Journal of Pregnancy
Volume 2020 (2020), Article ID 2856502, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2856502

Research Article

Magnitude of Induced Abortion and Associated Factors among Female Students of Hawassa University, Southern Region, Ethiopia, 2019

Addisu Tadesse Sahile¹ and Mieraf Shiferaw Beyene²

¹Department of Public Health, Unity University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
²Department of Public Health, Universal Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Correspondence should be addressed to Addisu Tadesse Sahile; sahdis91@gmail.com

Received 14 September 2019; Revised 16 August 2020; Accepted 26 August 2020; Published 22 September 2020

Academic Editor: Luca Marozio

Copyright © 2020 Addisu Tadesse Sahile and Mieraf Shiferaw Beyene. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Objectives. This study was aimed at assessing the magnitude of induced abortion and associated factors among students in Hawassa University, southern region, Ethiopia, 2019. Methods. An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among a total of 422 students selected on the bases of a probability simple random sampling method. A pretested structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Analysis was made with SPSS 20. Descriptive summary and inferential statistics (binary logistic regression) were used with a 95% CI and value of less than 5% as a level of significance. Findings were presented in tables, figure, and texts. Confidentiality of information was also secured. Results. The prevalence of induced abortion in the study setting was 68.7% (95% CI: 64.15%-73.2%). Participants who used emergency contraceptives had 12 times higher odds of undergoing abortion than those who did not use emergency contraceptives at AOR: 11.95, 95% CI: 5.615-25.326, . Conclusions. A higher prevalence of induced abortion was observed in the study setting. Contraceptive use was the predictor of induced abortion identified. Concerned bodies were recommended to work on the identified determinant of induced abortion in the study setting.

1. Introduction

Abortion has been an old experience carried out so far by human beings. It has been practiced throughout the world illegally. Globally, it was estimated that around 30 million induced abortions were performed annually [1]. Globally, from 210 million pregnancies that occur annually, about 22% end up in induced abortion [2].

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), many women use abortion as a means of family planning methods. With restrictive abortion laws and limited contraceptive access, unsafe abortion accounted for 13% of maternal deaths in SSA [3]. About 9% of maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa are attributed to complications of unsafe abortion [4].

An estimated 620,300 induced abortions were performed in Ethiopia annually. The annual abortion rate was 28 per 1,000 women aged 15-49, with the highest in urban areas [5]. Induced abortion is one of the mechanisms to deal with unwanted pregnancy. The university students in Ethiopia dealt with unwanted pregnancy by undertaking induced abortion to terminate pregnancy secretly to avoid stigma following premarital pregnancy [6].

Ethiopia is one of the countries that allowed women to obtain safe and legal abortion under some conditions; these conditions included the following: if the pregnancy was from rape, if there is physical or mental disability, if it would put women on physical health or life risk, or if the woman is younger than 18 and unprepared to give birth [7].

Though most studies in Ethiopia were health facility-based on patients seeking health service, reproductive health service, particularly abortion-related issues, was not well emphasized. So, the current study assessed the magnitude of induced abortion and associated factors among students at Hawassa University during the year 2019.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Study Setting and Period

The study was conducted in Hawassa University, located in Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People’s Region (SNNPR). It is located 278 kilometers south of Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. The university is one of the governmental universities located in the southern region of Ethiopia. The university has 7 colleges, with a total of 155,965 populations of which 19,500 were female population. The study was conducted from February to May 2019. An institutional-based cross-sectional study was done. The female students in Hawassa University during the year of 2018/2019 were the source population whereas female students of Hawassa University who were available from February to May 2019 were the study population. Participants were selected on the basis of a simple random sampling technique, where the sampling frame was once determined from registries of the university. Though there were conducted studies, the researcher took 50%, as an estimator of prevalence of induced abortion, to have the maximum sample size. A single population proportion formula was utilized to compute the sample size with its respective standard deviation and margin of error. Accordingly, with the consideration of a 10% nonresponse rate, the final sample was found at 422. A structured pretested self-administered questionnaire was employed among the participants in Amharic (original language) after checking for consistency with English by linguistic professionals. The tool was first developed by the researchers after rigorous reviewing of literatures on the topic, and then, inputs of senior researchers were incorporated into the developed tool. For the coherence, clarity, and conciseness of the questionnaire, native speakers reviewed the tool. The outcome variable was induced abortion measured as follows: abortion is termination of pregnancy before 28 weeks of pregnancy [8]. For the purpose of the current study, induced abortion is “students who terminated their pregnancy intentionally either on their own or by another person” [9].

2.2. Statistical Analysis

Data was entered and further analyzed with SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were employed as a summary measure. Associations between covariates and dependent variables were investigated with binary logistic regression with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) and value less than 5% as the level of significance. Bivariate logistic regression was done first; then, to take control of effects of confounding variables, multivariate logistic regression was also done.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Respondents

Four hundred twenty-two participants participated in this study with a 100% response rate. Regarding years of education, 17%, 41.2%, 30.6%, 8.8%, and 5.5% of the students were 1st year, 2nd year, 3rd year, 4th year, and 5th year students, respectively. Concerning the departments, 32% were engineering, 15.6% were health, and 33.4% were social science, and the remaining 11.1% were agriculture students. More than half (61.6%) of students lived in the campus dormitory; 37.7% of students lived outside the campus. Less than half (42.2%) of students got income from their parents, 29.9% of the students got an income from relatives, and 27.7% of students got income from other sources (Table 1).

Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of female students in Hawassa University, SNNPR, Ethiopia, April 2019.

Characteristics
Categories
Number
%

Age in years
18-20
25
5.9

21-23
344
81.5

24-26
53
12.6

Year of education
1st year
74
17.5

2nd year
174
41.2

3rd year
129
30.6

4th year
37
8.8

5th year
8
1.9

Respondent department
Engineering
135
32.0

Health
66
15.6

Social science
141
33.4

Agriculture
47
11.1

Other
33
7.8

Respondent places they live
In the campus dormitory
260
61.6

Outside the campus
159
37.7

With my parents
3
7

Respondent source of income
Parents
179
42.4

Relatives
126
29.9

Others
117
27.7

Friends, boyfriends, and sugar daddy.

3.2. Behavioral Characteristics of Participants

Eighty-two percent of students had history of sexual intercourse. The reasons behind their start of sexual intercourse were the following: 40.3% influence of economic problems, 46.4% peer pressure, 44.1% alcohol consumption, 38.9% personal desire, and 34.8 influence of khat or drugs (Table 2).

Table 2: Behavioral characteristics of female students at Hawassa University, SNNPR, Ethiopia, April 2019.

Variables
Categories
Frequency
%

Had history of sexual intercourse
Yes
347
82.2

No
75
17.8

Peer pressure was the reason for intention to have sexual intercourse
Yes
196
46.4

No
226
53.6

Personal desire was the reason for intention to have sexual intercourse
Yes
164
38.9

No
258
61.1

Influence of alcohol was the reason for initiation of sexual intercourse
Yes
186
44.1

No
236
55.9

Influence of khat or drug was the reason for initiation of sexual intercourse
Yes
147
34.8

No
275
65.2

Economic problem was the reason for initiation of sexual intercourse
Yes
170
40.3

No
252
59.7

Other factors were the reason for initiation of sexual intercourse
Yes
169
40.0

No
253
60.0

3.3. Participant’s Knowledge about Abortion

As to respondent view about whether participants had heard about emergency contraceptives, majority 406 (96%) had information about it, with most 326 (77%) of the respondents having used the drugs. More than half 265 (62%) of respondents reported that they knew where abortion is legally conducted. Most (77%) of the respondents reported that they used emergency contraceptives following sexual intercourse. Regarding the experience of abortion by the study participants, most (69%) of the participants reported that they had undertaken induced abortion, of which more than half (54%) of the participants used medication for termination of the pregnancy. More than half (53%) of the participants reported that holding off sexual intercourse was their choice when their partner was unwilling to use a condom (Table 3).

Table 3: Participants’ knowledge of a place and complication of abortion at Hawassa University, SNNPR, Ethiopia, April 2019.

Characteristics
Number
%

Have you heard about emergency contraceptive drug?
Yes
406
96.2

No
9
2.1

Not sure
7
1.7

Did you use emergency contraceptive following sex?
Yes
326
77.3

No
96
22.7

Have you had abortion?
Yes
290
68.7

No
132
31.3

Reasons for undertaking abortion
Because it affects my education
98
33.7

Because I cannot raise a child
96
33.1

To protect social stigma
65
22.4

Because I got pregnant due to sexual assault
22
7.6

Others
11
3.2

Did you know where abortion is performed legally?
Yes
265
62.8

No
156
37.0

Am not sure
1
0.2

Respondent place of performing abortion
Community pharmacy
76
26.4

Health center
104
35.8

Private clinic
109
37.5

Traditional
1
0.3

How long since undertaking of abortion?
1 month
72
24.8

2 months
114
39.3

3 months
90
31.0

Do not know
14
4.9

Did you face infection during abortion?
Yes
87
30.0

No
203
70.0

Did you face bleeding during abortion?
Yes
15
5.1

No
275
94.9

Type of procedure
Medication
156
53.8

Instrument
134
46.2

If your partner does not volunteer to use a condom, what would you do?
Stop sexual intercourse
222
52.6

Try to convince them to use condom
177
41.9

Practice sexual intercourse without using condom
23
5.5

3.4. Magnitude and Associated Factors of Induced Abortion

The magnitude of induced abortion in the study setting was 68.7% (95% CI: 64.15%-73.2%), whereas only less than one-third (31.3%) did not undergo induced abortion (Figure 1). The age of participants, year of education, alcohol use, and use of emergency contraceptives have independently shown a statistical association with the occurrence of induced abortion at value less than 5%. But in the multivariate logistic regression, only emergency contraceptive use was statistically associated with the occurrence of induced abortion. Participants who used emergency contraceptives had 12 times higher odds of taking induced abortion than those who did not use emergency contraceptives (AOR: 11.95, 95% CI: 5.615-25.326, ) (Table 4).

Figure 1: Magnitude of induced abortion of female students at Hawassa University, SNNPR, Ethiopia, April 2019.

Table 4: Factors associated with induced abortion among Hawassa University students, SNNPR, Ethiopia, April 2019.

Characteristics

Abortion
COR (95% CI)
value
AOR (95% CI)
value

Yes
No

Age (grouped)
18-20
11
14
1
0.015
1
0.369

21-23
238
106
0.350 (0.154-0.796)
0.012
2.546 (0.682-9.505)
0.164

24-26
41
12
0.230 (0.083-0.637)
0.005
2.717 (0.588-12.558)
0.201

Years of education
1st year
34
40
1
0.000
1
0.023

2nd year
122
52
0.362 (0.207-0.635)
0.000
7.862 (0.437-141.384)
0.162

3rd year
96
33
0.292 (0.160-0.535)
0.000
4.276 (0.249-73.451)
0.317

4th year
31
6
0.165 (0.061-0.441)
0.000
3.753 (0.219-64.422)
0.362

5th year
7
1
0.121 (0.014-1.037)
0.054
0.816 (0.040-16.617)
0.895

Monthly income in birr
300-500
48
29
1
0.561
1
0.270

501-700
117
52
0.736 (0.418-1.294)
0.287
0.571 (0.274-1.190)
0.135

701-900
106
42
0.656 (0.366-1.175)
0.156
0.473 (0.216-1.032)
0.060

≥901
19
9
0.784 (0.313-1.962)
0.603
0.837 (0.269-2.607)
0.759

Alcohol use
Yes
152
34
3.175 (2.018-4.994)
0.000
0.730 (417-1.278)
0.271

No
138
98

Use of emergency contraceptives
Yes
272
54
21.827 (12.101-39.370)
0.000
11.95 (5.615-25.326)
0.000

No
18
78

Have reproductive health education
Yes
79
29
1.330 (0.818-2.163)
0.251
0.846 (0.453-1.580)
0.600

No
211
103

4. Discussion

The current study found a higher prevalence of induced abortion among university students observed at 68.7%, which was much higher than the findings of the health facility-based study in Guraghe zone of Ethiopia, which revealed the magnitude of induced abortion at 12.3% [9]. This variation might be due to variation in study settings.

The other study in Ethiopian university students revealed that the rate of induced abortion was found at 65 per 1,000 women. Students with history of alcohol use and first year students had higher risk of abortion than their counterparts. About 23.7% of students reported experience of sexual intercourse, and less than half (44%) of respondents reported ever hearing of emergency contraception, of which 36% of those with sexual experience ever used a condom [10], which was lower than the findings of the current study.

The prevalence of induced abortion among precollege students in Ethiopia was observed at 13.6% [11], which was lower than the findings of the current study. The finding from this study was much higher than the findings in China 8.13% [12], Cameroon 21% [13], southern Ethiopia 43.4% [14], Nigeria 51% [15], and Northwestern Ethiopia 4.8% [16]. This variation might be attributed to differences in the time of investigation of sample size, whereas the current finding was almost consistent with the study in Ghana 64% [17].

Having more than four pregnancies (, ) and age 30-34 years (, ) were found to be statistically associated with induced abortion [9]. But in the current study, contraceptive use was the only predictor of induced abortion.

In the other study, being in rural areas (, 95% CI: 1.04–1.39), ages 18-25 (, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99) and 30 or older (, 95% CI: 1.42–1.86), and single individuals (, 95% CI: 1.05–2.83) were more likely to experience induced abortion [12], where none of the variables showed any statistical association in the current study.

Evidences suggested that history of abortion and use of contraceptive methods were statistically interrelated with each other. Women who had history of abortion were more likely to be those using any methods of contraceptives. A study in Luanda, Angola, supported that history of induced abortion was associated with the use of contraceptive methods. Those women who had a history of induced abortion were 1.23 times more likely to use a modern contraceptive method as compared to those who never had abortion (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.10-1.36) [18].

Desire to stay in school (28%), fear of parents (24%), and shame of being pregnant (26%) were the major depicted determinants of induced abortion. Most of the participants were not aware of where abortion is allowed, and some of them had undertaken illegal abortion [13]. The other study in Cameroon depicted that the prevalence of induced abortion was found at 25% [19], of which the finding was lower than the finding of the current study.

The prevalence of induced abortion in this study was higher than findings from the following: 33.6% Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [20], 5% in Pakistan [21], and 17% in Iran [22].

A study at Felege Hiwot Hospital, Ethiopia, revealed that being nonmarried and student, age less than 24 years, and having previous history of induced abortion and low monthly income were independent predictors of induced abortion [23], whilst in this study, only emergency contraceptive use was statistically associated with the occurrence of induced abortion.

In the current study, participants who used emergency contraceptives had 12 times higher odds of undergoing abortion than those who did not use emergency contraceptives. Surprisingly, a higher magnitude of induced abortion was observed from the current study than most other previous studies.

5. Conclusions

A higher prevalence of induced abortion was observed in the study setting. Contraceptive use was the predictor of induced abortion. Participants who used emergency contraceptives had 12 times higher odds of undergoing induced abortion than those who did not use emergency contraceptives. Interventions focused on identified determinants could be recommended.

Data Availability

All the required data has been included within the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical clearance committee of Universal Medical College, prior to commencement of the study. Permit to undertake the study was also sought from the Hawassa University Research Review Committee. Confidentiality of the participants was secured through a coding system. The ethics approval was given in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Briefing about the study was highlighted by the data collector.

Consent

Consent for publication was secured from the study participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Addisu Tadesse Sahile was involved in the design, implementation, data collection, and statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. Mieraf Shiferaw Beyene was involved in the design, data collection, and review of scientific content of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Universal Medical College and Hawassa University who endorsed us to undertake the study. The authors gratefully thank study participants who participated in the study.

References

J. D. K. Ngowa, H. T. Neng, J. F. Domgue, C. J. Nsahlai, and J. M. Kasia, “Voluntary induced abortion in Cameroon: prevalence, reasons, and complications,” Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 475–480, 2015.

E. Ahman and I. Shah, Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008, World Health Organization, 2011.

A. Cohen, Access to Safe Abortion in the Developing World: Saving Lives while Advancing Rights, 2012.

L. Say, D. Chou, A. Gemmill et al., “Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis,” The Lancet Global Health, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. e323–e333, 2014.

A. M. Moore, Y. Gebrehiwot, T. Fetters et al., “The estimated incidence of induced abortion in Ethiopia, 2014: changes in the provision of services since 2008,” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 111–120, 2016.

K. M. Moland, H. Haukanes, G. Tadele, and A. Blystad, “The paradox of access-abortion law, policy and misoprostol,” Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, vol. 137, no. 2, 2018.

E. Bayeh, “Human rights in Ethiopia: an assessment on the law and practice of women’s rights,” Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2015.

B. Ganatra, O. Tuncalp, H. B. Johnston, B. R. Johnson Jr., A. M. Gulmezoglu, and M. Temmerman, “From Concept to Measurement: Operationalizing WHO's Definition of Unsafe Abortion,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 92, no. 3, p. 155, 2014.

G. Tesfaye, M. T. Hambisa, and A. Semahegn, “Induced abortion and associated factors in health facilities of Guraghe zone, southern Ethiopia,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2014, Article ID 295732, 8 pages, 2014.

A. A. Gelaye, K. N. Taye, and T. Mekonen, “Magnitude and risk factors of abortion among regular female students in Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia,” BMC Women's Health, vol. 14, no. 1, 2014.

K. Lentiro, T. Gebru, A. Worku, A. Asfaw, T. Gebremariam, and A. Tesfaye, “Risk factors of induced abortion among preparatory school student in Guraghe zone, southern region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Women's Health, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 115, 2019.

Y. Jiang, J. Han, C. Donovan et al., “Induced abortion among Chinese women with living child-a national study,” Advances in Disease Control and Prevention, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2017.

M. C. Bongfen and E. E. Bessem Abanem, “Abortion practices among women in Buéa: a socio-legal investigation,” Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 32, 2019.

W. Animaw and B. Bogale, “Abortion in university and college female students of Arba Minch town, Ethiopia, 2011,” Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–22, 2014.

C. A. C. Onebunne and F. A. Bello, “Unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion among female undergraduates in University of Ibadan, Nigeria,” Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 238–242, 2019.

E. Senbeto, G. D. Alene, N. Abesno, and H. Yeneneh, “Prevalence and associated risk factoprs of induced abortion in Northwet Ethiopia,” Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 37–44, 2005.

M. Boah, S. Bordotsiah, and S. Kuurdong, “Predictors of unsafe induced abortion among women in Ghana,” Journal of Pregnancy, vol. 2019, Article ID 9253650, 8 pages, 2019.

N. Morris and N. Prata, “Abortion history and its association with current use of modern contraceptive methods in Luanda, Angola,” Open Access Journal of Contraception, vol. 9, pp. 45–55, 2018.

P.-M. Tebeu, G. Halle-Ekane, M. Da Itambi, R. E. Mbu, Y. Mawamba, and J. N. Fomulu, “Maternal mortality in Cameroon: a university teaching hospital report,” Pan African Medical Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, 2015.

B. Alemayehu, A. Addissie, W. Ayele, S. Tiroro, and D. Woldeyohannes, “Magnitude and associated factors of repeat induced abortion among reproductive age group women who seeks abortion Care Services at Marie Stopes International Ethiopia Clinics in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,” Ethiopia. Reproductive Health, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019.

Z. Sathar, S. Singh, G. Rashida, Z. Shah, and R. Niazi, “Induced abortions and unintended pregnancies in Pakistan,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 471–491, 2014.

A. Ranji, “Induced abortion in Iran: prevalence, reasons, and consequences,” Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 482–488, 2012.

F. Tilahun, A. F. Dadi, and G. Shiferaw, “Determinants of abortion among clients coming for abortion service at Felegehiwot referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a case control study,” Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, 2017.