This paper presents an adaptive fuzzy synchronization control strategy for a class of different uncertain fractional-order chaotic/hyperchaotic systems with unknown external disturbances via T-S fuzzy systems, where the parallel distributed compensation technology is provided to design adaptive controller with fractional adaptation laws. T-S fuzzy models are employed to approximate the unknown nonlinear systems and tracking error signals are used to update the parametric estimates. The asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system and the boundedness of the states and parameters are guaranteed by fractional Lyapunov theory. This approach is also valid for synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems with the same system structure. One constructive example is given to verify the feasibility and superiority of the proposed method.
Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province1808085MF1811. Introduction
Fractional calculus is a mathematical topic being more than 300 years old, which can be traced back to the birth of integer-order calculus. The fundamentals results of fractional calculus were concluded in [1]. At present, researchers found that fractional differential equations not only improve the veracity in modeling physical systems but also generate a lot of applications in physics, electrical engineering, robotics, control systems, and chemical mixing [2–11]. In addition, the chaotic behavior has been discovered in many fractional-order systems, for instance, the fractional-order Chen’s system, the fractional-order Chua’s system, and the fractional-order Liu system. In view of chaotic potential value in control systems and secure communication [12], chaos synchronization was studied by more and more researches [13, 14].
The conventional nonlinear systems control approaches suffer from discontented performance resulting from structure and parametric uncertainties, external disturbances. Usually, it is very hard to provide accurate mathematical models [15–25]. To control these uncertain systems, adaptive fuzzy/neural-network control was proposed [26, 27]. This method is effective and superior for handling parametric and structure uncertainties, external disturbances in integer-order nonlinear systems [28, 29], where tracking error is developed to update adjusted parameters and fuzzy logic systems or neural networks are introduced to model unknown physical systems as well as to approximate unknown nonlinear functions. There are two types of fuzzy logic systems: Mamdani type and T-S type. T-S fuzzy logic system is first proposed by Takagi and Sugeno [30]. Subsequently, many works found that T-S fuzzy systems can uniformly approximate any continuous functions on a compact set with random accuracy based on the Weierstrass approximation theorem [31]. Moreover, it was also shown that the approximation ability of T-S fuzzy systems was better than the Mamdani fuzzy systems [32]. Therefore, many studies focused on the chaos synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems via T-S fuzzy models. For example, synchronization of fractional-order modified chaotic system via new linear control, backstepping control, and T-S fuzzy approaches was investigated in [33]. Impulsive control for fractional-order chaotic system was presented in [34]. Other results about the synchronization of a fractional-order chaotic system via T-S fuzzy approaches can be found in [35, 36]. However, only chaos synchronization of fractional-order nonlinear systems with same structure based on T-S fuzzy systems is considered in above previous works.
This work investigates the chaos synchronization of fractional-order chaotic systems with different structures based on T-S fuzzy systems, where external disturbances in slaves system are considered. T-S fuzzy systems with random rule consequents are introduced to model controlled systems, whereas T-S fuzzy systems that have the same rule consequents with Mamdani fuzzy systems are used to approximate unknown nonlinear functions. The asymptotic stability of closed-loop system is proofed based on fractional Lyapunov stability theory. Compared to previous literature, the main contributions of this paper are as follows:
(1) This paper first considers the chaos synchronization of the master system and slave system with different structure based on T-S fuzzy systems, and the external disturbances are assumed to be unknown. The required knowledge of the disturbances is weaker than above previous works, for example, in [34–36]. In these works, the external disturbances are assumed to be bounded with known upper bounds. However, in our control method, we do not need to know the exact value of the upper bounds of external disturbances.
(2) T-S fuzzy logic systems are used to model the controlled system and the final outputs of system can be obtained. By combining the adaptive fuzzy control method and parallel distributed compensation technique, an adaptive controller with fractional-order laws is designed. The proposed method is superior to some works based on linear matrix inequality (LMI) and modified LMI [37].
2. Fundamentals of Fractional Calculus and Fuzzy Logic Systems2.1. Fractional Calculus
There are two frequently used definitions for fractional integration and differentiation: Riemann-Liouville (denote R-L) and Caputo definitions. In this paper, we will consider Caputo’s definition, whose initial conditions are as the same form of the integer-order one [38–40]. The fractional integral is designed as [1](1)0CDt-μut=1Γμ∫0tuξt-ξ1-μdξ,where μ>0, n-1≤μ<n, and Γ(·) is Euler’s Gamma function, which is defined as Γ(s)=∫0∞ts-1e-tdt. The fractional derivative operator is given as(2)0CDtμut=1Γn-μ∫0tunξt-ξμ+1-ndξ.
Some useful properties of fractional calculus that will be used in the controller design are listed as follows.
Property 1 (see [1, 41–44]).
Caputo’s fractional derivative and integral are linear operations with λ1,λ2,μ∈R(3)0CDtμλ1u1t+λ2u2t=λ10CDtμu1t+λ20CDtμu2t.
Property 2.
Let x(t)∈Cn[0,T]. Then we have(4)0CDt-μ0CDtμut=ut-∑k=0n-1uk0k!tk.
Property 3 (see [1, 45–47]).
The Laplace transform of (2) is(5)L0CDtμft=sμFs-∑k=0n-1sμ-k-1fk0, with F(s)=L[f(t)].
Definition 4.
The two-parameter Mittag-Leffler function was defined by [1](6)Eα,βz=∑k=0+∞zkΓkα+β, with α,β>0 and z∈C. The Laplace transform of the Mittag-Leffler function is given as(7)Ltβ-1Eα,β-atα=sα-βsα+a.
In the subsequent paper, we only consider the case that μ∈(0,1).
2.2. Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Logic Systems
Unlike the Mamdani fuzzy logic systems, the ith rule of a Multi-Input and Multioutput general fractional-order Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy systems can be expressed as follows (i=1,2,⋯,N):
Ri: If x1(t) is F1i and ⋯ and xn(t) is Fni, then 0CDtμx(t)=fi(t,x(t)),
with Fji∈R,j=1,2,⋯,n are fuzzy sets, x(t)=(x1(t),x2(t),⋯,xn(t))T∈Rn is a state vector, and fi(t,x(t)) is a random function. In this paper, singleton fuzzification, center average defuzzification, and product inference are adopted and a general fractional-order T-S fuzzy system can be rewritten in the form(8)0CDtμxt=∑i=1Nμixtfit,xt, where μi(x(t))=∏j=1nFji(xj(t))/∑i=1N(∏j=1nFji(xj(t))) satisfying ∑i=1Nμi(x(t))=1 and μi(x(t))≥0.
Depending on the above statements, a main difference of Mamdani fuzzy logic systems and T-S fuzzy systems is that the rule consequents are functions for T-S fuzzy system whereas the rule consequents are fuzzy sets for Mamdani fuzzy logic systems. Moreover, the T-S fuzzy logic systems are also universal approximators [31].
3. Adaptive Fuzzy Synchronization Control3.1. Problem Statement
Consider the following fractional-order chaotic system as the master system via T-S type fuzzy systems. The ith rule can be expressed as (i=1,2,⋯,N)
Ri: If x1(t) is F1i and ⋯ and xn(t) is Fni, then 0CDtμx(t)=Aix(t)+b1,
where Ai is a constant matrix, x(t)∈D1⊆Rn is the state vector (D1 is a compact set), b1 is a constant vector, and Fji,j=1,2,⋯,n, are fuzzy sets. Hence, the final output of master system can be rewritten as(9)0CDtμxt=∑i=1NμixtAixt+b1,with μi(x(t))=∏j=1nFji(xj(t))/∑i=1N∏j=1nFji(xj(t)) satisfying μi(x(t))≥0 and ∑i=1Nμi(x(t))=1.
Consider the following fractional-order chaotic system with external disturbances in the equation as the slave system based on T-S fuzzy models. The ith rule can be written in the following form (i=1,⋯,N):
Ri: If y1(t) is F^1i and y2(t) is F^2i and ⋯ and yn(t) is F^ni, then 0CDtμy(t)=Biy(t)+b2+u(t)+di(t,y),
where Bi is a constant matrix, y(t)∈D2⊆Rn is the state vector (D2 is a compact set), b2 is a constant vector, F^ji,j=1,2,⋯,n, are fuzzy sets, u(t)∈R is control input, and di(t,y)∈Rn are unknown external disturbances. Hence, the final output of slave system can be obtained as(10)0CDtμyt=∑i=1NμiytBiyt+b2+ut+dit,y,with μi(y(t))=∏j=1nF^ji(yj(t))/∑i=1N∏j=1nF^ji(yj(t)) satisfying μi(y(t))≥0 and ∑i=1Nμi(y(t))=1.
The control objective of this work is to design a proper adaptive controller u(t) to synchronize the above chaotic systems (9) and (10) with the tracking error signal(11)et=yt-xtasymptotically converging to zero with random accuracy, that is, limt→+∞e(t)=0. The norm adopts Euclid norm in this paper. In addition, all states and parameters in the closed-loop system are bounded. The following assumptions are necessary.
Assumption 5.
The structure of master system (9) and slave system (10) is different. The parameters and the structure of the master system are complete unknown or partial unknown, but the parameters and structure of the slave system are known.
Assumption 6.
The unknown disturbances di(t,y)=(di1(t,y),⋯,din(t,y))T, (i=1,2,⋯,N) satisfying dijt,y≤ρij(y) with ρij(y) being a continuous function, where ρij(y) is the estimated value of the observed value for dijt,y, for all y∈D2.
Remark 7.
It is worth pointing out that Assumptions 5 and 6 are rational. Due to the boundedness of chaos systems, we assume that D1 and D2 are compact sets. Since di(t,y) are unknown external disturbances and may be not continuous, they are assumed to be unknown measurable nonlinear functions. The slave systems and the controller lie on the receiving terminal; hence, the parameters and the structure of the master system may be complete unknown or partial unknown, but the parameters and structure of the slave system are known.
3.2. Control Design
The synchronization error dynamic equation can be obtained from (11) as(12)0CDtμet=0CDtμyt-0CDtμxt=∑i=1NμiytBiyt-∑i=1NμixtAixt+m+ut+∑i=1Nμiytdit,y,with m=b2-b1 being a constant vector.
Based on T-S fuzzy logic system universal approximation theorem, T-S fuzzy systems ρ^ij(y,θij(t)) that have the same rule consequents with the Mamdani type fuzzy logic systems are used to approximate to ρij(y) in the Assumption 6, j∈1,2,⋯,n and i∈1,2,⋯,N, where θij(t) are adjusted parameters in fuzzy systems. Denote ρ^i(y,θi(t))=(ρ^i1(y,θi1(t)).⋯,ρ^in(y,θin(t)))T. Using [48–50], we obtain the ideal parameter as(13)θi∗j=argminθijt∈Rsupt≥0ρ^ijy,θijt-ρijy. Then we obtain the optimal parameter vector as θi∗=(θi∗1,⋯,θi∗n)T. Hence, ρ^ij(y,θi∗j) is the ideal approximator of ρij(y); that is, ρ^i(y,θi∗) is the ideal approximator of ρi(y). The minimum approximation errors and the ideal parameter errors of the fuzzy systems are defined as (j=1,2,⋯,n)(14)εijy=ρijy-ρ^ijy,θi∗j,(15)θ^ijt=θijt-θi∗j. According to [29, 51, 52], the approximation errors εij(y),j=1,2,⋯,n) are assumed to be bounded, that is, εijy≤εi∗j with the εi∗j being constants and ε^i∗j(y) being the estimate value of εi∗j. Thus, from the above analysis, we can obtain the equations ρ^i(y,θi(t))=θiT(t)φi(y) and ρ^i(y,θi∗)=θi∗Tφi(y), where φi(y) is fuzzy base functions. Denoting θ~i(t)=θi(t)-θi∗ and εi(y)=(εi1(y),⋯,εin(y))T, one has(16)ρ^iy,θit-ρiy=ρ^iy,θit-ρ^iy,θi∗+ρ^iy,θi∗-ρiy=ρ^iy,θit-ρ^iy,θi∗-εiy=θ~iTtφiy-εiy.
Remark 8.
As shown in [53], if the rule consequences of T-S fuzzy systems have the same form with the rule consequences of Mamdani type logic systems, then T-S type is equivalent to Mamdani type fuzzy system.
Based on above discussion, the controller is designed with the fuzzy system ρ^i(y,θi(t)) as well as the estimate value ε^i∗j(y) as(17)ut=udt+u~t+u1t=-∑i=1NμiytKet+Biyt+Hisignet+Tρ^iy,θit+m+∑i=1NμixtAixt,where the ith rule of ud(t) and u~(t) can be written as follows, respectively, (i=1,2,⋯,N):
Ri: If y1(t) is F^1i and y2(t) is F^2i and ⋯ and yn(t) is F^ni, then ud(t)=-Ke(t)-Biy(t)-m, with K being an adjusted control gain matrix.
Ri: If x1(t) is F1i and ⋯ and xn(t) is Fni, then u~(t)=Aix(t).
Let us denote u1(t)=-∑i=1Nμi(y(t))[Tρ^i(y,θi(t))+Hisign(e(t))], where T=diag[sign(e1(t)),⋯,sign(en(t))],Hi=diag[ε^i∗1(y),⋯,ε^i∗n(y)].
In order to update parametric estimates, the fractional adaptation laws are designed as(18)0CDtμθ~ijt=αiμiytejtφijy,(19)0CDtμε~i∗jy=βiμiytejt,with αi,βi>0 being adaptation rates which are constant parameters. Taking the control law (17) into (12) and letting K=diag[k1,⋯,kn](kj>0), we have(20)0CDtμet=-Ket+∑i=1Nμiytdit,y-Tρ^iy,θit-Hisignet.Multiplying both sides of (20) by eT(t) and letting ε~i∗j(y)=ε^i∗j(y)-εi∗j, one gets(21)eTt0CDtμet≤-eTtKet-∑i=1Nμiyt∑j=1nejtε^i∗jy+ρ^ijy,θijt-ρijy≤-eTtKet+∑i=1Nμiyt∑j=1nejtεi∗j-ε^i∗jy-θ~ijtφijy=-eTtKet-∑i=1Nμiyt∑j=1nejtε~i∗jy+θ~ijtφijy.
3.3. Stability Analysis
Here, fractional Lyapunov’s theory is used to analyze the stability in closed-loop system. The following Lemmas are proposed to simplify the stability analysis.
Lemma 9 (see [54]).
If μ∈(0,1) and x(t)∈C1, then 0CDtμx(t)Tx(t)≤2x(t)T0CDtμx(t).
Lemma 10.
If 0CDtμx(t)≤0, then one gets x(t)≤x(0); if 0CDtμx(t)≥0, then one gets x(t)≥x(0), with μ∈(0,1) and t∈[0,+∞).
Proof.
We only consider the front part. If 0CDtμx(t)≤0, let(22)ht=-0CDtμxt.Both sides of (22) take Laplace transform and one obtains(23)L0CDtμxt+Hs=0. Using Property 3, one obtains the following:(24)sμXs-sμ-1x0+Hs=0. Further, one gets(25)Xs=x0s-Hssμ,with X(s)=L[x(t)],H(s)=L[h(t)]. Both sides of (25) make Laplace inverse transform and using the fractional integral definition, one obtains(26)xt=x0-0CDt-μht=x0-1Γμ∫0tt-ξμ-1hξdξ. From the above equation, we get x(t)≤x(0),t∈[0,+∞).
Lemma 11.
Let V(t)=(1/2)x(t)Tx(t)+(1/2)y(t)Ty(t) with x(t),y(t)∈Rn be continuous and derivable functions. If there exists a constant h>0 such that(27)0CDtμVt≤-hxtTxt,then x(t) and y(t) are bounded and limt→+∞x(t)=0.
Proof.
According to Lemma 10 and 0CDtμV(t)≤-hx(t)Tx(t)≤0, we obtain V(t)≤V(0). Further, we get the following:(28)xt≤2V0,yt≤2V0. This means that x(t) and y(t) are bounded.
We will proof that x(t) tends to 0 asymptotically below. Both sides of (27) commute with μ-order integral; based on Property 2, one gets(29)Vt-V0≤-h0CDt-μxtTxt.Further, one obtains(30)xtTxt≤2V0-2h0CDt-μxtTxt.Hence, the following can be obtained from (30) with a nonnegative function z(t) as(31)xtTxt+zt=2V0-2h0CDt-μxtTxt.Applying the Laplace transform to formula (31) and according to the Definition 4, we have(32)LxtTxt=2V0sμ-1sμ+2h-Zssμsμ+2h=L2V0Eμ,1-2htμ-LztLt-1Eμ,0-2htμ.Hence, using the Laplace inverse transform to (32), we have(33)xtTxt=2V0Eμ,1-2htμ-zt∗t-1Eμ,0-2htμ, with ∗ being the convolution operator. Since t-1 and Eμ,0(-2htμ) are nonnegative functions, then x(t)Tx(t)≤2V(0)Eμ,1(-2htμ). According to the results in [55], one obtains that x(t) is M-L stability and x(t) tends to 0 asymptotically (namely, limt→∞x(t)=0).
From above discussion, the boundedness of all signals in closed-loop system and the convergence of tracking error based on adaptive fuzzy control scheme via T-S fuzzy logic systems is presented in the following theorem.
Theorem 12.
For the master system (9) and slave system (10) under the known initial conditions, if Assumptions 5 and 6 are satisfied and the adaptive controller is given as (17) with the fractional adaptation laws (18) and (19), then all signals in the closed-loop system are bounded and the tracking error signal tends to zero asymptotically.
Proof.
Define the following Lyapunov function:(34)Vt=12eTtet+∑i=1N12αiθ~iTtθ~it+∑i=1N12βiε~i∗Tyε~i∗y, with θ~i(t)=θi(t)-θi∗ and ε~i∗(y)=ε^i∗(y)-εi∗. Hence, using the Lemma 9, the μ-order derivative of V(t) with respect to time t is obtained as(35)0CDtμVt≤eTt0CDtμet+∑i=1N1αiθ~iTt0CDtμθ~it+∑i=1N1βiε~i∗Ty0CDtμε~i∗ySubstituting (21) into (35), one gets(36)0CDtμVt≤-eTtKet+∑i=1N∑j=1n1αiθ~ijt0CDtμθ~ijt-μiytejtθ~ijtφijy+1βiε~i∗jy0CDtμε~i∗jy-μiytejtε~i∗jy,Taking (18) and (19) into (36), one gets the following inequality:(37)0CDtμV≤-eTtKet≤-λmineTtet, where λmin is the least eigenvalue of the positive definite matrix K. According to Lemma 11 and above discussion, we know that the tracking error signal e(t) tends to 0 asymptotically (that is, limt→∞e(t)=0) and θ~i(t) and ε~i∗(y) are bounded. Further, it means that θi(t) and ε^i∗(y) are bounded. Because of the boundedness of e(t) and x(t), we know that y(t) is bounded. Based on the control design, u(t) is bounded. Therefore, we know that all signals in the closed-loop system are bounded.
4. Simulation Example
In this section, in order to further illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control method designed in previous sections, one example about the synchronization for two different uncertain fractional-order chaotic system is given. The master system of a fractional-order chaotic system via T-S fuzzy model is given as(38)0CDtμxt=∑i=1NμixtAixt+b1,the ith rule of master system is given by
R1: If x1 is F11 and x2 is F21 and x3 is F31, then 0CDt0.8x(t)=A1x(t)+b1,
R2: If x1 is F12 and x2 is F22 and x3 is F32, then 0CDt0.8x(t)=A2x(t)+b1.
The upper system is formulated to the alike form in (9) with(39)A1=-10100400-62.625.040-8,A2=-1010040060.7-24.280-8,b1t=0,0,0T.Figure 1 depicts the simulation results of the master system with the parameters N=2,μ=0.8 with time step h=0.005. Figure 1 shows x1(t), x2(t) and x3(t)∈[-6.07,6.26], [-10,10.6], and [0.2,9.05], respectively, that is, x(t)∈D1=[-6.07,6.26]×[-10,10.6]×[0.2,9.05]. Obviously, Chaos was found in system (38) with μ=0.8.
Master system.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state x1 over the interval [-6.07,6.26] with the membership functions as(40)F11x1t=121-0.095-x1t6.165,F12x1t=121+0.095-x1t6.165.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state x2 over the interval [-10,10.6] with the membership functions as(41)F21x2t=121-0.3-x2t10.3,F22x2t=121-0.3-x2t10.3.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state x3 over the interval [0.2,9.05] with the membership functions as(42)F31x3t=121-4.625-x3t4.425,F32x3t=121-4.625-x3t4.425.
The slave system of a fractional-order chaotic system with unknown disturbances via T-S fuzzy model is given as(43)0CDt0.8yt=∑i=12μiytBiyt+b2+ut+dit,y.The ith rule of slave system is given by
R1: If y1 is F^11 and y2 is F^21 and y3 is F^31, then 0CDt0.8y(t)=B1y(t)+b2+u(t)+d1(t,y),
R2: If y1 is F^12 and y2 is F^22 and y3 is F^32, then 0CDt0.8y(t)=B2y(t)+b2+u(t)+d2(t,y).
The upper system is formulated to the alike form in (10) with(44)B1=-30300022.2-21.52021.52-2.94,B2=-30300022.229.210-29.21-2.94,b2t=0,0,0T.
Figure 2 with u(t)=0 and without the external disturbance is depicted the simulation results of the slave system with the parameters below: N=2,μ=0.8, for time step h=0.005. Moreover, Chaos was found in system (43) with μ=0.8. Figure 2 shows y1(t),y2(t) and y3t∈-29.21,21.52,-35.6,26.5 and [0,53.6], respectively, that is, y(t)∈D2=[-29.21,21.52]×[-35.6,26.5]×[0,53.6].
Slave system.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state y1 over the interval [-29.21,21.52] with the membership functions as follows:(45)F^11y1t=121--3.845-y1t25.365,F^12y1t=121+-3.845-y1t25.365.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state y2 over the interval [-35.6,26.5] with the membership functions as follows:(46)F^21y2t=121--4.55-y2t31.05,F^22y2t=121--4.55-y2t31.05.
Two fuzzy sets are defined for the state y3 over the interval [0,53.6] with the membership functions as follows:(47)F^31y3t=121-26.8-y3t26.8,F^32y3t=121-26.8-y3t26.8.
In the simulation, the initial conditions of master system and slave system are selected as x(0)=(1,1,-2)Tand y(0)=(-2,-3,3)T. The parameters relating the synchronization problem are set to K=E and ρ1(y)=ρ2(y)=(1.5y1,1.5y2,1.5y3)T. Let e(t)=(e1(t),e2(t),e3(t))T.
The controller is designed as(48)ut=u1t,u2t,u3tT=-F^11y1tB1yt-Tρ^y,θt-F^12B2yt-Hsignet-et+F11A1xt+F12A2xt.
Let ρ^(y,θ(t))=(ρ^1,ρ^2,ρ^3)T,H=(ε^∗1(y), ε^∗2(y), and ε^∗3(y))T; then (49)u1t=-e1t-10x1+10x2+30y1-30y2-Tρ^1-ε^∗1y,u2t=-e2t+40x1-10x1x3-22.2y2+y1y3-Tρ^2-ε^∗2y,u3t=-e3t-8x3+4x12-y1y2+2.94y3-Tρ^3-ε^∗3y.
The fractional adaptation laws of θ~j(y) and ε~∗j(y),(j=1,2,3), with α=700,β=0.05 are designed to be (50)0CDtμθ~1t=αe1tφ1y,0CDtμε~∗1y=βe1t,0CDtμθ~2t=αe2tφ2y,0CDtμε~∗2y=βe2t,0CDtμθ~3t=αe3tφ3y,0CDtμε~∗3y=βe3t.
The simulation results of the proposed adaptive control approach are shown in Figure 3, where subgraph (a) denotes the tracking error trajectory and subgraph (b) denotes the control trajectory. Define the initial conditions of the approximation errors as ε^∗1(0)=0,ε^∗2(0)=0,ε^∗3(0)=0. In reducing the computation of the numerical simulation, x(t) and y(t) are replaced by e(t). Four fuzzy sets are defined for the tracking errors e1(t),e2(t),e3(t) over the interval [-3,3] with the Gaussian membership functions, where the first parameters are 1.1 and the second parameters are -3,-1,1,3, respectively. Comparing the conventional control method with the proposed method, we can see that the proposed approach can synchronize two chaotic plants to desired high accuracy and improve the performance as shown in Figure 3.
(a) Synchronization error and (b) controller.
5. Conclusions
In this paper, synchronization of different fractional-order chaotic or hyperchaotic systems with unknown disturbances and parametric uncertainties is addressed with adaptive fuzzy control algorithm based on T-S fuzzy models. The distinctive features of the proposed control approach are that T-S fuzzy logic systems are introduced to approximate the unknown disturbances and to model the unknown controlled systems; both adaptive fuzzy controller and fractional adaptation laws are developed based on combined fractional Lyapunov stability theory and parallel distributed compensation technique. It is shown that the proposed control method can guarantee that all the signals in the closed-loop system remain bounded and the synchronization error converges towards an arbitrary small neighbourhood of the origin asymptotically. A simulation example is used for verifying the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy. Further works would focus on chaos synchronization control of different uncertain fractional-order chaotic systems with time delay and input saturation.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors do not have a direct financial relation with any commercial identity mentioned in their paper that might lead to conflicts of interest for any of the authors.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China under Grant 1808085MF181.
PodlubnyI.1999Academic PressHaoX.WangH.LiuL.CuiY.Positive solutions for a system of nonlinear fractional nonlocal boundary value problems with parameters and p-Laplacian operator20172017118210.1186/s13661-017-0915-52-s2.0-85038125725Zbl06826956ZhangX.LiuL.WuY.CuiY.New Result on the Critical Exponent for Solution of an Ordinary Fractional Differential Problem201720174397646910.1155/2017/3976469MR3713074XuR.ZhangY.Generalized Gronwall fractional summation inequalities and their applications20152015124210.1186/s13660-015-0763-8MR3376162ZhangX.MaoC.LiuL.WuY.Exact iterative solution for an abstract fractional dynamic system model for bioprocess201716120522210.1007/s12346-015-0162-zMR3635502Zbl06855273FengQ.MengF.Traveling wave solutions for fractional partial differential equations arising in mathematical physics by an improved fractional Jacobi elliptic equation method201740103676368610.1002/mma.4254MR3664602Zbl1370.350732-s2.0-85007315065ZhangL.ZhengZ.Lyapunov type inequalities for the Riemann-Liouville fractional differential equations of higher order20172017127010.1186/s13662-017-1329-5MR3695396XuR.MengF.Some new weakly singular integral inequalities and their applications to fractional differential equations2016201617810.1186/s13660-016-1015-2MR3465080WangJ.YuanY.ZhaoS.Fractional factorial split-plot designs with two- and four-level factors containing clear effects201544467168210.1080/03610926.2012.752848MR3315780Zbl1317.62063LiuH.LiS.CaoJ. D.AlsaediA. G.AlsaadiF. E.Adaptive fuzzy prescribed performance controller design for a class of uncertain fractional-order nonlinear systems with external disturbances201721942243010.1016/j.neucom.2016.09.050LiuH.LiS.LiG.WangH.Adaptive Controller Design for a Class of Uncertain Fractional-Order Nonlinear Systems: An Adaptive Fuzzy Approach201711410.1007/s40815-017-0371-5GaoJ.-S.SongG.DengL.-W.Finite-time sliding mode synchronization control of chaotic systems with uncertain parameters20173211491562-s2.0-85015027682Zbl1389.93049LiuH.PanY.LiS.ChenY.Synchronization for fractional-order neural networks with full/under-actuation using fractional-order sliding mode control2017114DasS.YadavV. K.Stability analysis, chaos control of fractional order Vallis and El-Nino systems and their synchronization20174111412410.1109/JAS.2017.7510343MR36066952-s2.0-85010053614PanY.ErM. J.SunT.XuB.YuH.Adaptive fuzzy pd control with stable h tracking guarantee2017237717810.1016/j.neucom.2016.08.091QiaoF.ZhuQ.ZhangB.2013Bingjing Institute of Technology PressWuH.Liouville-type theorem for a nonlinear degenerate parabolic system of inequalities20181031-215516310.1134/S0001434618010170MR3776813Zbl06893881LiuL.SunF.ZhangX.WuY.Bifurcation analysis for a singular differential system with two parameters via to topological degree theory201722131502-s2.0-8500608628010.15388/NA.2017.1.3SunY.LiuL.WuY.The existence and uniqueness of positive monotone solutions for a class of nonlinear Schrödinger equations on infinite domains201732147848610.1016/j.cam.2017.02.036MR3634949Zbl1373.35106XuR.MaX.Some new retarded nonlinear Volterra-Fredholm type integral inequalities with maxima in two variables and their applications20172017, article no. 1872-s2.0-8502771755510.1186/s13660-017-1460-6Zbl1370.26055PengX.ShangY.ZhengX.Lower bounds for the blow-up time to a nonlinear viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping201876667310.1016/j.aml.2017.08.003MR3713497Zbl1378.35046SunY.MengF.Reachable Set Estimation for a Class of Nonlinear Time-Varying Systems201720176587637110.1155/2017/5876371MR3677899FengD.SunM.WangX.A family of conjugate gradient methods for large-scale nonlinear equations201723610.1186/s13660-017-1510-0MR3704950Zbl1371.90101LinX.ZhaoZ.Existence and uniqueness of symmetric positive solutions of 2n-order nonlinear singular boundary value problems201326769269810.1016/j.aml.2013.01.007MR3046380Zbl1315.34036LiuH.LiS.WangH.SunY.Adaptive fuzzy control for a class of unknown fractional-order neural networks subject to input nonlinearities and dead-zones2018454-455304510.1016/j.ins.2018.04.069PanY.YuH.Biomimetic hybrid feedback feedforward neural-network learning control20172861481148710.1109/TNNLS.2016.25275012-s2.0-84962483150PanY.YuH.Composite learning robot control with guaranteed parameter convergence20188939840610.1016/j.automatica.2017.11.032MR3762070Zbl1388.93063SunK.LiY.TongS.Fuzzy Adaptive Output Feedback Optimal Control Design for Strict-Feedback Nonlinear Systems201747133442-s2.0-8500748081310.1109/TSMC.2016.2586193LiY.TongS.Command-filtered-based fuzzy adaptive control design for MIMO-switched nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems201725366868110.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2574913TakagiT.SugenoM.Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control19851511161242-s2.0-0021892282JohansenT. A.ShortenR.Murray-SmithR.On the interpretation and identification of dynamic Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models20008329731310.1109/91.8559182-s2.0-0034205619YingH.General SISO Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems with linear rule consequent are universal approximators1998645825872-s2.0-003220421110.1109/91.728456MatoukA. E.Chaos synchronization of a fractional-order modified van der Pol-Duffing system via new linear control, backstepping control and Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy approaches201621S111612410.1002/cplx.21719MR35506342-s2.0-84949469251Qi-ShuiZ.Jing-FuB.Yong-BinY.Xiao-FengL.Impulsive Control for Fractional-Order Chaotic Systems20082582812281510.1088/0256-307X/25/8/022BouzeribaA.BoulkrouneA.BoudenT.Projective synchronization of two different fractional-order chaotic systems via adaptive fuzzy control2016275134913602-s2.0-8493214525810.1007/s00521-015-1938-4MaoB.LiQ.Chaos synchronization between different fractional order systems with uncertain parameters2017477149152CaoS. G.ReesN. W.FengG.Quadratic stability analysis and design of continuous-time fuzzy control systems19962721932032-s2.0-003008259110.1080/00207729608929204Zbl0850.93460PetrášI.2011Springer Science & Business MediaShenT.XinJ.HuangJ.Time-space fractional stochastic Ginzburg-Landau equation driven by gaussian white noise201836110311310.1080/07362994.2017.1372783MR3750670WangY.LiuL.WuY.Existence and uniqueness of a positive solution to singular fractional differential equations2012201218110.1186/1687-2770-2012-81MR3016330LiM.WangJ.Exploring delayed Mittag-Leffler type matrix functions to study finite time stability of fractional delay differential equations201832425426510.1016/j.amc.2017.11.063MR37436712-s2.0-85039696061ZhangJ.LouZ.JiY.ShaoW.Ground state of Kirchhoff type fractional Schrödinger equations with critical growth20184621578310.1016/j.jmaa.2018.01.060MR3771232Zbl06877111GuoL.LiuL.WuY.Existence of positive solutions for singular fractional differential equations with infinite-point boundary conditions201621563565010.15388/NA.2016.5.5MR3533290Zbl1343.34013WangY.LiuL.WuY.Positive solutions for a class of higher-order singular semipositone fractional differential systems with coupled integral boundary conditions and parameters20142014126810.1186/1687-1847-2014-268MR3359149YuanY.ZhaoS.-l.Mixed two- and eight-level fractional factorial split-plot designs containing clear effects2016324995100410.1007/s10255-016-0620-7MR3552866Zbl1359.62331WuJ.ZhangX.LiuL.WuY.Positive solution of singular fractional differential system with nonlocal boundary conditions20142014132310.1186/1687-1847-2014-323MR3359780ZhangX.LiuL.WuY.Variational structure and multiple solutions for a fractional advection-dispersion equation20146812179418052-s2.0-8491959914010.1016/j.camwa.2014.10.011Zbl1369.35108WangL.1994Englewood CliffsMerazkaL.BoulkrouneA.Adaptive fuzzy state-feedback control for a class of multivariable nonlinear systems20169259312-s2.0-85011277256BoulkrouneA.TadjineM.M'SaadM.FarzaM.Fuzzy adaptive controller for MIMO nonlinear systems with known and unknown control direction201016167978202-s2.0-7424911944610.1016/j.fss.2009.04.011Zbl1217.93086LiuH.PanY.LiS.ChenY.Adaptive Fuzzy Backstepping Control of Fractional-Order Nonlinear Systems20174782209221710.1109/TSMC.2016.2640950LiY.TongS.Adaptive Neural Networks Prescribed Performance Control Design for Switched Interconnected Uncertain Nonlinear Systems20171102-s2.0-85023758626MendelJ.2001Upper Saddle RiverPrentice Hall PTRAguila-CamachoN.Duarte-MermoudM. A.GallegosJ. A.Lyapunov functions for fractional order systems20141992951295710.1016/j.cnsns.2014.01.022MR31828692-s2.0-84897050571LiY.ChenY.PodlubnyI.Mittag-Leffler stability of fractional order nonlinear dynamic systems20094581965196910.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.003MR2879525Zbl1185.930622-s2.0-67649626081