Journal of Toxicology

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 546915, 20 pages

doi:10.1155/2012/546915

Review Article

The Redox System in C. elegans, a Phylogenetic Approach

Andrew D. Johnston and Paul R. Ebert

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

Received 31 March 2012; Revised 28 May 2012; Accepted 31 May 2012

Academic Editor: Cinta Porte

Copyright © 2012 Andrew D. Johnston and Paul R. Ebert. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract.

Oxidative stress is a toxic state caused by an imbalance between the production and elimination of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS cause oxidative damage to cellular components such as proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids. While the role of ROS in cellular damage is frequently all that is noted, ROS are also important in redox signalling. The “Redox Hypothesis" has been proposed to emphasize a dual role of ROS. This hypothesis suggests that the primary effect of changes to the redox state is modified cellular signalling rather than simply oxidative damage. In extreme cases, alteration of redox signalling can contribute to the toxicity of ROS, as well as to ageing and age-related diseases. The nematode species Caenorhabditis elegans provides an excellent model for the study of oxidative stress and redox signalling in animals. We use protein sequences from central redox systems in Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to query Genbank for homologous proteins in C. elegans. We then use maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis to compare protein families between C. elegans and the other organisms to facilitate future research into the genetics of redox biology.

1. Introduction

Molecular oxygen is necessary for the survival of most complex multicellular organisms. The necessity of oxygen comes from its role in aerobic respiration, a process of extracting energy from food that is approximately 19 times more efficient than its anaerobic counterpart. In eukaryotes, aerobic respiration is carried out in the mitochondria (descendant of an aerobically respiring bacterium) by a series of electron transfer reactions that are coupled to the generation of a proton gradient. This proton gradient is used to generate the cellular fuel adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The residual energy of the spent electrons is consumed in the reduction of molecular oxygen (O₂) to water (H₂O). Aerobic respiration cannot occur without this last step, but the reliance on oxygen as the final electron acceptor poses a continual threat of oxidative damage to aerobically respiring organisms.

The threat posed by oxygen comes largely from its conversion to the free radical superoxide () rather than water [1]. Superoxide is a highly reactive short-lived ROS. Detoxification of superoxide and other ROS is performed by antioxidants, which convert ROS to less reactive molecules. The antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD) converts superoxide to water and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), which is another ROS and a potent oxidising agent (see Figure 1) [2]. Under normal conditions, antioxidants help to prevent oxidative damage by using electrons to reduce ROS, thus inhibiting ROS from oxidising other molecules. However, an imbalance between ROS production and detoxification can result in oxidative stress. Numerous studies have found that high ROS levels are damaging to DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids [3–6]. Additionally, oxidative (ROS) damage is thought to be one of the major causes of ageing, according to the free-radical theory of ageing [7]. However, the free-radical theory seems to conflict with recent findings regarding the role of ROS in redox signalling, findings that have unveiled an additional mechanism for oxidative toxicity besides simply macromolecular damage.

Figure 1: Simplified pathways of ROS production and antioxidant detoxification in a C. elegans cell. ROS molecules superoxide (), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and hydroxyl radical (•OH) are depicted in red. Antioxidants convert ROS to less reactive molecules. The five different superoxide dismutase enzymes convert superoxide to H₂O₂ and are depicted in their respective cellular compartments. Catalase, peroxiredoxin (Prx), and glutathione peroxidase (Gpx) convert H₂O₂ to H₂O and O₂. Rapid detoxification of H₂O₂ is necessary as it can become oxidised to form the potent free-radical •OH. ROS can be damaging to DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids, and high ROS levels can cause oxidative stress. Some antioxidant genes, such as catalase and sod-3, can be upregulated in response to oxidative stress.

ROS are now known to do more than indiscriminately damage macromolecules; they function as important signalling molecules (reviewed by D’Autréaux and Toledano [8]). For instance, superoxide and H₂O₂ are part of a second messenger system involved in controlling subcellular redox states; modulating protein activation and turnover; regulating gene expression; and mediating extracellular signalling [9]. For this crucial messaging system to function, the levels of superoxide/H₂O₂ must be maintained at concentrations far below the level of toxicity. Therefore, ROS are unlikely to cause macromolecular damage under normal in vivo conditions. Consistent with this idea, recent studies have found that mitochondria produce superoxide/H₂O₂ at levels much lower than those previously estimated [10–12].

Jones [13] recently proposed the “redox hypothesis” as an alternative to the free-radical theory of ageing that accommodates recent discoveries in redox signalling. This hypothesis states that changes to redox state, rather than oxidative damage, cause aging and age-related diseases. The redox state of a cell, cellular compartment, or molecular system is a measure of the availability of chemically reactive electrons. In the reducing state, such electrons are more abundant whereas in the oxidising state they are less abundant. With regards to oxidative stress, the redox hypothesis suggests that an increase in ROS levels can be deleterious if the resulting oxidative shift in redox state causes a disruption to redox signalling.

To date much of what has been discovered in redox biology has resulted from work in E. coli, S. cerevisiae, mammals, and plants. While unicellular organisms such as E. coli and S. cerevisiae offer obvious advantages as model organisms due to their relative simplicity, short generation times, ease of culturing and maintenance, and so forth, they cannot be used to study systems/mechanisms unique to multicellularity in general, and animals in particular. Although not to the same extent, C. elegans offers similar advantages to working with the simple unicellular systems above, with the addition of being a multicellular, metazoan system allowing for much more of what is discovered in this organism to be extrapolated to research in other animals, including humans. This article seeks to scope out the redox proteins/systems of C. elegans as a resource for future work on redox signalling and oxidative stress within this model organism. In addition, this article will briefly explain the function of each protein family and how it relates to redox signalling and oxidative stress, with specific mention of what has been discovered in C. elegans.

2. Redox State, Redox Signalling, and Oxidative Stress

2.1. Redox-Sensitive Cysteine Switches

The majority of available reactive electrons in a biological redox system are found in cysteines (as in the abundant tripeptide glutathione). Cysteine is an amino acid with a thiol (sulfur) group that is easily oxidized. When oxidised, two thiols in close proximity to one another can bond to form a disulfide. Formation of disulfides is important in protein folding and maintaining protein structure, however, a small fraction of thiols have another function: redox-sensitive switches (see Figure 2) [14–18]. These redox-sensitive thiol switches are generally found at the surface or in the active sites of proteins. Change from a thiol state to a disulfide can alter a protein’s shape and function. The propensity for a redox-sensitive switch to be in one state or the other (thiol or disulfide) is dependent on the redox state of the cellular compartment and/or redox system to which it belongs. Therefore, the activity and conformation of a large number of proteins can be altered by changes in redox state [13].

Figure 2: Cartoon of protein with redox-sensitive thiol switch. Structural disulfides can be seen on the inside of this protein, protected from redox reactions (those attached to the green and blue segments). A redox-sensitive thiol/disulfide switch is depicted on the protein surface (attached to the red segment). When reduced the redox-sensitive switch is in its dithiol state, however, when these thiols become oxidised (i.e., electrons are removed by an oxidant such as ROS) they bond to form a disulfide, altering the structure and/or function of the protein.

2.2. The Redox State as a Signal

Redox signalling relies on oxidants and reductants that react preferentially with redox sensitive cysteines. Methionine also contains a redox active sulfur and is used in redox signalling [19], but this occurs to a lesser extent and is not discussed in this article. The most important oxidants that participate in signalling-related modification of cysteine residues are hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), a reactive oxygen species, and nitric oxide (NO), a reactive nitrogen species [20]. The focus of this article will be H₂O₂ as the signalling role of NO has been reviewed extensively [21]. Although a potent oxidant, the signalling role of H₂O₂ is primarily limited to redox-sensitive cysteine and methionine residues [22–24]. The fact that much of the cellular H₂O₂ is formed via the dismutation of superoxide () by SOD enzymes means that the amount of superoxide produced directly contributes to the levels of H₂O₂ in a cell or cellular compartment [9]. This gives superoxide an important indirect role in redox signalling. In animals, superoxide is primarily generated by NADPH oxidase (NOX) [25], Coenzyme Q₁₀ [9, 26], and Complex I and III [12] of the mitochondrial electron transport chain.

The difference in redox states between organelles results from differences in the ratio between H₂O₂ and other thiol oxidants and various disulfide reductants/antioxidants. Because the redox state can alter protein conformation and reactivity, it can be used to activate or inactivate protein function. For example, the redox state of two different cellular compartments regulates DNA binding of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf-2) transcription factor [27]. Nrf-2 is activated in the cytoplasm by an oxidative signal that results in translocation to the nucleus. However, in order to bind to DNA in the nucleus, a redox-sensitive cysteine must be reduced. This demonstrates specificity in redox signalling between different cellular compartments, for which the redox state of the compartment must be appropriate to its role (see Figure 3) [28].

Figure 3: Redox state of between different cellular compartments. Redox state is a measure of the amount of electrons available for redox reactions. In the reducing state electrons are donated, whereas in the oxidising state electrons are removed. The mitochondria and nucleus are reducing (a and b). The endoplasmic reticulum is more oxidising (c).

2.3. Major Redox Systems: Glutathione, Thioredoxin, and Cysteine

Two central thiol/disulfide couples work in the reduction of protein disulfides as counterparts to H₂O₂ and other oxidising agents to control redox state: the glutathione/glutathione disulfide (GSH/GSSG) couple (mediated through glutaredoxins) and the active site dithiol/disulfide of thioredoxins (Trxred/Trxox; see Figure 4) [29]. Glutathione and thioredoxins each interact with a different subset of proteins thus forming distinct redox systems. The redox state of one of these systems may differ from the other even in the same cellular compartment [27, 30–34]. As well as glutathione and thioredoxin working as reducers of protein disulfides, a third thiol/disulfide couple, cysteine/cystine, has also been proposed by Jones et al. [32] as a possible oxidiser of protein dithiols used in redox regulation and signalling. Changes to the ratios of these three redox couples have been observed in various disease states, and it is possible that a gradual loss of redox state homeostasis over time contributes to ageing and age-related diseases [13].

Figure 4: Glutathione-glutaredoxin and thioredoxin redox regulation systems. (a) Thioredoxin receives electrons from thioredoxin reductase and uses these to directly reduce protein disulfides. (b) Glutathione receives electrons from glutathione disulfide reductase; however, reduction of protein disulfides by glutathione is mediated through glutaredoxin. These two systems have similar functions, although there is evidence that indicates they each interact with different subsets of proteins. Arrows represent a change in redox state (loss or gain of electrons).

2.4. Redox State versus Transient Local Redox Signalling

The redox state of the various redox systems in a cell or cellular compartment must normally reside within a narrow range, not only to maintain the constitutive signals resulting from the homeostatic redox state itself, but also to allow for meaningful thresholds, where a change in redox state outside the typical range of a cellular compartment can be used to signal a change in metabolism, environment, or stress. In addition to global signals at the level of an entire organelle, generation of H₂O₂ with no measureable effect on overall redox state of the various redox systems in a cell or cellular compartment may still have a very real effect on proteins in close proximity to the site of generation, resulting in a transient local signal—an idea explored more fully by Dwivedi and Kemp [35]. An example of modulation of signalling by transient local changes rather than a global shift in redox state is altered protein phosphorylation [36] resulting, for example, from the inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases [37, 38], MAP kinase phosphatases [39], and PTEN [40]. Within the redox hypothesis paradigm, much of the toxicity of oxidative stress could result from an oxidative shift in redox state within one or more cellular compartments. This shift would likely disrupt transient redox signalling as well as perturb the regular function of redox regulated proteins within these compartments. The end result could still be pathological oxidative damage to cellular components even though the cause could be indirect.

3. Phylogenetic Analysis

3.1. Thiol/Disulfide Redox Regulators

3.1.1. Thioredoxin and Related Proteins

Thioredoxin (TRX) was first discovered in Escherichia coli as a hydrogen donor for ribonucleotide reductase [41, 42]. Since the initial characterisation, TRX proteins have been recognized as more general disulfide reductases that are found in all phylogenetic domains of life. TRX proteins have a distinct structure that encompasses the active site dithiol known as the “thioredoxin fold.” This domain is also found in a variety of related proteins including glutaredoxin, protein disulfide isomerase, peroxiredoxin, and glutathione S-transferase [43]. Each of these protein families is discussed in other sections of this article. The characteristic CGPC active site dithiol motif can be oxidised to a disulfide to release electrons that are used to reduce redox-sensitive disulfides within a wide range of target proteins [44].

TRX proteins were long thought to be primarily involved in restoration of redox-sensitive disulfides to their reduced state after being oxidised by ROS. In particular, ROS scavengers such as peroxiredoxin require the activity of TRX proteins for their regeneration. However, the role of TRX as a disulfide reductase is now known to be important for immune signalling [45], regulating transcription factors [46], and modulating cellular signalling [47].

Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis revealed that C. elegans possesses twenty proteins closely related in sequence and length to TRX proteins in yeast, humans and fruit flies. Seven of these twenty proteins contain the characteristic CGPC active site sequence required for TRX activity. Five of these CGPC containing proteins, TRX-1, TRX-2, TRX-4, Y45E10.A, and Y55F3AR.2, are closely related to proteins of known TRX activity in S. cerevisiae, H. sapiens, and D. melanogaster. Human cytosolic thioredoxin 1 (TRXN1) has roles in the activation of transcription factors activator protein-1 (AP-1) [48] and nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) [49, 50], as well as in immune signalling [45, 51]. Although orthology is unclear between human TRXN1 and C. elegans TRX proteins (Figure 5), both human TRXN1 and C. elegans TRX-1 are cytoplasmic [52]. TRX-1 is expressed in intestinal cells as well as the ASJ pair of neurons and modulates adult lifespan extension induced by dietary restriction [53]. Human mitochondrial TRXN2, for which there is likely orthology with C. elegans TRX-2, is part of a mitochondria-dependent superoxide/TRXN2/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK-1) apoptosis signalling pathway [54]. In C. elegans interactions of TRX-1 and TRX-2 with exonuclease 3 (EXO-3) and C. elegans p53-like protein (CEP-1), appear to play a role in neural structure and function as well as ageing [55]. Some of the functions of TRX are redox independent. For example, TRX-1 modulates the activity of the insulin-like neuropeptide DAF-28 in ASJ sensory neurons in the head during C. elegans dauer formation. This function was retained even after the redox activity of the protein was disrupted by replacing the two Cys residues of its active site with two Ser residues [56]. In regard to thioredoxin-like (TRXL) proteins, the close relationship found between Y45E10.A and Y55F3AR.2 and the thioredoxin-like proteins of humans (TXNL1) and D. melanogaster (TXL) suggests possible orthology. Functions of the TRXL proteins are yet to be determined.

Figure 5: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of thioredoxin (TRX) and nucleoredoxin (NXN) proteins. A blast (blastp) search of known Homo sapiens (H.s), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S.c), and Drosophila melanogaster (D.m) proteins was undertaken to identify all the homologs within these three species. The proteins from these species were then blasted against Caenorhabditis elegans (C.e) to identify homologues in the Genbank database. Identified sequences with significant expected value (≤~1E − 10 were used to generate a multiple sequence alignment (MSA) via ClustalW 2.1. The MSAs were then trimmed and used to produce a maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates via Mega 5.10. Proteins with sequences greater that ~350aa that were more closely related to other families discussed in this paper, such as GRX or PDI, were removed from this analysis. Some proteins fit equally well with TRX and TRX-related families, for example, DPY11 can be found in both the TRX and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) trees.

The other two C. elegans homologs containing the CGPC sequence, TRX-3 and TRX-5, were found as part a clade containing nucleoredoxin (NXN) and related proteins. Humans possess a single NXN, which contains a CPPC active site, and two nucleoredoxin-like proteins (NXNL1 and NXNL2). NXN (reviewed in [57]) has been shown to function as a redox regulator of gene expression [58] and a negative regulator of toll-like receptor signalling [59]. It also sustains Wnt/ß -Catenin signalling [60]. Six out of the nine C. elegans proteins within the NXN clade contain the CPPC NXN active site sequence, suggesting a possible expansion of the NXN subfamily. Proteins within this NXN clade are also closely related to the 16-Kilodalton class of thioredoxins described in the parasitic nematode Brugia malayi [61].

3.1.2. Glutathione

Reduced glutathione (GSH) is a tripeptide consisting of glycine, cysteine and glutamic acid. GSH synthesis is performed in a two-step ATP-dependent process. In the rate-limiting first step gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS; see Table 1) synthesises gamma-glutamylcysteine from L-glutamate and cysteine. In the second-step glutathione synthetase (GSS; see Table 2) adds glycine to the C-terminal of gamma-glutamylcysteine. These enzymes are highly conserved in eukaryotes (Tables 1 and 2) and even in prokaryotes (not shown).

Table 1: Similarity between C.e gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase and orthologues in H.s., S.c., and D.m.

Species name
Protein name
Function
% identity
E value

H.s.
GCLC
gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase
350/643 (54%)
0.0

D.m.
GCLC
gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase
281/498 (56%)
0.0

S.c.
GSH1
gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase
254/672 (38%)

C.e: C. elegans, H.s: H. sapiens, S.c: S. cerevisiae, D.m: D. melanogaster.

Table 2: Similarity between C.eglutathione synthetase and orthologues in H.s., S.c., and D.m.

Species name
Protein name
Function
% identity
E value

H.s.
GSS
glutathione synthetase
185/470 (39%)

D.m.
CG32495
glutathione synthetase
180/491 (37%)

S.c.
GSH2
glutathione synthetase
147/494 (30%)

C.e: C. elegans, H.s: H. sapiens, S.c: S. cerevisiae, D.m: D. melanogaster.

Glutathione plays an essential role in antioxidant defence as a source of electrons for antioxidant enzymes such as glutaredoxins and peroxidases [63]. The high (millimolar) concentrations of glutathione in the cell ensure an abundance of electrons for these antioxidant systems and thus provide a robust buffer against oxidative shifts in redox state [64]. GSH also serves as a reversible cysteine adduct. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) can form mixed disulfides between glutathione and redox-sensitive cysteine thiols of proteins. This activity can be used to regulate protein activity and under oxidizing conditions can prevent irreversible oxidation of thiols to sulfinic (SO₂H) and sulfonic acid (SO₃H) oxoforms [65, 66]. GST can also conjugate glutathione to xenobiotic compounds as part of a detoxification response [67] and to a fatty acid in the synthesis of prostaglandin hormone [68, 69].

The ratio of reduced glutathione to glutathione disulfide within a cellular compartment, that is, [GSH]²/[GSSG], determines its redox state. High [GSH]²/[GSSG] ratios such as those found in the mitochondria, cytoplasm, and nucleus ensure that the majority of redox-sensitive protein switches within these compartments are in the reduced (–SH) state [77]. Maintenance of the proper [GSH]²/[GSSG] ratio ensures redox homeostasis, whereas changes to this ratio provide a simple means to adjust the redox state between compartments as well as within compartments under different physiological conditions. For example, changes in redox state have been found to trigger responses associated with defence against particular biotic or abiotic stressors [78]. In plants, changes to the cellular glutathione pool havebeen shown to elicit pathogen resistance responses [79, 80]. These examples demonstrate that global changes to protein activity and widespread changes to signalling can be achieved quite readily by simply changing the redox set point within a cellular compartment.

3.1.3. Glutathione Disulfide Reductase and Thioredoxin Reductase

When oxidised, the reduced (thiol) states of glutathione and TRX enzymes are restored by glutathione disuflide reductase (GSR) and TRX reductase (TRXR), respectively, using electrons obtained from NADPH (Figure 4) [81]. The maximum likelihood tree of this family forms three clades (Figure 6). GSR is absent from D. melanogaster and has been substituted by a novel glutaredoxin-thioredoxin reductase fusion protein (TRXR-1) [82]. S. cerevisiae possess proteins with TRXR enzymatic activity, however, these proteins are evolutionarily unrelated to the animal forms and are thus not represented on the phylogenetic tree [83]. Interestingly, TRXR-1 is the only selenocysteine containing protein in C. elegans, and both TRXR-1 and GSR-1 are essential for proper moulting [84].

Figure 6: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of thioredoxin reductase (TRXR), glutathione disulfide reductase (GSR) and dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) proteins. C. elegans possess two TRXR: mitochondrial TRXR-1 and cytosolic TRXR-2. In addition C. elegans contain a single glutathione disulfide reductase (GSR) and the closely related DLD. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

The third clade of this protein family is composed of dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) orthologs. DLD is similar in structure to both TRXR and GSR, however, its functions are quite different. DLD is a component of various protein complexes located within the mitochondrial matrix, including pyruvate dehydrogenase, alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, and the branched chain amino acid-dehydrogenase complexes as well as the glycine cleavage system. In these complexes DLD is required for regeneration of oxidised lipoamide from the reduced dihydrolipoamide cofactor. The pyruvate dehydrogenase and branched chain amino acid-dehydrogenase complexes (2-Oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes) are thought to play a role in redox regulation via the reduction of thioredoxins [85]. In addition, the alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex has been found to be a generator of H₂O₂ [86, 87].

3.1.4. Glutaredoxin

Glutaredoxin (GLRX) uses electrons extracted from GSH to reduce redox-sensitive disulfides of a variety of proteins, thereby modulating enzyme activity [88]. GLRX can also carry out oxidative cysteine glutathionylation of proteins resulting in protein-glutathione mixed disulfides [78], and the reverse reaction, deglutathionylation (i.e., the reduction of the mixed disulfides), restoring the protein to its unmodified form. GLRX enzymes come in two forms: a monothiol form that contains a single cysteine in the active site and a dithiol form that contains two cysteines in the active site. These two forms differ in function and can be seen as distinct clades in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 7). The reduction of protein disulfides as well as the oxidative formation of protein-glutathione-mixed disulfides are both catalysed via dithiol mechanisms, whereas reductive deglutathionylation is performed by a monothiol mechanism [89].

Figure 7: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of glutaredoxin (GLRX) proteins. Dark blue signifies the conserved active site of monothiol GLRX. Light blue signifies proteins of greater similarity to known dithiol GLRX, regardless of whether or not two cysteines are actually is present in the region aligned to the active sites. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

One of the GLRX clades contains only monothiol proteins with the CGFS active site sequences, whereas the other clade contains mostly dithiols with a variety of active site sequences, as well as a few proteins with a single cysteine active site. The mammalian GLRX3 (PICOT), likely ortholog of C. elegans GLRX-3, has been characterised as an iron-sulfur binding protein possibly regulated by ROS and reactive nitrogen species [90]. GLRX3 is essential for embryonic development, postembryonic growth, and heart function [91]. Human GLRX1 has a number of roles including the regulation of redox signal transduction and protein translocation [92], caspase-3 signalling in tumor necrosis factor-α-induced cell death [93], and angiotensinII redox signalling via glutathionylation of Ras [94]. C. elegans GLRX-10 is closely related to human GLRX1, both of which are nested within a subclade of dithiol GLRX enzymes, all of which except GLRX2 contain the CPYC active site sequence. F10D7.3 is somewhat similar to Grx6p and Grx7p from S. cerevisiae, although the difference in size and active site makes orthology unlikely. GLRX-21, GLRX-22, and ZC334.7 were found to group closely with S. cerevisiae Grx8p, but again differences in size (particularly the larger size of ZC334.7) and the sequence of their dithiol active sites makes orthology unlikely. To date very little work on GLRX proteins has been performed in C. elegans. Worth mentioning, however, is a paper published in 2010 which found that GLRX-21 functions in the prevention of selenium-induced oxidative stress [95].

3.1.5. Protein Disulfide Isomerase

The protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) protein family is composed of a large and diverse group of enzymes, most of which contain at least one TRX-like domain with a CxxC active site motif. PDI enzymes reside in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where their usual function is to catalyse protein folding. The active site cysteines of PDI are used in thiol-disulfide exchange between cysteine residues of the substrate proteins. This PDI thiol-disulfide exchange enables proteins to rapidly aquire the correct configuration of structural disulfide bonds required to achieve their native structure [96]. PDI functions in four different chemical reactions: (1) the oxidation of protein disulfides, using GSSG as the electron acceptor; (2) the reduction of protein disulfides, using GSH or NADPH as the electron donor; (3) the deglutathionylation of mixed disulfides; (4) the isomerization (rearrangement) of intra-molecular disulfides. These functions of PDI proteins require the more oxidised redox state of the ER [70, 97]. In addition to passively relying on a more oxidised redox state, it has also been suggested that some PDI proteins may play a role in redox regulation [62].

In C. elegans, Karala et al. [98] analysed and compared the activities of PDI-1, PDI-2, and PDI-3 and found that all three displayed thiol-disulfide exchange activity, but that each showed a difference in reactivity towards various protein substrates. RNAi knockdown of the pdi-2 and pdi-3 genes results in an unflolded protein response, which suggests PDI-2 and PDI-3 are indeed required for proper protein folding [83]. Additionally, Winter et al. [99] studied PDI-1, PDI-2, and PDI-3 and found that PDI activity is required for embryonic development and proper formation of the extracellular matrix.

Comparision of PDI sequences and phylogentic analysis revealed a number of unnamed proteins with likely othology to known human PDIs, as well as a few small gene expansion events both in C. elegans and human. The end result is 19 proteins in both C. elegans and human, but only 8 in D. melanogaster and 4 in S. cerevisiae (see Figure 8). Human P4HB (PDI/PDIA1), PDIA3 (ERp57), and PDIA4 (ERp72)—the probable orthologs of C. elegans PDI-2 (or PDI-1), PDI-3, and C14B9.2, respectively—all react readily with peptide dithiols in vitro to form disulfides [100]. C. elegans PDI-1 is peculiar in that the N-terminal active sites of all of its closely related homologs contain the characteristic PDI sequence CGHC, whereas in C. elegans the glycine has been replaced by a valine (CVHC). The similarity of C. elegans PDI-1 to human P4HB in size and sequence would suggest an orthologs relationship between these two proteins. However, human P4HB can be found as the beta subunit of prolyl 4-hydroxylase (P4H),a complex which hydroxylatesprolinetohydroxyproline in the production ofcollagen [101]. In C. elegans, the beta subunit of the P4H complex is PDI-2 [102, 103], making PDI-2 the more likely ortholog of P4HB, despite PDI-2 being ~100 amino acids shorter than C. elegans PDI-1 and human P4HB. Regarding the other PDI homologs, Ko and Chow [104] found that the DPY-11 protein of C. elegans that is a possible ortholog of human TMX1, is necessary for body and sensory organ morphogenesis, which they argue is due to its role in substrate modification in the hypodermis. In terms of redox signalling, human P4HB has been found to work antagonistically with TRXN1 in the regulation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)-dependent gene expression: TRXN1 actives the NF-κB pathway, whereas P4HB expression suppresses NF-κB activity in a dose-dependent manner [105]. Other possible PDI orthologous relationships involving C. elegans include human TMX3, D. melanogaster CG5027, and C. elegans ZK973.11; human TXNDC12 (ERp18) and C. elegans Y57A101.23; D. melanogaster CG4670 and C. elegans F47B7.2; human PDIA6 (p5), C. elegans TAG-320 and C. elegans Y49E10.4 (see Table 3). Although, whether any of these proteins participate in redox signalling remains to be investigated.

Table 3: Characterised protein disulfide isomerase and their C. elegans orthologs.

PDI homolog
Known functions
C. elegans ortholog

(paralogs)

AGR2
Unknown
None

AGR3
Unknown
None

ERp27
Unknown
(C30H6.8, C35B1.5,

DNAjc10
ER-associated protein degradation [70]
F47B7.2, Y52E8A.3)

ERp29
Specialist ‘‘escort’’ chaperone [71]

Thyroglobulin processing [72]
None

ERp46
Some P4HB functional redundancy

Protective role against hypoxia [70]
(W01B11.6, Y55F3AR.2)

ERp44
Possible role in late-stage oligomerization reactions

Possible role in late-stage, thiol-dependent, protein quality-control system or trafficking [70]
C06A6.5, C30H7.2

P4HB
Thiol-disulfide exchange catalysis

Role in protein folding

Beta subunit of P4H complex [70]
PDI-2, PDI-1

PDIA2
Expressed in pancreas and brain [73, 74]

Thiol-disulfide exchange catalysis similar to P4HB

Specific function still unclear
None

PDIA3
Involved in MHC class I folding as part of MHC I peptide-loading complex [75]

Oxidative folding of glycoproteins
PDI-3

PDIA4
Thiol-disulfide exchange catalysis similar to P4HB

Some PDIA3 redundancy

Can form part of a complex with P4HB, PDIA6, ERdj3, BiP, CypB, HSP40, GRP94, GRP170, UDP glucosyltransferase, and SDF2-L1 [76]
C14B9.2

PDIA5
Unknown
(F35G2.1, T10H10.2)

PDIA6
Likely catalyze thiol-disulfide exchange similar to P4HB

Likely role in protein folding
TAG-320, Y49E10.4

PDILT
Unknown
None

TMX1
ER transmembrane PDI

Unknown function
DPY-11

TMX2
ER transmembrane PDI

Unknown function
None

TMX3
ER transmembrane PDI

Protein dithiol-disulfide oxidant
ZK973.11

TMX4
ER transmembrane PDI

Unknown function
None

TXNDC12
Unknown
Y57A10A.23

Italic rowsare human proteins that share the same C. elegans paralogs.

Figure 8: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) proteins. Green boxes are likely TRX-like fold in human PDI; blue are likely noncatalytic thirodoxin domains (according to Hatahet and Ruddock [62]). White boxes show CxxC catalytic motifs, in C. elegans and D. melanogaster. Although domain structure cannot be inferred from sequence alone, it is likely that proteins that share similar sequences, catalytic motifs, and length also share a similar domain structure and in some cases are likely orthologous. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

3.2. Superoxide/H₂O₂ Generation and Removal

3.2.1. NADPH Oxidase

The NADPH oxidase (NOX) system was first described as a system used by mammalian phagocytes in the production of superoxide as a response to infection by microorganisms [106]. The core enzyme of this microbial defence system is NOX2, which—under the regulation of its p22phox, p47phox, p40phox, p67phox, and RAC subunits—catalyses the formation of large amounts of superoxide, which in turn is converted to additional reactive oxygen species. The resulting high ROS levels results in the death of invading microbial pathogens. A total of seven NOX homologues exist in mammals, including NOX1 through 5 and the dual oxidases DUOX-1 and DUOX-2. Most of these homologs generate much lower of levels of ROS than NOX2 and are found in a much wider range of cell types. Lambeth [25] presents a case for the importance of NOX proteins in the generation of ROS signals, but this hypothesis has not yet been rigorously tested.

Most important to a discussion of NOX activity in C. elegans is the function of DUOX, as the only two NOX homologs in C. elegans, DUOX-2 and BLI-3, are related to the DUOX proteins of humans and D. melanogaster (Figure 9). These proteins contain an additional peroxidase domain not found in the NOX1 through 5. DUOX serves a dual role in both the generation of superoxide and catalysis of reactions in the extracellular matrix using H₂O₂. The subunits used to regulate NOX2 are not used in the regulation of DUOX enzymes. Additionally, blastp searches do not reveal homology to any of the NOX2 regulating subunits in C. elegans. It is important to note the DUOX has not been implicated in ROS signalling, and there is evidence to suggest that in mammals they instead play a role in the biosynthesis of thyroid hormones in the extracellular matrix [107]. In C. elegans, the DUOX homolog BLI-3 functions in tyrosine cross-linking in the extracellular matrix [108, 109]. Further research may yet reveal additional mechanisms for the DUOX homologs in C. elegans.

Figure 9: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of NADPH oxidase (NOX)/dual oxidase (DUOX) proteins. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

3.2.2. Superoxide Dismutase

SOD proteins are generally regarded as antioxidants responsible for eliminating the ROS superoxide. An alternative view is that these enzymes generate H₂O₂ for use in redox signalling [110]. In this regard, the levels of SOD activity could be important in regulating H₂O₂ levels. A signalling role for SOD goes well beyond the popular view that SOD is responsible for the complete removal of superoxide from cellular compartments for the sole purpose of preventing oxidative damage.

Much of the recent research on SOD enzymes has focused on their possible role in the ageing process, in experiments designed to test the free-radical theory of ageing. In some cases, decreasing levels of SOD have been shown to shorten the lifespan of yeast [111–114], fruit flies [115], and mice [116], but this is not uniformly the case. In fact, an analysis of the entire sod gene family in C. elegans revealed that both increasing and decreasing expression of the sod genes had little effect on lifespan [117]. When sod gene expression is experimentally increased, lifespan is either unaltered or decreased [117–120]. A report from Y. Honda and S. Honda [121] showed that increased expression of sod-1 and sod-2 extended the lifespan of C. elegans, but that this was not due to decreased oxidative damage. While results are inconsistent between species and are not even consistent between experiments on a single species, it is clear that the view of SOD as an eliminator of ROS that would otherwise limit lifespan is much too simplistic.

Two distinct classes of SOD enzymes exist within eukaryotes: copper/zincSOD (Cu/Zn SOD), found in the cytosol or extracellular matrix [122]; manganese SOD (Mn SOD), found in the mitochondria [123]. Phylogenetic analysis clearly shows two main clades corresponding to Mn and Cu/Zn enzymes (Figure 10). Unlike the other three species in the analysis, each of which has only a single Mn SOD, there has been a duplication of the gene in C. elegans, sod-2 and sod-3. The same is true of the human Cu/Zn sod-1, in that human and the other two species have a single gene that corresponds to a pair of genes in C. elegans, sod-1 and sod-5. The last sod gene in C. elegans, sod-4, corresponds to a single gene in each of human and D. melanogaster. It is an extracellular Cu/Zn SOD [124], with a possible function is daf-2 signalling [117].

Figure 10: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of superoxide dismutase (SOD) proteins. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

3.2.3. Glutathione Peroxidase

The glutathione peroxidases (GPX) were first characterised as a family of proteins that reduce H₂O₂ to H₂O using GSH as the electron donor [125]. Humans and C. elegans both contain a large number of GPX proteins (8 and 7, resp.) compared to yeast (3 proteins) and D. melanogaster (only 2 proteins). Most of these appear to have arisen independently by gene duplications within the two taxonomic lineages (Figure 11). While five of the eight humans GPX contain a selenocysteine in their active site, not a single selenocysteine is found in any of the C. elegans GPX homologs.

Figure 11: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of GPX proteins. See Figure 6 for details on the phylogenetic analysis.

Despite the relatedness of C. elegans proteins with proteins of known GPX activity, Vanfleteren [126] was unable to detect any GPX activity in C. elegans tissue. However, the in vitro assay used in this article only included GSH as a reducing substrate. Use of GSH appears to be limited to GPX enzymes that contain selenocysteine; the cysteine-containing GPX homologs of C. elegans likely use a peroxiredoxin-like mechanism with thioredoxin as their reducing substrate [127].

Numerous studies have implicated GPX proteins in redox signalling. For example, Faltin et al. [128] found that ROS signalling used in the early stage shoot organogenesis of plants is regulated by the GPX homolog PHGPx. In mammals, ROS regulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) signalling is modulated by GPX1 [129], while GPX1 deficiency is found to enhance proinflammatory cytokine-induced redox signalling [130]. Conversely, high levels of catalase and GPX activity have been found to diminish H₂O₂ signalling in human alveolar macrophages [131]. The C. elegans protein F26E4.12, a homolog of human GPX4 and plant PHGPx, regulates the peptide transporter PEPT-1 [132].

3.2.4. Peroxiredoxin

Peroxiredoxins (PRDX) are found as homodimers in which the active site cysteines align in close proximity and form intermolecular dithiols/disulfides. PRDX disulfides function in the reduction of H₂O₂ to H₂O for both antioxidant defence and mediation of ROS signalling [133, 134]. Active site disulfides formed in the reduction of H₂O₂ are reduced back to dithiols by the thioredoxin redox system. PRDX comes in three forms: “Typical” 2-Cys, “Atypical” 2-Cys, and 1-Cys.

Phylogenetic analysis showed that C. elegans have two typical 2-Cys PRDX, 1-Cys PRDX, but does not possess an atypical 2-Cys PRDX homolog (Figure 12). Human PRDX1 and PRDX2, two of the typical 2-Cys PRDX homologs to C. elegans PRDX-2, might participate in both intra- and extracellular signalling cascades by regulating levels of H₂O₂ [23]. The human mitochondrial typical 2-Cys PRDX3, which is closely related to C. elegans PRDX-3, participates in the regulation of apoptotic signalling. Little research has been done on the PRDX proteins of C. elegans. What is known is that PRDX-2 is necessary for normal growth and egg production in C. elegans, which Isermann et al. [135] argue is likely due to its role in peroxide signalling. Interestingly, loss of PRDX-2 actually increases resistance to some oxidative stress causing agents but results in a decrease in lifespan [136].

Figure 12: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of peroxiredoxin (PRDX) proteins.“Typical” 2-Cys PRDX is shown in green and purple; “Atypical” 2-Cys in blue and yellow; and 1-Cys in green. Active site cysteine regions highlighted in the same colour are those that aligned in the MSA. See Figure 5 for details of how the sequences were identified and processed as well as how the phylogenetic analysis was carried out.

3.2.5. Catalase

Catalase functions in the decomposition of H₂O₂ to H₂O and O₂. Phylogenetic analysis shows a lineage specific expansion from one catalase to three in C. elegans (Figure 13). C. elegans CTL-1 is required for the extended adult lifespans of daf-2, age-1, and clk-1 mutants [137]. CTL-2 is found in the peroxisomes of C. elegans [138] and a lack of this protein has been found to cause a progeric phenotype and adversely affect development/egg laying [139]. The ctl-1 and ctl-2 genes are both negatively regulated by DAF-2-mediated insulin signalling [140]. As such, DAF-2 signalling might result in an increase in the levels of H₂O₂, and thus a more oxidizing state.

Figure 13: Maximum likelihood majority-rule bootstrap consensus tree of catalase proteins. See Figure 6 for details on the phylogenetic analysis.

4. Conclusion

Reactive oxygen species are thought to play a role in many diseases of ageing, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, heart failure, and myocardial infarction. This makes understanding their dual roles as oxidative stressors and signalling molecules highly significant. Important to this understanding is a clear description of the protein families that contribute to the generation and metabolism of ROS. Most of the known protein families that participate in redox biology are discussed in this article, but it is likely that additional, undescribed families of redox proteins remain to be discovered. It is striking that of the protein families that have been compared in this study, most show clear relationships between sequences, with no extreme examples of species-specific family expansion. S. cerevisiae frequently, and D. melanogaster sometimes, had smaller gene families than the other two species.

In addition to oxidative damage, higher ROS levels disrupt the regular function of redox regulators and their downstream effectors. It is, therefore, likely that at least some, if not many, of the toxic effects associated with oxidative stress are the result of disruption to redox signalling. Continued research into the various functions of the C. elegans redox proteins discussed in this article will help to achieve a better understanding of redox signalling, oxidative stress, and the relationship between these two biological phenomena. C. elegans and H. sapiens exhibited fairly conserved gene family structure, indicating that C. elegans will provide a medically relevant model of redox signalling.

References

S. Miwa, J. St-Pierre, L. Partridge, and M. D. Brand, “Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production by Drosophila mitochondria,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 938–948, 2003.

J. M. McCord and I. Fridovich, “Superoxide dismutase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 244, no. 22, pp. 6049–6055, 1969.

J. F. Mead, “Free radical mechanisms of lipid damage and consequences for cellular membranes,” Free Radicals in Biology, vol. 1, pp. 51–68, 1976.

N. Brot, L. Weissbach, J. Werth, and H. Weissbach, “Enzymatic reduction of protein-bound methionine sulfoxide,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 2155–2158, 1981.

B. Demple and S. Linn, “5,6-saturated thymine lesions in DNA: production by ultraviolet light or hydrogen peroxide,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 3781–3789, 1982.

R. Cathcart, E. Schwiers, R. L. Saul, and B. N. Ames, “Thymine glycol and thymidine glycol in human and rat urine: a possible assay for oxidative DNA damage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 81, no. 18 I, pp. 5633–5637, 1984.

D. Harman, “Aging: a theory based on free radical and radiation chemistry,” Journal of gerontology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 298–300, 1956.

B. D'Autréaux and M. B. Toledano, “ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 813–824, 2007.

A. W. Linnane, M. Kios, and L. Vitetta, “Coenzyme Q10-Its role as a prooxidant in the formation of superoxide anion/hydrogen peroxide and the regulation of the metabolome,” Mitochondrion, vol. 7, pp. S51–S61, 2007.

H. Nohl, A. V. Kozlov, K. Staniek, and L. Gille, “The multiple functions of coenzyme Q,” Bioorganic Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2001.

H. Nohl, L. Gille, and K. Staniek, “Intracellular generation of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 719–723, 2005.

J. St-Pierre, J. A. Buckingham, S. J. Roebuck, and M. D. Brand, “Topology of superoxide production from different sites in the mitochondrial electron transport chain,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 47, pp. 44784–44790, 2002.

D. P. Jones, “Radical-free biology of oxidative stress,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 295, no. 4, pp. C849–C868, 2008.

P. Klatt and S. Lamas, “Regulation of protein function by S-glutathiolation in response to oxidative and nitrosative stress,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 16, pp. 4928–4944, 2000.

M. Fratelli, H. Demol, M. Puype et al., “Identification by redox proteomics of glutathionylated proteins in oxidatively stressed human T lymphocytes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 3505–3510, 2002.

T. Hisabori, S. Hara, T. Fujii, D. Yamazaki, N. Hosoya-Matsuda, and K. Motohashi, “Thioredoxin affinity chromatography: a useful method for further understanding the thioredoxin network,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 56, no. 416, pp. 1463–1468, 2005.

A. Martínez-Ruiz and S. Lamas, “Proteomic identification of 5-nitrosylated proteins in endothelial cells,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 357, pp. 215–223, 2007.

A. Martínez-Ruiz and S. Lamas, “Signalling by NO-induced protein S-nitrosylation and S-glutathionylation: convergences and divergences,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 220–228, 2007.

E. R. Stadtman, J. Moskovitz, and R. L. Levine, “Oxidation of methionine residues of proteins: biological consequences,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 577–582, 2003.

H. J. Forman, J. M. Fukuto, and M. Torres, “Redox signaling: thiol chemistry defines which reactive oxygen and nitrogen species can act as second messengers,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 287, no. 2, pp. C246–C256, 2004.

D. T. Hess, A. Matsumoto, S. O. Kim, H. E. Marshall, and J. S. Stamler, “Protein S-nitrosylation: purview and parameters,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 150–166, 2005.

Y. Shechter, Y. Burstein, and A. Patchornik, “Selective oxidation of methionine residues in proteins,” Biochemistry, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 4497–4503, 1975.

E. A. Veal, A. M. Day, and B. A. Morgan, “Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007.

H. Miki and Y. Funato, “Regulation of intracellular signalling through cysteine oxidation by reactive oxygen species,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 151, pp. 255–261, 2012.

J. D. Lambeth, “NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 181–189, 2004.

A. W. Linnane, M. Kios, and L. Vitetta, “Healthy aging: regulation of the metabolome by cellular redox modulation and prooxidant signaling systems: the essential roles of superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide,” Biogerontology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 445–467, 2007.

J. M. Hansen, W. H. Watson, and D. P. Jones, “Compartmentation of Nrf-2 redox control: regulation of cytoplasmic activation by glutathione and DNA binding by thioredoxin-1,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 308–317, 2004.

Y. M. Go and D. P. Jones, “Redox compartmentalization in eukaryotic cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1780, no. 11, pp. 1273–1290, 2008.

D. P. Jones and Y. M. Go, “Redox compartmentalization and cellular stress,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2010.

E. R. Taylor, F. Hurrell, R. J. Shannon, T. K. Lin, J. Hirst, and M. P. Murphy, “Reversible glutathionylation of complex I increases mitochondrial superoxide formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 22, pp. 19603–19610, 2003.

E. W. Trotter and C. M. Grant, “Non-reciprocal regulation of the redox state of the glutathione-glutaredoxin and thioredoxin systems,” EMBO Reports, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 184–188, 2003.

D. P. Jones, Y. M. Go, C. L. Anderson, T. R. Ziegler, J. M. Kinkade, and W. G. Kirlin, “Cysteine/cystine couple is a newly recognized node in the circuitry for biologic redox signaling and control,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1246–1248, 2004.

J. M. Hansen, H. Zhang, and D. P. Jones, “Differential oxidation of thioredoxin-1, thioredoxin-2, and glutathione by metal ions,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 2006.

M. Kemp, Y. M. Go, and D. P. Jones, “Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of thiol/disulfide redox systems: a perspective on redox systems biology,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 921–937, 2008.

G. Dwivedi and M. L. Kemp, “Systemic redox regulation of cellular information processing,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 374–380, 2012.

S. G. Rhee, Y. S. Bae, S. R. Lee, and J. Kwon, “Hydrogen peroxide: a key messenger that modulates protein phosphorylation through cysteine oxidation,” Science's STKE, vol. 2000, no. 53, p. PE1, 2000.

T. C. Meng, T. Fukada, and N. K. Tonks, “Reversible oxidation and inactivation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in vivo,” Molecular Cell, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 387–399, 2002.

K. Mahadev, A. Zilbering, L. Zhu, and B. J. Goldstein, “Insulin-stimulated hydrogen peroxide reversibly inhibits protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B in v ivo and enhances the early insulin action cascade,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 24, pp. 21938–21942, 2001.

H. Kamata, S. I. Honda, S. Maeda, L. Chang, H. Hirata, and M. Karin, “Reactive oxygen species promote TNFα-induced death and sustained JNK activation by inhibiting MAP kinase phosphatases,” Cell, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 649–661, 2005.

N. R. Leslie, D. Bennett, Y. E. Lindsay, H. Stewart, A. Gray, and C. P. Downes, “Redox regulation of PI 3-kinase signalling via inactivation of PTEN,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 22, no. 20, pp. 5501–5510, 2003.

T. C. Laurent, E. C. Moore, and P. Reichard, “Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 239, pp. 3436–3444, 1964.

E. C. Moore, P. Reichard, and L. Thelander, “Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides V. Purification and properties of thioredoxin reductase from Escherichia coli B,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 239, pp. 3445–3452, 1964.

J. L. Pan and J. C. A. Bardwell, “The origami of thioredoxin-like folds,” Protein Science, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2217–2227, 2006.

C. H. Lillig and A. Holmgren, “Thioredoxin and related molecules—from biology to health and disease,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 25–47, 2007.

H. Nakamura, K. Nakamura, and J. Yodoi, “Redox regulation of cellular activation,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 15, pp. 351–369, 1997.

K. Pekkari and A. Holmgren, “Truncated thioredoxin: physiological functions and mechanism,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2004.

G. Powis and W. R. Montfort, “Properties and biological activities of thioredoxins,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 41, pp. 261–295, 2001.

C. Abate, L. Patel, F. J. Rauscher, and T. Curran, “Redox regulation of Fos and Jun DNA-binding activity in vitro,” Science, vol. 249, no. 4973, pp. 1157–1161, 1990.

T. Okamoto, H. Ogiwara, T. Hayashi, A. Mitsui, T. Kawabe, and J. Yodoi, “Human thioredoxin/adult T cell leukemia-derived factor activates the enhancer binding protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by thiol redox control mechanism,” International Immunology, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 811–819, 1992.

T. Hayashi, Y. Ueno, and T. Okamoto, “Oxidoreductive regulation of nuclear factor κ B. Involvement of a cellular reducing catalyst thioredoxin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 15, pp. 11380–11388, 1993.

S. H. Kim, J. Oh, J. Y. Choi, J. Y. Jang, M. W. Kang, and C. E. Lee, “Identification of human thioredoxin as a novel IFN-gamma-induced factor: mechanism of induction and its role in cytokine production,” BMC Immunology, vol. 9, article no. 64, 2008.

A. Miranda-Vizuete, J. C. F. González, G. Gahmon, J. Burghoorn, P. Navas, and P. Swoboda, “Lifespan decrease in a Caenorhabditis elegans mutant lacking TRX-1, a thioredoxin expressed in ASJ sensory neurons,” FEBS Letters, vol. 580, no. 2, pp. 484–490, 2006.

J. C. Fierro-González, M. González-Barrios, A. Miranda-Vizuete, and P. Swoboda, “The thioredoxin TRX-1 regulates adult lifespan extension induced by dietary restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 406, no. 3, pp. 478–482, 2011.

P. I. K. Lim, J. Liu, M. I. Go, and U. A. Boelsterli, “The mitochondrial superoxide/thioredoxin-2/ask1 signaling pathway is critically involved in troglitazone-induced cell injury to human hepatocytes,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 341–349, 2008.

A. Schlotterer, A. Hamann, G. Kukudov et al., “Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1, p53, and thioredoxin are linked in control of aging in C. elegans,” Aging Cell, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 420–432, 2010.

J. C. Fierro-González, A. Cornils, J. Alcedo, A. Miranda-Vizuete, and P. Swoboda, “The thioredoxin TRX-1 modulates the function of the insulin-like neuropeptide DAF-28 during dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 1, Article ID e16561, 2011.

Y. Funato and H. Miki, “Nucleoredoxin, a novel thioredoxin family member involved in cell growth and differentiation,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1035–1057, 2007.

K. Hirota, M. Matsui, M. Murata et al., “Nucleoredoxin, glutaredoxin, and thioredoxin differentially regulate NF-κB, AP-1, and CREB activation in HEK293 cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 274, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 2000.

T. Hayashi, Y. Funato, T. Terabayashi et al., “Nucleoredoxin negatively regulates toll-like receptor 4 signaling via recruitment of flightless-I to myeloid differentiation primary response gene (88),” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 24, pp. 18586–18593, 2010.

Y. Funato, T. Terabayashi, R. Sakamoto et al., “Nucleoredoxin sustains Wnt/β-catenin signaling by retaining a pool of inactive dishevelled protein,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 1945–1952, 2010.

K. Kunchithapautham, B. Padmavathi, R. B. Narayanan, P. Kaliraj, and A. L. Scott, “Thioredoxin from Brugia malayi: defining a 16-kilodalton class of thioredoxins from nematodes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 4119–4126, 2003.

F. Hatahet and L. W. Ruddock, “Protein disulfide isomerase: a critical evaluation of its function in disulfide bond formation,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 2807–2850, 2009.

A. Pompella, A. Visvikis, A. Paolicchi, V. De Tata, and A. F. Casini, “The changing faces of glutathione, a cellular protagonist,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1499–1503, 2003.

F. Q. Schafer and G. R. Buettner, “Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1191–1212, 2001.

D. Sheehan, G. Meade, V. M. Foley, and C. A. Dowd, “Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 360, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2001.

C. E. Paulsen and K. S. Carroll, “Orchestrating redox signaling networks through regulatory cysteine switches,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 2010.

J. L. Hearne and R. F. Colman, “Delineation of xenobiotic substrate sites in rat glutathione S-transferase M1-1,” Protein Science, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2526–2536, 2005.

A. Chaudhari, M. W. Anderson, and T. E. Eling, “Conjugation of 15-keto-prostaglandins by glutathione S-transferases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 531, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 1978.

E. Christ-Hazelhof, D. H. Nugteren, and D. A. Van Dorp, “Conversions of prostaglandin endoperoxides by glutathione S transferases and serum albumins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 450, no. 3, pp. 450–461, 1976.

C. Hwang, A. J. Sinskey, and H. F. Lodish, “Oxidized redox state of glutathione in the endoplasmic reticulum,” Science, vol. 257, no. 5076, pp. 1496–1502, 1992.

M. Baryshev, E. Sargsyan, and S. Mkrtchian, “ERp29 is an essential endoplasmic reticulum factor regulating secretion of thyroglobulin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 617–624, 2006.

E. Sargsyan, M. Baryshev, L. Szekely, A. Sharipo, and S. Mkrtchian, “Identification of ERp29, an endoplasmic reticulum lumenal protein, as a new member of the thyroglobulin folding complex,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 19, pp. 17009–17015, 2002.

M. G. Desilva, J. Lu, G. Donadel et al., “Characterization and chromosomal localization of a new protein disulfide isomerase, PDIp, highly expressed in human pancreas,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 1996.

M. G. Desilva, “Molecular characterization of a pancreas-specific protein disulfide isomerase, PDIp,” DNA and Cell Biology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 269–274, 1997.

D. R. Peaper and P. Cresswell, “Regulation of MHC class I assembly and peptide binding,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 24, pp. 343–368, 2008.

A. Mezghrani, A. Fassio, A. Benham, T. Simmen, I. Braakman, and R. Sitia, “Manipulation of oxidative protein folding and PDI redox state in mammalian cells,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 6288–6296, 2001.

B. Zechmann, F. Mauch, L. Sticher, and M. Müller, “Subcellular immunocytochemical analysis detects the highest concentrations of glutathione in mitochondria and not in plastids,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 59, no. 14, pp. 4017–4027, 2008.

C. H. Foyer and G. Noctor, “Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: a metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses,” The Plant Cell, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1866–1875, 2005.

Z. Mou, W. Fan, and X. Dong, “Inducers of plant systemic acquired resistance regulate NPR1 function through redox changes,” Cell, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 935–944, 2003.

L. D. Gomez, G. Noctor, M. R. Knight, and C. H. Foyer, “Regulation of calcium signalling and gene expression by glutathione,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 55, no. 404, pp. 1851–1859, 2004.

D. Mustacich and G. Powis, “Thioredoxin reductase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 346, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2000.

S. M. Kanzok, A. Fechner, H. Bauer et al., “Substitution of the thioredoxin system for glutathione reductase in Drosophila melanogaster,” Science, vol. 291, no. 5504, pp. 643–646, 2001.

J. R. Pedrajas, E. Kosmidou, A. Miranda-Vizuete, J. A. Gustafsson, A. P. H. Wright, and G. Spyrou, “Identification and functional characterization of a novel mitochondrial thioredoxin system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 10, pp. 6366–6373, 1999.

J. Stenvall, J. C. Fierro-González, P. Swoboda et al., “Selenoprotein TRXR-1 and GSR-1 are essential for removal of old cuticle during molting in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 1064–1069, 2011.

V. I. Bunik, “2-Oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes in redox regulation: role of the lipoate residues and thioredoxin,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 270, no. 6, pp. 1036–1042, 2003.

L. Tretter and V. Adam-Vizi, “Generation of reactive oxygen species in the reaction catalyzed by α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 36, pp. 7771–7778, 2004.

A. A. Starkov, G. Fiskum, C. Chinopoulos et al., “Mitochondrial α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex generates reactive oxygen species,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 36, pp. 7779–7788, 2004.

A. J. Meyer, T. Brach, L. Marty et al., “Redox-sensitive GFP in Arabidopsis thaliana is a quantitative biosensor for the redox potential of the cellular glutathione redox buffer,” Plant Journal, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 973–986, 2007.

A. P. Fernandes and A. Holmgren, “Glutaredoxins: glutathione-dependent redox enzymes with functions far beyond a simple thioredoxin backup system,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2004.

P. Haunhorst, C. Berndt, S. Eitner, J. R. Godoy, and C. H. Lillig, “Characterization of the human monothiol glutaredoxin 3 (PICOT) as iron-sulfur protein,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 394, no. 2, pp. 372–376, 2010.

N. H. Cheng, “Picot, a novel monothiol glutaredoxin, plays a role in postembryonic growth and cardiac function in mice under nutritional perturbation,” Journal of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, vol. 23, abstract 617.8, 2009.

M. D. Shelton, P. B. Chock, and J. J. Mieyal, “Glutaredoxin: role in reversible protein S-glutathionylation and regulation of redox signal transduction and protein translocation,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 7, no. 3-4, pp. 348–366, 2005.

M. C. Sykes, A. L. Mowbray, and H. Jo, “Reversible glutathiolation of caspase-3 by glutaredoxin as a novel redox signaling mechanism in tumor necrosis factor-α-induced cell death,” Circulation Research, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 152–154, 2007.

T. Adachi, D. R. Pimentel, T. Heibeck et al., “S-glutathiolation of Ras mediates redox-sensitive signaling by angiotensin II in vascular smooth muscle cells,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 28, pp. 29857–29862, 2004.

K. L. Morgan, A. O. Estevez, C. L. Mueller et al., “The glutaredoxin GLRX-21 functions to prevent selenium-induced oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 118, no. 2, Article ID kfq273, pp. 530–543, 2010.

B. Wilkinson and H. F. Gilbert, “Protein disulfide isomerase,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1699, no. 1-2, pp. 35–44, 2004.

R. Bass, L. W. Ruddock, P. Klappa, and R. B. Freedman, “A major fraction of endoplasmic reticulum-located glutathione is present as mixed disulfides with protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 7, pp. 5257–5262, 2004.

A. R. Karala, P. Psarrakos, L. W. Ruddock, and P. Klappa, “Protein disulfide isomerases from C. elegans are equally efficient at thiol-disulfide exchange in simple peptide-based systems but show differences in reactivity towards protein substrates,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1815–1823, 2007.

A. D. Winter, G. McCormack, and A. P. Page, “Protein disulfide isomerase activity is essential for viability and extracellular matrix formation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans,” Developmental Biology, vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 449–461, 2007.

H. I. Alanen, K. E. H. Salo, A. Pirneskoski, and L. W. Ruddock, “pH dependence of the peptide thiol-disulfide oxidase activity of six members of the human protein bisulfide isomerase family,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 3-4, pp. 283–291, 2006.

A. D. Winter and A. P. Page, “Prolyl 4-hydroxylase is an essential procollagen-modifying enzyme required for exoskeleton formation and the maintenance of body shape in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 4084–4093, 2000.

K. Keskiaho, L. Kukkola, A. P. Page et al., “Characterization of a novel Caenorhabditis elegans prolyl 4-hydroxylase with a unique substrate specificity and restricted expression in the pharynx and excretory duct,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 16, pp. 10679–10689, 2008.

J. Veijola, P. Annunen, P. Koivunen, A. P. Page, T. Pihlajaniemi, and K. I. Kivirikko, “Baculovirus expression of two protein disulphide isomerase isoforms from Caenorhabditis elegans and characterization of prolyl 4-hydroxylases containing one of these polypeptides as their β subunit,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 317, no. 3, pp. 721–729, 1996.

F. C. F. Ko and K. L. Chow, “A novel thioredoxin-like protein encoded by the C. elegans dpy-11 gene is required for body and sensory organ morphogenesis,” Development, vol. 129, no. 5, pp. 1185–1194, 2002.

T. Higuchi, Y. Watanabe, and I. Waga, “Protein disulfide isomerase suppresses the transcriptional activity of NF-κB,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2004.

B. M. Babior, J. D. Lambeth, and W. Nauseef, “The neutrophil NADPH oxidase,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 397, no. 2, pp. 342–344, 2002.

J. C. Moreno, H. Bikker, M. J. E. Kempers et al., “Inactivating mutations in the gene for thyroid oxidase 2 (THOX2) and congenital hypothyroidism,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 2, pp. 95–102, 2002.

W. A. Edens, L. Sharling, G. Cheng et al., “Tyrosine cross-linking of extracellular matrix is catalyzed by Duox, a multidomain oxidase/peroxidase with homology to the phagocyte oxidase subunit gp91phox,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 879–891, 2001.

J. L. Meitzler, R. Brandman, and P. R. Ortiz De Montellano, “Perturbed heme binding is responsible for the blistering phenotype associated with mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans dual oxidase 1 (DUOX1) peroxidase domain,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 52, pp. 40991–41000, 2010.

G. R. Buettner, C. F. Ng, M. Wang, V. G. J. Rodgers, and F. Q. Schafer, “A New paradigm: manganese superoxide dismutase influences the production of H₂O₂ in cells and thereby their biological state,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1338–1350, 2006.

V. D. Longo, E. B. Gralla, and J. S. Valentine, “Superoxide dismutase activity is essential for stationary phase survival in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mitochondrial production of toxic oxygen species in vivo,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 21, pp. 12275–12280, 1996.

V. D. Longo, L. L. Liou, J. S. Valentine, and E. B. Gralla, “Mitochondrial superoxide decreases yeast survival in stationary phase,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 365, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1999.

J. Wawryn, A. Krzepiłko, A. Myszka, and T. Biliński, “Deficiency in superoxide dismutases shortens life span of yeast cells,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 249–253, 1999.

E. S. Unlu and A. Koc, “Effects of deleting mitochondrial antioxidant genes on life span,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1100, pp. 505–509, 2007.

J. P. Phillips, S. D. Campbell, D. Michaud, M. Charbonneau, and A. J. Hilliker, “Null mutation of copper/zinc superoxide dismutase in Drosophila confers hypersensitivity to paraquat and reduced longevity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 8, pp. 2761–2765, 1989.

S. Elchuri, T. D. Oberley, W. Qi et al., “CuZnSOD deficiency leads to persistent and widespread oxidative damage and hepatocarcinogenesis later in life,” Oncogene, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 367–380, 2005.

R. Doonan, J. J. McElwee, F. Matthijssens et al., “Against the oxidative damage theory of aging: superoxide dismutases protect against oxidative stress but have little or no effect on life span in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Genes and Development, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 3236–3241, 2008.

N. O. L. Seto, S. Hayashi, and G. M. Tener, “Overexpression of Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase in Drosophila does not affect life-span,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 4270–4274, 1990.

B. E. Staveley, J. P. Phillips, and A. J. Hilliker, “Phenotypic consequences of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase overexpression in Drosophila melanogaster,” Genome, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 867–872, 1990.

J. M. Van Raamsdonk and S. Hekimi, “Deletion of the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase sod-2 extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e1000361, 2009.

Y. Honda and S. Honda, “The daf-2 gene network for longevity regulates oxidative stress resistance and Mn-superoxide dismutase gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1385–1393, 1999.

S. I. Liochev and I. Fridovich, “Mechanism of the peroxidase activity of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 1565–1569, 2010.

A. K. Holley, V. Bakthavatchalu, J. M. Velez-Roman, and D. K. St Clair, “Manganese superoxide dismutase: guardian of the powerhouse,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 7114–7162, 2011.

M. Fujii, N. Ishii, A. Joguchi, K. Yasuda, and D. Ayusawa, “A novel superoxide dismutase gene encoding membrane-bound and extracellular isoforms by alternative splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans,” DNA Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 1998.

E. Lubos, J. Loscalzo, and D. E. Handy, “Glutathione peroxidase-1 in health and disease: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1957–1997, 2011.

J. R. Vanfleteren, “Oxidative stress and ageing in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 605–608, 1993.

M. Maiorino, F. Ursini, V. Bosello et al., “The thioredoxin specificity of Drosophila GPx: a paradigm for a peroxiredoxin-like mechanism of many glutathione peroxidases,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 365, no. 4, pp. 1033–1046, 2007.

Z. Faltin, D. Holland, M. Velcheva et al., “Glutathione peroxidase regulation of reactive oxygen species level is crucial for in vitro plant differentiation,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1151–1162, 2010.

E. Lubos, C. E. Mahoney, J. A. Leopold, Y. Y. Zhang, J. Loscalzo, and D. E. Handy, “Glutathione peroxidase-1 modulates lipopolysaccharide-induced adhesion molecule expression in endothelial cells by altering CD14 expression,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2525–2532, 2010.

E. Lubos, N. J. Kelly, S. R. Oldebeken et al., “Glutathione peroxidase-1 deficiency augments proinflammatory cytokine-induced redox signaling and human endothelial cell activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, pp. 35407–35417, 2011.

A. B. Carter, L. A. Tephly, S. Venkataraman et al., “High levels of catalase and glutathione peroxidase activity dampen H₂O₂ signaling in human alveolar macrophages,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2004.

J. Benner, H. Daniel, and B. Spanier, “A glutathione peroxidase, intracellular peptidases and the TOR complexes regulate peptide transporter PEPT-1 in C. elegans,” PloS one, vol. 6, Article ID e25624, 2011.

G. R. Sue, Z. C. Ho, and K. Kim, “Peroxiredoxins: a historical overview and speculative preview of novel mechanisms and emerging concepts in cell signaling,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 1543–1552, 2005.

K. Palande, O. Roovers, J. Gits et al., “Peroxiredoxin-controlled G-CSF signalling at the endoplasmic reticulum-early endosome interface,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, pp. 3695–3705, 2011.

K. Isermann, E. Liebau, T. Roeder, and I. Bruchhaus, “A peroxiredoxin specifically expressed in two types of pharyngeal neurons is required for normal growth and egg production in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 338, no. 4, pp. 745–755, 2004.

M. Oláhová, S. R. Taylor, S. Khazaipoul et al., “A redox-sensitive peroxiredoxin that is important for longevity has tissue- and stress-specific roles in stress resistance,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 50, pp. 19839–19844, 2008.

J. Taub, J. F. Lau, C. Ma et al., “A cytosolic catalase is needed to extend adult lifespan in C. elegans daf-C and clk-1 mutants,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6732, pp. 162–166, 1999.

S. H. Togo, M. Maebuchi, S. Yokota, M. Bun-ya, A. Kawahara, and T. Kamiryo, “Immunological detection of alkaline-diaminobenzidine-negative peroxisomes of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: purification and unique pH optima of peroxisomal catalase,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 5, pp. 1307–1312, 2000.

O. I. Petriv and R. A. Rachubinski, “Lack of peroxisomal catalase causes a progeric phenotype in Caenorhabditis elegans,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 19, pp. 19996–20001, 2004.

C. T. Murphy, S. A. McCarroll, C. I. Bargmann et al., “Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6946, pp. 277–284, 2003.