Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 382469, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/382469

Research Article

Facile Hydrothermal Synthesis of Monodispersed MoS₂ Ultrathin Nanosheets Assisted by Ionic Liquid Brij56

Guan-Qun Han,1,2 Wen-Hui Hu,¹ Yong-Ming Chai,¹ Bin Dong,1,2 and Chen-Guang Liu¹

¹State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
²College of Science, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China

Received 21 January 2015; Accepted 24 May 2015

Academic Editor: Wolfgang Fritzsche

Copyright © 2015 Guan-Qun Han et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets have been successfully fabricated by a facile hydrothermal process assisted by ionic liquid Brij56. The effect of Brij56 on the morphology and structure of MoS₂ has been obviously observed. XRD shows that the as-prepared MoS₂ assisted by Brij56 has the weak and broad peak of (002) planes, which implies the small size and well dispersed structure of MoS₂ nanosheets. TEM and SEM images reveal that MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets have small size and few stacking layers with the adding of Brij56. HRTEM images prove that MoS₂ appears to have a highly monodispersed morphology and to be monolayer ultrathin nanosheets with the length about 5–8 nm, which can provide more exposed rims and edges as active sites for hydrogen evolution reaction. Brij56 has played a crucial role in preparing monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets as excellent electrocatalysts. The growth mechanism of monodispersed MoS₂ has been discussed in detail.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen as a promising sustainable energy carrier has attracted much attention owing to the increasing environmental pollution and the limited fossil fuel [1]. The ideal fashion of hydrogen production is to adopt photoelectrochemical [2] or electrochemical [3] route. However, Pt as highly active electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [4] has a high price and limited resources, which largely prevent the wide utilization of HER. Therefore, replacing the novel metals with earth-abundant elements represents future development of the electrocatalysts for HER [5].

MoS₂ has been widely investigated as a promising substitute for Pt due to its unique properties and abundant reserve [6]. Recent research has shown that the active sites of MoS₂ for HER are highly dependent on the exposed defects of the rims and edges [7]. However, as a typical two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal sulfide, MoS₂ has analogous layered structure of graphene, which results in severe stacking owing to the high surface energy and interlayer van der Waals attraction [8]. Moreover, the unsaturated sulfur atoms of MoS₂ can improve the discharge reaction and form S−H bonds, thus leading to hydrogen evolution easily [9]. Hu’s group prepared the amorphous MoS₃ particles with catalytically active S²⁻ and superior catalytic activity [10]. Therefore, designing highly active MoS₂ with more rims and edges sites has been a challenge by a facile process [11].

The ionic liquids have been used as structure-directing agent or dispersion solvents to prepare novel nanomaterials including the 2D nanosheets [12, 13]. The most exposed basal planes of MoS₂ are the thermodynamically stable (002) planes, which have poor activity for HER [14]. In our previous work, ionic liquid Brij56 [C₁₆H₃₃-(OCH₂-CH₂)₁₀OH] has been used to synthesize MoS₂ nanoflowers [15]. However, the severe stacking and large size of MoS₂ nanoflowers would decrease the exposed active sites for HER, which may be attributed to the Na₂MoO₄ as precursor. Thus, preventing the growth along (002) plane by changing reactants and experimental conditions can be expected to improve the exposure of the active sites of MoS₂ for HER [16].

In this work, ammonium thiomolybdate (ATTM) has been chosen as precursor owing to its in situ decomposition [17] in comparison to sulfidation from Na₂MoO₄. And suitable pH and reductant HONH₃Cl have also been used to control the structure of MoS₂. Therefore, monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets have been prepared by a facile hydrothermal synthesis assisted by ionic liquid Brij56. The effect of Brij56 concentration on the structure and size of MoS₂ has been investigated in detail. The growth mechanisms of monodispersed MoS₂ under the conditions of ATTM and Brij56 are also discussed.

2. Experimental

ATTM were synthesized according to the previous literature [18]. Then 1 mL or 5 mL Brij56 and 0.550 g ATTM were added to 20 mL of deionized water at about pH 10 under stirring for 3 h. Then, an appropriate amount of HONH₃Cl was added. The obtained solution was transferred into a Teflon stainless steel autoclave. Hydrothermal reaction was carried out at 240°C for 24 h. The as-prepared samples were washed and dried at 80°C for 24 h in a vacuum oven. Compared with the absence of Brij56, MoS₂ was also synthesized under otherwise identical conditions.

Crystallographic information of all samples was investigated with X-ray powder diffraction (XRD, X’Pert PRO MPD, Cu KR). The morphology of the samples was examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi, S-4800) and high-resolution analytical transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, JEM-2100UHR, 200 kV). Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) was used to examine the samples’ crystallinity.

3. Results and Discussion

XRD patterns of the as-synthesized MoS₂ under different concentration of Brij56 are shown in Figure 1(a). MoS₂ without Brij56 has strong peaks corresponding to (002), (100), (103), and (110) reflections, respectively, consistent with the standard diffraction file of MoS₂ (JCPDS 37-1492). With the using of Brij56, the peaks of (002) and (103) of MoS₂ decrease remarkably (1 mL Brij56) and almost disappear (5 mL Brij56), which indicates that Brij56 strongly prevents the growth of (002) and (103) planes. And MoS₂ with the absence of (002) implies the low crystallinity and monolayer structure of MoS₂ [19]. The slight right shift of (002) peak could be attributed to the distortion of lattice in MoS₂. The (100) and (110) planes keep stable, indicating the good stability of MoS₂, which can be confirmed by the selected area electron diffraction (SAED). As shown in Figures 1(b), 1(c), and 1(d), the SAED patterns show clearly more and more invisible rings corresponding to (002) and (103) with the adding of Brij56, which well agrees with the results of XRD.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 1: XRD and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of MoS₂ under different concentration of Brij56: (a) XRD of MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL, 1 mL, and 5 mL Brij56, respectively; (b, c, and d) SAED images of MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL, 1 mL, and 5 mL Brij56, respectively.

The size and morphology of as-prepared MoS₂ have been observed by SEM and TEM (Figure 2). Figures 2(a) and 2(d) show that MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL Brij56 has large aggregation and severe stacking, which imply less rims and edges of MoS₂. Figure 2(b) shows that the large aggregation of MoS₂ decreases and MoS₂ has some loose microstructure (in Figure 2(e)) when using 1 mL Brij56. The effect of Brij56 on morphology of MoS₂ has been proved. Next, as shown in Figure 2(c), MoS₂ assisted by 5 mL Brij56 became smaller with the size of about 20 nm. And porous structures of MoS₂ have been observed. Figure 2(f) confirms the loose porous structure and smaller size of MoS₂, indicating less stack layers and more rims and edges sites of MoS₂ with the increasing of concentration of Brij56.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 2: SEM and TEM images of MoS₂ with different concentration of Brij56: (a, b, and c) SEM images of MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL, 1 mL, and 5 mL Brij56; (d, e, and f) TEM images of MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL, 1 mL, and 5 mL Brij56.

HRTEM images with higher magnification prove the change tendency of monodispersed MoS₂ (Figure 3). Figure 3(a) shows that MoS₂ assisted by 0 mL Brij56 has the length of more than 100 nm and very severe stacking, indicating less rims and edges. Figure 3(b) shows that MoS₂ assisted by 1 mL Brij56 has obviously decreasing length of about 20–30 nm and less stacking layers with the larger interlayer spacing. The results indicate that Brij56 has prevented the rapid growth along (002) planes and the severe stacking of MoS₂. Figure 3(c) shows that monodispersed MoS₂ assisted by 5 mL Brij56 has the length of about 5–8 nm and appears to have monolayer structure, which is corresponding to the more porous structure of MoS₂ (in Figure 2(c)). The decreasing size and less stacking of MoS₂ would provide more defects sites. In addition, monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets are usually curly and bent to some extent on the rims and edges, which means more active sites [20].

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 3: HRTEM images of MoS₂ with different concentration of Brij56: (a) 0 mL, (b) 1 mL, and (c) 5 mL.

The formation mechanisms of monodispersed MoS₂ assisted by Brij56 have been discussed in Figure 4. Firstly, nonionic surfactant Brij56 as a dispersant will form a stable spherical micelles system for homogeneously dispersing under stirring. The size of the micelles will decrease with the increasing of the concentration of Brij56. The micelles could provide nucleation domains for in situ decomposition of , which may be helpful for size controlling and the growth along (002) direction of MoS₂. During the hydrothermal process, Brij56 micelles tend to be hydrophobic and increase the viscosity of micellar solution, which favors the monodispersed growth of MoS₂ [20]. MoS₂ with more monodispersed structure under the high concentration of Brij56 could provide rich active sites.

Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the formation mechanism of monodispersed MoS₂.

4. Conclusions

Monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets with more active sites for HER have been fabricated by a facile hydrothermal process assisted by Brij56. MoS₂ assisted by Brij56 has weak and broad peak of (002), indicating small size and well dispersed structure. SEM and TEM images reveal that highly dispersed MoS₂ nanosheets have been obtained with the increasing of the concentration of Brij56. Monodispersed MoS₂ assisted by 5 mL Brij56 has the length of about 5–8 nm and a monolayer structure, which provide more rims and edges sites. The curly structure of monodispersed MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets would also expose more active sites. The facile hydrothermal synthesis assisted by Brij56 has been a good route for excellent MoS₂ electrocatalysts for HER.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. U1162203 and 21106185) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (15CX05031A).

References

M. S. Dresselhaus and I. L. Thomas, “Alternative energy technologies,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6861, pp. 332–337, 2001.

J. R. McKone, N. S. Lewis, and H. B. Gray, “Will solar-driven water-splitting devices see the light of day?” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 407–414, 2014.

Z. B. Chen, A. J. Forman, and T. F. Jaramillo, “Bridging the gap between bulk and nanostructured photoelectrodes: the impact of surface states on the electrocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties of MoS2,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 117, no. 19, pp. 9713–9722, 2013.

J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, A. Logadottir et al., “Trends in the exchange current for hydrogen evolution,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. J23–J26, 2005.

H. Vrubel and X. L. Hu, “molybdenum boride and carbide catalyze hydrogen evolution in both acidic and basic solutions,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 51, no. 15, pp. 12703–12706, 2012.

Y. Li, H. Wang, L. Xie, Y. Liang, G. Hong, and H. Dai, “MoS₂ nanoparticles grown on graphene: an advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 19, pp. 7296–7299, 2011.

J. Kibsgaard, Z. Chen, B. N. Reinecke, and T. F. Jaramillo, “Engineering the surface structure of MoS₂ to preferentially expose active edge sites for electrocatalysis,” Nature Materials, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 963–969, 2012.

A. A. Jeffery, C. Nethravathi, and M. Rajamathi, “Two-dimensional nanosheets and layered hybrids of MoS₂ and WS₂ through exfoliation of ammoniated MS₂ (M = Mo,W),” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 1386–1396, 2014.

Y. Yan, B. Y. Xia, X. M. Ge, Z. L. Liu, J.-Y. Wang, and X. Wang, “Ultrathin MoS₂ nanoplates with rich active sites as highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution,” ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 24, pp. 12794–12798, 2013.

H. Vrubel, D. Merki, and X. L. Hu, “Hydrogen evolution catalyzed by MoS₃ and MoS₂ particles,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 6136–6144, 2012.

C. G. Morales-Guio and X. L. Hu, “Amorphous molybdenum sulfides as hydrogen evolution catalysts,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 2671–2681, 2014.

J. B. Lian, X. Duan, J. Ma, P. Peng, T. Kim, and W. J. Zheng, “Hematite (α-Fe₂O₃) with various morphologies: ionic liquid-assisted synthesis, formation mechanism, and properties,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 3749–3761, 2009.

L. Ma, W. X. Chen, H. Li, and Z. D. Xu, “Synthesis and characterization of MoS₂ nanostructures with different morphologies via an ionic liquid-assisted hydrothermal route,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 116, no. 2-3, pp. 400–405, 2009.

J. V. Lauritsen, J. Kibsgaard, S. Helveg et al., “Size-dependent structure of MoS₂ nanocrystals,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 2007.

B. Dong, Y. M. Chai, Y. Q. Liu, and C. G. Liu, “Hydrothermal synthesis and characterization of novel MoS₂ nanoflowers directed by ionic liquid,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 194–196, pp. 785–789, 2011.

J. F. Xie, H. Zhang, S. Li et al., “Defect-rich MoS₂ ultrathin nanosheets with additional active edge sites for enhanced electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 40, pp. 5807–5813, 2013.

X.-X. Zhao, B. Dong, Y.-M. Chai, Y.-P. Li, Y.-Q. Liu, and C.-G. Liu, “Ionic liquid assisted hydrothermal synthesis of uniform MoS₂ microspheres using (NH₄)₂MoS₄ as precursors,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 365–369, 2014.

Y. M. Chai, H. J. Zhao, Y. Q. Liu, and C. G. Liu, “Improvement on preparation method of ammonium tetrathiomolybdate,” Inorganic Chemicals Industry, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 12–15, 2007.

H. J. Tao, K. Yanagisawa, C. X. Zhang et al., “Synthesis and growth mechanism of monodispersed MoS₂ sheets/carbon microspheres,” CrystEngComm, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3027–3032, 2012.

L. Han, Q. R. Chen, Y. Wang, C. B. Gao, and S. N. Che, “Synthesis of amino group functionalized monodispersed mesoporous silica nanospheres using anionic surfactant,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 139, no. 1–3, pp. 94–103, 2011.