Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2792103, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2792103

Research Article

Macular Pigment Optical Density in Chinese Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Using the One-Wavelength Reflectometry Method

Yuying Ji, Chengguo Zuo, Mingkai Lin, Xiongze Zhang, Miaoling Li, Lan Mi, Bing Liu, and Feng Wen

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China

Received 20 December 2015; Revised 14 March 2016; Accepted 23 March 2016

Academic Editor: Vicente Zanon-Moreno

Copyright © 2016 Yuying Ji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Purpose. To investigate macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and its relationship with retinal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients using the one-wavelength reflectometry method. Methods. A total of 30 eyes from 30 POAG patients (18 males and 12 females, mean age ) and 52 eyes from 52 controls (27 males and 25 females, mean age ) were included in this prospective, observational, case-control study. MPOD was measured in a 7-degree area using one-wavelength reflectometry method. Two parameters, max and mean optical density (OD), were used for analyses. Spectral-domain-optical coherence tomography was used to measure retinal thickness, including central retinal thickness (CRT), the macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), and the circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). Results. Both maxOD and meanOD were significantly reduced in POAG patients compared with normal subjects (). GCC, CRT, and RNFL thicknesses were also significantly reduced in POAG patients (). GCC thickness had a positive relationship with MPOD. Conclusions. MPOD within the 7-degree area was significantly lower in Chinese POAG patients than in control subjects, and GCC thickness was significantly and positively associated with MPOD. Whether the observed lower MPOD in POAG contributes to the disease process or is secondary to pathological changes caused by the disease (such as loss of ganglion cells) warrants further and longitudinal study.

1. Introduction

Macular pigment (MP) is composed of lutein, zeaxanthin, and mesozeaxanthin. MP has a peak distribution in the fovea of the retina. The concentration of xanthophylls in the peripheral retinal is 100-fold less than that of the fovea [1]. Lutein and zeaxanthin are located in the Henle fiber layer, the inner retinal layer, and the rod outer segment in mature retinal tissues [2–4]. MP protects the retina by filtering blue light and quenching singlet oxygen [5, 6]. Two categories of methods are primarily available to measure macular pigment optical density (MPOD): the psychological technique and objective technique [7]. The one-wavelength reflectometry method is a new objective method covering a 7-degree area that contains the majority of MP [2, 8]. Potential factors associated with MPOD include age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and smoking status [9–12].

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy characterized by retinal ganglion cell death and can result in irreversible and progressive vision and visual field loss which affects millions of people worldwide. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements and visual field tests are the most commonly used methods to estimate and evaluate the extent of the disease. The nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, and inner plexiform layer constitute the ganglion cell complex (GCC), corresponding to the axons, cell bodies, and dendrites of the retinal ganglion cell, respectively [13]. Researchers have demonstrated some macular parameters where GCC exhibit similar diagnostic powers compared with peripapillary RNFL parameters [14–16].

Limited studies have investigated MPOD in glaucoma. Recently two studies have shown that MPOD in open angle glaucoma patients is significantly reduced compared with normal people using the psychophysical method within 1-degree area [17, 18]. MPOD in Chinese primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients has not been investigated yet using the one-wavelength reflectometry method. We conducted this study to verify whether MP is lower in Chinese primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients using the one-wavelength reflectometry method and to observe the correlations between MPOD and demographic and retinal thickness factors.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a prospective, observational, case-control study. The study adhered to the tenets of the declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center approved this research, and all participants provided written informed consent.

2.1. Subjects

Patients were recruited from the glaucoma outpatient department in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center. The control group consisted of volunteers from the outpatient department with normal results upon ocular examination. POAG was defined as adult onset, with an open, normal-appearing anterior chamber angle and typical optic nerve head damage and/or glaucomatous visual field damage without other known explanations. All participants underwent a detailed examination, including visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, direct ophthalmoscopy, optometry, and noncontact tonometry. The cup to disc ratio (C/D) was recorded. Exclusion criteria included a best-corrected visual acuity less than 63 letters using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) chart, cornea disease, cataract, artificial lens, refractive error between −6.0 D and +6.0 D, fundus disease, any disease that may influence the refracting media of the eye (e.g., severe vitreous opacities), uncontrolled hypertension, and a medical history that may influence the absorption of xanthophylls such as lutein supplementation.

Other demographic data were also collected including age, gender, height, weight, and smoking status. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared.

2.2. MPOD Measurement

A one-wavelength fundus reflectance method (Visucam 200; Carl Zeiss Meditec) was used for detection of MPOD as previously described [12]. The right or left eye was randomly selected for measurement. All subjects’ pupils were dilated to a minimum diameter of 7 mm using 1% tropicamide. The parameters and profiles of MPOD in a 7-degree eccentricity that corresponded to a 4 mm diameter were evaluated and output. Parameters included max and mean optical density (OD), volume, and area. MaxOD and meanOD with units “d.u.” (initial of density units) were used for the analyses.

2.3. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurement

All subjects underwent a spectral-domain-OCT examination (SD-OCT, OSE-200, MOPTIM, Shenzhen, China). We acquired GCC thickness and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements using the 6-line scan. This scan protocol was centered on the fovea and consisted of 29000 A-scans over a 6 mm circle area with three concentric circles with diameters of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 6 mm, respectively. We used the central 6 mm area for the analysis including total, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal area in OCT. The distance from the internal limiting membrane and outer edge of the outer plexiform layer was defined as GCC thickness. CRT thickness was defined as distance between the internal limiting membrane and the inner edge of the retinal pigment epithelium. Outer retinal (OR) thickness was calculated by subtracting GCC thickness from CRT. Circumpapillary RNFL scans were obtained using the standard 3.4 mm 12-degree circumpapillary nerve fiber layer scan protocol. We recorded superior, inferior, nasal, temporal, and total RNFL thickness.

2.4. Visual Field Test and Disease Severity

All POAG patients underwent the visual field test using the 30-2 Threshold Test on the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). According to the mean deviation (MD) values generated by the software, three groups of disease severity were classified: the mild group with MD > −6 dB, the moderate group with MD between −6 and −12 dB, and the severe group with MD < −12 dB.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS 20.0 software (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All continuous variables were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Fisher’s exact test or Chi-square test was used for the analysis of categorical variables. Two independent samples -test was used to assess the differences between the two groups. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to estimate the relationships between MPOD and retinal thickness in all subjects. Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship among demographic factors, retinal thickness, and MPOD. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 30 eyes from 30 POAG patients and 52 eyes from 52 normal participants were included in the study. The participants were all from the Chinese Han population. Table 1 presents the basic characteristics of the subjects. No differences in age, sex, BMI, and smoking status were noted between the two groups. The cup to disc ratio was in POAG group and in the control group.

Table 1: Characteristics of the study eyes.

POAG ()
Control ()

Mean age ± SD (y) (range)
47.27 ± 16.93 (20–76)
49.54 ± 19.15 (10–77)
0.413

Sex, (male/female)
18/12
27/25
0.500

Smoking, (yes/no)
7/23
5/47
0.112

BMI ± SD (range)
22.24 ± 2.46 (19.10–28.32)
21.24 ± 2.97 (15.31–28.60)
0.086

C/D ± SD
0.83 ± 0.15
0.32 ± 0.12
<0.001

BMI: body mass index.

C/D: cup to disc ratio.

3.1. MPOD in the POAG and Control Groups

In the POAG group, maxOD was  d.u. and meanOD was  d.u. In the control group, maxOD was  d.u. and meanOD was  d.u. MPOD in the glaucoma group was significantly reduced compared with the control group (Table 2).

Table 2: Comparison of macular pigment optical density values in two groups.

POAG
Control

Mean
SD
Mean
SD

MaxOD (d.u.)
0.301
0.076
0.370
0.056
<0.001

MeanOD (d.u.)
0.116
0.033
0.137
0.026
<0.001

d.u.: (density units) the unit for maxOD and meanOD.

3.2. OCT Measurements of the Glaucoma and Control Groups

OCT measurements values are presented in Table 3. Compared with the control groups, GCC, CRT, and RNFL thicknesses were significantly thinner in the glaucoma groups (all values < 0.001). No significant difference in OR thickness was noted between the two groups ().

Table 3: Retinal thickness values and comparison of study subjects.

POAG
Control

Mean, µm
SD, µm
Mean, µm
SD, µm

GCC

    6 mm
80.80
17.33
113.10
7.71
<0.001

    Superior
82.92
18.47
116.95
9.00
<0.001

    Inferior
80.89
19.10
116.40
8.16
<0.001

    Nasal
86.01
21.66
119.71
9.43
<0.001

    Temporal
77.65
13.12
96.91
7.22
<0.001

CRT

    6 mm
290.86
26.74
328.05
17.42
0.021

    Superior
293.98
29.47
333.12
18.03
<0.001

    Inferior
285.61
28.80
327.45
19.86
<0.001

    Nasal
299.05
30.58
338.07
19.81
0.001

    Temporal
288.80
26.54
320.88
16.76
<0.001

OR

    6 mm
210.06
15.40
214.95
12.64
0.271

    Superior
211.06
17.74
216.18
12.81
0.135

    Inferior
204.72
14.83
211.05
14.69
0.065

    Nasal
213.04
16.78
218.35
15.74
0.155

    Temporal
211.15
19.66
223.97
13.90
0.308

RNFL

    Total
70.20
10.84
97.93
8.33
<0.001

    Superior
78.25
15.74
113.71
16.95
<0.001

    Inferior
78.01
21.06
128.71
16.59
<0.001

    Nasal
58.00
8.47
68.38
6.57
<0.001

    Temporal
66.53
11.23
81.42
10.60
<0.001

GCC: ganglion cell complex.

CRT: central retinal thickness.

OR: outer retinal thickness (CRT minus GCC).

RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer.

3.3. Correlation between MPOD and Retinal Thickness

Table 4 presents the Pearson correlation results. The inferior, temporal, and total GCC thickness positively correlated with maxOD in POAG patients (, , and , resp.). A positive relationship also existed between inferior outer retinal thickness and maxOD and meanOD in POAG patients (, , resp.). No significant correlations were noted between retinal thickness parameters and MPOD in the control group. RNFL did not correlate with MPOD in the POAG or control group.

Table 4: Pearson correlations between MPOD and retinal thickness in the POAG and control groups.

POAG
Control

MaxOD
MeanOD
MaxOD
MeanOD

GCC

    6 mm
0.423
0.020
0.266
0.155
−0.150
0.289
−0.141
0.318

    Superior
0.334
0.071
0.174
0.357
−0.098
0.490
−0.101
0.476

    Inferior
0.509
0.004
0.355
0.054
−0.225
0.109
−0.189
0.181

    Nasal
0.342
0.065
0.207
0.272
−0.153
0.278
−0.131
0.356

    Temporal
0.521
0.003
0.373
0.037
0.038
0.789
0.038
0.790

OR

    6 mm
0.359
0.051
0.113
0.551
−0.081
0.570
−0.138
0.330

    Superior
0.212
0.261
0.144
0.449
−0.159
0.261
−0.201
0.152

    Inferior
0.451
0.012
0.387
0.035
0.007
0.961
−0.057
0.688

    Nasal
0.321
0.083
0.281
0.133
−0.023
0.869
−0.092
0.516

    Temporal
0.333
0.073
0.249
0.185
−0.216
0.124
−0.252
0.071

RNFL

    Total
0.236
0.210
0.113
0.551
0.020
0.891
0.002
0.987

    Superior
0.027
0.886
−0.046
0.809
0.022
0.875
−0.020
0.890

    Inferior
0.212
0.262
0.112
0.557
0.107
0.449
0.090
0.525

    Nasal
0.181
0.338
0.088
0.642
−0.196
0.164
−0.134
0.344

    Temporal
0.338
0.068
0.226
0.230
0.107
0.450
0.071
0.617

GCC: ganglion cell complex.

OR: outer retinal thickness (values of CRT subtracting GCC).

RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer.

Table 5 presents the multiple linear regression results. Age and BMI significantly correlated with maxOD and meanOD (for age, , and for BMI, , , resp.). Furthermore, GCC thickness is positively related to MPOD (for maxOD, , and for meanOD, ). Figure 1 presents a scatter plot depicting the relationship in a direct manner. Figure 2 includes classic examples of patients. Patients in the right column had smaller cup to disc ratios, higher MPOD values, and deeper GCC thickness color than patients in the left column.

Table 5: Multiple linear regression model showing the relationship between age, sex, BMI, retinal thickness, maxOD, and meanOD.

Variables
MaxOD
MeanOD

Age
0.408
<0.001
0.591
<0.001

Sex
0.167
0.089
0.172
0.066

BMI
−0.188
0.042
−0.193
0.028

smoking
0.030
0.763
0.047
0.622

GCC
0.454
<0.001
0.316
0.001

OR
0.029
0.763
0.010
0.909

BMI: body mass index.

GCC: ganglion cell complex.

OR: outer retinal thickness (CRT minus GCC).

(a)

(b)

Figure 1: Scatter plot depicting the correlation between GCC thickness and MPOD. (a) Positive relation between maxOD and GCC. (b) Positive relation between meanOD and GCC.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 2: Patient examples of MPOD and GCC. (a) Fundus photography of case 1 with a cup to disc ratio of approximately 0.6. (b) Fundus photography of case 2 with a cup to disc ratio of approximately 0.9. (c and d) MPOD profile indicating that case 1 (c) exhibits a higher MPOD than case 2 (d) (red arrow). (e and f) GCC profile indicating that case 1 (e) exhibits a thicker GCC than case 2 (f) (deeper blue means thicker thickness).

3.4. Correlation between MPOD and MD in POAG Patients

Pearson correlation revealed that no significant relation exists between MPOD values and MD (for maxOD, , and for meanOD, ).

4. Discussion

The study was designed to investigate the distribution of MP in Chinese POAG patients using an objective, one-wavelength reflectometry method and to explore the possible associations between MPOD levels and POAG indices. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has employed this objective method to explore the MPOD in Chinese POAG patients.

The present study found that MPOD in POAG patients was significantly lower than normal individuals after adjustment for age, BMI, and smoking status. These results are consistent with a previous study conducted in Ireland [17, 18]. It strengthened the fact that MPOD did decrease in glaucoma. Furthermore, in Asian POAG patients, MPOD exhibited the same tendency for change as in Caucasian individuals. The study also found that GCC thickness and RNFL thickness were statistically reduced in POAG patients. Further analysis by Pearson correlation, multiple linear regression, and scatter plot indicated that GCC thickness was positively associated with MPOD. The result was similar to that reported for 88 open angle glaucoma patients that demonstrated that eyes with foveal involvement exhibited lower MPOD than eyes with no foveal involvement [18].

Two possibilities potentially explain why MPOD is reduced in POAG patients. First, lower MPOD values contribute to the risk of disease. Lutein quenches the active oxygen [5]. Numerous studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in the process of glaucoma [19]. It is hypothesized that oxidative stress plays an early role in the process of glaucomatous optic neuropathy [20]. Oxidative DNA damage is statistically increased in POAG patients compared with normal individuals and antioxidant enzymes are significantly reduced in both blood and serum samples [21–23]. Thus, individuals with lower MPOD values have weaker antioxidant defenses against the glaucomatous process and are more likely to develop glaucoma. Second, loss of “housing” for MP due to loss of the retinal nerve fiber layer may explain reduced MPOD in POAG patient. In addition to the main distribution in the outer plexiform layer of the fovea, MP is also located in the inner retinal layer of the parafoveal intracellular [2, 3]. In glaucoma patients, retinal ganglion cells apoptosis and loss of the retinal nerve fiber layer caused reduced MP localization and a reduction in MP.

Regardless of the cause, supplementation should be advantageous. MP plays an important role in improving glare disability and photo stress recovery. In addition, lutein and zeaxanthin supplementation can improve visual performance in glares [24]. MP can also increase contrast sensitivity [25, 26]. Both of these issues are major problem in POAG patients. Numerous studies suggest that POAG patients had poor performance on many psychophysical tests especially contrast sensitivity and glare disability [27, 28].

The one-wavelength technique we adopted in this study calculated MPOD based on a fundus image generated by a single 460 nm wavelength. The technique is simple and objective with good reproducibility [8, 29]. However, some limitations were also noted. Stray light through an aging lens impacted on the results of the reflectometry method, and a strong cataract impact was noted with the one-wavelength method [7, 8, 30]. Several measures were obtained to minimize the impact. The cataracts were excluded. The ages of POAG patients and normal controls were matched to each other. In multiple linear regression, age was adjusted. Furthermore, the intensity of the nerve fiber layer has an impact on the reflectance [31]. Thus, thinner GCCs would produce less reflectance and a lower MPOD using reflectometry method.

There were some limitations of our study. We analyzed a small sample size without further classification and periodization of glaucoma. Further investigations to explore whether MP is related to the disease are expected.

In conclusion, using the one-wavelength reflectometry method, POAG patients had lower MPOD in this Chinese cohort. GCC thickness was positively related to MPOD. A further study exploring the causal relationship between MPOD and glaucoma is needed.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Yuying Ji and Chengguo Zuo contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the patients and controls for their participation in this study. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants nos. 81271011, 81200705, and 81400426) and the Fundamental Research Funds of State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology.

References

S. S. Ahmed, M. N. Lott, and D. M. Marcus, “The macular xanthophylls,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 183–193, 2005.

R. A. Bone, J. T. Landrum, L. Fernandez, and S. L. Tarsis, “Analysis of the macular pigment by HPLC: retinal distribution and age study,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 843–849, 1988.

L. M. Rapp, S. S. Maple, and J. H. Choi, “Lutein and zeaxanthin concentrations in rod outer segment membranes from perifoveal and peripheral human retina,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1200–1209, 2000.

M. Trieschmann, F. J. G. M. van Kuijk, R. Alexander et al., “Macular pigment in the human retina: histological evaluation of localization and distribution,” Eye, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 132–137, 2008.

B. Li, F. Ahmed, and P. S. Bernstein, “Studies on the singlet oxygen scavenging mechanism of human macular pigment,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 504, no. 1, pp. 56–60, 2010.

A. Junghans, H. Sies, and W. Stahl, “Macular pigments lutein and zeaxanthin as blue light filters studied in liposomes,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 391, no. 2, pp. 160–164, 2001.

O. Howells, F. Eperjesi, and H. Bartlett, “Measuring macular pigment optical density in vivo: a review of techniques,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 315–347, 2011.

D. Schweitzer, S. Jentsch, J. Dawczynski, M. Hammer, U. E. K. Wolf-Schnurrbusch, and S. Wolf, “Simple and objective method for routine detection of the macular pigment xanthophyll,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 15, no. 6, Article ID 061714, 2010.

V. C. Lima, R. B. Rosen, T. S. Prata et al., “Association of age and macular pigment optical density using dual-wavelength autofluorescence imaging,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 7, pp. 685–690, 2013.

A. Gupta, R. Raman, S. Biswas, R. Rajan, V. Kulothungan, and T. Sharma, “Association between various types of obesity and macular pigment optical density,” Eye, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 259–266, 2012.

B. R. Hammond Jr., J. Curran-Celentano, S. Judd et al., “Sex differences in macular pigment optical density: relation to plasma carotenoid concentrations and dietary patterns,” Vision Research, vol. 36, no. 13, pp. 2001–2012, 1996.

Y. Ji, X. Zhang, K. Wu et al., “Macular pigment optical density in a healthy Chinese population,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. e550–e555, 2015.

P. V. Le, O. Tan, V. Chopra et al., “Regional correlation among ganglion cell complex, nerve fiber layer, and visual field loss in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 4287–4295, 2013.

J. W. Cho, K. R. Sung, S. Lee et al., “Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 12, pp. 6401–6407, 2010.

N. R. Kim, S. Hong, J. H. Kim, S. S. Rho, G. J. Seong, and C. Y. Kim, “Comparison of macular ganglion cell complex thickness by Fourier-domain OCT in normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2013.

N. R. Kim, E. S. Lee, G. J. Seong, J. H. Kim, H. G. An, and C. Y. Kim, “Structure-function relationship and diagnostic value of macular ganglion cell complex measurement using fourier-domain OCT in glaucoma,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 4646–4651, 2010.

E. Igras, J. Loughman, M. Ratzlaff, R. O'Caoimh, and C. O'Brien, “Evidence of lower macular pigment optical density in chronic open angle glaucoma,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 8, pp. 994–998, 2013.

W. F. Siah, J. Loughman, and C. O'Brien, “Lower macular pigment optical density in foveal-involved glaucoma,” Ophthalmology, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 2029–2037, 2015.

V. Chrysostomou, F. Rezania, I. A. Trounce, and J. G. Crowston, “Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in glaucoma,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2013.

M. D. Pinazo-Durán, V. Zanón-Moreno, J. J. García-Medina, and R. Gallego-Pinazo, “Evaluation of presumptive biomarkers of oxidative stress, immune response and apoptosis in primary open-angle glaucoma,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 98–107, 2013.

C. Nucci, D. Di Pierro, C. Varesi et al., “Increased malondialdehyde concentration and reduced total antioxidant capacity in aqueous humor and blood samples from patients with glaucoma,” Molecular Vision, vol. 19, pp. 1841–1846, 2013.

I. Majsterek, K. Malinowska, M. Stanczyk et al., “Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in pathogenesis of primary open-angle glaucoma,” Experimental and Molecular Pathology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 231–237, 2011.

A. Bagnis, A. Izzotti, M. Centofanti, and S. C. Saccà, “Aqueous humor oxidative stress proteomic levels in primary open angle glaucoma,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 103, pp. 55–62, 2012.

J. M. Stringham and B. R. Hammond, “Macular pigment and visual performance under glare conditions,” Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 82–88, 2008.

B. R. Hammond, B. R. Wooten, M. Engles, and J. C. Wong, “The influence of filtering by the macular carotenoids on contrast sensitivity measured under simulated blue haze conditions,” Vision Research, vol. 63, pp. 58–62, 2012.

U. E. Wolf-Schnurrbusch, M. S. Zinkernagel, M. R. Munk, A. Ebneter, and S. Wolf, “Oral lutein supplementation enhances macular pigment density and contrast sensitivity but not in combination with polyunsaturated fatty acids,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 56, no. 13, pp. 8069–8074, 2015.

P. Nelson, P. Aspinall, O. Papasouliotis, B. Worton, and C. O'Brien, “Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 139–150, 2003.

K. Hirooka, S. Sato, E. Nitta, and A. Tsujikawa, “The relationship between vision-related quality of life and visual function in glaucoma patients,” Journal of Glaucoma, 2016.

C. Creuzot-Garcher, P. Koehrer, C. Picot, S. Aho, and A. M. Bron, “Comparison of two methods to measure macular pigment optical density in healthy subjects,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2941–2946, 2014.

B. Komar, F. G. Rauscher, R. Wiedemann, and J. Dawczynski, “Macular pigment optical density measurements by one-wavelength reflection photometry—influence of cataract surgery on the measurement results,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 252, no. 11, pp. 1717–1727, 2014.

T. T. J. M. Berendschot, P. J. DeLint, and D. Van Norren, “Fundus reflectance—historical and present ideas,” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 171–200, 2003.