Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 5096741, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5096741

Research Article

IL-1β and IL-6 Are Highly Expressed in RF+IgE+ Systemic Lupus Erythematous Subtype

Yongkang Wu,¹ Bei Cai,¹ Junlong Zhang,¹ Beilei Shen,¹ Zhuochun Huang,¹ Chunyu Tan,² Carla C. Baan,³ and Lanlan Wang¹

¹Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital Affiliated to Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
²Department of Rheumatology, West China Hospital Affiliated to Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
³Department of Internal Medicine, Sector Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Correspondence should be addressed to Lanlan Wang; wangll87@126.com

Received 19 August 2016; Accepted 14 December 2016; Published 12 February 2017

Academic Editor: Nejat K. Egilmez

Copyright © 2017 Yongkang Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Background. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with great heterogeneity in pathogenesis and clinical symptoms. Rheumatoid factor (RF) is one key indicator for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) while immunoglobulin E (IgE) is associated with type I hypersensitivity. To better categorize SLE subtypes, we determined the dominant cytokines based on familial SLE patients. Methods. RF, IgE, and multiple cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1β) were measured in sera of familial SLE patients (), noninherited SLE patients (), and healthy controls (). Results. Three familial SLE patients and 5 noninherited SLE cases are with features of RF+IgE+. These RF+IgE+ SLE patients expressed significantly higher levels of IL-1β and IL-6 than the other SLE patients (). IL-6 correlated with both IgE and IL-1β levels in RF+IgE+ SLE patients (, ; , ), and IgE also correlated with IL-1β (, ). Conclusion. Both IL-1β and IL-6 are highly expressed cytokines in RF+IgE+ SLE subtype which may be related to the pathogenesis of this special SLE subtype and provide accurate treatment strategy by neutralizing IL-1β and IL-6.

1. Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a typical autoimmune disease involving multiple organs [1]. SLE patients with heterogeneous symptoms might have different pathogenic factors [2, 3]. In order to better categorize SLE patients, researchers have grouped patients on genotype, laboratory tests, and clinical characteristics such as the rs329498 (CC+AC versus AA) genotype, anti-dsDNA antibody, and skin rash [4–7]. Subsequently, SLE patients were divided into different subtypes aiming to find common underlying pathogenic factors which might be helpful to unravel the disease process. These parameters are used in the daily clinical practice but are, at the same time, not distinctive enough to adapt and improve treatment for the individual patient. Cytokines play key roles in the pathogenesis of SLE [8]. Compared to healthy controls, the cytokine balance in SLE patients shifted towards a more proinflammatory phenotype [9]. It is recognized at large that both the cytokine profiles and their concentration contribute to the onset and maintenance of autoimmune diseases [10]. Therefore, treatment with agents that block cytokine mediated immune responses is an attractive option. For example, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the disease process is successfully intervened in by anti-TNFα agents that interrupt the inflammatory responses [11]. Also, for the treatment of SLE, it might be attractive to block cytokine mediated responses. However, for optimal results, it is necessary to identify the dominant cytokines involved. For example, Ripley et al. [12] reported that the serum level of IL-6 is related to disease activity of SLE. Unfortunately, this observation was not confirmed by others [13–15]. One of the explanations might be that the substantial heterogeneity among SLE patients influenced the outcomes [3]. Here, we examined whether familial SLE is associated with a specific cytokine or a combination of cytokines.

Here, we reported a SLE family with 3 patients who have been described in detail before [16]. In all patients of this family, both the rheumatoid factor (RF) and immunoglobulin E (IgE) were present (RF+IgE+). RF is an autoantibody directed against the Fc portion of IgG. It is often present in the serum of RA patients. RF and IgG form immune complexes that contribute to RA process [17]. IgE plays an essential role in type I hypersensitivity, which manifests itself in immunity to parasites and various allergic diseases [18].

Until today, only a few studies have been published reporting that RF and IgE have a relationship with the pathogenesis of lupus [19, 20]. The SLE family we studied might represent an inherited SLE subtype. Based on the outcomes of the clinical laboratory tests, the patients were identified with the characteristic disease features. By our previous study results [21] and combination with the relevant literature [22], a total of nine potential pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines were studied, that is, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, interferon induced protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1β (MIP-1β). We hypothesize that cytokines are differently expressed in inherited familial SLE subtype patients.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

This study was conducted under the approval of the Institutional Review Board, West China Hospital affiliated to Sichuan University, China. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.

2.2. Patients and Healthy Controls

Serum samples were obtained from a SLE family with 3 patients, noninherited SLE patients (), and healthy controls (). Of the SLE family, 3 daughters suffered from SLE. The first registered patient of this family was a 36-year-old female. Her younger sister (32 years old) and elder sister (38 years old) were also diagnosed with SLE. Those patients were diagnosed at the age of 27. Another proband’s elder sister with clinical manifestations of SLE died (pedigree diagram is shown in Figure 1). The 108 noninherited SLE patients and 80 healthy controls were enrolled from in-patient and physical examination volunteers of the West China Hospital affiliated to Sichuan University. All SLE patients were diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (1997) [23]. An overview of the patient cohort is given in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Pedigree diagram of the SLE family. Pedigree diagram of the SLE family with 3 SLE sisters diagnosed at the age of 27; the 3 patients’ mother was RF positive and was suspected to have an autoimmune disease (AID). The deceased elder sister was diagnosed with clinical signs of SLE.

Figure 2: SLE patients were divided into different subgroups. All the SLE patients included 3 cases from a family with RF+IgE+; the other patients were divided into 4 subgroups based on the results combination of RF and IgE. A total of 8 SLE patients with RF+IgE+ were investigated for high expression of cytokines. Note. RF+ means that RF concentration is higher than the upper-limit level of our lab reference range (20 IU/mL). IgE+ means that IgE concentration is higher than the upper-limit level of our lab reference range (150 IU/mL).

2.3. Detection of RF

RF was measured by rate nephelometry method (IMMAGE800, Beckman & Coulter Company, USA).

2.4. Detection of IgE

IgE was measured by the microparticle chemiluminescence method (DXI800, Beckman & Coulter Company, USA).

2.5. Detection of Cytokines

Measurement of the cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, and MIP-1β was performed by Bio-Plex suspension chip method according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Plex 200, Bio-Rad company, USA).

2.6. Statistics

The distribution of cytokines data was handled by median and quartile and compared by Mann–Whitney U test by SPSS 21.0. Pearson test was used for correlation coefficient analysis by GraphPad Prism 5.0. Probability () value less than 0.05 was considered to be significantly different.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics of Subjects

There were no significant differences in the age or gender distribution among patients in all SLE subgroups and healthy controls () (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographics of the subjects.

Groups
Number of patients
Male/female
Age range
Mean age
()

SLE patients
111
0/111
14–68

    In the family
3
0/3
32–38
32, 36,

    Noninherited RF+IgE+
5
0/5
16–40

    Noninherited RF+IgE−
25
0/25
14–59

    Noninherited RF−IgE+
18
0/18
16–55

    Noninherited RF−IgE−
60
0/60
14–68

Healthy controls
80
0/80
14–68

s of three SLE patients in the family were shown.

Note. RF+ means that RF concentration is higher than the upper-limit level of our lab reference range (20 IU/mL). IgE+ means that IgE concentration is higher than the upper-limit level of our lab reference range (150 IU/mL).

3.2. Features of the SLE Family

Immunoglobulin (Ig), complement, and autoantibodies in sera were detected for all SLE family members. Three SLE patients in the family showed simultaneous expression of RF and IgE; one case with suspected autoimmune disease (AID) was manifested with high RF and normal IgE (data shown in Table 2).

Table 2: Some laboratory data of SLE family cases enrolled in this study.

Item
Reference range
Sample number of Figure 1

1
2
3
4

Diagnosis
NA
Suspected AID case
SLE
SLE
SLE

RF (IU/mL)
<20.00
43.80
24.60
33.60
44.60

IgE (IU/mL)
0.10～150.00
141.33
278.65
1440.00
1002.87

Note. AID: autoimmune disease; NA: not applicable; RF: rheumatoid factor; IgE: immunoglobulin E.

3.3. Analysis of Cytokines Production by SLE Patients and Healthy Controls

In sera of all SLE patients and healthy controls, cytokines levels were determined (Table 3). The expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, IP-10, and MCP-1 except MIP-1β were significantly higher in SLE patients than in sera from healthy controls ().

Table 3: Serum cytokine levels of SLE patients and healthy controls.

Cytokines
SLE patients ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
Healthy controls ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
value

IL-1β
3.86 (2.52–6.31)
1.17 (0.65–1.74)
0.000

IL-6
29.71 (19.58–50.59)
16.98 (14.24–20.74)
0.000

IL-8
101.19 (40.00–331.36)
32.12 (23.70–52.27)
0.000

IL-10
5.67 (3.95–7.66)
0.66 (0.55–3.72)
0.000

IL-17
107.54 (75.52–165.86)
90.29 (69.56–116.04)
0.003

IFN-γ
552.14 (444.69–629.23)
326.54 (250.89–389.31)
0.000

IP-10
7121.35 (1703.35–68843.27)
931.04 (665.78–1457.07)
0.000

MCP-1
73.39 (36.37–106.18)
57.72 (46.04–78.83)
0.021

MIP-1β
165.24 (65.91–530.52)
120.245 (90.69–181.78)
0.065

Note. The results were not normally distributed and therefore nonparametric statistics and median and interquartile range were used.

Next, the concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-γ, IP-10, and MCP-1 were compared between the SLE patients with IgE+ and those with IgE− from noninherited SLE patients (Table 4). IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 were significantly higher in IgE+ SLE patients than in IgE− patients (). The cytokine levels and profiles were also compared between the SLE patients with RF+ and those with RF− from noninherited SLE patients (Table 5). IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10 were significantly higher in SLE patients with RF+ than in those with RF− (). Combining the results of Tables 4 and 5, we found that both IL-1β and IL-6 are significantly higher in SLE patients IgE+ or those with RF+. So, we investigated the IL-1β and IL-6 level of SLE patients with RF+IgE+. These levels were not significantly different from the 5 patients who also expressed RF+IgE+ of the noninherited group and the 3 patients of familial SLE (Table 6, ). So, those 8 SLE patients with RF+IgE+ united as a big group to compare the SLE patients group without RF+IgE+. Both IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly higher expressed in patients with RF+IgE+ than in those without RF+IgE+ (Table 7, ).

Table 4: Serum cytokine levels of SLE patients with IgE+ and with IgE−.

Cytokines
SLE patients with IgE+ ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
SLE patients with IgE− ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
value

IL-1β
5.16 (3.55–15.29)
3.39 (2.22–4.92)
0.014

IL-6
48.34 (26.19–105.07)
26.19 (17.55–43.87)
0.049

IL-8
246.90 (101.19–1427.36)
73.98 (35.64–209.75)
0.005

IL-10
6.08 (5.46–8.43)
5.25 (3.61–7.64)
0.179

IL-17
130.29 (99.50–212.33)
102.83 (63.53–144.20)
0.347

IFN-γ
567.53 (536.75–660.14)
544.44 (395.04–613.79)
0.615

IP-10
8233.28 (3018.89–80232.70)
5783.33 (1699.61–66032.48)
0.347

MCP-1
92.83 (50.33–117.20)
65.62 (32.56–105.98)
0.019

Table 5: Serum cytokine levels of SLE patients with RF+ and with RF−.

Cytokines
SLE patients with RF+ ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
SLE patients with RF− ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
value

IL-1β
4.64 (3.78–6.62)
3.34 (2.22–5.16)
0.015

IL-6
42.76 (24.43–59.88)
26.19 (17.70–40.70)
0.026

IL-8
144.38 (70.19–357.69)
73.63 (35.05–309.08)
0.115

IL-10
6.48 (4.83–8.62)
5.04 (3.37–7.13)
0.024

IL-17
116.39 (89.16–168.86)
104.51 (63.60–161.21)
0.223

IFN-γ
567.53 (521.38–633.10)
536.75 (404.58–623.44)
0.093

IP-10
7523.57 (1750.17–86424.87)
7423.97 (1701.48–64627.08)
0.714

MCP-1
79.75 (50.74–102.34)
67.91 (31.49–110.04)
0.297

Table 6: Serum cytokine levels of SLE patients with RF+IgE+ in family and in noninherited group.

Cytokines
SLE patients with RF+IgE+ in family ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
SLE patients with RF+IgE+ from noninherited group ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
value

IL-1β
31.40; 4.63;
5.16 (4.07–12.14)
0.571

IL-6
362.02; 44.88;
52.65 (35.46–103.62)
0.393

all data.

Table 7: Serum cytokine levels of all SLE patients with RF+IgE+ and without RF+IgE+.

Cytokines
SLE patients with RF+IgE+ ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
Other SLE patients without RF+IgE+ ()
Median (25%–75%) (pg/mL)
value

IL-1β
6.51 (4.36–13.71)
3.55 (2.42–5.73)
0.014

IL-6
64.29 (46.21–134.27)
28.54 (18.81–47.32)
0.007

IL-8
289.13 (83.86–1288.88)
86.84 (38.4–282.23)
0.058

IL-10
5.77 (3.95–8.24)
5.67 (3.95–7.66)
0.837

IL-17
103.85 (89.18–155.74)
109.56 (67.38–168.86)
0.737

IFN-γ
559.84 (507.94–640.82)
552.14 (437.04–621.51)
0.444

IP-10
5268.74 (937.39–60288.90)
7249.37 (1765.77–68843.27)
0.545

MCP-1
93.91 (57.13–174.04)
70.48 (35.12–106.18)
0.202

3.4. Association between IL-1β and IL-6 in RF+IgE+ SLE Patients

Our study showed an association between IgE and IL-6 in sera of SLE patients with RF+IgE+ (, , Figure 3); the IgE also correlated with IL-1β (, , Figure 4); the IL-6 level correlated with IL-1β levels (, , Figure 5). No correlation was found for RF with IL-1β (, ) and RF with IL-6 (, ).

Figure 3: Association between IL-6 and IgE for RF+IgE+ SLE patients.

Figure 4: Association between IL-1β and IgE for RF+IgE+ SLE patients.

Figure 5: Association between IL-6 and IL-1β for RF+IgE+ SLE patients.

4. Discussion

SLE has a strong heritable component up to 66% [24], and the rate of concordance in monozygotic twins is also high between 20% and 40%, while between dizygotic twins or siblings this is relatively low and about 2% to 5% [25]. However, the sibling recurrence risk ratio in SLE patients is 29-fold higher than in the general population [24]. That indicates the importance of susceptibility inheritance. Some genes such as C1q, C1r, and C1s are in very strong linkage with SLE [26]. Here, we reported three SLE patients in one family who were diagnosed with SLE at nearly the same age. This clinical observation suggests the involvement of a heritable component and one or several genes play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of SLE in this family. These patients from this family might represent a unique SLE subtype which might have an exclusive phenotype.

RF is a diagnostic criterion of RA [27], while in only 30% of the SLE patients this factor can be detected [28, 29]. Previously, studies showed that different autoimmune diseases can share the same pathogenic pathways such as gene or laboratory tests [30]. Also, RF also can be found in lupus families [19]. The family of four members including 3 SLE patients described in this paper were tested as RF positive. Therefore, we postulate that RF positive patients may represent a new SLE subtype in which RF plays a role in the pathogenesis of SLE.

High IgE level is not very often found in blood of SLE patients. Only 30% of the patients tested positive for this immunoglobulin [31]. All of the SLE patients in this family tested positive for IgE. Studies have reported that IgE leads to abnormal immune reaction which is followed by IgE production by activated B cells [32–34]. Also, activated T cells that produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10 provide help to B cells, which differentiate into IgE secreting plasma cells [33]. The high IgE level in a subset of SLE patients showed the involvement of the adaptive immune system in the onset and/or maintenance of this severe disease [35]. Here, some studies confirm the involvement of IgE in pathogenic mechanisms in autoimmune diseases such as lupus [20, 36]. Also, as this was found in a family with several SLE patients, it should be associated with a hereditary factor in the pathogenesis of SLE [37].

Simultaneous expression of RF+IgE+ can represent a subtype of SLE based on the heredity. In China, there are only a few families with several children, which makes this family a special group of patients to study and to discover disease related cytokine profiles. At the same time, we are aware of the limitations of our study as only 3 SLE patients in this family were analyzed which may limit the impact of our findings. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcomes of our studies provide clues for future directions of research and patient care.

Outcomes of those studies will be used to set up a diagnostic model comprising two combined potential biomarkers (RF+IgE+) to better categorize SLE patients which will also help to understand the SLE heterogeneity. From the viewpoint of heredity, if one gene mutation can cause one subtype of SLE, compared with over 100 SLE genetic loci [2], then 4.6% is high enough for RF+IgE+ SLE subtype incidence rate. We measured nine cytokines for all SLE patients. Our study showed that high levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 are present in the circulation of this unique RF+IgE+ SLE subtype. A recent study [38] reported that IL-1β can enhance the proliferation and differentiation of B cells to autoantibody producing plasma cells and mediate B cell apoptosis [39]. The latter is of significance as increased nuclear apoptosis enables more autoantigens exposure, leading to the production of autoantibodies to SLE [40]. Also, IL-6 is key for the activation and regulation of B cell activity [41, 42]. The study of lupus mice demonstrated that IL-6 is involved in the pathogenesis disease [43].

Here, we for the first time report that RF+IgE+ SLE patients have high serum levels of IL-1β and IL-6. Umare V reported that both cytokines are expressed with a high level in some SLE patients but with no results of RF and IgE [44]. These findings suggest that IL-1β and IL-6 may be important cytokines in this subgroup of inherited and noninherited SLE patients with RF+IgE+. In our study, no correlation was found between IL-1β and IL-6 with RF+. The reason may be that IL-1β and IL-6 can help to produce Ig, but RF that we detected was of IgM type and it shared a small part of IgM [45]. We are interested in the association with the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. The correlation between IL-1β and IL-6 in our study indicated that these cytokines may collaborate in the pathogenesis of RF+IgE+ SLE subtype. Wang et al. and Apostolidis et al. also reported that both cytokines play a key role in SLE [46, 47]. Therefore, the treatment strategy of targeting the IL-1β and IL-6 pathway is an interesting option as these compounds might dampen disease progression.

IL-1β is involved in inflammatory responses and elevated levels have been found in some autoimmune diseases. Therefore, therapeutics that block IL-1β and/or its biological functions have been approved to treat diseases such as RA, neonatal onset multisystem inflammatory diseases, and active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis [48]. Recently, a new humanized antibody that binds IL-1β was tested with promising results which can be used in the therapeutic arsenal [49]. In addition, Prud’homme et al. proposed that an IL-1 receptor antagonist could also protect against the development of lupus by the inhibition of IL-1 effects [50]. For IL-6, Gijbels et al. also used neutralizing antibodies to treat experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis associated with high IL-6 levels [51]. Sirukumab monoclonal antibody with high affinity for IL-6 showed potential for use in the treatment of SLE. The Phase I trial showed that sirukumab is safe and well tolerated [52]. The tocilizumab is another monoantibody directed against IL-6 receptor and blocks the downstream signal pathway by which it modulates the function of IL-6R expressing T and B cells. This agent was successfully administrated to patients with lupus-associated serositis [53], massive pericarditis, and glomerulonephritis [52, 54]. In autoimmunity, combination therapy with anti-IL-1β and anti-IL-6 antibody has not been tested so far. This might be a novel approach to better cure the RF+IgE+ SLE subtype patients with both cytokines highly expressed and benefit from such a strategy. This strategy was tried by Wang et al. [46] for SLE patients with high IL-1β and IL-6 cerebrospinal fluid levels who were found to have severe demyelinating diseases.

It is evident that confirmation in a different cohort of RF+IgE+ SLE patients is needed as our findings and conclusions are based on a small cohort of patients.

Competing Interests

The authors report that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Yongkang Wu and Beilei Shen finished the first draft and were primarily responsible for scientific analysis of the data. Bei Cai and Zhuochun Huang contributed significantly to the writing of the paper. Junlong Zhang and Chunyu Tan performed the sample preparation and the lab assays described. Carla C. Baan contributed significantly to the writing of the paper. Lanlan Wang contributed to the conception of the study and the scientific analysis. All authors reviewed and approved the first submission and the revised paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fund of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province, Grant no. 2016JY0035.

References

E. Beccastrini, M. M. D'Elios, G. Emmi et al., “Systemic lupus erythematosus: immunopathogenesis and novel therapeutic targets,” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 585–596, 2013.

A. Kaul, C. Gordon, M. K. Crow et al., “Systemic lupus erythematosus,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 2, Article ID 16039, 2016.

T. N. Marion and A. E. Postlethwaite, “Chance, genetics, and the heterogeneity of disease and pathogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Seminars in Immunopathology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 495–517, 2014.

K. Perkins, R. W. Hoffman, and N. Bezruczko, “A Rasch analysis for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus and mixed connective tissue disease,” Journal of Applied Measurement, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 136–150, 2008.

J. De Azevêdo Silva, C. Addobbati, P. Sandrin-Garcia, and S. Crovella, “Systemic lupus erythematosus: old and new susceptibility genes versus clinical manifestations,” Current Genomics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 52–65, 2014.

J. Ni, J. Liu, R.-X. Leng, H.-F. Pan, and D.-Q. Ye, “Genetic polymorphism (rs329498) in the Pellino-1 gene as possible predisposal factor for systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese population,” Immunological Investigations, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 181–190, 2016.

J. Liu, J. Liu, J. Ni, R. X. Leng, H. F. Pan, and D. Q. Ye, “Association of UBASH3A gene polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese population,” Gene, vol. 565, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 2015.

P. López, J. Rodríguez-Carrio, and A. Suárez, “Antimalarial drugs inhibit IFNα-enhanced TNFα and STAT4 expression in monocytes: implication for systemic lupus erythematosus,” Cytokine, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2014.

M. A. B. Lozovoy, A. N. C. Simão, H. K. Morimoto et al., “Hypertension is associated with serologically active disease in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: role of increased Th1/Th2 ratio and oxidative stress,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 59–62, 2014.

D. Quandt, K. Rothe, R. Scholz, C. W. Baerwald, and U. Wagner, “Peripheral CD4CD8 double positive t cells with a distinct helper cytokine profile are increased in rheumatoid arthritis,” PLOS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e93293, 2014.

C. Zamora-Atenza, C. Diaz-Torne, C. Geli et al., “Adalimumab regulates intracellular TNFα production in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, article no. R153, 2014.

B. J. M. Ripley, B. Goncalves, D. A. Isenberg, D. S. Latchman, and A. Rahman, “Raised levels of interleukin 6 in systemic lupus erythematosus correlate with anaemia,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 849–853, 2005.

G. G. Song, S. J. Choi, J. D. Ji, and Y. H. Lee, “Association between interleukin-18 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 2581–2587, 2013.

Y. H. Lee, H. S. Lee, S. J. Choi, J. D. Ji, and G. G. Song, “The association between interleukin-6 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis,” Lupus, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2012.

T. Wais, W. Fierz, T. Stoll, and P. M. Villiger, “Subclinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: immunoinflammatory markers do not normalize in clinical remission,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 2133–2139, 2003.

Y. Wu, Z. Huang, Y. Shi et al., “Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) risk factors: novel proteins detected from familial SLE using proteomics,” Laboratory Medicine, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 408–411, 2009.

J. Sokolove, D. S. Johnson, L. J. Lahey et al., “Rheumatoid factor as a potentiator of anti-citrullinated protein antibody-mediated inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 813–821, 2014.

H. J. Gould, B. J. Sutton, A. J. Beavil et al., “The biology of IgE and the basis of allergic disease,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 21, pp. 579–628, 2003.

P. S. Ramos, J. A. Kelly, C. Gray-McGuire et al., “Familial aggregation and linkage analysis of autoantibody traits in pedigrees multiplex for systemic lupus erythematosus,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 417–432, 2006.

M. A. Sanjuan, D. Sagar, and R. Kolbeck, “Role of IgE in autoimmunity,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 1651–1661, 2016.

H. Xue, L. Gao, Y. Wu et al., “The IL-16 gene polymorphisms and the risk of the systemic lupus erythematosus,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 403, no. 1-2, pp. 223–225, 2009.

G. M. Ferri, A. Gigante, F. Ferri et al., “Urine chemokines: biomarkers of human lupus nephritis?” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 171–178, 2007.

L. M. Amezcua-Guerra, V. Higuera-Ortiz, U. Arteaga-García, S. Gallegos-Nava, and C. Hübbe-Tena, “Performance of the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics and the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life scenario,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 437–441, 2015.

D. Alarcón-Segovia, M. E. Alarcón-Riquelme, M. H. Cardiel et al., “Familial aggregation of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and other autoimmune diseases in 1,177 lupus patients from the GLADEL cohort,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1138–1147, 2005.

D. Deapen, A. Escalante, L. Weinrib et al., “A revised estimate of twin concordance in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 1992.

K. L. Moser, J. A. Kelly, C. J. Lessard, and J. B. Harley, “Recent insights into the genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Genes and Immunity, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 373–379, 2009.

Y. Kaneko, M. Kuwana, H. Kameda, and T. Takeuchi, “Sensitivity and specificity of 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria,” Rheumatology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1268–1274, 2011.

C. Popescu, S. Zofota, V. Bojinca, and R. Ionescu, “The significance of rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 51, no. 3-4, pp. 179–187, 2013.

T. L. Skare, M. B. Silva, A. P. Holler, and P. A. Chavez, “Protective role of rheumatoid factor in lupus nephritis,” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 5, article 895, 2009.

X.-J. Zhou, S. K. Nath, Y.-Y. Qi et al., “Brief report: identification of MTMR3 as a novel susceptibility gene for lupus nephritis in northern han chinese by shared-gene analysis with IgA nephropathy,” Arthritis and Rheumatology, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2842–2848, 2014.

A. M. Atta, C. P. Sousa, E. M. Carvalho, and M. L. B. Sousa-Atta, “Immunoglobulin E and systemic lupus erythematosus,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1497–1501, 2004.

B. Dema, C. Pellefigues, S. Hasni et al., “Autoreactive IgE is prevalent in systemic lupus erythematosus and is associated with increased disease activity and nephritis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e90424, 2014.

A. M. Atta, M. B. Santiago, F. G. Guerra, M. M. Pereira, and M. L. B. S. Atta, “Autoimmune response of IgE antibodies to cellular self-antigens in systemic lupus erythematosus,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 401–406, 2010.

B. L. Liphaus and M. H. B. Kiss, “The role of apoptosis proteins and complement components in the etiopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Clinics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 327–333, 2010.

R. S. Geha, “Regulation of IgE synthesis in humans,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 143–150, 1992.

E. Sin, P. Anand, and M. Frieri, “A link: allergic rhinitis, Asthma & Systemic Lupus Erythematosus,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 487–491, 2016.

K. Sasai, S. Furukawa, H. Hashimoto, and K. Yabuta, “Increased levels of serum IgE in children of mothers with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Allergy, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370–373, 1995.

J.-Q. Ni, Q. Ouyang, L. Lin et al., “Role of toll-like receptor 4 on lupus lung injury and atherosclerosis in LPS-challenge ApoE−/− mice,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 476856, 12 pages, 2013.

Y. Feng, J. Wu, X. Feng et al., “Timing of apoptosis onset depends on cell cycle progression in peripheral blood lymphocytes and lymphocytic leukemia cells,” Oncology Reports, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1437–1444, 2007.

H. Trébéden-Nègre, B. Weill, C. Fournier, and F. Batteux, “B cell apoptosis accelerates the onset of murine lupus,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1603–1612, 2003.

D. P. Harris, L. Haynes, P. C. Sayles et al., “Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 475–482, 2000.

C. Avramescu, V. Biciusca, T. Daianu et al., “Cytokine panel and histopathological aspects in the systemic lupus erythematosus,” Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 633–640, 2010.

L. S. Davis, J. Hutcheson, and C. Mohan, “The role of cytokines in the pathogenesis and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 781–789, 2011.

V. Umare, V. Pradhan, M. Nadkar et al., “Effect of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF, and IL-1 β) on clinical manifestations in indian SLE patients,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 385297, 8 pages, 2014.

L. Berntson, E. Nordal, A. Fasth et al., “Anti-type II collagen antibodies, anti-CCP, IgA RF and IgM RF are associated with joint damage, assessed eight years after onset of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA),” Pediatric Rheumatology Online Journal, vol. 12, article 22, 2014.

J.-B. Wang, H. Li, L.-L. Wang, H.-D. Liang, L. Zhao, and J. Dong, “Role of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and IFN-γ in pathogenesis of central nervous system neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematous,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 16658–16663, 2015.

S. A. Apostolidis, L. A. Lieberman, K. Kis-Toth, J. C. Crispín, and G. C. Tsokos, “The dysregulation of cytokine networks in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 769–779, 2011.

C. M. Fremond, D. Togbe, E. Doz et al., “IL-1 receptor-mediated signal is an essential component of MyD88-dependent innate response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 1178–1189, 2007.

A. X. H. Goh, S. Bertin-Maghit, S. P. Yeo et al., “A novel human anti-interleukin-1β neutralizing monoclonal antibody showing in vivo efficacy,” mAbs, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 765–773, 2014.

G. J. Prud'Homme, B. R. Lawson, and A. N. Theofilopoulos, “Anticytokine gene therapy of autoimmune diseases,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 359–373, 2001.

K. Gijbels, S. Brocke, J. S. Abrams, and L. Steinman, “Administration of neutralizing antibodies to interleukin-6 (IL-6) reduces experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and is associated with elevated levels of IL-6 bioactivity in central nervous system and circulation,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 795–805, 1995.

U. Thanarajasingam and T. B. Niewold, “Sirukumab: a novel therapy for lupus nephritis?” Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1449–1455, 2014.

V. Ocampo, D. Haaland, K. Legault, S. Mittoo, and E. Aitken, “Successful treatment of recurrent pleural and pericardial effusions with tocilizumab in a patient with systemic lupus erythematous,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2016, 2016.

A. Iwai, T. Naniwa, S. Tamechika, and S. Maeda, “Short-term add-on tocilizumab and intravenous cyclophosphamide exhibited a remission-inducing effect in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus with refractory multiorgan involvements including massive pericarditis and glomerulonephritis,” Modern Rheumatology, pp. 1–4, 2014.