Journal of Powder TechnologyVolume 2013 (2013), Article ID 695895, 5 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/695895

Research Article

Effect of Crack Healing of SiC according to Times of SiO₂ Colloid Coating

Ki Woo Nam

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pukyong National University, 365, Sinseonro, Nam-ku, Busan 608-739, Republic of Korea

Received 17 March 2013; Accepted 20 May 2013

Academic Editor: Kotoji Ando

Copyright © 2013 Ki Woo Nam. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Crack healing behavior of SiC ceramics with large crack width has been studied as a function of coating and heat treatment. The SiO₂ colloid coating was carried out on two types: hydrostatic pressure coating and roll coating. The crack healing was one hour at 1173 K in air. The crack part formed SiO₂ oxides until the critical times by a hydrostatic pressure method. The crack does not anymore heal if it exceeds the critical times. The crack part and the base part have many O components and Si components regardless of the times of coating and heat treatment. The combined hydrostatic and rolling coating method did not have nearly an effect on crack-healing for large crack width over 1.4 m. The study for more effective healing of a large crack width must be carried out in the future.

1. Introduction

Due to a combination of unique properties, silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics find extensive application in several fields of engineering as materials for advanced energy systems, such as high-performance combustion systems, fuel-flexible gasification systems, fuel cell/turbine hybrid systems, nuclear fusion reactors, and high temperature gas-cooled fission reactors [1–4]. The SiC/SiC composite material is especially under study as the first wall material of the blanket because of its excellent heat resistance and low activation property [5–9]. Many studies are being conducted in order to solve the brittle nature of ceramics [10–14]. (a) Non-destructive inspection with very high ability, (b) Increase fracture toughness by fiber-reinforcement and decrease the sensitivity to crack, (c) Introduce self-crack-healing ability. It has also been reported that the cracks formed by machining were healed completely [15, 16]. In particular, some results suggest that the cracks in silicon carbide, once healed, surprisingly become even stronger than the original silicon carbide. They conclude from the crack length that it was an important factor of crack healing by oxidation in silicon carbide [17]. Furthermore, there has been no clear explanation about the effect of SiO₂ colloid coating for crack.

In this paper, the SiC ceramic with sintering additive and was prepared. We observed the effect of coating method and coating times in relation to crack healing in SiC ceramic and examined the effect of the crack width for crack healing.

2. Materials and Test Methods

Commercially available SiC (Ultrafine grade, Ibiden Co., Japan), (AKP-700, Sumitomo Chemical Co. Ltd., Japan), and (CI Chemical Co., Japan) were used as the starting materials. The mean particle sizes of the SiC, , and powders were 0.27 m, 0.1 m, and 33 m, respectively.

The SiC ceramic was prepared using a mixture of 90 wt.% SiC powder and sintering additives (). Individual batch was milled in isopropanol for 24 hours using SiC ball (5). The mixture was placed in a 363 K furnace to extract solvent and to make a dry powder mixture. The dry powder was then passed through a 106 m sieve. The mixtures were subsequently hot-pressed in gas for one hour via hot pressing conducted under 35 MPa at 2053 K.

For crack healing test, the crack was made in the center of the polished face of the specimen by a Vickers indentation at a load of 24.5 N to 196 N in air. This loading introduced a semicircular crack(2c) of 100 m to 1000 m in diameter. The crack healing by nanocolloid coating has a large effect on fracture strength. The colloid coating was carried out at two types of method, hydrostatic pressure coating and roll coating like Figure 1. Hydrostatic pressure coating (a) put the specimen in a solution of a sealed container and was maintained for 10 min at a pressure of 58.8 MPa. The roll coating (b) coated the solution on the surface through a rolling process using a coater bar. The crack healing was one hour at 1173 K in air. Cooling was spontaneous in the furnace. In order to analyze the effect of coating and heat treatment, coating and heat treatment was carried out up to three times. To investigate the crack-healed surface and the component analysis of crack healing substances, SEM (scanning electron microscope), SPM (scanning probe microscope), and EDX (energy dispersive X-ray) analyses were used, respectively.

Figure 1: Two types of method for coating. (a) Hydrostatic pressure coating, (b) roll coating.

3. Test Results and Discussion

3.1. The Effect of Hydrostatic Pressure Coating

All surface crack of SiC ceramic could heal in case of that is smaller than the crack width of 1.4 m and the crack length of 450 m [17]. In order to investigate the healing effect for larger crack width, this study applied hydrostatic pressure method as a way to penetrate the nanocolloid. The cracks are healed by being filled with amorphous silica that is produced by the oxidation of silicon carbide [15, 18].

Figure 2 shows the relationship between crack and Vickers load. Figure 2(a) shows the relations of crack width and Vickers load. Figure 2(b) shows relations of crack length and crack width. The crack width gradually became wider according to the increase of crack length; that is, the Vickers indentation load increased. As the Vickers indentation load increased, crack length and crack width also increased linearly.

(a)

(b)

Figure 2: The relationship between indentation load, crack length, and crack width. (a) Crack width by Vickers load, (b) relation of length and width.

Figure 3 is surface crack before and after heat treatment. This infiltrated the nanocolloid at crack by hydrostatic pressure method. Figure 3(a) shows the crack width of about 2 m. Figure 3(b) shows the crack shape of crack healing with the hydrostatic pressure coating of one time. Figure 3(b) was difficult to expect the crack healing with coating of one time. Though the crack part was made of cross link, the crack did not heal completely. Therefore, in order to infiltrate in the crack part with SiO₂ nanocolloid, the coating and heat treatment was repeated. Figure 3(c) was carried out the coating of two times by the hydrostatic pressure method. The crack healing was not perfect, but Figure 3(c) became more healing than Figure 3(b). Figure 3(d) with the same process of three times did not increase more the amount of oxides. The surface condition is fairly rough. Therefore, if the coating is repeated until the critical times by hydrostatic pressure, oxide can be formed densely. However, if it exceeds the critical times, it was judged that crack does not anymore heal.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3: The surface image according to the times of coating and heat treatment on about 2 m of crack width by the hydrostatic pressure method with nanocolloid. (a) Before crack healing, (b) one time crack healing, (c) two times crack healing, and (d) three times crack healing.

3.2. The Effect of Combined Hydrostatic Pressure Coating and Roll Coating

Figure 4 was coating by the combination of hydrostatic pressure method and rolling method, the crack width is about 1.8 m. In Figure 4(a), though the reduction of the crack width by oxides was significantly not observed, the crack inside formed the cross link and the width was reduced. Figure 4(b) still has a crack, but crack have been more healing than that of one time. But Figures 4(b) and 4(c) did not show much difference.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 4: The surface image according to the times of coating and heat treatment on about 1.8 m of crack width by combined hydrostatic pressure method and rolling coating method with nanocolloid. (a) One time crack healing, (b) two times crack healing, and (c) three times crack healing.

Table 1 shows the surface elemental analysis of crack healing part of Figure 3. In Figure 4, ① and ② indicate the crack part and the base part, respectively. The crack part and the base part have many O components and Si components regardless of the times of coating and heat treatment, respectively. And the amount of O increased and the amount of Si decreased according to the increase of the number of times. This is the cause that the crack and base parts have defective by formation of the oxides due to excessive heat treatment. Therefore, if the crack width is the wider, the crack healing also has hardly an effect by repeated coating and heat treatment in a variety of ways.

Table 1: Surface elemental analysis of crack healing part of Figure 3.

Condition
Element

O (wt.%)
Al (wt.%)
Si (wt.%)
Y (wt.%)

(a) One time
①
24.91
2.32
72.54
0.24

②
13.67
3.31
82.79
0.23

(b) Two times
①
57.02
0.33
41.53
1.11

②
34.92
2.72
59.66
2.69

(c) Three times
①
56.54
0.40
42.02
1.04

②
34.60
2.24
60.25
2.91

The formation of the SiO₂ oxides at crack part was observed by SPM. Figure 5 shows 1.0, 1.08, and 4.05 m of crack widths, respectively. Figure 5(a) has been completely crack healed for one time. However, Figures 5(b) and 5(c) can see that oxides were also locally formed at crack part for three times. It can be seen that this has not been made completely crack healed compared to Figure 5(a). Therefore, it was determined that the hydrostatic and rolling coating does not have a large effect on crack healing for SiC ceramics with large crack width. For the more effective healing of a large crack width, the study on width and depth of crack and coating method of nanocolloid solution must be carried out in the future.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 5: The SPM image of crack part after coating and heat treatment of 3 times. (a) Crack width of about 1 m with crack healing of one time, (b) crack width of about 1.8 m with crack healing of three times, and (c) crack width of about 4.05 m with crack healing of three times.

4. Conclusions

The crack healing behaviors of SiC ceramic were investigated the effect according to the coating method, the times of coating, and heat treatment for the crack width. If the coating is repeated until the critical times by hydrostatic pressure method, crack part formed oxides. However, if it exceeds the critical times, the crack does not anymore heal. The crack part and the base part have many O components and Si components regardless of the times of coating and heat treatment, respectively. And the amount of O increased and the amount of Si decreased according to increase of the times. The combined hydrostatic and rolling coating method does not have a large effect on crack healing for SiC ceramics with large crack width over 1.4 m. The study for the more effective healing of a large crack width must be carried out in the future.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a Research Grant from Pukyong National University (2013 year: C-D-2013-0508).

References

A. Fujishima, K. Hashimoto, and T. Watanabe, TiO₂ Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Applications, BKC, Tokyo, Japan, 1999.

A. Fujishima and K. Honda, “Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode,” Nature, vol. 238, no. 5358, pp. 37–38, 1972.

R. Kurihara, S. Ueda, S. Nishio, and Y. Seki, “Fracture mechanics evaluation of a crack generated in SiC/SiC composite first wall,” Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 54, no. 3-4, pp. 465–471, 2001.

A. Hasegawa, M. Saito, S. Nogami, K. Abe, R. H. Jones, and H. Takahashi, “Helium-bubble formation behavior of SiCf/SiC composites after helium implantation,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 264, no. 3, pp. 355–358, 1999.

N. N. Ault, “Silicon carbide ceramics, structure and properties,” in Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology, pp. 8502–8508, 2nd edition, 2001.

R. Morrell, “Matrix materials,” Comprehensive Composite Materials, vol. 4, pp. 1–24, 2000.

B. Harris, “Long-fiber-reinforced dense glass and ceramic matrix composites,” Comprehensive Composite Materials, vol. 4, pp. 489–531, 2000.

E. Kohn, “Harsh environment materials,” Comprehensive Microsystems, pp. 131–181, 2008.

T. Hansson and R. Warren, “Particle and whisker reinforced brittle matrix composites,” Comprehensive Composite Materials, pp. 579–609, 2000.

K. Ando, K. Houjyou, M. C. Chu et al., “Crack-healing behavior of Si₃N₄/SiC ceramics under stress and fatigue strength at the temperature of healing (1000°C),” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1339–1346, 2002.

K. Ando, K. Takahashi, S. Nakayama, and S. Saito, “Crack-healing behavior of Si3N4/SiC ceramics under cyclic stress and resultant fatigue strength at the healing temperature,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 85, no. 9, pp. 2268–2272, 2002.

H. S. Kim, M. K. Kim, S. B. Kang, S. H. Ahn, and K. W. Nam, “Bending strength and crack-healing behavior of Al₂O₃/SiC composites ceramics,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 483–484, no. 1-2, pp. 672–675, 2008.

K. Ando, M. C. Chu, S. Matsushita, and S. Sato, “Effect of crack- healing and proof- testing procedures on fatigue strength and reliability of Si₃N₄/SiC composites,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 977–984, 2003.

K. Ando, K. Furusawa, M. C. Chu, T. Hanagata, K. Tuji, and S. Sato, “Crack-healing behavior under stress of mullite/silicon carbide ceramics and the resultant fatigue strength,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 84, no. 9, pp. 2073–2078, 2001.

S.-K. Lee, W. Ishida, S.-Y. Lee, K.-W. Nam, and K. Ando, “Crack-healing behavior and resultant strength properties of silicon carbide ceramic,” Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 569–576, 2005.

K. W. Nam, M. K. Kim, S. W. Park, S. H. Ahn, and J. S. Kim, “Crack-healing behavior and bending strength of Si₃N₄/SiC composite ceramics by SiO₂ colloidal,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 471, no. 1-2, pp. 102–105, 2007.

K. W. Nam and J. S. Kim, “Critical crack size of healing possibility of SiC ceramics,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 527, no. 13-14, pp. 3236–3239, 2010.

M.-C. Chu, S.-J. Cho, Y.-C. Lee, H.-M. Park, and D. Y. Yoon, “Crack healing in silicon carbide,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 490–492, 2004.