Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4543065, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4543065

Research Article

Fibrin Clot Strength in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Measured by Thrombelastography

Benjamin T. Maatman, Glen Schmeisser, and Rolf P. Kreutz

Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Rolf P. Kreutz; rkreutz@iu.edu

Received 13 September 2017; Accepted 30 November 2017; Published 4 February 2018

Academic Editor: Giovanni de Gaetano

Copyright © 2018 Benjamin T. Maatman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) exhibit increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction. Maximal clot strength measured by thrombelastography (TEG) is a risk factor for recurrent ischemic events. We hypothesized that diabetic subjects exhibit increased fibrin clot strength in platelet-poor plasma and that glycemic control correlates with maximal fibrin clot strength. Methods. We collected plasma samples from subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac catheterization (). We measured kaolin-activated TEG in platelet-poor citrate plasma. Time to fibrin formation (R), clot formation time (K), and maximal fibrin clot strength (MA) were recorded. Results. Plasma fibrin MA was increased among subjects with DM () as compared to non-DM () (37.0 ± 8 versus 34.1 ± 8 mm; ). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (; ) and fibrinogen (; ) correlated with fibrin MA. In multivariable regression analysis, DM remained significantly associated with plasma MA after adjustment for fibrinogen level (). Conclusions. Subjects with diabetes mellitus exhibit increased maximal fibrin clot strength measured by TEG in platelet-poor plasma.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) leads to increased risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and is considered a CAD risk equivalent [1–5]. Hyperglycemia during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been associated with worse outcomes even in the absence of overt diabetes [6]. DM is associated with elevated fibrinogen, increased thromboxane A2, reduced platelet nitric oxide synthesis, as well as increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) release from platelets leading to inhibition of thrombolysis [7–11].

Thrombelastography (TEG) is an established clinical laboratory method for analysis of coagulation and fibrinolysis and allows for quantitative measurement of the dynamic processes of clot formation and clot strength [12, 13]. We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of measurement of plasma fibrin clot strength by TEG in platelet-poor plasma and correlation with whole blood fibrin TEG measurements [14]. Elevated whole blood as well as platelet-poor plasma maximal clot strength by TEG (TEG-MA) has been associated with an increased risk of ischemic events after coronary stenting [15–17]. Subjects with high plasma clot strength showed a 3.8-fold increased risk for cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention [17].

We hypothesized that subjects with DM exhibit increased fibrin clot strength (TEG-MA) in platelet-poor plasma as compared with controls and that extent of glycemic control correlates with maximal fibrin clot strength.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

The study protocol was approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Board for Research. All enrolled individuals gave written informed consent. Subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease who were referred for cardiac catheterization were included in this study. Blood samples were obtained prior to cardiac catheterization or hospital discharge. Plasma samples were stored as part of a biobank registry in patients with cardiovascular disease (Genetics and Cardiac Catheterization (GENCATH) study).

2.2. Blood Samples

Whole blood was collected by peripheral venipuncture in 3.2% citrate after discarding of initial blood draw. We obtained platelet-poor plasma (PPP) by centrifugation at 2000 ×g for 15 min. Plasma was stored at −80°C and thawed immediately before analysis.

2.3. Subjects with Diabetes Mellitus

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was recorded if there was a value present during chart review within three months of the blood sample collection. Within the insulin-dependent subpopulation of the diabetic group, the total daily administered insulin dose was recorded and this was defined as the sum of short-acting plus long-acting insulin as obtained from the patient’s medication list.

2.4. Thrombelastography (TEG)

Kaolin-activated TEG (Haemonetics, USA) was performed in all subjects () using platelet-poor citrate plasma samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Citrate plasma was mixed with kaolin and then loaded in a heparinase-coated cup containing 20 ml of CaCl2 [18]. Thrombelastography was stopped after time to fibrin formation (R), clot formation time (K), and maximal clot strength (MA) were recorded. In a subset of subjects (), kaolin-activated TEG was also performed in the same fashion using whole blood citrate samples.

2.5. Enzyme-Linked Immuno Assays (ELISA)

Fibrinogen (Fibrinogen (human) ELISA kit; Alpco Diagnostics, Salem, New Hampshire, USA), Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1 (human) ELISA kit; Raybiotech, Norcross, Georgia, USA) and factor XIIIa (Zymutest Factor XIII-A, Aniara, West Chester, Ohio, USA) were measured by ELISA in citrate platelet-poor plasma according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

We conducted statistical analysis with SPSS 24 (IBM, USA). We defined statistical significance as a p value less than 0.05, with all tests being conducted two sided. All the values are mean ± SD. We used unpaired, two-sided Student’s t-test to compare normally distributed continuous data between two groups after assessing normal distribution of continuous data by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We used the test to compare categorical variables. To calculate correlation between thrombelastography parameters (MA, R, and K) and other continuous variables, Spearman’s rho was used. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed with TEG-MA as the dependent variable and diabetes mellitus as the covariate with forward stepwise adjustment for remaining clinical variables and fibrinogen level.

3. Results

We enrolled 152 diabetic and 202 nondiabetic subjects (total ). Baseline characteristics of the study subjects are displayed in Table 1. Diabetic subjects had higher body mass index (BMI) and higher prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia but lower prevalence of smoking (Table 1). HbA1C was higher in the diabetic group as compared to nondiabetic subjects (7.92 ± 0.5% versus 5.82 ± 1.8%; ) (Table 1). Among the insulin-dependent diabetic subjects, the average total daily dose of insulin was 93 units (Table 1).

Table 1: Baseline variables.

Patient characteristics
Total study population ()
No diabetes mellitus ()
Diabetes mellitus ()
value

Age (years)
57.1 ± 9.9
55.8 ± 9.8
58.8 ± 9.7
0.005

BMI (kg/m²)
32 ± 7.3
31.2 ± 7.6
33 ± 6.9
0.018

Male (%)
209/354 (59.3%)
124/202 (61.4%)
85/152 (55.9%)
0.3

African Americans (%)
95/354 (26.8%)
54/202 (26.7%)
41/109 (27%)
0.71

Hypertension (%)
320/354 (90.4%)
172/202 (85.1%)
148/152 (97.4%)
<0.001

Hyperlipidemia (%)
303/354 (85.6%)
160/202 (79.2%)
143/152 (94.1%)
<0.001

Coronary artery disease (%)
310/354 (87.6%)
171/202 (84.6%)
139/152 (91.4%)
0.06

History of myocardial infarction (%)
203/354 (57.3%)
118/202 (58.4%)
85/152 (55.9%)
0.64

History of percutaneous coronary intervention (%)
257/354 (72.6%)
147/202 (72.7%)
110/152 (72.4%)
0.93

History of coronary artery bypass grafting (%)
58/354 (16.4%)
27/202 (13.4%)
31/152 (20.4%)
0.08

Congestive heart failure (%)
63/354 (17.8%)
32/202 (15.8%)
31/152 (20.4%)
0.27

Smoking (%)
162/354 (45.8%)
106/202 (52.5%)
56/152 (36.8%)
0.003

Hemoglobin A1c (%)
n/a
5.82 ± 0.5
7.92 ± 1.8
<0.001

Insulin dependent (%)
n/a
n/a
50/152 (30%)
n/a

Daily insulin dose (units)
n/a
n/a
93 ± 74
n/a

Fibrinogen (mg/ml)
3.7 ± 3.1
3.2 ± 2
4.3 ± 4
0.027

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (ng/ml)
120.8 ± 96
112 ± 89
134.8 ± 106
0.34

Factor XIIIa (%)
91.1 ± 30
92.1 ± 31
89.7 ± 29
0.48

Maximal fibrin clot strength in platelet-poor plasma (plasma TEG-MA) was higher among subjects with diabetes as compared to nondiabetics (37.0 ± 8 versus 34.1 ± 8 mm; ) (Table 2, Figure 1). There was no significant difference in time to initial fibrin formation (plasma TEG-R) in the diabetic population (6.6 ± 3 versus 6.9 ± 3.8 min; ) or clot formation time (plasma TEG-K) (1.38 ± 1.3 versus 1.47 ± 1.2 min; ) (Figure 1, Table 2). Among the subgroup of individuals () who had both plasma and whole blood TEG assays completed, there was no significant difference in whole blood TEG measurements between the DM and non-DM groups (Table 2). Whole blood and platelet-poor plasma TEG measurements correlated for all measures but most strongly for TEG-MA (; ) (Figure 2).

Table 2: Thrombelastography measures.

No diabetes mellitus ()
Diabetes mellitus ()
value

Plasma TEG-R (min)
6.9 ± 3.8
6.6 ± 3.0
0.36

Plasma TEG-K (min)
1.47 ± 1.2
1.38 ± 1.3
0.49

Plasma TEG-MA (mm)
34.1 ± 7.5
37.0 ± 8.1
<0.001

Whole blood TEG-R (min)
5.1 ± 2.2
5.6 ± 1.6
0.26

Whole blood TEG-K (min)
1.5 ± 0.5
1.58 ± 0.5
0.45

Whole blood TEG-MA (mm)
66 ± 5.8
66.6 ± 5.6
0.61

TEG-R = time to fibrin formation; TEG-K = clot formation time; TEG-MA = maximal clot strength. Plasma TEG: . Whole blood TEG: .

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: Thrombelastography measures between subjects with diabetes mellitus and without diabetes mellitus in platelet-poor plasma. (a) TEG-R: time to fibrin formation. (b) TEG-K: clot formation time. (c) TEG-MA: maximal fibrin clot strength. Mean ± 95% confidence interval.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2: Correlation between whole blood and platelet-poor plasma TEG measurements in a subgroup of the overall study population () divided between subjects with and without diabetes mellitus. (a) TEG-R: time to fibrin formation. (b) TEG-K: clot formation time. (c) TEG-MA: maximal clot strength.

There was a nonsignificant trend towards shorter clot formation time (plasma TEG-K: 1.12 ± 0.6 versus 1.5 ± 1.4 min; ) in insulin-dependent diabetics compared to non-insulin-dependent diabetics. There was no significant difference in plasma TEG-MA (38.1 ± 9 versus 36.5 ± 8 mm; ) and time to fibrin formation between insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetics (plasma TEG-R: 6.3 ± 2.3 versus 6.8 ± 3.3 min; ) (Table 3). The differences in plasma TEG-MA remained unchanged between DM and non-DM subjects after exclusion of subjects with HbA1C in the prediabetic range (5.7–6.4% as defined by American Diabetes Association [19]) (plasma TEG-MA: 37.3 ± 8 versus 34.3 ± 7 mm; ).

Table 3: Thrombelastography: insulin-dependent versus non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Insulin-dependent DM ()
Non-insulin-dependent DM ()
value

Plasma TEG-R (min)
6.3 ± 2.3
6.8 ± 3.3
0.37

Plasma TEG-K (min)
1.12 ± 0.6
1.5 ± 1.4
0.08

Plasma TEG-MA (mm)
38.1 ± 9
36.5 ± 8
0.27

TEG-R = time to fibrin formation; TEG-K = clot formation time; TEG-MA = maximal fibrin clot strength.

HbA1c correlated with plasma TEG-MA (, ), with higher TEG-MA in subjects with elevated HbA1C and, hence, poorer control of their DM (Figure 3). There was no significant correlation between daily insulin dose and TEG-MA among patients with insulin-dependent DM (; ) (Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: Scatterplot demonstrating maximal plasma fibrin clot strength (TEG-MA), hemoglobin A1c (a), insulin total daily dose (units) (b), and fibrinogen (c).

Fibrinogen was elevated in subjects with diabetes mellitus (4.3 ± 4 versus 3.2 ± 2 mg/ml, ) (Table 1). Fibrinogen correlated with plasma fibrin TEG-MA (; ; Figure 3) but not whole blood TEG-MA (; ). PAI-1 and factor XIIIa were not significantly different between subjects with and without DM (Table 1). PAI-1 did not correlate with plasma TEG-MA (; ).

In multivariable linear regression analysis, DM () and fibrinogen () remained significantly associated with plasma TEG-MA after forward stepwise adjustment for clinical variables (Table 4).

Table 4: Multivariable linear regression analysis.

Variable
B
95% confidence interval for B
value

Diabetes mellitus
3.5 ± 1.2
1.2–5.8
0.003

Fibrinogen
0.44 ± 0.2
0.07–0.8
0.019

Dependent variable: plasma TEG-MA.

4. Discussion

The results of our study demonstrate that subjects with diabetes mellitus have increased fibrin clot strength (MA) as measured by TEG in platelet-poor plasma compared to nondiabetics. The association of diabetes mellitus with plasma fibrin clot strength persisted after adjustment for fibrinogen, which influences strength of clot formation measured by TEG. We have recently demonstrated that elevated fibrin clot strength measured by TEG in platelet-poor plasma is associated with increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death after PCI, similar to the findings observed in studies using whole blood TEG assays [17].

In whole blood, maximal clot strength (MA) measured by TEG is the sum of the additive forces generated by aggregating and contracting platelets incorporated into the growing, initially soluble fibrin network, which is cross-linked and stabilized by FXIIIa [13, 20]. In a large cohort study of subjects with coronary artery disease by Lev et al., DM was also independently associated with whole blood (platelet-fibrin) clot strength measured by TEG [21].

In the subgroup of patients in our study who had both whole blood and plasma TEG studies performed, there was a moderate correlation between both measurements for TEG-MA and to a lesser degree for TEG-R and TEG-K. While plasma MA was significantly higher in diabetic subjects, we did not find a significant difference in whole blood MA in our study. This may be due to the smaller number of subjects with whole blood TEG assays completed, as well as possible differences in platelet contribution to clot strength in whole blood TEG between subjects with and without diabetes.

Fibrinogen is an important determinant of fibrin structure and of cross-linked fibrin network strength, and both fibrinogen and factor XIIIa activity influence maximal fibrin clot strength measured by TEG [22]. Fibrinogen has been previously shown to be elevated in subjects with diabetes mellitus [11, 23]. In our study, fibrinogen levels were also higher in subjects with DM, and fibrinogen remained a significant covariate in multivariable linear regression analysis. In contrast, PAI-1 and factor XIIIa were not significantly different between diabetics and nondiabetics.

We did not find any significant correlation between daily insulin dose and plasma TEG-MA among the insulin-dependent subpopulation, while elevated plasma MA was associated with worse glycemic control. Possible mechanisms linking hyperglycemia to a prothrombotic state include effects on gene transcription of coagulation factors, loss of the endothelial layer through glycosylation with a deficiency of nitric oxide, direct glycosylation of coagulation factors altering their activity [24, 25], as well as increased platelet activation [4, 26–29]. Combined hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia has been demonstrated to acutely increase circulating tissue factor procoagulant activity (TF-PCA) ninefold in previously healthy subjects [30].

Current recommendations in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with DM do not yet incorporate use of therapies targeted towards reduction of thrombin formation and fibrin stabilization. However, recent results from the COMPASS study demonstrate a significant reduction in cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction or stroke in patients with stable cardiovascular disease who were treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily in addition to aspirin as compared to patients who were treated with aspirin alone (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.66–0.86) [31]. The reduction in risk with rivaroxaban was more pronounced in the diabetic subgroup (HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61–0.9) [31]. Future studies will need to assess whether TEG parameters in diabetic patients could be used to risk stratify and develop treatment strategies in diabetic patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease.

Limitations to our study include that HbA1C values were collected retrospectively and were not standardized to a collection at the time of TEG blood sample collection; as values were only recorded if collected within a three-month window, glycemic control at time of analysis was assumed to be equivalent. We were not able to assess thrombolysis characteristics of patients with DM, as spontaneous thrombolysis generally does not occur with TEG after activation with kaolin and CaCl2.

In conclusion, our data show that diabetes mellitus is associated with increased fibrin clot strength (TEG-MA) as measured in platelet-poor plasma, a marker of thrombotic risk in patients with coronary artery disease. Worse glycemic control as defined by an elevated HbA1C is moderately correlated with higher plasma TEG-MA, whereas there was no statistically significant correlation with use or dosage of insulin. Further studies are warranted to examine the mechanisms associated with increased plasma TEG-MA and to examine the utility of plasma TEG-MA in personalized approaches to guide antithrombotic therapies in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Disclosure

The contents of this manuscript have in part been presented as a poster at the Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (ATVB) scientific meeting in 2015, and the corresponding abstract has been published in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, May 2015, Volume 35, Issue Suppl 1: A597.

Conflicts of Interest

Rolf P. Kreutz has served as scientific consultant for Roche Diagnostics, Coramed, and Haemonetics Corporation.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported in part by the Indiana University School of Medicine-IU Health Strategic Research Initiative, the IU Health Values Grant, and the CTSI Specimen Storage Facility (SSF), subsidized by the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute which is supported, in part, by a NCRR Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (U54-RR025761; Anantha Shekhar, PI) and Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute SSF facility construction funded in part through a NCRR construction grant (C06-RR020128-01; R.S. Fife, PI, K. Cornetta, Co-I). Dr. Benjamin T. Maatman was supported by a travel grant from the Charles Fisch Cardiovascular Research Award endowed by Dr. Suzanne B. Knoebel of the Krannert Institute of Cardiology.

References

W. B. Kannel and D. L. McGee, “Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–126, 1979.

K. Pyörälä, M. Laakso, and M. Uusitupa, “Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 463–524, 1987.

J. Stamler, O. Vaccaro, J. D. Neaton, D. Wentworth, and The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group, “Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the multiple risk factor intervention trial,” Diabetes Care, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 434–444, 1993.

S. M. Haffner, S. Lehto, T. Rönnemaa, K. Pyörälä, and M. Laakso, “Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 4, pp. 229–243, 2015.

E. Barrett-Connor, “Diabetes and heart disease,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2947–2958, 2003.

P. Petursson, J. Herlitz, K. Caidahl et al., “Admission glycaemia and outcome after acute coronary syndrome,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 315–320, 2007.

R. A. Rabini, R. Staffolani, P. Fumelli, B. Mutus, G. Curatola, and L. Mazzanti, “Decreased nitric oxide synthase activity in platelets from IDDM and NIDDM patients,” Diabetologia, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 101–104, 1998.

G. Davì, I. Catalano, M. Averna et al., “Thromboxane biosynthesis and platelet function in type II diabetes mellitus,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 322, no. 25, pp. 1769–1774, 1990.

Y. Zhu, P. Carmeliet, and W. P. Fay, “Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is a major determinant of arterial thrombolysis resistance,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 23, pp. 3050–3055, 1999.

R. P. Kreutz, P. Nystrom, Y. Kreutz et al., “Inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) in diabetic patients during therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin,” Platelets, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2013.

W. B. Kannel, R. B. D'Agostino, P. W. F. Wilson, A. J. Belanger, and D. R. Gagnon, “Diabetes, fibrinogen, and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Framingham experience,” American Heart Journal, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 672–676, 1990.

M. T. Ganter and C. K. Hofer, “Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 1366–1375, 2008.

A. Bitar and R. P. Kreutz, “Role of thrombelastography (TEG) in risk assessment and guidance of antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease,” Drug Development Research, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 533–540, 2013.

D. Lu, J. Owens, and R. P. Kreutz, “Plasma and whole blood clot strength measured by thrombelastography in patients treated with clopidogrel during acute coronary syndromes,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. e94–e98, 2013.

R. P. Kreutz, J. Owens, J. A. Breall et al., “C-reactive protein and fibrin clot strength measured by thrombelastography after coronary stenting,” Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 321–326, 2013.

P. A. Gurbel, K. P. Bliden, K. Guyer et al., “Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1820–1826, 2005.

R. P. Kreutz, G. Schmeisser, B. Maatman et al., “Fibrin clot strength measured by thrombelastography and outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 426–428, 2017.

R. P. Kreutz, A. Bitar, J. Owens et al., “Factor XIII Val₃₄Leu polymorphism and recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease,” Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 380–387, 2014.

American Diabetes Association, “Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 4, article e57, 2010.

O. N. Okafor and D. A. Gorog, “Endogenous fibrinolysis: an important mediator of thrombus formation and cardiovascular risk,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 65, no. 16, pp. 1683–1699, 2015.

E. I. Lev, K. P. Bliden, Y. H. Jeong et al., “Influence of race and sex on thrombogenicity in a large cohort of coronary artery disease patients,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 3, no. 5, article e001167, 2014.

V. G. Nielsen, W. Q. Gurley Jr, and T. M. Burch, “The impact of factor XIII on coagulation kinetics and clot strength determined by thrombelastography,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 120–123, 2004.

G. Di Giovine, M. Verdoia, L. Barbieri et al., “Impact of diabetes on fibrinogen levels and its relationship with platelet reactivity and coronary artery disease: a single-centre study,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 541–550, 2015.

B. A. Lemkes, J. Hermanides, J. H. Devries, F. Holleman, J. C. Meijers, and J. B. Hoekstra, “Hyperglycemia: a prothrombotic factor?” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1663–1669, 2010.

P. J. Grant, “Diabetes mellitus as a prothrombotic condition,” Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 157–172, 2007.

M. J. Price, D. J. Angiolillo, P. S. Teirstein et al., “Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 10, pp. 1132–1137, 2011.

M. E. Carr, “Diabetes mellitus: a hypercoagulable state,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2001.

J. H. Jung, U. S. Tantry, P. A. Gurbel, and Y. H. Jeong, “Current antiplatelet treatment strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes & Metabolism Journal, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 95–113, 2015.

E. Cersosimo and R. A. DeFronzo, “Insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction: the road map to cardiovascular diseases,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 423–436, 2006.

V. R. Vaidyula, A. K. Rao, M. Mozzoli, C. Homko, P. Cheung, and G. Boden, “Effects of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia on circulating tissue factor procoagulant activity and platelet CD40 ligand,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 55, p. 1, 2006.

J. W. Eikelboom, S. J. Connolly, J. Bosch et al., “Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 377, no. 14, pp. 1319–1330, 2017.