Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2678017, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2678017

Review Article

Elevated Plasma Endothelin-1 Levels in Normal Tension Glaucoma and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis

Shengjie Li,¹ Aiping Zhang,¹ Wenjun Cao,1,2 and Xinghuai Sun2,3,4,5

¹Department of Clinical Laboratory, Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
²Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
³State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
⁴Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
⁵Shanghai Key Laboratory of Visual Impairment and Restoration, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Received 28 May 2016; Revised 28 September 2016; Accepted 12 October 2016

Academic Editor: Jesús Pintor

Copyright © 2016 Shengjie Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Purpose. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the association between the plasma endothelin-1 level and the risks of normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods. Relevant publications were collected from three databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science through December 31, 2015. In this study, the terms “(endothelin OR ET) AND glaucoma” were searched. Review Manager 5.2 was used to process the data. Results. Seven studies (212 cases, 164 controls) were included for the NTG analysis. The mean plasma endothelin-1 level in the NTG subjects was 0.60 pg/mL (, 95% CI: 0.17–1.04) higher than that of the healthy controls. Six studies (160 cases, 174 controls) were included for the POAG analysis, and the endothelin-1 level was 0.63 pg/mL (, 95% CI: 0.12–1.15) higher in the POAG subjects than in the healthy controls. Additionally, two studies influenced the meta-analysis results regarding the association of plasma endothelin-1 with POAG by sensitivity analysis, and the probability of publication bias was low. Conclusions. The observation that NTG and POAG subjects showed significantly elevated endothelin-1 plasma concentrations suggests that a higher plasma level of endothelin-1 might increase the risk of NTG and POAG development.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is a group of heterogeneous diseases characterized by the following features: optic nerve head cupping, glaucomatous visual field defects, and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [1]. Open-angle glaucoma (OAG), which is the most common type of glaucoma, is divided into primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) (IOP > 21 mm Hg) and normal tension glaucoma (NTG) (untreated IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg) based on IOP. The proportion of NTG among OAG varies depending on different population studies: Asian (52%–92%), South African (57.1%), American (31.7%), Netherlandish (38.9%), and Italian (30%) [2]. In OAG patients, irreversible loss of peripheral vision frequently is associated with a pathologic elevation of IOP. Although increased IOP is the most important known risk factor for POAG [3], some other unknown risk factors also exist, especially in patients with NTG [4]. NTG patients who have a lower tolerance compared with POAG may have a higher prevalence of vascular abnormalities. The prevalence of vascular dysregulation is higher in those with NTG than in those with POAG [5, 6]. Over the last few years, several studies suggested that vascular dysfunction might play an important role in the pathogenesis of GON (glaucomatous optic neuropathy) [7, 8]. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), being one of the key regulators for vascular function and widely expressed by endothelia cells [9], has been hypothesized to play important role in the progression of GON [10, 11].

Although many publications evaluated the plasma ET-1 level in NTG and POAG, the association between plasma ET-1 and glaucoma still remained controversial. Several studies showed that plasma ET-1 level is significantly elevated in NTG [12–16] and POAG [12, 15] groups than in control group while others reported that no significant difference of ET-1 levels was observed between those three groups [13, 17–19]. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether the plasma ET-1 level is significantly elevated in NTG and POAG and to confirm the association between the plasma ET-1 level and glaucoma.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

The studies were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science. The search terms “(endothelin-1 OR ET-1) AND glaucoma” were used to retrieve the relevant studies. The reference lists of all the relevant articles were searched to identify other studies. We searched for relevant studies from the beginning of indexing for each database to August 31, 2015.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

The studies were included in the meta-analysis if the following criteria were met:

(1)the study evaluated the association between glaucoma and ET-1;(2)the report was a case-control study of the disease;(3)healthy subjects were collected as the control group;(4)the plasma ET-1 concentrations in the case subjects and control subjects were measured;(5)it was possible to obtain the full article. A chart of the article search process is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Chart of the article search process.

2.3. Data Extraction

The articles were reviewed independently by two investigators (Shengjie Li and Aiping Zhang), who searched all the items in the articles. The following characteristics were extracted from each study: (1) name of the first author, (2) publication year, (3) country, (4) ages of the cases and controls, (5) number of cases and controls, and (6) the ET-1 concentration data of the cases and controls.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.2 (the Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). The heterogeneity of the pooled mean differences was estimated using the statistic. The significance of the pooled effect size was determined with the Z test. The relative risk was observed using inverse-variance weighted random effects models. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for ET-1 were calculated for each study. A funnel plot analysis was performed to assess the potential publication bias. We performed a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the stability of the results through a leave-one-out strategy. This method uses sequential omission of individual studies in every comparison to determine whether there is a significant alteration of the combined values. A value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Studies

From the initial search strategy, 182 articles were identified, and 172 articles were subsequently excluded (Figure 1). Thus, 10 studies [12–21] were included in the meta-analysis. The characteristics of the studies are listed in Table 1.

Table 1: Characteristics of the included studies.

First author
Year
Country
Case
Control

Age (years)
ET-1 (pg/mL)

Age (years)
ET-1 (pg/mL)

NTG studies

Henry
2006
England
8

8

Lee
2012
Korea
45

35

Sugiyama
1995
Japan
52

10

Chen
2013
China
18

37

Kunimatsu
2006
Japan
30

19

Galassi
2011
Italy
44

40

Cellini
1997
Italy
15
64.7

15
65.8

POAG studies

Sugiyama
1995
Japan
10

10

Chen
2013
China
31

37

Nicolela
2003
Canada
41

24

Cellini
2012
Italy
40

40

Kunimatsu
2006
Japan
18

19

Holló
1998
Hungary
20

44

: number; data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3.2. Meta-Analysis of the Association of Endothelin-1 with NTG

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 212 NTG cases and 164 normal controls. The plasma ET-1 levels were higher in the NTG group than in the control group, with a mean difference of 0.6 pg/mL [, 95% CI = 0.17–1.04]; however, there was significant heterogeneity across the 7 studies ( = 95%, ) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Meta-analysis of the plasma ET-1 levels in the NTG and control groups. A random effects model was used to calculate the mean difference. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

3.3. Meta-Analysis of the Association of ET-1 with POAG

Six studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 160 POAG cases and 174 normal controls. The plasma ET-1 levels were higher in the POAG group than in the control group, with a mean difference of 0.63 pg/mL [, 95% CI = 0.12–1.15]; however, there was significant heterogeneity across the 6 studies ( = 86%, ) (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Meta-analysis of the plasma ET-1 levels in the POAG and control groups. A random effects model was used to calculate the mean difference. CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

3.4. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

In the meta-analysis of the association between plasma ET-1 and NTG, the sensitivity analysis revealed that one study had a slight influence on the result. Two studies influenced the meta-analysis results regarding the association between plasma ET-1 and POAG (Table 2). The funnel plot analysis suggested that no publication bias existed (Figures 4 and 5).

Table 2: Sensitivity analysis by the leave-one-out strategy.

Study omitted
Mean difference
95% CI

NTG studies

None
0.60
0.17–1.04
0.007

Henry et al. 2006
0.82
0.40–1.24
0.0001

Lee et al. 2012
0.57
0.10–1.04
0.02

Sugiyama et al. 1995
0.55
0.06–1.04
0.03

Chen et al. 2013
0.49
0.03–0.95
0.04

Kunimatsu et al. 2006
0.69
0.20–1.18
0.006

Galassi et al. 2011
0.64
−0.02–1.31

Cellini et al. 1997
0.47
0.03–0.90
0.03

POAG studies

None
0.63
0.12–1.15
0.02

Sugiyama et al. 1995
0.65
0.07–1.23
0.03

Chen et al. 2013
0.42
−0.15–0.98

Nicolela et al. 2003
0.71
0.14–1.27
0.01

Cellini et al. 2012
0.50
−0.14–1.14

Kunimatsu et al. 2006
0.73
0.17–1.29
0.01

Holló et al. 1998
0.77
0.26–1.228
0.003

CI = confidence interval, for the influenced meta-analysis results regarding the association between plasma ET-1 and NTG, for the influenced meta-analysis results regarding the association between plasma ET-1 and POAG.

Figure 4: Funnel plot analysis to detect publication bias between the plasma ET-1 level and the risk of POAG.

Figure 5: Funnel plot analysis to detect publication bias between the plasma ET-1 level and the risk of NTG.

4. Discussion

Because the relationship of the plasma ET-1 level and the presentation of NTG or POAG remained uncertain, we performed this meta-analysis to clarify the relationship. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis examining the relationship between ET-1 and glaucoma. We found that the ET-1 plasma level was higher in the NTG group than in the control group (, 95% CI = 0.17–1.04). Similarly, the plasma ET-1 level was significantly elevated in the POAG group compared with the control group (, 95% CI = 0.12–1.15). The results of this meta-analysis indicate that a higher ET-1 plasma level is associated with a significantly increased risk of NTG and POAG.

ET-1 is supposed by some to have association with NTG [12–16]. Lee et al. [14] performed a case-control study and suggested that the systemic levels of ET-1 were significantly higher in the NTG group than in the control group. Similarly, Sugiyama et al. [13] also found that the plasma levels of ET-1 were higher in NTG. In another study conducted in China, Chen et al. [12] also revealed that plasma ET-1 levels were elevated in NTG patients. However, inconsistent results that the ET-1 levels were not significantly different between NTG and control were also reported by Kunimatsu et al. [17] and Henry et al. [18]. Our evaluation in this meta-analysis revealed that ET-1 levels were higher in NTG patients which indicates its positive association with NTG.

Moreover, Chen et al. [12] and Cellini et al. [15] suggested that POAG patients have a higher plasma ET-1 level than normal control also. Nicolela et al. [13, 17, 19] also reported that plasma ET-1 level was relatively higher in POAG than control though the difference was not significant. Only one publication claimed the plasma ET-1 level to be lower in POAG than control [21]. Our study suggested the probability that plasma ET-1 concentrations be elevated in POAG subjects which indicated that it is significantly associated with POAG.

It is of the most interest that in addition to an important role of ET-1 in the pathogenesis of systemic vascular disease, it also may be significant that the plasma level of ET-1 was higher in glaucoma patients. The fact that both NTG and POAG patients have a similarly high ET-1 level might indicate that ET-1 functions in the pathogenesis of both POAG and NTG. Several major population studies and clinical trials have reported the association of cardiovascular disease or hypertension with OAG and have indicated that cardiovascular disease and hypertension increase the risk of OAG [22–24]. The reasons under the relatively surprising observation that glaucoma patients have a higher plasma ET-1 level without presenting with systemic vascular disease remain unclear. However, the following factors might explain this observation: ET-1 might play a role in the pathogenesis of glaucoma and glaucoma patients might have hidden or subclinical vascular disease, which has been suggested in several reports. A recent study revealed that ET-1 dose-dependently enhances cell contraction of the trabecular meshwork (TM) [25]. Another study reported that ET-1 receptor B is expressed in human TM cells [26], and thus an increased ET-1 level might induce ocular hypertension. Karadag et al. showed that the role of ET-1 in glaucoma development involves a mechanism other than increased IOP [27]. Another hypothetical mechanism related to the role of ET-1 in glaucoma is optic nerve ischemia [28]. The eye is frequently involved in vasospastic syndrome in glaucoma patients [29]. The increased level of ET-1 might play an important role in optic nerve ischemia with respect to ET-1 mediated vasoconstriction and the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Consequently, ET-1 might be a good predictive biomarker or a target for pharmacologic intervention.

In this meta-analysis, the increased plasma ET-1 level in POAG and NTG were observed while the heterogeneity should also be considered. A sensitivity analysis was performed by a leave-one-out strategy to further evaluate the stability of the data in the individual studies. A total of three studies [12, 16, 20] had a slight influence on the results, and we considered that the following factors might be responsible. First, the subjects in these studies were of different races and heterogeneity might be introduced as a main source. Treiber et al. [30] and Hartley et al. [31] reported that the African Americans had significantly higher plasma ET-1 levels than European Americans. Moreover it was also reported that the black race exhibited higher plasma levels of ET-1 than the white race [32]. Second, the subjects in these studies were of different socioeconomic status, which might be another reason for heterogeneity. Cooper et al. [33] found that ET-1 levels actually increased in association with different psychosocial burdens in blacks and whites, and plasma ET-1 levels were higher among whites with lower socioeconomic status. Moreover, Hong et al. [34] reported that ET-1 levels were higher in the low and middle social classes as compared with the upper class. Last, the different definitions of NTG and the difference in the ET-1 measurements (in-house RIA versus ELISA, etc.) may also bring some influence on the outcome.

Although a standard search strategy and a thorough computerized search method were applied, certain limitations of our meta-analysis should be considered. First, our meta-analysis included only studies with accessible full-text articles in English. Second, the studies differed widely in the study population characteristics and the measurement techniques. Third, the definitions of NTG across the studies we analyzed were different. Last, only ten eligible studies could be used for the meta-analysis while the number of cases/controls in each study was relatively limited.

In this meta-analysis, we confirmed that NTG and POAG patients have a higher plasma level of ET-1. Consequently, the possible involvement of vascular dysfunction in the pathogenesis of glaucoma and the potential utility of ET-1 as a predictive biomarker might be considered.

Competing Interests

There was no conflicting relationship existing for any author.

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this study was provided by Shanghai Health Bureau (20124093), Fudan University (EENT-2009-21), the Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81020108017), and the State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81430007).

References

H. A. Quigley and A. T. Broman, “The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 262–267, 2006.

K. E. Kim and K. Park, “Update on the prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and monitoring of normal-tension glaucoma,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 2016.

T. Y. Wong and P. Mitchell, “The eye in hypertension,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9559, pp. 425–435, 2007.

M. Schulzer and Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group, “The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 498–505, 1998.

C. D. Phelps and J. J. Corbett, “Migraine and low-tension glaucoma. A case-control study,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1105–1108, 1985.

S. M. Drance, G. R. Douglas, K. Wijsman, M. Schulzer, and R. J. Britton, “Response of blood flow to warm and cold in normal and low-tension glaucoma patients,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 1988.

J. Flammer, I. O. Haefliger, S. Orgül, and T. Resink, “Vascular dysregulation: a principal risk factor for glaucomatous damage?” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 212–219, 1999.

J. Flammer and M. Mozaffarieh, “What is the present pathogenetic concept of glaucomatous optic neuropathy?” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 52, no. 6, supplement, pp. S162–S173, 2007.

K. S. Cunningham and A. I. Gotlieb, “The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 2005.

M. Yanagisawa, H. Kurihara, S. Kimura et al., “A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells,” Nature, vol. 332, no. 6163, pp. 411–415, 1988.

T. Yorio, R. Krishnamoorthy, and G. Prasanna, “Endothelin: is it a contributor to glaucoma pathophysiology?” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 259–270, 2002.

H.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Chang, W.-C. Chen, and H.-Y. Lane, “Association between plasma endothelin-1 and severity of different types of glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2013.

T. Sugiyama, S. Moriya, H. Oku, and I. Azuma, “Association of endothelin-1 with normal tension glaucoma: clinical and fundamental studies,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 39, no. 1, supplement, pp. S49–S56, 1995.

N. Y. Lee, H.-Y. L. Park, C. K. Park, and M. D. Ahn, “Analysis of systemic endothelin-1, matrix metalloproteinase-9, macrophage chemoattractant protein-1, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in normal-tension glaucoma,” Current Eye Research, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1121–1126, 2012.

M. Cellini, G. L. Possati, V. Profazio, M. Sbrocca, N. Caramazza, and R. Caramazza, “Color Doppler imaging and plasma levels of endothelin-1 in low-tension glaucoma,” Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, Supplement, vol. 75, no. 224, pp. 11–13, 1997.

F. Galassi, B. Giambene, and R. Varriale, “Systemic vascular dysregulation and retrobulbar hemodynamics in normal-tension glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 4467–4471, 2011.

S. Kunimatsu, C. Mayama, A. Tomidokoro, and M. Araie, “Plasma endothelin-1 level in Japanese normal tension glaucoma patients,” Current Eye Research, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 727–731, 2006.

E. Henry, D. E. Newby, D. J. Webb, P. W. F. Hadoke, and C. J. O'Brien, “Altered endothelin-1 vasoreactivity in patients with untreated normal-pressure glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 2528–2532, 2006.

M. T. Nicolela, S. N. Ferrier, C. A. Morrison et al., “Effects of cold-induced vasospasm in glaucoma: the role of endothelin-1,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2565–2572, 2003.

M. Cellini, E. Strobbe, C. Gizzi, N. Balducci, P. G. Toschi, and E. C. Campos, “Endothelin-1 plasma levels and vascular endothelial dysfunction in primary open angle glaucoma,” Life Sciences, vol. 91, no. 13-14, pp. 699–702, 2012.

G. Holló, P. Lakatos, and K. Farkas, “Cold pressor test and plasma endothelin-1 concentration in primary open-angle and capsular glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 1998.

P. Mitchell, A. J. Lee, E. Rochtchina, and J. J. Wang, “Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: The Blue Mountains Eye Study,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 319–326, 2004.

L. Bonomi, G. Marchini, M. Marraffa, P. Bernardi, R. Morbio, and A. Varotto, “Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1287–1293, 2000.

A. J. Lee, J. J. Wang, A. Kifley, and P. Mitchell, “Open-angle glaucoma and cardiovascular mortality. The Blue Mountains Eye Study,” Ophthalmology, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1069–1076, 2006.

W. M. Dismuke, J. Liang, D. R. Overby, and W. D. Stamer, “Concentration-related effects of nitric oxide and endothelin-1 on human trabecular meshwork cell contractility,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 120, pp. 28–35, 2014.

R. Rosenthal, L. Choritz, R. Zorn et al., “Endothelin receptor B in trabecular meshwork,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 482–491, 2007.

R. Karadag, R. Yagci, B. Aydin et al., “Effects of erytropoietin treatment and hemodialysis on the serum endothelin level and intraocular pressure of hemodialysis patients,” International Ophthalmology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 385–388, 2009.

J. T. Ernest, “Pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic nerve disease,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 73, pp. 366–388, 1975.

J. Flammer, M. Pache, and T. Resink, “Vasospasm, its role in the pathogenesis of diseases with particular reference to the eye,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 319–349, 2001.

F. A. Treiber, G. K. Kapuku, H. Davis, J. S. Pollock, and D. M. Pollock, “Plasma endothelin-1 release during acute stress: role of ethnicity and sex,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 707–713, 2002.

B. Hartley, F. A. Treiber, D. Ludwig, and G. Kapuku, “Correlates of femoral artery flow mediated dilation in a multi-ethnic sample of 12- to 26-year-olds,” Ethnicity and Disease, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 227–232, 2004.

F. A. Treiber, R. W. Jackson, H. Davis et al., “Racial differences in endothelin-1 at rest and in response to acute stress in adolescent males,” Hypertension, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 722–725, 2000.

D. C. Cooper, P. J. Mills, W. A. Bardwell, M. G. Ziegler, and J. E. Dimsdale, “The effects of ethnic discrimination and socioeconomic status on endothelin-1 among blacks and whites,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 698–704, 2009.

S. Hong, R. A. Nelesen, P. L. Krohn, P. J. Mills, and J. E. Dimsdale, “The association of social status and blood pressure with markers of vascular inflammation,” Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 517–523, 2006.