Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 8439813, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8439813

Review Article

Meta-Analysis of the Changes of Peripheral Blood T Cell Subsets in Patients with Brucellosis

Rongjiong Zheng,¹ Songsong Xie,¹ Shaniya Niyazi,¹ Xiaobo Lu,¹ Lihua Sun,¹ Yan Zhou,¹ Yuexin Zhang,¹ and Kai Wang²

¹Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830054, China
²Department of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830011, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yuexin Zhang; zhangyx3103@163.com and Kai Wang; wangkaimath@sina.com

Received 5 February 2018; Accepted 24 April 2018; Published 17 May 2018

Academic Editor: Jinling Chen

Copyright © 2018 Rongjiong Zheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Brucellosis is one of the most prevalent zoonotic diseases in the world, but its pathogenesis is not very clear. At present, it is thought that it may be related to the immunity of T cells. The conclusions of related studies are inconsistent, and its clinical significance is not explicit. We searched published articles in electronic databases up to December 2017 identified as relating to the clinical features of human brucellosis in China. Only eight studies had sufficient quality for data extraction. Meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased proportion of CD4+ T cells in human brucellosis patients compared to healthy subject individuals. The frequency of CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in human brucellosis patients than that in the healthy control group. The pooled analysis presented a significant decrease of the CD4+/CD8+ ratio in human brucellosis patients compared to healthy subjects. There is immunologic dysfunction of T lymphocyte in patients with human brucellosis, the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells might be the important factors affecting the progress of brucellosis.

1. Introduction

Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic infections globally [1], which is a highly contagious zoonosis. Human brucellosis is transmitted to humans by direct/indirect contact with infected animals or through the consumption of raw meat and dairy products [2, 3]. Patients may have the symptoms of fever, sweating, fatigue, and osteoarthritis and even more serious conditions in different organ systems [4–6]. Brucellosis is often misdiagnosed as malaria, typhoid fever, rheumatic fever, osteoarthritis, and other diseases. Brucella has brought great harm to public health, food safety, and so on. The specific pathogenesis of brucellosis infection is not very clear. It is difficult to make a diagnosis by epidemiological and clinical symptoms. Human brucellosis is prone to multiple system complications, and once the brucellosis progresses to chronic phase, it will be difficult to cure [7]. Therefore, the pathogenesis of brucellosis is a hot research issue, and it is also believed that brucella infection is related to both innate immunity and adaptive immunity [8].

Studies have shown that the changes of T lymphocyte are crucial to the interpretation of the clinicopathological features of brucellosis in the process of chronic infection and recurrence [9, 10]. There are three mechanisms of acquired immunity in brucella infection: (1) the antimicrobial effect of macrophage induced by interferon-gamma secreted by CD4+, CD8+, γ, and β T lymphocyte [11]; (2) the hosts eliminate the macrophages infected by brucella through the cytotoxic effect of CD8+, γ, and β T lymphocytes [12]; and (3) the modulating effect of the antibody can enhance the phagocytosis of macrophages [13]. Activated CD8+ T lymphocytes and CD4+ Th1 type immune responses play an important role in the scavenging of intracellular pathogens. Treg has the function of inhibiting the proliferation of T lymphocyte and eliminating the pathogen. The changes in the number and function of Treg will inhibit the immune function of the host, which may be one of the mechanisms that leads brucella infection progresses into chronicity [14]. However, most of the immunology-related studies of the interaction between the host and brucella are mostly derived from domesticated ruminants or mice. The immune mechanism of brucella infection in diverse hosts is different.

There are few reports about the changes of peripheral blood T cell subsets in patients with brucellosis, and the results reported are not consistent [15–22]. It is difficult to draw a conclusion because of the deviations in experiments, population difference, and single or small sample study. In order to reduce the differences and bias among the various research institutes, meta-analysis method was used to analyze the previous research results to investigate the changes in the frequency of T cell subsets in peripheral blood of patients and provide the direction for further exploration of the mechanism of the immune pathogenesis of brucellosis.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify articles relating to the changes of peripheral blood T cell subsets in patients with brucellosis. With the assistance of a professional medical librarian, we electronically searched for the literature in Wanfang Data, PubMed, and EMbase with MESH and keyword subject headings “brucellosis,” “Brucella,” “Brucel,” and “malta fever,” and “CD3,” “CD4,” “CD8,” “Th17,” “Th1,” “Th2,” “Treg,” and “Regulatory T Cells” for entries published from databases’ inception before December 2017. We did not restrict the types of studies and publication languages. Duplicate entries were identified by two investigators screening the title and abstract of the article, the author, the year of publication, and the volume, issue, and page numbers of the source, and reviewed potentially all relevant articles.

2.2. Selection Criteria

We systematically and inclusively reviewed articles by two investigators. The reviewers selected articles firstly by title and abstract, next by full text, and lastly by analyzing eligible studies in detail until demonstrated 100% agreement in articles are included and excluded by two investigators.

Studies with the following criteria were excluded such as (i) articles related to nonhuman brucellosis, (ii) reported data that overlapped with already included articles, (iii) articles could not provide original data of the patients, (iv) and articles addressing topics not related to the changes of peripheral blood T cell subsets in patients with Brucellosis.

Studies with the following criteria were included such as (i) designed as a case-control study, (ii) the literatures assessed the changes in peripheral blood T cell subsets in patients with brucellosis, and (iii) provided sufficient data, including mean and standard deviation of T cell from case and control to calculate the efficient size.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data was extracted by two reviewers independently including date of the first author’s name, publication year, study design, study location, patient, the number of male and female patients, detection technology, and treatment status methods of diagnosis, and results of each study were recorded. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). The results of data extraction must reach an agreement and consensus among the reviewers. Due to the inconsistency of the standard of the staging of disease in the literature included, the total mean and total standard deviation of the case group in the literature consist of acute and chronic staging are combined with the following formulas:

where , , and denote the number of samples, the mean, and the standard deviation of the ith group, respectively.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes. The mean ± SD was extracted and calculated in all included publications. Cochran’s Q test and Higgin’s I² statistics were simultaneously adopted for the test of heterogeneity of combined MDs. A random effects model was adopted to aggregate the pooled MD when significant heterogeneity existed ( and/or ); on the contrary, a fixed effects model was employed ( and/or ). Publication bias was detected by Egger’s regression asymmetry test when the number of included trials ≥ 7. Sensitivity analyses were performed by omitting each study to identify the stability of combined results.

3. Results

3.1. Systematic Review

Literature searches yielded 5118 potential articles, leaving 8 publications that met inclusion and exclusion criteria for data extraction and final analyses. Eight studies representing 396 patients with human brucellosis and 212 cases of healthy control were finally included in the meta-analysis. All 8 articles included in the analysis were case-control studies. Figure 1 illustrates the detailed search process.

Figure 1: Procedure of the selection process.

In the 8 studies we selected, there are 6 articles in English and 2 in Chinese. Seven studies provided data about CD3+ T cells in peripheral blood [15, 17–22], 8 studies are related to CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood [17–22], 4 studies are related to the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ in peripheral blood [15, 16, 19, 20], and 3 studies are related to Th1 cells and Th2 cell [16, 17, 22]. Only 2 studies are related to Treg cells in peripheral blood. The basic characteristics of the literature and patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Year
Author(s)
Region
Treatment status
Study design
Number
Sex (M/F)
NOS scale

Patient
Control
Patient
Control

2015
Gao et al. [15]
China
No report
Case-control design
142
45
89/53
27/18
7

2016
Gu et al. [16]
China
No report
Case-control design
50
50
42/8
38/12
7

2010
Manuel et al. [17]
Spain
All patients were treated
Case-control and cohort design
24
24
17/7
18/6
8

2006
Panagiotis et al. [18]
Greece
No report
Case-control design
35
15
28/7
11/4
7

2005
Celik et al. [19]
Turkey
All patients were treated
Case-control and cohort design
43
20
19/24
11/9
8

1996
Pourfathollah et al. [20]
Iran
No report
Case-control design
56
26
—
15/11
6

1996
Zapata et al. [21]
Spain
All patients were treated
Case-control and cohort design
21
21
19/2
—
6

2005
Akbulut et al. [22]
Turkey
No report
Case-control design
25
11
16/9
7/4
7

3.2. Changes of Peripheral Blood CD3+ T Cell

Seven studies including 346 patients with human brucellosis and 162 cases of healthy control, in which provided the data of the changes of peripheral blood CD3+ T cells in human brucellosis patients. Two studies reported that the proportions of CD3+ T cells in human brucellosis patients were significantly increased compared to control individuals [15, 19], while another 5 studies [17, 18, 20–22] showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups. The heterogeneity test showed (I² = 85.6%, 95% CI (72.4%; 92.5%), ), indicating that there is statistical heterogeneity between studies. With regard to the heterogeneity results, random effects model was used. A meta-analysis showed that the proportions of CD3+ T cells in human brucellosis patients were increased but no significant difference between patients and control individuals ([MD = 1.6265, 95% CI (−1.8789; 5.1319), ]). The forest plot for these analyses was shown in Figure 2. Sensitivity analysis was included in the literature, and the effect of single study on the combined results was evaluated. The analysis showed that the results were not substantially altered, when any one study was deleted, as shown in Table 2. Egger’s regression asymmetry test was used to evaluate publication bias, if any. No bias was found (, df = 5, ).

Figure 2: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood CD3+ T cell in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

Table 2: The results of CD3+ T cell data sensitivity analysis.

Influential analysis (random effects model)

MD
95% CI
value
Tau²
I²

Omitting 1
0.5238
[−2.5631; 3.6106]
0.7395
10.5972
74.9%

Omitting 2
2.4580
[−1.2836; 6.1997]
0.1979
17.8897
85.7%

Omitting 3
1.9108
[−1.9972; 5.8188]
0.3379
20.2834
87.8%

Omitting 4
0.7666
[−2.9579; 4.4912]
0.6866
17.5758
85.1%

Omitting 5
2.2725
[−1.6304; 6.1755]
0.2538
19.6843
86.5%

Omitting 6
2.1258
[−1.9855; 6.2371]
0.3109
21.8144
84.7%

Omitting 7
1.2547
[−2.6029; 5.1123]
0.5238
19.8369
87.8%

3.3. Changes of Peripheral Blood CD4+ T Cell

Changes of peripheral blood CD4+ T cells were reported by 8 trials, containing 396 patients with human brucellosis and 212 cases of healthy control. In the 8 studies we selected, 6 studies reported that proportions of CD4+ T cells in human brucellosis patients were significantly decreased compared to control individuals [15–17, 19, 20, 22]; the other of 2 studies showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups [18, 21]. The result (I² = 92.1%, 95% CI (86.8%, 95.3%), ) is showed by the heterogeneity test in the meta-analysis. Regarding this conclusion, the random effects model is applied.

Results of the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased proportion of CD4+ T cells in human brucellosis patients compared to healthy subject individuals ([MD = −9.03, 95% CI (−12.93; −5.14), ]). The forest plot for these analyses was shown in Figure 3. We also conducted sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of individual studies on the pooled results. The pooled results were not substantially altered, when any one study was deleted (Table 3). Egger’s regression asymmetry test showed no evidence of publication bias (, df = 6, ).

Figure 3: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood CD4+ T cell in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

Table 3: The results of CD4+ T cell data sensitivity analysis.

Influential analysis (random effects model)

MD
95% CI
value
Tau²
I²

Omitting 1
−9.4574
[−14.0627; −4.8521]
<0.0001
33.4726
91.0%

Omitting 2
−7.8215
[−11.0090; −4.6339]
<0.0001
13.7059
80.3%

Omitting 3
−8.7126
[−13.0720; −4.3533]
<0.0001
30.0784
93.2%

Omitting 4
−10.1635
[−14.0935; −6.2334]
<0.0001
23.9963
91.9%

Omitting 5
−9.2435
[−13.6663; −4.8207]
<0.0001
30.8919
93.1%

Omitting 6
−9.2212
[−13.6181; −4.8242]
<0.0001
30.5423
93.1%

Omitting 7
−9.8610
[−13.9606; −5.7614]
<0.0001
26.2844
92.4%

Omitting 8
−7.6681
[−11.5829; −3.7532]
0.0001
24.6279
92.3%

3.4. Changes of Peripheral Blood CD8+ T Cell

Eight trails with 396 patients with human brucellosis and 212 cases of healthy control reported changes of peripheral blood CD8+ T cell. These trials show homogeneity in the consistency of the trial results (I² = 77.2%, 95% CI (54.7%, 88.5%), ). Therefore, a random effects model should have been used for statistical analysis. Meta-analysis showed that there is a significantly increased proportion of CD8+ T cell in human brucellosis patients compared to healthy subject individuals ([MD = 5.24, 95% CI (2.99; 7.50), ]). Five studies reported significantly increased proportions of CD8+ T cells in human brucellosis patients compared to control individuals [15, 16, 19, 20, 22]; the other 3 studies showed that there were no significant difference between the two groups [17, 18, 21]. The forest plots for these analyses were shown in Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the above meta-analysis results were relatively stable, as shown in Table 4. Egger’s regression asymmetry test showed no evidence of publication bias (, df = 6, ).

Figure 4: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood CD8+ T cell in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

Table 4: The results of CD8+ T cell data sensitivity analysis.

Influential analysis (random effects model)

MD
95% CI
value
Tau²
I²

Omitting 1
6.7050
[5.7618; 7.6482]
<0.0001
8.3543
77.5%

Omitting 2
4.8388
[3.5210; 6.1566]
<0.0001
8.5000
71.9%

Omitting 3
6.5501
[5.6575; 7.4427]
<0.0001
5.7473
74.8%

Omitting 4
6.5028
[5.6013; 7.4042]
<0.0001
7.5933
79.0%

Omitting 5
6.0810
[5.1607; 7.0012]
<0.0001
7.4068
77.1%

Omitting 6
6.5711
[5.6481; 7.4941]
<0.0001
8.3139
78.9%

Omitting 7
6.6377
[5.7287; 7.5466]
<0.0001
6.5298
75.8%

Omitting 8
6.2442
[5.3510; 7.1373]
<0.0001
7.1158
78.5%

3.5. Changes of Peripheral Blood CD4+/CD8+ Ratio

Of the 8 included trials, 4 articles [15, 16, 19, 20] provided data of the changes of peripheral blood CD4+/CD8+ ratio in human brucellosis patients compared to controls including 291 patients with human brucellosis and 141 cases of healthy control. The trials showed homogeneity in the consistency of the trial results (I² = 94.9%, 95% CI (90.0%, 97.4%), ). Therefore, a random effects model should have been used for statistical analysis. In the 4 studies we selected, each of them reported significantly decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio in human brucellosis patients compared to control individuals. Results of the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased proportion of CD4+/CD8+ ratio human brucellosis patients compared to healthy individuals ([MD = −0.6291, 95% CI (−0.99, −0.27), ]). The forest plot for these analyses was shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood CD4+/CD8+ ratio in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

3.6. Changes of Peripheral Blood Th1 Cell

Changes of peripheral blood Th1 cell were also reported by 3 trials, which included 99 patients with human brucellosis and 85 cases of healthy control. In the 3 studies we selected, 1 reported significantly increased proportion of Th1 cells in human brucellosis patients compared to control individuals [16], 1 reported significantly decreased proportion of Th1 cell in human brucellosis patients compared to control individuals [17], and the rest of the 1 study found that there were no significant difference between the two groups [22]. The results of heterogeneity test (I² = 98.1%, 95% CI (96.4%, 98.9%), ) indicate that there is statistical heterogeneity between studies. With regard to the heterogeneity results, random effects model was used. Results of the meta-analysis showed increased proportions of Th1 cells in human brucellosis patients but no significant difference between patients and control individuals ([MD = 4.51, 95% CI (−9.39, 18.40), ]). The forest plot for these analyses was shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood Th1 cell in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

3.7. Changes of Peripheral Blood Th2 Cell

There are 3 articles providing data of the changes of peripheral Th2 cells in human brucellosis patients compared to controls including 99 patients with human brucellosis and 85 cases of healthy control. In the 3 studies we selected, 1 reported significantly increased proportion of Th2 cells in human brucellosis patients compared to control individuals [16]; the rest of the 2 studies found that there were no significant differences between the two groups [17, 22]. These trials show homogeneity in the consistency of the trial results [I² = 98.1%, 95% CI (96.5%, 99.0%), ]. Therefore, a random effects model should have been used for statistical analysis. Results of the meta-analysis showed increased proportions of Th2 cell in human brucellosis patients but no significant difference between patients and control individuals ([MD = 0.93, 95% CI (−1.21, 3.07), ]). The forest plot for these analyses was shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Forest plot of the changes of peripheral blood Th2 cell in human brucellosis patients compared with controls.

4. Discussion

Although brucellosis is a disease that can be cured, there are still 5%~15% of brucellosis progression to chronicity with characteristics of a typical clinical manifestation, chronic fatigue syndrome, and recurrence [7, 23, 24]. Brucellosis is an infection-allergic zoonosis caused by brucella and has a worldwide distribution. There are more than 50 million new infections in the world every year. In recent years, the prevalence of brucellosis infection in China has also increased significantly [25]. Chinese CDC data showed that the annual incidence had increased from 5000 cases in 2002 to more than 60 thousand cases in 2015 [25]. In order to reveal the variation of T cell subsets such as CD3+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios, Th1 cells, and Th2 cells in peripheral blood and further clarify its clinical significance, a total of 8 related articles were systematically evaluated in the study. All the researches were case-control studies. The quality of the research was evaluated by the NOS standard, and the overall score was 6~8. In general, the number of research in system analysis is not enough, the clinical studies of higher quality and large samples are needed to provide scientific and reliable evidence for the clinical application.

In recent years, the importance of T cells in brucella infection has been increasingly emphasized. Brucella was considered as an intracellular parasitic bacteria; in pathogenesis, cell-mediated immunity was the main reason [26, 27]. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes secrete cytokines such as interferon-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-2, which promote Th1 related to cytokine production, while the cytokine production and release by T lymphocytes can enhance the bactericidal ability of macrophages [28]. Interferon-gamma secreted by T lymphocytes not only activates the antibacterial ability of macrophages but also activates the cytotoxic effect of T lymphocyte [29]. Rafiei et al. found that the proportion of T lymphocytes secreting interferon-gamma in peripheral blood of chronic brucellosis patients was significantly lower than that in patients with acute stage, while the proportion of T lymphocytes producing IL-13 increased significantly [30]. Disproportions of Th1/Th2 and increases of cytokines secreted by Th2 cells in patients with chronic phase suggest that CD4+ T lymphocyte dysfunction is associated with chronic brucellosis. The proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood of patients with acute brucellosis were not significantly different from that of healthy controls, while the proportion of CD8+ T lymphocytes increased significantly in patients with chronic brucellosis, especially in patients with recurrent or symptomatic symptoms. But only a few CD8+ T lymphocytes secrete interferon [31]. Brucellosis mouse model inoculated with T lymphocytes could reduce the number of brucella in mice spleen, which indicates that CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte immunity is involved in resistance to brucella infection [32]. MHC-II-deficient mice (without CD4+ T lymphocytes) had stronger ability to control S19 infection than MHC-I-deficient mice (without CD8+ T lymphocytes), indicating that CD8+ T lymphocytes play a major role in the immunity against brucellosis infection [33]. However, immunological studies on the interaction between host and brucella are mostly in cells or animal model experiments and cannot fully reflect the immune status of patients.

CD3+ T cells represent mature lymphocytes, which are the main active cells in cellular immunity, and CD3+ T cells represent the overall level of cellular immunity. By testing the changes of T lymphocyte subsets in 142 patients of brucellosis and 45 healthy controls, Gao et al. [15] has found that CD3+ T lymphocytes are increased in patients with brucellosis. Çelik et al. [19] reported that the proportion of CD3+ T lymphocytes in peripheral blood of patients with acute brucellosis was significantly increased. Some other researches showed that the numbers of peripheral blood CD3+ T lymphocytes had no significant difference between brucellosis patients and healthy controls. This study showed that CD3+ T cells in human brucellosis patients had increased but there were no significant difference between patients and control individuals. The conclusion that we obtained needs to be confirmed further.

CD4+ T cell is an auxiliary T lymphocyte that assists other cells to participate in the immune response. The decrease of CD4+ T cells can lead to a series of dysfunction in Tc, NK, macrophages, and B cells. CD8+ T cells are the main effector cells that play specific cytotoxic effects, specifically killing target cells, mainly involved in the resistance to intracellular infection [34] and antitumor [35] and participate in graft rejection [36]. CD8+ T cells are not just a homogeneous cell group, some part of them are immunosuppressive cells that inhibit the function of other immune cells [37]. The ratio of CD4+/CD8+ is related to the function of the effector T cells, usually keeping dynamic balance in order to maintain the stability of cellular immune function. The decrease in the number of CD4+ T cells and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ can lead to the dysfunction of the effector T cells. The conclusions from different related researches of the changes in the percentage of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, and CD4+ T/CD8+ T ratios in peripheral blood in patients with brucellosis are not consistent. According to the results of the rat model, it is conjectured that the CD8+ T lymphocyte actives as CTL and plays the cytotoxic effect by secreting granulysin [38]. Some scholars [39] also believed that it may only compensate for the ineffective CD4+ T lymphocyte response by increasing the number of CD8+ T lymphocyte in patients with chronic brucellosis. Some studies reported that the CD4+ T lymphocyte proliferation reaction ability in patients with chronic brucellosis was significantly lower than that of the healthy controls and the acute patients [40]. This study shows that the frequency of CD4+ T cells in brucellosis patients is lower than that of healthy controls, while the CD8 cell frequency is higher than that of controls, and the ratio of CD4/CD8 is lower than the control group, which shows that there is immunologic dysfunction of the T lymphocyte in patients with brucellosis. Further research is needed to confirm the changes of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function in peripheral blood of patients with brucellosis.

Th1 and Th2 cells are the first classified CD4+ T cell functional subgroups. Th1 cells mainly mediate cellular immunity and delayed hypersensitivity through secreted inflammatory cytokines. Th2 cells mainly mediate humoral immune response, and both of them must keep dynamic balance in order to maintain the stability of cellular immune function. The IFN-gamma secreted by Th1 cells antagonized the IL-4 secreted by Th2 cells, and IFN- gamma secreted by Th1 cells will destroy the macrophages infected with brucella [41–44]. Dorneles et al. [45] indicated that prime-immunized with B. abortus S19 or RB51 in cattle induce a strong and complex Th1 immune response characterized by proliferation of CD4+ Th1 cells and higher secretion of IFN-γ, which plays an important role in controlling the occurrence and development of brucella infection. Studies have shown that immune response induced by Th1 cells is necessary for highly effective vaccines to prevent brucellosis. Therefore, the increase of Th2 cell level in host cells may inhibit the immune response of Th1 cells and break the balance between Th1 and Th2 cells, leading the occurrence of brucellosis [46]. This study shows that proportions of Th1 and Th2 cells increased in human brucellosis patients but neither of them has significant difference between patients and control individuals. The statistical power of the analysis was not enough since only 3 studies were used for this part of the analysis; the conclusion that we obtained still needs further research.

Treg cells play an important role in preventing immune responses against pathogens [47]. Abbas et al. found that the numbers of CD4+ Treg cells and their CD25high and FoxP3high subsets increase significantly in the peripheral blood of human brucellosis, with this increase being greater in the chronic group [48]. By contrast, Ganji at al. found a significantly lower percentage of CD25/FoxP3+ Treg cells in chronic patients than in the acute patients and control groups [49]. Only 2 eligible studies are related to Treg cells in peripheral blood, which is unable to carry out the meta-analysis.

Th17 cells have been found to be major stimulatory participants in the pathogenesis of human disease [50]. In mouse models, Pujol et al. found that the activation of Th17-related response was ineffective to control the B. canis infection [51]. There were no reports on Th17 in patients with brucellosis.

Our study has some limitations. First, heterogeneities exist among the included documents, which may be related to the diversities of race, age, diagnostic criteria and the staging of acute and chronic illness. Second, it is hard to unify the standard staging of acute and chronic illness with the included literatures; the results of the case group in the literature consist of acute and chronic staging are combined with the formulas, leading to the failure to do more accurate analysis for the different stages of the brucellosis patients. Last, due to the quantity of the included literature is not enough, the subgroup analyses cannot be tested.

In summary, we found that there was immunologic dysfunction of T lymphocyte in patients with human brucellosis, which may provide some pieces of evidence for immune regulation therapy of brucellosis. More high-quality and large sample experiments are needed to further confirm the relationship between the frequency and function of peripheral blood T cells subsets and the pathogenesis of brucellosis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Key Research and Development Projects of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (Grant no. 2016B03047-1) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 11461073).

References

J. Ariza, M. Bosilkovski, A. Cascio et al., “Perspectives for the treatment of brucellosis in the 21st century: the Ioannina recommendations,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 12, article e317, 2007.

F. De Massis, A. Di Girolamo, A. Petrini, E. Pizzigallo, and A. Giovannini, “Correlation between animal and human brucellosis in Italy during the period 1997–2002,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 632–636, 2005.

S. S. Mangalgi, A. G. Sajjan, S. T. Mohite, and S. Gajul, “Brucellosis in occupationally exposed groups,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. DC24–DC27, 2016.

T. Buzgan, M. K. Karahocagil, H. Irmak et al., “Clinical manifestations and complications in 1028 cases of brucellosis: a retrospective evaluation and review of the literature,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. e469–e478, 2010.

M. Moosazadeh, R. Nikaeen, G. Abedi, M. Kheradmand, and S. Safiri, “Epidemiological and clinical features of people with Malta fever in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 157–167, 2016.

M. N. Seleem, S. M. Boyle, and N. Sriranganathan, “Brucellosis: a re-emerging zoonosis,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 140, no. 3-4, pp. 392–398, 2010.

M. J. Castaño and J. Solera, “Chronic brucellosis and persistence of Brucella melitensis DNA,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 2084–2089, 2009.

Z. Wang, W. Liu, T. Wu, P. Bie, and Q. Wu, “RNA-seq reveals the critical role of CspA in regulating Brucella melitensis metabolism and virulence,” Science China Life Sciences, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 417–424, 2016.

L. N. Velásquez, M. V. Delpino, A. E. Ibañez et al., “Brucella abortus induces apoptosis of human T lymphocytes,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 14, no. 7-8, pp. 639–650, 2012.

P. Skendros and I. Mitroulis, “Host cell autophagy in immune response to zoonotic infections,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2012, article 910525, 9 pages, 2012.

M. Durward, G. Radhakrishnan, J. Harms, C. Bareiss, D. Magnani, and G. A. Splitter, “Active evasion of CTL mediated killing and low quality responding CD8+ T cells contribute to persistence of brucellosis,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 4, article e34925, 2012.

M. Durward-Diioia, J. Harms, M. Khan, C. Hall, J. A. Smith, and G. A. Splitter, “CD8⁺ T cell exhaustion, suppressed gamma interferon production, and delayed memory response induced by chronic Brucella melitensis infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 4759–4771, 2015.

C. L. Baldwin and R. Goenka, “Host immune responses to the intracellular bacteria Brucella: does the bacteria instruct the host to facilitate chronic infection?” Critical Reviews™ in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 407–442, 2006.

W. Wang, J. Wu, J. Qiao et al., “Evaluation of humoral and cellular immune responses to BP26 and OMP31 epitopes in the attenuated Brucella melitensis vaccinated sheep,” Vaccine, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 825–833, 2014.

Q. Gao, D. Zhao, N. Zhang, D. Meng, and Y. Li, “Analysis of lymphocyte T subgroup in brucella patients,” Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine, vol. 36, no. 16, pp. 2364-2365, 2015.

Y. Gu, Y. Liu, S. Shi et al., “The detection and significance of dendritic cells in peripheral blood and Th1/Th2 cytokine content in patients with brucellosis,” Hebei Medical Journal, vol. 38, no. 14, pp. 2097–2100, 2016.

M. Rodriguez-Zapata, M. J. Matias, A. Prieto et al., “Human brucellosis is characterized by an intense Th1 profile associated with a defective monocyte function,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 3272–3279, 2010.

P. Skendros, P. Boura, D. Chrisagis, and M. Raptopoulou-Gigi, “Diminished percentage of CD4+ T-lymphocytes expressing interleukine-2 receptor alpha in chronic brucellosis,” Journal of Infection, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 192–197, 2007.

I. Çelik and H. H. Akbulut, “Lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with acute brucellosis,” Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 237–241, 2005.

A. A. Pourfathollah, M. B. Eslami, A. R. Yalda, and A. F. Sarraf Nejat, “Alteration of T-lymphocyte subpopulations in subacute and chronic brucellosis,” Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 191–194, 1996.

M. Rodriguez-Zapata, M. Alvarez-Mon, L. Manzano et al., “Diminished T lymphocyte proliferative response to polyclonal mitogens in acute brucellosis patients,” Infection, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 1996.

H. H. Akbulut, S. S. Kilic, V. Bulut, and M. Ozden, “Determination of intracellular cytokines produced by Th1 and Th2 cells using flow cytometry in patients with brucellosis,” FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 2005.

E. M. Galińska and J. Zagórski, “Brucellosis in humans--etiology, diagnostics, clinical forms,” Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 233–238, 2013.

J. Ko and G. A. Splitter, “Molecular host-pathogen interaction in brucellosis: current understanding and future approaches to vaccine development for mice and humans,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2003.

S. Lai, H. Zhou, W. Xiong et al., “Changing epidemiology of human brucellosis, China, 1955–2014,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–194, 2017.

M.-J. Grilló, J. Blasco, J. Gorvel, I. Moriyón, and E. Moreno, “What have we learned from brucellosis in the mouse model?” Veterinary Research, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 29, 2012.

S. Bessoles, M. Ni, S. Garcia-Jimenez, F. Sanchez, and V. Lafont, “Role of NKG2D and its ligands in the anti-infectious activity of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells against intracellular bacteria,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1619–1628, 2011.

P. Skendros and P. Boura, “Immunity to brucellosis,” Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'OIE, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 137–147, 2013.

P. Barrionuevo, M. V. Delpino, R. G. Pozner, L. N. Velásquez, J. Cassataro, and G. H. Giambartolomei, “Brucella abortus induces intracellular retention of mhc-i molecules in human macrophages down-modulating cytotoxic cd8⁺ T cell responses,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 487–502, 2013.

A. Rafiei, S. K. Ardestani, A. Kariminia, A. Keyhani, M. Mohraz, and A. Amirkhani, “Dominant Th1 cytokine production in early onset of human brucellosis followed by switching towards Th2 along prolongation of disease,” Journal of Infection, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 315–324, 2006.

M. C. Moreno-Lafont, R. López-Santiago, E. Zumarán-Cuéllar et al., “Antigen-specific activation and proliferation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes from brucellosis patients,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 340–347, 2002.

L. N. Araya, P. H. Elzer, G. E. Rowe, F. M. Enright, and A. J. Winter, “Temporal development of protective cell-mediated and humoral immunity in balb/c mice infected with brucella abortus,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 143, no. 10, pp. 3330–3337, 1989.

S. C. Oliveira and G. A. Splitter, “CD8⁺ type 1 cd44hi cd45 RBlo T lymphocytes control intracellular Brucella abortus infection as demonstrated in major histocompatibility complex class i- and class ii-deficient mice,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2551–2557, 1995.

S. Kato, N. Asano, T. Miyata-Takata et al., “T-cell receptor (tcr) phenotype of nodal epstein-barr virus (ebv)-positive cytotoxic t-cell lymphoma (ctl): a clinicopathologic study of 39 cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 462–471, 2015.

H. Nakajima, Y. Murakami, E. Morii et al., “Induction of eef2-specific antitumor ctl responses in vivo by vaccination with eef2-derived 9mer-peptides,” Oncology Reports, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1959–1966, 2016.

S. Cho, S. Dong, K. N. Parent, and M. Chen, “Immune-tolerant elastin-like polypeptides (iteps) and their application as ctl vaccine carriers,” Journal of Drug Targeting, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 328–339, 2015.

F. M. Batliwalla, N. Rufer, P. M. Lansdorp, and P. K. Gregersen, “Oligoclonal expansions in the CD8⁺CD28⁻ T cells largely explain the shorter telomeres detected in this subset:: analysis by flow FISH,” Human Immunology, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 951–958, 2000.

B. Clapp, X. Yang, T. Thornburg, N. Walters, and D. W. Pascual, “Nasal vaccination stimulates cd8⁺ T cells for potent protection against mucosal brucella melitensis challenge,” Immunology and Cell Biology, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 496–508, 2016.

H. Sun, R. Jiang, B. Han, Y. Xu, and X. Li, “Research progress of the immunological mechansm of human brucellosis chronic brucellosis,” Chinese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 439–441, 2017.

S. Kinikli, N. Turkcapar, M. B. Kucukay, G. Keskin, and G. Kinikli, “In vitro nonspecific mitogenic response of t-cell subsets in acute and chronic brucellosis,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 229–233, 2005.

M.-A. Vitry, D. Hanot Mambres, C. De Trez et al., “Humoral immunity and cd4⁺ th1 cells are both necessary for a fully protective immune response upon secondary infection with Brucella melitensis,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 8, pp. 3740–3752, 2014.

C. N. Pollak, M. M. Wanke, S. M. Estein et al., “Immunization with Brucella VirB proteins reduces organ colonization in mice through a Th1-type immune response and elicits a similar immune response in dogs,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 274–281, 2015.

Y. B. Im, W. B. Park, M. Jung, S. Kim, and H. S. Yoo, “Evaluation of th1/th2-related immune response against recombinant proteins of Brucella abortus infection in mice,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1132–1139, 2016.

J. S. Fahel, M. B. de Souza, M. T. R. Gomes et al., “5-lipoxygenase negatively regulates th1 response during Brucella abortus infection in mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 1210–1216, 2015.

E. M. S. Dorneles, G. K. Lima, A. Teixeira-Carvalho et al., “Immune response of calves vaccinated with Brucella abortus s19 or rb51 and revaccinated with rb51,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 9, article e0136696, 2015.

L. M. Coria, A. E. Ibañez, K. A. Pasquevich et al., “Brucella abortus Omp19 recombinant protein subcutaneously co-delivered with an antigen enhances antigen-specific T helper 1 memory responses and induces protection against parasite challenge,” Vaccine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 430–437, 2016.

D. M. Rothstein and G. Camirand, “New insights into the mechanisms of Treg function,” Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 376–384, 2015.

A. Bahador, J. Hadjati, N. Hassannejad et al., “Frequencies of CD4+ T regulatory cells and their CD25high and FoxP3high subsets augment in peripheral blood of patients with acute and chronic brucellosis,” Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 161–168, 2014.

A. Ganji, G. Mosayebi, E. Ghaznavi-Rad, K. Khosravi, and N. Zarinfar, “Evaluation of regulatory T cells in patients with acute and chronic brucellosis,” Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 91–96, 2017.

M. S. Maddur, P. Miossec, S. V. Kaveri, and J. Bayry, “Th17 cells: Biology, pathogenesis of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and therapeutic strategies,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 8–18, 2012.

M. Pujol, F. Castillo, C. Alvarez et al., “Variability in the response of canine and human dendritic cells stimulated with Brucella canis,” Veterinary Research, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 72, 2017.