Journal of Environmental and Public Health
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 2438713, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2438713

Research Article

Occupational Exposure to Needle Stick and Sharp Injuries and Associated Factors among Health Care Workers in Awi Zone, Amhara Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016

Abebe Dilie,¹ Desalegn Amare,² and Tenaw Gualu¹

¹Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia
²Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Abebe Dilie; abexdmu@gmail.com

Received 7 February 2017; Revised 4 May 2017; Accepted 16 July 2017; Published 10 August 2017

Academic Editor: Ike S. Okosun

Copyright © 2017 Abebe Dilie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Needle stick and sharp injuries were one of the major risk factors for blood and body fluid borne infections at health care facilities. Objective. To assess occupational exposure to needle stick and sharp injuries and associated factors among health care workers in Awi zone, 2016. Methods. institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted among 193 health care workers. Study participants were selected using systematic random sampling technique. Result. When queried, 18.7% of the respondents’ encountered needle stick and sharp injury in the last 1 year. Participants who practiced needle recapping and had job related stress were 21.3 and 7.3 times more likely to face needle stick and sharp injury, respectively. However, those who apply universal precautions and acquire the required skill were 99% and 96% times less likely to face needle stick and sharp injury, respectively, than their counterparts. Conclusion and Recommendation. The prevalence of needle stick and sharp injury was relatively low as compared to previous studies. Recapping of needle after use, job related stress, not applying universal precautions, and lack of the required skill were associated with needle stick and sharp injuries. Therefore, health care providers should apply universal precaution.

1. Introduction

Every year, hundreds of thousands of health care workers are exposed to dangerous and deadly blood borne pathogens through contaminated needle stick and sharps injuries (NSIs) because of performing daily procedures in clinical activities. These exposures can carry the risk of infection with with Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), the virus that causes AIDS [1].

The risk of infection following needle stick exposure is 1.9% to greater than 40% for HBV infections, 2.7% to 10% for HCV infections, and 0.2% to 0.44% for HIV infections. It is estimated that NSIs cause approximately 66,000 HBV infections, 16,000 HCV infections, and 200 to 5000 HIV infections among health care workers annually. However, postexposure management was generally poor [2].

A study in in Bahir Dar, Amhara, Ethiopia, showed that 65.9% of health care providers were exposed to blood and body fluids in the past year, of which 29.0% were needle stick injuries [3]. NSIs can be regarded as preventable, if health care workers adopt a comprehensive program that addresses institutional, behavioral, and device-related factors that contribute to the occurrence of needle stick injuries in health care workers [4].

A quasi-experimental study concludes that occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens can be prevented through improved knowledge and behavior and reduced the number of NSI among health care providers [5].

A study indicated that the highest incidence of NSIs was seen in health care providers and that the associated factors were age, level of education, number of shifts per month, and history of related training. The highest rate of NSIs was related to instrument preparation, injection, and recapping of used needles [6].

NSIs are frequent and important cause of morbidity and mortality in health care workers who come into contact with patient blood and body fluids [7]. Therefore, assessing the magnitude and factors associated with needle stick and sharp injury among health care workers is very important.

2. Methods and Materials

An institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May, 2016, to assess occupational exposure of NSI among health care providers in Awi zone.

All health care providers who work both at private and public health institutions in Awi zone who were willing to participate and available during study period were included in the study. However, health care providers who were in annual leave and seriously ill during data collection period within the zone were excluded from the study.

The sample size was determined based on single population proportion formula with 5% marginal error and 95% confidence interval by considering 42% proportion prevalence of NSI among health care workers from Arba Minch, southern Ethiopia [8]. Besides this, by considering correction formula and 10% nonresponse rate, a total of 213 health care workers were included in this study.

Study participants were selected using systematic random sampling after proportional allocation was done for each professional category in hospitals and health centers by including all districts with in the zone.

The outcome variable of the study was occupational exposure to needle stick and sharp injury. The independent variables of the study were sociodemographic factors (sex, age, religion, marital status, level of education, monthly salary, and work experience), work environment related factors (health and safety information access, work shift, availability of safety box, sharp disposal, application of universal precautions, needle recap, and working with assistance during procedure), and behavioral related factors (substance use, sleeping disorder, job satisfaction, job related stress, and perceived skill acquisition).

Data were collected using structured self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was adapted by reviewing literatures of similar studies on needle stick and sharp injury [1, 9]. The data were collected by 4 trained diploma nurses and were supervised by 2 public health professionals having previous experience in data collection. Continuous follow-up and supervision were also made by principal investigator throughout the data collection period.

Data quality was assured by training of data collectors and supervisors, pretesting the questionnaire on similar setting (10% of total sample) that was not included in the study, close supervision and assistance of data collectors, and checking filled questionnaires on daily basis for completeness, clarity, and accuracy of data.

The data were entered in to EPI-data version 3.1, and then the data were cleaned and analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 statistical software. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was computed to assess statistical association between the outcome variable and independent variables using odds ratio; significance of statistical association was assured or tested using 95% confidence interval (CI) and value (<0.05).

The following terms were described in such a way in this study.

(i) Needle Sticks and Sharp Injury (NSI). It is any kind of injury which occurred on the health care worker in relation to his/her job in the health institution within 1-month period.

(ii) Severe NSI. It is deep stick/cut or profuse bleeding related to injury.

(iii) Moderate NSI. It is skin punctured and some bleeding associated with injury.

(iv) Superficial NSI. It is little or no bleeding related to injury.

(v) Perceived Skill. It is the acquisition of required skill to perform procedures as reported by the health care provider.

The study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance from Debre Markos University, College of Health Sciences, Research and Ethical Review Committee. After obtaining official letter from the college, a permission and support letter were provided to Awi zone hospitals and health centers before data collection. The study participants were informed about the objective, rationale, and expected outcomes of the study and written consent was provided for guaranteeing their choice of participation or refusal. All the information was recorded anonymously and confidentiality was assured throughout the study.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

A total of 213 eligible health workers were included in the study. Of these, only 193 health workers voluntarily agreed to participate in this study, and 20 either refused or submitted largely incomplete questionnaires. This resulted in a response rate of 90.6%.

Of all participants, the majority, 172 (89.1%), were orthodox Christian by religion and three-fourths (75%) of the respondents had ≤5 years’ work experience. Moreover, the age of the participants included in this study ranged between 22 and 48 years with mean age of 28.25 (SD = ±6.149) years (Table 1).

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of health care workers in Awi zone, 2016.

Variable
Frequency (%)

Sex

    Male
106 (54.9)

    Female
87 (45.1)

Age

    20–29 years
149 (77.2)

    30–39 years
29 (15)

    ≥40 years
15 (7.8)

Religion

    Orthodox
172 (89.1)

    Muslim
13 (6.7)

    Protestant
8 (4.2)

Marital status

    Single
103 (53.4)

    Married
90 (46.6)

Educational level

    Diploma
95 (49.2)

    Degree
83 (43)

    Masters
13 (6.7)

    Specialty
2 (1)

Monthly income (in Ethiopian Birr)

    <3000
116 (60.1)

    3001–4999
22 (11.4)

    ≥5000
55 (28.5)

Service year

    0–5 years
145 (75.1)

    6–10 years
33 (17.1)

    ≥11 years
15 (7.8)

Profession

    Nursing
76 (39.4)

    Public health
32 (16.6)

    Midwifery
49 (25.4)

    Laboratory
24 (12.4)

    Physician
12 (6.2)

3.2. Needle Stick and Sharp Injury (NSI)

Among the respondents, 36 (18.7%) encountered NSI in the last 1 year. Of these, 28 (77.8%) were due to needles, 2 (5.6%) were due to surgical equipment, and 6 (16.6%) were due to medication ampoule or vial. About 86% of NSI occurred when performing injection (Table 2).

Table 2: NSI among health care providers in Awi zone, 2016.

NSI
Frequency (%)

Did you encounter NSI?

    Yes
36 (18.7)

    No
157 (81.3)

Which device caused the injury?

    Needles
28 (77.8)

    Surgical equipment
2 (5.6)

    Medication ampoule/vial
6 (16.6)

Task performed during injury

    Suturing
2 (5.5)

    Injection
31 (86)

    Drawing sample
2 (5.5)

    Recap of needle
1 (3)

Type of injury

    Severe
8 (22.2)

    Moderate
9 (25)

    Superficial
19 (52.8)

Was source patient identifiable?

    Yes
15 (41.6)

    No
21 (58.4)

Did you receive care after injury?

    Yes
23 (63.8)

    No
13 (36.2)

Lancet, suturing needle, scalpel, and towel clip. Deep stick/cut or profuse bleeding. Skin punctured, some bleeding. Little or no bleeding.

3.3. Work Environment Related Factors for NSI

Among the total respondents, 172 (89.1%) apply universal precautions during procedures for protection and 30 (15.5%) of the respondents had reported that there are needles and sharp materials outside safety box (Table 3).

Table 3: Health care providers working environment condition in Awi zone, 2016.

Working environment risk factors
Frequency (%)

Working institution

    Hospital
83 (43)

    Health center
110 (57)

Shift work

    Yes
66 (34.2)

    No
127 (65.8)

Information access to safety

    Yes
185 (95.9)

    No
8 (4.1)

Use of universal precaution

    Yes
172 (89.1)

    No
21 (10.9)

Did you recap needles?

    Yes
49 (25.4)

    No
144 (74.6)

Availability of safety box

    Yes
189 (97.9)

    No
4 (2.1)

Presence of needles and sharp materials outside safety box

    Yes
30 (15.5)

    No
163 (84.5)

Condition of safety box

    Overfilled
164 (85)

    Torn out
13 (6.7)

    Empty
12 (6.2)

    Others
4 (2.1)

Sharp waste final disposal

    Burn and burry
35 (18.1)

    Incinerator
150 (77.7)

    Open dumping
8 (4.2)

3.4. Behavioral Risk Factors of Health Care Workers

Out of the respondents, 53 (27.6%) believed NSI is nonpreventable and 33 (17.1%) used substance. Moreover, 118 (61.1%) were satisfied with their job and 97 (50.3%) had sleep disturbance (Table 4).

Table 4: Behavioral characteristics of health care workers in Awi zone, 2016.

Behavioral risk factor
Frequency (%)

Sleep disturbance

    Yes
97 (50.3)

    No
96 (49.7)

Perceived skill acquisition

    Yes
65 (33.7)

    No
128 (66.3)

Doing with assistance

    Yes
19 (9.8)

    No
174 (90.2)

Substance use

    Yes
33 (17.1)

    No
160 (82.9)

Job satisfaction

    Yes
118 (61.1)

    No
75 (38.9)

Job related stress

    Yes
24 (12.4)

    No
169 (87.6)

Belief on the risky nature of NSI

    High risk
100 (51.8)

    Moderate risk
88 (45.6)

    Low risk
5 (2.6)

Belief on preventability of NSI

    Preventable
140 (72.5)

    Nonpreventable
53 (27.6)

3.5. Factors Associated with Needle Stick and Sharp Injuries

In bivariate logistic regression analysis, sex of the respondent, profession, information access to health and safety, application of universal precaution, recapping of needle, perceived skill acquisition, and job related stress were statistically associated with NSI with value less than 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (Table 5).

Table 5: Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with NSI in Awi zone, 2016.

Needle stick and sharp injury (NSI)

Variable
Response
Yes
No

value

Sex
Male
27 (75%)
79 (50.3%)
2.9 (1.3, 6.7)
10 (1.5, 16)
0.014

Female
9 (25%)
78 (49.7%)
1
1

Profession
Nursing
11 (30.6%)
65 (41.4%)
5.9 (1.6, 21.6)
0.75 (0.09, 5.8)
0.79

Public health
6 (16.7%)
26 (16.6%)
4.3 (1.1, 18.2)
0.43 (0.06, 2.9)
0.39

Midwifery
9 (25%)
40 (25.5%)
4.4 (1.2, 17.1)
0.24 (0.01, 3.6)
0.30

Laboratory
4 (11.1%)
20 (12.7%)
5 (1.0, 23.7)
0.17 (0.01, 1.5)
0.12

Physician
6 (16.7%)
6 (3.8%)
1
1

Information access
Yes
32 (88.9%)
153 (97.5%)
0.20 (0.5, 0.8)
0.25 (0.01, 5.4)
0.37

No
4 (11.1%)
4 (2.5%)
1
1

Use universal precaution
Yes
18 (50%)
154 (98.1%)
0.01 (0.005, 0.073)
0.01 (0.002, 0.1)
0.001

No
18 (50%)
3 (1.9%)
1
1

Recap of needle
Yes
22 (61.1%)
27 (17.2%)
7.5 (3.4, 16.6)
21.3 (4.4, 23)
0.001

No
14 (38.9%)
130 (82.8%)
1
1

Perceived skill
Yes
6 (16.7%)
59 (37.6%)
0.33 (0.1, 0.8)
0.04 (0.003, 0.57)
0.017

No
30 (83.3%)
98 (62.4%)
1
1

Job related stress
Yes
11 (30.6%)
13 (8.3%)
4.8 (1.9, 12)
7.3 (1.6, 33.2)
0.010

No
25 (69.4%)
144 (91.7%)
1
1

: crude odds ratio; : adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.

After bivariate analysis, only those variables which were significantly related ( value < 0.05) were entered for further multivariate analysis. By adjusting potential confounders in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only sex, application of universal precaution, recapping of needle, perceived skill acquisition, and job related stress were significantly associated with NSI. But participant’s profession and information access to health and safety were not significantly associated with NSI in multivariate analysis.

Application of universal precaution and perceived skill acquisition were negatively associated with NSI. Health care providers who use universal precautions were 99% times less likely to face NSI [AOR = 0.01 (0.002, 0.1)] as compared to those who did not use universal precaution. Moreover, health workers who had acquired the required skill were 96% times less likely to encounter NSI [AOR = 0.04 (0.003, 0.57)] than those who did not have the required skill.

Similarly, male health workers were 10 times more likely to encounter NSI [AOR = 10 (1.5, 16)] than females. Health workers who had job related stress were 7.3 times more likely to face NSI [AOR = 7.3 (1.6, 33.2)] than those who did not have job related stress. Moreover, health workers who recap needles were 21.3 times more likely to encounter NSI [AOR = 21.3 (4.4, 23)] than those who did not recap needle.

4. Discussion

The study showed that 18.7% of the respondents had needle stick and sharp injury at least once in the previous 1 year. This finding is lower than a study done in Ondo state, Nigeria, where 55.8% of health care providers encounter needle stick and sharp injury [10]. This might be due to the presence of trainings and safety guidelines that advocate for proper patient and self-care as well as study time differences. However, it is relatively similar with a study done in Bale zone, Ethiopia, where 19.1% had needle stick and sharp injury [11]. This might be due to having relatively similar sociodemographic characteristics.

The most important factor that affects needle stick and sharp injury was application of universal precautions during procedure. Health care providers who use universal precaution were 99% times less likely to face needle stick and sharp injuries [AOR = 0.01 (0.002, 0.1)] as compared to those who did not use universal precaution. This might be due to the fact that applying universal precautions can act as a barrier from exposure to blood and body fluid.

Another factor that affects needle stick and sharp injury in this study was recapping of needle after use. Health workers who recap needles were 21.3 times more likely to face needle stick and sharp injury [AOR = 21.3 (4.4, 23)] than those who did not recap needle. A similar study done in Arba Minch also showed having significant association between NSI and recapping of needle [AOR = 4.2 (1.5, 12.0)] [8]. This might be due to increased risk of injury when recapping needle after use.

In this study, male health workers were 10 times more likely to face needle stick and sharp injury (AOR = 10 (1.5, 6.6)) than females. This is relatively similar with a study done at Ondo state Nigeria, where male workers are likely to sustain more NSIs than female workers (OR = [1.987 (1.061–3.721)]) [10]. This may be due to the fact that females are better in safety precautions compared to males.

Moreover, health workers who had perceived skill acquisition were 96% times less likely to encounter needle and sharp injury [AOR = 0.04 (0.003, 0.57)] than those who did not have the required skill. Another study which was in United States also showed that lack of skill accounts for 12% occurrence of needle stick injury [12]. This might be due to the fact that not knowing when and how to apply the required skill can also expose professionals at risk of NSI.

In addition, health workers who had job related stress were 7.3 times more likely to face needle stick and sharp injury (AOR = 7.3 (1.6, 33.2)) than those who did not have job related stress. However, this contradicts a study done at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, where those who were satisfied on their job were about 3 times more likely to sustain needle stick and sharp injury than those who were not satisfied on their job [AOR = 2.78 (1.01, 7.63)] [13].

5. Strengths and Limitations of the Study

5.1. Strength of the Study

The major strength of this study lies in the fact that it has attempted to assess occupational exposure to NSI and associated factors for the first time in the study area. Besides this, both private and public health institutions within the zone were included to make the study representative.

5.2. Limitation of the Study

The study might be subjected to response set bias from the respondent. Since it was cross-sectional study design, it was difficult to draw causal relationships.

We exclude seriously ill participants as they may suffer from needle stick and sharp acquired blood borne pathogens.

6. Conclusion and Recommendation

The prevalence of needle stick and sharp injury was relatively low as compared to previous studies.

The most important factors that cause needle stick and sharp injury were recapping of needle after use, job related stress, not using universal precautions during procedure, and lack of the required skill. Safe handling and disposal of needle stick and sharp materials enable preventing blood borne infections. Therefore, health care providers should get training to fill the skill gap, apply universal precaution during procedure, and never recap needles after use.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Debre Markos University for financial support; the authors would also like to extend their gratitude to all the study participants and data collectors.

References

AN. Association, “American Nurses Association’s Needlestick Prevention Guide, 2002 [acesso 16 ago 2011]”.

X. Lin, W. Qing-yan, K. Hong, and T. Si-yuan, “The epidemiology of needle stick and sharp Injuries in central sterile supply department of hospitals in Hunan Province,” International Journal of Infection Control, vol. 10, no. 1, 2014.

M. A. Yenesew and G. A. Fekadu, “Occupational exposure to blood and body fluids among health care professionals in Bahir Dar Town, Northwest Ethiopia,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2014.

A. R. and D. V., “A cross sectional study to evaluate needle stick injuries among health care workers in Malabar medical college, Calicut, Kerala, India,” International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 3340–3344, 2016.

H. Wang, K. Fennie, G. He, J. Burgess, and A. B. Williams, “A training programme for prevention of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens: Impact on knowledge, behaviour and incidence of needle stick injuries among student nurses in Changsha, People's Republic of China,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 2003.

H. Motaarefi, H. Mahmoudi, E. Mohammadi, and A. Hasanpour-Dehkordi, “Factors associated with needlestick injuries in health care occupations: A systematic review,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. IE01–IE04, 2016.

S. Momani, M. Hdaib, and YW. Najjar, “Sustained reduction in needlestick and Sharp injuries among nursing students: an initiative educational program. Educ Res,” in Najjar YW. Sustained reduction in needlestick and Sharp injuries among nursing students: an initiative educational program. Educ Res, p. 654, 9, 654-8, 2013.

W. G. Kelebore, M. Mamo, L. Yilma, K. Shewalem, S. Shakayto, and M. Kelile, “Assessment of Factors Affecting Needle Stick and Sharp Injuries Among Health Professionals and Cleaners in Arba Minch General Hospital, Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2015 G. C,” Science Journal of Public Health, vol. 4, no. 6, p. 463, 2016.

PS. Rajput, MK. Doibale, VK. Sonkar, IF. Inamdar, A. Nair, and AD. Shingare, “Prevalence of needle stick injuries and associated risk factors among nurses in a tertiary care hospital,” International Journal of Preventive and Public Health Sciences, vol. 1, p. 17.

O. Oluwatosin, M. Oladapo, and M. Asuzu, “Needlestick injuries among health care workers in Ondo State, Nigeria,” International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 31, 2016.

T. Bekele, A. Gebremariam, M. Kaso, and K. Ahmed, “Factors associated with occupational needle stick and sharps injuries among hospital healthcare workers in bale zone, Southeast Ethiopia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 10, Article ID 140382, 2015.

M. A. Makary, A. Al-Attar, C. G. Holzmueller et al., “Needlestick injuries among surgeons in training,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 26, pp. 2693–2699, 2007.

L. Walle, E. Abebe, M. Tsegaye, H. Franco, D. Birhanu, and M. Azage, “Factors associated with needle stick and sharp injuries among healthcare workers in Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia: facility based cross-sectional survey,” International Journal of Infection Control, vol. 9, no. 4, 2013.