Journal of Function Spaces
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 2684023, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2684023

Research Article

Certain Geometric Properties of Generalized Dini Functions

Muhey U. Din,¹ Mohsan Raza,¹ Saqib Hussain,² and Maslina Darus³

¹Department of Mathematics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
²Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, Pakistan
³Faculty of Science and Technology, School of Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

Correspondence should be addressed to Mohsan Raza; mohsan976@yahoo.com

Received 20 March 2018; Accepted 25 June 2018; Published 11 July 2018

Academic Editor: Mitsuru Sugimoto

Copyright © 2018 Muhey U. Din et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

We are mainly interested in some geometric properties for the combinations of generalized Bessel functions of the first kind and their derivatives known as Dini functions. In particular, we study the starlikeness of order convexity of order , and close-to-convexity of order for normalized Dini function. We also study close-to-convexity with respect to certain star-like functions. Further, we obtain conditions on generalized Dini function to belong to the Hardy space

1. Introduction

Let be the class of functions of the form

analytic in the open unit disc and denote the class of all functions in which are univalent in . Let , , and denote the classes of star-like, convex, close-to-convex and strongly star-like functions of order , respectively, and they are defined as

It is clear that

If and are analytic functions, then the function is said to be subordinate to , written as , if there exist a Schwarz function which is analytic with and such that Furthermore, if the function is univalent in then we have the following equivalent relation:

Special functions have great importance in pure and applied mathematics. The wide use of these functions has attracted many researchers to work on the different directions. Geometric properties of special functions such as hypergeometric functions, Bessel functions, Struve functions, Mittag-Leffler functions, Wright functions, and some other related functions are an ongoing part of research in geometric function theory. We refer to some geometric properties of these functions [1–10] and references therein.

Consider the second-order homogeneous differential equation

where , and are complex numbers. The particular solution of the homogenous differential equation (6) is called the generalized Bessel functions of the first kind of order It is defined as

where denotes the gamma function. The function unifies the Bessel, modified Bessel, and spherical Bessel functions.

Special cases

For , we have the Bessel functions of first kind of order , defined as

For , we obtain the modified Bessel functions of first kind of order whose series form is given as

For , we have the spherical Bessel functions of first kind of order , given as

 For more details about these functions, see [5, 11]. Recently, Deniz et al. [12] studied the function which is defined by the relation as

 where Using the well-known Pochhammer symbol

 we obtain the series form of the function as

 where

Bessel functions are indispensable in many branches of mathematics and applied mathematics. Thus, it is important to study their properties in many aspects. We consider the generalized Dini functions defined as

where , and . For , we obtain the normalized Dini function of order of the form

By putting and , we obtain the following particular cases of normalized Dini functions

Recently Baricz et al. [13] studied the close-to-convexity of Dini functions and some monotonicity properties and functional inequalities for the modified Dini function are discussed in [5]. Further some geometric properties of Dini functions are studied in [14].

This paper studies the Dini function given by the power series (14). We determine the conditions on parameters that ensure the Dini function to be star-like of order , convex of order , and close-to-convex of order We also study the convexity in the domain Sufficient conditions on univalency of an integral operator defined by Dini function are also studied. We find the conditions on normalized Dini function to belong to the Hardy space

To prove our main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 1 (see [15]). If satisfy for each , then is convex in

Lemma 2 (see [16]). Let with , and with , If satisfies

then the integral operator

is analytic and univalent in .

Lemma 3 (see [17]). Let be convex and univalent in the open unit disc with condition Let be analytic in the open unit disc with condition and in the open unit disc. Then, , we obtain

Lemma 4 (see [18]). If satisfies the inequality

then

Lemma 5 (see [19]). If the function is analytic in and in addition or , then is close-to-convex function with respect to the convex function Moreover, if the odd function is analytic in and if or , then is univalent in .

2. Geometric Properties of Normalized Dini Functions

Theorem 6. Let , , , and with and . Then the following assertions are true:

(i)If < , then (ii)If − < , then (iii)If < , then (iv)If , then

Proof. We use the inequality to prove the starlikeness of order for the function So by using the well-known triangle inequality

with the equality

and the inequalities

we obtain

Furthermore, if we use reverse triangle inequality

and the inequalities

then we get

By combining inequalities (25) and (28), we get

So, is star-like function of order , where + −
(ii) To prove the convexity of order of function , we have to show that By using the well-known triangle inequality

with equality

and the inequalities

we have

Moreover, if we use reverse triangle inequality

with equality

and the inequalities

we get

By combining inequalities (33) and (37), we have

This implies that is convex function of order , where + − −
(iii) Using inequality (33) and Lemma 4, we have

where . This shows that Therefore
(iv) To prove that , we have to show that , where By using the well-known triangle inequality

with the equality

and the inequality

we have

Therefore, for

Corollary 7. By using Theorem 6 assertions (i) and (iv), we get the following corollary:

If where , then .If where , then .If where , then .If where , then .

Putting in Theorem 6, we have the following results.

Corollary 8. Let , , , and . Then the following assertions are true.
If + + , then .
If + + , then .
If + + , then .
If , then .

Corollary 9. By putting and in Corollary 8, we obtain the following results:
If , then .
If , then .
If , then .
If , then .

Remark 10. It is easy to see that our results improve the results of [14] as special cases of parameters. Some particular cases regarding Corollary 9 are given below.

Corollary 11. If , then .
If , then .
If , then .
If , then .

Theorem 12. Let , , , and . If + < , then is convex in .

Proof. By using the well-known triangle inequality

with the equality , , and the inequalities

we obtain

In view of Lemma 1, is convex in , if , but this is true under the hypothesis.

Remark 13. When we put , our results are better than [14].
Consider the integral operator , where , ,

Here In the next theorem, we obtain the conditions so that is univalent in

Theorem 14. Let , , , and . Let and suppose that is a positive real number such that in the open unit disc. If

then is univalent in

Proof. A calculation gives us

Since , then, by the Schwarz Lemma, triangle inequality, and (29), we obtain

This shows that the given integral operator satisfies Becker’s criterion for univalence, and hence is univalent in

3. Strong Starlikeness

In this section, we are mainly interested about some sufficient conditions under which the normalized Dini function belongs to the class of strong starlikeness of order

Theorem 15. Let , , , and . If , then , where

and

Proof. By using the well-known triangle inequality

with the equality , , and the inequalities

we obtain

For and from (54), we concluded that

With the help of Lemma 3, take with and , and we get

As a result

By using (56) and (58), we obtain

which implies that for

Corollary 16. For , where is the positive root of , then

4. Close-to-Convexity with respect to Certain Functions

Recently many authors discuss the close-to-convexity of some special functions with respect to certain functions. Here, we are also interested in the close-to-convexity of normalized Dini function.

Theorem 17. Let , , , and . If , then is close-to-convex with respect to .

Proof. Set

To prove that is close-to-convex with respect to the function we use Lemma 5. Therefore, we have to prove that is a decreasing sequence. After some computations, we obtain

By using the conditions on parameters, we easily observe that for all , and thus is a decreasing sequence. By Lemma 5 it follows that is close-to-convex with respect to the function

Theorem 18. Let , , , and . If , then is close-to-convex with respect to

Proof. Set

Here , and therefore we have and for all To prove our main result we will prove that is a decreasing sequence. After some computations, we obtain

By using the conditions on parameters we easily observe that for all , and thus is a decreasing sequence. By Lemma 5 it follows that is close-to-convex with respect to the function

5. Hardy Spaces of Dini Function

Let denote the class of all analytic functions in the open unit disk and denote the space of all bounded functions on . This is a Banach algebra with respect to the norm

We denote for the space of all functions such that admits a harmonic majorant. is a Banach space if the norm of is defined to be -th root of the least harmonic majorant of for some fixed . Another equivalent definition of norm is given as follows: Let , and set

Then the function if is bounded for all It is clear that

For some details see [20]. It is also known [20] that, for in , then

Hardy spaces of hypergeometric functions are recently studied by Ponnusamy [21]. Baricz [2] uses the idea of Ponnusamy and found the Hardy spaces of Bessel functions while Yamur and Orhan [10] studied the same problem for generalized Struve functions. Similarly Yamur [22] studied the problem for Lommel functions and Raza et al. [9] studied the same problem for Wright functions.

To prove our main results we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 19 (see [23]). , where with and the value of is best possible.

Lemma 20 (see [24]). For and , we have or equivalently .

Lemma 21 (see [25]). If the function , convex of order , where , is not of the form

for some complex numbers and and for some real number then the following statements hold:
There exists , such that .
If , then there exists , such that .
If , then

The lemma defined below also plays an important role to find our main results.

Theorem 22. Let and + − < . Then

   for ;

   for .

Proof. By using the definition of Hypergeometric function

we have

for , , and and for On the other hand

This implies that is not of the form for and for , respectively. Also, from part (ii) of Theorem 6, is convex of order Hence, by using Lemma 21, we have required result.

Theorem 23. Let and . Then the convolution is in .

Proof. Let . Then it is clear that Using Corollary 9 of part (iv), we have . Since , therefore by using Lemma 19  . It is also clear that is an entire function and therefor is entire. This implies that is bounded. Hence, we have the required result.

Theorem 24. Let with , and then , , and . If , with , then , where

Proof. Let , and then Now, from Theorem 6 of part (iv), we have . By using Lemma 19 and the fact that , we have , where Consequently, we have .

Corollary 25. Let , , and then . If, , then .

Corollary 26. Let . If, then .

By using Theorem 23 and Corollary 25, then we have the following corollary.

Corollary 27. If , then the convolutions and are in . Moreover, if , then and .

Data Availability

No data were used to support this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The work here is supported by UKM Grant no. GUP-2017-064.

References

I. Aktas, Á. Baricz, and N. Yagmur, “Bounds for the radii of univalence of some special functions,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 825–843, 2017.

Á. Baricz, “Bessel transforms and Hardy space of generalized Bessel functions,” Mathematica, vol. 48, no. 71, pp. 127–136, 2006.

Á. Baricz, Generalized Bessel Functions of the First Kind, vol. 1994 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.

Á. Baricz, M. Çaglar, and E. Deniz, “Starlikeness of Bessel functions and their derivatives,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 439–449, 2016.

Á. Baricz, S. Ponnusamy, and S. Singh, “Modified Dini functions: monotonicity patterns and functional inequalities,” Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 120–142, 2016.

Á. Baricz and R. Szász, “The radius of convexity of normalized Bessel functions,” Analysis Mathematica, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 141–151, 2015.

M. U. Din, M. Raza, N. Yagmur, and S. N. Malik, “On partial sums of Wright functions,” UPB Scientific Bulletin, Series A, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 79–90, 2018.

S. Kanas, S. R. Mondal, and A. D. Mohammed, “Relations between the generalized Bessel functions and the Janowski class,” Mathematical Inequalities & Applications, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 165–178, 2018.

M. Raza, M. U. Din, and S. N. Malik, “Certain Geometric Properties of Normalized Wright Functions,” Journal of Function Spaces, vol. 2016, Article ID 1896154, 8 pages, 2016.

N. Yagmur and H. Orhan, “Hardy space of generalized Struve functions,” Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 929–936, 2014.

G. N. Watson, A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 1944.

E. Deniz, H. Orhan, and H. M. Srivastava, “Some sufficient conditions for univalence of certain families of integral operators involving generalized Bessel functions,” Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 883–917, 2011.

Á. Baricz, E. Deniz, and N. Yagmur, “Close-to-convexity of normalized Dini functions,” Mathematische Nachrichten, vol. 289, no. 14-15, pp. 1721–1726, 2016.

E. Deniz, Ş. Gören, and M. Çağlar, “Starlikeness and convexity of the generalized Dini functions,” in AIP Conference Proceedings 1833, 020004, 2017.

P. T. Mocanu, “Some starlike conditions for analytic functions,” Revue Roumaine des Mathematiques Pures et Appliquees, vol. 33, pp. 117–124, 1988.

V. Pescar, “A new generalization of Ahlfors's and Becker's criterion of univalence,” Malaysian Mathematical Society (Second Series), vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 53-54, 1996.

D. J. Hallenbeck and S. Ruscheweyh, “Subordination by convex functions,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 52, pp. 191–195, 1975.

S. Owa, M. Nunokawa, H. Saitoh, and H. M. Srivastava, “Close-to-convexity, starlikeness, and convexity of certain analytic functions,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2002.

S. Ozaki, “On the theory of multivalent functions,” Science Reports of the Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku, vol. 2, pp. 167–188, 1935.

P. L. Duren, Theory of Hp Spaces, A series of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 38, Academic Press New York, London, UK, 1970.

S. Ponnusamy, “The Hardy spaces of hypergeometric functions,” Complex Variables, Theory and Application, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 83–96, 1996.

N. Yagmur, “Hardy space of Lommel functions,” Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1035–1046, 2015.

J. Stankiewicz and Z. Stankiewicz, “Some applications of the Hadamard convolution in the theory of functions,” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, vol. 40, pp. 251–265, 1987.

S. Ponnusamy, “Inclusion theorems for convolution product of second order polylogarithms and functions with the derivative in a halfplane,” Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 695–733, 1998.

P. J. Eenigenburg and F. R. Keogh, “The Hardy class of some univalent functions and their derivatives,” Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 17, pp. 335–346, 1970.