Journal of Nanomaterials

Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 964391, 6 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/964391

Research Article

Facile Synthesis of Graphene/ZnO Composite as an Anode with Enhanced Performance for Lithium Ion Batteries

Yanhong Zhao,1,2 Gang Chen,¹ and Yu Wang¹

¹Department of Chemistry, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

²College of Enviromental and Chemical Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, China

Received 19 May 2014; Revised 20 July 2014; Accepted 11 August 2014; Published 2 September 2014

Academic Editor: Xilin Chen

Copyright © 2014 Yanhong Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Graphene/ZnO composites with different contents of ZnO have been successfully synthesized via a liquid phase route. The structure, morphology, and electrochemical performances of the composites are investigated by XRD, Raman, SEM, TEM, AFM, and electrochemical measurement. The results reveal that ZnO nanoparticles wedged on the surface of the graphene nanosheets. The initial capacity of graphene/ZnO (1 : 1) reached 1155.27 mAh g⁻¹, which increased 162.87 mAh g⁻¹ compared with the initial capacity of graphene. This could be attributed to the unique structure of the prepared composite and synergies of graphene and ZnO in the lithium ion storage.

1. Introduction

Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are essential components for hand-held electronic devices, electrical vehicles, and so forth [1]. In order to meet the demand of the practical applications, the electrode materials of LIBs should have high reversible capacity, good cycling performance, fine conductivity, and large energy volume density [2]. Graphene is widely used as electrode material because of its excellent electrical conductivity, large specific surface area, and flexibility. But graphene could not be used as anode material due to the high irreversible capacity and the low first coulombic efficiency [3–6]. This may be related to its stacking and large specific surface. The stacking will decrease the storage space of lithium ion. The large specific surface could lead to the more probability to produce solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) because of the reaction between lithium ion and electrolyte on the graphene sheets surface, which increases the irreversible capacity of graphene as the anode. Some metal oxides have been introduced for improving these shortcomings of graphene, such as Co₃O₄ [7] and SnO₂ [8]. The metal oxide nanoparticles can enter the layers of graphene sheets and prevent graphene sheets (GNS) from stacking together. Also the GNS can prevent the aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles, which makes a significant contribution to improving the conductivity of the composite. Compared to these materials, ZnO has a theoretical capacity of 978 mAh g⁻¹ [9], which makes it possible for the application as an anode material for lithium ion batteries, while ZnO [10, 11] is rarely studied in terms of lithium ion battery due to severe expansion and contraction during charge and discharge and low electrical conductivity [12]. So graphene and ZnO are composited together, which will restrain the reuniting of graphene and alleviating the volume effect of ZnO.

Based on the above analysis, graphene/ZnO composites with different percentages of ZnO have been successfully synthesized by a facile liquid phase method. The structure and morphology of the composites are investigated by XRD, Raman, SEM, TEM, and AFM. Electrochemical performance of composites (used as reversible anode materials for lithium ion batteries) is investigated. The composite has higher reversible capacity and coulombic efficiency than graphene, which recommends it as a promising alternative anode material used for high energy lithium ion batteries.

2. Material and Methods

First, graphene oxide (GO) was prepared by modified Hummers’ method [13]. Second, GO was exfoliated through ultrasonication process. The 0.1 g graphene oxide was added to 10 mL DI water and solution underwent sonication for 90 min. In third step, zinc acetate solution was slowly added into GO solution as 0.5 : 1, 1 : 1, and 2 : 1 and the product after drying was heated at 300°C for 6 h to remove oxide functional groups and residual water molecules. For the comparative study of the electrochemical performance, pure ZnO and reduced graphene oxide were also prepared.

Product was characterized using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D-8 Advance), Raman spectroscopy (JY HR-800, 532 nm), atomic force microscope (AFM, Dimension Icon), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FESEM, Quanta 200F, FEI), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010FEF, 200 kV).

Electrochemical performances of graphene, ZnO, and graphene/ZnO composites were investigated with coin-type cells (CR2025). The working electrodes were prepared by a slurry (80 wt% active material, 10 wt% polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) in N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), and 10 wt% carbon black) coating procedure. Test cells were assembled in an argon-filled glove box with the metallic lithium foil as the reference and counter electrodes. The electrolyte was 1.0 mol dm⁻³ LiPF₆ in a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC). The electrochemical characterizations were measured by charging and discharging in the range of 0.01–3.0 V (versus Li/Li⁺) at room temperature using a battery test system (LAND, Wuhan Jinnuo Electronics Ltd.). AC impedance measurement was carried out using a CHI604C (Shanghai Huachen Electronics Ltd.) electrochemical working station in the 100 KHz to 10 mHz frequency range.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD patterns of graphite, graphene oxide (GO), and graphene are shown in Figure 1(a). The little patterns in Figure 1(a) indicate graphene (GN) was completely reduced from GO. The diffraction peak of GN at 26.6° which appeared with low intensity compared with graphite indicates that the reduced graphene sheets are less compact and more disorderly stacked. Figure 1(b) shows Raman spectrum of graphite and graphene. Two main peaks (D and G) are observed in Raman spectra. The D band is assigned to phonon of sp³ carbon atoms of disordered graphite, and the G band is related to the in-plane vibration of sp² carbon atom [14, 15]. The D/G intensity ratio () of graphene is larger than graphite. The significant increase of D/G intensity ratio is due to the decrease in the size of the in-plane sp² domains, as well as an increase in the edge planes. Figure 1(c) shows the XRD patterns of graphene/ZnO composite and standard ZnO. The diffraction peaks of composites are indexed well to ZnO (JCPDS no. 36-1451) without any impurities [16], and the 002 peak of graphene is still at 26.6°. This result indicates that high crystallinity and uniformity of ZnO or graphene are obtained and the crystal structure of ZnO and graphene does not change.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1: XRD pattern of (a) graphite, graphene oxide, and graphene, (b) graphene/ZnO composite and Raman spectrum of graphene sheets and graphite (c).

The detailed morphologies of graphene and graphene/ZnO can be known by TEM images, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 2(a) exhibits that graphene has a flat lamellar structure. Such structure could make graphene have large surface and increase the lithium storage location. On the other hand, the wrinkle can be seen which could form some little space. That could keep in the storage of lithium ion. The few layers of graphene could be seen in the HRTEM image of Figure 2(c). Figure 2(e) is the AFM images of the graphene sheets. Figure 2(f) is the three-dimensional image of Figure 2(e). The results of HRTEM and AFM show that the thickness of the prepared graphene is 3 nm. Because the single layer is 0.335 nm, the synthesized graphene has about 8 layers. Figure 2(b) shows that ZnO nanoparticles uniformly wedge in flat graphene nanosheets; the average size of ZnO nanoparticles is about 20–50 nm. The graphene nanosheets and ZnO nanoparticles closely contact with each other. Flat sheet of graphene and close contact of graphene and ZnO are beneficial to the lithium ion diffusion and electron transfer. Furthermore, the graphene sheet nanostructure is staggered and stacked together to form large conductive network.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 2: TEM image of graphene sheets (a, c), graphene/ZnO (b, d), and AFM image of graphene sheets with height profile (e) and 3D (f).

In order to confirm that the composite could have enhanced electrochemical performance, the charge/discharge test, cyclic performances, and Nyquist plots were carried out, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) shows that the initial discharge and charge capacity of graphene/ZnO (1 : 0.5, 1 : 1, and 1 : 2) and graphene at the rate of 100 mA g⁻¹ are 1028.8 and 582.3 mAh g⁻¹, 1155.27 and 650.79 mAh g⁻¹, 737.9 and 431.55 mAh g⁻¹, 992.4 and 537.9 mAh g⁻¹, respectively. The capacity of graphene is more than theoretical capacity (744 mAh g⁻¹) because of its wrinkle and stacking. The reformation space could store more lithium ion. The composite materials with mass rate of 1 : 0.5 and 1 : 1 have high capacity exceeding theoretical capacities of graphene or ZnO. The capacity of graphene/ZnO is higher than graphene or ZnO, which is attributed to the novel structure of the composite. ZnO particles are wedged in the surface of the flat graphene and support the large flat sheet of graphene, which reduce graphene overlapping and retain the lithium storage space. In addition, ZnO nanoparticles uniformly disperse on the surface of graphene sheets; the volume expansion of ZnO was limited by the flexible graphene sheets. So the combination of graphene and ZnO can effectively prevent the aggregation of ZnO nanoparticles and the restacking of graphene. All these ensure that the electronic transfer network is unobstructed, integrated and stable. So graphene/ZnO composite will have the advanced capacity more than the single graphene or ZnO.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: The first discharge/charge curves for graphene and graphene/ZnO composite (a), cycle performance of graphene sheets, graphene/ZnO, and pure ZnO at 100 mA g⁻¹ (b), EIS spectra of graphene/ZnO and graphene after 2nd cycle discharge/charge (c).

In Figure 3(b), the initial charge capacity of graphene/ZnO (1 : 1) is 650.79 mAh g⁻¹, while the graphene electrode shows an initial charge capacity of 537.9 mAh g⁻¹. This is because of the novel structure of the composite. As can be seen in Figure 2(b), ZnO was wedged in the surface of graphene, which not only supported the flat sheet of graphene, but also occupied the part of active position. In the place, the lithium ion cannot react with electrolyte, so the irreversible amount of lithium ion was reduced. As can be seen in Figure 3(b), the graphene exhibited a specific capacity of 357 mAh g⁻¹, and the graphene/ZnO composite was 401 mAh g⁻¹. However, ZnO presented a very poor cycling performance because its constructive structure collapsed with volume expansion and contraction in charge and discharge. So ZnO wedged in the graphene which enhanced the reversible capacity of the material.

Figure 3(c) depicts the Nyquist plots of graphene and graphene/ZnO. The semicircle in the middle frequency range indicates the charge transfer resistance, and the inclined line in the low-frequency range represents the Warburg impedance [17]. It can be clearly seen that the charge transfer resistance of graphene/ZnO electrode is smaller than graphene. Because graphene and ZnO form the stereochemical structure, they influence each other and produce synergy. Their synergy improves the lithium ion diffusion and the electronic transfer and enhances the lithium storage capacity.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the graphene/ZnO composite is prepared as an anode for lithium ion battery via a liquid phase route. The ZnO nanoparticles with an average particle size of 20−50 nm uniformly wedge in the graphene nanosheets. It exhibits the high specific capacity of 1155.27 mAh g⁻¹ at 100 mA g⁻¹ and the initial charge capacity of 650.79 mAh g⁻¹ with 56.3% coulombic efficiency, all are superior to the graphene. The enhanced electrochemical performance is due to the synergistic effect, which can improve the lithium ion transfer and the electronic transmitted between ZnO nanoparticles and graphene nanosheets. So graphene/ZnO composite can be used as an ideal candidate for anode material of high-performance lithium ion batteries.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the projects of Natural Science Foundation of China (21271055), Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (no. QAK201304), and Youth Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province in China (no. QC2012C079).

References

H.-K. Song, K. T. Lee, M. G. Kim, L. F. Nazar, and J. Cho, “Recent progress in nanostructured cathode materials for lithium secondary batteries,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 3818–3834, 2010.

R. Marom, S. F. Amalraj, N. Leifer, D. Jacob, and D. Aurbach, “A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 27, pp. 9938–9954, 2011.

V. Singh, D. Joung, L. Zhai, S. Das, S. I. Khondaker, and S. Seal, “Graphene based materials: past, present and future,” Progress in Materials Science, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1178–1271, 2011.

S. J. Guo and S. J. Dong, “Graphene nanosheet: synthesis, molecular engineering, thin film, hybrids, and energy and analytical applications,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 2644–2672, 2011.

P. Guo, H. Song, X. Chen, L. Ma, G. Wang, and F. Wang, “Effect of graphene nanosheet addition on the electrochemical performance of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 688, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 2011.

D. A. Dikin, S. Stankovich, E. J. Zimney, et al., “Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper,” Nature, vol. 448, no. 7152, pp. 457–460, 2007.

Y. Xiao, C. W. Hu, and M. H. Cao, “High lithium storage capacity and rate capability achieved by mesoporous Co₃O₄ nanobundles,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 247, pp. 49–56, 2014.

Y. Li, X. Lv, J. Lu, and J. Li, “Preparation of SnO₂-nanocrystal/graphene-nanosheets composites and their lithium storage ability,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 49, pp. 21770–21774, 2010.

J. P. Liu, Y. Li, R. Ding et al., “Carbon/ZnO nanorod array electrode with significantly improved lithium storage capability,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 13, pp. 5336–5339, 2009.

Y. Chen, J. Lu, and Z. Gao, “Structural and electronic study of nanoscrolls rolled up by a single graphene sheet,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1625–1630, 2007.

J. Liu, Y. Li, R. Ding et al., “Carbon/ZnO nanorod array electrode with significantly improved lithium storage capability,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 13, pp. 5336–5339, 2009.

Z. Wu, L. Qin, and Q. Pan, “Fabrication and electrochemical behavior of flower-like ZnO-CoO-C nanowall arrays as anodes for lithium-ion batteries,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 509, no. 37, pp. 9207–9213, 2011.

W. S. Hummers Jr. and R. E. Offeman, “Preparation of graphitic oxide,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 80, no. 6, p. 1339, 1958.

G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Yao, and J. Park, “Graphene nanosheets for enhanced lithium storage in lithium ion batteries,” Carbon, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 2049–2053, 2009.

S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, R. D. Piner et al., “Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide,” Carbon, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1558–1565, 2007.

T. Lu, Y. Zhang, H. Li, L. Pan, Y. Li, and Z. Sun, “Electrochemical behaviors of graphene-ZnO and graphene-SnO₂ composite films for supercapacitors,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 55, no. 13, pp. 4170–4173, 2010.

Y. J. Mai, X. L. Wang, J. Y. Xiang et al., “CuO/graphene composite as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2306–2311, 2011.