Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2019 (2019), Article ID 8137417, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8137417

Research Article

Aqueous Humor Cytokine Levels in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients with Cotton-Wool Spots

Young-Gun Park,¹ Donghyun Jee,² and Jin-woo Kwon²

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
²Department of Ophthalmology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Jin-woo Kwon; krnjs99@catholic.ac.kr

Received 2 July 2019; Revised 13 November 2019; Accepted 5 December 2019; Published 21 December 2019

Academic Editor: Janet H. Southerland

Copyright © 2019 Young-Gun Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Purpose. To determine the characteristics of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients with cotton-wool spots (CWS). Methods. We classified 80 treatment-naïve DME patients according to whether or not they had CWS involving macula and then compared the concentrations of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in the aqueous humor between the groups, as well as optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, baseline characteristics, and intravitreal bevacizumab responsiveness. Results. Aqueous levels of ICAM-1 and VEGF in the group with CWS were significantly higher than those in the non-CWS (control) group ( and , respectively). In multiple logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with CWS, the aqueous ICAM-1 (≥0.36 ng/mL) was significantly associated with CWS (, ). Based on OCT, ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption distribution was significantly different between the two groups (). Regarding responsiveness to treatment, although there was no significant difference in central subfield thickness between the two groups after treatments, the best-corrected visual acuity was worse in the group with CWS. Conclusions. The presence of CWS was accompanied by higher levels of aqueous ICAM-1. Based on OCT, EZ disruption was greater in DME patients with CWS, and their short-term visual prognosis was poorer.

1. Introduction

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the major cause of vision impairment in diabetic patients [1, 2]. Alteration of the blood-retina barrier is a hallmark of DME, which is characterized by loss of pericytes and breakdown of the endothelial junction [3]. Multiple cells, cytokines, and growth factors are involved in the pathogenesis of DME, which affects the neurovascular system [4].

Cotton-wool spots (CWS), also known as soft exudate, are accumulations of axoplasmic debris related to microinfarcts induced by arteriolar occlusion [5]. Although CWS are the common findings in the nonproliferative stage of diabetic retinopathy (DR), they could be associated with disease progression [6]. Many studies have shown that the aqueous humor of DME patients contains elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, and matrix metalloproteinases, which are associated with the status of the retina [7–9]. The individual roles played by these factors in the pathogenesis of DME remain unclear, although many studies have sought to determine their mechanisms of action in detail.

We thus determined the levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, placental growth factor (PlGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in the aqueous humor of 21 DME patients with CWS and compared them with those of 59 DME patients without CWS.

2. Methods

The study protocol adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review/Ethics Board of the Catholic University of Korea. All the participants gave written informed consent for the use of their clinical records.

We enrolled patients with treatment-naïve center-involving DME (ciDME) eyes and excluded the eyes with macular edema due to other causes or any history of uveitis or intraocular surgery. We classified them according to whether or not they had CWS involving macula.

We measured glycated hemoglobin levels, and all the patients received ophthalmic examinations, which included the measurement of the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and a fundus examination. The central subfield thickness (CST) was measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT; Cirrus High-Definition OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). The hyperreflective foci (HF) were manually measured within 1,500 μm, and ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption was manually checked within 1,000 μm using a horizontal scan centered on the fovea (Figure 1) [10].

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: A representative patient who had diabetic macular edema with cotton-wool spots (CWS). (a) The baseline fundus photo image shows multiple CWS around fovea. (b) The baseline spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) image shows focal ellipsoid zone disruption (red arrow).

2.1. Assay of Cytokines and Growth Factors

We measured the concentrations of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, PlGF, VEGF, and ICAM-1 in 75 μL of the aqueous humor. The antibodies were immobilized on beads, and the samples with 75 μL Calibrator Diluent RD6-52 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were added to the preparations. The samples were then incubated for 2 h after adding the beads and incubated for 1 h after adding the detection antibodies; then, they were incubated for 30 min after adding the streptavidin-phycoerythrin reagent. The samples were read using the Luminex xMAP system (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA) [7].

2.2. Statistical Evaluation

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The -test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square test were used to compare the values or the ratios of the patient subgroups. The signed-rank test was used to compare changes in CST and BCVA. Logistic regression was employed to identify factors associated with CWS.

3. Results

We enrolled 80 treatment-naïve (ciDME) eyes of 80 patients. The mean age was years, and there were 39 males and 41 females. In the DR staging, 45 patients had proliferative DR (56.25%) and 35 had nonproliferative DR (43.75%). The mean BCVA (logMAR) was , and the mean CST was  μm at baseline. When classifying the DME morphology, 33 patients had cystoid macular edema and 47 had diffuse retinal thickening.

There were 21 eyes with CWS involving macula among the DME patients and 59 eyes without CWS. There was no significant difference in age, sex, DR stage distribution, glycated hemoglobin level, BCVA, or CST between the two groups. Although there was no significant difference in CST after three consecutive intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections between the two groups (), the BCVA (logMAR) of the CWS group was significantly worse than that of the group without CWS (). The systemic and ocular characteristics of the patients in each group are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Demographics and clinical characteristics of DME patients classified with retinal morphology.

DME without CWS ()
DME with CWS ()

Systemic factors
Sex (male : female)
32 : 27
9 : 12
0.521

Age (years)
57.0 [52.5; 63.5]
61.0 [55.0; 64.0]
0.599

HbA1C (%)

0.054

Hypertension
23 (38.98%)
13 (61.91%)
0.119

OCT findings
Number of HF
5.0 [3.0; 10.0]
5.0 [4.0; 10.0]
0.570

DME type (DRT : CME)
35 : 24
12 : 9
1.000

EZ disruption grade
(-)
39 (66.10%)
7 (33.33%)
0.038

(+)
20 (33.90%)
14 (66.67%)

Aqueous humor cytokines and growth factors
ICAM-1 (ng/mL)
0.00 [0.00; 0.00]
0.36 [0.00; 2.87]
<0.001

IL-1β (pg/mL)
0.00 [0.00; 0.43]
0.17 [0.00; 0.17]
0.591

IL-6 (pg/mL)
7.96 [4.16; 18.64]
16.32 [4.98; 31.88]
0.281

IL-8 (pg/mL)
13.65 [9.77; 23.84]
11.37 [8.16; 24.43]
0.364

IL-10 (pg/mL)
0.65 [0.19; 1.32]
0.53 [0.26; 0.93]
0.700

IL-17 (pg/mL)
1.36 [0.54; 1.96]
0.54 [0.00; 2.55]
0.356

PlGF (pg/mL)
2.85 [1.92; 3.97]
2.85 [2.32; 7.70]
0.477

VEGF (pg/mL)
48.18 [22.62; 80.33]
92.73 [59.70; 184.46]
0.006

Ocular factors
Baseline BCVA (logMAR)
0.50 [0.30; 1.00]
0.70 [0.50; 1.00]
0.053

BCVA after IVBs (logMAR)
0.40 [0.20; 0.70]
0.70 [0.40; 1.00]
0.006

Baseline CST (μm)
353.0 [326.5; 419.5]
391.0 [347.0; 574.0]
0.054

CST after IVBs (μm)
314.0 [286.5; 358.5]
313.0 [272.0; 398.0]
0.861

DMR (NPDR : PDR)
26 : 33
9 : 12
1.000

Values are expressed as or median and interquartile range, as appropriate. DME: diabetic macular edema; CWS: cotton-wool spot; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HF: hyperreflective foci; CME: cystoid macular edema; DRT: diffuse retinal thickening; EZ: ellipsoid zone; ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule; IL: interleukin; PlGF: placental growth factor; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; BCVA: best-corrected visual acuity; IVB: intravitreal bevacizumab; CST: central subfield thickness; DMR: DM retinopathy; NPDR: nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR: proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

The CST reduction after three consecutive monthly IVBs of the group with CWS was  μm, and that of the group without CWS was  μm. The average CST reduction did not significantly differ between the two groups (). The CST values were significantly different, before versus after treatment, in each group (both, ) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Box and whisker plots for central subfield thickness (CST) and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular edema, with or without cotton-wool spots (CWS), after three consecutive monthly intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injections. The circles represent outliers. (a, b) The CST was significantly reduced after IVB injections in both groups (all, ). (c, d) The BCVA improved significantly after IVB injection in the group without CWS, but did not significantly change in the group with CWS ( and , respectively).

The BCVA (logMAR) improved by as much as in the group with CWS and by in the group without CWS (control). There was a statistically significant difference () in the degree of change in the BCVA between the two groups. The change was significant in the control group (), but not in the group with CWS () (Figure 2).

3.1. SD-OCT Morphological Findings

The number of HF patients was not significantly different between the groups, based on OCT (), and nor was the distribution of DME types (). However, the proportion of EZ disruption was significantly different between the two groups () (Table 1).

3.2. Aqueous Concentration of Cytokines

When comparing the cytokine levels in the aqueous humor, the median levels of ICAM-1, IL-1β, IL-6, and VEGF were higher in the group with versus without CWS. The median levels of ICAM-1 and VEGF in the group with CWS were significantly higher than those in the control group ( and , respectively). However, the levels of other cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, and PlGF) did not differ between the two groups (Table 1). When using multiple logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with CWS, the aqueous ICAM-1 (≥0.36 ng/mL) was significantly associated with CWS (, ) (Table 2).

Table 2: Results of logistic regression of the effects of CWS in DME patients.

Category
(%)
Univariate
Multivariate

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Sex
Female
41 (51.25%)
Reference

Male
39 (48.75%)
1.58 (0.58, 4.42)
0.372

Age (years)
<60
47 (58.75%)
Reference

≥60
33 (41.25%)
1.85 (0.68, 5.14)
0.231

HbA1c
≤7
23 (28.75%)
Reference

>7
57 (71.25%)
0.41 (0.14, 1.20)
0.101

DMR stage
NPDR
35 (43.75%)
Reference

PDR
45 (56.25%)
1.05 (0.39, 2.93)
0.924

Hypertension
(+)
36 (45.00%)
Reference

Reference

(-)
44 (55.00%)
2.54 (0.93, 7.34)
0.074
2.34 (0.70, 8.31)
0.171

ICAM-1 (ng/mL)
<0.36
65 (81.25%)
Reference

Reference

≥0.36
15 (18.75%)
15.12 (4.29, 64.09)
<0.001
13.26 (3.58, 59.16)
<0.001

IL-1β (pg/mL)
<0.17
46 (57.50%)
Reference

≥0.17
34 (42.50%)
1.72 (0.63, 4.77)
0.289

IL-6 (pg/mL)
<8.40
40 (50.00%)

≥8.40
40 (50.00%)
1.48 (0.54, 4.12)
0.447

IL-8 (pg/mL)
<13.14
40 (50.00%)
Reference

≥13.14
40 (50.00%)
0.68 (0.24, 1.84)
0.447

IL-10 (pg/mL)
<0.65
36 (45.00%)
Reference

≥0.65
44 (55.00%)
0.67 (0.24, 1.82)
0.430

IL-17 (pg/mL)
<1.36
36 (45.00%)
Reference

≥1.36
44 (55.00%)
0.67 (0.24, 1.82)
0.430

VEGF (pg/mL)
<59.65
40 (50.00%)
Reference

Reference

≥59.65
40 (50.00%)
3.40 (1.20, 10.69)
0.026
0.321 (0.95, 12.41)
0.071

PlGF (pg/mL)
<2.85
36 (45.00%)
Reference

≥2.85
44 (55.00%)
1.47 (0.54, 4.20)
0.460

CWS: cotton-wool spot; DME: diabetic macular edema; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ICAM: intercellular adhesion molecule; IL: interleukin; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; PlGF: placental growth factor.

4. Discussion

CWS are the common fundus finding of DR patients and are thought to be a representative finding of moderate nonproliferative DR [11]. It is well-known that CWS are associated with progression of DR, but the mechanism remains unknown [11]. In the present study, we showed that the aqueous humor of DME patients with CWS showed higher levels of VEGF and ICAM-1 than that of the control group. Because VEGF levels are associated with endothelial damage of the blood-retina barrier, as well as neovascularization, the higher aqueous levels of VEGF in the CWS group could be involved in the mechanism of progression.

In our study, although there was no significant group difference in the average CST and BCVA values, the group with CWS had a worse BCVA and higher CST at baseline than the control group. The CST reduction after anti-VEGF treatment was nearly twofold greater in the group with CWS compared with the control group ( μm vs.  μm, respectively). Despite the greater CST reduction, the group without CWS showed significant improvement of the BCVA (), but no significant change of the BCVA in CWS group, after versus before anti-VEGF treatment (). We suggest that the lower BCVA at baseline and lack of improvement of the BCVA after treatment could be due to the EZ disruption. The EZ is an indicator of photoreceptor layer health, and disruption therein is reported to be associated with visual prognosis in DME patients [10]. Recent studies have shown that disorganization of retinal inner layers could be associated with ischemia [12]. Although CWS could be a manifestation of microinfarcts in the superficial retina, CWS and EZ disruption commonly represent the manifestations of retinal ischemia. In the present study, the EZ disruption was associated with the presence of CWS, so the CWS might also be associated with the visual prognosis.

The aqueous ICAM-1 and VEGF levels were elevated in the group with CWS, and multivariate logistic regression revealed an association between ICAM-1 levels and CWS. ICAM-1, one of the inflammatory markers, promotes the infiltration of leukocytes into inflammatory tissues [13]. In diabetes, the blood levels of ICAM-1 are increased, which could be a predictor of macrovascular complications such as myocardial infarct or stroke [14, 15]. In terms of DR, ICAM-1 is known to potentiate retinal vascular leukocyte adhesion, increase vascular permeability, upregulate VEGF, and promote breakdown of blood-retina barrier during the pathogenesis of DME [16, 17]. Previous studies reported that increased aqueous humor ICAM-1 and VEGF levels correlated with the severity of DME or DR [7, 9, 18]. Another study showed that an increase in blood VEGF and ICAM-1 levels is associated with a DR severity and EZ disruption [17]. Furthermore, recent studies reported that aqueous ICAM-1 and VEGF levels could be biomarkers to predict the anatomic response to anti-VEGF agents in DME [19, 20]. Based on these investigations, VEGF and ICAM-1 might play a key role in the progression of DR.

Although vitreous samples could provide a more definitive retinal pathology, studies using vitreous are few because they need vitrectomies [21–23]. Studies using vitreous samples also showed that the levels of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors increased in correlation with DME severity and increased VEGF level could be a predictable factor for progression of DR [22, 23]. Additionally, there was a study that showed significant relationships in cytokine levels between aqueous humor and vitreous sample [24].

There were a few limitations to this study. First, the release of a particular cytokine could be a result of the disease process, rather than a causal factor in the disease. The role of cytokines in DME pathogenesis cannot be definitively proven by their detection in aqueous samples. Second, our sample size was small. Increasing the sample size would have increased the statistical power, allowing the relationships of the variables studied to be determined more definitively.

In conclusion, our study showed that the presence of CWS is accompanied by increased levels of aqueous VEGF and ICAM-1. In addition, EZ disruption was greater in DME patients with CWS than in controls, and the short-term visual prognosis was poor despite an acceptable reduction of CST. Further studies including larger samples and a greater number of cytokines should be conducted to confirm the results of the present study.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

No author has a financial and proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2019R1G1A1100084).

References

X. Zhang, J. B. Saaddine, C. F. Chou et al., “Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005-2008,” JAMA, vol. 304, no. 6, pp. 649–656, 2010.

B. L. VanderBeek, N. Shah, P. C. Parikh, and L. Ma, “Trends in the care of diabetic macular edema: analysis of a national cohort,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 2, article e0149450, 2016.

N. Cheung, P. Mitchell, and T. Y. Wong, “Diabetic retinopathy,” Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9735, pp. 124–136, 2010.

J. Tang and T. S. Kern, “Inflammation in diabetic retinopathy,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 343–358, 2011.

M. Lövestam-Adrian and E. Agardh, “Photocoagulation of diabetic macular oedema; complications and visual outcome,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 667–671, 2000.

T. L. Jackson, E. Nicod, A. Angelis, F. Grimaccia, E. Pringle, and P. Kanavos, “Pars plana vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and synthesis of safety literature,” Retina, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 886–895, 2017.

J. B. Jonas, R. A. Jonas, M. Neumaier, and P. Findeisen, “Cytokine concentration in aqueous humor of eyes with diabetic macular edema,” Retina, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 2150–2157, 2012.

J. W. Kwon, J. A. Choi, and D. Jee, “Matrix metalloproteinase-1 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in the aqueous humor of diabetic macular edema patients,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 7, article e0159720, 2016.

H. Wu, D.-K. Hwang, X. Song, and Y. Tao, “Association between aqueous cytokines and diabetic retinopathy stage,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2017, Article ID 9402198, 8 pages, 2017.

A. S. Maheshwary, S. F. Oster, R. M. Yuson, L. Cheng, F. Mojana, and W. R. Freeman, “The Association Between Percent Disruption of the Photoreceptor Inner Segment- Outer Segment Junction and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 63–67.e1, 2010.

T. D. Panagiotoglou, E. S. Ganotakis, G. D. Kymionis et al., “Atorvastatin for diabetic macular edema in patients with diabetes mellitus and elevated serum cholesterol,” Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 316–322, 2010.

S. Ito, N. Miyamoto, K. Ishida, and Y. Kurimoto, “Association between external limiting membrane status and visual acuity in diabetic macular oedema,” The British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2013.

M. Hogan, J. Alvarado, and J. Weddell, Retina. Histology of the Human Eye, WB Saunders, Philadelphia London Toronto, 1971.

T. Murata, T. Ishibashi, and H. Inomata, “Immunohistochemical detection of extravasated fibrinogen (fibrin) in human diabetic retina,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 230, no. 5, pp. 428–431, 1992.

H. Mehta, S. Fraser-Bell, A. Yeung et al., “Efficacy of dexamethasone versus bevacizumab on regression of hard exudates in diabetic maculopathy: data from the BEVORDEX randomised clinical trial,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1000–1004, 2016.

C. M. Yang, “Surgical treatment for severe diabetic macular edema with massive hard exudates,” Retina, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 2000.

A. Jain, S. Saxena, V. K. Khanna, R. K. Shukla, and C. H. Meyer, “Status of serum VEGF and ICAM-1 and its association with external limiting membrane and inner segment-outer segment junction disruption in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Molecular Vision, vol. 19, pp. 1760–1768, 2013.

R. J. Hillier, E. Ojaimi, D. T. Wong et al., “Aqueous humor cytokine levels as biomarkers of disease severity in diabetic macular edema,” Retina, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 761–769, 2017.

R. J. Hillier, E. Ojaimi, D. T. Wong et al., “Aqueous humor cytokine levels and anatomic response to intravitreal ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema,” JAMA Ophthalmology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 382–388, 2018.

T. Felfeli, V. R. Juncal, R. J. Hillier et al., “Aqueous humor cytokines and long-term response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 206, pp. 176–183, 2019.

Y. Zeng, D. Cao, H. Yu et al., “Comprehensive analysis of vitreous humor chemokines in type 2 diabetic patients with and without diabetic retinopathy,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 797–805, 2019.

J. Wang, S. Chen, F. Jiang et al., “Vitreous and plasma VEGF levels as predictive factors in the progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy after vitrectomy,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 10, article e110531, 2014.

H. Funatsu, H. Noma, T. Mimura, S. Eguchi, and S. Hori, “Association of vitreous inflammatory factors with diabetic macular edema,” Ophthalmology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 73–79, 2009.

H. Funatsu, H. Yamashita, H. Noma et al., “Aqueous humor levels of cytokines are related to vitreous levels and progression of diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2005.