Journal of Neurodegenerative DiseasesVolume 2013 (2013), Article ID 234572, 13 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/234572

Review Article

Reevaluating Metabolism in Alzheimer's Disease from the Perspective of the Astrocyte-Neuron Lactate Shuttle Model

Jordan T. Newington, Richard A. Harris, and Robert C. Cumming

Department of Biology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, N6A 5B7

Received 31 December 2012; Accepted 2 April 2013

Academic Editor: Barbara Picconi

Copyright © 2013 Jordan T. Newington et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

The conventional view of central nervous system (CNS) metabolism is based on the assumption that glucose is the main fuel source for active neurons and is processed in an oxidative manner. However, since the early 1990s research has challenged the idea that the energy needs of nerve cells are met exclusively by glucose and oxidative metabolism. This alternative view of glucose utilization contends that astrocytes metabolize glucose to lactate, which is then released and taken up by nearby neurons and used as a fuel source, commonly known as the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) model. Once thought of as a waste metabolite, lactate has emerged as a central player in the maintenance of neuronal function and long-term memory. Decreased neuronal metabolism has traditionally been viewed as a hallmark feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, a more complex picture of CNS metabolism is emerging that may provide valuable insight into the pathophysiological changes that occur during AD and other neurodegenerative diseases. This review will examine the ANLS model and present recent evidence highlighting the critical role that lactate plays in neuronal survival and memory. Moreover, the role of glucose and lactate metabolism in AD will be re-evaluated from the perspective of the ANLS.

1. Introduction

The human brain consumes approximately 20% of the body’s total energy yet only represents 2% of the total body mass, far outweighing the demand of other organs in the body. While other tissues in the body rely on a variety of energy sources, the brain is believed to primarily depend upon the oxidation of glucose to meet its energy demands. The majority of the energy produced by the oxidation of glucose is used for the maintenance and restoration of ion gradients associated with synaptic transmission, as well as uptake and recycling of neurotransmitters [1]. As an essential organ, the brain requires adequate glucose and oxygen delivery from the vasculature system, a process controlled by the precise regulation of energy supply and demand. Consequently, changes in brain activity are accompanied by changes in cerebral blood flow, a phenomenon which forms the basis of functional brain imaging technologies. For decades, glucose has been considered as the main, if not exclusive energy substrate for the adult brain. Glucose is normally metabolized through the glycolytic pathway to pyruvate and, in the presence of oxygen, is fully oxidized to CO₂ and water in the mitochondria. Over 17 times more energy is produced from mitochondrial respiration than from glycolysis (34 adenosine triphosphate (ATP) versus 2, respectively). Therefore, neurometabolism has traditionally been perceived as a process with a strict reliance on the oxidation of pyruvate in the mitochondria in order to meet the high energy needs of neurons.

Aerobic glycolysis, also known as the Warburg effect, is defined as glucose utilization in excess of that used for mitochondrial respiration despite sufficient oxygen to completely oxidize glucose for maximal ATP generation. A by-product of aerobic glycolysis is lactate, a metabolite which is normally exported out of cells. Lactate has traditionally been perceived as a dead-end product of glycolysis under hypoxic conditions, most commonly produced by skeletal muscle during exercise. However, in 1985 Brooks proposed that lactate produced by skeletal muscle during exercise is shuttled through the interstitium and vasculature to other sites in the body where it can be used as an oxidative metabolite [2]. Despite evidence suggesting that lactate is a valuable fuel source in the body, its presence in the brain has been interpreted as a sign of cerebral harm. Though lactate has long been considered a potentially toxic metabolic waste product, it is now recognized as not only a valuable energy substrate for CNS neurons but even as a preferred source of energy under certain circumstances [3, 4].

Over the last few decades, key information about brain metabolism has been gathered using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. PET allows for the in vivo determination of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose consumption, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption, and cerebral blood flow. Traditionally, ¹⁸F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose- (FDG-) PET signals were believed to primarily measure glucose utilization by neurons due to the high energy demand of this cell type during activation [5]. However, in the mid to late 1980s, an important series of PET studies challenged this assumption by showing that cerebral glucose consumption exceeds oxygen utilization in certain regions of the human brain [6, 7]. These early observations suggested that the metabolic needs of active neural tissue are met in a partially nonoxidative manner [6, 7]. More recently, Vaishnavi and colleagues, using a more refined PET analysis of 33 healthy adults, identified high rates of aerobic glycolysis in the medial and lateral parietal and prefrontal cortices, regions known to participate in cognitive control networks [8]. These observations brought support to the notion that the metabolic needs of active brain tissue are met, at least partially, by aerobic glycolysis. Further support was provided by various in vivo  ¹H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies in healthy adults which showed activity-dependent increases in lactate levels (the end product of aerobic glycolysis) in brain areas similar to those found in the PET studies [9–11]. The question then arises as to whether the changes in glucose metabolism (oxidative versus glycolytic) are taking place in different cellular compartments of the brain and/or are dependent on the specific needs of these areas.

2. The Astrocyte-Neuron Lactate Shuttle (ANLS) Model

The conventional view of glucose metabolism in the brain contends that glucose is the principle substrate for oxidative metabolism in both neurons and astrocytes [12, 13]. From this perspective, activation of nerve cells results in increased Na⁺K⁺ATPase activity and ATP consumption, which leads to the activation of the glycolytic pathway in both neurons and astrocytes [14]. However, during nerve cell activation, transient increases in the rate of glycolysis, in excess of the rate of respiration, are believed to be responsible for the production of lactate, which can be produced by both neurons and astrocytes [13, 15]. The subsequent buildup of lactate is believed to be harmful; therefore, its clearance via the circulatory system or uptake by supporting cells is necessary following nerve cell activation [12, 15]. However, studies performed in the early 1990s have challenged this conventional view of nerve cell metabolism and led to the proposal that lactate itself may function as a primary fuel source for neurons [16–18].

In most regions of the human brain astrocytes outnumber neurons [19]. These specialized glial cells play a key role in numerous functions of the brain including modulation of synaptic ion and neurotransmitter levels, defense against oxidative stress, and regulation of synapse formation and remodeling [20]. Astrocytes possess a unique morphology and spatial distribution that enable them to provide energy substrates from capillaries to neurons. At the morphological level, astrocytes are stellate shaped and have two types of specialized processes. First, astrocytes contain processes called perivascular end-feet which cover cerebral blood vessel capillaries [20, 21]. Importantly, both endothelial and astrocytic cells express the glucose transporter GLUT1 at the surface of these structures to allow for the efficient transfer of glucose into the CNS [22]. Additionally, astrocytes have fine perisynaptic processes that wrap around synapses in a dynamic fashion [20, 21, 23]. These features position astrocytes as the prevalent site of glucose entry into the brain and endow them with the capacity to sense neuronal activity at the synapse and respond with the appropriate metabolic supply from the vascular system [24]. Another key feature of astrocytes is that they are the primary cell type within the brain that can store glucose as glycogen [25–27]. Glycogen represents the major energy reserve in the brain during periods of low glucose (aglycemia). During increased activity, glycogen is broken down to lactate (a process termed glycogenolysis) to fuel neuronal metabolism [25]. Brain cells can utilize various energy substrates besides glucose, including lactate, pyruvate, glutamate, and glutamine [28].

Among these substrates, lactate has garnered considerable attention recently as an important fuel source for the brain. Astrocytes readily take up glucose from cerebral blood vessels, via GLUT1, and process it at a high capacity by aerobic glycolysis to produce lactate which is released into the extracellular space via monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs). Extracellular lactate is then taken up by neurons and converted to pyruvate, likely by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Pyruvate is subsequently converted to acetyl CoA, through the activity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and then enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle followed by the generation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) to fuel oxidative phosphorylation via the mitochondrial electron transport chain. In addition, astrocytes take up glutamate, the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, and convert it to glutamine as part of a recycling mechanism. In doing so, glutamate triggers a cascade of molecular events leading to an enhancement of glucose utilization by astrocytes [16]. Collectively, these findings led to the formation of the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle (ANLS) model (Figure 1), first proposed 18 years ago, which posits that (1) neuronal activity increases extracellular glutamate which is taken up by astrocytes via glutamate transporters leading to (2) a triggering of glucose uptake and aerobic glycolysis in astrocytes which (3) leads to a large increase in the production of lactate followed by its release into the extracellular space and (4) transport into neurons where it is used as an energy substrate for oxidative and nonoxidative derived ATP production (for review see [29]). Both astrocytes and neurons have the capacity to fully oxidize glucose and/or lactate [28]. However, astrocytes and neurons preferentially use different metabolic pathways which is, in part, due to cell type-specific expression patterns of key genes regulating energy metabolism, as discussed below.

Figure 1: The astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle hypothesis. The activation of nerve cells leads to the release of the neurotransmitter glutamate. Glutamate is actively taken up into astrocytes by glutamate transporters (GLT-1) and is converted into glutamine. The uptake of glutamate into astrocytes stimulates both increased glucose uptake from surrounding capillaries via glucose transporters (GLUT1) and increased aerobic glycolysis. Aerobic glycolysis can also be stimulated by the breakdown of intracellular stores of glycogen. Pyruvate is converted to lactate by lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme A (LDHA) and is exported out of the cell by the monocarboxylate transporter 1 or 4 (MCT1/4) and transported into nerve cells via MCT2. LDHB within nerve cells coverts lactate to pyruvate which is used to fuel oxidative phosphorylation within mitochondria. Glucose can also enter nerve cells via GLUT3 transporters.

3. Evidence in Support of the ANLS Model

Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter of the cerebral cortex. The ANLS model contends that astrocytic lactate production is tightly coupled to neuronal activation and glutamate release and subsequent glutamate uptake from the astrocytes. The first evidence for the existence of an ANLS was demonstrated by Pellerin and Magistretti in 1994, who showed that glutamate uptake in primary mouse cortical astrocytes stimulated aerobic glycolysis (glucose uptake and lactate production) [16]. Similar results were obtained with cultured glial Müller cells from the retina [30]. Moreover, using in vivo  ¹³C-NMR data from the rat brain cortex researchers showed that the rate at which glucose is oxidized within neurons is equal to the rate of glutamate cycling over a range of EEG activity (from isoelectric up to near-resting levels) [31]. Furthermore, knockout or knockdown of glutamate transporters results in a decrease in glucose uptake and lactate release from astrocytes in activated areas, suggesting that the regulation of brain metabolism is tightly regulated by synaptic activity [23, 32]. Astrocytes express GLUT1 which is responsible for the uptake of glucose from associated capillaries. In contrast, neurons primarily express GLUT3 transporters. Interestingly, Glut3 haploinsufficient (GLUT3+/−) mice exhibit similar rates and amounts of glucose uptake in the brain as wild-type mice [33]. In contrast, Glut1 haploinsufficiency (GLUT1+/−) results in decreased glucose uptake and severe neurological defects, suggesting that essential glucose uptake in the CNS primarily occurs in a GLUT1-dependent manner in astrocytes [34]. Furthermore, neuronal activity triggered by whisker stimulation, increases glucose uptake in astrocytes but not in neurons [35]. Thus astrocytes appear to be responsible for providing nerve cells with metabolic substrates in an activity-dependant manner. However, it should be noted that GLUT3 is found in abundance in synaptic membranes and transports glucose up to 7 times faster than GLUT1 transporters [36, 37]. Moreover, glucose has been found to be evenly distributed throughout the brain. As a readily available substrate, glucose is likely to be used to varying degrees in different subsets of neurons throughout the brain [38]. The uptake of glucose or lactate by neurons is therefore dependent on the location and needs of the cell.

The observed production of lactate in astrocytes following glutamate exposure led researchers to hypothesize that lactate released by astrocytes may be taken up by adjacent nerve cells and utilized as a primary energy source [16]. The interconversion between lactate and pyruvate is catalyzed by the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Immunohistochemical analysis of postmortem tissue taken from the hippocampus and occipital cortex revealed a selective distribution of LDH isoforms including LDHA (muscle type) and LDHB (heart type) in astrocytes and neurons, respectively [17]. There are five known LDH isoenzymes, each composed of tetramers containing different ratios of LDHA or LDHB. LDHA preferentially catalyzes the reduction of pyruvate to lactate whereas LDHB favors the oxidation of lactate to pyruvate. Thus the enrichment of LDHB, and associated conversion of lactate to pyruvate, within nerve cells would suggest a role for lactate as a fuel source. Indeed, using ¹³C labeling of lactate and NMR spectroscopy, it was shown that lactate released by astrocytes is taken up by neurons and used to drive the TCA cycle, as evidenced by increased labelling of TCA cycle intermediates [38, 39]. Similar in vivo studies in mice and rats revealed that not only does lactate cross the blood-brain barrier, it is almost exclusively metabolized by neurons [40, 41]. Interestingly, intracellular delivery of glucose to astrocytes can sustain neuronal synaptic transmission during glucose deprivation [42]. However, this effect was suppressed in the presence of an inhibitor of MCT lactate transporters, supporting the hypothesis that glucose taken up by astrocytes is metabolized to lactate, which is then released and taken up by nerve cells to sustain synaptic activity [42].

The preference for lactate as a fuel source has been observed in: cortical neurons [43], chick sympathetic ganglia [44], rabbit vagus nerve [45], and human brain in vivo [46]. Thus, these results suggest that astrocytes primarily rely on aerobic glycolysis in the cell cytosol whereas nerve cells primarily use mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to support their energy demands. Further support for this theory comes from studies in which ATP levels were measured in cultured glial and nerve cells from rat hypothalamus and cerebellum following exposure to oligomycin, an inhibitor of the mitochondrial Fo-F₁ATP-synthase. Interestingly, oligomycin treatment induced a significant decrease in ATP levels in neurons but not in glial cells, indicating that ATP production in neurons is dependent on mitochondrial function whereas glial cells produce ATP in a mitochondrial independent manner [47]. Moreover, neurons exhibit increased ATP production following addition of exogenous lactate to the culture medium, whereas glial cells are unresponsive to exogenous lactate [47]. Collectively, these results indicate that glucose is taken up into astrocytes in a glutamate-dependent manner, converted to lactate, and exported to fuel neuronal energy needs. However, it should be noted that both astrocytes and neurons have the capacity to fully oxidize glucose and/or lactate during periods of limited substrate availability [28].

Despite evidence supporting the existence of an ANLS, it remains a controversial hypothesis. It has been argued that the use of in vitro models (i.e., cultured neurons, astrocytes, and brain slices), in addition to flawed experimental designs, have led to the incorrect interpretation that neurons preferentially utilize lactate over glucose [48]. Alternative viewpoints have been proposed in which glucose, and associated oxidative metabolism, provides the main fuel source for the brain under normal activating conditions in sedentary or modestly physically active subjects. In contrast, alternative substrates, including lactate, may substantially contribute to brain energetics when glucose supply is inadequate (during strenuous physical work, exercise, or hypoxia) or when glucose supply is inadequate (during hypoglycemia or intense brain activity). Thus, it can be argued that lactate usage as a fuel source is a result of opportunity (i.e., a glucose-sparing substrate), not of preference or necessity [48]. Opponents of the ANLS await for more in vivo evidence to support the assertion that the ANLS is a prominent form of metabolism in the brain.

4. The Intracellular Mitochondrial Lactate Shuttle

With recent evidence strongly supporting the ANLS model the question arises as to how lactate is being processed at the intracellular level in neurons. Intracellular lactate may follow two fates; it can either be converted into pyruvate in the cytosol or directly shuttled into the mitochondria for further oxidation. Early studies demonstrated that lactate oxidation can occur within the mitochondria of liver, heart, and skeletal muscle cells [49, 50]. The discovery of both mitochondrial localized lactate transporters and LDH provided further evidence that lactate can fuel mitochondrial metabolism [49, 51]. In contrast, other groups failed to show either mitochondrial LDH or lactate oxidation, and it was claimed that skeletal muscle mitochondria do not contain significant amounts of LDH activity [52, 53]. These contradictory findings have led to a vigorous debate about whether mitochondrial oxidation of lactate occurs in skeletal muscle. However, more recent studies suggest that a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex does indeed exist in neurons. Primary cerebellar granule cells were shown to transport and metabolize L-lactate in mitochondria [54]. Mitochondrial oxidation of lactate to produce ATP was also shown in a human astrocytic cell line [55]. Treatment with oxamate, an inhibitor LDH, abolishes mitochondrial lactate consumption [55]. Immunohistochemical analyses of rat brain revealed that MCT1, MCT2, and LDH colocalize with the inner mitochondrial membrane marker cytochrome oxidase (COX) in cortical, hippocampal, and thalamic neurons [56]. Additionally, these enzymes coprecipitated with COX from isolated mitochondria [56]. The oxidation of lactate to pyruvate is accompanied by the reduction of NAD+ to NADH, an important reducing agent in the cell. Therefore, increased oxidation of lactate within the mitochondria may aid in the supply of NADH for the electron transport chain. Interestingly, electrophysiological measurements testing the effects of malonate and oxamate, two different LDH inhibitors, and the neuronal activator glutamate in rat hippocampal samples suggest that L-lactate, not pyruvate, is the end product of neuronal glycolysis in vitro [57]. These observations have prompted the hypothesis that lactate is the major product of cerebral glycolysis, whether aerobic or anaerobic, neuronal or astrocytic, under rest or during activation [58]. An additional layer of complexity arises from an intracellular-mitochondrial lactate shuttle and mitochondrial oxidation complexes present within neurons [56]. However, more functional evidence is needed to confirm this hypothesis in vivo.

5. Astrocytic Lactate Production and Memory

Lactate has long been considered a metabolic dead end, hence the ANLS model has been met with considerable skepticism [12, 14]. However, this viewpoint has changed in light of growing evidence indicating that lactate transport from astrocytes to neurons is essential for long-term memory [27, 59]. Memory is a process in which information is encoded, stored, and retrieved. Short-term memories involve the retention of information for a brief period of time and are dependent on posttranslational modifications of proteins [60, 61]. Long-term memories are formed after learning, retention, and consolidation which require the activation of signalling cascades that lead to gene activation, protein synthesis, and the growth of new synaptic connections [60, 61]. The cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) is a nuclear protein that modulates transcription and plays a central role in long-term memory following phosphorylation-dependent activation [60–62]. Not surprisingly, memory and learning are metabolically demanding processes, which appear in part to be dependent on glycogen metabolism [27, 63, 64]. Glycogen represents the major energy reserve in the brain and is stored exclusively in astrocytes, not neurons [25–27]. During periods of low glucose or increased activity glycogen is broken down to lactate to fuel neuronal metabolism [25]. A role for glycogenolysis in long-term memory formation was first observed by Gibbs and colleagues who found that intracerebral injection of 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-arabinitol (DAB) (a glycogen phosphorylase inhibitor) in day-old chickens resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of long-term memory [64]. Recently, a more intensive study investigating the importance of astrocytic glycogenolysis and long-term memory was performed by Suzuki et al. who examined learning and memory in rats using an inhibitory avoidance (IA) test. To test for the importance of glycogenolysis in hippocampal astrocytes rats were injected with DAB either 15 min before or immediately after IA training [63]. Training led to a significant increase in extracellular lactate in the hippocampus which was abolished by DAB administration [27, 63]. DAB had no effect on short-term memory (tested an hour after) but blocked long-term memory (tested at 24 hr) [63]. Importantly, L-lactate coadministered with DAB rescued memory loss [63]. Similar results were obtained testing spatial working memory in rats using spontaneous alteration tasks [27]. Furthermore, astrocytic glycogenolysis also appears to be required for phosphorylation of CREB (pCREB), a key molecular event linked to memory formation [63]. DAB-induced reduction of pCREB activation was also rescued by exogenous L-lactate suggesting a possible signalling role for lactate [20, 63].

The ability to shuttle (uptake and release) lactate to various regions of the brain is dependent on MCT activity. Examination of both MCT mRNA and protein levels in mouse cortical tissues revealed that MCT1 and MCT4 were expressed almost exclusively in astrocytes, whereas MCT2 was strongly expressed in neurons [65–67]. Based on these findings Suzuki and colleagues demonstrated the importance of CNS lactate transport on memory by using intrahippocampal injections of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to individually decrease expression of MCT1, MCT2, and MCT4 [63]. Decreased expression of MCT1 or MCT4 in astrocytes resulted in disrupted long-term memory formation that was rescued by exogenous administration of lactate but not glucose [63]. Disrupting the expression of neuronal MCT2 also resulted in loss of long-term memory which was not rescued by exogenous lactate or glucose, indicating that transport of lactate into neurons is required for long-term memory formation [63]. Taken together, these results suggest that the astrocytic lactate export by MCT-1 and/or MCT-4, and subsequent import into neurons through MCT2, is essential for long-term memory [63]. Moreover, these findings lend additional support to the ANLS model. However, the role of lactate transport in memory loss associated with neurodegenerative diseases has remained largely unexplored.

6. Altered Mitochondrial Metabolism and ROS Production in Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is one of the most common neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly characterized by a range of progressive cognitive deficits and memory loss. AD is strongly associated with widespread nerve cell death and the accumulation of extracellular plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles within the brain [68, 69]. These plaques are primarily composed of amyloid--peptide (A), a 39–42 amino acid peptide derived from the proteolytic cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by secretases, including Presenilin 1 (Psen1), Presenilin2 (Psen2), and -secretase [68, 70, 71]. The amyloid cascade hypothesis, first proposed over 20 years ago, suggests that A deposition in the brain is a primary causative agent of AD [72]. A-induced neuronal toxicity is linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [70–78]. The impairment of mitochondrial metabolism in AD has been well documented [79, 80]. It is not entirely clear how A perturbs mitochondrial function; however, A has been shown to accumulate directly within mitochondria of CNS neurons in AD patients and in transgenic mice [80–83]. Moreover, A has been shown to directly interact with and inhibit the enzymatic activity of alcohol dehydrogenase (ABAD) in mitochondria [82]. Disrupting the interaction between A and ABAD reduces mitochondrial derived ROS and increases oxygen consumption and mitochondrial activity [84]. A has also been shown to bind directly to cytochrome oxidase (COX) subunit 1, a member of complex IV of the electron transport chain, which likely accounts for the decreased activity of this enzyme in AD [85]. Additionally, treatment of SK-N-SH cells (a human neuroblastoma cell line) with A results in a dose-dependent decrease in mRNA levels of mitochondrial COX subunits [86]. Human mitochondrial transcription factor-1 (TFAM) mRNA levels are also decreased following A-treatment [86]. Moreover, reduced activity of enzymes participating in the TCA cycle and electron transport chain have been well documented in the brains of patients with AD [87–89]. In summary, A-mediated perturbation of mitochondrial electron transport and metabolism results in increased ROS production and damage to essential cellular components such as nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), lipids, and proteins in the brain.

7. Activation of Aerobic Glycolysis Promotes Resistance to Aβ

Interestingly, nerve cells selected for resistance against A toxicity exhibit a shift in metabolism to favor lactate production [90]. These changes are linked to increased glucose uptake and flux through the glycolytic pathway [91]. This switch in metabolism from mitochondrial respiration to aerobic glycolysis is a common phenotype of cancer cells and is driven in part by the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit (HIF-1) [92]. HIF-1 is a heterodimeric transcription factor that is stabilized in low oxygen environments (hypoxia) to facilitate metabolic adaptation to hypoxic conditions. HIF-1 activation induces the transcription of glucose transporters, glycolytic enzymes, and LDHA, thereby increasing the conversion of glucose to lactate [93, 94]. Moreover, HIF-1 plays a role in shutting down mitochondrial respiration by upregulating the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) [95]. PDK1 phosphorylates and inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDH), limiting the oxidation of pyruvate within the mitochondria and decreasing oxygen consumption [92]. In addition to maintaining energy homeostasis in low oxygen environments HIF-1 stabilization results in a decrease in ROS production [95]. Indeed, HIF-1 stabilization in cancer cells results in decreased respiration and associated ROS production which renders these cells more resistant to apoptotic stimuli [96].

Similar to cancer cells, the stabilization of HIF-1 accounts for the observed metabolic changes in A-resistant cells [91]. Interestingly, A-resistant nerve cells also express increased levels of PDK1 accompanied by increased LDHA activity and lactate production when compared to control cells [90]. As a result, mitochondrial derived ROS, which is closely associated with A toxicity, is markedly diminished in resistant relative to sensitive cells [90]. Chemical or genetic inhibition of LDHA or PDK1 resensitizes resistant cells to A-induced cell death [90]. Moreover, overexpression of either PDK1 or LDHA in a rat CNS cell line confers resistance to A and other neurotoxins, which is associated with a lower mitochondrial membrane potential and decreased ROS production [97]. PDK1- and LDHA-overexpressing cells also exhibit decreased oxygen consumption but maintain levels of ATP under both normal culture conditions and following A treatment [97]. Interestingly, PDK1- and LDHA-overexpressing nerve cells are still sensitive to mitochondrial inhibitors such as rotenone, antimycin, and oligomycin [97]. These findings indicate that although activation of aerobic glycolysis confers resistance to A, cells which adopt this metabolism still require a functional mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). The significance of this paradoxical observation is unknown but may indicate that a functional ETC is required for efficient mitochondrial oxidation of lactate and ATP production. Moreover, recent evidence showed supplementation with the oxidative energy substrates pyruvate and 3-beta-hydroxybutyrate in vitro or in vivo decreased A-induced neuronal dysfunction supporting a protective role of active ETC in AD [98]. However, it is uncertain how these oxidative energy substrates restore neuronal function, and their effects on mitochondrial derived ROS in cell culture and animal models of AD remain unknown.

Intriguingly, decreased expression of both LDHA and PDK1 was observed in cortical extracts of 12-month-old AD transgenic (APPswe/PSEN1dE9) mice [97]. A loss of PDK1 expression was also observed in postmortem cortical tissue from AD patients. It should be noted that this study did not distinguish between expression of PDK1 in nerve and glial cells. Immunohistochemical analysis of PDK1 and LDHA in surviving neurons and astrocytes in AD brain would offer further insight into the relationship of these proteins in protecting against A toxicity. Interestingly, the activity of LDHA has been previously shown to be elevated in the frontal and temporal cortex of patients with AD [99]. In contrast, a reduction in both expression and activity of PDH, the molecular target of PDK1, has been reported in the AD brain [86, 100–102]. However, the activity of PDK1 in AD brain tissue has not been examined. Collectively, these findings indicate that PDK1- or LDHA-mediated aerobic glycolysis protects against A toxicity while maintaining cellular ATP levels (Figure 2). Loss of these proteins may contribute to the cognitive decline and nerve cell death observed in AD.

Figure 2: Aerobic glycolysis in A-resistant cells. The stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF1) in amyloid beta- (A-) resistant cells stimulates increased expression of glucose transporters and glycolytic enzymes thereby increasing the conversion of glucose to pyruvate. Additionally, HIF-1 induces the transcription of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), resulting in an increase in the conversion of pyruvate to lactate. Furthermore, HIF-1 suppresses mitochondrial respiration by upregulating pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1). PDK1 phosphorylates and inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) resulting in decreased flux through the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and repressed oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Decreased OXOPHOS attenuates mitochondrial ROS production rendering cells more resistant to apoptosis in the presence of A. In cells failing to undergo aerobic glycolysis, increased mitochondrial respiration potentiates A-mediated ROS production to toxic levels resulting in cell death.

8. Aerobic Glycolysis, AD, and Cancer

The progressive decline in cerebral glucose utilization is known to occur with age and in AD, possibly contributing to both nerve cell loss and memory decline [103, 104]. Although a reduction in cerebral glucose metabolism, as measured by FDG-PET, is commonly used in the diagnosis of AD, recent evidence suggest that glucose utilization is more complex in the AD brain [105, 106]. A recent PET imaging study, which measured both glucose consumption and oxygen utilization, revealed a strong correlation between the spatial distribution of elevated aerobic glycolysis and A plaques in brain tissue from patients with AD, as well as normal individuals with high levels of A deposition but without clinical manifestation of the disease [106]. In the developing nervous system, aerobic glycolysis is believed to account for 90% of glucose consumed [107]. During childhood this fraction accounts for 35% of glucose utilization and finally drops to 10–12% in the adult brain [8]. PET studies of cognitively normal individuals have shown an age-associated decrease in FDG uptake in regions of the brain frequently affected in AD, although these studies did not determine what proportion of glucose was processed by aerobic glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation [108]. Moreover, recent imaging analysis of patients with AD revealed regional variations in atrophy, hypometabolism, and A deposition [109]. Importantly, A deposition was not significantly related to either atrophy or hypometabolism, prompting the authors to speculate that the observed disconnect between hypometabolism and A levels likely reflects involvement of region-specific pathological or protective mechanisms [109]. In fact, a recent PET imaging analysis revealed that inheritance of the apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) allele, a major genetic risk factor for AD, and not A deposition, strongly correlates with reduced cerebral glucose metabolism in normal aging [110]. ApoE4 is a neurotoxic protein that either increases the production of or interferes with clearance of A [111]. However, ApoE4 can promote neurotoxicity in an A-independent manner. In particular, ApoE4 is susceptible to neuron-specific proteolysis which generates C-terminal truncated versions of ApoE4 which localize to mitochondria, bind electron transport chain enzymes, reduce respiration, and cause neurotoxicity [112, 113]. Thus, mitochondrial accumulation of ApoE4 fragments in neurons may be responsible for the hypometabolism observed in AD. In contrast, elevated aerobic glycolysis may arise in certain areas of the brain most susceptible to insult as a preemptive protective mechanism or in response to A accumulation during aging. Loss of this protective mechanism may render certain areas of the brain susceptible to A-induced neurotoxicity.

Interestingly, in a recent study it was found that cancer survivors have a lower risk of developing AD than those without cancer [114]. In contrast, patients who suffered from AD had a lower risk of incident cancer [114]. It is possible that individuals with cancer also have a higher propensity to activate aerobic glycolysis, as this form of metabolism confers a growth and survival advantage (i.e., antiapoptotic function) to cancer cells [96]. However, individuals who survive cancer may still have higher innate levels of aerobic glycolysis, presumably in areas of the brain, which may protect against the development of AD. In contrast, patients with AD may have lower levels of aerobic glycolysis, which not only renders them susceptible to the toxic effects of A but also leads to decreased susceptibility to developing cancer. A similar trend has been observed in Parkinson’s disease [115, 116]. Thus it may be valuable in the future to examine aerobic glycolysis in a Parkinson’s disease context. Taken together these data suggest an inverse association between cancer and the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Future studies that examine the direct relationship between aerobic glycolysis, AD, and cancer may provide more insight into this fascinating inverse relationship.

9. Lactate Is a Neuroprotective Metabolite

Although aerobic glycolysis and associated lactate production has been shown to enhance memory, the effect of this metabolism on age-dependent or AD-related memory decline and neuronal loss has never formally been examined. Interestingly, L-lactate treatment following an ischemic insult is neuroprotective and attenuates neurological deficits in mice [117, 118]. Intracerebroventricular or intravenous injection of lactate has also been shown to exert a neuroprotective effect during experimentally induced hypoglycemia or cerebral ischemia [117–119]. Lactate also exerts neuroprotective effects via transcriptional activation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in human astrocytes and the SH-SY5Y cell line [120]. BDNF is a necessary factor for the survival of nerve cells within the CNS and is also essential for long-term memory storage [121]. In addition, under normoxic conditions lactate can promote HIF-1 stabilization by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase 2 activity, the enzyme responsible for HIF-1 degradation [122]. Stabilization of HIF-1 increases glycolysis and lactate production, events associated with resistance to A toxicity [90, 91]. Moreover, exogenous lactate has been shown to increase both MCT1 and cytochrome c oxidase (COX) mRNA and protein expression in L6 cells [123]. Thus lactate can elicit a number of events leading to activation of transcription factors involved in its transport and possible processing through the mitochondria. Furthermore, several studies have reported that lactate increases vasodilation [124, 125], and continuous lactate production in the activated brain may serve as a signaling mechanism to increase blood flow and fuel delivery to the brain. Therefore lactate may function as a versatile signaling molecule by both activating neuroprotective metabolism and promoting increased blood flow to certain regions of the brain.

10. Exercise-Induced Lactate Production Enhances Memory

During periods of physical exertion such as exercise, systemic lactate levels increase. Under resting conditions the brain releases small amounts of lactate which increases during exercise or hypoxia [126]. During exercise the cerebral uptake of lactate also increases. As such, the brain plays an active role in the clearance of excessive lactate during exercise [126–130]. The oxidation of lactate in the brain may account for as much as 33% of the total energy substrate used by the brain [126]. In contrast, cerebral glucose uptake is reduced by ~25% when cerebral lactate uptake is increased, suggesting that the brain preferentially consumes lactate during exercise [128]. Therefore, it appears that lactate is an important fuel source for brain metabolism both under normal conditions and during exercise. Given the importance of glycogen-derived lactate for long-term memory, it is feasible that exercise may benefit memory and cognitive function. Indeed, a study that examined the effects of a single bout of exercise on motor memory found that subjects that exercised before or after practice of a motor skill displayed significantly better retention of that skill 24 hrs and 7 days after practicing compared to subjects that did not exercise [131]. Interestingly, those that exercised after practice displayed better retention of the motor skill 7 days after training when compared to those that exercised before [131]. These findings suggest a single bout of exercise before or after learning a motor skill can improve long-term retention of that skill. This retention is maximized when exercise is performed after training, or during the consolidation phase of memory [131]. Moreover, regular exercise has not only been shown to have a positive effect on memory retention but also appears to reduce the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases including AD. Notably, exercise ameliorated memory deficits and A deposition in APP transgenic mice [132]. In addition, a longitudinal study that followed 716 older individuals without dementia over 4 years assessed the link between exercise and AD [133]. The outcome of the study revealed that a higher level of total daily physical activity was associated with a reduced risk of AD [133]. Similar results were obtained when individuals were followed over a 14-year period [134].

Interestingly BNDF is significantly elevated in response to exercise, possibly through increased lactate production, which may also account for some of the neuroprotective effects of exercise [135]. It should be noted that intravenous sodium lactate administration in AD patients failed to improve cognitive functioning, although it did slightly improve semantic memory [136]. However, this study only examined the effects of a single 20 min intravenous administration of sodium lactate on cognitive function. Because lactate was only administered for a short period it is unknown if longer periods or multiple administrations would improve cognitive function in AD patients. The systematic administration of glucose to AD patients does, however, improve memory [137]. In contrast, insulin deficiency in AD transgenic mice exacerbates the AD phenotype [138]. Notably, AD patients are at an increased risk for type II diabetes, indicating an important association between glucose uptake and disease progression [139]. Furthermore, patients with type II diabetes are at increased risk for developing cognitive defects, AD, or related dementias [140, 141]. Collectively, these observations suggest that glucose uptake, aerobic glycolysis, and associated lactate production may play a key role in promoting neuronal survival and preventing memory loss during aging and in AD. However, the role of aerobic glycolysis in maintaining CNS neuronal function during aging and preventing AD progression has never experimentally been examined. Clearly alterations in brain metabolism are tightly linked to AD, and future research should focus on mechanisms that either enhance glucose uptake, aerobic glycolysis, or lactate production.

11. Conclusions and Future Studies

In light of recent research, lactate has emerged as an important metabolite in the brain. These new findings have altered the context in which we look at the brain and its functioning. Importantly, given that metabolic dysfunction is tightly linked to neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, further studies measuring aerobic glycolysis in vivo are warranted. Considering the relationship between aerobic glycolysis in the AD brain, as well as the observed protective effect of aerobic glycolysis against A  in vitro, it would be valuable to perform a longitudinal study of aerobic glycolysis in normal and AD patients using FDG-PET to determine if elevated or sustained aerobic glycolysis correlates with better clinical outcome. Recent results from the dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s network (DIAN) study showed that A accumulation preceded detectable atrophy and hypometabolism by decades [142, 143]. Interestingly, the caudate nucleus had very high levels of A deposition but did not exhibit hypometabolism or neuronal loss throughout the course of disease progression [143]. Assuming that the caudate nucleus is resistant to the toxic effects of AD it would be valuable to determine if aerobic glycolysis is also elevated in this brain region.

A significant proportion of elderly individuals exhibit sufficient plaque accumulation warranting a neuropathology-based classification as probable AD yet are normal by cognitive assessments [144, 145]. Assuming A accumulation promotes neurotoxicity and dementia, then increased CNS aerobic glycolysis may arise as a protective mechanism to enable these individuals to evade cognitive decline. Examining the brains of nondemented individuals with AD neuropathology (NDAN) may shed light on these neuroprotective mechanisms. Given the protective nature of LDHA and PDK1 in vitro, it would be of interest to examine the expression patterns of these enzymes in NDAN individuals. Moreover, transgenic (tg) AD mice also may provide an interesting model for uncovering neuroprotective mechanisms that arise from the constitutive and progressive production of Aβ in the CNS. Although tg-AD mice (APP/PS1) have high plaque loads by 6 months of age, most mice exhibit little to no nerve cell loss and are cognitively indistinguishable from nontransgenic mice, whereas synaptic dysfunction and neurotoxicity occurs in tg-AD mice older than 6 months [146, 147]. Thus young tg-AD mice may offer a model of A resistance. Interestingly, we have observed elevated expression of PDK1 in cortical extracts from young (3-month-old) tg-AD mice, which may be indicative of a compensatory protective mechanism (unpublished observations). Creation of tg mice expressing enzymes that regulate aerobic glycolysis in the CNS, crossed to tg-AD mice, may help further define the role of this metabolism in preventing cognitive decline in older mice. These studies would provide a strong rationale for identifying compounds which activate aerobic glycolysis and enhance CNS function. The wealth of new research demonstrating the importance of aerobic glycolysis in the brain holds promise that activation of this form of metabolism may offer a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation (Grant no. 11103). Financial support for J. Newington was provided by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship and the Alzheimer’s Society of London and Middlesex.

References

D. Attwell and S. B. Laughlin, “An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1133–1145, 2001.

G. A. Brooks, “Lactate: glycolytic end product and oxidative substrate during sustained exercise in mammals—the ‘lactate shuttle’,” in Circulation, Respiration, and Metabolism: Current Comparative Approaches, R. Gilles, Ed., p. 208, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1985.

Y. Itoh, T. Esaki, K. Shimoji et al., “Dichloroacetate effects on glucose and lactate oxidation by neurons and astroglia in vitro and on glucose utilization by brain in vivo,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 4879–4884, 2003.

A. K. Bouzier-Sore, P. Voisin, V. Bouchaud, E. Bezancon, J. M. Franconi, and L. Pellerin, “Competition between glucose and lactate as oxidative energy substrates in both neurons and astrocytes: a comparative NMR study,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1687–1694, 2006.

L. Sokoloff, M. Reivich, C. Kennedy et al., “The [14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: theory, procedure, and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 897–916, 1977.

P. T. Fox and M. E. Raichle, “Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1140–1144, 1986.

P. T. Fox, M. E. Raichle, M. A. Mintun, and C. Dence, “Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity,” Science, vol. 241, no. 4864, pp. 462–464, 1988.

S. N. Vaishnavi, A. G. Vlassenko, M. M. Rundle, A. Z. Snyder, M. A. Mintun, and M. E. Raichle, “Regional aerobic glycolysis in the human brain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 41, pp. 17757–17762, 2010.

A. S. Urrila, A. Hakkarainen, S. Heikkinen et al., “Stimulus-induced brain lactate: effects of aging and prolonged wakefulness,” Journal of Sleep Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2004.

A. L. Lin, P. T. Fox, J. Hardies, T. Q. Duong, and J. H. Gao, “Nonlinear coupling between cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and ATP production in human visual cortex,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 18, pp. 8446–8451, 2010.

R. J. Maddock, M. H. Buonocore, S. P. Lavoie et al., “Brain lactate responses during visual stimulation in fasting and hyperglycemic subjects: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study at 1.5 Tesla,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2006.

C. P. Chih, J. He, T. S. Sly, and E. L. Roberts Jr., “Comparison of glucose and lactate as substrates during NMDA-induced activation of hippocampal slices,” Brain Research, vol. 893, no. 1-2, pp. 143–154, 2001.

G. A. Dienel and L. Hertz, “Glucose and lactate metabolism during brain activation,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 824–838, 2001.

C. P. Chih and E. L. Roberts Jr., “Energy substrates for neurons during neural activity: a critical review of the astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle hypothesis,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1263–1281, 2003.

J. Prichard, D. Rothman, E. Novotny et al., “Lactate rise detected by 1H NMR in human visual cortex during physiologic stimulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 13, pp. 5829–5831, 1991.

L. Pellerin and P. J. Magistretti, “Glutamate uptake into astrocytes stimulates aerobic glycolysis: a mechanism coupling neuronal activity to glucose utilization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 22, pp. 10625–10629, 1994.

P. G. Bittar, Y. Charnay, L. Pellerin, C. Bouras, and P. J. Magistretti, “Selective distribution of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in neurons and astrocytes of human brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1079–1089, 1996.

P. J. Magistretti and L. Pellerin, “Cellular mechanisms of brain energy metabolism: relevance to functional brain imaging and to neurodegenerative disorders,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 777, pp. 380–387, 1996.

M. Nedergaard, B. Ransom, and S. A. Goldman, “New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 523–530, 2003.

M. Bélanger and P. J. Magistretti, “The role of astroglia in neuroprotection,” Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 281–296, 2009.

K. Kacem, P. Lacombe, J. Seylaz, and G. Bonvento, “Structural organization of the perivascular astrocyte endfeet and their relationship with the endothelial glucose transporter: a confocal microscopy study,” Glia, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 1998.

S. Morgello, R. R. Uson, E. J. Schwartz, and R. S. Haber, “The human blood-brain barrier glucose transporter (GLUT1) is a glucose transporter of gray matter astrocytes,” Glia, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 43–54, 1995.

M. Haber, L. Zhou, and K. K. Murai, “Cooperative astrocyte and dendritic spine dynamics at hippocampal excitatory synapses,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 8881–8891, 2006.

P. J. Magistretti, “Neuron-glia metabolic coupling and plasticity,” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 209, part 12, pp. 2304–2311, 2006.

A. M. Brown, S. B. Tekkok, and B. R. Ransom, “Energy transfer from astrocytes to axons: the role of CNS glycogen,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 529–536, 2004.

D. Vilchez, S. Ros, D. Cifuentes et al., “Mechanism suppressing glycogen synthesis in neurons and its demise in progressive myoclonus epilepsy,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1407–1413, 2007.

L. A. Newman, D. L. Korol, and P. E. Gold, “Lactate produced by glycogenolysis in astrocytes regulates memory processing,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 12, Article ID e28427, 2011.

H. R. Zielke, C. L. Zielke, and P. J. Baab, “Direct measurement of oxidative metabolism in the living brain by microdialysis: a review,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2009.

L. Pellerin and P. J. Magistretti, “Sweet sixteen for ANLS,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1152–1166, 2012.

C. L. Poitry-Yamate, S. Poitry, and M. Tsacopoulos, “Lactate released by Muller glial cells is metabolized by photoreceptors from mammalian retina,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 5179–5191, 1995.

N. R. Sibson, J. Shen, G. F. Mason, D. L. Rothman, K. L. Behar, and R. G. Shulman, “Functional energy metabolism: in vivo 13C-NMR spectroscopy evidence for coupling of cerebral glucose consumption and glutamatergic neuronal activity,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 4-5, pp. 321–330, 1998.

B. Voutsinos-Porche, G. Bonvento, K. Tanaka et al., “Glial glutamate transporters mediate a functional metabolic crosstalk between neurons and astrocytes in the mouse developing cortex,” Neuron, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 275–286, 2003.

C. A. Stuart, I. R. Ross, M. E. A. Howell et al., “Brain glucose transporter (Glut3) haploinsufficiency does not impair mouse brain glucose uptake,” Brain Research, vol. 1384, pp. 15–22, 2011.

D. Wang, J. M. Pascual, H. Yang et al., “A mouse model for Glut-1 haploinsufficiency,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1169–1179, 2006.

J. Chuquet, P. Quilichini, E. A. Nimchinsky, and G. Buzsáki, “Predominant enhancement of glucose uptake in astrocytes versus neurons during activation of the somatosensory cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 45, pp. 15298–15303, 2010.

R. L. Leino, D. Z. Gerhart, A. M. van Bueren, A. L. McCall, and L. R. Drewes, “Ultrastructural localization of GLUT 1 and GLUT 3 glucose transporters in rat brain,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 617–626, 1997.

S. J. Vannucci, F. Maher, and I. A. Simpson, “Glucose transporter proteins in brain: delivery of glucose to neurons and glia,” Glia, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 2–21, 1997.

A. Schousboe, N. Westergaard, H. S. Waagepetersen, O. M. Larsson, I. J. Bakken, and U. Sonnewald, “Trafficking between glia and neurons of TCA cycle intermediates and related metabolites,” Glia, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 99–105, 1997.

H. S. Waagepetersen, U. Sonnewald, O. M. Larsson, and A. Schousboe, “A possible role of alanine for ammonia transfer between astrocytes and glutamatergic neurons,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 471–479, 2000.

B. Hassel and A. Brathe, “Cerebral metabolism of lactate in vivo: evidence for neuronal pyruvate carboxylation,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 327–336, 2000.

H. Qu, A. Håberg, O. Haraldseth, G. Unsgård, and U. Sonnewald, “13C MR spectroscopy study of lactate as substrate for rat brain,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 5-6, pp. 429–436, 2000.

N. Rouach, A. Koulakoff, V. Abudara, K. Willecke, and C. Giaume, “Astroglial metabolic networks sustain hippocampal synaptic transmission,” Science, vol. 322, no. 5907, pp. 1551–1555, 2008.

L. Pellerin, G. Pellegri, P. G. Bittar et al., “Evidence supporting the existence of an activity-dependent astrocyte-neuron lactate shuttle,” Developmental Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 4-5, pp. 291–299, 1998.

M. G. Larrabee, “Lactate metabolism and its effects on glucose metabolism in an excised neural tissue,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1734–1741, 1995.

C. Véga, C. L. Poitry-Yamate, P. Jirounek, M. Tsacopoulos, and J. A. Coles, “Lactate is released and taken up by isolated rabbit vagus nerve during aerobic metabolism,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 1998.

D. Smith, A. Pernet, W. A. Hallett, E. Bingham, P. K. Marsden, and S. A. Amiel, “Lactate: a preferred fuel for human brain metabolism in vivo,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 23, pp. 658–664, 2003.

E. K. Ainscow, S. Mirshamsi, T. Tang, M. L. J. Ashford, and G. A. Rutter, “Dynamic imaging of free cytosolic ATP concentration during fuel sensing by rat hypothalamic neurones: evidence for ATP-independent control of ATP-sensitive K⁺ channels,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 544, no. 2, pp. 429–445, 2002.

G. A. Dienel, “Brain lactate metabolism: the discoveries and the controversies,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1107–1138, 2012.

S. Passarella, L. de Bari, D. Valenti, R. Pizzuto, G. Paventi, and A. Atlante, “Mitochondria and l-lactate metabolism,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 25-26, pp. 3569–3576, 2008.

G. A. Brooks, H. Dubouchaud, M. Brown, J. P. Sicurello, and C. Eric Butz, “Role of mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase and lactate oxidation in the intracellular lactate shuttle,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1129–1134, 1999.

T. Hashimoto, R. Hussien, and G. A. Brooks, “Colocalization of MCT1, CD147, and LDH in mitochondrial inner membrane of L6 muscle cells: evidence of a mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 290, no. 6, pp. E1237–E1244, 2006.

K. Sahlin, M. Fernström, M. Svensson, and M. Tonkonogi, “No evidence of an intracellular lactate shuttle in rat skeletal muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 541, no. 2, pp. 569–574, 2002.

Y. Yoshida, G. P. Holloway, V. Ljubicic et al., “Negligible direct lactate oxidation in subsarcolemmal and intermyofibrillar mitochondria obtained from red and white rat skeletal muscle,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 582, no. 3, pp. 1317–1335, 2007.

A. Atlante, L. de Bari, A. Bobba, E. Marra, and S. Passarella, “Transport and metabolism of l-lactate occur in mitochondria from cerebellar granule cells and are modified in cells undergoing low potassium dependent apoptosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1767, no. 11, pp. 1285–1299, 2007.

J. Lemire, R. J. Mailloux, and V. D. Appanna, “Mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase is involved in oxidative-energy metabolism in human astrocytoma cells (CCF-STTG1),” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 2, Article ID e1550, 2008.

T. Hashimoto, R. Hussien, H. S. Cho, D. Kaufer, and G. A. Brooks, “Evidence for the mitochondrial lactate oxidation complex in rat neurons: demonstration of an essential component of brain lactate shuttles,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 8, Article ID e2915, 2008.

A. Schurr and R. S. Payne, “Lactate, not pyruvate, is neuronal aerobic glycolysis end product: an in vitro electrophysiological study,” Neuroscience, vol. 147, no. 3, pp. 613–619, 2007.

A. Schurr, “Lactate: the ultimate cerebral oxidative energy substrate,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 142–152, 2006.

H. Takanaga and W. B. Frommer, “Facilitative plasma membrane transporters function during ER transit,” FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 2849–2858, 2010.

E. R. Kandel, “The molecular biology of memory storage: a dialogue between genes and synapses,” Science, vol. 294, no. 5544, pp. 1030–1038, 2001.

C. M. Alberini, “Transcription factors in long-term memory and synaptic plasticity,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 121–145, 2009.

A. J. Silva, J. H. Kogan, P. W. Frankland, and S. Kida, “CREB and memory,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 21, pp. 127–148, 1998.

A. Suzuki, S. A. Stern, O. Bozdagi et al., “Astrocyte-neuron lactate transport is required for long-term memory formation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 810–823, 2011.

M. E. Gibbs, D. G. Anderson, and L. Hertz, “Inhibition of glycogenolysis in astrocytes interrupts memory consolidation in young chickens,” Glia, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 214–222, 2006.

A. Rafiki, J. L. Boulland, A. P. Halestrap, O. P. Ottersen, and L. Bergersen, “Highly differential expression of the monocarboxylate transporters MCT2 and MCT4 in the developing rat brain,” Neuroscience, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 677–688, 2003.

R. Debernardi, K. Pierre, S. Lengacher, P. J. Magistretti, and L. Pellerin, “Cell-specific expression pattern of monocarboxylate transporters in astrocytes and neurons observed in different mouse brain cortical cell cultures,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 141–155, 2003.

L. Pellerin, L. H. Bergersen, A. P. Halestrap, and K. Pierre, “Cellular and subcellular distribution of monocarboxylate transporters in cultured brain cells and in the adult brain,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 79, no. 1-2, pp. 55–64, 2005.

C. L. Masters, G. Simms, N. A. Weinman, G. Multhaup, B. L. McDonald, and K. Beyreuther, “Amyloid plaque core protein in Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 4245–4249, 1985.

C. L. Masters, G. Multhaup, G. Simms, J. Pottgiesser, R. N. Martins, and K. Beyreuther, “Neuronal origin of a cerebral amyloid: neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease contain the same protein as the amyloid of plaque cores and blood vessels,” EMBO Journal, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2757–2763, 1985.

D. J. Selkoe, “The cell biology β-amyloid precursor protein and presenilin in Alzheimer's disease,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 447–453, 1998.

J. Hardy, “Amyloid, the presenilins and Alzheimer's disease,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 154–159, 1997.

J. A. Hardy and G. A. Higgins, “Alzheimer's disease: the amyloid cascade hypothesis,” Science, vol. 256, no. 5054, pp. 184–185, 1992.

Y. Sagara, R. Dargusch, F. G. Klier, D. Schubert, and C. Behl, “Increased antioxidant enzyme activity in amyloid β protein-resistant cells,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 497–505, 1996.

C. Behl, J. B. Davis, R. Lesley, and D. Schubert, “Hydrogen peroxide mediates amyloid β protein toxicity,” Cell, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 817–827, 1994.

L. Tillement, L. Lecanu, and V. Papadopoulos, “Alzheimer's disease: effects of β-amyloid on mitochondria,” Mitochondrion, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2011.

D. A. Butterfield, T. Reed, S. F. Newman, and R. Sultana, “Roles of amyloid β-peptide-associated oxidative stress and brain protein modifications in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 658–677, 2007.

W. R. Markesbery, “Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer's disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 1997.

C. Behl, “Amyloid β-protein toxicity and oxidative stress in Alzheimer's disease,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. 471–480, 1997.

C. S. Casley, L. Canevari, J. M. Land, J. B. Clark, and M. A. Sharpe, “β-amyloid inhibits integrated mitochondrial respiration and key enzyme activities,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2002.

C. Caspersen, N. Wang, J. Yao et al., “Mitochondrial Aβ: a potential focal point for neuronal metabolic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease,” FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 14, pp. 2040–2041, 2005.

P. Fernández-Vizarra, A. P. Fernández, S. Castro-Blanco et al., “Intra- and extracellular Aβ and PHF in clinically evaluated cases of Alzheimer's disease,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 823–844, 2004.

J. W. Lustbader, M. Cirilli, C. Lin et al., “ABAD directly links Aβ to mitochondrial toxicity in Alzheimer's disease,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5669, pp. 448–452, 2004.

M. Manczak, T. S. Anekonda, E. Henson, B. S. Park, J. Quinn, and P. H. Reddy, “Mitochondria are a direct site of A β accumulation in Alzheimer's disease neurons: implications for free radical generation and oxidative damage in disease progression,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 1437–1449, 2006.

J. Yao, H. Du, S. Yan et al., “Inhibition of amyloid-β(Aβ) peptide-binding alcohol dehydrogenase-Aβ interaction reduces Aβ accumulation and improves mitochondrial function in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 2313–2320, 2011.

L. F. Hernandez-Zimbron, J. Luna-Munoz, R. Mena et al., “Amyloid-β peptide binds to cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e42344, 2012.

W. K. Hong, E. H. Han, D. G. Kim, J. Y. Ahn, J. S. Park, and B. G. Han, “Amyloid-beta-peptide reduces the expression level of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunits,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1483–1488, 2007.

G. E. Gibson, K. F. R. Sheu, and J. P. Blass, “Abnormalities of mitochondrial enzymes in Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 105, no. 8-9, pp. 855–870, 1998.

W. S. Liang, E. M. Reiman, J. Valla et al., “Alzheimer's disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 4441–4446, 2008.

W. M. Brooks, P. J. Lynch, C. C. Ingle et al., “Gene expression profiles of metabolic enzyme transcripts in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 1127, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2007.

J. T. Newington, A. Pitts, A. Chien, R. Arseneault, D. Schubert, and R. C. Cumming, “Amyloid beta resistance in nerve cell lines is mediated by the warburg effect,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 4, Article ID e19191, 2011.

T. Soucek, R. Cumming, R. Dargusch, P. Maher, and D. Schubert, “The regulation of glucose metabolism by HIF-1 mediates a neuroprotective response to amyloid β peptide,” Neuron, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 43–56, 2003.

I. Papandreou, R. A. Cairns, L. Fontana, A. L. Lim, and N. C. Denko, “HIF-1 mediates adaptation to hypoxia by actively downregulating mitochondrial oxygen consumption,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 187–197, 2006.

G. L. Semenza, “Transcriptional regulation by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 molecular mechanisms of oxygen homeostasis,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 151–157, 1996.

G. L. Semenza, B. H. Jiang, S. W. Leung et al., “Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase a gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 51, pp. 32529–32537, 1996.

J. W. Kim, I. Tchernyshyov, G. L. Semenza, and C. V. Dang, “HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 177–185, 2006.

W. H. Koppenol, P. L. Bounds, and C. V. Dang, “Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 11, pp. 325–337, 2011.

J. T. Newington, T. Rappon, S. Albers, D. Y. Wong, R. J. Rylett, and R. C. Cumming, “Overexpression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 and lactate dehydrogenase A in nerve cells confers resistance to amyloid beta and other toxins by decreasing mitochondrial respiration and ROS production,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 44, pp. 37245–37258, 2012.

M. Zilberter, A. Ivanov, S. Ziyatdinova et al., “Dietary energy substrates reverse early neuronal hyperactivity in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 157–171, 2013.

M. Bigl, M. K. Brückner, T. Arendt, V. Bigl, and K. Eschrich, “Activities of key glycolytic enzymes in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 106, no. 5-6, pp. 499–511, 1999.

E. K. Perry, R. H. Perry, and B. E. Tomlinson, “Coenzyme A-acetylating enzymes in Alzheimer's disease: possible cholinergic “compartment” of pyruvate dehydrogenase,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 105–110, 1980.

K. F. R. Sheu, Y. T. Kim, J. P. Blass, and M. E. Weksler, “An immunochemical study of the pyruvate dehydrogenase deficit in Alzheimer's disease brain,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 444–449, 1985.

S. Sorbi, E. D. Bird, and J. P. Blass, “Decreased pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity in Huntington and Alzheimer brain,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 1983.

R. Mielke, J. Kessler, B. Szelies, K. Herholz, K. Wienhard, and W. D. Heiss, “Normal and pathological aging—findings of positron-emission-tomography,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 105, no. 8-9, pp. 821–837, 1998.

W. D. Heiss, B. Szelies, J. Kessler, and K. Herholz, “Abnormalities of energy metabolism in Alzheimer's disease studied with PET,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 640, pp. 65–71, 1991.

L. Mosconi, “Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 486–510, 2005.

A. G. Vlassenko, S. N. Vaishnavi, L. Couture et al., “Spatial correlation between brain aerobic glycolysis and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 41, pp. 17763–17767, 2010.

W. J. Powers, J. L. Rosenbaum, C. S. Dence, J. Markham, and T. O. Videen, “Cerebral glucose transport and metabolism in preterm human infants,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 18, pp. 632–638, 1998.

S. Cunnane, S. Nugent, M. Roy et al., “Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer's disease,” Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2011.

R. La Joie, A. Perrotin, L. Barre et al., “Region-specific hierarchy between atrophy, hypometabolism, and β-amyloid (Aβ) load in Alzheimer's disease dementia,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 46, pp. 16265–16273, 2012.

W. J. Jagust, S. M. Landau, and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, “Apolipoprotein E, not fibrillar β-amyloid, reduces cerebral glucose metabolism in normal aging,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 50, pp. 18227–18233, 2012.

R. W. Mahley and Y. Huang, “Apolipoprotein e sets the stage: response to injury triggers neuropathology,” Neuron, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 871–885, 2012.

S. Chang, T. R. Ma, R. D. Miranda, M. E. Balestra, R. W. Mahley, and Y. Huang, “Lipid- and receptor-binding regions of apolipoprotein E4 fragments act in concert to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and neurotoxicity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 51, pp. 18694–18699, 2005.

T. Nakamura, A. Watanabe, T. Fujino, T. Hosono, and M. Michikawa, “Apolipoprotein E4 (1-272) fragment is associated with mitochondrial proteins and affects mitochondrial function in neuronal cells,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 4, no. 1, article 35, 2009.

J. A. Driver, A. Beiser, R. Au et al., “Inverse association between cancer and Alzheimer's disease: results from the framingham heart study,” The British Medical Journal, vol. 344, Article ID e1442, 2012.

A. Bajaj, J. A. Driver, and E. S. Schernhammer, “Parkinson's disease and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 697–707, 2010.

J. A. Driver, G. Logroscino, J. E. Buring, J. M. Gaziano, and T. Kurth, “A prospective cohort study of cancer incidence following the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1260–1265, 2007.

C. Berthet, H. Lei, J. Thevenet, R. Gruetter, P. J. Magistretti, and L. Hirt, “Neuroprotective role of lactate after cerebral ischemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 1780–1789, 2009.

C. Berthet, X. Castillo, P. J. Magistretti, and L. Hirt, “New evidence of neuroprotection by lactate after transient focal cerebral ischaemia: extended benefit after intracerebroventricular injection and efficacy of intravenous administration,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 34, no. 5-6, pp. 329–335, 2012.

M. T. Wyss, R. Jolivet, A. Buck, P. J. Magistretti, and B. Weber, “In vivo evidence for lactate as a neuronal energy source,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 20, pp. 7477–7485, 2011.

M. Coco, S. Caggia, G. Musumeci et al., “Sodium L-lactate differently affects brain-derived neurothrophic factor, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and heat shock protein 70 kDa production in human astrocytes and SH-SY5Y cultures,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 313–320, 2013.

P. Bekinschtein, M. Cammarota, C. Katche et al., “BDNF is essential to promote persistence of long-term memory storage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 2711–2716, 2008.

C. J. de Saedeleer, T. Copetti, P. E. Porporato, J. Verrax, O. Feron, and P. Sonveaux, “Lactate activates HIF-1 in oxidative but not in Warburg-phenotype human tumor cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e46571, 2012.

T. Hashimoto, R. Hussien, S. Oommen, K. Gohil, and G. A. Brooks, “Lactate sensitive transcription factor network in L6 cells: activation of MCT1 and mitochondrial biogenesis,” FASEB Journal, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 2602–2612, 2007.

S. Yamanishi, K. Katsumura, T. Kobayashi, and D. G. Puro, “Extracellular lactate as a dynamic vasoactive signal in the rat retinal microvasculature,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. H925–H934, 2006.

G. R. J. Gordon, H. B. Choi, R. L. Rungta, G. C. R. Ellis-Davies, and B. A. MacVicar, “Brain metabolism dictates the polarity of astrocyte control over arterioles,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7223, pp. 745–750, 2008.

M. Overgaard, P. Rasmussen, A. M. Bohm et al., “Hypoxia and exercise provoke both lactate release and lactate oxidation by the human brain,” FASEB Journal, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 3012–3020, 2012.

K. Ide, I. K. Schmalbruch, B. Quistorff, A. Horn, and N. H. Secher, “Lactate, glucose and O₂ uptake in human brain during recovery from maximal exercise,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 522, no. 1, pp. 159–164, 2000.

P. Rasmussen, M. T. Wyss, and C. Lundby, “Cerebral glucose and lactate consumption during cerebral activation by physical activity in humans,” FASEB Journal, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2865–2873, 2011.

B. Quistorff, N. H. Secher, and J. J. Van Lieshout, “Lactate fuels the human brain during exercise,” FASEB Journal, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3443–3449, 2008.

G. van Hall, M. Strømstad, P. Rasmussen et al., “Blood lactate is an important energy source for the human brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1121–1129, 2009.

M. Roig, K. Skriver, J. Lundbye-Jensen, B. Kiens, and J. B. Nielsen, “A single bout of exercise improves motor memory,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e44594, 2012.

M. Maesako, K. Uemura, M. Kubota et al., “Exercise is more effective than diet control in preventing high fat diet-induced β-amyloid deposition and memory deficit in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, pp. 23024–23033, 2012.

A. S. Buchman, P. A. Boyle, L. Yu, R. C. Shah, R. S. Wilson, and D. A. Bennett, “Total daily physical activity and the risk of AD and cognitive decline in older adults,” Neurology, vol. 79, no. 10, p. 1071, 2012.

N. Scarmeas, J. A. Luchsinger, N. Schupf et al., “Physical activity, diet, and risk of Alzheimer disease,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 6, pp. 627–637, 2009.

L. T. Ferris, J. S. Williams, and C. L. Shen, “The effect of acute exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and cognitive function,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 728–734, 2007.

J. Kalman, A. Palotas, N. Bodi et al., “Lactate infusion fails to improve semantic categorization in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 533–539, 2005.

C. A. Manning, M. E. Ragozzino, and P. E. Gold, “Glucose enhancement of memory in patients with probable senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 523–528, 1993.

X. Wang, W. Zheng, J. W. Xie et al., “Insulin deficiency exacerbates cerebral amyloidosis and behavioral deficits in an Alzheimer transgenic mouse model,” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 5, no. 1, article 46, 2010.

J. Janson, T. Laedtke, J. E. Parisi, P. O'Brien, R. C. Petersen, and P. C. Butler, “Increased risk of type 2 diabetes in Alzheimer disease,” Diabetes, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 474–481, 2004.

G. J. Biessels, L. J. Kappelle, and Utrecht Diabetic Encephalopathy Study Group, “Increased risk of Alzheimer's disease in type II diabetes: insulin resistance of the brain or insulin-induced amyloid pathology?” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 33, part 5, pp. 1041–1044, 2005.

R. A. Whitmer, “Type 2 diabetes and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia,” Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 373–380, 2007.

R. J. Bateman, C. Xiong, T. L. Benzinger et al., “Clinical and biomarker changes in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, pp. 795–804, 2012.

T. L. Benzinger, “Elevated PIB precedes dementia in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease: PIB, FDG and atrophy in the DIAN cohort,” Alzheimer's and Dementia, vol. 8, no. 4, article P57, 2012.

C. Bouras, P. R. Hof, P. Giannakopoulos, J. P. Michel, and J. H. Morrison, “Regional distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in the cerebral cortex of elderly patients: a quantitative evaluation of a one-year autopsy population from a geriatric hospital,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 138–150, 1994.

J. L. Price and J. C. Morris, “Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 358–368, 1999.

A. Savonenko, G. M. Xu, T. Melnikova et al., “Episodic-like memory deficits in the APPswe/PS1dE9 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: relationships to β-amyloid deposition and neurotransmitter abnormalities,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 602–617, 2005.

T. Spires-Jones and S. Knafo, “Spines, plasticity, and cognition in Alzheimer's model mice,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2012, Article ID 319836, 10 pages, 2012.