of the three methods and may also be expensive.

5. Tissues Affected by HFD

Human type 2 diabetes mellitus is truly a systemic, multiorgan disease and each of these organs is also negatively affected in mouse models on a HFD. The mouse organs affected each are being investigated to gain pathologic and therapeutic knowledge into the disease. The ultimate goal is to identify therapeutics which reduce all systemic and organ pathologies. In this section additional, tissue-specific analysis methods will also be listed and referenced or discussed.

5.1. Adipose Tissues

Adipose tissue pathology is at the forefront of HFD investigations and the subsequent pathologies. Extensive data identifies that adipose inflammation, including secretion of adipokines and activation of adipose resident macrophages, is pathogenic for all other tissues and organs [99]. The different types of adipose tissues should be considered separately [62]. It is indicated that visceral white fat is the most pathogenic type because it secretes large amounts of adipocytokines such as leptin, TNFα, IL6, and adiponectin that can disrupt homeostasis when dysregulated due to HFD [45]. As the visceral fat undergoes hypertrophy and perhaps hyperplasia it secretes more of these potentially unhealthy adipocytokines. Subcutaneous adipose tissue also secretes the adipocytokines but in smaller quantities so this adipose site is not as frequently studied. The adipocytokines are reliably measured by serum or tissue extract enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAS). The weights of the various adipose deposits are also very important to obtain at harvest time.

Interesting work is also coming forward from fat deposit transplantation studies. Relatively small amounts (0.1 mg) of brown adipose tissue were transplanted into the visceral cavity of HFD recipients. Eight weeks after surgery the recipients had significant improvements in glucose tolerance and at 12 weeks the recipients had significant improvements in insulin tolerance tests [100]. A detailed review of brown adipose tissue physiology assessment has recently been published [101] and will therefore not be repeated here.

Insulin resistance in adipose tissues is pathogenic for the remainder of the organism. Adipocytes usually respond to insulin by dividing, increasing glucose uptake, and inhibiting lipolysis [45]. When the cells become insulin resistant due to HFD the body is subjected to increased levels of hyperglycemia and lipotoxicity because of the excessive lipolysis.

5.2. Skeletal Muscle

As skeletal muscle is the primary tissue for glucose disposal, its insulin resistance is systemically pathogenic. Skeletal muscle also provides one of the best methods to cure T2DM through increasing exercise and disposing of glucose in an insulin independent manner, thus by passing the pathology and reestablishing homeostasis. For these reasons investigating and treating the skeletal muscles of HFD mice are critically important.

Skeletal muscle of HFD mice succumbs to many of the above-mentioned pathologies: insulin resistance, lipotoxicity from excessive lipid storage, and inflammation. Insulin resistance can be measured with an acute ITT, fifteen minutes after an insulin bolus (1 mU/g); skeletal muscle is harvested and immunoblots are used to determine the levels of phosphorylated pAkt at T³⁰⁸ and S⁴⁷³ [45]. Insulin resistant tissues produce less pAkt and this appears to be a linear relationship so that the degrees of insulin resistance can be quantified [45]. Other downstream targets of the insulin receptors can also be monitored for insulin signaling, although specificity of insulin signaling must be considered during data analysis [45]. Increased lipid levels can be analyzed by a number of methods. Histologically the Oil Red O stains can be used to quantify cellular lipid droplets. The gold standard is perhaps by electron microscopy so that lipid droplet location can also be determined. Lipid droplets in the mitochondria [12, 16] versus cytoplasmically located [102] would reveal specific pathologic mechanisms. Inflammation and specific cells of the invading immune system can be measured by histology or flow cytometry.

5.3. Liver

The liver of HFD mice is negatively affected in a number of ways [21, 103]. As with many HFD-elicited diseases the liver pathology is progressive. The pathology usually begins with patchy steatosis/fatty droplet accumulation (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)), inflammation (pathogenic cytokines and ROS release), fibrosis, hepatocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia, more global steatosis (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)), liver mass gain, cirrhosis, and finally hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The usefulness of a long-term HFD to model the steps of this disease progression is discussed in a review by Kanuri and Bergheim [103].

The HFD liver is also systemically pathogenic. Insulin usually reduces hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. Therefore, in an insulin resistant animal or T2DM patient the liver actually makes and secretes more glucose than normal [104]. In an organism that is already hyperglycemic the liver adds even more sugar to the blood stream. Insulin signaling in the liver also increases lipogenesis. However, due to “selective insulin resistance” this signaling pathway is not inhibited during times of systemic insulin resistance and therefore the liver inappropriately produces lipids in response to the hyperinsulinemia in the later stages of disease [105]. In addition, a large proportion of a health body’s readily available lipid is stored in the liver; the liver is therefore highly susceptible to lipotoxicity.

Of interest is that full liver pathology—HCC—requires a long HFD protocol to be established; at 60 weeks of HFD still only 54% of the mice displayed HCC [21]. In addition, liver cirrhosis in mice is rarely detected [21]. However, this HFD model is still very useful in liver pathology and treatment investigations. For example, long-term (60 weeks) HFD feeding establishes NAFLD, including the HCC, in just over half of the HFD C57Bl/6 mice [21]. The group went on to use this HFD mouse model, at multiple HFD durations, to demonstrate the preclinical efficacy of metformin treatment in reducing HCC if the treatment starts coincident with the diet, but not if metformin treatment is begun after NAFLD has begun to develop [57]. These authors also compared various time points of diet duration and treatment to elucidate the mechanisms behind metformin cancer reduction.

The progression of different liver pathologies can be evaluated in a number of ways. Histology is very useful to identify the stage of disease progression and to quantify the degree of pathology. Histology can identify amount of excessive lipid storage, steatosis, and HCC. The liver is also well studied by the acute ITT to quantify its level of insulin resistance.

5.4. Cardiac

As many T2DM patients die of cardiomyopathy without vessel disease or hypertension, investigating diabetic cardiomyopathies is of high importance [106]. Multiple studies have investigated the effects of HFD upon cardiac function, remodeling, and metabolism. Mice fed a HFD for 10 weeks develop myocardial insulin resistance evidenced by a downregulation of insulin receptor activity, downregulation of AKT signaling, and increased fatty acid oxidation [107].

Lipid accumulation in the heart occurs when lipid intake exceeds lipid metabolism. It is exacerbated in chronic (HFD) situations and obesity when the body is overwhelmed by free fatty acids (FFA). Even though the heart metabolizes lipids for 60–80% of its total basal energy it will store excess FFA and metabolites. Abnormal accumulation of nonoxidative lipid derivatives leads to increased apoptotic signaling, oxidative stress, and broad cellular dysfunction in the heart [108]. Overwhelming evidence indicates that the type of ingested fat is critically important for its place in the pathogenic or protective spectrum (reviewed in [69]). This is especially evident in the effects of particular fats in the diets on cardiac function. For example, a diet high in saturated fats is protective in muscular dystrophy mediated cardiomyopathy in hamsters [109].

Rodent HFD models of T2DM also reproduce the “obesity paradox,” initially identified in humans [110]. The situation is labeled a paradox because obese patients are better at overcoming long-term damage after myocardial infarctions. In rats subjected to pressure-overload hypertrophy, those receiving HFD are protected from cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction [69]. Furthermore, mice on a HFD have less postinfarct myocardial remodeling and dysfunction compared to normal diet controls [111]. The similarities between the human diseases and the rodent models facilitate investigations into the mechanisms of this paradox and identify if it can be leveraged for human therapeutics.

Multiple investigations failed to identify cardiac pathologies after long-term HFD feeding. For example, in a 6-month HFD study the investigators did not find any cardiac pathology by echocardiography [19]. Alternatively, other investigators have identified pathologies within shorter HFD protocols. For example, in a 12-week HFD study we identified cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, unsuccessful metabolic adaptations, and lipid droplet accumulation [16]. These results indicate that caution must be used when designing HFD experiments, especially for diabetic cardiomyopathy assessments. It may be that in these long-term experiments the hearts have compensated fully and have established a new homeostasis and the pathology must be evaluated over a time course. This is an interesting point requiring further study, because such compensatory mechanisms may reveal therapeutic targets. A very interesting study was conducted by Calligaris et al. These authors compared 8, 12, and 16 months of HFD on the C57Bl/6 male hearts. They identified cardiac remodeling at all time points, which became more severe as the diet duration was extended. In the HFD group they identified functional pathology, but only after dobutamine pharmacological stress [18].

There are a number of possible reasons for the discrepancies regarding HFD-induced DCM. Some of the reasons are easily identified: different diets (fat type is highly important, W. C. Stanley), diet duration, different assays, and age of animals. Some of the harder to identify reasons are genetic drift, seasonal variation, and diurnal variation in time of assays. When designing a HFD protocol these variations each must be considered and minimized as much as possible.

The heart must be further evaluated by a number of unique methods [5]. Cardiac pathology assessments are critically important to obtain due to the large number of T2DM patients dying from heart failure [106]. Echocardiography (Echo) is an essential assessment method for T2DM. Echo indicates morphometric hypertrophy and dilation and provides information on cardiac function. DCM is defined as reduced cardiac function without hypertension or vessel disease. Therefore, blood pressure is also a key assessment for DCM. Generally, hypertension is not identified in HFD mouse models [16]. However, this needs to be assessed for each experiment. Blood pressure values can be quantified by either terminal (pressure volume loops (PV loops)) or survival (tail cuff) techniques. The tail cuff procedure benefits from being survival, relatively high-throughput, and inexpensive while the PV loops benefit from being more accurate and accepted by reviewers. The best possible scenario would be to perform tail cuff weekly throughout the HFD protocol and perform the terminal PV loops at the termination of the procedure.

Hypertrophy is a common sequela of HFD. Hypertrophy can occur in two distinct or overlapping characteristics at the organ level and/or cellular level. The organ level hypertrophy can be assessed with Echo and heart weight to tibia length and the cellular hypertrophy can be assessed by histology methods and ImageJ [16].

5.5. Pancreas

The pancreas is also affected by the HFD. The hyperglycemia caused by the HFD signals the pancreas to secrete more and more insulin. Eventually the pancreas falters and hyperinsulinemia is followed by hypoinsulinemia. These changes in insulin levels are seen in patients and in mice fed a HFD.

Of course, because T2DM is a systemic disease, all cells and tissues are affected by the disease-defining hyperglycemia and lipotoxicity [45]. Principal among these cell types would be endothelial cells, neurons, and beta cells of the pancreas.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

The HFD mice have proven invaluable not only for the identification of molecular pathways affected by HFD, but also in preclinical protocols to test potential therapies to reverse the condition and its many associated pathologies [4]. As the research community identifies the most human-like HFD model the strength of using this model for preclinical protocols can only become better.

Many therapeutics are being tested in the HFD protocol. Recently resveratrol (RSV, red grape extract) has come into the news as being antiaging and potentially inhibiting T2DM symptoms. When given for the 12 weeks of HFD, RSV produced only a slight reduction of body weight and blood glucose but had a significant reduction on renal fibrosis and renal dysfunction [112]. Through further experiments, the authors attributed the benefits to inflammation reduction. Other pharmacologies that have been tested in the HFD protocol include metformin, ezetimibe, acarbose, and atorvastatin.

As the research community approaches the ideal HFD protocol, consistent protocols will be undeniably helpful. As stated previously this would enable ease when comparing study to study, especially important for the preclinical therapeutic trials. I will now go out on a limb and steel myself for the upcoming onslaught of detractors. I propose this following standard protocol:

(i)Using C57Bl/6J.(ii)Feeding from 4 to 20 weeks old.(iii)Using both male and female mice.(iv)Using a HFD plus high fructose to mimic the human diet best.

This protocol can be used to compare the many therapeutics. It can be also modified to study specific mouse strains, exercise, age, length of diet, and so forth. For example, it would be of great interest to compare young and old mice in a HFD protocol. Although older mice do not have the high levels of chronic inflammation as found in the aged human population, it would be of interest to establish if the older mice develop T2DM symptoms at a shorter HFD time period.

Abbreviations

AITT: | Acute insulin tolerance test
AGTT: | Acute glucose tolerance test
B6: | The C57Bl/6J mouse strain from Jackson Labs
DCM: | Diabetic cardiomyopathy
DM: | Diabetic mellitus
HCC: | Hepatocellular carcinoma
HFD: | High fat diet
GTT: | Glucose tolerance test
ITT: | Insulin tolerance test
NAFLD: | Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
RSV: | Resveratrol
T2DM: | Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Additional Points

This is a guide to plan your high fat diet mouse experiments.

Competing Interests

The author declares there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

G. M. Reaven, “The insulin resistance syndrome: definition and dietary approaches to treatment,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 25, pp. 391–406, 2005.

L. A. Katunga, P. Gudimella, J. T. Efird et al., “Obesity in a model of gpx4 haploinsufficiency uncovers a causal role for lipid-derived aldehydes in human metabolic disease and cardiomyopathy,” Molecular Metabolism, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 493–506, 2015.

I. Raz, R. Eldor, S. Cernea, and E. Shafrir, “Diabetes: insulin resistance and derangements in lipid metabolism. Cure through intervention in fat transport and storage,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2005.

H. Baribault, “Mouse models of type II diabetes mellitus in drug discovery,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 602, pp. 135–155, 2010.

J. Fuentes-Antras, B. Picatoste, A. Gomez-Hernandez, J. Egido, J. Tunon, and O. Lorenzo, “Updating experimental models of diabetic cardiomyopathy,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 656795, 15 pages, 2015.

M. S. Islam and D. T. Loots, “Experimental rodent models of type 2 diabetes: a review,” Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 249–261, 2009.

L. Peltonen and V. A. McKusick, “Genomics and medicine: dissecting human disease in the postgenomic era,” Science, vol. 291, no. 5507, pp. 1224–1229, 2001.

A. Dogan, P. Lasch, C. Neuschl et al., “ATR-FTIR spectroscopy reveals genomic loci regulating the tissue response in high fat diet fed BXD recombinant inbred mouse strains,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article 386, 2013.

M. Kahle, M. Horsch, B. Fridrich et al., “Phenotypic comparison of common mouse strains developing high-fat diet-induced hepatosteatosis,” Molecular Metabolism, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 435–446, 2013.

E. K. Sims, M. Hatanaka, D. L. Morris et al., “Divergent compensatory responses to high-fat diet between C57BL6/J and C57BLKS/J inbred mouse strains,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 305, no. 12, pp. E1495–E1511, 2013.

M. Kobayashi, T. Ohno, K. Ihara et al., “Searching for genomic region of high-fat diet-induced type 2 diabetes in mouse chromosome 2 by analysis of congenic strains,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e96271, 2014.

A. J. Mull, T. K. Berhanu, N. W. Roberts, and A. Heydemann, “The Murphy Roths Large (MRL) mouse strain is naturally resistant to high fat diet-induced hyperglycemia,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 1577–1586, 2014.

D. A. Fontaine and D. B. Davis, “Attention to background strain is essential for metabolic research: c57bl/6 and the international knockout mouse consortium,” Diabetes, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2015.

I. Abdesselam, P. Pepino, T. Troalen et al., “Time course of cardiometabolic alterations in a high fat high sucrose diet mice model and improvement after GLP-1 analog treatment using multimodal cardiovascular magnetic resonance,” Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, vol. 17, article 95, 2015.

S. Carbone, A. G. Mauro, E. Mezzaroma et al., “A high-sugar and high-fat diet impairs cardiac systolic and diastolic function in mice,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 198, pp. 66–69, 2015.

N. W. Roberts, M. González-Vega, T. K. Berhanu, A. Mull, J. García, and A. Heydemann, “Successful metabolic adaptations leading to the prevention of high fat diet-induced murine cardiac remodeling,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 14, no. 1, article 127, 2015.

J. Villarroya, I. Redondo-Angulo, R. Iglesias, M. Giralt, F. Villarroya, and A. Planavila, “Sirt1 mediates the effects of a short-term high-fat diet on the heart,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1328–1337, 2015.

S. D. Calligaris, M. Lecanda, F. Solis et al., “Mice long-term high-fat diet feeding recapitulates human cardiovascular alterations: an animal model to study the early phases of diabetic cardiomyopathy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e60931, 2013.

R. E. Brainard, L. J. Watson, A. M. DeMartino et al., “High fat feeding in mice is insufficient to induce cardiac dysfunction and does not exacerbate heart failure,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83174, 2013.

M. Lazo and J. M. Clark, “The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 339–350, 2008.

A. Nakamura and Y. Terauchi, “Lessons from mouse models of high-fat diet-induced NAFLD,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 21240–21257, 2013.

R. Cancello and K. Clément, “Is obesity an inflammatory illness? Role of low-grade inflammation and macrophage infiltration in human white adipose tissue,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113, no. 10, pp. 1141–1147, 2006.

M. F. Gregor and G. S. Hotamisligil, “Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 29, pp. 415–445, 2011.

Z. Hu, H. Wang, I. H. Lee et al., “PTEN inhibition improves muscle regeneration in mice fed a high-fat diet,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1312–1320, 2010.

O. Seitz, C. Schürmann, N. Hermes et al., “Wound healing in mice with high-fat diet- or ob gene-induced diabetes-obesity syndromes: a comparative study,” Experimental Diabetes Research, vol. 2010, Article ID 476969, 15 pages, 2010.

E. Shankar, N. Bhaskaran, G. T. MacLennan, G. Liu, F. Daneshgari, and S. Gupta, “Inflammatory signaling involved in high-fat diet induced prostate diseases,” Journal of Urology and Research, vol. 2, no. 1, Article ID 1018, 2015.

N. M. Delzenne, P. D. Cani, A. Everard, A. M. Neyrinck, and L. B. Bindels, “Gut microorganisms as promising targets for the management of type 2 diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2206–2217, 2015.

E. A. Murphy, K. T. Velazquez, and K. M. Herbert, “Influence of high-fat diet on gut microbiota: a driving force for chronic disease risk,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 515–520, 2015.

D. P. Singh, P. Khare, J. Zhu et al., “A novel cobiotic-based preventive approach against high-fat diet-induced adiposity, nonalcoholic fatty liver and gut derangement in mice,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 40, pp. 487–496, 2016.

J. P. Kesby, J. J. Kim, M. Scadeng et al., “Spatial cognition in adult and aged mice exposed to high-fat diet,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 10, Article ID e0140034, 2015.

D. Nuzzo, P. Picone, S. Baldassano et al., “Insulin resistance as common molecular denominator linking obesity to Alzheimer’s disease,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 723–735, 2015.

V. Kesherwani, V. Chavali, B. T. Hackfort, S. C. Tyagi, and P. K. Mishra, “Exercise ameliorates high fat diet induced cardiac dysfunction by increasing interleukin 10,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 6, article 124, 2015.

L. A. Brown, D. E. Lee, J. F. Patton et al., “Diet-induced obesity alters anabolic signalling in mice at the onset of skeletal muscle regeneration,” Acta Physiologica, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 46–57, 2015.

K. A. Baltgalvis, K. White, W. Li et al., “Exercise performance and peripheral vascular insufficiency improve with AMPK activation in high-fat diet-fed mice,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 306, no. 8, pp. H1128–H1145, 2014.

D. Akhmedov and R. Berdeaux, “The effects of obesity on skeletal muscle regeneration,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, article 371, 2013.

M.-H. Nguyen, M. Cheng, and T. J. Koh, “Impaired muscle regeneration in Ob/ob and Db/db mice,” TheScientificWorldJournal, vol. 11, pp. 1525–1535, 2011.

J. V. Neel, “Diabetes mellitus: a ‘thrifty’ genotype rendered detrimental by ‘progress’?” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 14, pp. 353–362, 1962.

J. R. Speakman and K. R. Westerterp, “A mathematical model of weight loss under total starvation: evidence against the thrifty-gene hypothesis,” Disease Models and Mechanisms, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 236–251, 2013.

Q. Ayub, L. Moutsianas, Y. Chen et al., “Revisiting the thrifty gene hypothesis via 65 loci associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 176–185, 2014.

X.-H. Koh, X. Liu, and Y.-Y. Teo, “Can evidence from genome-wide association studies and positive natural selection surveys be used to evaluate the thrifty gene hypothesis in East Asians?” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 10, Article ID A1833, 2014.

H. Taegtmeyer, C. Beauloye, R. Harmancey, and L. Hue, “Insulin resistance protects the heart from fuel overload in dysregulated metabolic states,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 305, no. 12, pp. H1693–H1697, 2013.

S. E. Nissen and K. Wolski, “Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 24, pp. 2457–2471, 2007.

C. Ding, J. Guo, and Z. Su, “The status of research into resistance to diet-induced obesity,” Hormone and Metabolic Research, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 404–410, 2015.

H.-Y. Lee, K.-H. Jeong, and C. S. Choi, “In-depth metabolic phenotyping of genetically engineered mouse models in obesity and diabetes,” Mammalian Genome, vol. 25, no. 9-10, pp. 508–521, 2014.

S. Guo, “Insulin signaling, resistance, and metabolic syndrome: insights from mouse models into disease mechanisms,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. T1–T23, 2014.

A. E. Bunner, P. C. Chandrasekera, and N. D. Barnard, “Knockout mouse models of insulin signaling: relevance past and future,” World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 146–159, 2014.

M. I. McCarthy, “Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 363, no. 24, pp. 2339–2350, 2010.

N. Jovicic, I. Jeftic, I. Jovanovic et al., “Differential immunometabolic phenotype in Th1 and Th2 dominant mouse strains in response to high-fat feeding,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 7, Article ID e0134089, 2015.

Y. Xue, J. Li, L. Yan, L. Lu, and F.-F. Liao, “Genetic variability to diet-induced hippocampal dysfunction in BXD recombinant inbred (RI) mouse strains,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 292, pp. 83–94, 2015.

R. S. Surwit, M. N. Feinglos, J. Rodin et al., “Differential effects of fat and sucrose on the development of obesity and diabetes in C57BL/6J and A J mice,” Metabolism, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 645–651, 1995.

S. Andrikopoulos, A. R. Blair, N. Deluca, B. C. Fam, and J. Proietto, “Evaluating the glucose tolerance test in mice,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 295, no. 6, pp. E1323–E1332, 2008.

Y. Ikeda, T. Suehiro, T. Nakamura, Y. Kumon, and K. Hashimoto, “Clinical significance of the insulin resistance index as assessed by homeostasis model assessment,” Endocrine Journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2001.

C. S. Choi, D. B. Savage, L. Abu-Elheiga et al., “Continuous fat oxidation in acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2 knockout mice increases total energy expenditure, reduces fat mass, and improves insulin sensitivity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 42, pp. 16480–16485, 2007.

Z. Zhang, S. Wang, S. Zhou et al., “Sulforaphane prevents the development of cardiomyopathy in type 2 diabetic mice probably by reversing oxidative stress-induced inhibition of LKB1/AMPK pathway,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 77, pp. 42–52, 2014.

M. V. Cannon, H. H. W. Silljé, J. W. A. Sijbesma et al., “LXRα improves myocardial glucose tolerance and reduces cardiac hypertrophy in a mouse model of obesity-induced type 2 diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 634–643, 2016.

K. J. Strissel, Z. Stancheva, H. Miyoshi et al., “Adipocyte death, adipose tissue remodeling, and obesity complications,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2910–2918, 2007.

K. Tajima, A. Nakamura, J. Shirakawa et al., “Metformin prevents liver tumorigenesis induced by high-fat diet in C57Bl/6 mice,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 305, no. 8, pp. E987–E998, 2013.

M. Ganz, T. N. Bukong, T. Csak et al., “Progression of non-alcoholic steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis parallels cumulative accumulation of danger signals that promote inflammation and liver tumors in a high fat-cholesterol-sugar diet model in mice,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, article 193, 2015.

C. X. Fang, F. Dong, D. P. Thomas, H. Ma, L. He, and J. Ren, “Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in high-fat diet-induced obesity: role of suppression of forkhead transcription factor and atrophy gene transcription,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 295, no. 3, pp. H1206–H1215, 2008.

R. E. Mosser, M. F. Maulis, V. S. Moullé et al., “High-fat diet-induced β-cell proliferation occurs prior to insulin resistance in C57Bl/6J male mice,” American Journal of Physiology—Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 308, no. 7, pp. E573–E582, 2015.

G. V. Asha, R. G. Reddy, M. Mahesh, A. Vajreswari, and S. M. Jeyakumar, “Male mice are susceptible to high fat diet-induced hyperglycaemia and display increased circulatory retinol binding protein 4 (RBP4) levels and its expression in visceral adipose depots,” Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2016.

Y. Macotela, J. Boucher, T. T. Tran, and C. R. Kahn, “Sex and depot differences in adipocyte insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 803–812, 2009.

E. Morselli, A. Criollo, C. Rodriguez-Navas, and D. J. Clegg, “Chronic high fat diet consumption impairs metabolic health of male mice,” Inflammation and Cell Signaling, vol. 1, no. 6, p. e561, 2014.

M. L. Grundleger, V. Y. Godbole, and S. W. Thenen, “Age-dependent development of insulin resistance of soleus muscle in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 239, no. 5, pp. E363–371, 1980.

M. Rossmeisl, J. S. Rim, R. A. Koza, and L. P. Kozak, “Variation in type 2 diabetes—related traits in mouse strains susceptible to diet-induced obesity,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1958–1966, 2003.

E. D. Berglund, C. Y. Li, G. Poffenberger et al., “Glucose metabolism in vivo in four commonly used inbred mouse strains,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1790–1799, 2008.

H. C. Freeman, A. Hugill, N. T. Dear, F. M. Ashcroft, and R. D. Cox, “Deletion of nicotinamide nucleotide transhydrogenase: a new quantitive trait locus accounting for glucose intolerance in C57BL/6J mice,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2153–2156, 2006.

J. L. Peirce, L. Lu, J. Gu, L. M. Silver, and R. W. Williams, “A new set of BXD recombinant inbred lines from advanced intercross populations in mice,” BMC Genetics, vol. 5, article 7, 2004.

W. C. Stanley, E. R. Dabkowski, R. F. Ribeiro, and K. A. O'Connell, “Dietary fat and heart failure: moving from lipotoxicity to lipoprotection,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 764–776, 2012.

N. Hariri, R. Gougeon, and L. Thibault, “A highly saturated fat-rich diet is more obesogenic than diets with lower saturated fat content,” Nutrition Research, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 632–643, 2010.

M. Takahashi, S. Ikemoto, and O. Ezaki, “Effect of the fat/carbohydrate ratio in the diet on obesity and oral glucose tolerance in C57BL/6J mice,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 583–593, 1999.

T. U. Maioli, J. L. Gonçalves, M. C. G. Miranda et al., “High sugar and butter (HSB) diet induces obesity and metabolic syndrome with decrease in regulatory T cells in adipose tissue of mice,” Inflammation Research, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169–178, 2016.

J. Luo, J. Quan, J. Tsai et al., “Nongenetic mouse models of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 663–668, 1998.

J. Cai, S. Lu, Z. Yao et al., “Glibenclamide attenuates myocardial injury by lipopolysaccharides in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 13, no. 1, article 106, 2014.

K. A. Krawczewski Carhuatanta, G. Demuro, M. H. Tschöp, P. T. Pfluger, S. C. Benoit, and S. Obici, “Voluntary exercise improves high-fat diet-induced leptin resistance independent of adiposity,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 7, pp. 2655–2664, 2011.

Q. Wang, X. D. Perrard, J. L. Perrard et al., “Differential effect of weight loss with low-fat diet or high-fat diet restriction on inflammation in the liver and adipose tissue of mice with diet-induced obesity,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 2011.

F. Q. Nuttall and M. C. Gannon, “Sucrose and disease,” Diabetes Care, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 305–310, 1981.

D. Mishmar, E. Ruiz-Pesini, P. Golik et al., “Natural selection shaped regional mtDNA variation in humans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 171–176, 2003.

N. Apaijai, H. Pintana, S. C. Chattipakorn, and N. Chattipakorn, “Effects of vildagliptin versus sitagliptin, on cardiac function, heart rate variability and mitochondrial function in obese insulin-resistant rats,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 1048–1057, 2013.

N. S. Kalupahana, N. Moustaid-Moussa, and K. J. Claycombe, “Immunity as a link between obesity and insulin resistance,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2012.

G. R. Romeo, J. Lee, and S. E. Shoelson, “Metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and roles of inflammation—mechanisms and therapeutic targets,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1771–1776, 2012.

B. D. Henriksbo, T. C. Lau, J. F. Cavallari et al., “Fluvastatin causes NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated adipose insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 3742–3747, 2014.

J. D. Schilling and D. L. Mann, “Diabetic cardiomyopathy: bench to bedside,” Heart Failure Clinics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 619–631, 2012.

R. Stienstra, S. Mandard, D. Patsouris, C. Maass, S. Kersten, and M. Müller, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α protects against obesity-induced hepatic inflammation,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 6, pp. 2753–2763, 2007.

R. H. Ritchie and L. M. D. Delbridge, “Cardiac hypertrophy, substrate utilization and metabolic remodelling: cause or effect?” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 159–166, 2006.

E. Di Marco, J. C. Jha, A. Sharma, J. L. Wilkinson-Berka, K. A. Jandeleit-Dahm, and J. B. De Haan, “Are reactive oxygen species still the basis for diabetic complications?” Clinical Science, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 199–216, 2016.

T. Yu, S.-S. Sheu, J. L. Robotham, and Y. Yoon, “Mitochondrial fission mediates high glucose-induced cell death through elevated production of reactive oxygen species,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 341–351, 2008.

T. Watanabe, M. Saotome, M. Nobuhara et al., “Roles of mitochondrial fragmentation and reactive oxygen species in mitochondrial dysfunction and myocardial insulin resistance,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 323, no. 2, pp. 314–325, 2014.

H.-C. Hsu, C.-Y. Chen, B.-C. Lee, and M.-F. Chen, “High-fat diet induces cardiomyocyte apoptosis via the inhibition of autophagy,” European Journal of Nutrition, 2015.

K. Liu, E. Zhao, G. Ilyas et al., “Impaired macrophage autophagy increases the immune response in obese mice by promoting proinflammatory macrophage polarization,” Autophagy, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 271–284, 2015.

L. V. Yuzefovych, S. I. Musiyenko, G. L. Wilson, and L. I. Rachek, “Mitochondrial DNA damage and dysfunction, and oxidative stress are associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress, protein degradation and apoptosis in high fat diet-induced insulin resistance mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e54059, 2013.

S. Sciarretta, M. Volpe, and J. Sadoshima, “Is reactivation of autophagy a possible therapeutic solution for obesity and metabolic syndrome?” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1252–1254, 2012.

Y. Liu, R. Palanivel, E. Rai et al., “Adiponectin stimulates autophagy and reduces oxidative stress to enhance insulin sensitivity during high-fat diet feeding in mice,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 36–48, 2015.

D. Montaigne, X. Marechal, A. Coisne et al., “Myocardial contractile dysfunction is associated with impaired mitochondrial function and dynamics in type 2 diabetic but not in obese patients,” Circulation, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 554–564, 2014.

F. Westermeier, M. Navarro-Marquez, C. López-Crisosto et al., “Defective insulin signaling and mitochondrial dynamics in diabetic cardiomyopathy,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1853, no. 5, pp. 1113–1118, 2015.

V. Parra, H. E. Verdejo, M. Iglewski et al., “Insulin stimulates mitochondrial fusion and function in cardiomyocytes via the Akt-mTOR-NFκB-Opa-1 signaling pathway,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 75–88, 2014.

S. Gundewar, J. W. Calvert, S. Jha et al., “Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by metformin improves left ventricular function and survival in heart failure,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 403–411, 2009.

E. A. Bradley, L. Zhang, A. J. Genders, S. M. Richards, S. Rattigan, and M. A. Keske, “Enhancement of insulin-mediated rat muscle glucose uptake and microvascular perfusion by 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-d-ribofuranoside,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 14, no. 1, article 91, 2015.

B.-C. Lee and J. Lee, “Cellular and molecular players in adipose tissue inflammation in the development of obesity-induced insulin resistance,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1842, no. 3, pp. 446–462, 2014.

K. I. Stanford, R. J. W. Middelbeek, K. L. Townsend et al., “Brown adipose tissue regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 215–223, 2013.

S. Virtue and A. Vidal-Puig, “Assessment of brown adipose tissue function,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 4, article 128, 2013.

K. Majzner, K. Kochan, N. Kachamakova-Trojanowska, E. Maslak, S. Chlopicki, and M. Baranska, “Raman imaging providing insights into chemical composition of lipid droplets of different size and origin: in hepatocytes and endothelium,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 86, no. 13, pp. 6666–6674, 2014.

G. Kanuri and I. Bergheim, “In vitro and in vivo models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD),” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 11963–11980, 2013.

A. Consoli, N. Nurjhan, F. Capani, and J. Gerich, “Predominant role of gluconeogenesis in increased hepatic glucose production in NIDDM,” Diabetes, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 550–557, 1989.

M. S. Brown and J. L. Goldstein, “Selective versus total insulin resistance: a pathogenic paradox,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 95–96, 2008.

P. K. Battiprolu, T. G. Gillette, Z. V. Wang, S. Lavandero, and J. A. Hill, “Diabetic cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and therapeutic targets,” Drug Discovery Today: Disease Mechanisms, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. e135–e143, 2010.

P. K. Battiprolu, B. Hojayev, N. Jiang et al., “Metabolic stress-induced activation of FoxO1 triggers diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 1109–1118, 2012.

R. H. Unger, “Lipotoxic diseases,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 53, pp. 319–336, 2002.

T. F. Galvao, B. H. Brown, P. A. Hecker et al., “High intake of saturated fat, but not polyunsaturated fat, improves survival in heart failure despite persistent mitochondrial defects,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 24–32, 2012.

G. C. Fonarow, P. Srikanthan, M. R. Costanzo, G. B. Cintron, and M. Lopatin, “An obesity paradox in acute heart failure: analysis of body mass index and inhospital mortality for 108 927 patients in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry,” American Heart Journal, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 74–81, 2007.

M. Poncelas, J. Inserte, Ú. Vilardosa et al., “Obesity induced by high fat diet attenuates postinfarct myocardial remodeling and dysfunction in adult B6D2F1 mice,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 84, pp. 154–161, 2015.

Y. Zhou, S. Lin, L. Zhang, and Y. Li, “Resveratrol prevents renal lipotoxicity in high-fat diet-treated mouse model through regulating PPAR-α pathway,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 411, no. 1-2, pp. 143–150, 2016.