Mechanistic Understanding of the Engineered Nanomaterial- Induced Toxicity on Kidney

Institute of Life Sciences, Biomedical Collaborative Innovation Center of Zhejiang province, Wenzhou University, 325035 Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, 325035 Wenzhou, China Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Tissue Damage and Repair, Medical Research Center, Mudanjiang Medical University, Heilongjiang 157011, China State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian University of Technology, 2 Linggong Road, 116024 Dalian, China


Introduction
In recent decades, engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) with novel physicochemical properties have been widely applied in various fields such as electronics, cosmetics, food additives, and biosensors [1,2], and global ENM production is estimated to be more than 300,000 tons per year [3][4][5]. However, their safety is drawing more and more attention [6]. With ENM exposure, they could be accumulated and reside in the environment that could further lead to significant health issues [7]. The increasing use of ENMs has aroused people's worries regarding their undesirable side effects.
The ENMs can enter the lymph and blood carried in the blood stream through the epithelial and endothelial barrier, and with the flow of lymph to different organs and tissues [8]. It is noteworthy that ENMs can enter organs, tissues, and cells. In addition, it can also enter organelles, such as mitochondria and nucleus. ENMs can penetrate the cell membrane and damage the cell membrane through endocytosis and transmembrane [9]. ENMs could cause changes in membrane protein structure, disrupting the transport of substances into and out of cells, as well as intercellular transport [10]. ENMs could also damage the cytoskeleton of cells, interfering with cell transport and cell division. ENMs could damage Golgi apparatus and interferes with lysosome formation, thereby hindering autophagy and degrading large molecules and triggering apoptosis. When the mitochondria and the endoplasmic reticulum are damaged, cell energy imbalance and endoplasmic reticulum stress will be caused. Then, cells produce oxygen and other free radicals. Many studies have shown that oxidative stress plays a central role in ENMinduced toxicity [11][12][13]. Increased levels of ROS could lead to inflammation, DNA damage, cell cycle arrest, and ultimately apoptosis. All of these interfere with the normal mechanism of cell metabolism and metabolism of tissues and organs.
Because of its high blood supply and the ability to exclude harmful substances in the body, the kidneys are particularly susceptible to exogenous substances. The podocyte was the key participant of the glomerular filtration barrier; the cytotoxicity of ENMs will affect glomerular filtration function. The ENMs filtered by glomerular cells can further damage the kidney. After renal damage, the renal tubular epithelial cells can cause abnormal metabolism, biochemical disorders, structural and functional damage, producing oxygen free radicals, necrosis, or apoptosis. Necrotic renal tubular epithelial cells fall off from the basement membrane and release intracellular contents, causing local inflammatory cells to infiltrate, and can continue to act on renal tubular epithelial cells, which produces excessive extracellular matrix in the epithelial cells of the tubule and leads to the formation of renal interstitial fibrosis [14]. Studies have found that the apoptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells is one of the main causes of renal tubular dysfunction [15,16].
Although current studies suggest that ENM exposure may potentially cause toxicities to the kidneys, we still need further studies to elucidate all the underlying molecular mechanisms regarding how these ENMs induce renal toxicity. The purpose of this review is to outline the nephrotoxicity of ENMs with different physicochemical properties and the related mechanisms.

The Exposure Routes of ENMs and Their Distribution in the Kidney
The ENMs can enter the body through various ways, e.g., inhalation, ingestion, skin uptake, injection, implantation, and direct penetration in cells and tissues ( Figure 1) [17]. Among these, inhalation and injection are the most common ways of exposure. However, regardless of exposure route, ENMs can permeate into the bloodstream through different pathways and were spread through the blood circulation system to various organs [18]. The classic target organs include the kidney, heart, liver, spleen, lung, brain, and gastrointestinal tract [19,20]. During the metabolic process, the clearance of ENMs will undergo major pathways including hepatobiliary metabolism, urinary excretion, and fecal excretion [21,22]. ENMs with sizes above 6 nm are mainly removed by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), e.g., liver and spleen. ENMs less than 6 nm can be efficiently filtered by the glomerulus and cleared from the body through the urinary system [23,24]. Excretion through the urinary system is considered a preferred choice for the removal of ENMs; it is faster and more effective in clearing ENMs than other pathways [25]. The kidney, a key organ of producing urine, plays an important role on removing the metabolites of the body and some waste and poison and retaining water and other useful substances, e.g., glucose, ions, and nutrients, by reabsorption function [26]. The kidney is also the last barrier for ENMs excreted from the body through the urinary system [27]. The glomerulus can filter ENMs in the blood through the glomerular filtration barrier ( Figure 2). The glomerular filtration barrier is composed of glomerular endothelial cells, a glomerular basement membrane, and a podocyte [28]. The endothelial layer features 70-90 nm fenestrations and provides initial physical filtration barriers [24]. The glomerular endothelial cells are covered with functional glycocalyx [23,29]. The glomerular basement membrane (GBM) is a highly organized nonamorphous meshwork. The pore size of the podocyte layer is 4~11 nm and is covered by a layer of glycocalyx [28,30]. In healthy states, ENMs with a particle size less than 6 nm can be efficiently filtered by the glomerulus and then excreted with urine [23,24]. In the condition of a disease, the loss of podocytes leads to the breakdown of the glomerular filtration barrier. Leakage and abnormal fenestrae will contribute to the accumulation of larger ENMs in the Bowman space [28]. Renal tubular epithelial cells have a strong reabsorption function, and therefore become the main accumulation sites of glomerular-filtrated ENMs [22,31]. Excessive accumulation of ENMs in glomerular and tubular cells can lead to kidney damage and affect the normal function of the kidney, mainly in the form of oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage, autophagy, and endoplasmic reticulum stress [12,32].

Molecular Mechanism of Renal Toxicity
Induced by ENMs  [34]. ROS are bioproducts of oxygen metabolism in various cell compartments, including the cell membrane, cytoplasm, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Mitochondria are major sources of ROS production [35].
Oxidative stress is considered to be one of the most important mechanisms of ENM-induced nephrotoxicity ( Figure 3) [9,36,37]. Oxidative stress is characterized by an increase in ROS, which is essentially an imbalance between ROS production and antioxidant defense [38]. Under normal conditions, only a small amount of active oxygen is produced in the body. In the kidney, the main role of ROS and their derivative molecules regulates the resorption of solutes and water, which is essential for maintaining electrolyte homeostasis and extracellular fluid volume [39]. Studies have demonstrated that various types of ENMs, e.g., gold, silver, and copper, were able to induce intracellular ROS production. However, the link between ENMs and oxidative stress markers has not been well established. ENMs can pass through the cell membrane through active transport or passive diffusion [9]. The uptake of ENMs by glomerular and tubular cells plays a central role in direct or indirect ROS production, which is related to the size, chemical composition, and surface reactivity of ENMs [13,[40][41][42]. The smaller the particles, the more surface masses per unit mass and the stronger their reactivity during ENM-cell interaction. The surface area of ENMs was highly correlated with their ability to generate ROS [9,43]. Animal studies showed that 10, 20, and 50 nm gold nanoparticles (GNPs) could destroy the function of the kidneys. Histological changes were mainly seen in the cortex, and more toxicity was induced in proximal 2 Journal of Nanomaterials   3 Journal of Nanomaterials tubules than distal renal tubules. The damage caused by smaller GNPs (10 nm) is more serious. Exposure to GNPs has produced changes in renal tubules and caused atrophy and necrosis of renal cells. These may be due to the interaction of GNPs with enzymes and proteins in the kidney, interfering with antioxidant defense mechanisms, leading to the production of ROS. The degree of renal injury is related to the exposure time of GNPs [44]. In two renal proximal tubular cell lines (human HK-2 and porcine LLC-PK1), the induced toxicity is time-dependent. Cytotoxicity also increases with the decrease of nanoparticle size. 20 nm Si NPs led to more oxidative stress [37]. Accumulated ENMs in the kidney can cause a dramatic increase in ROS levels, as well as a decrease in protective molecules and enzymes, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and subsequent ROS-mediated damage to various cellular components, including lipids, DNA, and proteins, which could lead to the destruction of cellular structural integrity and eventual apoptosis [42]. At the molecular level, it was found that CuSNPs could lead to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, subsequent PARP lysis, and cell death in HEK293 cells [45]. In HK2 and HEK293 cell lines, silver nanoparticles were found to increase the production of reactive oxygen species and reduce cell viability [46]. Meanwhile, Nrf2-mediated GSH increase plays a protective role in Ag NP-induced toxicity [47]. A large number of studies have shown that oxidative stress also plays an important role for podocyte injury [48,49]. ROS overproduction can cause podocyte injury, including DNA damage and apoptosis [50,51]. In vitro studies showed that copper NPs affected the oxidant-antioxidant balance, resulting in increased production of ROS and malondialdehyde (MDA), decreased podocyte activity, and significantly increased apoptosis [49,52]. MDA, as an indicator of the extent of lipid peroxidation, is generally considered an indicator of cell damage [49,53]. Collectively, ENM-induced oxidative stress can lead to metabolic disorders and inflammation signal transduction, thereby affecting the normal function of the kidney.

Inflammation Induced by ENMs.
Inflammation is the response of the immune system to stimuli, such as damaged cells, pathogens, toxic compounds, or radiation [54]. It plays an important role in removing harmful stimuli and initiating the healing process [55]. Inflammation is a crucial defense mechanism for health. Coordinate activation of multiple signaling pathways is one of the characteristics of the inflammatory response, which regulates the expression of the anti-inflammatory mediators in the tissue cells and leukocytes recruited from the blood [56].
ENMs can be recognized by immune cells, which further produce inflammatory responses, including secreting signaling molecules or cytokines to attract more cells to destroy foreign bodies ( Figure 4) [57,58]. Microbiological products and cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), can stimulate intracellular signaling pathways and then lead to inflammation [59]. Studies have shown that increased expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and other proinflammatory cytokines can lead to impairment of renal function and structure [60][61][62]. Previous studies have demonstrated that a variety of ENMs, including mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and Ag NPs, could cause nephrotoxicity that was mediated by inflammation. On the one hand, these ENMs can activate multiple typical proinflammatory signaling pathways such as NF-κB signaling pathway, which regulates the production of inflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of inflammatory cells. It plays an important role in inflammation, immune response, cell survival, and apoptosis [63]. In vitro studies showed that MSNs induced cytotoxicity in NRK-52E cells and increased the expression of fibrotic markers, such as TGF-β, fibronectin, and ICAM-1. In animal experiments, the expression of NF-κB p65 and the nuclear translocation  Journal of Nanomaterials increased in the renal tissue after exposure to MSNs. This indicates that inflammation is the main effect of MSNinduced acute nephrotoxicity [14]. Studies have demonstrated that long-term exposure to Ag NPs can promote renal ultrastructural damage and induce mitochondrial rupture and inflammation in rats, which is closely related to the activation of the Akt/mTOR, JNK/Stat, and Erk/NF-κB pathways [64]. On the other hand, excessive accumulation of ENMs in the kidney can also cause inflammation. A study has shown that ingestion of Ag NPs could cause their accumulation in animal kidneys. These Ag NPs could cause inflammation and cell damage by forming complexes with proteins or other cellular biomolecules in the kidneys. At the same time, Ag NPs can lead to hypertrophy and fusion of the proximal tubule endothelial cells and thickening of the podocyte and basement membrane [65]. Inflammation and inflammatory reactions are not only the main causes of kidney damage and nephron loss but also the cause of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) [66]. Collectively, a series of synergistic mechanisms of ENM-induced inflammation are involved in tissue damage, extracellular matrix remodeling, oxidative stress, and fibrosis in kidney.

Autophagy Induced by ENMs.
Autophagy is an important process to maintain normal function and structure of cells in all eukaryotes [67]. It can degrade and recycle damaged organelles and macromolecules through the lysosomal pathway [68,69]. Autophagy is mainly involved in the degradation of long-lived proteins, while ephemeral proteins can be degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome pathway [70,71]. The kidney, as the excretory organ of mammals, is composed of many kinds of cells. Under physiological conditions, these cells have a high level of autophagy to complete their filtration function [72]. However, many cytotoxic stimuli can induce autophagy, including many types of ENMs, e.g., gold, iron, zinc, titanium, and bismuth. Moreover, many ENMs are selective nephrotoxic substances that preferentially accumulate in the kidneys, which can lead to further kidney damage ( Figure 5) [41,73]. Under certain stress conditions, the autophagy of the kidneys is activated [74]. There is evidence showing that bismuth NPs (BiNPs) can induce the occurrence of autophagy and increase the expression of LC3II in the HEK293 cell line. BiNP-induced renal cytotoxicity may be due to the release of bismuth ions in NPs [75].
Further animal experiments showed that ROS produced by BiNPs may be the main inducement of autophagy, and ROS blockade can reduce autophagy. Autophagy induced by BiNPs is mainly regulated by the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway [76]. Under normal conditions, GNPs can be deposited in the kidneys, particularly in renal tubular epithelial cells [44,77]. In the HK2 cell line, 5 nm GNP (50 nM) treatment could cause autophagy and cell survival. Electron microscopy revealed that 5 nm GNPs were mainly localized in vesicles or lysosomes; it is the direct evidence for the formation of autophagy [78]. Chronic hypoxic is inevitable in chronic kidney diseases; in hypoxic conditions, the same dose of 5 nm GNP (50 nM) exposure resulted in the production of reactive oxygen species, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and increased apoptosis and autophagic cell death in the HK2 cell line. It may be due to GNP-induced ROS triggering autophagy directly or indirectly by inhibiting classical autophagy (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signaling pathways [78]. This suggests that the potential GNP-related treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease is at risk. Another study shows that oral intake of ZnO NPs in mice will lead to glomeruli segmentation, hydropic degeneration in epithelial cells, necrosis of epithelial cells in tubules, and swelling in epithelial cells of proximal tubules [79]. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that mediates adaptive responses to hypoxia at cellular and systemic levels [80]. The experiments have also proved that ZnO NP nephrotoxicity can be associated with ROS-induced HIF-1 alpha 5 Journal of Nanomaterials signaling pathway, apoptosis, and autophagy. HIF-1 knockout can result in a significant decrease in autophagy level, but increase in cytotoxicity. It is suggested that HIF-1 alpha may have protective effects on ZnO NP-induced nephrotoxicity [79]. In addition to tubular cells, ingestion of ENMs can also trigger autophagy of glomerular podocytes. Podocytes play an important role in glomerular filtration. Changes in podocyte autophagy are critical to the survival of cells under physiological or stress conditions [72]. Research shows that the glomeruli podocyte has a high rate of autophagy to maintain a terminally differentiated cell [81]. In a mouse podocyte cell line, TiO 2 NPs induce autophagy by activating AMPK, which inhibits mTOR, and this autophagy as an antioxidant system protect podocytes from death [72]. Research shows that Fe 3 O 4 NPs can damage the lysosomes and lead to the accumulation of LC3-positive autophagosomes and can also cause mitochondrial damage and ER stress, resulting in the accumulation of autophagosomes in the kidneys of mice [82]. However, PLGA-coated Fe 3 O 4 NPs reduce damage effect in the kidney. Because PLGA-coated Fe 3 O 4 NPs enter cells through the endocytosis pathway and then transported to the lysosome for degradation, the lysosome can directly transport the remaining residues from cells, thus reducing the chance of NP contact with organelles in the cytoplasm and the cytotoxicity induced by NPs [82]. These studies indicate that although autophagy is a cytoprotective mechanism for ENM-induced nephrotoxicity, excessive self-degradation may also damage renal cells.

DNA Damage Induced by ENMs.
The exposure of ENMs could lead to potential DNA damage [83]. The main form of DNA damage includes base loss and base pair mismatch DNA single-strand breaks (SSB) and double-strand breaks (DSBS) [84]. DNA damage activates specific cascades of cellular signals, which then act on DNA repair, cell cycle arrest, senescence, or cell death [85]. The complex mechanisms of DNA damage and repair jointly determine the fate of the affected cells ( Figure 6).
Numerous studies have shown that a variety of ENMs can cause DNA damage in the kidney. ROS is considered to be a genotoxic mechanism of ENMs, which can promote oxidative DNA damage [86]. Several in vitro studies have shown that Ag NPs may trigger ROS production by mediating mitochondrial dysfunction, leading to DNA damage [87,88]. In the HK2 cell line, Ag NPs can induce ROS-mediated DNA damage and subsequent G2/M cell cycle arrest in human renal epithelial cells. The DNA damage signal induced by Ag NPs was first transduced by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and Ataxia-and Rad-related (ATR) kinases. Furthermore, G2/M checkpoints can be activated by the inhibition of cell division cyclin 25 homolog C (CDC25C) and the activation of p53 signaling [47]. p53 is a key participant in the intrinsic cellular response of DNA damage. Activation of p53 leads to cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and aging [89]. Cells with severe DNA damage will cease to grow and cause apoptosis. Transcription factor NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) controls the expression of various antioxidant genes. Knockout of Nrf2 can enhance the cytotoxicity of Ag NPs [47]. In addition to Ag NPs, CuO NPs and TiO 2 NPs could also produce ROS and cause DNA damage, and eventually lead to cell death through apoptosis [40,90,91]. The degree of oxidative stress is closely related to the dose and time of injection [92]. In HEK293 cell line, exposure to 20 or 50 nm Si NPs resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in cell viability. Flow cytometry analysis showed that Si NPs could cause G2/M arrest, and exposure to Si NPs resulted in increased cytotoxicity and oxidative stress [93]. Studies have shown that blocking cell cycle progression at G2/M checkpoints can enhance apoptosis through the JNK-dependent pathway that lead to renal fibrosis [94][95][96]. In rat kidney epithelial cells (NRK-52E), 12.5-50.0 μg/mL ZnO NPs induced genotoxicity and caused statistically significant DNA damage. The interaction between ZnO NPs and cells can increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in DNA strand breakage, oxidative DNA adducts, DNA crosslinking, and DNA-protein crosslinking. When ZnO NPs dissolve, zinc ions will be  Journal of Nanomaterials released, which can destroy zinc homeostasis in cells, cause lysosome and mitochondria damage, and ultimately lead to cell death [97]. DNA damage induced by ENMs is also closely related to its physical and chemical properties. There is evidence to show that in human proximal tubule cells (HPTC), a high dose of 40 nm branched polyethylenimine (BPEI) AuNPs can regulate DNA damage and repair pathway, apoptosis, and heat shock response. Compared with lipoic acid-(LA-) and polyethylene glycol-(PEG-) coated AuNPs, the smaller 40 nm BPEI AuNPs tend to have greater cell uptake and cytotoxicity once it enters the renal tubular cells, suggesting that nephrotoxicity is more likely to happen [98]. The regulation of DNA damage is important for maintaining the normal function of the renal system. A large number of human kidney diseases are closely related to the defects of DNA damage response [99][100][101][102][103]. Therefore, more attention should be paid to ENM-induced DNA damage.

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Induced by ENMs.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an organelle for protein synthesis, folding, assembly, and modification [104]. ER stress is caused by accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum [105]. ER stress, also known as the unfolded protein response (UPR), can affect a series of cell feedback loops and strictly control the function of the ER [104]. The main regulator of the UPR signal network is the ER chaperone protein, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78). Under the condition of ER stress, GRP78 first combines unfolded or misfolded proteins and separates them from 3 major ER sensors, including inositol requiring-1α (IRE1α), protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) (Figure 7) [106]. ER stress occurs frequently in a variety of pathophysiological conditions, such as neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes mellitus, ischemic injury, inflammation, infection, and toxicity of chemicals and metals [107][108][109]. ER stress and misfolding of protein also exists in many kidney diseases, including acute renal injury, chronic renal disease, glomerular disease associated with genetic mutations, primary glomerulonephritis, renal fibrosis, and diabetic nephropathy.
Previous studies have shown that in specific kidney diseases, renal damage can be reduced by improving protein folding [110]. Currently, there are relatively few reports of renal ER stress induced by ENMs; however, due to the wide application prospects of ENMs, we still need to pay attention to its potential toxicity. There is evidence to show that Fe 3 O 4 and PLGA-coated Fe 3 O 4 NPs can be absorbed by cells through endocytosis. Fe 3 O 4 NPs could destroy the lysosome and cause mitochondrial damage, ROS, and ER stress, resulting in the accumulation of autophagy in the kidney of mice, thereby affecting the normal function of the kidneys [82]. Disturbance of oxidative stress and hypoxia could lead to ER dysfunction, further induce ER stress and subsequent unfolded protein response (UPR). UPR is an adaptive response; it induces apoptosis in severe or long-term ER stress [111]. Studies have also shown that ER stress is a major factor leading to the apoptosis of renal tubular epithelial cells [112]. In vivo experiments showed that different tissues had different sensitivity to Ag NPs after intratracheal drip exposure in mice. Quantitative analysis of ER marker genes including chop, xbp-1s, and BiP showed that the mice exposed to 2 mg of Ag NPs had obvious endoplasmic reticulum stress response in the kidney, lung, and liver. However, TUNEL assay showed only apoptosis in the lung and kidney [113]. ER stress is an important mechanism of cell selfprotection. It can be used as an early biomarker to evaluate the toxicity of exogenous stimulants [113].

Conclusion and Perspectives
The present review provided an overview on ENM-induced nephrotoxicity and its potential mechanisms. Current studies suggest that the toxicity of ENMs in the kidney depends largely on their physical and chemical properties, such as the size, shape, electric charge, and chemical compositions. Particle size is the main factor that makes ENMs more toxic than normal particles. Reducing particle size will increase the surface area of particles. The small size effect and large specific surface area of ENMs can interact with cell membranes, thereby destroying the integrity of cell membranes. At the same time, it enters the organelles such as mitochondria and nuclei and reacts with intracellular mitochondria, lysosomes, and other substances. The decomposed ENMs may further generate a large number of free radicals, which may cause the damage of the cell's ultrastructure and function [114][115][116]. Numerous in vivo studies have shown that the smaller the size of nanoparticles, the higher the degree of damage, the more toxic the kidney appears [44,77,117]. The ENMinduced nephrotoxicity is not only affected by size factors but also closely related to the shape of ENMs. Animal experiments show that the degradation products released by different shapes of ENMs during biodegradation are also different. If the size of degradation products is larger than the renal filtration threshold of about 10 nanometers, it can be slowly cleared through renal filtration, thus causing damage to the glomerular structure. If they are degraded into small molecules of 10 nanometers smaller than the renal filtration threshold, they may undergo glomerular filtration; however, they will be absorbed by the renal tubules and cause damage to the renal tubules [118]. Additionally, studies show that the surface charge of particles played an important role in nephrotoxicity, and the cytotoxicity of positive-charged nanoparticles is stronger than that of negative-charged nanoparticles. This may be related to the negative charge on the cell membrane. When cationic nanoparticles destroy the cell membrane, they mainly punch holes in the cell membrane. The membranes become thinner or corrode, causing damage to kidney cells [119]. Functional groups could be grafted to ENMs that could alter cytotoxicity [120]. In vivo experiments showed that PLGA-coated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles could enter cells through endocytosis and then be transported to lysosomes for degradation, which reduced the chance of contact with organelles. Compared with unmodified Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles, PLGA-coated Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles could reduce renal damage [82]. When these ENMs of different properties are transported to the kidney, they can further induce the apoptosis and necrosis of kidney cells by inducing oxidative stress, inflammation, autophagy, DNA damage, and ER stress and ultimately lead to the destruction of kidney function. However, these mechanisms do not exist independently. Oxidative stress plays a central role in ENM-induced nephrotoxicity. Increased levels of reactive oxygen species can cause abnormal metabolism, biochemical disorders, and structural and functional damage of renal cells and further trigger the occurrence and development of other toxicities. Therefore, the specific mechanism of this ENM-induced nephrotoxicity and its intricate interaction are still not fully elucidated. At present, most of the studies on ENM-induced nephrotoxicity are based on animal and cell tests, and different experimental models can affect the toxicity of ENMs. Moreover, the ENMinduced nephrotoxicity is mainly focused on the analysis of its biological distribution, cell damage, organ system damage, and other pathological aspects, but less on the mechanisms. It is necessary for us to explore the potential mechanism of ENM-induced nephrotoxicity more deeply and establish an effective method system for evaluating ENM-induced nephrotoxicity, which will help us avoid the potential risks of ENM-induced nephrotoxicity for safer and effective applications of ENMs in the future.  Journal of Nanomaterials